<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lurker+McNasty</id>
	<title>Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lurker+McNasty"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lurker_McNasty"/>
	<updated>2026-05-28T17:44:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=595947</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=595947"/>
		<updated>2012-07-30T14:21:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Mk. 14??? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This M136 guy, Matkovic, is Navy EOD attached to Blackburn's Force Recon unit, which is why he isn't present in all of the missions.  Despite the fact that EOD doesn't work this closely with other units, that is the reasoning for his alternate appearance - [[User:Tangero2325|Tangero2325]] 9:55, 18 June 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, I've got a pair of ammo boxes, and THEY have designations (M19A1). - Wantabs_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - S9771773G 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Javelin dogtag looks so cool. I can't wait to get to 500 kills with it. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:16, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  *EDITED*  No, when I said &amp;quot;continuous fire&amp;quot;, I meant in MW3, you continually fire as if it automatically switched its magazines, instead of actually having to manually switch it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
EoghanG93 22-4-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The in game magazine capacity is 30. So I doubt it would be, someone would've picked up on that mistake by now. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 01:24, 27 April 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubtful, the MG36 and the QBB are mysteriously missing their &amp;quot;extended mag&amp;quot; attachments, leading to the unfortunate scene of a perpetually capped off Beta C-Mag. :S -- Long Fallen 02:02, 16 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The QBB is only supposed to have 75, so that was good, I think they just forgot to up the default capacity of the MG36 when they removed the attachements. Also, those two also got a heavy barrel option, and the AS Val got a 30 round mag option. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:15, 17 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After June patch, RPK Ext. magazine is gone. However, they introduced Ext. Magazine for M27 IAR, and MG36 is still missing extended magazine and it's limited to fire only 51 rounds.....Nice job DICE! [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]] 11:52, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::LOL! Baby steps... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:10, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donya Fortress Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this for the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LipJK6nxEw&amp;amp;feature=g-u-u&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Confirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*SPAS-12 (fired in pump action)&lt;br /&gt;
*AUGA3&lt;br /&gt;
*ACR (Called ACW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*JNG-90 &lt;br /&gt;
*L86 (Seen at 1:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Unconfirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*LSAT Machine Gun (Used by Engineer at 0:29 and seen in killfeed)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown compact AK variant (Seen at 1:11, carried by Engineer, looks different from AKS-74U)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown long barrelled Revolver (Also seen at 1:11, carried by a Support)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thats all I can spot [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:05, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M417 appears in the Killfeed. [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/File:M417.jpg Sauce.] [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:32, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm betting it's the semi-auto sniper for the recon kit [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:49, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The fact it's seen being used by a Recon kit at around 1:05 with an EoTech and a suppressor lends credence to the idea.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:54, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like a standard 74U to me, but that pistol doesn't really look like anything. I found the MP5K, it's at 0:50. As far as I can tell this just confirms the SPAS-12 is pump, the MP5K is the SMG, and the other sniper is the JNG-90, which I'd never heard of before. Also, they updated the &amp;quot;AUG&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;AUG A3&amp;quot; since the last trailer :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:45, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm pretty content with the weapons selection now that we've pretty much seen all of them.  I'm kind of hoping that the SPAS-12 is both pump-action and semi-auto, though.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From the press release: ''•Earn 10 new weapons and bring them back to the base game including: 1.AUG Assault Rifle, 2.SCAR Assault Rifle, 3.ACW-R Carbine, 4.MTAR-21 Carbine, 5.M417 Sniper Rifle, 6.JNG-90 Sniper Rifle, 7.L86LSW Machine Gun, 8.LSAT Machine Gun, 9.M5K Tactical Machine Pistol, 10.PAS-12 Shotgun'' [[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 06:18, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good, the SCAR-L is an AR and the ACR is a carbine, that's what I was hoping for, and the only thing we didn't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:29, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you ever see the charging handle of the SG 553, as I'm wondering whether it is genuinely an SG 553 or a mislabelled SG 552 (charging handle is the only deffinite difference). The gun picture is actually a mislabelled SG 552.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:20, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  You can look at the right side of weapons in-game by putting them on a bipod and rotating them. What exactly is the definitive difference between the 552 and 533, other than the RIS? --[[User:ArrowTwoActual|ArrowTwoActual]] 19:07, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter how many times I look at, or just think of, the MP7 rounds ''this'' big I have hilarity induced seizures. Thanks for the unending joy,  but I am suing you for giving me epilepsy. --[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 11:35, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...what? &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 01:13, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the screen shots for the MP7 shows the reload animation without a magazine, so the animation looks like the player is gesturing how big the bullets would be.--[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 01:26, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's pretty funny, as are a lot of the other ones. Whoever does those captions, I don't know if it's everyone or one really funny person, but thank you :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:52, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Missing Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I noticed we're still missing a in game screenshots of some of the BtK weapons. I loaded up fraps and snapped a few of the ones I have unlocked. I'm missing the QBU-88 QBZ-95B the L96 and the MK3A1, but I have a few good shots of the rest. Screwed up catching images of some of the charging animations though. Also, the charging animation on the L85 looks like it's just smacking the cheek rest. Photo album is here: [http://imgur.com/a/j38Rv] I'll let someone more senior that me decide which photos to add, it's been a while since I edited a wiki. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:29, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is correct for an L85, there is a bolt release catch underneath the cheek rest on the left side of the gun. When you empty a magazine the bolt will lock back, so you just need to change the magazine and push the catch up to chamber the first round. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:11, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for that Commando, info on the L85 seems hard to find. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:56, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the patch hsa changed the PP-19to be chambered in the 9x18mm Makarov, would it be at all possible to have the screenshot of the loadout screen to represent the change? It currently shows it pre-patch where its still in the 9x19mm Parabellum. I'd do it myself but I only have it for 360 and I don't know how. Thanks. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:58, 13 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How do we know the M1911 in this game is an M-45 MEU(SOC)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real life picture provided shows the pistol with U.S. Army markings. How do we know the in-game M1911 is actually an MEUSOC?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines.&amp;quot; That's an exact match to the 1st-gen MEUSOC pisotls. As for why it has army markings, it was probably built on a standard Army M1911A1, but I don't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:57, 16 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Close Quarters Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I bought Premium, and I've unlocked a few of the guns. Uploaded some screens, and I'm gonna start adding them into the page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the SCAR-L, AUG-A3, ACR, HK417, SPAS-12, L86A2. I can't unlock the MP5K or the JNG-90 until the maps are unlocked on PC, but I'll add the LSAT and MTAR-21 screens when I unlock them. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:05, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added missing screens of the L85A2, MG36, QBB-95, LSAT, MTAR-21. Still have the QBU-88 sniper rifle and the L96/G22 to add. Too tired to add them now. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:21, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CQ Weapons Comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was disappointed to see the ACR in the carbine kit although it's the full length version with a fixed stock. I was hoping they'd put the SCAR-L in the carbine kit instead, as the SCAR-H already is there.&lt;br /&gt;
I Also liked if the HK417 was in the assault kit also as a Battle rifle. THe G3A3 is the only battle rifle in the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of the HK417 being in recon they could have put in a modernized Saiga 308 or the Mk12 SPR.&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from that I rather do like the DLC and the weapons. [[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 10:20, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they put the SCAR-L in the Assault kit because they needed to do a little balancing with the SCAR-H and -L.  If the lower-powered one was the one with the shorter barrel, and therefore range, the higher-powered one would be chosen, whether it was in the same kit or not, because of its higher power and range.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:25, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACR is apparently using the 6.5 Grendel round, if the Battlelog weapon profile is anything to go by. -- Long Fallen 15:53, 8 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, that's probably why it has a 26-round magazine instead of a 30-rounder.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:34, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The damage of this gun is actually a lot different from other engineer guns. Unlike M4/AKS-74U and etc, it does less damage in close range, but it does more damage than other carbines. Is that an accrate representation of 6.5 Grendel round?? [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]]  11:40, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86= A1 or A2? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the page, it says that the L86 in-game is an A1, mislabeled as an A2.  However, if that was because of the charging handle, I've heard of L85A1's and L86A1's upgraded in the field to A2 retaining their old A1 charging handle.  Is there anything else that differentiates the L86A1 and A2?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:21, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;upgraded in the field&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:You can do that? Last time I checked most of the A2 upgrades were armourer / factory level changes that can't be done by the average squaddie in the field. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:58, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That's what I heard, maybe a gunsmith in the field upgraded it for the rest of the people in his squad/platoon/other organisation level in the military.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:59, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L86 has the same charging handle as the L85 in game, if that makes a difference. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 06:04, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it's missing the guard around the magazine catch that was added to the A2. Also, I don't know what the hell is going on [[:File:Bf3_l86a2_bolt.jpg|here.]] It's not &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot; because A. The SA80 bolt release is on the other side of the weapon, and B. you can't slap it anyway. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 06:48, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot;, as there is a bolt release catch on the left side of the weapon  just above the fire selector (where he is slapping). On SA80 weapons there is a catch on the right side behind the ejection port which you use to hold the bolt open, but there is a separate release catch on the left side. If you empty a magazine and the bolt locks back, to reload the weapon you just have the change the magazine and press the catch up to release the bolt and chamber the first round. You are correct that it doesn't have the shield around the mag release indicating that it is based on an A1 (or an inaccurate airsoft A2). Also, there were no field upgraded A2 weapons, the upgrade was carried out in a factory by H&amp;amp;K. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:34, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, than I guess it is an A1.  Thanks, Commando.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  2:00, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's an A1 with an A2 charging handle? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:29, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Does anyone have a shot where you see the charging handle, as there are none on the main page.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:00, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Edit: I just searched on youtube for some vids of it and it is very hard to see the charging handle clearly, but it is visible when you vault over things and it appears to be a standard round A1 handle rather than the comma shaped A2 handle. In fact now that I'm thinking about it, the A2 flash hider pokes upwards higher than the top of the receiver, so if it was an A2 handle you should be able to see it from the regular view anyway. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:10, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The L86 is an A1, I think? The charging handle is straight, and not the crescent/comma shaped one from the L85A2. You can see it clearly here. [[File:l86 a1 charge handle.jpg|400px|thumb|none]] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:38, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
That confirms it then, just a straight L86A1.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:43, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad that DICE seems to at least understand the difference between the A1 and A2, because the L86 in the trailer was called L86A1, and they might have changed it to A2 to rid it of the horrid reputation of the A1.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:08, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Armoured Kill ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info out! Can anyone help on IDs? The AC-130 is obvious, and the Quad appears to be the BC2 one. There's a pair of Mobile Artillery, and a pair of &amp;quot;Tank Destroyers&amp;quot;. I'm not that good with vehicles, but I see a tank that looks like a T-52? T-72? Something Soviet. Also, what looks like a Stryker with a huge cannon. US Mobile Artillery? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:35, 11 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/823-ac-130-not-driveable/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/826-battlefield-3-dlc-armored-kill-g4tv/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/822-ac-130-plus-bandar-desert-screens/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the Styker is the M1128 Mobile Gun system (unless there's another Stryker which carries a big gun), so I think that would make it one of the 'tank destroyers'. I don't think the tank is a T-72, the hull doesn't look right. [[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian vehicle looks like a 2S25 Sprut airborne tank destroyer. --[[User:AK-74Fan|AK-74Fan]] 10:45, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe you're both right. I looked up the Sprut, it's basically a BMD-3 with a tank cannon, which matches the Stryker nicely. That gives us our two tank destroyers, so we have yet to see either mobile artillery vehicles yet. EDIT: BF Wiki says that's right, and that the MA are the M142 HIMARS and the BM-21 Grad. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:19, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a teaser video for the Battlefield 3 premium release that showed the wire outlines for the Grad and the HIMAR but no action video unless you count the Grads in the Single player mission called &amp;quot;Thunder run&amp;quot; I think. Also the box art for the armoured kill expansion shows a H-60 Blackhawk so that might be included as well. -[[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, the Blackhawk's just on the box art again. Premium confirms we know everything, 20 guns, 10 vehicles. 10 guns in Karkand and 10 in CQB. Three vehicles in Karkand, six in Armoured Kill, plus the motorcycle in End Game. That's everything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:22, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wait, so we're not getting any new weapons in Armored Kill? I thought DICE said we were getting 10 new guns in each expansion? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 12:31, 16 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, there's rumoured Mk 14, but as far as I know, no. They said 20 guns, that's 10 in Karkand, 10 in CQ. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:36, 17 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That explains it, when I saw the 10 vehicles I forgot about the ones from Karkand and thought 10 new vehicles. I thought it was seemed out of place for an Army Blackhawk when the Marine UH-1Y is already in the game. That bugged me in BF2. [[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACR in 6.5mm Grendel? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I just wonder that the expected caliber for the ACR is 6.5*39mm Grendel. Can please somebody explain this exception to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U used to expect 6.8*43mm SPC, because of the capacity of 26 Bullets in the STANAG Shaped Magazine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The usual STANAG Shape Capacity of the 6.8 SPC is around 25 and the 6.8mm SPC base diameter in 10,72 cm. The Grendels base diameter in 11,15, so I expect a lightly smaller Mag Capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And isn't it more explicable that Remingtron delivers his own weapons in its own caliber first?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, this is not a fixed opinion but more like a thought, that we might say that the 6,8 SPC is a possible caliber to. [[User:RRT877|RRT(//]] 10:52, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Copied directly from Battlelog- ''This adaptive combat rifle features a number of recent rifle designs and acts as a lightweight, feature heavy, rifle platform. '''Using the modern, recoil-reducing “Grendel” round,''' as well as being built to endure rough weather conditions and capable of utilizing standard STANAG magazines, this rifle is equipped to fill many of the roles required by both military and law enforcement uses.'' However, the ammunition specs say ''30 rounds [5.56x45mm NATO]''.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:16, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the &amp;quot;ACR 6.8&amp;quot; in MW3 also had a 30-round capacity and it was using PMags. Developers don't really care about stuff like this being real. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 12:38, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Infinity Ward, sure, but DICE puts way more effort into making their games realistic.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the ACR unlocked, and the mag curve definitely isn't 5.56x45. If you guys want I can grab a screenshot of it to clear it up? [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:08, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking that DICE originally intended to make it in 5.56, but changed the model to 6.8 and forgot to update the Battlelog specs.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well regardless of their first intention, I say we go off the magazine curve. Which is here[http://i.imgur.com/7zNVl.jpg] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:10, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wasn't suggesting that we should go off of their first intention, but rather trying to figure out why Battlelog is so drastically different from the in-game model (which is clearly a 6.8)--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 18:30, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think they pay as much attention to battelog. The QBZ-95B and QBU-88 were both listed as the wrong caliber, and the assignment images are all over the place. According to it's Assignment image, the Mk3A1 is chamber in .223 remington. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:33, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank to you for clearing this. So Our Point is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model: 6,8 SPC&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog: 5,56mm / 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
Stats: 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you sight this? [[User:RRT877|RRT877]] 11:29, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Do all of these bullpup weapons actually have bolt releases?  I guess other games like Rainbow Six have kinda drilled me on using the charging handle on weapons like the AUG and SA80&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Is it technically incorrect for Marines to be using 240B's?  I've read a few articles, as well as seen pictures of Marines with 240's equipped with the rails and heat shields characteristic of a 240 Bravo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know about the AUG, info on the L85 is hard to come by, but from what I've found it does have a bolt catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:44, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
As there is a bit of confusiong and lack of information out there, I'll give a little run down on the controls.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sa80-l85a2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
The bolt handle is obvious, being the curved piece of dark plastic at the front of the bolt. The large green piece of plastic behind this is a dust cover that opens when the bolt moves back (it doesn't close when the bolt goes forward again, it has to be manually closed). Behind and below the dust cover is a small green plastic catch which is the bolt hold-open catch. The way that you are meant to use the hold open catch is to reach over the top of the weapon with your left hand, pull the bolt back with the side of your index finger, and when the bolt is fully retracted you push down on the catch with your thumb. It isn't really visible in this shot, but the safety is a cross-bolt above the trigger.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't a great pic of the left side but it is the only one on here. The fire selector is at the bottom of the weapon, half way between the magazine and the butt pad. The lower position is &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; for automatic and the upper is &amp;quot;R&amp;quot; for repetition (semi-automatic). Just above and forward of this there is a square catch just below the cheek rest. This is the bolt release, and when the bolt is held back you pull it down to release the bolt. Not sure if just slapping it on the side would actually work, but in essence the reload animation is correct. However, just realised that the model for the L85A2 is missing the fence around the magazine relese. My guess is that they reused the receiver model from the L86A1 and just put the correct charging handle on it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:45, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, you push it down, okay :) Thanks for the info [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:25, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== m-tar 21 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know how the m-tar mounts accessories? The front grip doesn't appear to have any rails&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you look at the picture in Battlelog, you can see that there are rails on the in-game model. This is not inaccurate, as rails can be mounted.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 14:00, 26 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Correct Dragunov SVD? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recently got the Mastery dogtag for the SVD and I think It's the correct version and not the NDM-86?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/Finncq/dogtags/245528281/ps3/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Kona|Kona]] 10:38, 22 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like it is the proper one. A number of the Mastery dog tags do that, the MG36 comes to mind. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:38, 23 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk. 14??? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the page, and I saw Mk. 14 Mod 0 in the Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles category.  Now, naturally, I was confused, because there was no confirmed Mk. 14 in any footage of anything about the game.  Then, I clicked it and was taken to its space on the page, and it said it was seen in Armored Kill gameplay in the hands of the Engineer class.  First off, even if the the Mk. 14 was in the game, it wouldn't a carbine, so it was probably picked up by the Engineer.  Second, DICE previously confirmed that '''there would be no new weapons in Armored Kill'''.  So, that wasn't a Mk. 14, that was an M39 picked up by an Engineer.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 00:16, 30 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 is rumored to be an all-kit weapon in Armored Kill. If they do that, I think the G3A3 should become all-kit, too, kinda like Bad Company. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 09:20, 30 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=595946</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=595946"/>
		<updated>2012-07-30T14:20:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Mk. 14??? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This M136 guy, Matkovic, is Navy EOD attached to Blackburn's Force Recon unit, which is why he isn't present in all of the missions.  Despite the fact that EOD doesn't work this closely with other units, that is the reasoning for his alternate appearance - [[User:Tangero2325|Tangero2325]] 9:55, 18 June 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, I've got a pair of ammo boxes, and THEY have designations (M19A1). - Wantabs_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - S9771773G 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Javelin dogtag looks so cool. I can't wait to get to 500 kills with it. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:16, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  *EDITED*  No, when I said &amp;quot;continuous fire&amp;quot;, I meant in MW3, you continually fire as if it automatically switched its magazines, instead of actually having to manually switch it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
EoghanG93 22-4-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The in game magazine capacity is 30. So I doubt it would be, someone would've picked up on that mistake by now. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 01:24, 27 April 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubtful, the MG36 and the QBB are mysteriously missing their &amp;quot;extended mag&amp;quot; attachments, leading to the unfortunate scene of a perpetually capped off Beta C-Mag. :S -- Long Fallen 02:02, 16 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The QBB is only supposed to have 75, so that was good, I think they just forgot to up the default capacity of the MG36 when they removed the attachements. Also, those two also got a heavy barrel option, and the AS Val got a 30 round mag option. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:15, 17 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After June patch, RPK Ext. magazine is gone. However, they introduced Ext. Magazine for M27 IAR, and MG36 is still missing extended magazine and it's limited to fire only 51 rounds.....Nice job DICE! [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]] 11:52, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::LOL! Baby steps... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:10, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donya Fortress Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this for the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LipJK6nxEw&amp;amp;feature=g-u-u&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Confirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*SPAS-12 (fired in pump action)&lt;br /&gt;
*AUGA3&lt;br /&gt;
*ACR (Called ACW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*JNG-90 &lt;br /&gt;
*L86 (Seen at 1:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Unconfirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*LSAT Machine Gun (Used by Engineer at 0:29 and seen in killfeed)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown compact AK variant (Seen at 1:11, carried by Engineer, looks different from AKS-74U)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown long barrelled Revolver (Also seen at 1:11, carried by a Support)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thats all I can spot [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:05, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M417 appears in the Killfeed. [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/File:M417.jpg Sauce.] [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:32, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm betting it's the semi-auto sniper for the recon kit [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:49, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The fact it's seen being used by a Recon kit at around 1:05 with an EoTech and a suppressor lends credence to the idea.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:54, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like a standard 74U to me, but that pistol doesn't really look like anything. I found the MP5K, it's at 0:50. As far as I can tell this just confirms the SPAS-12 is pump, the MP5K is the SMG, and the other sniper is the JNG-90, which I'd never heard of before. Also, they updated the &amp;quot;AUG&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;AUG A3&amp;quot; since the last trailer :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:45, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm pretty content with the weapons selection now that we've pretty much seen all of them.  I'm kind of hoping that the SPAS-12 is both pump-action and semi-auto, though.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From the press release: ''•Earn 10 new weapons and bring them back to the base game including: 1.AUG Assault Rifle, 2.SCAR Assault Rifle, 3.ACW-R Carbine, 4.MTAR-21 Carbine, 5.M417 Sniper Rifle, 6.JNG-90 Sniper Rifle, 7.L86LSW Machine Gun, 8.LSAT Machine Gun, 9.M5K Tactical Machine Pistol, 10.PAS-12 Shotgun'' [[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 06:18, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good, the SCAR-L is an AR and the ACR is a carbine, that's what I was hoping for, and the only thing we didn't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:29, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you ever see the charging handle of the SG 553, as I'm wondering whether it is genuinely an SG 553 or a mislabelled SG 552 (charging handle is the only deffinite difference). The gun picture is actually a mislabelled SG 552.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:20, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  You can look at the right side of weapons in-game by putting them on a bipod and rotating them. What exactly is the definitive difference between the 552 and 533, other than the RIS? --[[User:ArrowTwoActual|ArrowTwoActual]] 19:07, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter how many times I look at, or just think of, the MP7 rounds ''this'' big I have hilarity induced seizures. Thanks for the unending joy,  but I am suing you for giving me epilepsy. --[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 11:35, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...what? &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 01:13, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the screen shots for the MP7 shows the reload animation without a magazine, so the animation looks like the player is gesturing how big the bullets would be.--[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 01:26, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's pretty funny, as are a lot of the other ones. Whoever does those captions, I don't know if it's everyone or one really funny person, but thank you :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:52, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Missing Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I noticed we're still missing a in game screenshots of some of the BtK weapons. I loaded up fraps and snapped a few of the ones I have unlocked. I'm missing the QBU-88 QBZ-95B the L96 and the MK3A1, but I have a few good shots of the rest. Screwed up catching images of some of the charging animations though. Also, the charging animation on the L85 looks like it's just smacking the cheek rest. Photo album is here: [http://imgur.com/a/j38Rv] I'll let someone more senior that me decide which photos to add, it's been a while since I edited a wiki. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:29, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is correct for an L85, there is a bolt release catch underneath the cheek rest on the left side of the gun. When you empty a magazine the bolt will lock back, so you just need to change the magazine and push the catch up to chamber the first round. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:11, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for that Commando, info on the L85 seems hard to find. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:56, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the patch hsa changed the PP-19to be chambered in the 9x18mm Makarov, would it be at all possible to have the screenshot of the loadout screen to represent the change? It currently shows it pre-patch where its still in the 9x19mm Parabellum. I'd do it myself but I only have it for 360 and I don't know how. Thanks. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:58, 13 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How do we know the M1911 in this game is an M-45 MEU(SOC)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real life picture provided shows the pistol with U.S. Army markings. How do we know the in-game M1911 is actually an MEUSOC?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines.&amp;quot; That's an exact match to the 1st-gen MEUSOC pisotls. As for why it has army markings, it was probably built on a standard Army M1911A1, but I don't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:57, 16 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Close Quarters Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I bought Premium, and I've unlocked a few of the guns. Uploaded some screens, and I'm gonna start adding them into the page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the SCAR-L, AUG-A3, ACR, HK417, SPAS-12, L86A2. I can't unlock the MP5K or the JNG-90 until the maps are unlocked on PC, but I'll add the LSAT and MTAR-21 screens when I unlock them. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:05, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added missing screens of the L85A2, MG36, QBB-95, LSAT, MTAR-21. Still have the QBU-88 sniper rifle and the L96/G22 to add. Too tired to add them now. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:21, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CQ Weapons Comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was disappointed to see the ACR in the carbine kit although it's the full length version with a fixed stock. I was hoping they'd put the SCAR-L in the carbine kit instead, as the SCAR-H already is there.&lt;br /&gt;
