Talk:George of the Jungle - Revision history

AdAstra2009 at 01:26, 13 October 2010

2010-10-13T01:26:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 13 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Winchester Model 70==		==Winchester Model 70==
	:The first rifle may be a Model 70, but the tranq. rifle isn't. It even appears to have a magazine tube (it has the twist cap at the end too) so it must be something else. - [[User:Gunmaster45\|Gunmaster45]]		:The first rifle may be a Model 70, but the tranq. rifle isn't. It even appears to have a magazine tube (it has the twist cap at the end too) so it must be something else. - [[User:Gunmaster45\|Gunmaster45]]
			I was about to post about this --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 01:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
	==Smith & Wesson M&P?==		==Smith & Wesson M&P?==
	Uh, no. That is definitely NOT an S&W M&P. unless there is a better shot showing specifically that someone put the wrong grips on an M&P that is NOT an M&P. the M&P had a recessed section for the top of the grips. That has a standard Model 10 style grip. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		Uh, no. That is definitely NOT an S&W M&P. unless there is a better shot showing specifically that someone put the wrong grips on an M&P that is NOT an M&P. the M&P had a recessed section for the top of the grips. That has a standard Model 10 style grip. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

AdAstra2009 at 15:23, 16 August 2010

2010-08-16T15:23:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 16 August 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Featured Article?==		==Featured Article?==
	I'm all for some variety in the feature articles. But I don't think something like this is feature worthy. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)		I'm all for some variety in the feature articles. But I don't think something like this is feature worthy. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
			:I agree, the screen shots have no cinematic quality to them -your an admin, you should take this off the featured article page. --[[User:AdAstra2009\|AdAstra2009]] 15:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Predator20 at 01:16, 16 August 2010

2010-08-16T01:16:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 16 August 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Featured Article?==		==Featured Article?==
	I'm all for some variety in the feature articles. But I don't think something like this feature worthy. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)		I'm all for some variety in the feature articles. But I don't think something like this is feature worthy. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Predator20 at 01:15, 16 August 2010

2010-08-16T01:15:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 16 August 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Smith & Wesson M&P?==		==Smith & Wesson M&P?==
	Uh, no. That is definitely NOT an S&W M&P. unless there is a better shot showing specifically that someone put the wrong grips on an M&P that is NOT an M&P. the M&P had a recessed section for the top of the grips. That has a standard Model 10 style grip. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)		Uh, no. That is definitely NOT an S&W M&P. unless there is a better shot showing specifically that someone put the wrong grips on an M&P that is NOT an M&P. the M&P had a recessed section for the top of the grips. That has a standard Model 10 style grip. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

			==Featured Article?==
			I'm all for some variety in the feature articles. But I don't think something like this feature worthy. --[[User:Predator20\|Predator20]] 01:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 06:05, 6 August 2010

2010-08-06T06:05:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 6 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Winchester Model 70==		==Winchester Model 70==
	:The first rifle may be a Model 70, but the tranq. rifle isn't. It even appears to have a magazine tube (it has the twist cap at the end too) so it must be something else. - [[User:Gunmaster45\|Gunmaster45]]		:The first rifle may be a Model 70, but the tranq. rifle isn't. It even appears to have a magazine tube (it has the twist cap at the end too) so it must be something else. - [[User:Gunmaster45\|Gunmaster45]]

			==Smith & Wesson M&P?==
			Uh, no. That is definitely NOT an S&W M&P. unless there is a better shot showing specifically that someone put the wrong grips on an M&P that is NOT an M&P. the M&P had a recessed section for the top of the grips. That has a standard Model 10 style grip. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Kenny99: talk page please

2009-09-19T19:42:06Z

talk page please

New page

==Winchester Model 70==
:The first rifle may be a Model 70, but the tranq. rifle isn't. It even appears to have a magazine tube (it has the twist cap at the end too) so it must be something else. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]