Talk:Zardoz - Revision history

Evil Tim: /* dropping guns */

2012-02-17T08:35:38Z

dropping guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 17 February 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)		I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)
	:It's those special movie guns. You know, the ones that that can blow a guy off his feet and never run out of ammo except at the most dramatic and crucial moments. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (CST)		:It's those special movie guns. You know, the ones that that can blow a guy off his feet and never run out of ammo except at the most dramatic and crucial moments. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (CST)
			::It says a lot about the movie that what you're talking about is the ''least'' ridiculous thing in that scene, mind you. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 17 February 2012 (CST)

Funkychinaman at 22:37, 16 February 2012

2012-02-16T22:37:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 16 February 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==dropping guns==		==dropping guns==
	I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)		I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)
			:It's those special movie guns. You know, the ones that that can blow a guy off his feet and never run out of ammo except at the most dramatic and crucial moments. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (CST)

Excalibur01 at 22:27, 16 February 2012

2012-02-16T22:27:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 16 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)


			The Gun is good. The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill! Zardoz has spoken. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 16:27, 16 February 2012 (CST)

	==dropping guns==		==dropping guns==
	I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)		I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 19:51, 16 February 2012

2012-02-16T19:51:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:51, 16 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

			==dropping guns==
			I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)

Charon68 at 15:22, 5 March 2011

2011-03-05T15:22:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 5 March 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
			:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

Jcordell at 01:12, 5 March 2011

2011-03-05T01:12:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 5 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
			:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

PistolJunkie at 01:06, 5 March 2011

2011-03-05T01:06:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 5 March 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
			:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

Jcordell at 00:40, 5 March 2011

2011-03-05T00:40:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 5 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I thought the screencap of Connery with the Webley-Fosbery was too good not to add. Hey that is from the movie. And it was the seventies.--[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 19:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)		I thought the screencap of Connery with the Webley-Fosbery was too good not to add. Hey that is from the movie. And it was the seventies.--[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 19:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

			Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

Jcordell: New page: I thought the screencap of Connery with the Webley-Fosbery was too good not to add. Hey that is from the movie. And it was the seventies.--~~~~

2009-05-25T19:08:26Z

New page: I thought the screencap of Connery with the Webley-Fosbery was too good not to add. Hey that is from the movie. And it was the seventies.--~~~~

New page

I thought the screencap of Connery with the Webley-Fosbery was too good not to add. Hey that is from the movie. And it was the seventies.--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 19:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 17 February 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)		I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)
	:It's those special movie guns. You know, the ones that that can blow a guy off his feet and never run out of ammo except at the most dramatic and crucial moments. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (CST)		:It's those special movie guns. You know, the ones that that can blow a guy off his feet and never run out of ammo except at the most dramatic and crucial moments. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (CST)
			::It says a lot about the movie that what you're talking about is the ''least'' ridiculous thing in that scene, mind you. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 17 February 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 16 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)


			The Gun is good. The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill! Zardoz has spoken. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 16:27, 16 February 2012 (CST)

	==dropping guns==		==dropping guns==
	I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)		I always find it amusing that movies can drop guns from great heights, hundreds of feet, and they don't get a scratch. Dropping most firearms in giant bundles from that high in the air would probably render a good half of them inoperable (stock cracks, receiver cracks, bent barrels, etc). Thoughts anyone? :) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 13:51, 16 February 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 5 March 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
			:::Hand to god a Facebook (yes I am on it) status I put up a little while ago referenced movies which made more sense when I was stoned when I was a kid. This is one of those movies!!! --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 18:22, 5 March 2011 (MSK)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 5 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		Fox Movie Channel showed this last night. I haven't actua;lly just sat watched this movie since I was in high school circa 1985. God this is a weird movie, but in a strange way very watchable. Drugs would probably have helped though. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 03:40, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
	:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)		:That's no surprise, seeing as the filmmakers were very open about it being made on drugs.--[[User:PistolJunkie\|PistolJunkie]] 04:06, 5 March 2011 (MSK)
			:: Ah ha! So much now makes sense. I was worried that this movie might have been made by people who were sober. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell\|Jcordell]] 04:12, 5 March 2011 (MSK)