Talk:FN P90 - Revision history

Pustelga7: /* Other Variants */

2023-06-23T18:34:15Z

Other Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 23 June 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[[File:FN P90 with suppressor.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 with suppressor - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:FN P90 with suppressor.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 with suppressor - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]		[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper ~~reciever~~ with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper receiver with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]

	===Airsoft Variants===		===Airsoft Variants===

Ominae: /* Other Variants */

2022-06-17T07:02:50Z

Other Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 17 June 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Other Variants==		==Other Variants==
	[[File:FN P90 with suppressor.jpg\|thumb\|none\|~~400px~~\|FN P90 with suppressor - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:FN P90 with suppressor.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 with suppressor - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]		[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]

Ominae: /* Other Variants */

2022-06-17T07:02:25Z

Other Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:02, 17 June 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Other Variants==		==Other Variants==
			[[File:FN P90 with suppressor.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|FN P90 with suppressor - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]		[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]

TheExplodingBarrel: /* Screen-Used Variants */

2021-12-14T04:45:21Z

Screen-Used Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 14 December 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:

	===Screen-Used Variants===		===Screen-Used Variants===
	[[File:HGFNP90.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 ~~seen~~ in ~~film~~]]		[[File:HGFNP90.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 used in ''[[The Hunger Games: Catching Fire]]'']]

	=Discussion=		=Discussion=

Ominae at 03:21, 14 December 2021

2021-12-14T03:21:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 14 December 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	[[File:P90 Ver LLENN.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Tokyo Marui P-90 Ver.LLENN]]		[[File:P90 Ver LLENN.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Tokyo Marui P-90 Ver.LLENN]]

	===Screen-Used Variants==		===Screen-Used Variants===
	[[File:HGFNP90.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 seen in film]]		[[File:HGFNP90.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 seen in film]]

Ominae at 03:21, 14 December 2021

2021-12-14T03:21:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 14 December 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Other Variants==		==Other Variants==

	[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]		[[Image:Fn p90 3.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN P90 Tactical LV with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, Surefire Universal weaponlight, and suppressor. The LV model is fitted with an integral laser as noted by the plate on the front of the grip, and the laser warning sticker - 5.7x28mm]]
	[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:Effen90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|FN PS90, customized with a short SBR barrel and an aftermarket EFFEN 90 upper reciever with a distinct flat top Picatinny rail - 5.7x28mm]]

	===Airsoft Variants===		===Airsoft Variants===
	[[File:P90pred.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|'''Airsoft''' FN P90 "Predator" - (fake) 5.7x28mm. Note the STANAG magazine adaptor, something only possible on an Airsoft gun.]]		[[File:P90pred.jpg\|thumb\|none\|450px\|'''Airsoft''' FN P90 "Predator" - (fake) 5.7x28mm. Note the STANAG magazine adaptor, something only possible on an Airsoft gun.]]
	[[File:P90 Ver LLENN.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Tokyo Marui P-90 Ver.LLENN]]		[[File:P90 Ver LLENN.jpg\|thumb\|none\|400px\|Tokyo Marui P-90 Ver.LLENN]]

			===Screen-Used Variants==
			[[File:HGFNP90.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 seen in film]]

	=Discussion=		=Discussion=

AgentHotel: /* Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants */

2021-11-12T05:23:04Z

Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, 12 November 2021
Line 67:		Line 67:
	::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)		::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)
	:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be weird to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is definite what it is. I would be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)		:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be weird to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is definite what it is. I would be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)
	::::I guess that I'd input them as '''P90 Tactical / USG''' as in one entry while adding brief description of both of them as per your suggestions. Regarding "Redundancy" on iron sights of it, I think that's because the tunnel sight which can be found [https://imgur.com/gallery/7idvt/ here] would be obstructive in-game due to not having simulated blur when ADS just like IRL & the community already loathe particularly "Obstructive" iron sights such as AR-15 carry handle. Still, I appreciate ~~you for taking~~ your inputs regarding both variants in order to clear out some confusion ~~regarding~~ both Tactical & USG. [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 22:12, 11 November 2021 (EST)		::::I guess that I'd input them as '''P90 Tactical / USG''' as in one entry while adding brief description of both of them as per your suggestions. Regarding "Redundancy" on iron sights of it, I think that's because the tunnel sight which can be found [https://imgur.com/gallery/7idvt/ here] would be obstructive in-game due to not having simulated blur when ADS just like IRL & the community already loathe particularly "Obstructive" iron sights such as AR-15 carry handle. Still, I appreciate your inputs regarding both variants in order to clear out some confusion on both Tactical & USG. [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 22:12, 11 November 2021 (EST)

