Talk:Nobody Loses All the Time - Revision history

MoviePropMaster2008: /* Discussion */

2012-01-12T23:59:39Z

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 12 January 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::: Alright, I can contact the creator of the short; what do you need? [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 16:46, 12 January 2012 (CST)		::: Alright, I can contact the creator of the short; what do you need? [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 16:46, 12 January 2012 (CST)
			::::Not to burst your bubble or anything, but it's NOT info from the creator that is required. It is neutral third party information, like IMDB listing where it was distributed, or what film festival it was shown at. ''' Also the fact that it seems to have no real guns in it, makes it an automatic delete for a film that is NOT a feature. ''' If you can provided independent sources that show that this film is available to the general public, through standard streams of commerce, NOT self distributed or shown free online, then I welcome the input. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 17:59, 12 January 2012 (CST)

BeardedHoplite: /* Discussion */

2012-01-12T22:46:55Z

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 12 January 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)		I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
	::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? (it looks like one of those cheap non firing replicas people buy in the mail) If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)		::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? (it looks like one of those cheap non firing replicas people buy in the mail) If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

			::: Alright, I can contact the creator of the short; what do you need? [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 16:46, 12 January 2012 (CST)

MoviePropMaster2008: /* Discussion */

2012-01-10T03:59:51Z

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 10 January 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)		I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
	::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)		::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? (it looks like one of those cheap non firing replicas people buy in the mail) If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 03:57, 10 January 2012

2012-01-10T03:57:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 10 January 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)		I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
			::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

BeardedHoplite at 21:26, 9 January 2012

2012-01-09T21:26:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 9 January 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Discussion==		==Discussion==
	Does this meet the standard for [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Short_films_must_meet_a_minimum_standard\|short films]]? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST)		Does this meet the standard for [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Short_films_must_meet_a_minimum_standard\|short films]]? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST)

			I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)

Funkychinaman at 06:02, 9 January 2012

2012-01-09T06:02:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 9 January 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==
			Does this meet the standard for [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Short_films_must_meet_a_minimum_standard\|short films]]? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST)

BeardedHoplite: Created page with "==Bonus! Signed poster== Along with a copy of the short, Mr. Travis sent me a autographed copy of the poster. ~~~~ 600px| ==Discussion=="

2012-01-09T00:19:49Z

Created page with "==Bonus! Signed poster== Along with a copy of the short, Mr. Travis sent me a autographed copy of the poster. ~~~~ thumb|none|600px| ==Discussion=="

New page

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 12 January 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)		I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
	::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? (it looks like one of those cheap non firing replicas people buy in the mail) If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)		::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? (it looks like one of those cheap non firing replicas people buy in the mail) If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

			::: Alright, I can contact the creator of the short; what do you need? [[User:BeardedHoplite\|BeardedHoplite]] 16:46, 12 January 2012 (CST)