I Also liked if the HK417 was in the assault kit also as a Battle rifle. THe G3A3 is the only battle rifle in the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of the HK417 being in recon they could have put in a modernized Saiga 308 or the Mk12 SPR.&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from that I rather do like the DLC and the weapons. [[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 10:20, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they put the SCAR-L in the Assault kit because they needed to do a little balancing with the SCAR-H and -L.  If the lower-powered one was the one with the shorter barrel, and therefore range, the higher-powered one would be chosen, whether it was in the same kit or not, because of its higher power and range.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:25, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACR is apparently using the 6.5 Grendel round, if the Battlelog weapon profile is anything to go by. -- Long Fallen 15:53, 8 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, that's probably why it has a 26-round magazine instead of a 30-rounder.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:34, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The damage of this gun is actually a lot different from other engineer guns. Unlike M4/AKS-74U and etc, it does less damage in close range, but it does more damage than other carbines. Is that an accrate representation of 6.5 Grendel round?? [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]]  11:40, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86= A1 or A2? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the page, it says that the L86 in-game is an A1, mislabeled as an A2.  However, if that was because of the charging handle, I've heard of L85A1's and L86A1's upgraded in the field to A2 retaining their old A1 charging handle.  Is there anything else that differentiates the L86A1 and A2?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:21, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;upgraded in the field&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:You can do that? Last time I checked most of the A2 upgrades were armourer / factory level changes that can't be done by the average squaddie in the field. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:58, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That's what I heard, maybe a gunsmith in the field upgraded it for the rest of the people in his squad/platoon/other organisation level in the military.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:59, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L86 has the same charging handle as the L85 in game, if that makes a difference. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 06:04, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it's missing the guard around the magazine catch that was added to the A2. Also, I don't know what the hell is going on [[:File:Bf3_l86a2_bolt.jpg|here.]] It's not &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot; because A. The SA80 bolt release is on the other side of the weapon, and B. you can't slap it anyway. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 06:48, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot;, as there is a bolt release catch on the left side of the weapon  just above the fire selector (where he is slapping). On SA80 weapons there is a catch on the right side behind the ejection port which you use to hold the bolt open, but there is a separate release catch on the left side. If you empty a magazine and the bolt locks back, to reload the weapon you just have the change the magazine and press the catch up to release the bolt and chamber the first round. You are correct that it doesn't have the shield around the mag release indicating that it is based on an A1 (or an inaccurate airsoft A2). Also, there were no field upgraded A2 weapons, the upgrade was carried out in a factory by H&amp;amp;K. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:34, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, than I guess it is an A1.  Thanks, Commando.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  2:00, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's an A1 with an A2 charging handle? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:29, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Does anyone have a shot where you see the charging handle, as there are none on the main page.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:00, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Edit: I just searched on youtube for some vids of it and it is very hard to see the charging handle clearly, but it is visible when you vault over things and it appears to be a standard round A1 handle rather than the comma shaped A2 handle. In fact now that I'm thinking about it, the A2 flash hider pokes upwards higher than the top of the receiver, so if it was an A2 handle you should be able to see it from the regular view anyway. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:10, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The L86 is an A1, I think? The charging handle is straight, and not the crescent/comma shaped one from the L85A2. You can see it clearly here. [[File:l86 a1 charge handle.jpg|400px|thumb|none]] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:38, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
That confirms it then, just a straight L86A1.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:43, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad that DICE seems to at least understand the difference between the A1 and A2, because the L86 in the trailer was called L86A1, and they might have changed it to A2 to rid it of the horrid reputation of the A1.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:08, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Armoured Kill ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info out! Can anyone help on IDs? The AC-130 is obvious, and the Quad appears to be the BC2 one. There's a pair of Mobile Artillery, and a pair of &amp;quot;Tank Destroyers&amp;quot;. I'm not that good with vehicles, but I see a tank that looks like a T-52? T-72? Something Soviet. Also, what looks like a Stryker with a huge cannon. US Mobile Artillery? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:35, 11 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/823-ac-130-not-driveable/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/826-battlefield-3-dlc-armored-kill-g4tv/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/822-ac-130-plus-bandar-desert-screens/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the Styker is the M1128 Mobile Gun system (unless there's another Stryker which carries a big gun), so I think that would make it one of the 'tank destroyers'. I don't think the tank is a T-72, the hull doesn't look right. [[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian vehicle looks like a 2S25 Sprut airborne tank destroyer. --[[User:AK-74Fan|AK-74Fan]] 10:45, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe you're both right. I looked up the Sprut, it's basically a BMD-3 with a tank cannon, which matches the Stryker nicely. That gives us our two tank destroyers, so we have yet to see either mobile artillery vehicles yet. EDIT: BF Wiki says that's right, and that the MA are the M142 HIMARS and the BM-21 Grad. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:19, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a teaser video for the Battlefield 3 premium release that showed the wire outlines for the Grad and the HIMAR but no action video unless you count the Grads in the Single player mission called &amp;quot;Thunder run&amp;quot; I think. Also the box art for the armoured kill expansion shows a H-60 Blackhawk so that might be included as well. -[[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, the Blackhawk's just on the box art again. Premium confirms we know everything, 20 guns, 10 vehicles. 10 guns in Karkand and 10 in CQB. Three vehicles in Karkand, six in Armoured Kill, plus the motorcycle in End Game. That's everything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:22, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wait, so we're not getting any new weapons in Armored Kill? I thought DICE said we were getting 10 new guns in each expansion? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 12:31, 16 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, there's rumoured Mk 14, but as far as I know, no. They said 20 guns, that's 10 in Karkand, 10 in CQ. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:36, 17 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That explains it, when I saw the 10 vehicles I forgot about the ones from Karkand and thought 10 new vehicles. I thought it was seemed out of place for an Army Blackhawk when the Marine UH-1Y is already in the game. That bugged me in BF2. [[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACR in 6.5mm Grendel? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I just wonder that the expected caliber for the ACR is 6.5*39mm Grendel. Can please somebody explain this exception to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U used to expect 6.8*43mm SPC, because of the capacity of 26 Bullets in the STANAG Shaped Magazine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The usual STANAG Shape Capacity of the 6.8 SPC is around 25 and the 6.8mm SPC base diameter in 10,72 cm. The Grendels base diameter in 11,15, so I expect a lightly smaller Mag Capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And isn't it more explicable that Remingtron delivers his own weapons in its own caliber first?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, this is not a fixed opinion but more like a thought, that we might say that the 6,8 SPC is a possible caliber to. [[User:RRT877|RRT(//]] 10:52, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Copied directly from Battlelog- ''This adaptive combat rifle features a number of recent rifle designs and acts as a lightweight, feature heavy, rifle platform. '''Using the modern, recoil-reducing “Grendel” round,''' as well as being built to endure rough weather conditions and capable of utilizing standard STANAG magazines, this rifle is equipped to fill many of the roles required by both military and law enforcement uses.'' However, the ammunition specs say ''30 rounds [5.56x45mm NATO]''.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:16, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the &amp;quot;ACR 6.8&amp;quot; in MW3 also had a 30-round capacity and it was using PMags. Developers don't really care about stuff like this being real. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 12:38, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Infinity Ward, sure, but DICE puts way more effort into making their games realistic.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the ACR unlocked, and the mag curve definitely isn't 5.56x45. If you guys want I can grab a screenshot of it to clear it up? [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:08, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking that DICE originally intended to make it in 5.56, but changed the model to 6.8 and forgot to update the Battlelog specs.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well regardless of their first intention, I say we go off the magazine curve. Which is here[http://i.imgur.com/7zNVl.jpg] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:10, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wasn't suggesting that we should go off of their first intention, but rather trying to figure out why Battlelog is so drastically different from the in-game model (which is clearly a 6.8)--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 18:30, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think they pay as much attention to battelog. The QBZ-95B and QBU-88 were both listed as the wrong caliber, and the assignment images are all over the place. According to it's Assignment image, the Mk3A1 is chamber in .223 remington. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:33, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank to you for clearing this. So Our Point is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model: 6,8 SPC&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog: 5,56mm / 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
Stats: 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you sight this? [[User:RRT877|RRT877]] 11:29, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Do all of these bullpup weapons actually have bolt releases?  I guess other games like Rainbow Six have kinda drilled me on using the charging handle on weapons like the AUG and SA80&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Is it technically incorrect for Marines to be using 240B's?  I've read a few articles, as well as seen pictures of Marines with 240's equipped with the rails and heat shields characteristic of a 240 Bravo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know about the AUG, info on the L85 is hard to come by, but from what I've found it does have a bolt catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:44, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
As there is a bit of confusiong and lack of information out there, I'll give a little run down on the controls.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sa80-l85a2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
The bolt handle is obvious, being the curved piece of dark plastic at the front of the bolt. The large green piece of plastic behind this is a dust cover that opens when the bolt moves back (it doesn't close when the bolt goes forward again, it has to be manually closed). Behind and below the dust cover is a small green plastic catch which is the bolt hold-open catch. The way that you are meant to use the hold open catch is to reach over the top of the weapon with your left hand, pull the bolt back with the side of your index finger, and when the bolt is fully retracted you push down on the catch with your thumb. It isn't really visible in this shot, but the safety is a cross-bolt above the trigger.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't a great pic of the left side but it is the only one on here. The fire selector is at the bottom of the weapon, half way between the magazine and the butt pad. The lower position is &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; for automatic and the upper is &amp;quot;R&amp;quot; for repetition (semi-automatic). Just above and forward of this there is a square catch just below the cheek rest. This is the bolt release, and when the bolt is held back you pull it down to release the bolt. Not sure if just slapping it on the side would actually work, but in essence the reload animation is correct. However, just realised that the model for the L85A2 is missing the fence around the magazine relese. My guess is that they reused the receiver model from the L86A1 and just put the correct charging handle on it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:45, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, you push it down, okay :) Thanks for the info [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:25, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== m-tar 21 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know how the m-tar mounts accessories? The front grip doesn't appear to have any rails&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you look at the picture in Battlelog, you can see that there are rails on the in-game model. This is not inaccurate, as rails can be mounted.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 14:00, 26 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Correct Dragunov SVD? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recently got the Mastery dogtag for the SVD and I think It's the correct version and not the NDM-86?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/Finncq/dogtags/245528281/ps3/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Kona|Kona]] 10:38, 22 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like it is the proper one. A number of the Mastery dog tags do that, the MG36 comes to mind. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:38, 23 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk. 14??? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the page, and I saw Mk. 14 Mod 0 in the Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles category.  Now, naturally, I was confused, because there was no confirmed Mk. 14 in any footage of anything about the game.  Then, I clicked it and was taken to its space on the page, and it said it was seen in Armored Kill gameplay in the hands of the Engineer class.  First off, even if the the Mk. 14 was in the game, it wouldn't a carbine, so it was probably picked up by the Engineer.  Second, DICE previously confirmed that '''there would be no new weapons in Armored Kill'''.  So, that wasn't a Mk. 14, that was an M39 picked up by an Engineer.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 00:16, 30 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 is rumored to be an all-kit weapon in Armored Kill. If the do that, I think the G3A3 should become all-kit, too, kinda like Bad Company. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 09:20, 30 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=590899</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=590899"/>
		<updated>2012-07-16T17:31:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Armoured Kill */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This M136 guy, Matkovic, is Navy EOD attached to Blackburn's Force Recon unit, which is why he isn't present in all of the missions.  Despite the fact that EOD doesn't work this closely with other units, that is the reasoning for his alternate appearance - [[User:Tangero2325|Tangero2325]] 9:55, 18 June 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, I've got a pair of ammo boxes, and THEY have designations (M19A1). - Wantabs_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - S9771773G 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Javelin dogtag looks so cool. I can't wait to get to 500 kills with it. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:16, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  *EDITED*  No, when I said &amp;quot;continuous fire&amp;quot;, I meant in MW3, you continually fire as if it automatically switched its magazines, instead of actually having to manually switch it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
EoghanG93 22-4-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The in game magazine capacity is 30. So I doubt it would be, someone would've picked up on that mistake by now. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 01:24, 27 April 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubtful, the MG36 and the QBB are mysteriously missing their &amp;quot;extended mag&amp;quot; attachments, leading to the unfortunate scene of a perpetually capped off Beta C-Mag. :S -- Long Fallen 02:02, 16 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The QBB is only supposed to have 75, so that was good, I think they just forgot to up the default capacity of the MG36 when they removed the attachements. Also, those two also got a heavy barrel option, and the AS Val got a 30 round mag option. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:15, 17 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After June patch, RPK Ext. magazine is gone. However, they introduced Ext. Magazine for M27 IAR, and MG36 is still missing extended magazine and it's limited to fire only 51 rounds.....Nice job DICE! [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]] 11:52, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::LOL! Baby steps... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:10, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donya Fortress Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this for the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LipJK6nxEw&amp;amp;feature=g-u-u&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Confirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*SPAS-12 (fired in pump action)&lt;br /&gt;
*AUGA3&lt;br /&gt;
*ACR (Called ACW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*JNG-90 &lt;br /&gt;
*L86 (Seen at 1:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Unconfirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*LSAT Machine Gun (Used by Engineer at 0:29 and seen in killfeed)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown compact AK variant (Seen at 1:11, carried by Engineer, looks different from AKS-74U)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown long barrelled Revolver (Also seen at 1:11, carried by a Support)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thats all I can spot [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:05, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M417 appears in the Killfeed. [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/File:M417.jpg Sauce.] [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:32, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm betting it's the semi-auto sniper for the recon kit [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:49, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The fact it's seen being used by a Recon kit at around 1:05 with an EoTech and a suppressor lends credence to the idea.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:54, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like a standard 74U to me, but that pistol doesn't really look like anything. I found the MP5K, it's at 0:50. As far as I can tell this just confirms the SPAS-12 is pump, the MP5K is the SMG, and the other sniper is the JNG-90, which I'd never heard of before. Also, they updated the &amp;quot;AUG&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;AUG A3&amp;quot; since the last trailer :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:45, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm pretty content with the weapons selection now that we've pretty much seen all of them.  I'm kind of hoping that the SPAS-12 is both pump-action and semi-auto, though.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From the press release: ''•Earn 10 new weapons and bring them back to the base game including: 1.AUG Assault Rifle, 2.SCAR Assault Rifle, 3.ACW-R Carbine, 4.MTAR-21 Carbine, 5.M417 Sniper Rifle, 6.JNG-90 Sniper Rifle, 7.L86LSW Machine Gun, 8.LSAT Machine Gun, 9.M5K Tactical Machine Pistol, 10.PAS-12 Shotgun'' [[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 06:18, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good, the SCAR-L is an AR and the ACR is a carbine, that's what I was hoping for, and the only thing we didn't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:29, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you ever see the charging handle of the SG 553, as I'm wondering whether it is genuinely an SG 553 or a mislabelled SG 552 (charging handle is the only deffinite difference). The gun picture is actually a mislabelled SG 552.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:20, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  You can look at the right side of weapons in-game by putting them on a bipod and rotating them. What exactly is the definitive difference between the 552 and 533, other than the RIS? --[[User:ArrowTwoActual|ArrowTwoActual]] 19:07, 13 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter how many times I look at, or just think of, the MP7 rounds ''this'' big I have hilarity induced seizures. Thanks for the unending joy,  but I am suing you for giving me epilepsy. --[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 11:35, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...what? &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 01:13, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the screen shots for the MP7 shows the reload animation without a magazine, so the animation looks like the player is gesturing how big the bullets would be.--[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 01:26, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's pretty funny, as are a lot of the other ones. Whoever does those captions, I don't know if it's everyone or one really funny person, but thank you :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:52, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Missing Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I noticed we're still missing a in game screenshots of some of the BtK weapons. I loaded up fraps and snapped a few of the ones I have unlocked. I'm missing the QBU-88 QBZ-95B the L96 and the MK3A1, but I have a few good shots of the rest. Screwed up catching images of some of the charging animations though. Also, the charging animation on the L85 looks like it's just smacking the cheek rest. Photo album is here: [http://imgur.com/a/j38Rv] I'll let someone more senior that me decide which photos to add, it's been a while since I edited a wiki. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:29, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is correct for an L85, there is a bolt release catch underneath the cheek rest on the left side of the gun. When you empty a magazine the bolt will lock back, so you just need to change the magazine and push the catch up to chamber the first round. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:11, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for that Commando, info on the L85 seems hard to find. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:56, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the patch hsa changed the PP-19to be chambered in the 9x18mm Makarov, would it be at all possible to have the screenshot of the loadout screen to represent the change? It currently shows it pre-patch where its still in the 9x19mm Parabellum. I'd do it myself but I only have it for 360 and I don't know how. Thanks. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:58, 13 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How do we know the M1911 in this game is an M-45 MEU(SOC)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real life picture provided shows the pistol with U.S. Army markings. How do we know the in-game M1911 is actually an MEUSOC?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines.&amp;quot; That's an exact match to the 1st-gen MEUSOC pisotls. As for why it has army markings, it was probably built on a standard Army M1911A1, but I don't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:57, 16 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Close Quarters Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I bought Premium, and I've unlocked a few of the guns. Uploaded some screens, and I'm gonna start adding them into the page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the SCAR-L, AUG-A3, ACR, HK417, SPAS-12, L86A2. I can't unlock the MP5K or the JNG-90 until the maps are unlocked on PC, but I'll add the LSAT and MTAR-21 screens when I unlock them. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:05, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added missing screens of the L85A2, MG36, QBB-95, LSAT, MTAR-21. Still have the QBU-88 sniper rifle and the L96/G22 to add. Too tired to add them now. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:21, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CQ Weapons Comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was disappointed to see the ACR in the carbine kit although it's the full length version with a fixed stock. I was hoping they'd put the SCAR-L in the carbine kit instead, as the SCAR-H already is there.&lt;br /&gt;
I Also liked if the HK417 was in the assault kit also as a Battle rifle. THe G3A3 is the only battle rifle in the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of the HK417 being in recon they could have put in a modernized Saiga 308 or the Mk12 SPR.&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from that I rather do like the DLC and the weapons. [[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 10:20, 6 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they put the SCAR-L in the Assault kit because they needed to do a little balancing with the SCAR-H and -L.  If the lower-powered one was the one with the shorter barrel, and therefore range, the higher-powered one would be chosen, whether it was in the same kit or not, because of its higher power and range.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:25, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACR is apparently using the 6.5 Grendel round, if the Battlelog weapon profile is anything to go by. -- Long Fallen 15:53, 8 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, that's probably why it has a 26-round magazine instead of a 30-rounder.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:34, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The damage of this gun is actually a lot different from other engineer guns. Unlike M4/AKS-74U and etc, it does less damage in close range, but it does more damage than other carbines. Is that an accrate representation of 6.5 Grendel round?? [[User:Zzang1847|Zzang1847]]  11:40, 13 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86= A1 or A2? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the page, it says that the L86 in-game is an A1, mislabeled as an A2.  However, if that was because of the charging handle, I've heard of L85A1's and L86A1's upgraded in the field to A2 retaining their old A1 charging handle.  Is there anything else that differentiates the L86A1 and A2?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  7:21, 9 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;upgraded in the field&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:You can do that? Last time I checked most of the A2 upgrades were armourer / factory level changes that can't be done by the average squaddie in the field. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:58, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That's what I heard, maybe a gunsmith in the field upgraded it for the rest of the people in his squad/platoon/other organisation level in the military.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  1:59, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L86 has the same charging handle as the L85 in game, if that makes a difference. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 06:04, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it's missing the guard around the magazine catch that was added to the A2. Also, I don't know what the hell is going on [[:File:Bf3_l86a2_bolt.jpg|here.]] It's not &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot; because A. The SA80 bolt release is on the other side of the weapon, and B. you can't slap it anyway. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 06:48, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is &amp;quot;slapping the bolt catch&amp;quot;, as there is a bolt release catch on the left side of the weapon  just above the fire selector (where he is slapping). On SA80 weapons there is a catch on the right side behind the ejection port which you use to hold the bolt open, but there is a separate release catch on the left side. If you empty a magazine and the bolt locks back, to reload the weapon you just have the change the magazine and press the catch up to release the bolt and chamber the first round. You are correct that it doesn't have the shield around the mag release indicating that it is based on an A1 (or an inaccurate airsoft A2). Also, there were no field upgraded A2 weapons, the upgrade was carried out in a factory by H&amp;amp;K. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:34, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, than I guess it is an A1.  Thanks, Commando.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  2:00, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's an A1 with an A2 charging handle? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:29, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Does anyone have a shot where you see the charging handle, as there are none on the main page.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:00, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Edit: I just searched on youtube for some vids of it and it is very hard to see the charging handle clearly, but it is visible when you vault over things and it appears to be a standard round A1 handle rather than the comma shaped A2 handle. In fact now that I'm thinking about it, the A2 flash hider pokes upwards higher than the top of the receiver, so if it was an A2 handle you should be able to see it from the regular view anyway. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:10, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The L86 is an A1, I think? The charging handle is straight, and not the crescent/comma shaped one from the L85A2. You can see it clearly here. [[File:l86 a1 charge handle.jpg|400px|thumb|none]] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:38, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
That confirms it then, just a straight L86A1.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:43, 10 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad that DICE seems to at least understand the difference between the A1 and A2, because the L86 in the trailer was called L86A1, and they might have changed it to A2 to rid it of the horrid reputation of the A1.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:08, 10 June 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Armoured Kill ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info out! Can anyone help on IDs? The AC-130 is obvious, and the Quad appears to be the BC2 one. There's a pair of Mobile Artillery, and a pair of &amp;quot;Tank Destroyers&amp;quot;. I'm not that good with vehicles, but I see a tank that looks like a T-52? T-72? Something Soviet. Also, what looks like a Stryker with a huge cannon. US Mobile Artillery? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:35, 11 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/823-ac-130-not-driveable/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/826-battlefield-3-dlc-armored-kill-g4tv/&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/news/822-ac-130-plus-bandar-desert-screens/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the Styker is the M1128 Mobile Gun system (unless there's another Stryker which carries a big gun), so I think that would make it one of the 'tank destroyers'. I don't think the tank is a T-72, the hull doesn't look right. [[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian vehicle looks like a 2S25 Sprut airborne tank destroyer. --[[User:AK-74Fan|AK-74Fan]] 10:45, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe you're both right. I looked up the Sprut, it's basically a BMD-3 with a tank cannon, which matches the Stryker nicely. That gives us our two tank destroyers, so we have yet to see either mobile artillery vehicles yet. EDIT: BF Wiki says that's right, and that the MA are the M142 HIMARS and the BM-21 Grad. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:19, 12 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a teaser video for the Battlefield 3 premium release that showed the wire outlines for the Grad and the HIMAR but no action video unless you count the Grads in the Single player mission called &amp;quot;Thunder run&amp;quot; I think. Also the box art for the armoured kill expansion shows a H-60 Blackhawk so that might be included as well. -[[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, the Blackhawk's just on the box art again. Premium confirms we know everything, 20 guns, 10 vehicles. 10 guns in Karkand and 10 in CQB. Three vehicles in Karkand, six in Armoured Kill, plus the motorcycle in End Game. That's everything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:22, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wait, so we're not getting any new weapons in Armored Kill? I thought DICE said we were getting 10 new guns in each expansion? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 12:31, 16 July 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That explains it, when I saw the 10 vehicles I forgot about the ones from Karkand and thought 10 new vehicles. I thought it was seemed out of place for an Army Blackhawk when the Marine UH-1Y is already in the game. That bugged me in BF2. [[User:Insertjjs|Insertjjs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACR in 6.5mm Grendel? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I just wonder that the expected caliber for the ACR is 6.5*39mm Grendel. Can please somebody explain this exception to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U used to expect 6.8*43mm SPC, because of the capacity of 26 Bullets in the STANAG Shaped Magazine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The usual STANAG Shape Capacity of the 6.8 SPC is around 25 and the 6.8mm SPC base diameter in 10,72 cm. The Grendels base diameter in 11,15, so I expect a lightly smaller Mag Capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And isn't it more explicable that Remingtron delivers his own weapons in its own caliber first?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, this is not a fixed opinion but more like a thought, that we might say that the 6,8 SPC is a possible caliber to. [[User:RRT877|RRT(//]] 10:52, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Copied directly from Battlelog- ''This adaptive combat rifle features a number of recent rifle designs and acts as a lightweight, feature heavy, rifle platform. '''Using the modern, recoil-reducing “Grendel” round,''' as well as being built to endure rough weather conditions and capable of utilizing standard STANAG magazines, this rifle is equipped to fill many of the roles required by both military and law enforcement uses.'' However, the ammunition specs say ''30 rounds [5.56x45mm NATO]''.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:16, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the &amp;quot;ACR 6.8&amp;quot; in MW3 also had a 30-round capacity and it was using PMags. Developers don't really care about stuff like this being real. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 12:38, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Infinity Ward, sure, but DICE puts way more effort into making their games realistic.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the ACR unlocked, and the mag curve definitely isn't 5.56x45. If you guys want I can grab a screenshot of it to clear it up? [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 17:08, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking that DICE originally intended to make it in 5.56, but changed the model to 6.8 and forgot to update the Battlelog specs.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 17:37, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well regardless of their first intention, I say we go off the magazine curve. Which is here[http://i.imgur.com/7zNVl.jpg] [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:10, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wasn't suggesting that we should go off of their first intention, but rather trying to figure out why Battlelog is so drastically different from the in-game model (which is clearly a 6.8)--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 18:30, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think they pay as much attention to battelog. The QBZ-95B and QBU-88 were both listed as the wrong caliber, and the assignment images are all over the place. According to it's Assignment image, the Mk3A1 is chamber in .223 remington. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:33, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank to you for clearing this. So Our Point is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model: 6,8 SPC&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog: 5,56mm / 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
