Talk:Die Hard 2 - Revision history

StanTheMan at 03:58, 12 December 2015

2015-12-12T03:58:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:58, 12 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			__TOC__

			=Discussion=

	Thanks for the ID on the [[Remington 870]], I figured has to be either that or a Mossberg, but didn't guess it in fear of getting it wrong. Anyway, I decided to do more screencaps to get the rest of the weapons onto the page, and also for the M16A1. I figured since everyone knows there are M16A1s with A2 Handguards in the movie, I might as well get a screencap of it.--[[User:Alienqueen11\|Alienqueen11]] 21:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)		Thanks for the ID on the [[Remington 870]], I figured has to be either that or a Mossberg, but didn't guess it in fear of getting it wrong. Anyway, I decided to do more screencaps to get the rest of the weapons onto the page, and also for the M16A1. I figured since everyone knows there are M16A1s with A2 Handguards in the movie, I might as well get a screencap of it.--[[User:Alienqueen11\|Alienqueen11]] 21:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Line 4:		Line 8:

	I included more shots of the MP5s, how does it loook now?--[[User:Alienqueen11\|Alienqueen11]] 21:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)		I included more shots of the MP5s, how does it loook now?--[[User:Alienqueen11\|Alienqueen11]] 21:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)




	== The "Glock invisible"-nonsense ==		== The "Glock invisible"-nonsense ==

Evil Tim: /* Unused images */

2014-12-25T05:25:06Z

Unused images

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 25 December 2014
Line 154:		Line 154:
	::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)		::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			::::Honestly, next you'll be saying there are more than two ''Terminator'' movies or something. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 00:25, 25 December 2014 (EST)

Cool-breeze: /* Unused images */

2014-12-24T23:47:46Z

Unused images

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 24 December 2014
Line 153:		Line 153:
	:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)		::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)

Evil Tim: /* Unused images */

2014-12-24T21:28:06Z

Unused images

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 24 December 2014
Line 152:		Line 152:
	Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)		Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)

Cool-breeze: /* Unused images */

2014-12-24T20:33:45Z

Unused images

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 24 December 2014
Line 151:		Line 151:

	Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)		Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)

MT2008: /* About Beretta 92FS wielded by Miller */

2014-12-24T19:48:13Z

About Beretta 92FS wielded by Miller

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 24 December 2014
Line 64:		Line 64:

	The page states that it could be a countinuity error, when it is not. I've watched the flick recently, and noticed that during hand-to-hand fight Miller commandeered McClane's own Beretta, being unable to get a hold of his Glock which was kicked out from his hands earlier. After McClane continued the chase and managed to knock him down for a moment, he seemingly dropped John's Beretta in the luggage trolley. --[[SilverFox]]		The page states that it could be a countinuity error, when it is not. I've watched the flick recently, and noticed that during hand-to-hand fight Miller commandeered McClane's own Beretta, being unable to get a hold of his Glock which was kicked out from his hands earlier. After McClane continued the chase and managed to knock him down for a moment, he seemingly dropped John's Beretta in the luggage trolley. --[[SilverFox]]

			:I think you are correct. Before McClane sprays him in the face, you can (barely) see that Miller retrieves the Beretta from the conveyor belt and tries to shoot him with it. I am guessing that they filmed a shot of Miller grabbing the Beretta, but it was removed during editing. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:48, 24 December 2014 (EST)

	== Blank Rounds ==		== Blank Rounds ==

MT2008 at 19:15, 24 December 2014

2014-12-24T19:15:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 24 December 2014
Line 139:		Line 139:
	:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)		:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)
	::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)		::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)

			==Unused images==

			I hope nobody minds, but I would like to add some additional images to the page, and some of the older ones will need to go in order to ensure that the page length is acceptable. I'm pasting them here.

			[[File:DH2 McClane.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|LAPD Detective Lt. John McClane ([[Bruce Willis]]) draws his Beretta 92FS.]]
			[[Image:DH2 MP5K-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Burke ([[John Leguizamo]]) with an Heckler & Koch MP5K.]]
			[[Image:DH2_M16.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|An airport SWAT officer carries an M16A1 during the Annex Skywalk shootout.]]

			Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)

Funkychinaman at 04:39, 5 March 2014

2014-03-05T04:39:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 5 March 2014
Line 138:		Line 138:
	: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)		: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)
	:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)		:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)
			::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)

Funkychinaman at 04:26, 5 March 2014

2014-03-05T04:26:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 5 March 2014
Line 137:		Line 137:

	: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)		: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)
			:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)

StanTheMan: /* Beretta 92F or FS */

2014-03-05T02:09:22Z

Beretta 92F or FS

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 5 March 2014
Line 136:		Line 136:
	I thought the cut-off for the 92FS was sometime in the early nineties. Wouldn't it be more likely that these are all Beretta 92Fs? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 16:16, 4 March 2014 (EST)		I thought the cut-off for the 92FS was sometime in the early nineties. Wouldn't it be more likely that these are all Beretta 92Fs? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 16:16, 4 March 2014 (EST)

	: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be ~~92Fs~~'s as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)		: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 25 December 2014
Line 154:		Line 154:
	::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)		::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			::::Honestly, next you'll be saying there are more than two ''Terminator'' movies or something. [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 00:25, 25 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 24 December 2014
Line 153:		Line 153:
	:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)		::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			:::Yes I am sorry, much mistake in my previous statement. I was getting confused in my old age of 27. I was thinking of the Generic Bruce Willis Action Movie. No relation to Die Hard whatsoever. Many apologies ;)--[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 24 December 2014
Line 152:		Line 152:
	Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)		Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)
	:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)		:Absolutely nothing wrong with that. As long as you don't include those so called Die Hard films of the 21st century. And the first Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. --[[User:Cool-breeze\|cool-breeze]] ([[User talk:Cool-breeze\|talk]]) 15:33, 24 December 2014 (EST)
			::What films? You speak of nothing! What kind of foolish trick are you trying to play? [[User:Evil Tim\|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim\|talk]]) 16:28, 24 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 24 December 2014
Line 139:		Line 139:
	:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)		:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)
	::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)		::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)

			==Unused images==

			I hope nobody minds, but I would like to add some additional images to the page, and some of the older ones will need to go in order to ensure that the page length is acceptable. I'm pasting them here.

			[[File:DH2 McClane.jpg\|thumb\|none\|601px\|LAPD Detective Lt. John McClane ([[Bruce Willis]]) draws his Beretta 92FS.]]
			[[Image:DH2 MP5K-2.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|Burke ([[John Leguizamo]]) with an Heckler & Koch MP5K.]]
			[[Image:DH2_M16.jpg\|thumb\|none\|600px\|An airport SWAT officer carries an M16A1 during the Annex Skywalk shootout.]]

			Merry Christmas! (Yes, I spend my vacation watching ''[[Die Hard]]'' movies.) -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 14:15, 24 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 5 March 2014
Line 138:		Line 138:
	: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)		: I think the 92FS was released in the late 80s actually. The 92FS Inox was available in 1990 (No earlier pistols were available as Inoxes), so the 92FS had to be around already. A 92FS was the weapon used in all the ''Lethal Weapon'' films from ''[[Lethal Weapon 2]]'' on, and it was released the year before ''Die Hard 2''. <br><BR> EDIT - There is also an image of Willis' screen-used 92FS on the page taken by MPM, so unless he's lying, I'd have to say the 92FS was definitely already around. I realize you're talking about the secondary guns and if they're all 92FS's as well, but seeing as how the film shelled out for real MP5s (including Stuart's A5) and MP5Ks, I don't think it's a reach to say the other Berettas could be newer 92FS's as well. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (EST)
	:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)		:He uploaded the 92F from DH1, but the file name says 92FS, while the one on the page is labeled DH1. The 92F is labeled as such in the accompanying caption though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:26, 4 March 2014 (EST)
			::There appears to be a discussion about it on the Beretta 92 talk page. MPM did lay out the dates though. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 23:39, 4 March 2014 (EST)