Talk:AA-12 - Revision history

Ultimate94ninja: /* Only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood! */

2018-09-18T12:41:33Z

Only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood!

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 18 September 2018
Line 51:		Line 51:

	I'm making my way through Larry Vickers' YouTube videos of his visit to Independent Studio Services (ISS). See the third part [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFmiV08o3YY&feature=youtu.be here]; he gets his hands on the AA-12 at the 9:40 mark. You will note that the ISS handler remarks that there are only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood, and that ISS owns both of them. So, every film/TV show appearance on IMFDB's page for this gun showcases the same two firearms that ISS owns. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 20:39, 17 September 2018 (EDT)		I'm making my way through Larry Vickers' YouTube videos of his visit to Independent Studio Services (ISS). See the third part [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFmiV08o3YY&feature=youtu.be here]; he gets his hands on the AA-12 at the 9:40 mark. You will note that the ISS handler remarks that there are only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood, and that ISS owns both of them. So, every film/TV show appearance on IMFDB's page for this gun showcases the same two firearms that ISS owns. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 20:39, 17 September 2018 (EDT)
	:Yeah, that rarity was mentioned in The Expendables 3 page. Basically in movies/TV we'd either see one of ISS's AA-12s, or a mockup (like in The Expendables 3, where it was constructed around a Saiga 12). --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 08:40, 18 September 2018 (EDT)		:Yeah, that rarity was mentioned in The Expendables 3 page. Basically in movies/TV we'd either see one of ISS's AA-12s, or a mockup (like in The Expendables 3, where it was constructed around a Saiga). --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 08:40, 18 September 2018 (EDT)

Ultimate94ninja: /* Only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood! */

2018-09-18T12:40:21Z

Only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood!

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 18 September 2018
Line 51:		Line 51:

	I'm making my way through Larry Vickers' YouTube videos of his visit to Independent Studio Services (ISS). See the third part [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFmiV08o3YY&feature=youtu.be here]; he gets his hands on the AA-12 at the 9:40 mark. You will note that the ISS handler remarks that there are only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood, and that ISS owns both of them. So, every film/TV show appearance on IMFDB's page for this gun showcases the same two firearms that ISS owns. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 20:39, 17 September 2018 (EDT)		I'm making my way through Larry Vickers' YouTube videos of his visit to Independent Studio Services (ISS). See the third part [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFmiV08o3YY&feature=youtu.be here]; he gets his hands on the AA-12 at the 9:40 mark. You will note that the ISS handler remarks that there are only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood, and that ISS owns both of them. So, every film/TV show appearance on IMFDB's page for this gun showcases the same two firearms that ISS owns. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 20:39, 17 September 2018 (EDT)
			:Yeah, that rarity was mentioned in The Expendables 3 page. Basically in movies/TV we'd either see one of ISS's AA-12s, or a mockup (like in The Expendables 3, where it was constructed around a Saiga 12). --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 08:40, 18 September 2018 (EDT)

MT2008: /* How about little name correction with CoD games? */

2018-09-18T00:39:45Z

How about little name correction with CoD games?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 18 September 2018
Line 47:		Line 47:
	I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I remove 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)		I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I remove 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)
	:The table was f-d up. Somebody removed the notation column. Now it should be good. --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:37, 15 April 2012 (CDT)		:The table was f-d up. Somebody removed the notation column. Now it should be good. --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:37, 15 April 2012 (CDT)

			==Only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood!==

			I'm making my way through Larry Vickers' YouTube videos of his visit to Independent Studio Services (ISS). See the third part [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFmiV08o3YY&feature=youtu.be here]; he gets his hands on the AA-12 at the 9:40 mark. You will note that the ISS handler remarks that there are only two AA-12s in all of Hollywood, and that ISS owns both of them. So, every film/TV show appearance on IMFDB's page for this gun showcases the same two firearms that ISS owns. -[[User:MT2008\|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008\|talk]]) 20:39, 17 September 2018 (EDT)

AnActualAK47: /* It sure ain't pretty */

2015-11-06T01:19:46Z

It sure ain't pretty

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 6 November 2015
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:From what I've heard about it, it's a low-power laser dazzler that only blinds temporarily, a bit like an aimable flashbang. Strikes me as one of those things that sounds good in "Future Soldier" presentations but would be hideously impractical in actual use, like those daft micro-missiles from the new Ghost Recon game. [[User:Vangelis\|Vangelis]] 10:22, 6 March 2011 (MSK)		:From what I've heard about it, it's a low-power laser dazzler that only blinds temporarily, a bit like an aimable flashbang. Strikes me as one of those things that sounds good in "Future Soldier" presentations but would be hideously impractical in actual use, like those daft micro-missiles from the new Ghost Recon game. [[User:Vangelis\|Vangelis]] 10:22, 6 March 2011 (MSK)
	The idea is nice. The objective of Law Enforcement is not to shoot on sight of a criminals. It is to arrest him so that the full extent of the law can happen. It would be a nice tool to have a phaser from Star Trek and set to stun. It would reduce accidental death by gun to almost nothing unless you set yours to kill. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 10:25, 6 March 2011 (MSK)		The idea is nice. The objective of Law Enforcement is not to shoot on sight of a criminals. It is to arrest him so that the full extent of the law can happen. It would be a nice tool to have a phaser from Star Trek and set to stun. It would reduce accidental death by gun to almost nothing unless you set yours to kill. [[User:Excalibur01\|Excalibur01]] 10:25, 6 March 2011 (MSK)
			::I gotta say, this gun looks really sleek.--[[User:AnActualAK47\|AnActualAK47]] ([[User talk:AnActualAK47\|talk]]) 20:19, 5 November 2015 (EST)