Stats: 6,5 Grendel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you sight this? [[User:RRT877|RRT877]] 11:29, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Do all of these bullpup weapons actually have bolt releases?  I guess other games like Rainbow Six have kinda drilled me on using the charging handle on weapons like the AUG and SA80&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Is it technically incorrect for Marines to be using 240B's?  I've read a few articles, as well as seen pictures of Marines with 240's equipped with the rails and heat shields characteristic of a 240 Bravo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know about the AUG, info on the L85 is hard to come by, but from what I've found it does have a bolt catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:44, 18 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
As there is a bit of confusiong and lack of information out there, I'll give a little run down on the controls.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sa80-l85a2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
The bolt handle is obvious, being the curved piece of dark plastic at the front of the bolt. The large green piece of plastic behind this is a dust cover that opens when the bolt moves back (it doesn't close when the bolt goes forward again, it has to be manually closed). Behind and below the dust cover is a small green plastic catch which is the bolt hold-open catch. The way that you are meant to use the hold open catch is to reach over the top of the weapon with your left hand, pull the bolt back with the side of your index finger, and when the bolt is fully retracted you push down on the catch with your thumb. It isn't really visible in this shot, but the safety is a cross-bolt above the trigger.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't a great pic of the left side but it is the only one on here. The fire selector is at the bottom of the weapon, half way between the magazine and the butt pad. The lower position is &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; for automatic and the upper is &amp;quot;R&amp;quot; for repetition (semi-automatic). Just above and forward of this there is a square catch just below the cheek rest. This is the bolt release, and when the bolt is held back you pull it down to release the bolt. Not sure if just slapping it on the side would actually work, but in essence the reload animation is correct. However, just realised that the model for the L85A2 is missing the fence around the magazine relese. My guess is that they reused the receiver model from the L86A1 and just put the correct charging handle on it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:45, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, you push it down, okay :) Thanks for the info [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:25, 19 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== m-tar 21 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know how the m-tar mounts accessories? The front grip doesn't appear to have any rails&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you look at the picture in Battlelog, you can see that there are rails on the in-game model. This is not inaccurate, as rails can be mounted.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 14:00, 26 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562327</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562327"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T18:58:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* PP-19 */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, I've got a pair of ammo boxes, and THEY have designations (M19A1). - Wantabs_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Javelin dogtag looks so cool. I can't wait to get to 500 kills with it. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:16, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  *EDITED*  No, when I said &amp;quot;continuous fire&amp;quot;, I meant in MW3, you continually fire as if it automatically switched its magazines, instead of actually having to manually switch it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
EoghanG93 22-4-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The in game magazine capacity is 30. So I doubt it would be, someone would've picked up on that mistake by now. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 01:24, 27 April 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubtful, the MG36 and the QBB are mysteriously missing their &amp;quot;extended mag&amp;quot; attachments, leading to the unfortunate scene of a perpetually capped off Beta C-Mag. :S -- Long Fallen 02:02, 16 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The QBB is only supposed to have 75, so that was good, I think they just forgot to up the default capacity of the MG36 when they removed the attachements. Also, those two also got a heavy barrel option, and the AS Val got a 30 round mag option. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:15, 17 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donya Fortress Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this for the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LipJK6nxEw&amp;amp;feature=g-u-u&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Confirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*SPAS-12 (fired in pump action)&lt;br /&gt;
*AUGA3&lt;br /&gt;
*ACR (Called ACW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*JNG-90 &lt;br /&gt;
*L86 (Seen at 1:14)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapons seen (Unconfirmed):&lt;br /&gt;
*LSAT Machine Gun (Used by Engineer at 0:29 and seen in killfeed)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown compact AK variant (Seen at 1:11, carried by Engineer, looks different from AKS-74U)&lt;br /&gt;
*Unknown long barrelled Revolver (Also seen at 1:11, carried by a Support)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thats all I can spot [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:05, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M417 appears in the Killfeed. [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/File:M417.jpg Sauce.] [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:32, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm betting it's the semi-auto sniper for the recon kit [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:49, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The fact it's seen being used by a Recon kit at around 1:05 with an EoTech and a suppressor lends credence to the idea.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:54, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like a standard 74U to me, but that pistol doesn't really look like anything. I found the MP5K, it's at 0:50. As far as I can tell this just confirms the SPAS-12 is pump, the MP5K is the SMG, and the other sniper is the JNG-90, which I'd never heard of before. Also, they updated the &amp;quot;AUG&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;AUG A3&amp;quot; since the last trailer :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:45, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm pretty content with the weapons selection now that we've pretty much seen all of them.  I'm kind of hoping that the SPAS-12 is both pump-action and semi-auto, though.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From the press release: ''•Earn 10 new weapons and bring them back to the base game including: 1.AUG Assault Rifle, 2.SCAR Assault Rifle, 3.ACW-R Carbine, 4.MTAR-21 Carbine, 5.M417 Sniper Rifle, 6.JNG-90 Sniper Rifle, 7.L86LSW Machine Gun, 8.LSAT Machine Gun, 9.M5K Tactical Machine Pistol, 10.PAS-12 Shotgun'' [[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 06:18, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good, the SCAR-L is an AR and the ACR is a carbine, that's what I was hoping for, and the only thing we didn't know for sure. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:29, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you ever see the charging handle of the SG 553, as I'm wondering whether it is genuinely an SG 553 or a mislabelled SG 552 (charging handle is the only deffinite difference). The gun picture is actually a mislabelled SG 552.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:20, 26 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No matter how many times I look at, or just think of, the MP7 rounds ''this'' big I have hilarity induced seizures. Thanks for the unending joy,  but I am suing you for giving me epilepsy. --[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 11:35, 27 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...what? &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 01:13, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the screen shots for the MP7 shows the reload animation without a magazine, so the animation looks like the player is gesturing how big the bullets would be.--[[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 01:26, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's pretty funny, as are a lot of the other ones. Whoever does those captions, I don't know if it's everyone or one really funny person, but thank you :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:52, 28 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Missing Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I noticed we're still missing a in game screenshots of some of the BtK weapons. I loaded up fraps and snapped a few of the ones I have unlocked. I'm missing the QBU-88 QBZ-95B the L96 and the MK3A1, but I have a few good shots of the rest. Screwed up catching images of some of the charging animations though. Also, the charging animation on the L85 looks like it's just smacking the cheek rest. Photo album is here: [http://imgur.com/a/j38Rv] I'll let someone more senior that me decide which photos to add, it's been a while since I edited a wiki. [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 09:29, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is correct for an L85, there is a bolt release catch underneath the cheek rest on the left side of the gun. When you empty a magazine the bolt will lock back, so you just need to change the magazine and push the catch up to chamber the first round. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:11, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for that Commando, info on the L85 seems hard to find. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:56, 30 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the patch hsa changed the PP-19to be chambered in the 9x18mm Makarov, would it be at all possible to have the screenshot of the loadout screen to represent the change? It currently shows it pre-patch where its still in the 9x19mm Parabellum. I'd do it myself but I only have it for 360 and I don't know how. Thanks. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:58, 13 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562193</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562193"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T15:11:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* PP-19 Bizon */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same category, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own category at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM#Makarov PB|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has separate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance. The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53), although post-patch the PP-19 is now even more innacurate in that it was a 55 round magazine chambered in the 9x18mm Makarov, although this could very well be for balancing purposes, as DICE may have felt 64 rounds in an SMG would be a tad unfair. Also to note, the PP-19 is the only 9x18mm Makarov weapon in the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP5K ==&lt;br /&gt;
At about 44 seconds in the Close Quarters: Donya Fortress trailer, the following soldier is killed by penetration and dropping a MP5k&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD/Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in ''[[Battlefield 2]]''; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to ''Battlefield 2''. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD/Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds. The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet and doesn't actually show up on the gun. In fact, the only thing the suppressor does is take up an attachment slot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 10+1 (originally 8+1, following the maximum factory capacity, changed after the 4th update).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franchi SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] is one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  It will fire in the pump-action fire-mode.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SPAS12.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Franchi SPAS-12  - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS122.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SPAS-12 in the first person view]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four capital letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs. Interesting note about the way the player character reloads the AN-94, he flicks the magazine out with another magazine, the same applies to the AEK-971.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.  The March 2012 update added the option of using extended 30-round box magazines (the largest box mag available for the VSS/AS Val/SR-3 rifles) instead of the standard 20-rounders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal Weaponlight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabeled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1.  While the correct capacity can be obtained using the &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot; attachment, this option is no longer available for the PS3 (As of the March 27th, 2012 update), and the X360 (As of the rent-a-server patch) versions, with the Heavy Barrel attachment taking its place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customization menu.  Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch in December of 2011 removed the burst mode for PC, and as of the March 2012 patch, the Xbox 360 version's M416 has it removed as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22. The pilot of the Antonov is a big fan of ''[[Top Gun]]'' and is getting as much low-altitude fly-by practice in as he can before the real war starts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53.  It was listed in game under its original &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; name on the PS3 version until a patch altered it to G53 as used in the PC and X360 versions. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customization screen.  This is a pre-patch screnshot from the PS3 version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RussianguywithACR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A Russian Engineer fires his &amp;quot;ACW-R,&amp;quot; note the full length barrel]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steyr AUGA3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay trailer shows the AUG in the killfeed, and it can be seen in at least one screenshot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1.Steyr AUG A3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr AUGA3 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3wallpaper.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The soldier in the foreground can be seen holding an AUGA3 (Note the tri-railed handguard and the placement of the charging handle) fitted with an EOTech 552 and KAC foregrip]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MTAR-21 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Within the trailer &amp;quot;Donya Fortress&amp;quot; Viewers can see the player shooting an MTAR-21.&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled-1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MKEK JNG-90 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Within numerous shots of the Battlefield 3's Close Quarters: Donya Fortress Trailer, the film shows the player getting kills with the [[MKEK JNG-90]] at 44 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JNG-90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MKEK JNG-90 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]]. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pansarskott m/86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pansarskott m/86, a Swedish version of the [[M136 AT4]] with a folding front grip, appears in the hands of US Marines. The m/86 only appears in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pskott86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Pansarskott m/86, Swedish Army version of the M136 AT4 with folding foregrip - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies a Pansarskott m/86 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries a Pansarskott m/86 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player wields the MK 153 SMAW as he prepares to dish out some disproportionate retribution on some tumbleweeds for giving him allergies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player ponders the idea of putting AT mines inside a tire and rolling them toward a tank. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspicuously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet. The A-10 is not playable during campaign mode, but can be piloted in certain multiplayer maps, wherein the A-10's GAU-8/A is devastating against soft targets caught in the open.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8/A during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal imaging.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation. It should be noted that the game's campaign mode incorrectly shows the Hornets' M61 (and all other weapons, for that matter) as being operated by the back-seater, when in reality the gun is operated by the pilot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562191</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=562191"/>
		<updated>2012-05-13T14:57:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* M15 Anti-Tank mine */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same category, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own category at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM#Makarov PB|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has separate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance. The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP5K ==&lt;br /&gt;
At about 44 seconds in the Close Quarters: Donya Fortress trailer, the following soldier is killed by penetration and dropping a MP5k&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD/Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in ''[[Battlefield 2]]''; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to ''Battlefield 2''. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD/Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds. The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet and doesn't actually show up on the gun. In fact, the only thing the suppressor does is take up an attachment slot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 10+1 (originally 8+1, following the maximum factory capacity, changed after the 4th update).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franchi SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] is one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  It will fire in the pump-action fire-mode.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SPAS12.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Franchi SPAS-12  - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS122.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SPAS-12 in the first person view]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four capital letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs. Interesting note about the way the player character reloads the AN-94, he flicks the magazine out with another magazine, the same applies to the AEK-971.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.  The March 2012 update added the option of using extended 30-round box magazines (the largest box mag available for the VSS/AS Val/SR-3 rifles) instead of the standard 20-rounders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal Weaponlight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabeled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1.  While the correct capacity can be obtained using the &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot; attachment, this option is no longer available for the PS3 (As of the March 27th, 2012 update), and the X360 (As of the rent-a-server patch) versions, with the Heavy Barrel attachment taking its place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customization menu.  Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch in December of 2011 removed the burst mode for PC, and as of the March 2012 patch, the Xbox 360 version's M416 has it removed as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22. The pilot of the Antonov is a big fan of ''[[Top Gun]]'' and is getting as much low-altitude fly-by practice in as he can before the real war starts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53.  It was listed in game under its original &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; name on the PS3 version until a patch altered it to G53 as used in the PC and X360 versions. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customization screen.  This is a pre-patch screnshot from the PS3 version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RussianguywithACR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A Russian Engineer fires his &amp;quot;ACW-R,&amp;quot; note the full length barrel]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steyr AUGA3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay trailer shows the AUG in the killfeed, and it can be seen in at least one screenshot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1.Steyr AUG A3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr AUGA3 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3wallpaper.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The soldier in the foreground can be seen holding an AUGA3 (Note the tri-railed handguard and the placement of the charging handle) fitted with an EOTech 552 and KAC foregrip]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MTAR-21 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Within the trailer &amp;quot;Donya Fortress&amp;quot; Viewers can see the player shooting an MTAR-21.&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled-1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MKEK JNG-90 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Within numerous shots of the Battlefield 3's Close Quarters: Donya Fortress Trailer, the film shows the player getting kills with the [[MKEK JNG-90]] at 44 seconds&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s444/CorpsmanHusky/Untitled.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JNG-90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MKEK JNG-90 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]]. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pansarskott m/86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pansarskott m/86, a Swedish version of the [[M136 AT4]] with a folding front grip, appears in the hands of US Marines. The m/86 only appears in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pskott86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Pansarskott m/86, Swedish Army version of the M136 AT4 with folding foregrip - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies a Pansarskott m/86 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries a Pansarskott m/86 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player wields the MK 153 SMAW as he prepares to dish out some disproportionate retribution on some tumbleweeds for giving him allergies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player ponders the idea of putting AT mines inside a tire and rolling them toward a tank. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspicuously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet. The A-10 is not playable during campaign mode, but can be piloted in certain multiplayer maps, wherein the A-10's GAU-8/A is devastating against soft targets caught in the open.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8/A during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal imaging.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation. It should be noted that the game's campaign mode incorrectly shows the Hornets' M61 (and all other weapons, for that matter) as being operated by the back-seater, when in reality the gun is operated by the pilot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty:_Black_Ops_II&amp;diff=559347</id>
		<title>Talk:Call of Duty: Black Ops II</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty:_Black_Ops_II&amp;diff=559347"/>
		<updated>2012-05-08T03:14:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Wow... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''MAIN PAGE CONTENT NOTE: Only ''officially released'' images will be permitted. Leaked images, even if publicised elsewhere, are not permitted. This rule is not negotiable.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''TALK PAGE CONTENT NOTE: Do not post lists of weapons you hope to see in the game. They will be deleted.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Newest Joke? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Why put up a IMFDB page of this game when it looks clearly like a waste of money&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because I am loking forward to this game, and cheevo hunting. Besides I am the only biotic organism that plays CoD for the SP and not the multi (well, except for split-screening with my girlfriend). Anyways, I like Call of Duty, and I think this will be cool, and I cannot wait to see what new weapons they will have. - [[User:1morey]] May 6, 2012 8:58 AM (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== XM8? ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070805.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapon in the pic looks like a modified XM8 [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 15:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like the hybrid ACR from RE6 --[[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 15:31, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks to just be like a space gun... It &amp;quot;resembles&amp;quot; a XM8 and an ACR, but looks like the SCAR from Crysis. It's just a future weapon. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:40, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be more specific,it appears to be the Malaysian variant of the XM8,the Malaysian variant has no built in scope like on the ones designed for the U.S Army,but a rail instead.however it has extra features of weapons such as the ACR, which Treyarch probably to give their own artistic touch to make it look unique and futuristic.[[User:Ziess|Ziess]] 22:41, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Future Warfare ==&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070805.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-074340.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070746.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-065949.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game is set in near future, rumours say it's in 2027. [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 15:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what we've been needing. More future crap. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call Of Recon: Ghost Ops --[[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 15:35, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I've given up on the series now that being on top of five grenades when they go off doesn't kill people.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:03, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Givern how CoD does with real weapons, watching them making up weapons should be eight kinds of hilarious. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 22:10, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
its been confirmed to be set in the year 2025,i would imagine a mixture of real weapons,and Treyarch-created mashups will be included[[User:Ziess|Ziess]] 22:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as we get (have) to shoot hundreds of rounds full auto at each quadrupedal robot it will apparently be awesome. I hope bullets have no effect on enemies until they suddenly die also. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know, as long as the robots acknowledge being hit, a linebreaker enemy that stops you getting bogged down in one place can be good. ''Resistance: Fall of Man'' had enemies which would use their superior hitpoints (3+ headshots on normal for grunts with the basic rifles) to advance under fire while firing from the hip, which meant they ''didn't'' have to spam grenades at you constantly to stop you staying in one place (also they had Steelheads with guns that shot through walls to help them with that). It actually made the firefights rather more interesting than the headshot = dead standard. Though they at least reacted to being shot (flinched but kept running), it wasn't like ''STALKER'' where enemies were either alive or dead and wouldn't acknowledge any state in between (which in ''Clear Sky'' where they jacked up Bloodsucker HP ridiculously meant you weren't actually sure you were even hurting them).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In general enemy variety is a huge weakness for modern shooters, since almost everything is 'man with gun.' If they do this ''right'' it could actually have far more varied firefights. Or they'll just have it invincible until you find the glowing rocket launcher Private Dies In An Inconvenient Place dropped, which seems more likely all things considered. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 14:04, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Dual wielding Javelins. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Come On ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is NOTHING warranting a page for this yet.  All of you fanboys need to drop your cocks and have a little patience.  Would any IMFDB mods put up with this for any other page or project with the same amount of leaked content, being 1, maybe 2 usable pictures?  No way; this whole thing strikes me as ridiculous.  If there's nothing concrete worth putting on the main page, stick to the Treyarch forums.  It's insane how quickly the COD community jumped onto it on IMFDB.  It's fucking preposterous to discuss ONE PICTURE for a WHOLE GAME THAT HASN'T EVEN BEEN OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED YET.  Please, fanboys, calm down, and don't get ahead of yourselves.  --[[User:ZeoRanger5|ZeoRanger5]] 16:38, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally someone who agrees with me. --[[User:Mr.Ice|Mr.Ice]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't disagree [[User:Bristow8411|Bristow8411]] 17:18, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game has been officially announced, there are several pictures on CallofDuty.com --[[User:Pistolpete|Pistolpete]] 17:47, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plus, a trailer is coming out today [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:29, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trailer released, and I can already see inclusions in the form of the M249. --[[User:Jusuchin|Jusuchin]] 19:21, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trailer Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapon spots from the trailer that I found in the new trailer: at 0:30 there is a M134 Minigun (future-ized) mounted on a four legged combat drone, 0:43 there is a tank drone that appears to have a Metal Storm weapon mounted on its left (our right), 1:09 there is a future pistol (seems unrelated to any real world firearm), 1:11 there is a future-ized XM8, 1:18 there is an M16 (which model can't tell though length suggest it is a full length barrel and has 20 round magazine), 1:27 there what appears to be an M249 SAW (or M240), 1:31 there is a soldier with a balaclava firing a bullpup short barreled weapon that bears resemblance to the QBZ-95, at 1:31 or 1:32 (very easy to miss) there is a soldier being blown away holding an AK variant and by the looks of the handguard and flash hider it is an AN-94, at 1:34 in horseback solders are armed with WWII bolt action rifles, at 1:36 the technical is armed with a Dshk hmg, 1:44 hard to make out but rider on the right has an AK pattern weapon, likely an AK-47 since it looks like the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, 1:48 unknown shotgun. That's all I found for now. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 21:03, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have an intuition that the M16 might (and I have empathize this, ''might'') be an A1 variant or a faux XM16 judging solely from silhouette of the upper receiver. The SAW apparently has an Mk 48 Mod 1 styled heat shield and handguard but that doesn't really mean anything, considering how the franchise loves to mix and match different variants. Weapon at 1:32, on the other hand, is ''definitely'' an AN-94. At least in aesthetic terms.--[[User:BeloglaviSup|BeloglaviSup]] 01:03, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Isn't it &amp;quot;Kriss USA&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;TDI&amp;quot; now?[[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 08:04, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Possibly, but KRISS ALLCAPS TACTICOOL ARMS is a stupid title and they were TDI first. They only changed it because they've belatedly discovered the mil-spec subgun market is a ghost town if you're not an MP5 and they're only ever going to sell Vectors to mall ninjas. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 14:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Designated Arguing/Complaining Area==&lt;br /&gt;
