Talk:Shaft (2019) - Revision history

StanTheMan: /* Revolver */

2019-02-09T18:58:28Z

Revolver

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 9 February 2019
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== Revolver ==		== Revolver ==

	It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it ~~may~~ a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)		It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it's a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)

PaperCake at 16:11, 9 February 2019

2019-02-09T16:11:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 9 February 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
	: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, though it could be a sawed down/off 590. It's definitely not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)		: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, though it could be a sawed down/off 590. It's definitely not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)
			::Sawn off is possible but given that specific grip, it's probably just a legitimate Shockwave. -- [[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 11:11, 9 February 2019 (EST)

	== Revolver ==		== Revolver ==

	It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)		It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Cruiser */

2019-02-09T05:02:39Z

Cruiser

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 9 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
	: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, ~~and~~ not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)		: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, though it could be a sawed down/off 590. It's definitely not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)

	== Revolver ==		== Revolver ==

	It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)		It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Revolver */ new section

2019-02-09T04:54:41Z

Revolver: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 9 February 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
	: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, and not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)		: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, and not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)

			== Revolver ==

			It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Cruiser */

2019-02-09T04:52:55Z

Cruiser

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 9 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
	: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, and not a Compact Cruiser ~~since~~ given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)		: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, and not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Cruiser */

2019-02-09T04:52:40Z

Cruiser

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 9 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
			: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, and not a Compact Cruiser since given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Please help ID */

2019-02-09T04:49:37Z

Please help ID

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 9 February 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)
	::It looks smaller than that. It may be a Kel-Tec P-3AT or a P-32. And the frame appears to be purple. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::It looks smaller than that. It may be a Kel-Tec P-3AT or a P-32. And the frame appears to be purple. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2019 (EST)
			::: I agree with FCM. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:49, 8 February 2019 (EST)

	== Cruiser ==		== Cruiser ==

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).

Funkychinaman at 02:44, 9 February 2019

2019-02-09T02:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 9 February 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)
			::It looks smaller than that. It may be a Kel-Tec P-3AT or a P-32. And the frame appears to be purple. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2019 (EST)
	== Cruiser ==		== Cruiser ==

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).

PaperCake at 01:28, 9 February 2019

2019-02-09T01:28:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 9 February 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)

			== Cruiser ==

			That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).

Ben41 at 00:43, 9 February 2019

2019-02-09T00:43:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 9 February 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:

	If I were to guess. Looks like a Kel-Tec P11 [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01\|talk]]) 16:08, 8 February 2019 (EST)		If I were to guess. Looks like a Kel-Tec P11 [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01\|talk]]) 16:08, 8 February 2019 (EST)

			::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 9 February 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).
	: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, though it could be a sawed down/off 590. It's definitely not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)		: I have to agree with it being a Shockwave, though it could be a sawed down/off 590. It's definitely not a Compact Cruiser given the C-style grip instead of a straight pistol grip. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:52, 8 February 2019 (EST)
			::Sawn off is possible but given that specific grip, it's probably just a legitimate Shockwave. -- [[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 11:11, 9 February 2019 (EST)

	== Revolver ==		== Revolver ==

	It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)		It clearly has a 6" barrel, not four. Having said that though it's tough to tell with the motion blur it looks to have the tapered barrel making me think it may a .357 N-frame and not a .44 Model 29. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:54, 8 February 2019 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 9 February 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::Thanks. --[[User:Ben41\|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41\|talk]]) 19:43, 8 February 2019 (EST)
	::It looks smaller than that. It may be a Kel-Tec P-3AT or a P-32. And the frame appears to be purple. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2019 (EST)		::It looks smaller than that. It may be a Kel-Tec P-3AT or a P-32. And the frame appears to be purple. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 21:44, 8 February 2019 (EST)
			::: I agree with FCM. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:49, 8 February 2019 (EST)

	== Cruiser ==		== Cruiser ==

	That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).		That doesn't look like a Cruiser at all, given the grip and shorter barrel, we might have the first movie appearance of a Mossberg Shockwave. ----[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 20:28, 9 February 2019 (EST).