Talk:Far Cry 3 - Revision history

Wuzh: /* Just to be clear */

2022-02-05T21:37:34Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 5 February 2022
Line 462:		Line 462:
	::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)		::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)
	::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

			Late reply, but I think Slon95's main complaint is that the page is locked ("Pentagon-level access status"), not "your shotgun identification is wrong". --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 16:37, 5 February 2022 (EST)

Greg-Z: /* 416 might not be a 416 */ Correct file name

2022-02-02T11:49:38Z

416 might not be a 416: Correct file name

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 2 February 2022
Line 253:		Line 253:

	[[Image:POFAR-15.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]		[[Image:POFAR-15.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]
	[[Image:FC3-~~HK416~~-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]		[[Image:FC3-P416-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]

	:Yeah, that does look like it. The "extra thing" is a [http://www.knsprecisioninc.com/gun-parts-and-accessories/trigger-hammer-pins/m-p15-22-non-rotate-trigger-hammer-pins-gen-2-black.html KNS Precision non-rotating trigger hammer pin] set, it's a little bit of metal on each side that joins replacement trigger and hammer pins together and prevents them from rotating to decrease wear. They're also right with the title, the select fire version seems to be referred to as Patriot Ordinance Factory 416, POF416 or P416 (the semi-auto version being P415). Sneaky! [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 02:30, 4 December 2012 (EST)		:Yeah, that does look like it. The "extra thing" is a [http://www.knsprecisioninc.com/gun-parts-and-accessories/trigger-hammer-pins/m-p15-22-non-rotate-trigger-hammer-pins-gen-2-black.html KNS Precision non-rotating trigger hammer pin] set, it's a little bit of metal on each side that joins replacement trigger and hammer pins together and prevents them from rotating to decrease wear. They're also right with the title, the select fire version seems to be referred to as Patriot Ordinance Factory 416, POF416 or P416 (the semi-auto version being P415). Sneaky! [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 02:30, 4 December 2012 (EST)

TheExplodingBarrel: /* Just to be clear */

2021-11-07T03:30:46Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 7 November 2021
Line 460:		Line 460:
	::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)		::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)
	:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)		:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)
			::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)
			::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

Kadorhal: /* Just to be clear */

2020-05-23T19:53:39Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 23 May 2020
Line 459:		Line 459:
	::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)		::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)
	::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)		::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)
			:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)

Slon95: /* Just to be clear */

2020-04-27T22:27:22Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 27 April 2020
Line 458:		Line 458:
	:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)		:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
	::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)		::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)
			::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)

Slon95: /* Just to be clear */

2020-04-26T18:47:17Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 26 April 2020
Line 457:		Line 457:
	::I mean it's kinda basic to switch over? Rename the section to Remington 870, say it's been misidentified as a Baikal MP-133 and move on. It doesn't really seem like a perfect match for either gun honestly. The receiver is a match for either shotgun, the trigger guard is a Remington style but everything else beyond the hand guard could go either way. It looks more like someone repaired a Baikal with Remington parts. --[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 14:07, 29 April 2019 (EST)		::I mean it's kinda basic to switch over? Rename the section to Remington 870, say it's been misidentified as a Baikal MP-133 and move on. It doesn't really seem like a perfect match for either gun honestly. The receiver is a match for either shotgun, the trigger guard is a Remington style but everything else beyond the hand guard could go either way. It looks more like someone repaired a Baikal with Remington parts. --[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 14:07, 29 April 2019 (EST)
	:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)		:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
			::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)

AgentGumby: /* Just to be clear */

2019-04-30T01:01:30Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 30 April 2019
Line 456:		Line 456:

	::I mean it's kinda basic to switch over? Rename the section to Remington 870, say it's been misidentified as a Baikal MP-133 and move on. It doesn't really seem like a perfect match for either gun honestly. The receiver is a match for either shotgun, the trigger guard is a Remington style but everything else beyond the hand guard could go either way. It looks more like someone repaired a Baikal with Remington parts. --[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 14:07, 29 April 2019 (EST)		::I mean it's kinda basic to switch over? Rename the section to Remington 870, say it's been misidentified as a Baikal MP-133 and move on. It doesn't really seem like a perfect match for either gun honestly. The receiver is a match for either shotgun, the trigger guard is a Remington style but everything else beyond the hand guard could go either way. It looks more like someone repaired a Baikal with Remington parts. --[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 14:07, 29 April 2019 (EST)
			:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

PaperCake at 18:06, 29 April 2019

2019-04-29T18:06:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 29 April 2019
Line 454:		Line 454:
	MP133 is not at all. This is Remington 870 as it is, just renamed to M133 at the last moment. The same with the Far Cry 4. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 12:24, 28 April 2019 (EDT)		MP133 is not at all. This is Remington 870 as it is, just renamed to M133 at the last moment. The same with the Far Cry 4. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 12:24, 28 April 2019 (EDT)
	:So what are we going to do about it? --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 09:34, 29 April 2019 (EDT)		:So what are we going to do about it? --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 09:34, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

			::I mean it's kinda basic to switch over? Rename the section to Remington 870, say it's been misidentified as a Baikal MP-133 and move on. It doesn't really seem like a perfect match for either gun honestly. The receiver is a match for either shotgun, the trigger guard is a Remington style but everything else beyond the hand guard could go either way. It looks more like someone repaired a Baikal with Remington parts. --[[User:PaperCake\|PaperCake]] 14:07, 29 April 2019 (EST)