Before this discussion page turns to chaos like all the other CoD talk pages, let's open up a designated complaint zone. I know many people want to offer their negative opinions about the game, so if you don't have any real discussion topics please post in subheadings here. Hopefully this will allow people who want to actually discuss the game rather than arguing or whining to avoid these comments and have an actual discussion.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 22:51, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is this going to be like===&lt;br /&gt;
I have looked at the trailer several times. This is how I think the games success is going to be. A: It will be a huge hit and sell millions of copies like all other COD games or B: It is going to be a complete and total disaster and there will never be another COD game made again in our lifetimes. I find from what I learned from the plot line details that has been released that it is going to feature what the first Black Ops did, except that the flashbacks will be set in the 1980's and the present 2025. I am wondering how Treyarch is going to do that. This will be a very curious COD game that I will be wondering about UNTIL it comes out.--[[User:Coltmth|Coltmth]] 21:58, 4 May 2012 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wow...===&lt;br /&gt;
I'll start off by saying the obvious- this game looks stupid. I mean, why jump from the 60's to the 2020's? I could see the futuristic idea that they were trying for, but this looks like a Ghost Recon rip-off. I have just lost what little respect I had for Treyarch. As more details become availiable, I might change my mind, but first impressions are not good. As with any game, if it is fun I will play it.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 22:51, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've lost respect for the Call of Duty franchise after Infinity Ward broke up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:35, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After at least one failed Soviet aggression in the late 60s, failed invasion of the Eastcoast US, ''failed'' (third time's the charm, right?) invasion of continental Europe within the last three games alone, you'd think the US at least would just get used to getting attacked on a major scale by this point.--[[User:BeloglaviSup|BeloglaviSup]] 01:09, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well they have, it's pretty clear from MW2 that Russia tries to nuke the US so often in this universe that they didn't even bother with a counter-launch since that would just encourage them. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:11, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't believe how generic they managed to make their new take on the series. Evil robots, mechs on four legs and choppers with unnecesserly many features. It's basically the same as every futuristic game. On top of it the game looks awful, name doesn't make sense, it looks more over-the-top than MW3. Could Treyarch have mistaken May 1 for April 1? This either is a joke, or will become one.--[[User:Z008MJ|Z008MJ]] 05:46, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the hell were Treyarch thinking? I was seriously hoping too see what happened to Hudson, Weaver and Mason in Operation Charybdis and maybe if we would get to see how Price started his career. It is often better to go back to basics than too go forward complications. [[User:Fixer|Fixer]]&lt;br /&gt;
:What made you so sure that Price was going to be in this game?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 08:45, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Modern Warfare is set in a different continuity, and they even wanted to spin it off into an entirely separate franchise. The Call of Duty label was stuck on by Activision as a way of marketing it. Price won't be appearing because he doesn't exist. [[User:Chitoryu12|Chitoryu12]] 22:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From what I've read on CoD wiki and heard, 1/3 of the game will take place in the 80s and the rest in 2025--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 09:51, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: @ The Wierd It - the 'intel' at the ending of the final story mission of Black Ops suggest that Mason is being hunted by an SAS team in South Africa lead by a young operative called 'Jonathan' which many people have taken to mean a very young Captain Price [[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it's very unlikely that they'll have any crossovers between the WaW/BO and MW universes. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 10:47, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know that. I'm wondering where the leap in logic came that took people from one of the more common first names in the English language to &amp;quot;this is obviously meant to be Price&amp;quot;. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 15:36, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, it's positively rational compared to the kind of logical gymnastics that some rumour threads get. &amp;quot;I performed a series of random mathematical actions on this Valve press release and made the number 3! Episode 3 confirmed!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:59, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing I thought when I saw the trailer was that this game was CoD attempting to piggyback on the whole idea of Metal Gear Solid 4. Then I saw the horse sequences and realized I was actually watching an Uncharted 3 trailer. --[[User:K|K]] 19:51, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly like the way it's going now. I liked Black Ops better than Modern Warfare because it went to a setting not commonly covered (especially in big-budget titles) and had some more interesting segments than just running through an urban environment shooting dozens of AK-toting terrorists or Russians. I'm interested in seeing how Black Ops II progresses now that they're able to create their own technology (no worries of anachronisms or errors). It's a refreshing change of pace from generic World War II and modern day &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; shooters. [[User:Chitoryu12|Chitoryu12]] 22:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ The Wierd It - Ok mate, fair enough I might have jumped the gun. But on what we know from the intel in Black Ops and the character of Price in the MW franchise, (&amp;quot;promising SAS solider named Jonathan&amp;quot; also referred to as Price in the french Black Ops) - basing it on that knowledge, see why I jumped the gun? However, they brought Woods back for this one, when we were all sure he was dead, what's too say a very young Price won't be featuring in this game? [[User:Fixer|Fixer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I still love COD4, great game, but now I refuse to play anything after it. I did play through MW3's story to see the ending, and the MW series' ''story'' is pretty good, but the 2 and 3's gameplay is soooooo bad. In every single mission except one, you start with a reflex sight on your gun in MW3. The other mission you have a pistol. I'm gonna follow this page just to see how bad they can make it. I find it really funny how Halo and Mass Effect have guns (and tech) that are more realistic than MW2/BO/MW3/BO2. Hell, not just more realistic, Halo and ME's weapons ''actually make sense''. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:23, 4 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like the US got some help from the Combine with those 4 propeller gunships they have. Maybe we might see an AR1 or a Strider? :D [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:12, 7 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===My two cents on the matter===&lt;br /&gt;
Ok... well, first off, I'll admit that I am a fan of CoD. But from the first glance of this trailer, I think that Activision needs it's old management back, and fire the current management along with Robert Kotick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously Robert? This is what Black Ops II is going to be? A pseudo-futuristic first person shooter with player-driven choices thrown into the mix? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was expecting that the next Call of Duty was going to be the inevitable Black Ops II (and if not that, then maybe something different for a change like making the game about a war that many people have forgotten about, like World War I or the Korean War, cause World War II and Vietnam get WAY too much attention). but I was expecting it to dive into details about Black Ops operations in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s when the United States got involved in conflicts during those years AFTER the Vietnam war (a.k.a., Grenada, Panama, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Gulf War I, Bosnian conflicts, etc.). But really, THIS is the best idea that your workers came up with? Some cyberwar between China and the United States?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, from what I've read, there will be some throwbacks to the 1980s in this game, but adding in player-driven choices which affect the outcome of the game is a bad idea. I play Call of Duty for mindless entertainment and for shooting things, not to play over and over for making different moral decisions every time to get all the endings of the game! If I wanted a first person shooter with that theme, I'd go play Fallout 3. (Speaking of which, do you think we're really that stupid to notice that you guys stole &amp;quot;The Vault&amp;quot; name?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the weapons... you guys do realize that MANY of these weapons are either still on the drawing board, in the prototype stages, canceled (*cough* XM8 *cough*), or being tested in LIMITED numbers, and that we might not be seeing ANY of them in any future war by the year 2025... right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it isn't even an xm8, i don't know how it could be a wrong choice for a gun if the gun itself isn't actually a real concept of any kind, its just a futuristic-looking gun designed by treyarch, and what would firing bobby kotick actually do it wouldn't change any of the games because he doesn't make any desicions regarding them, he worries about the money side e.g. the budget, the advertisement.&lt;br /&gt;
also the creators of fallout didn't actually invent the word vault so i don't really know what the pointless rant was for.--[[User:Pistolpete|Pistolpete]] 02:48, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well... maybe I might give this game a chance when it comes out. But seriously, if this is what all future Call of Duty games are going to follow from this point onward, then I will stick with the older ones instead. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 22:20, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, thanks to the video game industry, one would think that there may be a chance that the project will get cancelled like many games before it... unfortunately since the Call Of Duty franchise pops out games like a mother rabbit the future seems bleak...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mikethepanda|Mikethepanda]] 01:44, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A1? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://k36.kn3.net/F376E2FE4.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
also the futuristic M4: http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120502191412/callofduty/images/5/53/20120502-084241.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 'futuristic' M4 in the link above appears to be based upon the GR4 G26 airsoft rifle manufactured by Guay &amp;amp; Guay. Shown here for comparison: http://www.titano-shopping.com/immagini/Prodotti/Big/GR4_G26_DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it looks like that... It's not the first time CoD takes from airosft the looks for the guns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't be surprised if they just used that futuristic looking gun for the photoshoot for the poster and it doesn't appear at all in the game itself.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:32, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All those links are broken. Also I saw the recent trailer and the sillohuotte images of the M16 does look like an A1 from the handguard but the pop up trailer on gametrailers.com called it a classic M4 [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:51, 4 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Classic? It was an M4 before there were any M4s. That's a hipster M4 if there ever was one... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:43, 5 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rename ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the page be renamed to &amp;quot;Call of Duty: Black Ops II&amp;quot;. With the Roman numerals, because that's what all official material lists it as. - [[User:1morey]] May 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Naw, since that would put it out of order when they inevitably make Black Ops 3. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:08, 6 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A note could be made in the first paragraph though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:36, 7 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty:_Black_Ops_II&amp;diff=559346</id>
		<title>Talk:Call of Duty: Black Ops II</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Call_of_Duty:_Black_Ops_II&amp;diff=559346"/>
		<updated>2012-05-08T03:12:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Wow... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''MAIN PAGE CONTENT NOTE: Only ''officially released'' images will be permitted. Leaked images, even if publicised elsewhere, are not permitted. This rule is not negotiable.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''TALK PAGE CONTENT NOTE: Do not post lists of weapons you hope to see in the game. They will be deleted.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Newest Joke? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Why put up a IMFDB page of this game when it looks clearly like a waste of money&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because I am loking forward to this game, and cheevo hunting. Besides I am the only biotic organism that plays CoD for the SP and not the multi (well, except for split-screening with my girlfriend). Anyways, I like Call of Duty, and I think this will be cool, and I cannot wait to see what new weapons they will have. - [[User:1morey]] May 6, 2012 8:58 AM (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== XM8? ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070805.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapon in the pic looks like a modified XM8 [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 15:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like the hybrid ACR from RE6 --[[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 15:31, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks to just be like a space gun... It &amp;quot;resembles&amp;quot; a XM8 and an ACR, but looks like the SCAR from Crysis. It's just a future weapon. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:40, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be more specific,it appears to be the Malaysian variant of the XM8,the Malaysian variant has no built in scope like on the ones designed for the U.S Army,but a rail instead.however it has extra features of weapons such as the ACR, which Treyarch probably to give their own artistic touch to make it look unique and futuristic.[[User:Ziess|Ziess]] 22:41, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Future Warfare ==&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070805.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-074340.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-070746.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.charlieintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/20120501-065949.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game is set in near future, rumours say it's in 2027. [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 15:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what we've been needing. More future crap. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call Of Recon: Ghost Ops --[[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 15:35, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I've given up on the series now that being on top of five grenades when they go off doesn't kill people.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:03, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Givern how CoD does with real weapons, watching them making up weapons should be eight kinds of hilarious. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 22:10, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
its been confirmed to be set in the year 2025,i would imagine a mixture of real weapons,and Treyarch-created mashups will be included[[User:Ziess|Ziess]] 22:28, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as we get (have) to shoot hundreds of rounds full auto at each quadrupedal robot it will apparently be awesome. I hope bullets have no effect on enemies until they suddenly die also. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know, as long as the robots acknowledge being hit, a linebreaker enemy that stops you getting bogged down in one place can be good. ''Resistance: Fall of Man'' had enemies which would use their superior hitpoints (3+ headshots on normal for grunts with the basic rifles) to advance under fire while firing from the hip, which meant they ''didn't'' have to spam grenades at you constantly to stop you staying in one place (also they had Steelheads with guns that shot through walls to help them with that). It actually made the firefights rather more interesting than the headshot = dead standard. Though they at least reacted to being shot (flinched but kept running), it wasn't like ''STALKER'' where enemies were either alive or dead and wouldn't acknowledge any state in between (which in ''Clear Sky'' where they jacked up Bloodsucker HP ridiculously meant you weren't actually sure you were even hurting them).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In general enemy variety is a huge weakness for modern shooters, since almost everything is 'man with gun.' If they do this ''right'' it could actually have far more varied firefights. Or they'll just have it invincible until you find the glowing rocket launcher Private Dies In An Inconvenient Place dropped, which seems more likely all things considered. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 14:04, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Dual wielding Javelins. ~ACE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Come On ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is NOTHING warranting a page for this yet.  All of you fanboys need to drop your cocks and have a little patience.  Would any IMFDB mods put up with this for any other page or project with the same amount of leaked content, being 1, maybe 2 usable pictures?  No way; this whole thing strikes me as ridiculous.  If there's nothing concrete worth putting on the main page, stick to the Treyarch forums.  It's insane how quickly the COD community jumped onto it on IMFDB.  It's fucking preposterous to discuss ONE PICTURE for a WHOLE GAME THAT HASN'T EVEN BEEN OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED YET.  Please, fanboys, calm down, and don't get ahead of yourselves.  --[[User:ZeoRanger5|ZeoRanger5]] 16:38, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally someone who agrees with me. --[[User:Mr.Ice|Mr.Ice]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't disagree [[User:Bristow8411|Bristow8411]] 17:18, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game has been officially announced, there are several pictures on CallofDuty.com --[[User:Pistolpete|Pistolpete]] 17:47, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plus, a trailer is coming out today [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:29, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trailer released, and I can already see inclusions in the form of the M249. --[[User:Jusuchin|Jusuchin]] 19:21, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trailer Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weapon spots from the trailer that I found in the new trailer: at 0:30 there is a M134 Minigun (future-ized) mounted on a four legged combat drone, 0:43 there is a tank drone that appears to have a Metal Storm weapon mounted on its left (our right), 1:09 there is a future pistol (seems unrelated to any real world firearm), 1:11 there is a future-ized XM8, 1:18 there is an M16 (which model can't tell though length suggest it is a full length barrel and has 20 round magazine), 1:27 there what appears to be an M249 SAW (or M240), 1:31 there is a soldier with a balaclava firing a bullpup short barreled weapon that bears resemblance to the QBZ-95, at 1:31 or 1:32 (very easy to miss) there is a soldier being blown away holding an AK variant and by the looks of the handguard and flash hider it is an AN-94, at 1:34 in horseback solders are armed with WWII bolt action rifles, at 1:36 the technical is armed with a Dshk hmg, 1:44 hard to make out but rider on the right has an AK pattern weapon, likely an AK-47 since it looks like the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, 1:48 unknown shotgun. That's all I found for now. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 21:03, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have an intuition that the M16 might (and I have empathize this, ''might'') be an A1 variant or a faux XM16 judging solely from silhouette of the upper receiver. The SAW apparently has an Mk 48 Mod 1 styled heat shield and handguard but that doesn't really mean anything, considering how the franchise loves to mix and match different variants. Weapon at 1:32, on the other hand, is ''definitely'' an AN-94. At least in aesthetic terms.--[[User:BeloglaviSup|BeloglaviSup]] 01:03, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Isn't it &amp;quot;Kriss USA&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;TDI&amp;quot; now?[[User:Temp89|Temp89]] 08:04, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Possibly, but KRISS ALLCAPS TACTICOOL ARMS is a stupid title and they were TDI first. They only changed it because they've belatedly discovered the mil-spec subgun market is a ghost town if you're not an MP5 and they're only ever going to sell Vectors to mall ninjas. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 14:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Designated Arguing/Complaining Area==&lt;br /&gt;
Before this discussion page turns to chaos like all the other CoD talk pages, let's open up a designated complaint zone. I know many people want to offer their negative opinions about the game, so if you don't have any real discussion topics please post in subheadings here. Hopefully this will allow people who want to actually discuss the game rather than arguing or whining to avoid these comments and have an actual discussion.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 22:51, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is this going to be like===&lt;br /&gt;
I have looked at the trailer several times. This is how I think the games success is going to be. A: It will be a huge hit and sell millions of copies like all other COD games or B: It is going to be a complete and total disaster and there will never be another COD game made again in our lifetimes. I find from what I learned from the plot line details that has been released that it is going to feature what the first Black Ops did, except that the flashbacks will be set in the 1980's and the present 2025. I am wondering how Treyarch is going to do that. This will be a very curious COD game that I will be wondering about UNTIL it comes out.--[[User:Coltmth|Coltmth]] 21:58, 4 May 2012 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wow...===&lt;br /&gt;
I'll start off by saying the obvious- this game looks stupid. I mean, why jump from the 60's to the 2020's? I could see the futuristic idea that they were trying for, but this looks like a Ghost Recon rip-off. I have just lost what little respect I had for Treyarch. As more details become availiable, I might change my mind, but first impressions are not good. As with any game, if it is fun I will play it.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 22:51, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've lost respect for the Call of Duty franchise after Infinity Ward broke up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:35, 1 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After at least one failed Soviet aggression in the late 60s, failed invasion of the Eastcoast US, ''failed'' (third time's the charm, right?) invasion of continental Europe within the last three games alone, you'd think the US at least would just get used to getting attacked on a major scale by this point.--[[User:BeloglaviSup|BeloglaviSup]] 01:09, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well they have, it's pretty clear from MW2 that Russia tries to nuke the US so often in this universe that they didn't even bother with a counter-launch since that would just encourage them. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:11, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't believe how generic they managed to make their new take on the series. Evil robots, mechs on four legs and choppers with unnecesserly many features. It's basically the same as every futuristic game. On top of it the game looks awful, name doesn't make sense, it looks more over-the-top than MW3. Could Treyarch have mistaken May 1 for April 1? This either is a joke, or will become one.--[[User:Z008MJ|Z008MJ]] 05:46, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the hell were Treyarch thinking? I was seriously hoping too see what happened to Hudson, Weaver and Mason in Operation Charybdis and maybe if we would get to see how Price started his career. It is often better to go back to basics than too go forward complications. [[User:Fixer|Fixer]]&lt;br /&gt;
:What made you so sure that Price was going to be in this game?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 08:45, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Modern Warfare is set in a different continuity, and they even wanted to spin it off into an entirely separate franchise. The Call of Duty label was stuck on by Activision as a way of marketing it. Price won't be appearing because he doesn't exist. [[User:Chitoryu12|Chitoryu12]] 22:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:From what I've read on CoD wiki and heard, 1/3 of the game will take place in the 80s and the rest in 2025--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 09:51, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: @ The Wierd It - the 'intel' at the ending of the final story mission of Black Ops suggest that Mason is being hunted by an SAS team in South Africa lead by a young operative called 'Jonathan' which many people have taken to mean a very young Captain Price [[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it's very unlikely that they'll have any crossovers between the WaW/BO and MW universes. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 10:47, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know that. I'm wondering where the leap in logic came that took people from one of the more common first names in the English language to &amp;quot;this is obviously meant to be Price&amp;quot;. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 15:36, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, it's positively rational compared to the kind of logical gymnastics that some rumour threads get. &amp;quot;I performed a series of random mathematical actions on this Valve press release and made the number 3! Episode 3 confirmed!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:59, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing I thought when I saw the trailer was that this game was CoD attempting to piggyback on the whole idea of Metal Gear Solid 4. Then I saw the horse sequences and realized I was actually watching an Uncharted 3 trailer. --[[User:K|K]] 19:51, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly like the way it's going now. I liked Black Ops better than Modern Warfare because it went to a setting not commonly covered (especially in big-budget titles) and had some more interesting segments than just running through an urban environment shooting dozens of AK-toting terrorists or Russians. I'm interested in seeing how Black Ops II progresses now that they're able to create their own technology (no worries of anachronisms or errors). It's a refreshing change of pace from generic World War II and modern day &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; shooters. [[User:Chitoryu12|Chitoryu12]] 22:22, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ The Wierd It - Ok mate, fair enough I might have jumped the gun. But on what we know from the intel in Black Ops and the character of Price in the MW franchise, (&amp;quot;promising SAS solider named Jonathan&amp;quot; also referred to as Price in the french Black Ops) - basing it on that knowledge, see why I jumped the gun? However, they brought Woods back for this one, when we were all sure he was dead, what's too say a very young Price won't be featuring in this game? [[User:Fixer|Fixer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I still love COD4, great game, but now I refuse to play anything after it. I did play through MW3's story to see the ending, and the MW series' ''story'' is pretty good, but the 2 and 3's gameplay is soooooo bad. In every single mission except one, you start with a reflex sight on your gun in MW3. The other mission you have a pistol. I'm gonna follow this page just to see how bad they can make it. I find it really funny how Halo and Mass Effect have guns (and tech) that are more realistic than MW2/BO/MW3/BO2. Hell, not just more realistic, Halo and ME's weapons ''actually make sense''. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:23, 4 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It looks like the US got some help from the Combine with those 4 propeller gunships they have. Maybe we might see an AR1 or a Strider? :D [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:12, 7 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===My two cents on the matter===&lt;br /&gt;
Ok... well, first off, I'll admit that I am a fan of CoD. But from the first glance of this trailer, I think that Activision needs it's old management back, and fire the current management along with Robert Kotick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously Robert? This is what Black Ops II is going to be? A pseudo-futuristic first person shooter with player-driven choices thrown into the mix? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was expecting that the next Call of Duty was going to be the inevitable Black Ops II (and if not that, then maybe something different for a change like making the game about a war that many people have forgotten about, like World War I or the Korean War, cause World War II and Vietnam get WAY too much attention). but I was expecting it to dive into details about Black Ops operations in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s when the United States got involved in conflicts during those years AFTER the Vietnam war (a.k.a., Grenada, Panama, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Gulf War I, Bosnian conflicts, etc.). But really, THIS is the best idea that your workers came up with? Some cyberwar between China and the United States?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, from what I've read, there will be some throwbacks to the 1980s in this game, but adding in player-driven choices which affect the outcome of the game is a bad idea. I play Call of Duty for mindless entertainment and for shooting things, not to play over and over for making different moral decisions every time to get all the endings of the game! If I wanted a first person shooter with that theme, I'd go play Fallout 3. (Speaking of which, do you think we're really that stupid to notice that you guys stole &amp;quot;The Vault&amp;quot; name?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the weapons... you guys do realize that MANY of these weapons are either still on the drawing board, in the prototype stages, canceled (*cough* XM8 *cough*), or being tested in LIMITED numbers, and that we might not be seeing ANY of them in any future war by the year 2025... right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it isn't even an xm8, i don't know how it could be a wrong choice for a gun if the gun itself isn't actually a real concept of any kind, its just a futuristic-looking gun designed by treyarch, and what would firing bobby kotick actually do it wouldn't change any of the games because he doesn't make any desicions regarding them, he worries about the money side e.g. the budget, the advertisement.&lt;br /&gt;
also the creators of fallout didn't actually invent the word vault so i don't really know what the pointless rant was for.--[[User:Pistolpete|Pistolpete]] 02:48, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well... maybe I might give this game a chance when it comes out. But seriously, if this is what all future Call of Duty games are going to follow from this point onward, then I will stick with the older ones instead. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 22:20, 2 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, thanks to the video game industry, one would think that there may be a chance that the project will get cancelled like many games before it... unfortunately since the Call Of Duty franchise pops out games like a mother rabbit the future seems bleak...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mikethepanda|Mikethepanda]] 01:44, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A1? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://k36.kn3.net/F376E2FE4.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
also the futuristic M4: http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120502191412/callofduty/images/5/53/20120502-084241.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 'futuristic' M4 in the link above appears to be based upon the GR4 G26 airsoft rifle manufactured by Guay &amp;amp; Guay. Shown here for comparison: http://www.titano-shopping.com/immagini/Prodotti/Big/GR4_G26_DST&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it looks like that... It's not the first time CoD takes from airosft the looks for the guns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't be surprised if they just used that futuristic looking gun for the photoshoot for the poster and it doesn't appear at all in the game itself.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:32, 3 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All those links are broken. Also I saw the recent trailer and the sillohuotte images of the M16 does look like an A1 from the handguard but the pop up trailer on gametrailers.com called it a classic M4 [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:51, 4 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Classic? It was an M4 before there were any M4s. That's a hipster M4 if there ever was one... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:43, 5 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rename ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the page be renamed to &amp;quot;Call of Duty: Black Ops II&amp;quot;. With the Roman numerals, because that's what all official material lists it as. - [[User:1morey]] May 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Naw, since that would put it out of order when they inevitably make Black Ops 3. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:08, 6 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A note could be made in the first paragraph though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:36, 7 May 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=545633</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=545633"/>
		<updated>2012-04-12T02:16:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Flash Suppresor */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Javelin dogtag looks so cool. I can't wait to get to 500 kills with it. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:16, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=545631</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=545631"/>
