Talk:Takers - Revision history

I'mallaboutguns.1: /* Kimber */

2016-12-19T04:38:33Z

Kimber

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 19 December 2016
Line 96:		Line 96:
	==Kimber==		==Kimber==

	Reason I identified it as a Kimber Crimson Pro Carry and I could be wrong because the gun in ''[[Burn Notice]]'' looks exactly the same and it's a Kimber Pro Carry II with a two-tone & magwell, I compared this 2 pics from 2 different programs and tell me what you think. ''[[Takers]]'' and ''[[Burn Notice]]'' take a look. [[User:I'mallaboutguns.1\|I'mallaboutguns.1]] ([[User talk:I'mallaboutguns.1\|talk]])		Reason I identified it as a Kimber Crimson Pro Carry (and I could be wrong) because the gun in ''[[Burn Notice]]'' looks exactly the same and it's a Kimber Pro Carry II with a two-tone & magwell, I compared this 2 pics from 2 different programs and tell me what you think. ''[[Takers]]'' and ''[[Burn Notice]]'' take a look. [[User:I'mallaboutguns.1\|I'mallaboutguns.1]] ([[User talk:I'mallaboutguns.1\|talk]])
	[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Takers]]		[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Takers]]
	[[File:BurnS1_028.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Burn Notice]]		[[File:BurnS1_028.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Burn Notice]]

I'mallaboutguns.1 at 02:03, 19 December 2016

2016-12-19T02:03:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 19 December 2016
Line 93:		Line 93:
	First, that's not how we generally post images on the site - I've posted the image you were trying to show below, hopefully this gives you an example. Second, remember to sign your posts with this - <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>. That said, I mostly agree with the Officer's ACP ID. Not positive, but I think it's a good bet. I do certainly agree it's not the Kimber. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 01:41, 18 December 2016 (EST)		First, that's not how we generally post images on the site - I've posted the image you were trying to show below, hopefully this gives you an example. Second, remember to sign your posts with this - <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>. That said, I mostly agree with the Officer's ACP ID. Not positive, but I think it's a good bet. I do certainly agree it's not the Kimber. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 01:41, 18 December 2016 (EST)
	[[Image:Colt1991A1OA.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|Colt Officer's ACP two-tone with Novak-style sights and Commander-style hammer - .45 ACP]]		[[Image:Colt1991A1OA.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|Colt Officer's ACP two-tone with Novak-style sights and Commander-style hammer - .45 ACP]]

			==Kimber==

			Reason I identified it as a Kimber Crimson Pro Carry and I could be wrong because the gun in ''[[Burn Notice]]'' looks exactly the same and it's a Kimber Pro Carry II with a two-tone & magwell, I compared this 2 pics from 2 different programs and tell me what you think. ''[[Takers]]'' and ''[[Burn Notice]]'' take a look. [[User:I'mallaboutguns.1\|I'mallaboutguns.1]] ([[User talk:I'mallaboutguns.1\|talk]])
			[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Takers]]
			[[File:BurnS1_028.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Burn Notice]]

StanTheMan: /* John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt */

2016-12-18T06:41:52Z

John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:41, 18 December 2016
Line 90:		Line 90:
	http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/94/Colt1991A1OA.jpg		http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/94/Colt1991A1OA.jpg
	</gallery>		</gallery>

			First, that's not how we generally post images on the site - I've posted the image you were trying to show below, hopefully this gives you an example. Second, remember to sign your posts with this - <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>. That said, I mostly agree with the Officer's ACP ID. Not positive, but I think it's a good bet. I do certainly agree it's not the Kimber. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 01:41, 18 December 2016 (EST)
			[[Image:Colt1991A1OA.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|Colt Officer's ACP two-tone with Novak-style sights and Commander-style hammer - .45 ACP]]

GAClass3NFA: /* John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt */

2016-12-18T06:07:29Z

John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 18 December 2016
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Here's a picture I found on the site already:		Here's a picture I found on the site already:
	~~[[File:~~http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/94/Colt1991A1OA.jpg]]		<gallery>
			http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/94/Colt1991A1OA.jpg
			</gallery>

