Talk:Judgment - Revision history

Eddiehimself at 15:34, 4 August 2019

2019-08-04T15:34:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 4 August 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. There's also the Novak sights, which likewise weren't used on the pre-3rd gen guns (at least not that I'm aware). The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This gun is - or at least best resembles - a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. There's also the Novak sights, which likewise weren't used on the pre-3rd gen guns (at least not that I'm aware). The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This gun is - or at least best resembles - a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
			::That sounds like a good call. It also makes sense in terms of context that Japanese detectives are unlikely to need some full-size double-stack model; that's more what an SAT officer would have. [[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 11:34, 4 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan: Sixth time lucky? :P

2019-08-03T03:02:35Z

Sixth time lucky? :P

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. There's also the Novak sights, which likewise weren't used on the pre-3rd gen guns (at least not that I'm aware). The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This best resembles a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. There's also the Novak sights, which likewise weren't used on the pre-3rd gen guns (at least not that I'm aware). The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This gun is - or at least best resembles - a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan at 03:01, 3 August 2019

2019-08-03T03:01:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This best resembles a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. There's also the Novak sights, which likewise weren't used on the pre-3rd gen guns (at least not that I'm aware). The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This best resembles a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan at 02:56, 3 August 2019

2019-08-03T02:56:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This ~~is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely~~ a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x OR a 639, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and in the former case as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This best resembles a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan at 02:53, 3 August 2019

2019-08-03T02:53:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a strictly 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan: Pff, games do that kinda thing anyway, nevermind

2019-08-03T02:53:39Z

Pff, games do that kinda thing anyway, nevermind

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
	: The wraparound grips are a 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]~~. As for the forward serrations it's not a standard feature but I've seen 'em on several models - By itself though it means nothing in terms of a general ID though~~. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		: The wraparound grips are a 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

StanTheMan at 02:51, 3 August 2019

2019-08-03T02:51:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 3 August 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:
	So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.		So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
	[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)		[[User:Eddiehimself\|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself\|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)
			: The wraparound grips are a 3rd Generation feature - Earlier S&W autos like the 639 don't have them. The blued controls (trigger and hammer) are also indicative, as they were used on later-made 3rd Gen stainless/alloy autos. <BR> Having said that the gun is quite clearly NOT a 590x, it's not nearly big enough in either slide or grip lengths and as noted (in a rather contradictory fashion) it also clearly lacks the frame bulge. This is one of the compact single-stack guns, mostly likely a [[Smith & Wesson\|3913]]. As for the forward serrations it's not a standard feature but I've seen 'em on several models - By itself though it means nothing in terms of a general ID though. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 22:51, 2 August 2019 (EDT)

Eddiehimself: Created page with "==S&W semi-auto model== So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a doub..."

2019-08-03T00:12:05Z

Created page with "==S&W semi-auto model== So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a doub..."

New page

==S&W semi-auto model==
So yo, the reason I identified it as a 639 was because of the lack of any kind of widening towards the rear end of the frame that would indicate a double-stack S&W model like the 659, 5903 or otherwise. I get your point about the patterning on the grips, but I'm not sure it's enough to identify the 5903 by itself. I think maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between these models.
[[User:Eddiehimself|Eddiehimself]] ([[User talk:Eddiehimself|talk]]) 20:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)