		<updated>2012-04-12T02:13:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* 3 Expansions planned for BF3 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More funny stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsbTjPe2fs&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More ordinary stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUpUFwV8fM8&amp;amp;hd=1 --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When was the screenshot that says &amp;quot;HK53&amp;quot; taken?  Shouldn't that be updated with a more recent one that says &amp;quot;G53&amp;quot;? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 19:46, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know of any new info on the weapons in the expansion? I still have no idea of what the 2nd recon weapon is (Is recon even getting 2 weapons?). Now I'm hearing the TAR is going to be all-kit? I'm clearly confused. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 21:13, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The standard Arctic Warfare is chambered in either .243 Winchester or 7.62x51mm NATO. However, the in game gun is modelled on a magnum rifle (can tell by the size of the magazine) which is chambered in .300 Winchester of .338 Lapua. The caliber is correct for the name of the gun, but wrong for the model it actually is. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:00, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep in mind most of the calibres are wrong for the Back To Karkand guns, like the QBs being 5.45mm [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:40, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortcuts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was on the 360 Marketplace this week, looking for new Add-ons for any of my games when I came across several for Battlefield 3. They are class specific and cost 560 Microsoft points apiece or you can get the ultimate bundle which includes Air, Ground and Co-Op 'shortcuts' for a whopping 3200 points. What a shortcut entails is basically a free pass to getting ALL of the specific kits weapons, attachments and gadgets thereby bypassing the experience system if someone has the credits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, this is a noob's wetdream. Personally, I think they should rename the Ultimate Shortcut Bundle to the Ultimate Lazy Bastards Bundle. Thankfully all of the shortcuts have been getting pretty low reviews. Thoughts? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 16:28, 3 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, it includes weapon attachments? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:24, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every other game is dumbed down for casual gamers to blow through in an hour. Why is this any different? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:51, 4 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Shortcuts are gay. 'nuff said. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 17:21, 5 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not too happy about shortcuts either, but did you really have to use gay as a way to insult it? [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I forgot gay means &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot; --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:27, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 = Pump-Action? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching the part of the Close-Quarters Expansion Pack trailer where it showed the SPAS-12, and it looked like it was operating in pump-action mode.  Is anyone else disappointed by this?  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm actually quite glad, I was quite disappointed with the lack of pump-action shotguns in game. I guess they could say it's an SAS-12 so it's a pump-action only variant in real life. [[User:Recon42|Recon42]] 10:04, 8 April 2012 (CDT) Recon42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't really care, I want more pump actions, but another tube fed semi action shotty too.  --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 11:40, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here, it's not technically wrong, and since we need at least one more pump shotgun, I'm fine with it. I also think they went with the SPAS-12 because most pump shotguns like 870s, Mossbergs, Ithicas, etc, looks very similar. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 8 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but they could have done the Tactical version of the Benelli Nova or SuperNova.  They look unique enough.  Or they could have done the Kel-Tec KSG, except without continuous fire of its two magazines (I'm looking at you, MW3).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with a pump shotgun with 12 shots (*EDITED* the Kel-tec KSG)? The street sweeper (DAO-12) has 12 shots AND is semi-auto, then there's the USAS-12 with 10+1 and FULL-auto, a pump action with 12 or 12+1 capicity wounldn't be much of a big deal. - Wantabe_Warrior38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You think the SPAS-12 has 12 shots?  It only has an 8-round magazine.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]]  8:57 7 April 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pretty sure he meant the KSG. And yeah, the SuperNova looks pretty sweet, I like the trigger guard :) EDIT: Are there any pump-action mag-fed shotguns? I can't think of any, but that'd be pretty cool, like the M1014 and Saiga-12K. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:30, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are conversion kits to convert popular pump guns to magazine fed, but they look odd with the magazine being further forward than normal, under the existing magazine tube. There are pump actions that are made with box magazines like the [[Valtro PM5 Shotgun]] series, or the [[Hawk shotgun series]]. There is also the [[Franchi SPAS-15]] which is semi/pump like the SPAS-12. I have also seen Saigas that have been converted to pump action. These are just off the top of my head, there are probably other, more obscure weapons out there.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:47, 9 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 Magazine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it using the 20 round stanag magazine? Looks like it. If it is, ill mention it on the kh2002 portion of the page&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK Mag ==&lt;br /&gt;
So, it seems someone screwed up during the development of the patch and now the RPK has an extended mag option that gives it 199+1 rounds :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:31, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it was a DICE only attachment pre-patch --[[User:CommanderLukas|CommanderLukas]] 20:02, 11 April 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Fast_Five&amp;diff=545136</id>
		<title>Fast Five</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Fast_Five&amp;diff=545136"/>
		<updated>2012-04-11T04:37:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 10 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Fast5.jpg|thumb|right|300px|''Fast Five'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Fast Five''''' is the fifth installment in the ''[[The Fast and the Furious]]'' franchise.  Directed by Justin Lin (who also directed '''''[[The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift]]''''' and '''''[[Fast and Furious]]''''') the 2011 sequel follows Dominic Toretto ([[Vin Diesel]]) and Brian O'Connor ([[Paul Walker]]) and their crew who are on the run from a U.S federal agent ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) and a ruthless drug lord in Rio De Janeiro. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons were used in the film ''Fast Five'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Handguns=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SIG-Sauer P226R==&lt;br /&gt;
Brian O'Conner ([[Paul Walker]]) carries a [[SIG-Sauer P226R]] as his sidearm throughout the film, notably seen during the climax of the film. It is also seen on the promotional poster for the film. Agent Wilkes ([[Fernando Chien]]) also carries one as his sidearm, and he briefly pulls it during the convoy ambush scene. The rest of the DSS agent also seem to carry P226s in thigh holsters.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:P226R.jpg|thumb|none|300px|SIG-Sauer P226R - 9x19mm; updated P226 with accessory rails, now the standard production version for the P226 (IMFDB still refers to this model as the &amp;quot;P226R&amp;quot; to distinguish between newer and older models).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5SIG.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Fusco ([[Alimi Ballard]]) with a SIG in a thigh holster.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5P226-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Wilkes fires his SIG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5p226.jpg|thumb|none|600px|O'Conner fires the SIG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5p226-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|O'Conner holds the P226.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 629 Competitor Performance Center==&lt;br /&gt;
Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Agent Luke Hobbs ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) uses a [[Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 629|Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 629  &amp;quot;Competitor&amp;quot; Performance Center]] as his sidearm throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SW629PC.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 629 &amp;quot;Competitor&amp;quot; Performance Center with weighted barrel and scope rails - .44 Magnum. This model is a standard production from the S&amp;amp;W Performance Center. This is the original version of the gun, with Weaver rails. Subsequent versions uses Picatinny rails]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fast-five-dwayne-johnson-revolver.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A publicity still showing [[Dwayne Johnson]] with the Smith &amp;amp; Wesson revolver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5629.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Hobbs cocks his Smith.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-revolver-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Closeup of the S&amp;amp;W.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Taurus PT92C==&lt;br /&gt;
Brazilian Military Police (PMERJ) Officer Elena Neves ([[Elsa Pataky]]) uses a [[Taurus PT92#PT92C/PT92CS|Taurus PT92C]] with wooden grips as her sidearm. Toretto also briefly handles the Taurus when she visits Elsa's apartment. Most of the Brazilian police officers also keep [[Taurus PT92#PT92C/PT92CS|Taurus PT92Cs]] as their sidearms.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TaurusPT92C.gif‎|thumb|none|350px|Taurus PT92C with wood grips - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ElsaCapture.JPG|thumb|none|300px|Elena Neves holds a Taurus PT92C in a publicity still.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Taurus.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Neves holds her Taurus on Toretto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Taurus-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Neves holds the PT92C during the scene when Hobbes and Toretto confront each other.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Taurus-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Neves' Taurus rests on a table.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5TaurusToretto.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Toretto holds Neves' on Taurus in her apartment.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Taurus-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Brazilian police officer fires his Taurus at O'Conner's 2010 Dodge Charger.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Taurus PT92AF==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the favela gangsters is briefly seen holding a [[Taurus PT92]] when Hobbs ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) and his team enter the favelas.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus-PT92AF.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Taurus PT92AF (blued) - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5PT92-.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The gangster holds his Taurus (circled in red).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Jericho 941==&lt;br /&gt;
Gisele Harabo ([[Gal Gadot]]) is seen drawing a black [[Jericho 941]] when she is introduced in the film. Despite supposedly being ex-military, she holds her Jericho gangster-style at a 90° angle.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jer941Rail.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Jericho 941 (new manufacture with accessory rails) - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Jericho.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Gisele holds the Jerichi on Roman Pearce.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Jericho-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Gisele holds her Jericho, &amp;quot;gangsta style&amp;quot;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beretta 92FS Inox==&lt;br /&gt;
Zizi ([[Michael Irby]]) uses a [[Beretta 92FS Inox]] as his sidearm throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Beretta-Inox.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta 92FS Inox - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Inox.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi pulls the Beretta on Toretto on the train.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Inox-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi's Inox lies on the train floor.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Inox-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi holds his Beretta during the climax.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beretta 92FS==&lt;br /&gt;
Roman Pearce ([[Tyrese Gibson]]) uses a [[Beretta 92FS Inox]] fitted with a weaponlight on the dust cover during the safehouse robbery.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92FS.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta 92FS - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F592fs.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Pearce enters Reyes' safehouse with his Beretta (circled in red). ''If you look closely, you can make out the slide-mounted safety which confirms the gun as a Beretta.'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Glock 18C==&lt;br /&gt;
Vince ([[Matt Schulze]]) has a [[Glock#Glock 18|Glock 18C]] with an extended 33-round magazine and an accessory rail during the scene when Brian and Mia arrive in Rio. He tucks the gun into the back of his pants. The gun is never really seen clearly, so there is a possibility that it is merely a [[Glock 19]] with an extended magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. This model has compensator cuts on the slide and barrel to reduce muzzle climb while firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5G18.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vince holds his Glock.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Glock Variants==&lt;br /&gt;
The DEA Agents aboard the train all carry Glock variants, likely either [[Glock 17]]'s or [[Glock 19]]'s. However they are all killed by Zizi ([[Michael Irby]]) before they have a chance to fire them.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|3rd Generation Glock 17 - 9x19mm. Note the finger grooves, thumb reliefs, and accessory rail on the frame, which differentiate it from the older model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Glock19pistol.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 19 (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 10==&lt;br /&gt;
Diogo ([[Luis Da Silva Jr.]]) uses a gold plated [[Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 10]] during the confrontation between Hobbes and Toretto.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:S&amp;amp;WModel10Snub.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 10 snub nose revolver - .38 Special]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Model10.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Diogo holds his Model 10. Kind of odd that Diego is still helping out Toretto after he lost his 911 GT3 to him ina race, though this might just beto keep the cops away.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CZ 75==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the Brazilian thugs pulls a [[CZ 75]] on Hobbs and his team during Hobbs' and Toretto's confrontation.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cz75b9mm.jpg|thumb|none|350px|CZ 75B - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5CZ75.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the thugs holds his CZ 75. Note O'Conner's smug grin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Submachine Guns=&lt;br /&gt;
==FN P90==&lt;br /&gt;
Agent Chato ([[Yorgo Constantine]]) carries a [[FN P90]] with an EOTech sight as his primary firearm throughout the film. Vince ([[Matt Schulze]]) later uses the P90 to fight off Reyes' gunmen during the convoy ambush ambush, firing from the hip, no less.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FNP90wEOTECHsight.jpg‎ |thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR with EOTech red dot sight (this is a real movie 'blank adapted' firearm) - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Chato, in the middle, with his FN P90.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-group-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Chato holds his P90 on a favela gangster (on the right).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5P90-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbes holds Chato's P90 in their base.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5FNP90-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chato holds the P90 on Toretto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5P90-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chato runs with his P90 in hand.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5P90.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vince fires the P90 during the ambush.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5FNP90.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vince fire the submachine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP==&lt;br /&gt;
Agent Macroy ([[Geoff Meed]]) uses a [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP]] submachine gun with an EOTech sight as his primary firearm. He most notably wields it during the convoy ambush scene.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP-45 Ironman.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Macroy, on the left, holds his UMP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Vlcsnap-01232.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Macroy (second from the right) holds his UMP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5UMP.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Macroy fires his UMP during the convoy ambush scene.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5A3==&lt;br /&gt;
Several gunmen use [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5A4|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5A3]] submachine guns. An officer guarding the Polícia Militar building also holds a MP5A3.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hk-mp5n.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5A3 with Navy trigger group - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5MP5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's men fires his MP5A3 at Toretto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5MP5-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the gunmen runs with his MP5A3 in hand during the convoy ambush.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5MP5-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the police officers holds an MP5A3 in the Polícia Militar building.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==IMI Uzi==&lt;br /&gt;
A favela gangster is seen holding a [[Uzi]] submachine gun. Several of Zizi's gunmen also use them during the chase in the favela. Tej Parker ([[Ludacris]]) also carries one during the robbery of Reyes' money.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Uzi.jpg|thumb|none|350px|IMI Uzi with buttstock collapsed - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Uzi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A favela gansgter holds his Uzi.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-group-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The favela gansgter on the far right holds an Uzi.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Uzi-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Tej holds his Uzi during the safehouse robbery (circled in red).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Uzi-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's men fires his Uzi at Brian and Mia during the favela chase.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Carl Gustav M/45==&lt;br /&gt;
Favela gangsters also are seen with the [[Carl_Gustav_M/45|Carl Gustav M/45]] submachine gun. During the robbery of Reyes' safehouse, Tego ([[Tego Calderon]]) also carries a Carl Gustav M/45. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kp m45b.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Swedish K / Carl Gustav M45 Submachine Gun - 9x19mm‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M45.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A favela gangster holds his M/45 when Brian and Mia arrive in Rio.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M45-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's men ducks with his M/45 in hand.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M45-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Tego holds his M/45 during the safehouse robbery.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Colt 9mm Submachine Gun==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of Reyes' gangsters and PMERJ officers use [[M16 rifle series#Colt 9mm Submachine Gun|Colt 9mm Submachine Guns]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Colt-9mm--SMG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt RO635 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Colt9mm-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's gunmen holds his Colt submachine gun as they bust into Toretto's hideout.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5933-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A favela gangster holds his Colt 9mm submachine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Colt9mm.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Reyes' men tries to fire a Colt 9mm submachine gun at Hobbes during the convoy ambush scene.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steyr MPi 69/81==&lt;br /&gt;
One of Zizi's ([[Michael Irby]]) gunmen uses a [[Steyr MPi 69/81]] submachine gun during the convoy ambush scene.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SteyrMPi81.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr MPi81 Submachine Gun - 9x19mm. This varies from the MPi69 in that the cocking handle is more conventional, and not a combination 'cocking handle/sling mount'.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5MPi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The gunman fires the MPi.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Rifles=&lt;br /&gt;
==Colt M4A1==&lt;br /&gt;
DSS Agent Luke Hobbs ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) carries an [[M4A1]] with an [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System]] attached to it and a C-More red dot sight. Agent Fusco ([[Alimi Ballard]]) is armed with a [[M4A1]] carbine with a [[M203]] grenade launcher and an EOTech 551 and swivel mount 3x magnifier. Han ([[Sung Kang]]) uses a M4A1 with a flashlight during the safehouse robbery, and other gangsters and police officers use them as well. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sopmod m4 m203 06.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 with Aimpoint sight and M203 grenade launcher - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dwayne-johnson-fast-five-set.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A behind-the-scenes still shows [[Dwayne Johnson]] practicing with his rifle on the set. Visually, this rifle appears to be the same as the one used by Christian Bale in ''[[Terminator Salvation]]''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Fusco with his M4A1/M203 combo during the briefing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Vlcsnap-01232.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Fusco fires his M4A1/M203 combo (far left).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M4A1Han.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Han holds his M4A1 during the safehouse robbery.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M4M26.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbs fires his M4A1/M26 combo during the convoy ambush scene.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-M26-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbs fires his M4A1 during the ambush.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-M26-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbs fires his rifle during the vault robbery.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mk. 14 Mod 1 EBR==&lt;br /&gt;
Agent Wilkes ([[Fernando Chien]]) carries an [[M14 Rifle#Mk 14 Mod 0/1 Enhanced Battle Rifle |Mk. 14 Mod 1 EBR]] with an telescopic sight, Magpul CTR stock, bipod and AN/PEQ-15 IR designator as his primary firearm throughout the film. During the convoy ambush scene, Wilkes fires the weapon fully automatic.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk 14 Mod 1 EBR.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Mk 14 Mod 1 EBR with scope, Tango Down grip, Magpul CTR stock, vertical foregrip, and bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fastfive-pstill-m14.jpg|thumb|none|499px|A publicity still of Fernando Chien firing the M14 EBR.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-group-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wilkes holds the Mk. 14 behind Hobbes.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Wilkes holds the Mk. 14 behind Agent Hobbes.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M14M4UMPP90.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wilkes fires his Mk. 14 (second on the left).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M14-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Wilkes aims his Mk. 14 during the convoy ambush.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M14-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wilkes fires the Mk. 14 Mod 1.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Colt Model 933==&lt;br /&gt;
Brian O'Conner ([[Paul Walker]]) uses a [[M16 rifle series#Colt Model 933|Colt Model 933]] with a 4-position stock during the convoy ambush. One of the favela gangsters is also briefly seen with one, when Hobbs' ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) team enters the favelas. The prop is propably the same on both occasions.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Colt m4 commando 03.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Model 933 with 4-position stock - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-pstill-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Brian O'Connor ([[Paul Walker]]) aims a Colt Model 933 in the background.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5933.jpg|thumb|none|600px|O'Conner fires the Model 933.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M933.jpg|thumb|none|600px|O'Conner holds the Colt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AKMSU (With MP5K foregrip)==&lt;br /&gt;
Zizi ([[Michael Irby]]) uses a modified [[AKMSU]] with a [[MP5K]]-style foregrip and sights while searching for Toretto and O'Connor in the favela. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP5K-SEF.jpg|thumb|none|300px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5K, with SEF Plastic Trigger Pack - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKMSU Krinkov - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Frankengun-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi holds his custom AKMSU before the favela chase.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Frankengun-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi fires the rifle at Toretto and Neves.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Frankengun.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Zizi holds his AKMSU during the favela chase.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AKS-47==&lt;br /&gt;
Many of Reyes' gunmen are armed with [[AKS-47]] rifles. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKS-47.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Type III AKS-47 with stock folded - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AMD-65==&lt;br /&gt;
Several of Zizi's gunmen carry [[AK-47#AMD-65|Hungarian AMD-65]] rifles in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AMD-65.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Hungarian AMD-65 - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Note the distinctive muzzle brake and forward-slanted grip that are characteristic of AMD-65 rifles.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-AK-2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5AMD.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbes disarms one of the gunmen of his AMD-65.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5AMD-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's men goes down gripping his AMD-65.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Zastava M70AB2==&lt;br /&gt;
Several of Reyes' and Zizi's gunmen are armed with Yugoslavian [[AK-47#Zastava M70|Zastava M70AB2]] rifles throughout the film. Before the favela chase, Toretto grabs one of Zizi's gunmen, and forces him to pull the trigger of his rifle, killing a couple of Zizi's thugs.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Zastava M70 AB2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Zastava M70AB2 folding stock rifle 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The gunman with the Zastava M70AB2 opens fire.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-AK-2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Zastava-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the favela gangsters holds his Zastava rifle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Zastava-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Zizi's gunmen fires his Zastava at Brian and Mia.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Zastava-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Hobbes uses one of the gunmen own Zastava against his mate.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Zastava.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A couple of Zizi's gunmen hold their Zastava rifles.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AR-15 Carbine==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Brazilian Military Police officers use [[M16 rifle series#AR-15 Carbine|AR-15 Carbines]] with removable iron sights while guarding the Polícia Militar building. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AR15earliervariant.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AR-15 Carbine with 20 round magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-M4-2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A police officer stands guard with an AR-15.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5AR15.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Brazilian police officer fires his AR-15 at Hobbs' vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Colt AR-15 Sporter Carbine==&lt;br /&gt;
One of Zizi's gunmen is armed with a [[M16|Colt AR-15 Sporter Carbine]] during the favela chase.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSporterIIw30RdMag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Sporter II Carbine with 30 round magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Sporter.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The gunman goes down holding his Colt Sporter Carbine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M16/SP1==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the Brazilian Military Police officers carry and fire [[M16|M16/SP1]] rifles during the vault robbery. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16-SP1-30Mag.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|M16 aka SP1 (flat &amp;quot;slab side receiver&amp;quot;) with an A1 &amp;quot;birdcage&amp;quot; Flash hider, used to impersonate the M16A1 during the 1970s and 1980s. This version has a 30 round magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Brazilian officer holds his M16 rifle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M16-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the officers fires his rifle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Vlcsnap-01381.jpg|thumb|none|600px|If you look closely, you can see the slab-sided receiver that distinguishes the rifle as a M16/SP1.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==FN FAL==&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of the PMERJ officers carry [[FN FAL]] battle rifles in the Polícia Militar building.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN FAL 50 00.jpg|thumb|none|400px| FN FAL 50.00 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5FNFAL.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the PMERJ officers holds his FN FAL.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5FNFAL-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A PMERJ officer holds his FN FAL in the Polícia Militar building.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Shotguns=&lt;br /&gt;
==Remington 870==&lt;br /&gt;
Dominic Toretto ([[Vin Diesel]]) carries what appears to be a [[Remington 870]] entry gun when he raids one of Reyes' ([[Joaquim de Almeida]]) safe houses. He gives the shotgun to O'Conner ([[Paul Walker]]), as he proceeds to burn Reyes' money.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rem870entry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 Entry Gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fastfive-pstill-shotgun.jpg|thumb|none|500px|[[Paul Walker]] holds the Remington 870 entry gun in a publicity still.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-shotgun-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Toretto enter the safehouse, wielding his 870 Entry Gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5EntryGun.jpg|thumb|none|600px|O'Conner throws the gun on his shoulder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mossberg 590==&lt;br /&gt;
Agent Chato ([[Yorgo Constantine]]) carries a [[Mossberg 590]] with Surefire forend, an ATI collapsible stock and a door-breaching brake when Hobbs and Toretto first confront each other. Toretto ([[Vin Diesel]]) is later seen using Chatos's Mossberg when the DSS convoy is ambushed. One of Zizi's gunmen also briefly fires a Mossberg 590 with a heat shield during the convoy ambush. A PMERJ officer is also seen firing a 590 during a car chase. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mossberg590CompactCruiserBreach.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mossberg 590 &amp;quot;Cruiser&amp;quot; with door breaching brake - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mossberg500 Cruiser ext.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mossberg 590 &amp;quot;Cruiser&amp;quot; with extended magazine tube - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-shotgun-2.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-pstill-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5590-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Agent Chato with the customized Mossberg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M590.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the gunmen fires his Mossberg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5590.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Toretto fires the Mossberg during the ambush.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M590-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Toretto pumps the Mossberg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5PolShot.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A police officer fires his shotgun during the vault chase.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M26 MASS==&lt;br /&gt;
Hobbs has an [[M26 Modular Acessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS shotgun]] attached to a M4A1 carbine. He uses it during the vault robbery.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PEO M26 MASS on M4 Carbine.jpg|thumb|none|399px|M4A1 carbine 5.56x45mm with M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fas-five-still-johnson-m4a1-mass.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A publicity still showing [[Dwayne Johnson]] with his MASS-equipped M4.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M4M26.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hobbes fires his M4A1/M26 combo during the convoy ambush scene.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 916==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the favela gangsters is briefly seen holding a [[Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 916 Shotgun Series|Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 916]] shotgun, when Hobbs ([[Dwayne Johnson]]) and his team go to the favelas. Santos ([[Don Omar]]) also uses one during the robbery of Reyes' safehouse.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Smith-&amp;amp;-Wesson-916A-Shotgun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Smith &amp;amp; Wesson Model 916A - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5916.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the favela gangsters holds a 916 shotgun as the camera pans past him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5916-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Santos holds his shotgun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other=&lt;br /&gt;
==M134 Minigun==&lt;br /&gt;
