Talk:Hotel Rwanda - Revision history

Slemke1998: /* Beretta 92 Section */

2019-07-26T05:57:50Z

Beretta 92 Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 26 July 2019
Line 24:		Line 24:

	If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi\|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)		If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi\|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
	:I know this is old so I'm not expecting a response but I believe that whoever made that thinks that the 92 actually came out in 1992, hence the comment about 1994. In reality the 92 was borderline obsolete by 94. --[[User:Slemke1998\|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998\|talk]]) 01:43, 26 July 2019 (EDT)		:I know this is old so I'm not expecting a response but I believe that whoever made that thinks that the 92 actually came out in 1992, hence the comment about 1994. In reality the 92 was borderline obsolete by 94.Also in the section about the FN MAG the caption about right/left hand drive is off, "right hand drive" refers to the location of the steering wheel, not the flow of traffic so in a country that drives on the left side of the road, vehicles are right hand drive --[[User:Slemke1998\|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998\|talk]]) 01:43, 26 July 2019 (EDT)

Slemke1998: /* Beretta 92 Section */

2019-07-26T05:43:43Z

Beretta 92 Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 26 July 2019
Line 24:		Line 24:

	If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi\|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)		If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi\|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
			:I know this is old so I'm not expecting a response but I believe that whoever made that thinks that the 92 actually came out in 1992, hence the comment about 1994. In reality the 92 was borderline obsolete by 94. --[[User:Slemke1998\|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998\|talk]]) 01:43, 26 July 2019 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 15:49, 25 June 2012

2012-06-25T15:49:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 25 June 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:This one with the Beta-C drum looks like some kind of M16 variant. You can see the fore end of the weapon in that familiar tube and the rear sights. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)		:This one with the Beta-C drum looks like some kind of M16 variant. You can see the fore end of the weapon in that familiar tube and the rear sights. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
	::Could it be an FNC? That would be standard issue.-[[User:RedJedRevolver\|RedJedRevolver]] 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)		::Could it be an FNC? That would be standard issue.-[[User:RedJedRevolver\|RedJedRevolver]] 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
	~~[[Category:Movie]]~~
	~~[[Category:War]]~~
	Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).[[User:SAWGunner89\|SAWGunner89]] 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)		Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).[[User:SAWGunner89\|SAWGunner89]] 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Wolf: /* Beretta 92FS */

2011-10-24T00:57:32Z

Beretta 92FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 24 October 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	It could be a Centurion --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)		It could be a Centurion --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

			:No, it's too long to be a Centurion, it's a regular 92FS. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 19:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)

	== MG3 ==		== MG3 ==

Rebusdi: /* Beretta 92 Section */ new section

2011-10-23T23:57:13Z

Beretta 92 Section: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 23 October 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:

	It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page		It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page

			== Beretta 92 Section ==

			If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi\|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)

67.86.148.125: /* MG3 */ new section

2010-06-18T00:51:48Z

MG3: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 18 June 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	It could be a Centurion --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)		It could be a Centurion --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

			== MG3 ==

			It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page

AdAstra2009 at 07:09, 29 December 2009

2009-12-29T07:09:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 29 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	[[Category:War]]		[[Category:War]]
	Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).[[User:SAWGunner89\|SAWGunner89]] 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)		Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).[[User:SAWGunner89\|SAWGunner89]] 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

			==Beretta 92FS==
			[[Image:HRBeretta92FS-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|A Interahamwe sticks his Beretta 92FS in Paul's face.]]

			It could be a Centurion --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

AdAstra2009: New page: ==Unknowns== '''[moved from main page]''' --~~~~ Guns I can't even guess the make and model of. [[Image:HRunknown-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As if the distance didn't make it hard enough, this...

2009-12-24T02:32:11Z

New page: ==Unknowns== '''[moved from main page]''' --~~~~ Guns I can't even guess the make and model of. [[Image:HRunknown-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As if the distance didn't make it hard enough, this...

New page

==Unknowns==
'''[moved from main page]''' --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 02:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Guns I can't even guess the make and model of.
[[Image:HRunknown-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As if the distance didn't make it hard enough, this gun looks like nothing I've seen.]]
it looks slightly like a High standard M10 but the barrel is to long and it has a stock both features a non-existent on all the models of this gun that I've ever seen.
[[Image:HRunknown-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Belgians UN soldier with an unknown LMG, noted by carry handle. Note Beta-C drum magazine.]]
:This one with the Beta-C drum looks like some kind of M16 variant. You can see the fore end of the weapon in that familiar tube and the rear sights. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
::Could it be an FNC? That would be standard issue.-[[User:RedJedRevolver|RedJedRevolver]] 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
[[Category:Movie]]
[[Category:War]]
Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).[[User:SAWGunner89|SAWGunner89]] 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)