Talk:Counter-Strike Online - Revision history

Godzillafan93 at 06:11, 21 June 2014

2014-06-21T06:11:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:11, 21 June 2014
Line 175:		Line 175:
	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)


			== Abysmal Gun Handling ==

			I mean, even by the standards usually set by Valve, this game is populated by people who have about as much business holding firearms as George Romero film characters. Between teacupping, lack of trigger discipline, and several portraits showing characters pulling the triggers on the weapons they're holding, this is horrific.

Pandolfini at 10:53, 12 June 2013

2013-06-12T10:53:55Z

@@ Line 159: / Line 159: @@
 Now that there´s a english cso, I had the oportunity to play. Must say, really different gameplay. But there`s something else. The deagle skin is different than the one posted here. When I can I´ll upload a pic here to show you :)--[[User:Thebarry1394|TheBarry1394]] 00:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 :Finaly some good news. I would have downloaded CSO.sg month ago, but my PC broke, so Im left with a laptop.
 == Fictional Guns ==

ReikoKotobuki at 16:44, 2 August 2011

2011-08-02T16:44:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 2 August 2011
Line 164:		Line 164:
	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

	~~== Lightning SG-1 and Flintlock Pistol ==~~

	~~Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]]~~

ReikoKotobuki at 14:25, 31 July 2011

2011-07-31T14:25:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 31 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:

	=='''PLEASE PROVE A WEAPON'S EXISTENCE IN ANY CSO VERSION BEFORE ADDING AN ENTRY'''==		=='''PLEASE PROVE A WEAPON'S EXISTENCE IN ANY CSO VERSION BEFORE ADDING AN ENTRY'''==
	A "Maybe Have" section has no place whatsoever in any article. Unless you have definite proof that a weapon is in a work, please DO NOT add an entry. Valid proof includes images and video. Only use text as a placeholder and NEVER as a permanent entry.--[[User:HashiriyaR32\|HashiriyaR32]] 03:21, 23 May 2011 (CDT)		A "Maybe Have" section has no place whatsoever in any article. Unless you have definite proof that a weapon is in a work, please DO NOT add an entry. Valid proof includes images and video. Only use text as a placeholder and NEVER as a permanent entry.--[[User:HashiriyaR32\|HashiriyaR32]] 03:21, 23 May 2011 (CDT)
Line 165:		Line 164:
	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

			== Lightning SG-1 and Flintlock Pistol ==

	Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]]		Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]]

ReikoKotobuki: /* Fictional Guns */

2011-07-31T14:16:09Z

Fictional Guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 31 July 2011
Line 166:		Line 166:
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

	Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]		Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]]

ReikoKotobuki: /* Fictional Guns */

2011-07-31T14:14:07Z

Fictional Guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 31 July 2011
Line 165:		Line 165:
	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

			Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]

HashiriyaR32 at 08:21, 23 May 2011

2011-05-23T08:21:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 23 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:

			=='''PLEASE PROVE A WEAPON'S EXISTENCE IN ANY CSO VERSION BEFORE ADDING AN ENTRY'''==
			A "Maybe Have" section has no place whatsoever in any article. Unless you have definite proof that a weapon is in a work, please DO NOT add an entry. Valid proof includes images and video. Only use text as a placeholder and NEVER as a permanent entry.--[[User:HashiriyaR32\|HashiriyaR32]] 03:21, 23 May 2011 (CDT)
			------------------------------------------------
	i dont think that the xm8, SCARs or the qbz95 are in counter strike, for any platform.		i dont think that the xm8, SCARs or the qbz95 are in counter strike, for any platform.