One of Reyes' men fires a [[GE M134 Minigun]] with a shortened barrel, as he chases Toretto and O'Connor in the finale. The sound effect of it firing makes it sound like generic &amp;quot;machine gun fire&amp;quot; than an actual minigun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Minigun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|left|Dillon Aero M134 with flash suppressor - 7.62x51mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Minigun.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The man raises the minigun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fastfive-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Reyes' men fires the minigun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Type 69 RPG==&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of Reyes' men use [[RPG-7|Type 69 RPGs]] to ambush Hobbs' convoy. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type69RPG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Chinese Type 69 RPG - 40mm]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F569RPG.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of the gunmen gets mowed down by Vince.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M26 Hand Grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
Reyes' men use [[M26 hand grenade|M26 hand grenades]] while ambushing Hobbs' convoy.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:200px-M-67handgrenade.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M26 HE Frag hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5M26.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A couple of M26 hand grenades drop next to Agent Fusco.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mk 2 hand grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
A number of [[Mk 2 hand grenade]]s are seen on a table of weapons at Hobb's base. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MK2 grenade DoD.jpg|thumb|none|250px|Mk 2 hand grenade|Mk 2 &amp;quot;Pineapple&amp;quot; High-Explosive Fragmentation hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F5Mk2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A couple of Mk 2 hand grenades can be seen on the table (circled in red).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=The Fast and the Furious Film Series=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Fast and the Furious]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[2 Fast 2 Furious]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Fast and Furious]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''Fast Five'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Action Movie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Crime]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535441</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535441"/>
		<updated>2012-03-21T05:26:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* AN-94 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same catagory, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own catagory at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has seperate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance.  The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit.  The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to Battlefield 2. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet and doesn't actually show up on the gun. In fact, the only thing the suppressor does is take up an attachment slot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] will be one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  Nothing else is known about it, except that the stock is unfolded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|4685px|SPAS-12 - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four captial letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and Foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs. Interesting note about the way the player character reloads the AN-94, he flicks the magazine out with another magazine, the same applies to the AEK-971.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabelled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1 without the Extended Magazine attachment, but given that the attachment is unlocked by default it is clear that this is simply for balancing reasons, so the player can't use 100 round and another attachment, just like the Street Sweeper and Jackhammer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customise menu. Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch later removed the burst mode, but it is still present on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22. the pilot of the Antonov is a big fan of Top Gun and is getting as much low-altitude fly-by practice in as he can before the real war starts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steyr AUG==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay trailer shows the AUG in the killfeed, and it can be seen in at least one screenshot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1.Steyr AUG A3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr AUGA3 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3wallpaper.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The soldier in the foreground can be seen holding an AUGA3 (Note the tri-railed handguard and the placement of the charging handle)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned. It is still identified as an M320 in the kill feed. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines and is equipped with a vertical foregrip. The AT4 will only appear in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an AT4 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries an AT4 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player wields the MK 153 SMAW as he prepares to dish out some disproportionate retribution on some tumbleweeds for giving him allergies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an M15 anti-tank mine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspiciously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8 during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535440</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535440"/>
		<updated>2012-03-21T05:22:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same catagory, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own catagory at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has seperate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance.  The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit.  The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to Battlefield 2. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet and doesn't actually show up on the gun. In fact, the only thing the suppressor does is take up an attachment slot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] will be one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  Nothing else is known about it, except that the stock is unfolded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|4685px|SPAS-12 - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four captial letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and Foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabelled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1 without the Extended Magazine attachment, but given that the attachment is unlocked by default it is clear that this is simply for balancing reasons, so the player can't use 100 round and another attachment, just like the Street Sweeper and Jackhammer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customise menu. Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch later removed the burst mode, but it is still present on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22. the pilot of the Antonov is a big fan of Top Gun and is getting as much low-altitude fly-by practice in as he can before the real war starts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steyr AUG==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay trailer shows the AUG in the killfeed, and it can be seen in at least one screenshot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1.Steyr AUG A3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr AUGA3 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3wallpaper.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The soldier in the foreground can be seen holding an AUGA3 (Note the tri-railed handguard and the placement of the charging handle)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned. It is still identified as an M320 in the kill feed. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines and is equipped with a vertical foregrip. The AT4 will only appear in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an AT4 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries an AT4 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player wields the MK 153 SMAW as he prepares to dish out some disproportionate retribution on some tumbleweeds for giving him allergies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an M15 anti-tank mine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspiciously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8 during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535439</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535439"/>
		<updated>2012-03-21T05:15:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same catagory, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own catagory at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has seperate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance.  The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit.  The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to Battlefield 2. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet and doesn't actually show up on the gun. In fact, the only thing the suppressor does is take up an attachment slot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] will be one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  Nothing else is known about it, except that the stock is unfolded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|4685px|SPAS-12 - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four captial letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and Foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabelled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1 without the Extended Magazine attachment, but given that the attachment is unlocked by default it is clear that this is simply for balancing reasons, so the player can't use 100 round and another attachment, just like the Street Sweeper and Jackhammer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customise menu. Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch later removed the burst mode, but it is still present on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steyr AUG==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay trailer shows the AUG in the killfeed, and it can be seen in at least one screenshot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1.Steyr AUG A3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Steyr AUGA3 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3wallpaper.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The soldier in the foreground can be seen holding an AUGA3 (Note the tri-railed handguard and the placement of the charging handle)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned. It is still identified as an M320 in the kill feed. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines and is equipped with a vertical foregrip. The AT4 will only appear in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an AT4 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries an AT4 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player wields the MK 153 SMAW as he prepares to dish out some disproportionate retribution on some tumbleweeds for giving him allergies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an M15 anti-tank mine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspiciously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8 during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535438</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=535438"/>
		<updated>2012-03-21T05:03:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* L96 Irons?! */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An LRSR mission with the Barrett like the one in CoD4 would have been awesome to have in BF3. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Holy crap, I thought that was a real Marine in that pic at first! :O [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:35, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, most definitely. We welcome clarification on any component or add-on used in the game. IMFDB's priorities are much different than those of game-based wikis. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 10:31, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you guys think we should have a section for the attachments in the game, since there are so many? For most games it wouldn't be necessary, but here there are 12 different optics, the aftermarket irons, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, six (I think) suppressors, PEQ-2, pistol laser sight, and a tac light. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 15 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please include the info on which flash suppressors and other accessories are being used on which guns in the screenshots (as well as an addendum at the end of the page outlining just which real-life firearm accessories are in the game). There are many of us not in the know who would like to learn about them. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:32, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: SCAR-L (misspelled as SCARL-L; I tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: ACR (as ACW-R, like PDW-R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: &amp;quot;M5K&amp;quot; (don't know what it is, described as M5K tactical machine pistol)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LIST EDITED&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::After thinking about it a bit, I'm starting to think the M5K is meant to be the MP5K, when you consider that they've renamed a couple of H&amp;amp;K weapons like the HK53 and the HK416, it's plausible that they had some licensing issues with H&amp;amp;K like they seem to have had with Magpul and Glock (No surprise there, considering how notoriously protective Glock is of their brand), So they probably just renamed it the M5K. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 10:29, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Either that, or they misspelled it, like they did the SCAR-L.  And if the MP5 doesn't have H&amp;amp;K's name in its name, they probably wouldn't have to rename it.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:18, 14 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You also have to take into account that some of the weapons used by said classes in the trailer could just be kits they picked up in the middle of the battle, perhaps to throw off the assertion of which one belongs to who. I'm just glad the L86A1 is in there, finally another British weapon added, just add a Browning Hi-Power or a SIG P226 and I'm set! [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 14:38, 14 March 2012 (CDT)Draco122&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Recon: HK417 (as M417, like M416)&amp;quot; TAKE MY MONEY ALREADY. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:59, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L96 Irons?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What in the holy hell is that garbage?! finally a rifle with good iron sights and the stick a SECOND front sight on the end of the receiver rail... for a whopping 7&amp;quot; sight radius... dear god what a disappointment. [[User:Furious Oyster|Furious Oyster]]&lt;br /&gt;
:As a side note, that isn't an L96 front sight, looks more like the one that is on the G22 (German variant of the AWM).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:39, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hahaha, that was my reaction too. The sights will be fixed in that big patch that should be out this month. It was on that huge notes list. EDIT: I think the BF3 rifle IS the G22; folding stock &amp;amp; front sight. [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/G22_ohne_Schalldaempfer.jpg here][[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:55, 16 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|400px|none|G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: question on the L96, what is it chambered in? It should be .300 Winchester Magnum (I think?) but the ingame description says 7.62mmx51mm NATO... [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 00:03, 21 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=534824</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=534824"/>
		<updated>2012-03-20T01:58:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Pancor Jackhammer */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Battlefield 3''''' (also known as '''''BF3''''') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', and direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]''. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions Creative Entertainment (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts in 2011 for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360. The game is powered by the proprietary Frostbite 2 engine, a further development of the engine used in the ''Bad Company'' games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 92SB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 92SB]], modified to resemble the [[Beretta 93R|93R]], can be unlocked as a sidearm in Co-Op requiring a 86,000 Co-Op Score. The weapon has been fitted with the 93R's muzzle brake and foregrip, as well as being modified to fire 3 round bursts. Uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BerettaM92SB.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Beretta 92SB - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_93r_slide_locked.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character stops to admire his custom weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;, Blackburn acquires a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]]. It can also be seen holstered on some US Marine throughout the single-player campaign. In multiplayer it is the starting handgun for US forces. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine is 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. In multiplayer, Players can unlock additional M9's outfitted with a Tactical Light and a Sound Suppressor separately as they level (rank) up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an M9 at the start of the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; This one of only two times in the entire campaign the player character has a sidearm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A US Marine holds a M9 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M9 being reloaded in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine aims at a suspicious looking M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Note that the sights are correct for a M9.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_M9_suppressed.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M9 with a suppressor. Different classes of weapon use different suppressor models, but those models are shared among the weapons of that class. The only exceptions to this are the G3A3 and SCAR-H CQC, which use the same model as the sniper rifles because of their caliber.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot;, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight, while a variant that has both a laser sight and a suppressor is available as a later unlock. It is the only handgun that lets you equip two attachments at a time. Also, all of the US Assault kit soldiers have a G17 in a chest holster in addition to whatever their selected sidearm is, and this G17 does not have a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|400px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Glock-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A dead PLR soldier with a Glock 17 at his side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rrt877 g17c reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock 17 in multiplayer reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsuppressed variant (though this has been fixed in the regular game and the unsuppressed version is unlocked at Rank 30 with the suppressed variant unlocked at 41). Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game. It is an incredibly effective sidearm in close quarters, but is useless at medium range and beyond unless burst fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. All three variants of the M1911 are also unlocked for multiplayer by completing the single player campaign. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, a Springfield slide, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, Pachmayr rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines. It comes with additional variants that incorporate a Tactical Flashlight or Sound Suppressor. A variant with both aforementioned attachments is available only to DICE employees. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character in multiplayer holds a MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the MEU(SOC) pistol in multiplayer, the player character dumps the empty magazine...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...and lines up a fresh one (that's actually loaded) with the magazine well. Note that the markings and slanted serrations show it is a Springfield made slide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character aims down the tritium sights of his MEU(SOC) pistol.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MEU(SOC)-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A player character vaults over a fence with his MEU(SOC) pistol, appreciative of the fact that he actually has legs in this game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm that can only be unlocked by achieving a 5000 Co-Op Score. Unlike in ''Bad Company 2'', the top break cartridge ejector is seen in full effect actually ejecting spent rounds as opposed to &amp;quot;flicking&amp;quot; them out. It is considerably different by having a slightly faster rate of fire and being more effective at close range compared to it's larger .44 cousin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 REX.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The player character in multiplayer holds an MP-412 REX.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_1.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Pictured: the automatic extractor in action. Not pictured: Antigravity field generator.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Bf3_MP412_reload_3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'' and is the Russian faction's sidearm. In Multiplayer the player unlocks the Tactical Light and Sound Suppressor as they level up instead of by gaining kills with the weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|400px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Vladimir uses his MP-443 as one of Solomon's men demonstrates how not to steal a car stereo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP443-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his MP-443 on Blackburn as he tries to blame everything on a fire extinguisher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 grach reload 16.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 444 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .44 version of the [[Taurus Model 44]], the Model 444, appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name. In the campaign, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm. In multiplayer, a variant with a PK-A scope is fittingly unlocked at Rank 44.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 444 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Solomon aims his Taurus Model 444 at Blackburn during the introductory level. Visible in the full-sized image is what appears to be an empty speedloader hovering in mid-air behind the weapon, just above Solomon's wrist.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn soon finds himself getting a closer look at the barrel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Taurus44-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Prior to the start of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Solomon is seen aiming his Taurus at an injured Marine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
A large number of weapons appear on dog tags associated with a similar weapon, weapon of the same family, weapon of the same catagory, or in a few cases, weapons that make no sense at all. As there are so many, the weapons found '''only''' on dog tags have been placed in their own catagory at the bottom of each class of weapon. This is to avoid confusion as to which weapons are actually in the game and which ones are only pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt 1873 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Single Action Army|Colt 1873]], more commonly known as the Single Action Army, is featured on the Dog Tag the player is rewarded with when they get the ''Handgun Medal'', for getting the ''Handgun Ribbon'' 50 times. A ''Handgun Ribbon'' is awarded when the player kills four enemies with handguns in a game, and can be awarded multiple times in a game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtSingleActionArmy.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Colt Single Action Army w/ 5.5&amp;quot; barrel known as the &amp;quot;Artillery&amp;quot; model. The most common of the SAA revolvers as it is just the right length. - .45 Long Colt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SAA.jpg|thumb|none|300px|The Western-themed ''Handgun Dog Tag''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Colt M1911A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M1911A1]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the MEU(SOC) pistol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Makarov PB ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Makarov PM|Makarov PB]] very oddly appears on the Dog Tag awarded for getting 100 kills with the Suppressed MP-443 Grach. Though they are both suppressed Russian pistols, they have almost nothing else in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit. It can use either a 20- or 40-round magazine. It must be unlocked in the Co-Op mode, requiring 34,000 Score. It does low damage to enemies, but has a very high rate of fire and manageable recoil to balance it out. An interesting thing to note is that this weapon has seperate reload animations for the 20 and 40 round magazines (the 20 round magazine is dropped via the use of gravity, while the 40 round magazine is manually removed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an MP7A1 with suppressor, EOTech sight and 40-round extended magazine during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn loads a new 40-round magazine into his MP7A1 as he is menaced by a series of incomprehensible graffiti tags.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The 20-round magazine for the MP7A1 frequently glitches and fails to appear during the campaign; here in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot; Blackburn reloads one with a large flash suppressor, IRNV scope and laser pointer...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MP7-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...whereas earlier he just told his vanilla one to imagine it was full of bullets that were ''this'' big.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This weapon can be used by all four classes, and has an ammo capacity of 25 + 1. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single / 2 round burst / full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-UMP-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his UMP during &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer,&amp;quot; wondering why he didn't have it the first time he went through this section. Note the caution on the side of the weapon to read the owner's manual; while this makes some sense on this level where the UMPs are seen in the hands of terrorists, the warning is still present even in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; when the UMPs are used by the US military; military UMPs should not have it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ump.jpg|thumb|none|601px|UMP in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90 TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FN P90 TR boasts a large ammo capacity at 50 + 1, a high rate of fire, and excellent accuracy at the expense of suffering from low damage at long distance.  The weapon is capable of being used by all four classes in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-P90-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a P90TR during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-19 Bizon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash PP-19 Bizon|PP-19 Bizon]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit.  The weapon features a slightly inaccurate magazine capacity of 54 rounds (where the real life 9x19mm Parabellum helical magazine has a max capacity of 53).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bizon1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Early PP-19 Bizon - 9x18mm Makarov. The version in game is this early model, but is chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PP19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-19 Bizon on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from ''Bad Company 2'', feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PP2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his PP-2000 after completing a HALO jump into Northern Iran at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main ''Battlefield'' series game (excluding spinoffs like ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]''), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#SWD.2FCobray_Street_Sweeper|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine and lack of a rear-mounted drum advance lever. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it. The name was kept as an homage to Battlefield 2. The weapon has an incorrect capacity of 8-rounds by default, but the correct 12 if the extended magazine attachment is used. This is most likely for balance, so players can't use a semi-auto, 12 round shotgun AND 3 attachments on top of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CobrayStreetSweeper.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SWD / Cobray Street Sweeper with short barrel and top folding stock - 12 gauge. Visible is the Cobray logo on the side, no visible drum advance lever like on the Striker and the recognizable 'key' in the front of the drum for winding up the rotary cylinder.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-Streetsweeper-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Street Sweeper fitted with a Kobra reflex sight at the start of the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds). When reloading from empty, the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly, just like the 870 MCS. It's unrealistically inaccurate despite having a Cylinder Bore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M1014-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M1014 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m1014 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M1014 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be used only in the Assault kit in the &amp;quot;Gadget 1&amp;quot; slot. It may be used either as a standalone weapon, or mounted on any of the assault rifles if said rifle is equipped with the underslung rail. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns. For some odd reason, the AEK-971 and AN-94 cannot mount the M26 MASS despite having underslung rails. A model glitch exists on some weapons that mount the M26 MASS where the charging handle will stay up even when the weapon is not in use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M26 MASS - 12 gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 Mass.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M26 standalone.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mass mounted reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|MASS mounted on a M16A3 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pancor Jackhammer]], called the &amp;quot;MK3A1,&amp;quot; is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by any kit. It can be safely assumed it will not emulate the real weapon's problems with failing to cycle. It is fully automatic and the only shotgun that can mount a suppressor. It should be noted that the suppressor does absolutely nothing to make the Jackhammer any more quiet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jackhammer.jpg‎|400px|thumb|none|Pancor Jackhammer - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Jackhammer-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Jackhammer on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870MCS&amp;quot;. The player pumps the shotgun very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in-game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be. Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1. As with the M1014, when reloading from empty the player character loads a round into the chamber first, then fills the tube, and using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Remington_870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington 870 MCS - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an 870 MCS with a tactical light during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MCS-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's starting weapons in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine&amp;quot; is this Remington 870 MCS with a laser aiming module. Precisely what this is for when he has his Big Magic White Circle for aiming with is unclear.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3_870MCS_Frag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Firing a 12 gauge fragmentation round from the 870. It looks impressive and can suppress enemies well, but it does about as much damage as a firecracker without a direct hit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_chamberload_870mcs_ext_mag.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Chamberloading an 870 that has an extended magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Saiga-12K - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a rather beat-up camouflaged Saiga 12K during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; can be a little on the strange side at times; here Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a Saiga 12K fitted with a laser aiming module and PK-AS optic, watching in bemusement as shooting the windshield of a car makes two men who had clipped inside it dramatically leap through the roof. For a finishing touch, the car exploded immediately afterwards.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Saiga-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Wary of any other weirdness, Dmitri reloads his Saiga 12K.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game, barring Back to Karkand's MK3A1 Jackhammer. The magazine capacity is incorrectly 6+1 by standard or the correct 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped, most likely for balance, same as the Striker. When optics are attached it becomes a WM-12, an American semi-auto clone of the USAS-12, but with a rail instead of the carry handle. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-USAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his USAS-12, which, according to the trademarks, was made by &amp;quot;Baewoo Brecisions&amp;quot; of Korea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SPAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SPAS-12]] will be one of the 10 guns appearing in the upcoming Close Quarters expansion pack.  Nothing else is known about it, except that the stock is unfolded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3SPAS12.jpg|thumb|none|4685px|SPAS-12 - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SPAS-12 ===&lt;br /&gt;
