Talk:PowerSlave - Revision history

Clonehunter: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:48:12Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 2 July 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it in mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it in mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
			::::: Alright, lets do that. I've never been great with revolvers, though I had simply passed the lack of the gap as the artist just filling in pixels. I'll keep the rest in mind, too. Thanks! --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:48, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:24:40Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:24, 2 July 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it in mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:21:52Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 2 July 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
			:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

Clonehunter: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:09:26Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 2 July 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

			:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:04:24Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 2 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code ~~(ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and~~ the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code with the full break line clearing near the top (Ex. <nowiki>__TOC__<br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

	:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T03:01:46Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 2 July 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

			:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T02:55:45Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 2 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki>br_clear=all</nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page <nowiki>[[Category:~~Example~~]]</nowiki>. I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T02:54:38Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 2 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki>br_clear=all</nowiki>)~~, also~~ Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types (which I figure you should ~~have~~ if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons) and categorization at the bottom <nowiki>[[Category:Example]]</nowiki>. I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of ~~what~~ I've done ~~for future pages~~ and you should be fine for the most part. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki>br_clear=all</nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page <nowiki>[[Category:Example]]</nowiki>. I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* Okay now */

2015-07-02T02:52:55Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 2 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
			: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki>br_clear=all</nowiki>), also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types (which I figure you should have if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons) and categorization at the bottom <nowiki>[[Category:Example]]</nowiki>. I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of what I've done for future pages and you should be fine for the most part. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

Clonehunter: /* Okay now */

2015-07-01T22:37:46Z

Okay now

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 1 July 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Okay now ==		== Okay now ==

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and ~~etail~~. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 2 July 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::Whoops, sorry about the categories, and yah I saw the bit on my talk page. Another one I forgot. Also, wasn't sure about the categorization of the page as there were so few weapons. As for the rationale, is was the closest match I could find, but I agree it is a bit vague, and probably could be any of those. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:09, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it in mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:::: No problem, like I said, just keep it in mind next time and you should be game, the rest of it looked fine. As for the S&W ID - We don't have much to go on given the graphics detail, but the gun does look to have a bull barrel (ruling out the .357 Magnum N-frames), and doesn't seem to have a cylinder gap (which would rule out the .44 Spl-only Model 24). That leaves the .45 Colt version of the [[Smith & Wesson Model 25]] and the [[Smith & Wesson Model 29]]. Of those two, I'd go with Model 29 - The features (what we can discern anyway) fit, and of course is it somewhat better known as well, I figure it's a safe bet. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:21, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
			::::: Alright, lets do that. I've never been great with revolvers, though I had simply passed the lack of the gap as the artist just filling in pixels. I'll keep the rest in mind, too. Thanks! --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 23:48, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 2 July 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code ~~(ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and~~ the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code with the full break line clearing near the top (Ex. <nowiki>__TOC__<br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

	:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 2 July 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		So, I've redone the whole page with better screen shots and detail. But I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with the formatting. I didn't see anything special on the page I was using a s abase, but I'm understanding this. Could someone help, please? Thanks. --[[User:Clonehunter\|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter\|talk]]) 18:37, 1 July 2015 (EDT)
	: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)		: It's not too bad, you certainly got the image thumbnails and text downpat; You've simply forgotten some formatting code and tags - The Table of Contents code (ex. <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki>) and the full break line clearing (<nowiki><br_clear=all></nowiki>) (this is stated on your talk page as well). Also Level 1 headings (<nowiki> =Example= </nowiki>) for the different weapon types, which I figure you should use if you have a page with three or more different types/groups of weapons and also categorization at the bottom of the page (Ex. <nowiki>[[Category:Video Game]]</nowiki>). I've fixed it up properly for you - Make note of the changes I've done and you should be fine for the most part on future pages. Also consult the [[IMFDB Style Guide]] for further help. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:52, 1 July 2015 (EDT)

			:: For the record, what is your basis for the S&W Model 24 ID? I only ask because unless it's specifically mentioned as that model (or that it only uses .44 Spls) it could easily be practically any N-frame S&W revolver. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 23:01, 1 July 2015 (EDT)