Talk:Colt SCAMP - Revision history

Ultimate94ninja at 19:57, 24 August 2017

2017-08-24T19:57:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 24 August 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			Btw I find it weird that Modern Firearms categorizes it as an SMG. Isn't it closer to a pistol? (especially that it was intended to replace the M1911, etc.) --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 15:57, 24 August 2017 (EDT)

	=Page=		=Page=
	The Colt SCAMP (Small Caliber Automatic Machine Pistol) was a recoil-operated, locking breech, selective fire machine pistol. It was made to replace the [[M1911A1]]. It featured a compensator, a 27-round magazine, and also a capability of three round burst. It was chambered in .22 SCAMP (5.56x29mm) cartridge that was meant to avoid the high recoil. But the army wasn't interested to replace the M1911A1 in 1971 (when the SCAMP entered in production) so due to the lack of sales, the production was ended after two decades.		The Colt SCAMP (Small Caliber Automatic Machine Pistol) was a recoil-operated, locking breech, selective fire machine pistol. It was made to replace the [[M1911A1]]. It featured a compensator, a 27-round magazine, and also a capability of three round burst. It was chambered in .22 SCAMP (5.56x29mm) cartridge that was meant to avoid the high recoil. But the army wasn't interested to replace the M1911A1 in 1971 (when the SCAMP entered in production) so due to the lack of sales, the production was ended after two decades.

	[[Image:Coltscamp.jpg\|thumb\|right\|350px\|Colt SCAMP .22 SCAMP]]		[[Image:Coltscamp.jpg\|thumb\|right\|350px\|Colt SCAMP - .22 SCAMP]]

	{{Gun Title}}		{{Gun Title}}

Ultimate94ninja at 16:45, 9 September 2015

2015-09-09T16:45:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 9 September 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:

	*'''Fire modes''': Semi Automatic/Three Round Burst		*'''Fire modes''': Semi Automatic/Three Round Burst

			[[Category:Storage]]

Funkychinaman: just in case it ever does appear

2015-09-09T15:34:13Z

just in case it ever does appear

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 9 September 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

			=Page=
			The Colt SCAMP (Small Caliber Automatic Machine Pistol) was a recoil-operated, locking breech, selective fire machine pistol. It was made to replace the [[M1911A1]]. It featured a compensator, a 27-round magazine, and also a capability of three round burst. It was chambered in .22 SCAMP (5.56x29mm) cartridge that was meant to avoid the high recoil. But the army wasn't interested to replace the M1911A1 in 1971 (when the SCAMP entered in production) so due to the lack of sales, the production was ended after two decades.

			[[Image:Coltscamp.jpg\|thumb\|right\|350px\|Colt SCAMP .22 SCAMP]]

			{{Gun Title}}

			==Specifications==
			(1971-?)

			*'''Type''': Machine pistol

			*'''Caliber''': .22 SCAMP

			*'''Weight''': 2.25 pounds (1.02kg) unloaded, 3.24 pounds (1.47 kg) loaded

			*'''Length''': 11.41 inches (29 cm)

			*'''Barrel length''': 9.12 inches (23.2 cm)

			*'''Capacity''': 27

			*'''Fire modes''': Semi Automatic/Three Round Burst

Funkychinaman at 18:57, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T18:57:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 7 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Mandolin at 18:46, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T18:46:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 7 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Commando552 at 17:35, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T17:35:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 7 September 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Funkychinaman at 15:32, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T15:32:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 7 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Greg-Z at 15:02, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T15:02:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 7 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Mandolin at 14:37, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T14:37:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 7 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Mandolin at 14:37, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T14:37:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 7 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 7 September 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 7 September 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 7 September 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552\|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 7 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 7 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
	:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)		:Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin\|talk]]) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
			::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z\|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)