GAClass3NFA: /* John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt */ new section

2016-12-18T06:04:48Z

John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 18 December 2016
Line 79:		Line 79:

	[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Note the extended magwell]]		[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Note the extended magwell]]

			== John Rahway's 1911 is a Colt ==

			A lot of people were wondering just what exactly is the 1911 Johns using. Kimber Pro Carry? I don't think. Doesn't look big enough to be a Pro Carry, sights aren't the same and there's an indistinct emblem on the grips. Also in the shot where you see the front of the gun you notice the barrel is recessed into the frame. Someone mentioned a Colt Commander. Again it looks shorter than the commander which is a 4.25" barrel.

			After looking around I believe John Rahway's gun to be the Colt Officer ACP chambered in .45ACP. It's a 3.5" barrel which puts it at the correct size, has the recessed barrel, Colt grips that have an emblem in the middle and it has a bushing which no other 1911 that size has, that I believe anyway.

			Here's a picture I found on the site already:
			[[File:http://www.imfdb.org/images/9/94/Colt1991A1OA.jpg]]

Bristow8411: /* Another 1911 topic */ new section

2016-08-26T01:25:04Z

Another 1911 topic: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 26 August 2016
Line 73:		Line 73:
	[[Image:TakersM4A1_5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A.J. fires his M4A1. Note the flames on the background.]]		[[Image:TakersM4A1_5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A.J. fires his M4A1. Note the flames on the background.]]
	roflcopter [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:17, 21 September 2011 (CDT)		roflcopter [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:17, 21 September 2011 (CDT)

			== Another 1911 topic ==

			Are we sure it's the Kimber Pro Carry Crimson? I ask because in this image, it looks like his 1911 has an extended magwell and as far as I'm aware, that doesn't come with the Pro Carry[[User:Bristow8411\|Bristow8411]] ([[User talk:Bristow8411\|talk]]) 21:25, 25 August 2016 (EDT)

			[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Note the extended magwell]]

Bozitojugg3rn4ut: /* LOL */ new section

2011-09-21T21:17:16Z

LOL: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 21 September 2011
Line 67:		Line 67:

	The SIG used by Jake Attica appears to be a two-tone P228, not a P226. The barrel looks too short, and if you look closely, the trigger guard is rounded, not squared (the biggest visual difference between the 228 and 226). -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 23:56, 9 March 2011 (MSK)		The SIG used by Jake Attica appears to be a two-tone P228, not a P226. The barrel looks too short, and if you look closely, the trigger guard is rounded, not squared (the biggest visual difference between the 228 and 226). -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 23:56, 9 March 2011 (MSK)

			== LOL ==

			Whoever wrote this deserves a medallion:
			[[Image:TakersM4A1_5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A.J. fires his M4A1. Note the flames on the background.]]
			roflcopter [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:17, 21 September 2011 (CDT)

MT2008: /* Who called this the new Heat? */

2011-03-13T17:28:56Z

Who called this the new Heat?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 13 March 2011
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Uhh... why is everybody getting so upset? You realize that all the reviews in the commercials were excerpts, right? They were just spun so that it looked like the movie was getting good press. One reviewer could have said: "The director and cast try and fail to pass this movie off as 'Heat' for a new generation," but the people who do the commercials only took those last four words! They're just paraphrasing the reviewer, in a way. In the text that praises the movie, the ellipses (...) is where the negative part of the review ended.		Uhh... why is everybody getting so upset? You realize that all the reviews in the commercials were excerpts, right? They were just spun so that it looked like the movie was getting good press. One reviewer could have said: "The director and cast try and fail to pass this movie off as 'Heat' for a new generation," but the people who do the commercials only took those last four words! They're just paraphrasing the reviewer, in a way. In the text that praises the movie, the ellipses (...) is where the negative part of the review ended.

