Talk:NCIS: New Orleans - Season 7 - Revision history

AgentGumby: /* M61 really? */

2021-05-29T01:55:39Z

M61 really?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 29 May 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Why is there an M61 section when the gun is never seen? There's a picture of a plane and one plane that would have it except it's a gutted display. Unless you can actually see the cannon don't add it. Frankly, I'm opposed to adding aircraft guns unless you actually see them used. I'm removing the listing until somebody comes up with an actual reason that a weapon we never see should be added.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:37, 11 May 2021 (EDT)		Why is there an M61 section when the gun is never seen? There's a picture of a plane and one plane that would have it except it's a gutted display. Unless you can actually see the cannon don't add it. Frankly, I'm opposed to adding aircraft guns unless you actually see them used. I'm removing the listing until somebody comes up with an actual reason that a weapon we never see should be added.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:37, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
	: Actually I've moving the entire section here. Also, did no one tell the writers that the Navy doesn't fly the F-16, nor do the Marines have AH-64s?--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:39, 11 May 2021 (EDT)		: Actually I've moving the entire section here. Also, did no one tell the writers that the Navy doesn't fly the F-16, nor do the Marines have AH-64s?--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:39, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
			::Navy Aggressor squadrons have used the F-16 for some time actually, but in this case it still looks pretty inaccurate as the Navy Reserve is still using Legacy Hornets.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:55, 28 May 2021 (EDT)

	=Machine Guns=		=Machine Guns=

Mandolin: /* M61 really? */

2021-05-11T15:39:49Z

M61 really?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 11 May 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== M61 really? ==		== M61 really? ==
			Why is there an M61 section when the gun is never seen? There's a picture of a plane and one plane that would have it except it's a gutted display. Unless you can actually see the cannon don't add it. Frankly, I'm opposed to adding aircraft guns unless you actually see them used. I'm removing the listing until somebody comes up with an actual reason that a weapon we never see should be added.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:37, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
			: Actually I've moving the entire section here. Also, did no one tell the writers that the Navy doesn't fly the F-16, nor do the Marines have AH-64s?--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:39, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

			=Machine Guns=

			==M61 Vulcan==
			The [[M61 Vulcan]] is seen mounted on F/A-18 Hornets and F-16s.

			[[File:M61-FA-18.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|M61 Vulcan in the mounting used by the F/A-18 Hornet - 20x102mm]]
			[[File:NCISNOS7E03 00.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|The F/A-18 on display at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans entrance in "One of Our Own".]]
			[[File:NCISNOS7E06 03.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A printed photo of an F-16 in "Operation Drano, Part 2".]]

	~~Why~~ is ~~there an M61 section when the gun is never~~ seen~~? There's a picture of a plane and one plane that would have it except it's a gutted display. Unless you can actually see the cannon don't add it~~. ~~Frankly, I'm opposed to adding aircraft guns unless you actually see them used. I'm removing the listing until somebody comes up with an actual reason that a weapon we never see should be added.--~~[[~~User~~:~~Mandolin~~\|~~Mandolin~~]] ([[~~User talk~~:~~Mandolin~~\|~~talk~~]]~~) 11:37, 11 May 2021 (EDT)~~		==M230 Chain Gun==
			The [[M230 Chain Gun]] is seen mounted on AH-64 Apaches.

			[[Image:Hughes-M230-Chain-Gun1.jpg‎\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Hughes/Alliant Techsystems M230 chain gun - 30x113mm B.]]
			[[File:NCISNOS7E06 02.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A printed photo of an Apache in "Operation Drano, Part 2".]]

Mandolin: /* M61 really? */ new section

2021-05-11T15:37:19Z

M61 really?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 11 May 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Maybe the prop master doesn't have good P229 E2 replicas and it's not optimal to have the armorer on stand-by for every scene? Or am I just seeing things? Should the P228 prop be mentioned in the P229 section? --[[User:MonkGlonk\|MonkGlonk]] ([[User talk:MonkGlonk\|talk]]) 12:16, 3 March 2021 (EST)		Maybe the prop master doesn't have good P229 E2 replicas and it's not optimal to have the armorer on stand-by for every scene? Or am I just seeing things? Should the P228 prop be mentioned in the P229 section? --[[User:MonkGlonk\|MonkGlonk]] ([[User talk:MonkGlonk\|talk]]) 12:16, 3 March 2021 (EST)

			== M61 really? ==

			Why is there an M61 section when the gun is never seen? There's a picture of a plane and one plane that would have it except it's a gutted display. Unless you can actually see the cannon don't add it. Frankly, I'm opposed to adding aircraft guns unless you actually see them used. I'm removing the listing until somebody comes up with an actual reason that a weapon we never see should be added.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 11:37, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

MonkGlonk: /* SIG-Sauer P228 */ Forgot signature...

2021-03-03T17:16:55Z

SIG-Sauer P228: Forgot signature...

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 3 March 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I noticed that while the P228 has been changed to the P229 E2 for the action/shooting scenes, it appears that the P228, or most likely a plastic/rubber prop, can still be seen holstered by Pride, Lund and Carter when they don't actually need their guns. You can see the old style P228 grips while the new P229 obviously has the new/current E2 grips (most easily seen in the "Homeward Bound" pictures thanks to Scott Bakula's less than optimal grip).		I noticed that while the P228 has been changed to the P229 E2 for the action/shooting scenes, it appears that the P228, or most likely a plastic/rubber prop, can still be seen holstered by Pride, Lund and Carter when they don't actually need their guns. You can see the old style P228 grips while the new P229 obviously has the new/current E2 grips (most easily seen in the "Homeward Bound" pictures thanks to Scott Bakula's less than optimal grip).

	Maybe the prop master doesn't have good P229 E2 replicas and it's not optimal to have the armorer on stand-by for every scene? Or am I just seeing things? Should the P228 prop be mentioned in the P229 section?		Maybe the prop master doesn't have good P229 E2 replicas and it's not optimal to have the armorer on stand-by for every scene? Or am I just seeing things? Should the P228 prop be mentioned in the P229 section? --[[User:MonkGlonk\|MonkGlonk]] ([[User talk:MonkGlonk\|talk]]) 12:16, 3 March 2021 (EST)

MonkGlonk: P229/P228

2021-03-03T17:16:36Z

P229/P228

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 3 March 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[File:FNS-9.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|FN FNS-9 - 9x19mm]]		[[File:FNS-9.jpg\|thumb\|none\|300px\|FN FNS-9 - 9x19mm]]
	[[File:NCISNOS7E06 01.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|.]]		[[File:NCISNOS7E06 01.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|.]]

			== SIG-Sauer P228 ==
			I noticed that while the P228 has been changed to the P229 E2 for the action/shooting scenes, it appears that the P228, or most likely a plastic/rubber prop, can still be seen holstered by Pride, Lund and Carter when they don't actually need their guns. You can see the old style P228 grips while the new P229 obviously has the new/current E2 grips (most easily seen in the "Homeward Bound" pictures thanks to Scott Bakula's less than optimal grip).

			Maybe the prop master doesn't have good P229 E2 replicas and it's not optimal to have the armorer on stand-by for every scene? Or am I just seeing things? Should the P228 prop be mentioned in the P229 section?

MonkGlonk: Unknown suppressed pistol

2021-03-03T17:09:54Z

Unknown suppressed pistol

New page