Talk:Jericho (2006) - Revision history

Ben41: Ben41 moved page Talk:Jericho to Talk:Jericho (2006)

2015-03-12T19:23:53Z

Ben41 moved page Talk:Jericho to Talk:Jericho (2006)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:23, 12 March 2015
(No difference)

Ben41 at 12:20, 9 March 2015

2015-03-09T12:20:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 9 March 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Note no iron sights or scope		Note no iron sights or scope

			===Unknown Double-Barrel Shotgun===

			In the episode "Crossroads", Stanley has what appears to be some kind of double-barrel shotgun when he confronts the Ravenwood mercenaries. Due to the darkness and long view, identification is next to impossible.

Ben41 at 12:33, 19 April 2012

2012-04-19T12:33:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 19 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===Others (entries pending)===
			[[Image:Jericho-rifle-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|[[Henry 1860]] It's actually a non-firing replica of a Henry .44. You can tell by the faux worn finish.]]
			[[Image:Jericho-guns-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|(right to left) Benelli M3, Winchester 1873, M1 carbine.]]
			[[Image:Jericho-guns-4.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|(Right to left) Henry, Remington 700P, M1 Carbine, M16A1.]] Note no iron sights or scope on Remington
			[[Image:Jericho-guns-5.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|(right to left) Benelli M3, Jimmy with a Mossberg 500, Gray Anderson with a Winchester Model 70, Henry, M16A1.]]
			[[Image:Jericho-guns-7.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Winchester Model 70 or possibly a Browning A-Bolt.]] - Could it be a Savage?
			Note no iron sights or scope



	==L85A1==		==L85A1==
	How in the world would a ''civilian'' in the ''US'' manage to get their hands on one of these things? I mean, to my knowledge there's no semi-auto civvy version and no US governmental or law enforcement agencies use it. The SCAR is similarly out of place but at least ''plausible''... Is it perhaps safe to assume that both of the above guns, like the HK416 in the hands of the US Marine NCO, is a mistake on the armorer's part? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 08:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)		How in the world would a ''civilian'' in the ''US'' manage to get their hands on one of these things? I mean, to my knowledge there's no semi-auto civvy version and no US governmental or law enforcement agencies use it. The SCAR is similarly out of place but at least ''plausible''... Is it perhaps safe to assume that both of the above guns, like the HK416 in the hands of the US Marine NCO, is a mistake on the armorer's part? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 08:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Spartan198: /* HK416 is not HK416 */

2012-01-02T08:39:10Z

HK416 is not HK416

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 2 January 2012
Line 47:		Line 47:

	::Who do you think added it? :D [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 1 January 2012 (CST)		::Who do you think added it? :D [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 1 January 2012 (CST)

			:::Seemed like it had been there for quite a while, though. I'd known that was a Chieftain for some time. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 02:39, 2 January 2012 (CST)

	==Foley goof==		==Foley goof==

Evil Tim: /* HK416 is not HK416 */

2012-01-01T11:23:47Z

HK416 is not HK416

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 1 January 2012
Line 45:		Line 45:

	:Isn't that already pointed out on the main page somewhere? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 20:34, 31 December 2011 (CST)		:Isn't that already pointed out on the main page somewhere? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 20:34, 31 December 2011 (CST)

			::Who do you think added it? :D [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 1 January 2012 (CST)

	==Foley goof==		==Foley goof==

Spartan198: /* HK416 is not HK416 */

2012-01-01T02:34:21Z

HK416 is not HK416

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 1 January 2012
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Because Afghanistan isn't US soil. It wasn't SOF conducting the investigation into the 9/11 bombings. I'm fed up of this argument and you're getting too tetchy about me saying you have an attitude, which from my perspective you do as you never once asked about what I meant you just jumped down my throat accusing me of never seeing the show. And if you notice I did mention that it was most likely a strange continuity error as a HK416 would be a lot rarer in a Hollywood armourers than an M4. It's possible that the HK416 used was one of the ones used in The Unit as they most likely used the same armourers because they are both made by CBS. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] 08:56, 29 June 2011 (CDT)		Because Afghanistan isn't US soil. It wasn't SOF conducting the investigation into the 9/11 bombings. I'm fed up of this argument and you're getting too tetchy about me saying you have an attitude, which from my perspective you do as you never once asked about what I meant you just jumped down my throat accusing me of never seeing the show. And if you notice I did mention that it was most likely a strange continuity error as a HK416 would be a lot rarer in a Hollywood armourers than an M4. It's possible that the HK416 used was one of the ones used in The Unit as they most likely used the same armourers because they are both made by CBS. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] 08:56, 29 June 2011 (CDT)

