Talk:The Avengers (1998) - Revision history

WZHBot: WZHBot moved page Talk:Avengers, The (1998) to Talk:The Avengers (1998): Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

2023-07-28T19:39:17Z

WZHBot moved page Talk:Avengers, The (1998) to Talk:The Avengers (1998): Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:39, 28 July 2023
(No difference)

Funkychinaman at 17:30, 17 March 2014

2014-03-17T17:30:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 17 March 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Anyway, let me know what you think, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:05, 17 March 2014 (EDT)		Anyway, let me know what you think, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:05, 17 March 2014 (EDT)
			:I think the movie's critical and commercial failure is the film's biggest legacy. People expected a lot from this film, and it had a decent cast, a post-''Schindler's List'' but pre-''English Patient'' Ralph Fiennes, Uma Thurman, and Sean Connery, with an up and coming director. I think the biggest surprise is that no one has ever released the original cut of the film, despite the director's offer to reassemble it for free. Was it that bad, or do they just want people to forget? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 13:30, 17 March 2014 (EDT)

PeeWee055: /* Suggestion to revise intro text */

2014-03-17T10:06:30Z

Suggestion to revise intro text

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 17 March 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I would suggest to move below lines from the intro text to the discussion page. I can totally relate to the comments but they sound pretty judgmental and as such more suitable for the discussion page.		I would suggest to move below lines from the intro text to the discussion page. I can totally relate to the comments but they sound pretty judgmental and as such more suitable for the discussion page.

	"''The original cut of the film clocked in at 115 minutes, but the studio chopped it down to only 87 minutes after a disastrous test screening. The final cut was a disorganized mess, incoherent and full of plot holes, and the premiere was moved from June of 1998 to August, with no previews for critics. Although the film is largely forgotten today''."		"''The original cut of the film clocked in at 115 minutes, but the studio chopped it down to only 87 minutes after a disastrous test screening. The final cut was a disorganized mess, incoherent and full of plot holes, and the premiere was moved from June of 1998 to August, with no previews for critics. Although the film is largely forgotten today''..."

	Anyway, let me know what you think, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:05, 17 March 2014 (EDT)		Anyway, let me know what you think, [[User:PeeWee055\|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055\|talk]]) 06:05, 17 March 2014 (EDT)

PeeWee055: /* Suggestion to revise intro text */ new section

2014-03-17T10:05:46Z

Suggestion to revise intro text: new section

New page

== Suggestion to revise intro text ==

I would suggest to move below lines from the intro text to the discussion page. I can totally relate to the comments but they sound pretty judgmental and as such more suitable for the discussion page.

"''The original cut of the film clocked in at 115 minutes, but the studio chopped it down to only 87 minutes after a disastrous test screening. The final cut was a disorganized mess, incoherent and full of plot holes, and the premiere was moved from June of 1998 to August, with no previews for critics. Although the film is largely forgotten today''."

Anyway, let me know what you think, [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 06:05, 17 March 2014 (EDT)