One of the strangest weapons to appear on a different weapon's Dog Tag, the [[SPAS-12]] appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the USAS-12. Other than four captial letters followed by &amp;quot;-12&amp;quot;, both being 12-gauge, and that they were both in the [[Battlefield: Bad Company]] series, they have little in common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5,56A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[5,56A-91]] appears as part of the incredibly vague &amp;quot;Compact Assault Rifle&amp;quot; classification, and thus is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the [[9A-91]] from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one. Called &amp;quot;[[A-91]]&amp;quot; in the game, which refers to the 7.62x39mm variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|400px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-A91-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky looks at fellow GRU agent Vladimir holding a 5,56A-91 as they go to work at the start of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 a-91 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|5,56A-91 in MP reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. It cannot mount the M26 MASS due to a bug on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AEK-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AEK-971 near the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 AEK971.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-971 in Battlefield 3 with Kobra Red dot sight and Foregrip attached. Note that because of a glitch, both the indirect flightpath crosshair and the standard crosshair appear when switching rapidly between the grenade launcher and primary weapon. Switching to secondary weapon and back again fixes this issue.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877_aek2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aek2 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-917 in MP, reloading.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an AK-74M equipped with a PSO-1 scope during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot; Weapons on the ground do not show their attachments or have text signifying what they have attached, meaning occasionally picking up a boring-looking vanilla weapon will result in the player character producing Excalibur as here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ak74m reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn wrestles with one of Solomon's men during the introductory mission &amp;quot;Semper Fidelis.&amp;quot; On the Xbox 360 version before the Back to Karkand update, this terrorist was instead armed with a UMP45, but still gives Blackburn an AKS-74U when he dies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the start of the mission &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn relieves a PLR soldier of this AKS-74U with a Kobra reflex sight, suppressor and tactical light.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 aks74u reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Aks74u in multiplayer, note the milled receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. Before a patch, the weapon lacked the semi-automatic mode found on the real weapon, instead featuring only the 2-burst and full-auto modes. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|400px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AN94-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds an AN-94 equipped with a PKS-07 long-range scope as he looks over an airdropped Russian D-30 122mm howitzer during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds his starting weapon, an AS Val assault rifle with a Kobra reflex sight, during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-ASVal-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Kiril holds his AS Val near the end of &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 552 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, Hogue pistol grip, M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-1.jpg‎|602px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds an M4A1 during &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Blackburn reloads his M4A1. &amp;quot;For law enforcement / military use&amp;quot; is printed on the side of the EOTech optic. Note also the fire selector on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M4-3.jpg|600px|thumb|none|Reloading with the rifle in shadow reveals a snake-like design engraved on the mag well; this is present in ''[[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'', though as a dark shape that shows up in light rather than a silvery etching that only shows up in the dark. Also note that the semi-auto position reads &amp;quot;Fire&amp;quot;, meaning it was modeled on a civilian M4 variant, which also explains why the selector is in this position.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapons to be shown in early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development; these were added later on. Some later footage showed the M16 with the gas block missing when mounting sights, but this too was corrected in the final release. Both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) are available for use within the game. They have [[M16 rifle series#M16A1 Rifle|M16A1]] flash hiders, KAC RIS handguards with a rail cover on the right side rail, a Hogue pistol grip, Magpul loops on the magazines, and a cloth sleeve wrapped around the stock. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-1.jpg|601px|thumb|none|Blackburn holds his M16A3 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M16-2.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A Marine reloads his M16A3 with a mounted Trijicon ACOG scope in multiplayer. Note that there are actually bullets in the magazine, a relatively rare sight in a modern shooter. But unfortunately, like in most modern shooters, the fire selector is always set to semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. The improved foregrip of the Sama model only appears if the Foregrip attachment is used in multiplayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use with a 17,000 co-op score. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-KH2002-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds a KH2002 during the mission &amp;quot;Uprising&amp;quot; as he discovers the exit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-KH2002-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his KH2002, showing that the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAMAS Surbaissé ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS|FAMAS Surbaissé]] (FAMAS Low Profile) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit. The weapon is shown with the large G1 / G2 trigger guard rather than the twin grips this version seems to use. In-game, the FAMAS has a 30+1 capacity, but is modeled with 25 round magazines. The capacity is going to be reduced to the correct 25+1 in a patch expected in March 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FAMASFELIN2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FAMAS Surbaissé - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-FAMAS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FAMAS Surbaissé on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 famas3 reload.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped. The F2000 can mount a bipod and foregrip like the other assault rifles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-F2000-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads an F2000 with EOTech reflex sight during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SCAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn reloads his SCAR-H at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 mk17 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36 (&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hybrid of the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36]] and G36C, mislabelled as &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; (a weapon with a production run of around 100 units) is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. The weapon has the full-length forearm and barrel of the G36, but the carry handle and shorter stock of the G36C, as well as having a C-Mag fitted. The C-Mag only holds 50+1 instead of the correct 100+1 without the Extended Magazine attachment, but given that the attachment is unlocked by default it is clear that this is simply for balancing reasons, so the player can't use 100 round and another attachment, just like the Street Sweeper and Jackhammer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36 CMag.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Configuration typically called &amp;quot;MG36;&amp;quot; actually just a standard G36 with a bipod handguard and C-Mag - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MG36-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; on the customise menu. Note the 12x sniper scope attached, in case you feel the need to give suppressive fire from 1000+ meters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G36-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a G36C he took from a French police officer during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades.&amp;quot; Note that while the fire selector is in the correct position for fully automatic fire, the white position indicator is pointing to &amp;quot;safe.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] is available in both single and multiplayer. It is an actual H&amp;amp;K G3A3, and not an Iranian clone. It has a wide handguard, and the fire selector markings are S-E-F. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver. It can be unlocked for use in multiplayer by gaining 160,000 Co-Op score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-G3-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a G3A3 with ACOG scope during the mission &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-G3A3-Pickup.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416,&amp;quot; seemingly just because that's what it was called in the ''Bad Company'' games since it is no longer shown as a standardised US military weapon in singleplayer. At release, it featured semi-auto, burst, and full-auto modes, something that isn't typically possible with AR-15 type rifles and derivatives. A patch later removed the burst mode, but it is still present on the Xbox 360 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-HK416-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn runs with his HK416 with M320 grenade launcher, straight into a most unpleasant surprise. The Russian transport craft depicted is an Antonov An-22.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK33|HK53]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the G53. It is a compact version of the HK33 rifle, and as a carbine, it can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;KHK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK53 - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-HK53-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|HK53 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 hk53 reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L85A2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Enfield L85 rifle series|L85A2]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Assault kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:L85A2Iron.jpg|thumb|none|400px|L85A2 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L85-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|L85A2 on the customisation screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;. Uses either 20 or 30 round polymer magazines, with 20 being the default option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PDR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky reloads his PDR as he ponders the wisdom of Vladimir's &amp;quot;walking into a fire&amp;quot; plan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBZ-95B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBZ-95B]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and, as a carbine, can be used by the Engineer kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbz-95carb s.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBZ-95B - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBZ95B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBZ-95B on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It can only be unlocked in Co-Op by achieving a score of 120,000. In the campaign mode, the SG 553 is found in two places. The first is in &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;, where a police officer exiting the van has one, and the other one being found by the player after the train crashes in &amp;quot;The Great Destroyer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SG553-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds a SIG SG 553 during the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot; as he fights his way through a French police cordon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington ACR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington ACR|Remington ACR]] joins the arsenal of Battlefield 3 as part of the upcoming 'Close Quarters' map pack and was first seen in the &amp;quot;Ziba Tower&amp;quot; gameplay video. Inaccurately appears as the &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; (Likely meaning 'Adaptive Combat Weapon - Rifle'), much like the PDW-R, and sports the tri-rail foregrip standard on the entry variant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bushmasteracrentry.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Remington ACR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 ACW-R.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot; in the player's hands]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30 shows an [[M203]] mounted to an [[M16A1]], complete with the heatshield handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M16A2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dog Tag the player recieves for 500 kills with the M16A3/A4 shows an [[M16A2]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAMAS ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[FAMAS]] (G2?) appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the FAMAS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN F2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standard version of the F2000, with its built in scope, appears on the 500 kill Dog Tag for the F2000 Tactical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FN Mk 16 Mod 0 (SCAR-L)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After getting 100 kills with a weapon, the player is awarded with a dogtag to display their accomplishment. There appears to have been an oversight in the making of the SCAR-H dogtag, as it shows a [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-L|SCAR]] with what is very clearly a 5.56 STANAG magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN SCAR-L (Standard).jpg|thumb|400px|none|Third Generation FN SCAR-L - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_SCAR_L_dogtag.jpg|thumb|none|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine. It is shown with a 4-vent handguard, but the correct extended barrel for the version is shown, the handguard simply covering less of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-IAR-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M27 IAR equipped with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and tactical light in the mission &amp;quot;Kaffarov.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 iar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some US Marines, and in the hands of the player character, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|One of Blackburn's fellow Marines, Montes, holds his M240B fitted with an M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 M240B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an M240B with M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249E3 Para SAW / Mk 46 Mod 0 Hybrid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249E3 Para SAW]] is featured in the game. It has a STANAG magazine well, identifying it as an M249 rather than a Mark 46, but the fixed buttstock and rail system are features of the Mk 46 Mod 0. This configuration is typical of Airsoft &amp;quot;Mk 46&amp;quot; guns which have Mk 46 features but retain their STANAG wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249ParaWAmmo.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN M249 Para - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M249-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the hybrid SAW near the end of Operation Swordbreaker. Note the STANAG magazine well visible under the belt.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SAW-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn sets up the bipod of his SAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 m249.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M60E4 Mk.43 with Picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M60-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M60E4 with M145 Machine Gun Optic as Kaffarov's bodyguards have the brilliant idea of firing an RPG-7 indoors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBB-95 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBB-95]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Support kit. Uses 75 round drums by default, and can also use 100 round drums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:QBB95Scope.jpg|thumb|none|400px|QBB-95 with 75-round drum magazine and 4x scope - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBB95-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBB-95 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. This is quite odd, as the QBZ-95B, QBB-95, and QBU-88 all use their proper &amp;quot;QB&amp;quot; names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QJY88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky discovers a QJY-88 with the rare and for some reason unpopular linoleum-plated finish.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|401px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a PKP Pecheneg as he infiltrates someone's garage in &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-PKP-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovski uses his PKP Pecheneg to make some amendments to the internal layout of a building. Mostly new doors.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class. It is referred to in game as an &amp;quot;[[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]]&amp;quot;, a modernised 5.45x39mm version with synthetic furnishings and a flash hider, despite that it is not shown with a flash hider. The weapon's damage matches the idea that it is a -74 model, as it is scaled to the 5.56mm machine guns, as opposed to behaving like a 7.62x39. When mounting optics the weapon gains side-mounted bracket for attaching them; if it does not mount optics, the bracket is not present. It can sometimes be found fitted with a vertical front grip attached to the underside of the handguard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|400px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn holds an RPK equipped with a Kobra reflex sight during &amp;quot;Uprising.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks down at an RPK on the ground; note the lack of a rail under the handguard. Despite this, it can still mount a RIS foregrip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPK-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading an RPK fitted with an odd aftermarket bipod; the real RPK bipod is fixed just behind the front sight and folds backwards. This bipod is actually shorter than the magazine and therefore would not be particularly useful.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L86A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Enfield L86A1 is an upcoming weapon, being added as a part of the &amp;quot;Close Quarters&amp;quot; map pack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SA80-L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Enfield L86A1 - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3 L86A1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his L86A1. Note that the image blur is from &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MG36 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the fact that BF3's &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; is a hybrid of G36 variants, a configuration correct for an actual MG36 appears on the Dog Tag the player is awarded with for getting 500 kills with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked. It is incredibly accurate and powerful, but is heavy and suffers from substantial sway unless a bipod is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-98B-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn uses an M98B with the bipod set up as he assaults the bank at the end of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M107 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107]] is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer. It only appears in the singleplayer level &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot;, where player character Dmitri Mayakovsky acquires it due to a somewhat bizarre series of events that don't seem to play out quite the way they were intended to. Here, it is equipped with a thermal scope. When reloading the weapon from empty, the player character removes the magazine and replaces it with his left hand, but in order the charge the weapon he utilizes his right hand.  This is the only weapon animation in the game where the character utilizes both hands to reload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Barrett M107 long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In the room ''before'' Dmitri Mayakovsky is actually supposed to get the M107, he acquires the M107 by approaching the door.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|On opening the door he finds an enemy sniper kindly carrying the M107 he already has, with the barrel pretending to be a bipod and the magazine very badly wanting to be the pistol grip.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;Thank you, I had no idea why I was carrying that.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Barrett-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky thanks the man by murdering him with his own SV-98 and proceeds onward, armed with the M107.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accuracy International G22==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_series#Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare_Magnum|Accuracy International G22]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack as the &amp;quot;L96&amp;quot;, and can be used by the Recon kit. True to its reputation, the gun is extremely accurate at long ranges, with minimal bullet drop allowing for precise headshots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AI AW G22.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Accuracy International G22 - .300 Winchester Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-L96-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|G22 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class. It can be unlocked earlier should a player receive 58,000 Co-Op Score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M39-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Dmitri Mayakovsky holds an M39 EBR rather curiously equipped with a Russian PK-AS optic as he looks around Kaffarov's villa. He might be a bad guy, but he sure knows how to keep the place neat.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 ebr reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5 sniper rifle]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|401px|M40A5 sniper rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M40-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a suppressed M40A5 fitted with an IR scope during the mission &amp;quot;Night Shift.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] can be found occasionally in the single-player campaign. It is the default rifle for the US Recon kit in multiplayer, outfitted by standard with a 8x rifle scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mod11-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|Blackburn holds a scoped Mk 11 Mod 0 during Operation Swordbreaker.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Marine sniper in multiplayer provides some overwatch with his scoped Mk 11 Mod 0.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|After some successful hunting, he reloads his rifle...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk 11-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...And hits the bolt-release. Note that the fire-selector is set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from ''[[Battlefield Play4Free]]'', once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]'' It is default for the Russian Recon Kit sporting a PKS-07 7x Scope by default, though the correct PSO-1 4x scope is the first attachment unlocked at only 10 kills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 NorincoNDM Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an NDM-86 fitted with a PKS-07 scope.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== QBU-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QB rifle series|QBU-88]] is included in the Back To Karkand expansion pack, and can be used by the Recon kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Qbu-88-0.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Norinco QBU-88 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-QBU88-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|QBU-88 on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SKS with Tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SKS-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SKS on the customise menu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SKS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character in multiplayer holds an SKS as he ponders if there might be a tank nearby.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SV-98 with suppressor, bipod, carrying handle, and mirage band - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-SV98-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During an extremely confusing QTE, an enemy sniper holds an SV-98.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SV98.jpg|thumb|none|600px|SV-98 fitted with the unnamed 12x scope, without a bipod.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire. In the campaign, Blackburn uses one during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine;&amp;quot; here it has infinite ammunition. During the latter sequence, the Javelin is shown firing at absurdly short range; in real life it has a minimum range of around 250 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Harassed by tanks during &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn comes across his salvation in the form of an FGM-148 Javelin launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Javelin-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds the Javelin. Note the help text misidentifies it as a SMAW.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Stinger-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Finding himself under attack from an Su-25 &amp;quot;Frogfoot&amp;quot; ground-attack plane, Blackburn searches the wreckage of an M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV. Thankfully, the Stinger is apparently made of stronger stuff than the light vehicle which exploded with it inside. The weapon resting on its unfolded tracking antenna cannot be good for the launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned. It is still identified as an M320 in the kill feed. It is also correctly depicted firing VOG-25 caseless rounds, as the launcher is not flicked downwards to eject the spent casing as is common in first person shooters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn holds a standalone M320 at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine.&amp;quot; This appears to be randomly dropped by US infantry in this area.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|As usual for an FPS protagonist, Blackburn is of the &amp;quot;pick a random notch and use it like a regular iron sight&amp;quot; school of leaf sight use.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Reloading the standalone M320; note the front grip visible and the fire selector always set to safe.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M320-4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn reloads the M320 mounted under his HK416. Note that here he is removing the &amp;quot;spent&amp;quot; round; there appears to only be one grenade round model, so the fired round is shown unfired.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines and is equipped with a vertical foregrip. The AT4 will only appear in the Singleplayer campaign. It is incorrectly referred to as an &amp;quot;RPG&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an AT4 as the squad try to take out a sniper hidden in a hotel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-2.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The results are fairly predictable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AT4-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Throughout the campaign, Matkovic carries an AT4 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M224 Mortar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of &amp;quot;Operation Guillotine,&amp;quot; Blackburn is tasked with briefly carrying an [[M224 Mortar]] as he advances with his fellow Marines; here it cannot be used by the player, and is used by NPCs to fire illumination rounds during the night-time mission. In multiplayer it can be used by the Support class; the M224 in multiplayer has infinite ammunition and can fire smoke or HE rounds. In singleplayer, it is shown with no baseplate fitted, which would make it practically impossible to actually use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M224-60mm-mortar.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M224 Mortar - 60mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M224-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks at the set-up M224, wondering when he can have a go.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SMAW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mk 153 Mod 0 in Multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] is featured as the Russian Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-RPG7-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Practically invisible in his well-planned cover position, an Iranian soldier with an RPG-7 plots his next move.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rrt877 rpg reloading.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Grouse]] (Russian: 9K38 Igla) appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. As in the previous ''Battlefield'' games it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|The SA-18's in-game render, oddly enough, is an [[SA-7 Grail]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 SA18 Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an SA-18 in multiplayer as he wonders whether a checkpoint office counts as a vehicle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== GL1 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The F2000's GL1 appears on the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the F2000, mounted to the rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== M203 ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M203]] appears on three Dog Tags. The first is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the M320/GP-30 where it appears not mounted to anything, the second is the Dog Tag awarded for 500 kills with the M320/GP-30, where it appears mounted to an M16A1, and the third is the Dog Tag awarded for 100 kills with the HK416, mounted to the rifle, just like it was in the ''Bad Company'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineer kit. In Multiplayer mines that are placed can only be destroyed with explosives, shooting them has no effect. The mine is pressure activated, meaning only something heavy like a vehicle will set it off, infantry running across will not detonate it. Shooting the mine also has no effect.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3 ATMine Multi.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player character holds an M15 anti-tank mine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M67 hand grenade]] is the primary grenade seen in ''Battlefield 3'', used by all factions. Instead of a grenade indicator, the body of the grenade flashes to make it more easily visible. Three grenades are carried in singleplayer. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip two by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization. There are two ways to throw grenades; either using a hotkey or by selecting the grenade as a weapon. The hotkey tosses the grenade instantly then switches back to the previously equipped weapon. Selecting the grenade manually allows multiple grenades to be thrown one after the other, and also allows the pin to be pulled and the grenade prepared for tossing - though as the spoon is held down, this does not actually &amp;quot;cook&amp;quot; the grenade's fuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M67-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn readies an M67 grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M84 stun grenade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blackburn uses an [[M84 stun grenade]] to disorient a group of PLR fighters at the bottom of an elevator shaft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M84stun.jpg|thumb|none|M84 stun grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn, after managing not to fall to his death while rappelling down an elevator, readies an M84 &amp;quot;flashbang&amp;quot; grenade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Flashbang-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn throws the grenade. This frame and the next both show that, in common with many modern shooters, the thrown model is the same as the &amp;quot;in world&amp;quot; model for this grenade and so the safety lever is still attached.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Mounted Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AT-14 Spriggan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AT-14 Spriggan]] appears in the game as the Russian counter to the American BGM-71 TOW mentioned below, and is also a secondary weapon on the BMP-2M APC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT14-Spriggan.JPG|thumb|none|400px|AT-14 Spriggan launcher and missile - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BGM-71 TOW ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BGM-71 TOW]] appears in the game as an emplaced anti-tank missile launcher for the US faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tow 07.jpg|thumb|none|400px|BGM-71 TOW on M220 tripod - 152mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. In terms of gameplay, the M2HB behaves more like a medium machine gun, requiring three or four shots to kill infantry, and dozens to disable a vehicle. In multiplayer, M1 tanks can be fitted with an M2HB mounted above the main cannon. When mounted like this, the M2's rate of fire slows to about 400rpm but gains a damage bonus that puts its power more in line with its real life counterpart. These changes were likely made to keep heavy machine guns from being overly powerful compared to other weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|At the end of &amp;quot;Uprising,&amp;quot; Blackburn takes control of an M2HB mounted on a Humvee as he defends a landing zone until a V-22 Osprey can extract the scattered Marines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Near the end of &amp;quot;Thunder Run,&amp;quot; Sergeant Jonathan Miller mans his tank's .50 cal. It seems in the game's fiction the US Marine Corps has upgraded their Abrams tanks, since Anvil 3 is an M1A2, currently used only by the US Army. Note the TUSK gunshields for the missing loader's M240 are instead fitted to the M2.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M2-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A M2HB mounted on M1161 &amp;quot;Growler&amp;quot; ITV.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DShK heavy machine gun (mounting) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mountings for the [[DShK heavy machine gun]] can be seen on Iranian Type-72Z main battle tanks, modernised versions of the Russian T-55. These tanks seem to have been modelled from museum display vehicles, since the gun itself is missing from the mounting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DShKM-vehicle-mount.jpg|thumb|none|400px|DShKM heavy machine gun in standard vehicle mounting on a Romanian TR-85 main battle tank - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-DShK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|An Iranian Type-72Z shows off the DShK it conspiciously does not have. Note the border at the edge of the screenshot is authentic, intended to display the edge of the Abrams' display screen as the vehicle moves around.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|400px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Jennifer Hawkins looks out at an A-10 Thunderbolt II armed with a GAU-8 during the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Later in the mission Hawkins gets to call in gun runs from the A-10, here shown on thermal.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds in both single and multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|400px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M134-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An AH-6 &amp;quot;Little Bird&amp;quot; opens fire with its M134 minigun. Note that tracers are treated as solid by the engine, meaning the underside of what should be a bright light source is shown in shadow here. This is only really visible in stills.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Dynamics GAU-17/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two [[M134_Minigun#General_Dynamics_GAU-17.2FA|GAU-17/A miniguns]] are mounted on the sides of UH-1Y helicopters. More strangely, two are mounted on the windows of Kaffarov's Ka-60 Kasatka helicopter in the singleplayer campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-17A HH60.