Line 23:		Line 27:

	since the CSO models are encrypted (something like that, the file extention isn`t .mdl like in cs 1.6) so, you will have to do something so the game can take the skins. Its easier to play cso nst, cscz based version of the CSO. CSO NST uses .mdl files. But you have to be carefull with the animation sequences (replacing the exact gun), unless you have some experience making models/skins or converting (like converting the deagle so you can use it as a p228) If you have any question about how is CSO NST playing, search it in youtube, you´ll find the original prewiews of the mod developer.[[User:Thebarry1394\|TheBarry1394]]		since the CSO models are encrypted (something like that, the file extention isn`t .mdl like in cs 1.6) so, you will have to do something so the game can take the skins. Its easier to play cso nst, cscz based version of the CSO. CSO NST uses .mdl files. But you have to be carefull with the animation sequences (replacing the exact gun), unless you have some experience making models/skins or converting (like converting the deagle so you can use it as a p228) If you have any question about how is CSO NST playing, search it in youtube, you´ll find the original prewiews of the mod developer.[[User:Thebarry1394\|TheBarry1394]]

	~~=='''PLEASE PROVE A WEAPON'S EXISTENCE IN ANY CSO VERSION BEFORE ADDING AN ENTRY'''==~~
	A "Maybe Have" section has no place whatsoever in any article. Unless you have definite proof that a weapon is in a work, please DO NOT add an entry. Valid proof includes images and video. Only use text as a placeholder and NEVER as a permanent entry.--[[User:HashiriyaR32\|HashiriyaR32]] 03:21, 23 May 2011 (CDT)

HashiriyaR32 at 08:21, 23 May 2011

2011-05-23T08:21:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 23 May 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:

	since the CSO models are encrypted (something like that, the file extention isn`t .mdl like in cs 1.6) so, you will have to do something so the game can take the skins. Its easier to play cso nst, cscz based version of the CSO. CSO NST uses .mdl files. But you have to be carefull with the animation sequences (replacing the exact gun), unless you have some experience making models/skins or converting (like converting the deagle so you can use it as a p228) If you have any question about how is CSO NST playing, search it in youtube, you´ll find the original prewiews of the mod developer.[[User:Thebarry1394\|TheBarry1394]]		since the CSO models are encrypted (something like that, the file extention isn`t .mdl like in cs 1.6) so, you will have to do something so the game can take the skins. Its easier to play cso nst, cscz based version of the CSO. CSO NST uses .mdl files. But you have to be carefull with the animation sequences (replacing the exact gun), unless you have some experience making models/skins or converting (like converting the deagle so you can use it as a p228) If you have any question about how is CSO NST playing, search it in youtube, you´ll find the original prewiews of the mod developer.[[User:Thebarry1394\|TheBarry1394]]

			=='''PLEASE PROVE A WEAPON'S EXISTENCE IN ANY CSO VERSION BEFORE ADDING AN ENTRY'''==
			A "Maybe Have" section has no place whatsoever in any article. Unless you have definite proof that a weapon is in a work, please DO NOT add an entry. Valid proof includes images and video. Only use text as a placeholder and NEVER as a permanent entry.--[[User:HashiriyaR32\|HashiriyaR32]] 03:21, 23 May 2011 (CDT)


	==Protection of this page==		==Protection of this page==

Mr. Wolf: /* Fictional Guns */

2011-05-22T18:11:01Z

Fictional Guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 22 May 2011
Line 159:		Line 159:

	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just ~~plane~~ silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

Mr. Wolf: /* Fictional Guns */

2011-05-22T18:10:08Z

Fictional Guns

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 22 May 2011
Line 159:		Line 159:

	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
			:Wow, this version of CS is just plane silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 31 July 2011
Line 165:		Line 165:
	Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		Why is the SVD+M203 fictional? I would say it is not very common, but a skillful terrorist could create that abomination. And the other 3 fictional "guns", I really think those should go. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 02:45, 22 May 2011 (CDT)
	:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)		:Wow, this version of CS is just plain silly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf\|Mr. Wolf]] 13:10, 22 May 2011 (CDT)

			Where is the Flintlock pistol and Lightning SG-1 came from? - [[User:ReikoKotobuki\|ReikoKotobuki]