Slon95: /* Just to be clear */

2019-04-29T13:34:12Z

Just to be clear

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 29 April 2019
Line 453:		Line 453:

	MP133 is not at all. This is Remington 870 as it is, just renamed to M133 at the last moment. The same with the Far Cry 4. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 12:24, 28 April 2019 (EDT)		MP133 is not at all. This is Remington 870 as it is, just renamed to M133 at the last moment. The same with the Far Cry 4. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 12:24, 28 April 2019 (EDT)
			:So what are we going to do about it? --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 09:34, 29 April 2019 (EDT)

Slon95: /* Just to be clear */ new section

2019-04-28T16:24:10Z

Just to be clear: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 28 April 2019
Line 449:		Line 449:
	:Can somebody unlock the page? SVD-M in reference to the SVD with synthetic furniture is an erroneous terminology that doesn't exist in real life. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 06:58, 5 January 2019 (EST)		:Can somebody unlock the page? SVD-M in reference to the SVD with synthetic furniture is an erroneous terminology that doesn't exist in real life. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 06:58, 5 January 2019 (EST)
	::Are you deciding that terms used across the wiki don't exist without consulting anyone again? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 13:37, 5 January 2019 (EST)		::Are you deciding that terms used across the wiki don't exist without consulting anyone again? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 13:37, 5 January 2019 (EST)

			== Just to be clear ==

			MP133 is not at all. This is Remington 870 as it is, just renamed to M133 at the last moment. The same with the Far Cry 4. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 12:24, 28 April 2019 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 5 February 2022
Line 462:		Line 462:
	::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)		::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)
	::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

			Late reply, but I think Slon95's main complaint is that the page is locked ("Pentagon-level access status"), not "your shotgun identification is wrong". --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 16:37, 5 February 2022 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 2 February 2022
Line 253:		Line 253:

	[[Image:POFAR-15.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]		[[Image:POFAR-15.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]
	[[Image:FC3-~~HK416~~-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]		[[Image:FC3-P416-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|700px\|]]

	:Yeah, that does look like it. The "extra thing" is a [http://www.knsprecisioninc.com/gun-parts-and-accessories/trigger-hammer-pins/m-p15-22-non-rotate-trigger-hammer-pins-gen-2-black.html KNS Precision non-rotating trigger hammer pin] set, it's a little bit of metal on each side that joins replacement trigger and hammer pins together and prevents them from rotating to decrease wear. They're also right with the title, the select fire version seems to be referred to as Patriot Ordinance Factory 416, POF416 or P416 (the semi-auto version being P415). Sneaky! [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 02:30, 4 December 2012 (EST)		:Yeah, that does look like it. The "extra thing" is a [http://www.knsprecisioninc.com/gun-parts-and-accessories/trigger-hammer-pins/m-p15-22-non-rotate-trigger-hammer-pins-gen-2-black.html KNS Precision non-rotating trigger hammer pin] set, it's a little bit of metal on each side that joins replacement trigger and hammer pins together and prevents them from rotating to decrease wear. They're also right with the title, the select fire version seems to be referred to as Patriot Ordinance Factory 416, POF416 or P416 (the semi-auto version being P415). Sneaky! [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 02:30, 4 December 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 7 November 2021
Line 460:		Line 460:
	::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)		::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)
	:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)		:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)
			::::::I know I'm over a year late, and that no one probably cares about this discussion anymore, but I got a shot of the receiver's right side. [[User:TheExplodingBarrel\|TheExplodingBarrel]] ([[User talk:TheExplodingBarrel\|talk]]) 23:30, 6 November 2021 (EDT)
			::::::[[File:Fc3mp133-1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 23 May 2020
Line 459:		Line 459:
	::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)		::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)
	::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)		::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)
			:::::The primary reason, I'd imagine, is that there aren't really any good, clear shots of the in-game M133 from the right side to show that the ejection port is in the style of a Remington rather than a Baikal - the only shot we've got is from behind as Jason is cycling it, the perspective of which isn't totally clear, and trying to find shots of that side of the in-game weapon on Google (at least ones that aren't from porting the model to other games, which I can't trust to have not been modified in the transition by someone who thinks he knows more about guns than he does) is like trying to find gold by pulling teeth. I definitely see the magazine tube looking more like a Remington than a Baikal, though, which brings me to the other reason I think nobody's doing anything about it: you're being too pushy and demanding over a relatively minor change. [[User:Kadorhal\|Kadorhal]] ([[User talk:Kadorhal\|talk]]) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 27 April 2020
Line 458:		Line 458:
	:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)		:::Yeah I'm kind of inclined to agree with PaperCake, this is kind of grasping at straws.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 21:01, 29 April 2019 (EDT)
	::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)		::::The ejection port is round, the magazine cut-off is missing. This is definitely Remington. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 14:47, 26 April 2020 (EDT)
			::::In any case, I do not understand what prevents you from accepting what is. "Rename the section" - good humor, given that these pages has Pentagon-level access status. --[[User:Slon95\|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95\|talk]]) 18:27, 27 April 2020 (EDT)