IMFDB talk:Rules, Standards and Principles - Revision history

Ultimate94ninja: /* Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? */

2023-05-22T20:09:23Z

Firearms in television shows' credit sequences?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 22 May 2023
Line 267:		Line 267:
	:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
	:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 06:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 06:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
			:::I concur, it should be fine to include them. I think it would even be okay to have them in the main submachine gun section. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 20:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

DocWatson: /* Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? */ Signed.

2023-05-22T06:59:38Z

Firearms in television shows' credit sequences?: Signed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 22 May 2023
Line 266:		Line 266:
	Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
	:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
	:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else?		:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 06:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

DocWatson: /* Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? */ Replied.

2023-05-22T06:59:11Z

Firearms in television shows' credit sequences?: Replied.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 22 May 2023
Line 264:		Line 264:

	== Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? ==		== Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? ==

	Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
	:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
			:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else?

Funkychinaman at 04:00, 22 May 2023

2023-05-22T04:00:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 22 May 2023
Line 266:		Line 266:

	Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
			:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

DocWatson: /* Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? */ new section

2023-05-22T02:50:59Z

Firearms in television shows' credit sequences?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 22 May 2023
Line 262:		Line 262:

	Hello, I'd like to have permission if possible to use the R-S-P document as a foundation for the rules over at IGCD.net. Of course all credits will be given where due. [[User:Solarriors\|Solarriors]] ([[User talk:Solarriors\|talk]]) 21:33, 4 Jan 2022 (CET)		Hello, I'd like to have permission if possible to use the R-S-P document as a foundation for the rules over at IGCD.net. Of course all credits will be given where due. [[User:Solarriors\|Solarriors]] ([[User talk:Solarriors\|talk]]) 21:33, 4 Jan 2022 (CET)

			== Firearms in television shows' credit sequences? ==

			Greetings and felicitations. In its opening credits sequence, ''[[Law & Order: Organized Crime]]'' features a brief shot of a person holding an [[Uzi]] and a [[Carl Gustaf m/45]]. Would this count for inclusion? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 02:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Wuzh: Wuzh moved page Talk:Rules, Standards and Principles to IMFDB talk:Rules, Standards and Principles

2023-03-04T19:52:05Z

Wuzh moved page Talk:Rules, Standards and Principles to IMFDB talk:Rules, Standards and Principles

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:52, 4 March 2023
(No difference)

Solarriors at 20:33, 4 January 2022

2022-01-04T20:33:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 4 January 2022
Line 258:		Line 258:
	"(if many calibers than note it in the descriptions or specifications)" -> "(if many calibers then note it in the descriptions or specifications)"		"(if many calibers than note it in the descriptions or specifications)" -> "(if many calibers then note it in the descriptions or specifications)"
	: Fixed. Thanks for catching that. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 12:48, 23 December 2021 (EST)		: Fixed. Thanks for catching that. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 12:48, 23 December 2021 (EST)

			== at IGCD.net ==

			Hello, I'd like to have permission if possible to use the R-S-P document as a foundation for the rules over at IGCD.net. Of course all credits will be given where due. [[User:Solarriors\|Solarriors]] ([[User talk:Solarriors\|talk]]) 21:33, 4 Jan 2022 (CET)

Funkychinaman at 17:48, 23 December 2021

2021-12-23T17:48:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 23 December 2021
Line 257:		Line 257:
	Suggested edit:		Suggested edit:
	"(if many calibers than note it in the descriptions or specifications)" -> "(if many calibers then note it in the descriptions or specifications)"		"(if many calibers than note it in the descriptions or specifications)" -> "(if many calibers then note it in the descriptions or specifications)"
			: Fixed. Thanks for catching that. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 12:48, 23 December 2021 (EST)

Morvandium: /* "Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in */

2021-12-23T14:50:32Z

"Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 23 December 2021
Line 251:		Line 251:
	: I would say yes, because typically when they re-do those in 16:9, they simply cut part of the frame vertically, meaning you lose some of the actual shot. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 10:25, 30 June 2021 (EDT)		: I would say yes, because typically when they re-do those in 16:9, they simply cut part of the frame vertically, meaning you lose some of the actual shot. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 10:25, 30 June 2021 (EDT)

	== "Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in ==		== "Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue ==

	There's a minor typo, using than instead of then.		There's a minor typo, using than instead of then.

Morvandium: /* "Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in */ new section

2021-12-23T14:50:11Z

"Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 23 December 2021
Line 250:		Line 250:
	For clarification, is it correct that widescreen images are not preferred over 4:3 images where the original media has a 4:3 aspect ratio? --[[User:Tamarin88\|Tamarin88]] ([[User talk:Tamarin88\|talk]]) 17:20, 29 June 2021 (EDT)		For clarification, is it correct that widescreen images are not preferred over 4:3 images where the original media has a 4:3 aspect ratio? --[[User:Tamarin88\|Tamarin88]] ([[User talk:Tamarin88\|talk]]) 17:20, 29 June 2021 (EDT)
	: I would say yes, because typically when they re-do those in 16:9, they simply cut part of the frame vertically, meaning you lose some of the actual shot. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 10:25, 30 June 2021 (EDT)		: I would say yes, because typically when they re-do those in 16:9, they simply cut part of the frame vertically, meaning you lose some of the actual shot. [[User:StanTheMan\|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan\|talk]]) 10:25, 30 June 2021 (EDT)

			== "Image Rules" Minor grammar (wrong word) issue in ==

			There's a minor typo, using than instead of then.

			Suggested edit:
			"(if many calibers than note it in the descriptions or specifications)" -> "(if many calibers then note it in the descriptions or specifications)"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 22 May 2023
Line 267:		Line 267:
	:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:At the very least, I think it can be included as trivia. --[[User:Funkychinaman\|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman\|talk]]) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
	:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 06:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)		:: Thank you. ^_^ Anyone else? —[[User:DocWatson\|DocWatson]] ([[User talk:DocWatson\|talk]]) 06:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
			:::I concur, it should be fine to include them. I think it would even be okay to have them in the main submachine gun section. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja\|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja\|talk]]) 20:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)