Talk:(Red Scorpion) - AO-63 - Revision history

Jeddostotle7: /* THIS DOES NOT MERIT A PAGE */

2012-08-04T02:46:59Z

THIS DOES NOT MERIT A PAGE

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 4 August 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)		It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
	:Also, I think the top image that isn't a mock-up is actually the AO-38, the first prototype rifle with the balanced recoil system used in the [[AK-107]]. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 18:59, 29 April 2012 (CDT)		:Also, I think the top image that isn't a mock-up is actually the AO-38, the first prototype rifle with the balanced recoil system used in the [[AK-107]]. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 18:59, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
			::Yeah, can we get rid of that picture since it's an AO-38? [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 21:46, 3 August 2012 (CDT)

Ben41: moved Talk:AO-63 to Talk:(Red Scorpion) - AO-63: Fictional firearm

2012-04-30T00:49:15Z

moved Talk:AO-63 to Talk:(Red Scorpion) - AO-63: Fictional firearm

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:49, 30 April 2012
(No difference)

Commando552 at 23:59, 29 April 2012

2012-04-29T23:59:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 29 April 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==THIS DOES NOT MERIT A PAGE==		==THIS DOES NOT MERIT A PAGE==
	It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)		It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
			:Also, I think the top image that isn't a mock-up is actually the AO-38, the first prototype rifle with the balanced recoil system used in the [[AK-107]]. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 18:59, 29 April 2012 (CDT)

MoviePropMaster2008 at 21:46, 29 April 2012

2012-04-29T21:46:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 29 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:17, 16 February 2012 (CST)		Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:17, 16 February 2012 (CST)
	: It might fall under the category of fictional firearms.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] 19:55, 16 February 2012 (CST)		: It might fall under the category of fictional firearms.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] 19:55, 16 February 2012 (CST)

			==THIS DOES NOT MERIT A PAGE==
			It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)

Mandolin at 01:55, 17 February 2012

2012-02-17T01:55:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 17 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:17, 16 February 2012 (CST)		Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut\|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:17, 16 February 2012 (CST)
			: It might fall under the category of fictional firearms.--[[User:Mandolin\|Mandolin]] 19:55, 16 February 2012 (CST)

Bozitojugg3rn4ut: Created page with "Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --~~~~"

2012-02-16T19:17:33Z

Created page with "Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --~~~~"

New page

Technically we should not have this page, as there was no real AO-63 in Red Scorpion, was it? --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:17, 16 February 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 4 August 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)		It is a 'theoretical gun' that was poorly mocked up out of a FAL for a movie. No one even has pictures of what the REAL one looks like. IF anything this should not have a page if NO ONE knows what it even looks like. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008\|MoviePropMaster2008]] 16:46, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
	:Also, I think the top image that isn't a mock-up is actually the AO-38, the first prototype rifle with the balanced recoil system used in the [[AK-107]]. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 18:59, 29 April 2012 (CDT)		:Also, I think the top image that isn't a mock-up is actually the AO-38, the first prototype rifle with the balanced recoil system used in the [[AK-107]]. --[[User:Commando552\|commando552]] 18:59, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
			::Yeah, can we get rid of that picture since it's an AO-38? [[User:Jeddostotle7\|Jeddostotle7]] 21:46, 3 August 2012 (CDT)