	==Full Auto pretty useless==		==Full Auto pretty useless==

Blueboy1600: /* Full Auto pretty useless */

2012-08-20T03:12:57Z

Full Auto pretty useless

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 20 August 2012
Line 32:		Line 32:
	I think the point of full-auto is not solely to make it fire as fast as possible but to alleviate the need to having to press the trigger multiple times. While you're putting effort into firing something as fast as possible in auto-mode you just have to hold down the trigger once and all is taken care of. [[User:Brasco\|Brasco]] 09:09, 14 May 2011 (CDT)		I think the point of full-auto is not solely to make it fire as fast as possible but to alleviate the need to having to press the trigger multiple times. While you're putting effort into firing something as fast as possible in auto-mode you just have to hold down the trigger once and all is taken care of. [[User:Brasco\|Brasco]] 09:09, 14 May 2011 (CDT)

	Yeah and also i think its the fact that it can have higher capacity ability's like th3 20 round and 32 round drum and even with the 8 round drum you could load it in fast then standard shotgun tube reloading plus unlike other shotguns that use drums ( none in particular ) it isn't big bulky more practical those things IMO are a lot more useful then full auto is full auto great yes but while most of the hype is from those who love the idea of a full auto shotgun its certainly not just that, that makes this shotgun great		Yeah and also i think its the fact that it can have higher capacity ability's like th3 20 round and 32 round drum and even with the 8 round drum you could load it in fast then standard shotgun tube reloading plus unlike other shotguns that use drums ( none in particular ) it isn't big bulky more practical those things IMO are a lot more useful then full auto is full auto great yes but while most of the hype is from those who love the idea of a full auto shotgun its certainly not just that, that makes this shotgun great--[[User:Blueboy1600\|Blueboy1600]] 22:12, 19 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Service use? ==		== Service use? ==

Blueboy1600: /* Full Auto pretty useless */

2012-08-20T03:12:27Z

Full Auto pretty useless

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 20 August 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:

	I think the point of full-auto is not solely to make it fire as fast as possible but to alleviate the need to having to press the trigger multiple times. While you're putting effort into firing something as fast as possible in auto-mode you just have to hold down the trigger once and all is taken care of. [[User:Brasco\|Brasco]] 09:09, 14 May 2011 (CDT)		I think the point of full-auto is not solely to make it fire as fast as possible but to alleviate the need to having to press the trigger multiple times. While you're putting effort into firing something as fast as possible in auto-mode you just have to hold down the trigger once and all is taken care of. [[User:Brasco\|Brasco]] 09:09, 14 May 2011 (CDT)

			Yeah and also i think its the fact that it can have higher capacity ability's like th3 20 round and 32 round drum and even with the 8 round drum you could load it in fast then standard shotgun tube reloading plus unlike other shotguns that use drums ( none in particular ) it isn't big bulky more practical those things IMO are a lot more useful then full auto is full auto great yes but while most of the hype is from those who love the idea of a full auto shotgun its certainly not just that, that makes this shotgun great

	== Service use? ==		== Service use? ==

Bozitojugg3rn4ut: /* How about little name correction with CoD games? */

2012-04-15T15:37:52Z

How about little name correction with CoD games?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 15 April 2012
Line 43:		Line 43:

	I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I remove 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)		I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I remove 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)
			:The table was f-d up. Somebody removed the notation column. Now it should be good. --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:37, 15 April 2012 (CDT)

Alisha161fishy: /* How about little name correction with CoD games? */

2012-04-15T15:32:16Z

How about little name correction with CoD games?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 15 April 2012
Line 42:		Line 42:
	== How about little name correction with CoD games?==		== How about little name correction with CoD games?==

	I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I ~~removed~~ 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)		I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I remove 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)

Alisha161fishy: /* How about little name correction with CoD games? */

2012-04-15T15:31:56Z

How about little name correction with CoD games?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 15 April 2012
Line 42:		Line 42:
	== How about little name correction with CoD games?==		== How about little name correction with CoD games?==

	I swear AA-12 is NOT called ''AA-12 CQB'' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I removed 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|~~Alisha161fishy~~]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)		I swear AA-12 is NOT called 'AA-12 CQB' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I removed 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161Fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)

Alisha161fishy at 13:20, 15 April 2012

2012-04-15T13:20:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:20, 15 April 2012
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Where is produced this weapon? on the internet I found two versions, or "Military Police Systems," or "GWA". On the internet there is no information at all about these companies.--[[User:Mateogala\|Mateogala]] 09:34, 25 March 2012 (CDT)		Where is produced this weapon? on the internet I found two versions, or "Military Police Systems," or "GWA". On the internet there is no information at all about these companies.--[[User:Mateogala\|Mateogala]] 09:34, 25 March 2012 (CDT)

			== How about little name correction with CoD games?==

			I swear AA-12 is NOT called ''AA-12 CQB'' in the two CoD games: MW2 & MW3...? Should I removed 'CQB' bit, then? [[User:Alisha161fishy\|Alisha161fishy]] 08:20, 15 April 2012 (CDT)