Talk:Left Behind: The Movie - Revision history

StanTheMan at 01:40, 31 January 2017

2017-01-31T01:40:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 31 January 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)		:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)
	The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)		The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)
			: I agree about the flash-paper gun in the last cap. That said, tough to tell but looks like there is a shell deflector on the rifle in the second cap. Could really do with some sharper pics in the event to be more certain. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 20:40, 30 January 2017 (EST)

Funkychinaman at 12:29, 30 January 2017

2017-01-30T12:29:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 30 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)		:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)
	:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)		:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)
			The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)

StanTheMan at 07:05, 30 January 2017

2017-01-30T07:05:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 30 January 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)		:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
	:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)		:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)
			:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)

MrMiracle at 00:43, 24 August 2013

2013-08-24T00:43:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 24 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)		The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
	:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)		:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
			:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)

Mr.Ice at 19:19, 13 July 2013

2013-07-13T19:19:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 13 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)		The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
			:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)

Greg-Z: Created page with "The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. ~~~~"

2013-07-13T19:09:10Z

Created page with "The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. ~~~~"

New page

The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 31 January 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)		:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)
	The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)		The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)
			: I agree about the flash-paper gun in the last cap. That said, tough to tell but looks like there is a shell deflector on the rifle in the second cap. Could really do with some sharper pics in the event to be more certain. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 20:40, 30 January 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 30 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)		:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)
	:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)		:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)
			The M16A2 is missing a brass deflector, and the last cap appears to show a flash paper gun anyway. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2017 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 30 January 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)		:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice\|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice\|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
	:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)		:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle\|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle\|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)
			:: Between the suppressor, bit of visible forend and particularly the prominent ghost-ring style front sight, I think the 'unknown rifle' might be an MP5SD. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (EST)