Talk:The November Man - Revision history

WZHBot: WZHBot moved page Talk:November Man, The to Talk:The November Man: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

2023-07-28T22:24:03Z

WZHBot moved page Talk:November Man, The to Talk:The November Man: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:24, 28 July 2023
(No difference)

James-Bond-007: /* Walther P99 AS */

2018-06-29T06:48:46Z

Walther P99 AS

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 29 June 2018
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Devereaux (Brosnan) also happens to use a [[Walther P99AS]] during the shootout in the hallway at the hotel which I think is a continuity error. But, it is quite clear in the promotional pictures he was carrying one when he was supposed to be armed with a different firearm - his CZ 75 SP-01 SHADOW. Fedorov (Lazar Ristovski) also carries a P99AS in a flashback scene as a result of yet another continuity error when he's supposed to hold a Zastava CZ99 in his hand.		Devereaux (Brosnan) also happens to use a [[Walther P99AS]] during the shootout in the hallway at the hotel which I think is a continuity error. But, it is quite clear in the promotional pictures he was carrying one when he was supposed to be armed with a different firearm - his CZ 75 SP-01 SHADOW. Fedorov (Lazar Ristovski) also carries a P99AS in a flashback scene as a result of yet another continuity error when he's supposed to hold a Zastava CZ99 in his hand.

	Posting a few examples here for those more expert in the field of firearms to review.		Posting a few examples here for those more expert in the field of firearms to review. --[[User:James-Bond-007\|James-Bond-007]] ([[User talk:James-Bond-007\|talk]]) 02:48, 29 June 2018 (EDT)

	[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS.jpg]]		[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-2.jpeg]]		[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-2.jpeg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-3.jpeg]]		[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-3.jpeg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:P99AS-NovemberMan-Ristovski.jpeg]]		[[File:P99AS-NovemberMan-Ristovski.jpeg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

James-Bond-007: /* Walther P99 AS */ new section

2018-06-29T06:48:04Z

Walther P99 AS: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 29 June 2018
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Ahh, easy mistake to make, when I posted the Shadow I didn't even notice the standard SP-O1--[[User:1911isthebestgunever\|One shot is all it takes.]] ([[User talk:1911isthebestgunever\|talk]]) 18:31, 8 August 2014 (EDT)		Ahh, easy mistake to make, when I posted the Shadow I didn't even notice the standard SP-O1--[[User:1911isthebestgunever\|One shot is all it takes.]] ([[User talk:1911isthebestgunever\|talk]]) 18:31, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
	::It kind of looks like there's a barrel bushing. If it is, then that's a CZ SP-01 ACCU Shadow--[[User:ThePotShot\|ThePotShot]] ([[User talk:ThePotShot\|talk]]) 04:08, 9 August 2014 (EDT)		::It kind of looks like there's a barrel bushing. If it is, then that's a CZ SP-01 ACCU Shadow--[[User:ThePotShot\|ThePotShot]] ([[User talk:ThePotShot\|talk]]) 04:08, 9 August 2014 (EDT)

			== Walther P99 AS ==

			Devereaux (Brosnan) also happens to use a [[Walther P99AS]] during the shootout in the hallway at the hotel which I think is a continuity error. But, it is quite clear in the promotional pictures he was carrying one when he was supposed to be armed with a different firearm - his CZ 75 SP-01 SHADOW. Fedorov (Lazar Ristovski) also carries a P99AS in a flashback scene as a result of yet another continuity error when he's supposed to hold a Zastava CZ99 in his hand.

			Posting a few examples here for those more expert in the field of firearms to review.

			[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS.jpg]]
			[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-2.jpeg]]
			[[File:Brosnan-NovemberMan-P99AS-3.jpeg]]
			[[File:P99AS-NovemberMan-Ristovski.jpeg]]

Kliwher: /* Beretta 84FS */

2015-02-06T22:19:53Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 6 February 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)


	::::Hey Ben41, thanks for the persistence. This would perfectly explain the 92FS controls but the 84FS size. Take care, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 08:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::::Hey Ben41, thanks for the persistence. This would perfectly explain the 92FS controls but the 84FS size. Take care, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 08:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
			:::::I think it's a beretta 92 Centurion Inox [[User:Kliwher]]

	==Please help ID==		==Please help ID==

PeeWee055: /* Beretta 84FS */

2014-08-13T12:13:13Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 13 August 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)

			::::Hey Ben41, thanks for the persistence. This would perfectly explain the 92FS controls but the 84FS size. Take care, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 08:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)

	==Please help ID==		==Please help ID==

Ben41: /* Beretta 84FS */

2014-08-13T10:13:33Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 13 August 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]]		[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]]

	:Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		:Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT)

			:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)

	==Please help ID==		==Please help ID==

PeeWee055 at 10:08, 13 August 2014

2014-08-13T10:08:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:08, 13 August 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:
	It's probably this blank-firing pistol:		It's probably this blank-firing pistol:
	[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]]		[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]]

			:Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT)

	==Please help ID==		==Please help ID==

Ben41: /* Beretta 84FS */

2014-08-13T09:47:10Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 13 August 2014
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we are probably dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design as opposed to the 84FS (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we are probably dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design as opposed to the 84FS (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
	[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

			It's probably this blank-firing pistol:
			[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]]

	==Please help ID==		==Please help ID==

PeeWee055: /* Beretta 84FS */

2014-08-13T08:37:33Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 13 August 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)		: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)

	::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we ~~might just be~~ dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we are probably dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design as opposed to the 84FS (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
	[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

PeeWee055: /* Beretta 84FS */

2014-08-13T08:35:09Z

Beretta 84FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 13 August 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)		: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)

	::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we might just be dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design: (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we might just be dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
	[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:37, 13 August 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)		: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)

	::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we ~~might just be~~ dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we are probably dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design as opposed to the 84FS (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
	[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, 13 August 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)		: Barrel's too short for a 92FS. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (EDT)

	::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we might just be dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design: (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)		::Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we might just be dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
	[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Beretta 84-92v2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]