	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===

AgentHotel: /* Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants */

2021-11-12T03:12:38Z

Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 12 November 2021
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)		:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)
	::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)		::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)
	:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be ~~wierd~~ to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is ~~deffinite~~ what it is. I ~~woul~~ be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)		:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be weird to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is definite what it is. I would be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)
			::::I guess that I'd input them as '''P90 Tactical / USG''' as in one entry while adding brief description of both of them as per your suggestions. Regarding "Redundancy" on iron sights of it, I think that's because the tunnel sight which can be found [https://imgur.com/gallery/7idvt/ here] would be obstructive in-game due to not having simulated blur when ADS just like IRL & the community already loathe particularly "Obstructive" iron sights such as AR-15 carry handle. Still, I appreciate you for taking your inputs regarding both variants in order to clear out some confusion regarding both Tactical & USG. [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 22:12, 11 November 2021 (EST)

	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===

Commando552: /* Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants */

2021-11-11T21:50:11Z

Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 11 November 2021
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)		:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)
	::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)		::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)
			:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be wierd to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is deffinite what it is. I woul be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)

	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===

AgentHotel: /* Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants */ Added official artwork & renders of P90 Tactical in Sandstorm.

2021-11-11T02:14:35Z

Possible New Entries for Tactical & USG Variants: Added official artwork & renders of P90 Tactical in Sandstorm.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 11 November 2021
Line 69:		Line 69:
	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===
	[[File:P90 tact d 500px.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 Tactical - FN 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:P90 tact d 500px.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 Tactical - FN 5.7x28mm]]
			[[File:Sandstorm Operation Warlord Promo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
			[[File:Sandstorm P90 Promo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
			[[File:Sandstorm P90 Promo 1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Sandstorm P90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Sandstorm P90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Sandstorm P90 Sights.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Sandstorm P90 Sights.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 12 November 2021
Line 66:		Line 66:
	:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)		:Wait a minute, that's what that was about? I must've misunderstood, then - I thought you were asking if they should be separate entries on the ''game's'' page. I mean, I guess they could be separate entries here too, but I'd probably wait for some other peoples' input before going ahead with it. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c\|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c\|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2021 (EDT)
	::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)		::Well, TBH I'm asking if both of them should be classified as separate variants on P90 page first before being separated on Sandstorm page (Also to make sure that I can create new entries in the future if NWI somehow adds relatively "Obscure" firearms along with variants of existing ones which haven't been seen in popular medias yet until they're added by NWI). Regarding your last statement, I think that's it's a good idea for waiting for others' inputs first regarding Tactical & USG variants due Sandstorm seems to be the first popular media to depict both variants (At least for video games). [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 01:47, 18 September 2021 (EDT)
	:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be ~~wierd~~ to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is ~~deffinite~~ what it is. I ~~woul~~ be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)		:::I would not personally think that they should get separate entries, as they are the same actual gun. The "USG" is just a P90 with a specific sight. There are I think 5 or 6 different sight options for the P90 using the standard upper, and it would be weird to separate them based solely on this. To me the USG being a separate "model" is just a bit or marketing spin by FN USA. As for the tactical, it has the same issue that is is just a regular P90 with a different "sight", except in this instance the sight is a rail. It uses a standard upper, so to switch back and forth between the two you just take of the rail and fit one of the various Ring Sights optics. The reason the TR has a different section is that it actually has a different receiver so cannot be switched back and forth to a different model so it is definite what it is. I would be more on board with making a section of the tactical as it is pretty clear when you are looking at one and right now it ends up getting conflated with the TR because people don't necessarily understand the difference, but it seems a bit arbitrary to make a different category for a P90 that is fitted with a different red dot sight to another P90 with a red dot sight. Also, I've just got to say the the Tactical as set up in the game below may set a record for most redundant iron sights as it would have FOUR different sets. The standard P90 upper has a set of emergency open irons on each side, the tactical rail has its own aperture sight in the tunnel part, and then this gun has detachable irons on the rail. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 16:50, 11 November 2021 (EST)
			::::I guess that I'd input them as '''P90 Tactical / USG''' as in one entry while adding brief description of both of them as per your suggestions. Regarding "Redundancy" on iron sights of it, I think that's because the tunnel sight which can be found [https://imgur.com/gallery/7idvt/ here] would be obstructive in-game due to not having simulated blur when ADS just like IRL & the community already loathe particularly "Obstructive" iron sights such as AR-15 carry handle. Still, I appreciate you for taking your inputs regarding both variants in order to clear out some confusion regarding both Tactical & USG. [[User:AgentHotel\|AgentHotel]] ([[User talk:AgentHotel\|talk]]) 22:12, 11 November 2021 (EST)

	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 11 November 2021
Line 69:		Line 69:
	===P90 Tactical===		===P90 Tactical===
	[[File:P90 tact d 500px.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 Tactical - FN 5.7x28mm]]		[[File:P90 tact d 500px.jpg\|thumb\|400px\|none\|FN P90 Tactical - FN 5.7x28mm]]
			[[File:Sandstorm Operation Warlord Promo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
			[[File:Sandstorm P90 Promo.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
			[[File:Sandstorm P90 Promo 1.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Sandstorm P90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Sandstorm P90.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]
	[[File:Sandstorm P90 Sights.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]		[[File:Sandstorm P90 Sights.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px]]