Talk:Lethal Weapon 3 - Revision history

Shoobe01: /* KTW Ammunition */ new section

2019-07-05T04:32:37Z

KTW Ammunition: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 5 July 2019
Line 73:		Line 73:
	I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket by the end of the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)		I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket by the end of the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)
	:Eh, it's referencing the mythical teflon-coated bullet, it already has properties not defined by actual physics. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 15:22, 18 December 2013 (EST)		:Eh, it's referencing the mythical teflon-coated bullet, it already has properties not defined by actual physics. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 15:22, 18 December 2013 (EST)

			== KTW Ammunition ==

			Surprised none of the discussions, much less the page itself, makes mention of the KTW ammunition.

			Super interesting ammunition, but mostly: it is all but in the movie. This article provides a bit of an overview, history of the scare over them, and photos/screenshots of the movie prop ammo boxes, as compared to the real KTW rounds. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/the-fear-of-teflon-coated-ammunition-the-story-ktw-winchester-and-hollywood/

			Seems worth including, but I leave that to someone who is a more regular contributor to do, or discuss, as I am not clear on the guidelines for odd stuff like ammunition, or the limits of discussing the reality vs. the in-movie use of something like this.
			[[User:Shoobe01\|Shoobe01]] ([[User talk:Shoobe01\|talk]]) 00:32, 5 July 2019 (EDT)

Evil Tim: /* Inconsistent AP ammo */

2013-12-18T20:22:50Z

Inconsistent AP ammo

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 18 December 2013
Line 72:		Line 72:
	==Inconsistent AP ammo==		==Inconsistent AP ammo==
	I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket by the end of the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)		I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket by the end of the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)
			:Eh, it's referencing the mythical teflon-coated bullet, it already has properties not defined by actual physics. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 15:22, 18 December 2013 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Inconsistent AP ammo */

2013-12-18T20:11:29Z

Inconsistent AP ammo

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 18 December 2013
Line 71:		Line 71:

	==Inconsistent AP ammo==		==Inconsistent AP ammo==
	I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket ~~later in~~ the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)		I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket by the end of the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)

StanTheMan at 02:50, 18 December 2013

2013-12-18T02:50:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 18 December 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

	: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I ~~have to agree~~, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)		: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I concur, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)
	[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]		[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]

			==Inconsistent AP ammo==
			I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket later in the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Murtaugh's S&W auto */

2013-12-18T02:45:03Z

Murtaugh's S&W auto

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 18 December 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

	: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A ~~probably~~ better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)		: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)
	[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]		[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]

Ben41: /* Murtaugh's S&W auto */

2013-12-18T02:44:29Z

Murtaugh's S&W auto

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 18 December 2013
Line 68:		Line 68:

	: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A probably better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)		: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A probably better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)
			[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]

StanTheMan at 02:43, 18 December 2013

2013-12-18T02:43:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 18 December 2013
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

			: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A probably better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)

Commando552: /* Murtaugh's S&W auto */ new section

2012-09-04T10:20:49Z

Murtaugh's S&W auto: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 4 September 2012
Line 62:		Line 62:
	::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	:::At least it has a sesame seed bun --[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)		:::At least it has a sesame seed bun --[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)

			== Murtaugh's S&W auto ==

			Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

Gtcsmc: /* Cobray M11/9 Quote */

2012-01-04T18:16:09Z

Cobray M11/9 Quote

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 4 January 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	:::At least it has a sesame seed bun--[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)		:::At least it has a sesame seed bun --[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)

Gtcsmc: /* Cobray M11/9 Quote */

2012-01-04T18:15:53Z

Cobray M11/9 Quote

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 4 January 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
			:::At least it has a sesame seed bun--[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 18 December 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

	: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I ~~have to agree~~, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)		: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I concur, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)
	[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]		[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]

			==Inconsistent AP ammo==
			I always find it funny how these so called 'armor-piercing bullets' seem to change in power throughout the film. The 9mm bullets that weren't powerful enough to make it through the armored car windshield can punch through a loader bucket later in the film, and of course two vests supposedly stopping a .44 Mag of one of those when a 9mm one punched clean through a single vest. Of course its just a silly oversight in a cheeser buddy-cop action flick but hey, always noticed it - it half irks me and half amuses me, heh. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 18 December 2013
Line 67:		Line 67:
	Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)		Does anyone else think that this might actually be a [[Smith & Wesson 5903\|5903]] rather than a [[Smith & Wesson 5906\|5906]]? In the first picture in particular there appears to be a distinct different in the colour of the frame and the slide just like on the alloy framed 5903. Also, although the image we have has the later rounded trigger guard there were early models of the gun with the hooked one just like the 5906. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 05:20, 4 September 2012 (CDT)

	: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A ~~probably~~ better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)		: I have to say that I agree with you. There seems to be a slight difference in frame and slide on the other pictures as well, though its considerably harder to tell. Still, I have to agree, I also think it may be a 5903. Why its there and not the 5906 would be another story.. Of course, its certainly possible they didn't have the 5906 (Though I don't see why they wouldn't just keep using the 5906 from the [[Lethal Weapon 2\|2nd film]]). A better possibility is that perhaps they changed it to a newer gun in the series, much like they changed from a 92F to a 92FS for Gibson/Riggs. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:43, 17 December 2013 (EST)
	[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]		[[File:LethalW3 370.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|Murtaugh takes out his S&W 5906 before going on patrol.]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 4 January 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	:::At least it has a sesame seed bun--[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)		:::At least it has a sesame seed bun --[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 4 January 2012
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		:- I suppose it could, but I myself would be against posting it since part of it is inaccurate. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] 20:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
	::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)		::Yeah since it's incorrect, it really shouldn't be used. I hate even seeing the ones with "clip" in them. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 20:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
			:::At least it has a sesame seed bun--[[User:Gtcsmc\|Gtcsmc]] 12:15, 4 January 2012 (CST)