			:Just saw this movie not too long ago (and I added a few more screencaps that I thought were worth including). It was decent, good production values and cinematography, but definitely not one of the best cops-and-robbers flicks ever made (or even from the last 10 years). Definitely not ''[[Heat]]'' (goes without saying), because the characters aren't the least bit interesting in the way that Vincent Hanna and Neil McCauley were. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 20:28, 13 March 2011 (MSK)

	== 1911 ==		== 1911 ==

MT2008: /* Jake's SIG */

2011-03-09T20:57:00Z

Jake's SIG

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 9 March 2011
Line 64:		Line 64:
	==Jake's SIG==		==Jake's SIG==

	The SIG used by Jake Attica appears to be a two-tone P228, not a P226. The barrel looks too short, and if you look closely, the trigger guard is rounded, not squared (the biggest visual difference between the ~~288~~ and 226). -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 23:56, 9 March 2011 (MSK)		The SIG used by Jake Attica appears to be a two-tone P228, not a P226. The barrel looks too short, and if you look closely, the trigger guard is rounded, not squared (the biggest visual difference between the 228 and 226). -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 23:56, 9 March 2011 (MSK)

MT2008: /* Walker's 1911 */

2011-03-09T20:56:32Z

Walker's 1911

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 9 March 2011
Line 61:		Line 61:
	[[Image:Takers1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|The gun in the film]]		[[Image:Takers1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|The gun in the film]]
	[[Image:WilsonProtector.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Wilson Combat Protector]]		[[Image:WilsonProtector.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Wilson Combat Protector]]

			==Jake's SIG==

			The SIG used by Jake Attica appears to be a two-tone P228, not a P226. The barrel looks too short, and if you look closely, the trigger guard is rounded, not squared (the biggest visual difference between the 288 and 226). -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] 23:56, 9 March 2011 (MSK)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 19 December 2016
Line 93:		Line 93:
	First, that's not how we generally post images on the site - I've posted the image you were trying to show below, hopefully this gives you an example. Second, remember to sign your posts with this - <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>. That said, I mostly agree with the Officer's ACP ID. Not positive, but I think it's a good bet. I do certainly agree it's not the Kimber. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 01:41, 18 December 2016 (EST)		First, that's not how we generally post images on the site - I've posted the image you were trying to show below, hopefully this gives you an example. Second, remember to sign your posts with this - <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>. That said, I mostly agree with the Officer's ACP ID. Not positive, but I think it's a good bet. I do certainly agree it's not the Kimber. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 01:41, 18 December 2016 (EST)
	[[Image:Colt1991A1OA.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|Colt Officer's ACP two-tone with Novak-style sights and Commander-style hammer - .45 ACP]]		[[Image:Colt1991A1OA.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|Colt Officer's ACP two-tone with Novak-style sights and Commander-style hammer - .45 ACP]]

			==Kimber==

			Reason I identified it as a Kimber Crimson Pro Carry and I could be wrong because the gun in ''[[Burn Notice]]'' looks exactly the same and it's a Kimber Pro Carry II with a two-tone & magwell, I compared this 2 pics from 2 different programs and tell me what you think. ''[[Takers]]'' and ''[[Burn Notice]]'' take a look. [[User:I'mallaboutguns.1\|I'mallaboutguns.1]] ([[User talk:I'mallaboutguns.1\|talk]])
			[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Takers]]
			[[File:BurnS1_028.jpg\|thumb\|none\|500px\|Burn Notice]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 26 August 2016
Line 73:		Line 73:
	[[Image:TakersM4A1_5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A.J. fires his M4A1. Note the flames on the background.]]		[[Image:TakersM4A1_5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A.J. fires his M4A1. Note the flames on the background.]]
	roflcopter [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:17, 21 September 2011 (CDT)		roflcopter [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:17, 21 September 2011 (CDT)

			== Another 1911 topic ==

			Are we sure it's the Kimber Pro Carry Crimson? I ask because in this image, it looks like his 1911 has an extended magwell and as far as I'm aware, that doesn't come with the Pro Carry[[User:Bristow8411\|Bristow8411]] ([[User talk:Bristow8411\|talk]]) 21:25, 25 August 2016 (EDT)

			[[File:Takers1911-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Note the extended magwell]]