			:I didn't then and don't now have any attitude, nor was I jumping down your throat or acting "high and mighty" or anything else. I posted this section of the talk page regarding a continuity error, then you popped in and started talking, out of the blue, about SOF posing as Marines. Nothing of the sort occurred in the show. Please tell me where you got this from? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 20:34, 31 December 2011 (CST)

	*In other news, fakey Abrams back there with single-pin treads is a British Chieftain. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 09:04, 29 June 2011 (CDT)		*In other news, fakey Abrams back there with single-pin treads is a British Chieftain. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 09:04, 29 June 2011 (CDT)

			:Isn't that already pointed out on the main page somewhere? [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 20:34, 31 December 2011 (CST)

	==Foley goof==		==Foley goof==

Balin21: /* Stanley Richmond Shotgun */ new section

2011-12-31T20:48:53Z

Stanley Richmond Shotgun: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 31 December 2011
Line 76:		Line 76:

	However I am completely unable to match the camo pattern to any of the dozen or more variations presented by the Mossberg company. Mossy Oak, Realtree, Duck Blind, HD Green Camo, Hardwoods, etc. none of them match. I'm assuming it was a customized, individual paint job for this individual shotgun, further suggested by the fact that the bolt looks to be painted as well rather than left bare.		However I am completely unable to match the camo pattern to any of the dozen or more variations presented by the Mossberg company. Mossy Oak, Realtree, Duck Blind, HD Green Camo, Hardwoods, etc. none of them match. I'm assuming it was a customized, individual paint job for this individual shotgun, further suggested by the fact that the bolt looks to be painted as well rather than left bare.

			== Stanley Richmond Shotgun ==

			I just watched the series again and noticed the stanley and his sister use a winchester 1912 shotgun i believe.

Ballistics Expert2: /* Camo shotgun identification */

2011-08-24T00:58:25Z

Camo shotgun identification

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 24 August 2011
Line 73:		Line 73:
	== Camo shotgun identification ==		== Camo shotgun identification ==

	~~The~~ shotgun with the ~~treeline~~ camouflage pattern is ~~indeed~~ a Mossberg 500 ~~and not~~ a Mossberg ~~835~~. ~~The~~ barrel retaining screw ~~is too small and flat~~ to be of the ~~835 variety~~.		From what I can tell the shotgun with the camouflage pattern paint job is a Mossberg 500 (mostly due to the unlikelyhood of movie armorers spending the money to acquire a Mossberg 535 chambered for the 3.5" round) due to the barrel retaining screw, which doesn't match the one on the model 835.

			However I am completely unable to match the camo pattern to any of the dozen or more variations presented by the Mossberg company. Mossy Oak, Realtree, Duck Blind, HD Green Camo, Hardwoods, etc. none of them match. I'm assuming it was a customized, individual paint job for this individual shotgun, further suggested by the fact that the bolt looks to be painted as well rather than left bare.

Ballistics Expert2: /* Camo shotgun identification */ new section

2011-08-21T23:14:08Z

Camo shotgun identification: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 21 August 2011
Line 70:		Line 70:

	:No, that's a PMAG. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 22:25, 26 June 2011 (CDT)		:No, that's a PMAG. [[User:Spartan198\|Spartan198]] 22:25, 26 June 2011 (CDT)

			== Camo shotgun identification ==

			The shotgun with the treeline camouflage pattern is indeed a Mossberg 500 and not a Mossberg 835. The barrel retaining screw is too small and flat to be of the 835 variety.

Evil Tim: /* HK416 is not HK416 */

2011-06-29T14:04:22Z

HK416 is not HK416

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 29 June 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Because Afghanistan isn't US soil. It wasn't SOF conducting the investigation into the 9/11 bombings. I'm fed up of this argument and you're getting too tetchy about me saying you have an attitude, which from my perspective you do as you never once asked about what I meant you just jumped down my throat accusing me of never seeing the show. And if you notice I did mention that it was most likely a strange continuity error as a HK416 would be a lot rarer in a Hollywood armourers than an M4. It's possible that the HK416 used was one of the ones used in The Unit as they most likely used the same armourers because they are both made by CBS. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] 08:56, 29 June 2011 (CDT)		Because Afghanistan isn't US soil. It wasn't SOF conducting the investigation into the 9/11 bombings. I'm fed up of this argument and you're getting too tetchy about me saying you have an attitude, which from my perspective you do as you never once asked about what I meant you just jumped down my throat accusing me of never seeing the show. And if you notice I did mention that it was most likely a strange continuity error as a HK416 would be a lot rarer in a Hollywood armourers than an M4. It's possible that the HK416 used was one of the ones used in The Unit as they most likely used the same armourers because they are both made by CBS. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] 08:56, 29 June 2011 (CDT)

			*In other news, fakey Abrams back there with single-pin treads is a British Chieftain. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] 09:04, 29 June 2011 (CDT)

	==Foley goof==		==Foley goof==