User talk:FIVETWOSEVEN - Revision history

FIVETWOSEVEN: /* KSG */

2011-06-17T05:51:13Z

KSG

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 17 June 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I've made the page for the [[Kel-Tec KSG]]. Please use this as a template for any future weapons pages you make. In the future, please spell the name of the weapon properly when creating the page. If you have any questions regarding how to make any other pages, you can put a question on my discussion page. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] 22:23, 16 June 2011 (CDT)		I've made the page for the [[Kel-Tec KSG]]. Please use this as a template for any future weapons pages you make. In the future, please spell the name of the weapon properly when creating the page. If you have any questions regarding how to make any other pages, you can put a question on my discussion page. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] 22:23, 16 June 2011 (CDT)

			I spelt it correctly, just had the capitalization wrong. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 00:51, 17 June 2011 (CDT)

Ben41: /* KSG */ new section

2011-06-17T03:23:36Z

KSG: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 17 June 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Sorry for not signing this or getting back to you sooner. That's a pretty good selection. I heard Mosins are pretty accurate and cheap. Check out my profile for my pieces. (Theyre too numerous to name here) --[[User:Ardtanker14\|ardtanker14]] 20:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)		Sorry for not signing this or getting back to you sooner. That's a pretty good selection. I heard Mosins are pretty accurate and cheap. Check out my profile for my pieces. (Theyre too numerous to name here) --[[User:Ardtanker14\|ardtanker14]] 20:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

			== KSG ==

			I've made the page for the [[Kel-Tec KSG]]. Please use this as a template for any future weapons pages you make. In the future, please spell the name of the weapon properly when creating the page. If you have any questions regarding how to make any other pages, you can put a question on my discussion page. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] 22:23, 16 June 2011 (CDT)

Ardtanker14 at 20:52, 9 January 2011

2011-01-09T20:52:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 9 January 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:

	A Savage 30-06, a Mosin Nagant 91/30, and a Argentinian Hi power.		A Savage 30-06, a Mosin Nagant 91/30, and a Argentinian Hi power.

			Sorry for not signing this or getting back to you sooner. That's a pretty good selection. I heard Mosins are pretty accurate and cheap. Check out my profile for my pieces. (Theyre too numerous to name here) --[[User:Ardtanker14\|ardtanker14]] 20:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

FIVETWOSEVEN: /* Firearms */

2010-12-12T21:06:46Z

Firearms

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 12 December 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Firearms ==		== Firearms ==
	Yo man...what kind of guns do you have?		Yo man...what kind of guns do you have?

			A Savage 30-06, a Mosin Nagant 91/30, and a Argentinian Hi power.

Ardtanker14 at 05:28, 12 December 2010

2010-12-12T05:28:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 12 December 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Heckler & Koch==		==Heckler & Koch==
	I read the article you provided the link to and found it very interesting. I always knew H&K was apathetic toward the civilian market but I never knew they were such outright dicks. Some of that impression may have been due to the author's tone, but the article still lowered my opinion of H&K. -[[User:Anonymous\|Anonymous]]		I read the article you provided the link to and found it very interesting. I always knew H&K was apathetic toward the civilian market but I never knew they were such outright dicks. Some of that impression may have been due to the author's tone, but the article still lowered my opinion of H&K. -[[User:Anonymous\|Anonymous]]



			== Firearms ==
			Yo man...what kind of guns do you have?

Anonymous: /* reply to your message */

2010-09-15T05:18:10Z

reply to your message

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 15 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

			==Heckler & Koch==
			I read the article you provided the link to and found it very interesting. I always knew H&K was apathetic toward the civilian market but I never knew they were such outright dicks. Some of that impression may have been due to the author's tone, but the article still lowered my opinion of H&K. -[[User:Anonymous\|Anonymous]]

FIVETWOSEVEN: /* From this point on */

2010-08-28T19:18:10Z

From this point on

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 28 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	~~== From this point on ==~~

	"I'm deleting any crap that has nothing to do about guns or this page ON SIGHT. If you want to talk about the game, take it to Treyarch's forum.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 02:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)"

	No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

	I'm sorry but I thought the rule was to keep it gun related not posting OMG ZOMBIES ARE IN THIS!!!!1 without anything to do with guns. There are specialized forums meant for this and this is for guns, doesn't really make sense that they can go off topic.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

	While discussion pages main purpose is the keep clutter off the main page if a weapon is misidentified. It's no problem or any rules stating that it has be gun related. As long as it's related to that title it's allowed. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Predator20: /* From this point on */

2010-08-16T01:36:10Z

From this point on

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 16 August 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I'm sorry but I thought the rule was to keep it gun related not posting OMG ZOMBIES ARE IN THIS!!!!1 without anything to do with guns. There are specialized forums meant for this and this is for guns, doesn't really make sense that they can go off topic.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)		I'm sorry but I thought the rule was to keep it gun related not posting OMG ZOMBIES ARE IN THIS!!!!1 without anything to do with guns. There are specialized forums meant for this and this is for guns, doesn't really make sense that they can go off topic.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

			While discussion pages main purpose is the keep clutter off the main page if a weapon is misidentified. It's no problem or any rules stating that it has be gun related. As long as it's related to that title it's allowed. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

FIVETWOSEVEN: /* From this point on */

2010-08-16T01:15:09Z

From this point on

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 16 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)		No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

			I'm sorry but I thought the rule was to keep it gun related not posting OMG ZOMBIES ARE IN THIS!!!!1 without anything to do with guns. There are specialized forums meant for this and this is for guns, doesn't really make sense that they can go off topic.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Predator20 at 22:01, 15 August 2010

2010-08-15T22:01:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 15 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
			== From this point on ==

			"I'm deleting any crap that has nothing to do about guns or this page ON SIGHT. If you want to talk about the game, take it to Treyarch's forum.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 02:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)"

			No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 28 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	~~== From this point on ==~~

	"I'm deleting any crap that has nothing to do about guns or this page ON SIGHT. If you want to talk about the game, take it to Treyarch's forum.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 02:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)"

	No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

	I'm sorry but I thought the rule was to keep it gun related not posting OMG ZOMBIES ARE IN THIS!!!!1 without anything to do with guns. There are specialized forums meant for this and this is for guns, doesn't really make sense that they can go off topic.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

	While discussion pages main purpose is the keep clutter off the main page if a weapon is misidentified. It's no problem or any rules stating that it has be gun related. As long as it's related to that title it's allowed. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 15 August 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		:Actually, I have experience with quite a few of the guns I dislike. I usually base my opinions on the gun's reputation by people who regularly carry them (every single serviceman I have met HATES the M9 with a passion) and from what I can gleam from handling it extensively-[[User:S&Wshooter\|S&Wshooter]] 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
	Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)		Granted I would rather be issued the SIG P226 which didn't beat the M9 because of cost, still isn't a bad gun. From what I've heard most of the problems are created because of the ammo thats issued. But what about all the other things you said? you bashed most of the major firearm companies saying that they are bad. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 23:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
			== From this point on ==

			"I'm deleting any crap that has nothing to do about guns or this page ON SIGHT. If you want to talk about the game, take it to Treyarch's forum.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN\|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 02:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)"

			No you will not, you're on notice. If you continue to delete sections of discussion pages just because they aren't gun related, you'll be temporarily banned. Only if you started the topic and your question is answered you're allowed to delete. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 22:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)