Talk:Far Cry 2 - Revision history

Wuzh: /* Article unlock? */

2022-01-31T09:15:32Z

Article unlock?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 31 January 2022
Line 348:		Line 348:

	Can this article be unlocked so we can edit it? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:34, 30 January 2022 (EST)		Can this article be unlocked so we can edit it? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:34, 30 January 2022 (EST)
			:You should make your request on the admins' talk pages for a better chance to have your request heard. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:15, 31 January 2022 (EST)

Nanomat: /* Article unlock? */ new section

2022-01-31T01:34:57Z

Article unlock?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 31 January 2022
Line 344:		Line 344:
	:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)		:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST) EDIT: Or not, since apparently I forgot that it's still edit-locked.		::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST) EDIT: Or not, since apparently I forgot that it's still edit-locked.

			== Article unlock? ==

			Can this article be unlocked so we can edit it? --[[User:Nanomat\|Nanomat]] ([[User talk:Nanomat\|talk]]) 20:34, 30 January 2022 (EST)

Pyr0m4n14c: /* The Alleged Springfield */

2022-01-17T00:56:29Z

The Alleged Springfield

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 17 January 2022
Line 343:		Line 343:
	I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)		I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)		:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST)		::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST) EDIT: Or not, since apparently I forgot that it's still edit-locked.

Pyr0m4n14c: /* The Alleged Springfield */

2022-01-17T00:54:29Z

The Alleged Springfield

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 17 January 2022
Line 340:		Line 340:
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

	== The Alleged Springfield ==		==The Alleged Springfield==

	I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)		I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)		:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)
			::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST)

AgentGumby: /* The Alleged Springfield */

2022-01-16T15:44:46Z

The Alleged Springfield

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 16 January 2022
Line 343:		Line 343:

	I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)		I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)
			:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)

Pyr0m4n14c: /* The Alleged Springfield */ new section

2022-01-16T15:35:57Z

The Alleged Springfield: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 16 January 2022
Line 339:		Line 339:
	:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response before myself - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response before myself - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

			== The Alleged Springfield ==

			I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* "AR-16" */

2020-06-11T18:20:48Z

"AR-16"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response ~~when I made my stink prior~~ - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response before myself - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

StanTheMan: /* "AR-16" */

2020-06-11T18:20:13Z

"AR-16"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
			:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response when I made my stink prior - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

AgentGumby: /* "AR-16" */

2020-06-11T13:40:28Z

"AR-16"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
			:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

Wuzh: /* "AR-16" */

2020-06-11T08:03:53Z

"AR-16"

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 11 June 2020
Line 336:		Line 336:
	:: You should try making an appeal to the admins directly on their talk pages. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 06:32, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		:: You should try making an appeal to the admins directly on their talk pages. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 06:32, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
			:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 17 January 2022
Line 343:		Line 343:
	I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)		I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)		:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST)		::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST) EDIT: Or not, since apparently I forgot that it's still edit-locked.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 17 January 2022
Line 340:		Line 340:
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

	== The Alleged Springfield ==		==The Alleged Springfield==

	I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)		I can't believe that nobody's pointed this out yet, but is that even a Springfield? The receiver's completely wrong - if anything, the bolt and safety look like a (left-handed, of course) Remington 700. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:35, 16 January 2022 (EST)
	:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)		:It's an older game, so along with the alleged Ithaca I can see why this has never been brought up. I can see it too, although the thing still has the full stock and barrel band of a 1903 so it's a bit more of a hybrid. I think just back when this page was first written, the in-game names were really the only thing used for ID-ing the guns.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 10:44, 16 January 2022 (EST)
			::Yeah, stuff has really changed a lot since then. And the fact that this page was edit-locked for a while probably means that it didn't get swept along with the changes like most of the higher-profile pages out there. Anyway, I'll change it now. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 19:54, 16 January 2022 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response ~~when I made my stink prior~~ - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response before myself - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
			:::::: The media page's talk page is the proper place to discuss edits on/for said page - I wouldn't start going on any admin's talk page directly unless there's been a long time lack of response. Bear in mind we're all volunteers here and things sometimes take a minute to be attended to. That said, I got plenty of response when I made my stink prior - I'm sure this next round will be addressed in due course. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:20, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 11 June 2020
Line 337:		Line 337:
	::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)		::: I already made a very impassioned appeal about changing the layout some time back and got shot down (actually it's the ridiculous pile of text right above this section). Simply put the man who owns and pays for the site likes it this way and that's pretty much it - Every place has it's bit of arbitrariness and this page is one of those bits I guess. As for that gun ID, that's another story. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 14:23, 6 June 2020 (EDT)
	:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)		:::: I mean, the appeals should be made directly on the admin's user talk pages (not on this page), so we can communicate the point more directly. --[[User:Wuzh\|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh\|talk]]) 04:03, 11 June 2020 (EDT)
			:::::I believe the layout is alright as is, but I also agree that the AR-16 and Homeland 37 that I've also talked about a few years ago could have some up-to-date/newer standards ID.--[[User:AgentGumby\|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby\|talk]]) 09:40, 11 June 2020 (EDT)