Talk:The Woman Knight of Mirror Lake - Revision history

WZHBot: WZHBot moved page Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The to Talk:The Woman Knight of Mirror Lake: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

2023-07-29T00:15:57Z

WZHBot moved page Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The to Talk:The Woman Knight of Mirror Lake: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:15, 29 July 2023
(No difference)

Wuzh: Wuzh moved page Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The (Jian hu nu xia Qiu Jin) to Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The

2019-12-03T07:06:08Z

Wuzh moved page Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The (Jian hu nu xia Qiu Jin) to Talk:Woman Knight of Mirror Lake, The

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:06, 3 December 2019
(No difference)

Pandolfini at 20:00, 3 July 2013

2013-07-03T20:00:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 3 July 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
	[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]		[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]

			==Dynamite and flare ==
			Chen Boping ([[You-Nam Wong]]) uses dynamite to destroy a cannon.
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-021.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-022.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

			Imperial soldier on sentry tower fired.
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-023.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-024.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

Pandolfini at 06:55, 21 April 2013

2013-04-21T06:55:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 21 April 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
	[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|~~600px~~\|]]		[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]

Pandolfini: /* Smith & Wesson revolver */

2013-04-20T23:28:22Z

Smith & Wesson revolver

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 20 April 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

Greg-Z: /* Smith & Wesson revolver */

2013-04-19T13:36:18Z

Smith & Wesson revolver

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 19 April 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
			:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 12:48, 19 April 2013

2013-04-19T12:48:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 19 April 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:
	The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
			::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Commando552 at 09:34, 19 April 2013

2013-04-19T09:34:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 19 April 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Commando552 at 09:30, 19 April 2013

2013-04-19T09:30:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 19 April 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
			:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Greg-Z: /* Smith & Wesson revolver */ new section

2013-04-19T07:38:40Z

Smith & Wesson revolver: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 19 April 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Oh, those Chinese! O.K. They actually are carbines, the copy of the Karabiner 98k - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:En-CKS_rifle-1.jpg		:::Oh, those Chinese! O.K. They actually are carbines, the copy of the Karabiner 98k - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:En-CKS_rifle-1.jpg
	::::Actually they are based on the Mauser Standard Model, which was the precursor to the Kar98k with some slight differences in the stock and a straight bolt. There are a mix of straight and down turned bolts on what both appear to be Type Zhongzheng rifles in this though (they should be straight, the stock image is not typical), have asked for more information on what is typical on the [[Talk:Mauser Rifle Series\|Mauser]] page. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 20:19, 18 April 2013 (EDT)		::::Actually they are based on the Mauser Standard Model, which was the precursor to the Kar98k with some slight differences in the stock and a straight bolt. There are a mix of straight and down turned bolts on what both appear to be Type Zhongzheng rifles in this though (they should be straight, the stock image is not typical), have asked for more information on what is typical on the [[Talk:Mauser Rifle Series\|Mauser]] page. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 20:19, 18 April 2013 (EDT)

			== Smith & Wesson revolver ==

			The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 3 July 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
	[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]		[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]

			==Dynamite and flare ==
			Chen Boping ([[You-Nam Wong]]) uses dynamite to destroy a cannon.
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-021.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-022.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

			Imperial soldier on sentry tower fired.
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-023.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-024.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 21 April 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
	[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|~~600px~~\|]]		[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|550px\|]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 20 April 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT) I managed to do shot from the side to help better identification.--[[User:Pandolfini\|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini\|talk]]) 19:28, 20 April 2013 (EDT)
			[[Image:JHNQXJ-027.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 19 April 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
			:::It seems to me that S&W revolvers were more common outside USA than Iver Johnsons, and a Chinese movie will more likely show an S&W. But if this revolver isn't a real gun but an airsoft, then it can be any model. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 09:36, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 19 April 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:
	The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		The revolver looks a little small for [[Smith & Wesson New Model No.3]], comparing with the size of the hand. Maybe it is some pocket version of S&W? There was a lot of .38 and .32 clones of S&W New Model, manufactured in Belgium and Spain. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 03:38, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
	:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)		:I agree that it is too small, but can't tell what it is without a better angle on it. Based on the rounded rear of the trigger guard and its position relative to the front of the cylinder, my guess would be a S&W .32 4th model double action. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 05:30, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
			::Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)