Talk:M2 Flamethrower - Revision history

Greg-Z at 10:02, 10 December 2013

2013-12-10T10:02:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 10 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Additional Images ==
			[[File:M2 FlamethrowerWW.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|]]

			== Discussion ==
	I've been searching for years to find an M2 or M2A1-7 Flamethrower and I've never been able to find one is at least decent condition (I don't want to be the thing on thats on fire) and I know their legal in most southern states, including Florida. I mainly have two questions.		I've been searching for years to find an M2 or M2A1-7 Flamethrower and I've never been able to find one is at least decent condition (I don't want to be the thing on thats on fire) and I know their legal in most southern states, including Florida. I mainly have two questions.

Vangelis: Undo revision 386504 by 60.241.135.241 (Talk) What the hell does that have to do with anything?

2011-02-09T09:57:12Z

Undo revision 386504 by 60.241.135.241 (Talk) What the hell does that have to do with *anything*?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 9 February 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Does anybody know the dimensions of the M2 flame thrower? Like what the diameter of the back tanks are?		Does anybody know the dimensions of the M2 flame thrower? Like what the diameter of the back tanks are?

	~~==Anti-Carjacking Device==~~
	Believe it or not, I was watching an episode of Police Camera Action and I heard in South Africa, cars are fitted with a flamethrower right under the driver's door to stop carjackers which is activated by a press of a button inside your car.

60.241.135.241 at 09:44, 9 February 2011

2011-02-09T09:44:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 9 February 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Does anybody know the dimensions of the M2 flame thrower? Like what the diameter of the back tanks are?		Does anybody know the dimensions of the M2 flame thrower? Like what the diameter of the back tanks are?

			==Anti-Carjacking Device==
			Believe it or not, I was watching an episode of Police Camera Action and I heard in South Africa, cars are fitted with a flamethrower right under the driver's door to stop carjackers which is activated by a press of a button inside your car.

199.0.198.194 at 01:27, 30 October 2010

2010-10-30T01:27:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 30 October 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:::I think the other thing you should keep in mind, aside from how hard it is to locate such a weapon, is maintenance. If it is as difficult as you say to find a complete system how hard is it going to be to locate parts to keep the thing going? The tanks, hoses and firing mechanisms are probably just as rare individually as they are complete. --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 02:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		:::I think the other thing you should keep in mind, aside from how hard it is to locate such a weapon, is maintenance. If it is as difficult as you say to find a complete system how hard is it going to be to locate parts to keep the thing going? The tanks, hoses and firing mechanisms are probably just as rare individually as they are complete. --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 02:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

			Does anybody know the dimensions of the M2 flame thrower? Like what the diameter of the back tanks are?

Charon68 at 02:27, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T02:27:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 8 August 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
	::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

			:::I think the other thing you should keep in mind, aside from how hard it is to locate such a weapon, is maintenance. If it is as difficult as you say to find a complete system how hard is it going to be to locate parts to keep the thing going? The tanks, hoses and firing mechanisms are probably just as rare individually as they are complete. --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 02:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Kilgore at 02:13, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T02:13:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 8 August 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
			::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

StanTheMan at 01:35, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T01:35:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (~~which~~ would most ~~probably~~ be deactivated as ~~a weapon~~), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

StanTheMan at 01:34, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T01:34:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which ~~will be in good condition but~~ probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which would most probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

StanTheMan at 01:33, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T01:33:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- ~~Heh, burn the ice off of planes, that's funny. I would they would take a safer route and just use heaters. Anyway~~, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

StanTheMan at 01:32, 8 August 2010

2010-08-08T01:32:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory. You know, like nukes. ~~Anyway~~, I imagine it would be pretty hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a flamethrower (legitimately, anyway)?' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Heh, burn the ice off of planes, that's funny. I would they would take a safer route and just use heaters. Anyway, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 8 August 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
	::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

			:::I think the other thing you should keep in mind, aside from how hard it is to locate such a weapon, is maintenance. If it is as difficult as you say to find a complete system how hard is it going to be to locate parts to keep the thing going? The tanks, hoses and firing mechanisms are probably just as rare individually as they are complete. --[[User:Charon68\|Charon68]] 02:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 8 August 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
			::I know this is hard to belive, but flamethrowers are legal. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 02:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (~~which~~ would most ~~probably~~ be deactivated as ~~a weapon~~), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (where said FTs would most likely be deactivated as weapons), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which ~~will be in good condition but~~ probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which would most probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don't think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 8 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		- I imagine the ones in good condition that movie armories didn't buy (which was probably very few to begin with) are still kept in military inventory. Just a thought. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 21:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)		:But where do have a chance of finding one. A few may used in arctic and sub-arctic regions (ass-end of nowhere) to burn the ice off of aircrafts, but I can't go that far north for an 60 year-old flamethrower. - [[User:Kilgore\|Kilgore]] 21:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
	::- ~~Heh, burn the ice off of planes, that's funny. I would they would take a safer route and just use heaters. Anyway~~, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)		::- Well, I didn't say there were used, just that they were probably in inventory, sitting there in case we ever do need to use 'em. You know, like nukes. That said, I imagine it would be pretty damn hard to get a flamethrower that's in good ''operating'' condition, as I don't think they're really selling any as such. I guess they're just thinking 'Who the hell's gonna buy a live flamethrower? (legitimately, anyway)' In any case, outside of surplus military sale (which will be in good condition but probably be deactivated as a weapon), I don;t think you'll be able to buy one unless someone else who owns one comes off. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 01:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)