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-17/A, US Air Force version of the M134 Minigun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU17-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-17/A can be seen mounted on Kaffarov's private helicopter as Dmitri Mayakovsky dangles from it. Note it has no ammo feed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30#GSh-30-1|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSH30 1.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 with ammo belt 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|During the mission &amp;quot;Going Hunting,&amp;quot; Hawkins faces several Su-35BM Flanker-E aircraft, incorrectly referred to throughout as &amp;quot;MiGs.&amp;quot; This error is only present in the text in this mission; they are correctly named elsewhere in the game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Chased by ''Shark 4-6'', one Su-35BM decides to show off with Pugachev's Cobra manoeuvre...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-MiG-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|...giving Hawkins a nice look at its missile armament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the Su-25TM (Su-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Su-39 Frogfoot ground attack aircraft flies over as Blackburn finds himself between Iraq and a hard place.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Frogfoot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|It soon returns for a series of gun runs as Blackburn has to move from cover to cover to find a Stinger. The Frogfoot here is basically firing a death ray with a deadzone around pieces of cover; moving out of cover is instant death during the time that counts as its attack even if it has already flown overhead and stopped firing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, Russian army buggies and Vodniks, and a number of technicals. It behaves very similarly to the [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]]: more in line with a medium machine gun, and can be mounted on a T-90 with a lowered rate of fire but higher shot-for-shot damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|401px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over a Kord machine gun mounted on a technical.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-1.jpg|thumb|none|602px|He soon discovers the hard way that manning a Kord during an earthquake is a bad idea.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Kord-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|A T-90 MBT opens fire with its main gun, the massive muzzle flash illuminating the Commander's Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets. M61s are also seen in Phalanx installations on American warships, and in multiplayer the US base is protected by a land-based Phalanx C-RAM installation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Phalanx.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Phalanx CIWS - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:C-RAM_3.JPG|thumb|none|401px|Land-based Phalanx C-RAM mounting on a mobile trailer - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-2.jpg|thumb|none|601px|In the mission &amp;quot;Gone Hunting&amp;quot; the player character is Lieutenant Jennifer Hawkins, WSO of an F/A-18F &amp;quot;Super Hornet&amp;quot; callsign ''Shark 4-6'' assigned to CVN-77 USS ''George H.W. Bush''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Phalanx-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Hawkins climbs up to the deck of the USS ''George H.W. Bush'', spotting the USS ''Ford'' (FFG-54), an ''Oliver Hazard Perry''-class frigate in the distance. This incorrectly mounts bow and stern Phalanx installations; while a future block upgrade is planned to add a forward gun over the removed SM-1 missile launcher of nine of the ''Perry''-class, this will be a Mk 38 Mod 2 (a remote-controlled navalised [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]]), not a second Phalanx.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M61-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|The two Hornets ''Shark 4-2'' and ''Shark 4-6'' overfly the US fleet, giving plenty of glimpses of Phalanx installations on the various ships.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-C-RAM.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A close up look at a land-based Phalanx C-RAM in multiplayer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper attack helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Miller looks up at a friendly AH-1Z Viper during the mission &amp;quot;Thunder Run.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M197 Vulcan-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A closer look at an AH-1Z Viper's M197 Vulcan cannon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-12/U ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-12/U|GAU-12/U]] is the main gun on the LAV-AD in multiplayer. It should be noted that the LAV-AD itself is technically anachronistic as it has been removed from service.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|400px|General Dynamics GAU-12/U with unfired rounds - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-GAU-12U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A GAU-12/U mounted on an LAV-AD.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GAU-22/A ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Dynamics GAU-12/U#GAU-22/A|GAU-22/A]] appears in the game as the secondary weapon of F-35B Lightning II aircraft on some multiplayer maps, such as the revamped version of Gulf of Oman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:F-35 GAU-22A.jpg|thumb|none|400px|GAU-22/A - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-M240C-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller runs back towards the tank column after retrieving the &amp;quot;clicker&amp;quot; trigger for an M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M242 Bushmaster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn and his fellow Marines get out of their own LAV-25 and look over someone else's at the start of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-LAV-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Blackburn looks over another LAV-25 during the mission &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees and AAVP7A1 amphibious transports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Mk19-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller looks over an AAVP7A1, mounting an M2HB and a Mark 19 grenade launcher in the commander's mini-turret.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is coaxially mounted on the T-90A and T-72 MBTs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|400px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-T72-1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Miller gets a little ''too'' close to an Iranian T-72. The coaxial gun on the T-72 is mounted to the right of the main gun; the view is blocked from most angles (including this one) by the searchlight mounted next to it.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2M and BTR-90 APCs, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Shipunov-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|Blackburn advances on a BMP-2M during &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; the IFV seemingly oblivious to his dastardly rocket-launching ambitions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=532119</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=532119"/>
		<updated>2012-03-14T06:56:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* 3 Expansions planned for BF3 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Just about everything in the military has a designation. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:10, 10 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx 3 Expansions planned for BF3]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me being the AR fanboy that I am, I just want a short barreled AR (10 inches prefferably). cheech98 9:28, 7 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HK416. I'd like to see another pump shotty and some pistols at the least. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:49, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Already spoken for; the M416 is the 10&amp;quot; 416.[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 18:16, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a pump shotgun, maybe an Ithica or a Mossberg with wood furniture (because with black furniture it would look too much like the 870). I would like to see an AK in 7.62x39. I was honestly appalled that BF3 didn't feature a .30 cal AK. An MP5, a Hi-Power, a CZ-75 and a SIG-Sauer would also be nice; a non-tacticool FAL, maybe an FNC (always loved that gun), a Skorpion (come on, who doesn't wanna shoot that thing in a video game), the VZ-58, the HK P7 perhaps? The HK33 would be an awesome weapon to see (although admittedly not too plausible), an Uzi (full size or mini, doesn't really matter to me), a Makarov (still common among the Russian Armed Forces, right?), the P99, and MORE REVOLVERS, DAMMIT. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 02:04, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I think if they added the FAL, it wouldn't be tacticool, seeing as how the G3A3 wasn't.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 1:32, 11 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rumours are circulating that two such weapons in Close Quarters Pack are the CZ-75 Automatic is one such pistol as a competition towards the G18 and 93R and a new sniper rifle, the CZ-750 for the Recon. Also two new vehicles rumored are the UH-60 Blackhawk and M2A2 Bradley IFV. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:07, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But isn't the CQ Pack gonna take place entirely indoors? I'm pretty sure it said somewhere that the four maps in the next pack are going to feture entirely infantry-based, indoors combat. I guess I could see a helicopter working in there somewhere (thinking of the Airport map's chopper-gunners on MW2, I suppose) but it seems like vehicles would break the tense, room-to-room air they're going for here. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 3:56, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HK33 is actually in the game already, in the Back to Karkand expansion pack as the 'G53' or something like that. *EDIT* Nevermind, you meant the full size rifle, my mistake...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's gonna be a bunch of CQB guns, no doubt. I'd like to see (Assault Rifles) Tavor TAR-21 and the Masada. (Carbines) AKMs and the AUG A3. (Machine Guns) LSAT and the IMI Negev (Snipers) VSS Vintorez and the DSR-1 (Submachine Guns)MP5 PDW and the Colt R0991 9mm. --[[User:Commander Lukas|Commander Lukas]] 16:28, 8 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year, I think we are going to have our hands full identifying all them because it ain't just firearms either, they're adding a slew of vehicles with each pack as is the norm with this supposed DLC's. &amp;quot;Close quarters&amp;quot; I think is mostly gonna be all transport vehicles so I suspect, possibly Technicals, Civilian Vehicles, maybe an aerial transport helicopter/plane or light attack scout helicopters, possibly light IFV's too. Weapons are likely to be CQB in nature, I'm hoping for alot of Sub-Machine Gun's and Shotguns, the game needs more Pump Shotguns in my opinion. My general wish-list includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SA58 OSW Battle Rifle and Type 95 Assault Rifle (to round out the Chinese Firepower in BF3, almost the full collection now) for the Assault Kit&lt;br /&gt;
* Zastava M92 (Compact AK47 Variant) and the Mark 18 Mod 0 (Ultra compact AR) and possibly the QLZ-87 Automatic Grenade Launcher (as an Anti-Vehicle Weapon, replaces the Rocket Launcher) for the Engineer&lt;br /&gt;
* MG3 GPMG and L86A2 (Equivalent to BF3's RPK and M27, gotta have more weapons like those for the Support Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark 12 SPR (American equivalent of the SKS in BF3) and CZ-750 for the Recon&lt;br /&gt;
* CZ-75 Auto, H&amp;amp;K MP5, Mossberg 590 Pump Shotgun (if it was a secondary for the Assault I'd be in love with it), TOZ-194, Valtro PM-5, Sawn Off Double Barrel, Benelli M3 Super 90, Smith &amp;amp; Wesson 686, SIG P226, H&amp;amp;K USP, QSZ-92 and FN Five SeveN are just some examples of all kit weapons I'd love to see. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 10:56, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If they added the QLZ-87, it would be '''''WAY''''' overpowered.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 7:28, 12 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dunno about the QLZ-87, man. I'd think most Battlefield players are already sick of overpowered, hand-held weapons that can auto-fire frags. [[User:Sopher|Sopher]] 4:03, 13 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There's gonna be AT least 30 weapons or more tops in each of the three packs over a period of this year&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty weapons in each pack? Are you kidding me? BtK had eight weapons. And how do you know all the packs will have weapons in?[[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 12:37, 9 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, BtK had ten weapons, and he meant at least 30 overall, he just stated it wrong.  [[User:Jeddostotle7|Jeddostotle7]] 3:28, 9 March 2012 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They just released a new trailer that shows off some of the weapons in the first expansion pack, I only saw two but there may be more hidden throughout, the ones I saw were the L86A1 and the ACR(I assume it was the ACR, it was however called &amp;quot;ACW-R&amp;quot;, I'm seeing a trend with Magpul weapons here with the PDR being renamed the PDW-R. (PS. sorry if I screwed up the formatting, this is my first entry.)&lt;br /&gt;
After further searching the complete list seems to be AUG, SPAS-12, ACW-R(ACR), L86A1 LSW, LSAT, MTAR-21, SCAR-L. However some people claim to have spotted the CZ-75 Auto. [[User:Spry|Spry]] 12:38, 13 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch Spry, I watched the trailer twice carefully and found the same. I'll make it a list so it's easier to see. As with Karkand we should avoid adding anything new to the main page until we have more to add. I'm assuming the same weapon layout as Karkand until I hear something solid about that full auto CZ-75, maybe it has a stock and is a PDW? I'm also assuming what go to what classes, can't really go wrong there. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:47, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: ACW-R (ACR)&lt;br /&gt;
*Assault: AUG (variant unknown)&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: MTAR-21&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer: SCARL-L (misspelling, tweeted Demize)&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: L86A1&lt;br /&gt;
*Support: LSAT&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon: ???&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: ??? (SMG)&lt;br /&gt;
*All Kit: SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm excited to see the AUG and the MTAR, but the ACR and SCAR-L... while I have nothing against them (in fact, I really like them) aren't they a bit... implausible? As for the LSAT... HELL. NO. [[User:ManchurianCandidate|ManchurianCandidate]] 19:15, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure if this is on the up and up, but people are talking about the Recon weapons being the HK417 and the CZ-750 (these are were supposedly found buried in some code in a leaked beta build), and with both of these weapons having an effective range of about a thousand meters, this seems plausible. However others are claiming there will be no Recon weapons in this expansion, which seems like it would a stupid move on DICE's part. In addition people are saying the ACR will be a carbine with a 25+1 capacity, and that the SCAR-L will be the assault rifle weapon (seems odd to have a the 7.62 variant as a carbine and the 5.56 variant as an assault rifle, but oh well). Others say the second All Kit weapon will be something called an M5K? I'm not sure what that is. Again none of this was shown in the trailer, however some people claim to have seen the CZ-750 in the trailer, but it's such a poor view that it could just as well be the SV-98. Also, BF3 fans work fast, someone made these mock ups of the stats screens for the guns: http://imgur.com/a/iOlAQ [[User:Spry|Spry]] 03:08, 14 March 2012 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An M203A2 would be a nice addition, since the Marines don't use the M320. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:12, 13 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this belonged here, since we're on the subject of expansions, here's a HUGE list of updates in this upcoming patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654779195992365/ [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 01:56, 14 March 2012 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=529657</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=529657"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T00:21:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* 3 Expansions planned for BF3 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Can someone fix that link please? I'm not very good at this clearly.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=529655</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=529655"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T00:20:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* 3 Expansions planned for BF3 */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cod always screws up the guns&lt;br /&gt;
:What does that have to do with Battlefield 3? [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:12, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Xbox still has the old AN 94 and M416 fire modes. Also if you use the AN 94 with iron sights and swap back and forth between your pistol, the front sight disappears on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:30, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That change is in the next patch we're supposed to get, it takes longer for consoles. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:54, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any idea of when that is? I just started using the AN 94 and love the two round burst but I'm hindered at long range because of the recoil and rate of fire.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:05, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No idea, it has to go through certification from MS/Sony and usually takes 2-3 weeks. Ish. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:51, 26 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha, is there any other? -- Long Fallen 01:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9K22 Tunguska ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've actually just realized that while the page is mostly (half) complete, the 9K22 Tunguska's armaments haven't been added to the page; because I'd like to know exactly how much ammunition for its guns it carries and approximately for how long would it waste it all before running out, since it's a mobile AA platform? -- Long Fallen 01:36, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ammunition capacity is 1,904, combined rate of fire is variable between 3,900 and 5,000 rounds per minute, so if we take the lower rate of fire this works out to about 30 seconds of continuous firing.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:45, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:2a38m.jpg|thumb|none|400px|2A38M Autocannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Example image in case anyone feels like adding. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:36, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added a piece of info about the M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's really inaccurate for even a shotgun. I've patterned my shotgun in real life which also has a cylinder bore and the pattern was half the size of the pattern in game. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:46, 20 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This &amp;quot;short-range shotgun&amp;quot; problem is sadly common in video games, to the point which the TVTropes website has a page just for it. And Frag-12 rounds for the shotguns in this game are horribly overpowered too. I'd take a tighter pattern with a realistic damage-drop-off with distance with buckshot if they could tone down the Frag-12 rounds. For a more realistic shotgun, try playing SWAT 4. You can actually snipe somewhat well with a Benelli Nova in that game if you crouch and wait to become fully accurate.--[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 20:55, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SWAT4... It's the same game that also has handgun sniping and guns that do less damage at point blank range. I was disappointed with the 1911 in that game sadly. :( I'd be careful advising anyone to play that game; its mechanics are ungodly finicky. -- Long Fallen 22:23, 21 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You could snipe with handguns in Battlefield 2 too... That was actually a tactic employed by experienced BF2 snipers: shoot the enemy with bolt-action sniper rifle and then immediately switch to pistol and finish him off ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:20, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, SWAT 4 isn't as finicky with its mechanics if you know what you're doing. The damage with its guns is somewhat random to reflect how bullets in real life don't always perform as expected (i.e., JHPs clog with clothing and fail to expand, 5.56mm FMJ fails to fragment once inside a target if the bullet isn't properly constructed or the barrel it's fired from is too short, etc.). though I will admit that the M1911 and other .45 ACP guns are underpowered in that game. But I think the reason as to why &amp;quot;handgun sniping&amp;quot; has persisted up until now is that modelling ballistic physics for bullets en masse was only possible when the right programming and hardware appeared. The BF2 example was probably implemented as well given the limited draw distance of the engine; without an omnipresent zoom system to represent how your eyes can focus on far-off objects (like in ARMA 2) the limitations of pixels on our monitors means that enemies become unrecognizable jumbles of pixels at distances we would still be able to clearly see them in real life. Also, because adjustable sights are hard to model in games (as opposed to scopes with ballistic drop markings), pistols often don't have ballistic drop either. I tried compensating for ballistic drop while shooting pistols in the STALKER series--because the iron sights on pistols can't be adjusted it's very difficult, since essentially the muzzle will obscure your target when you aim high to compensate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But the sooner we get realistic shotgun buckshot spreads and ranges in games, the better. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 14:02, 22 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem is, the zoom system only activates when you press a button. So any time you don't, the environment is presented in its distant form. This gives an edge to the person who secured a position and now zooms in in the enemy direction, while the enemy is on the move and can't see said person. In reality, they should see each other evenly. I like this absence of bionic eyes in [[Project Reality]]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:26, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So you have to hold down the button in ARMA2 to focus on distant objects? Well, a toggle system would be much better (probably combined with using a &amp;quot;dynamic zoom&amp;quot; system that used your mouse wheel or two keys to zoom in and out so you could vary the amount of zoom much like your eyes can focus across a great deal of ranges). Still, given the pixellation problem that I mentioned earlier, all PCs in Project Reality have to carry binoculars so as to focus on distant targets, but these cannot be combined with weaponry, so if you're using a kit that has no optics for your gun and are trying to hit something that you can't really see unmagnified (even though in real life you would be able to see and hit a target at that distance), tough luck. Project Reality is also going in the process of making a version based on the ARMA2 engine as well. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 18:17, 23 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Adjustable Zoom would be nice. Sadly, developers haven't yet caught the idea. Even adjustable FOV is not in every modern shooter (and where it is, it might be limited).&lt;br /&gt;
::It works both ways in PR: you have problems seeing an enemy in the distance and an enemy has problems seeing you ;) And yes, I'm aware of PR for ArmA II. [http://www.moddb.com/mods/project-reality-arma2 It's currently v0.1], right at the starting line. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:47, 24 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 magazine tube length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone explain to me what's going on with the magazine tube length of the M1014 in-game? The weapon art models show the typical length, but in-game, the magazine length looks like a M3. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 13:12, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pump action shotguns in the game start with four round mag tubes. Therefore the art models depict them as such. However, when you unlock &amp;quot;Extended Magazines&amp;quot;, the in world model changes to the six round tube for both the Remington and the Benelli.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 16:18, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Didn't think of that. Thank you. --[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 17:03, 27 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== UMP trigger group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the world model for the H&amp;amp;K UMP has safe, semi-auto, and full auto, even though the in-game weapon operates with a selectable 2-round burst.--[[User:Baztian|Baztian]] 14:53, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's true than it is an error, though the UMP ''can'' have a full/2/semi/safe trigger group. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:32, 28 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I've been playing B2K a lot, and I've gathered a bunch of trivia about some of the guns that could be added to the page, but I'm not so knowledgable about them so I thought I'd leave them here so someone who knows more can add them into the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The L85A2 has three round burst as well as auto and semi, which as far as I know it doesn't in real life. It also can't mount the M320 which, again as far as I know, is the grenade launcher it mounts in real life. It's also 'cocked' by pressing a bolt release just above the magwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FAMAS also has burst as well as semi and auto, again I don't know if this is true in real life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B and burst as well as automatic and semi, but I'll admit I know nothing about these weapons. The QBZ-95B and the QBU-88 are reloaded similarly to the AN94/AEK-971 (new mag is used to push the mag release and then inserted) and it looks absolutely bizarre in first person because they're bullpup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the QBB-95 and the QBZ-95B are chambered in 5.45x39mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm and the QBU-88 is chambered in 7.62x54mm under the info screen rather than 5.8x42mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all I've got  [[User:Nikonov|Nikonov]] 18:17, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The FAMAS does have all three, and a lot of the info screens are wrong or somewhat wrong, pretty sure they're just copy-pasting errors as opposed to them not knowing the calibre. Everything else you said is correct as far as I know. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:34, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, if they are copy-pasting errors then someone should tweet Demize about it ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:10, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The reload animation for those Chinese rifles doesn't use the magazine to push the old mag out. The character pulls out a new mag and pulls the old one out with just his fingers but has the magazine in hand to load into the gun right after. I saw a video of it with an AK once.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:49, 9 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm assuming DICE watched this video, I don't have a clue if this is what they teach in the PLA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMmaIZ8Umnk--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:40, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL L85A2 mounts not [http://www.hk-usa.com/-images/products/m320/lg_m320_3.jpg M320] but a different variant of AG36, called [http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/Black_Hawk_169/DSC00005.jpg UGL]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:07, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just Tweeted Demize about the calibre and ROFs being sometimes wrong for the BTK guns. :) Also, he says he's not going to add the HK79 and GL1 due to memory issues, which is fair. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:16, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That would make a nice &amp;quot;GL Pack&amp;quot; DLC though: GL1, HK79, M203, UGL... And more, should the carbines get corresponding rifle variants :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:20, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also interesting, the QBZ-95's ironsights glitch when you fire. Actually helps. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 19:23, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter, could someone suggest something small on the HUD on hardcore modes that show what fire mode your gun is set to? I change it a lot and the guns with three settings make it difficult.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:43, 10 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, and Tweeted :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:56, 11 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would be kind of cool if in hardcore mode you could actually look down at your weapon and see the fire selector or check how many rounds are in the magazine. If you think having no HUD is &amp;quot;hardcore,&amp;quot; just imagine having to actually worry about taking your eyes off the battleground long enough to check on your weapon like that. [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:14, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pancor Jackhammer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why? Not only is this weapon relatively pointless since they included the USAS-12 (it seems to recoil less and that's about it) but it comes with a freaking suppressor. Of all the useless devices you can equip to a weapon as insanely loud as the Jackhammer theoretically would be, this and an under-barrel can opener would just about top the list. (I presume they put it on there because the revolving magazine system of the Jackhammer has some  similarities to that of a Nagant M1895.) Also, why in the hell is the freaking thing even in the game? There's supposedly a grand total of two of the dumb things in existence. If we're going to throw in an automatic shotgun prototype that never made it into production, how about the H&amp;amp;K CAWS? That one was actually tested by the US military. In another world, it could have been adopted. Or, hell, the Atchisson AA-12. Don't get me wrong, the Jackhammer is a cool looking gun, but it never made it off the design bench and I'm a ''little'' tired of seeing it crop up in video games claiming at least some level of real world veracity (the world &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; is a silly one to use for FPS games). [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 03:24, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's supposed to be for the nostalgia, I guess, since it was an unlockable in BF2. Much like them keeping that &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; name for the Protecta, though it's now a Street Sweeper. There were actually quite a few Jackhammer prototypes, but only two that fired fullauto. Or rather didn't, which is why there were only two. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:38, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They will put XM8 as military tested weapon, methinks. CAWS was pretty cool gun in [[Jagged Alliance 2]] :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:52, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As stated, it's in because it was in BF2, that's the point of the Back To Karkand pack. Also, it doesn't actually have a suppressor. Well, it does, but it's invisible and does not change any stats whatsoever, not even making you not appear on the minimap. So, there's just a pretend option for a suppressor. Why? Same reason the two ARs, two Carbines, and two MGs have 12x scopes, and the two Sniper Rifles have Flash Suppressors: it was an oversight, those are the attachments you're supposed to ''never'' get those attachments, only DICE gets them, because they're silly. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:10, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the suppressor actually does do something, it cuts damage down. I actually like the Pancor though, with frag rounds, ext mags, and a Holo sight I can clear out most hallways on metro. But, that is pretty much the only map it is of any use on.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 16:47, 22 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh geez, way for me to miss the obvious. I forgot about it being in BF2, having not played the &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; games in quite a while. (Why does 2005 seem so long ago?) Actually, I was a little sad that B2K didn't include the option to hijack semi-trucks and civilian cars like you could with the Armored Fury booster pack. At least you can borrow a Bobcat on Wake Island and try to run enemy soldiers down with it for nothing other than sheer comedy value... And the other &amp;quot;weird&amp;quot; attachments (okay, maybe not the flash suppressor) are at least ''sort of'' useful. You can be extremely annoying with the MG36 fitted with a 12x - no sniper likes dodging nearly-accurate long range machine gun fire, and anything that snipers don't like is fine with me.  [[User:Atypicaloracle|Atypicaloracle]] 04:26, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dog Tag Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I vote we add a section either at the bottom of the page for all of them, or at the end of each class of weapons for them, because there are a LOT of guns on dog tags that aren't actually in the game. (SAA, SCAR-L, proper MG36, standard FAMAS, that weird suppressed Makarov PM variant, M203, and lots more) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If no one objects to this, I'm going to create a sub-catagory at the bottom of each weapon class (SMG, shotgun, etc) that has all the Dog Tag-only weapons, because this page will get very confusing if we don't, as none of those weapons are in the game, just pictures of them. So far (of the top of my head) Makarov PB, Single Action Army, M1911A1, SPAS-12, SCAR-L, FAMAS (standard), M203, M16A2, M16A1, MG36 (proper). I'm sure there are more, but that's what I can think of right now. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:45, 4 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've added everything I know of, but there are probably more. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:46, 8 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Patch is still yet to reach Xbox it appears ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears as though the Xbox has been forgotten since the AN 94 still just has two fire modes and the HK416 still has it's three fire modes. Does anyone know more about it than me? --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:59, 17 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we never got that patch that the other two platforms did. I'm assuming it'll be rolled into the patch that was originally supposed to come out for all platforms this month, but is now going to be in March at the earliest. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:57, 18 February 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, here on the PS3 it's still the same, three-mode HK416 and two-mode AN94. DICE has gone on to say that across all consoles the stats are very different; however, the next patch will put all weapons on equal ground across all platforms. -- Long Fallen 02:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Fancy Right Side Dog Tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to add this to the page soon, to replace the Dog Tag Weapons sections I made before, but right now I need sleep. They're sorted by the name of the real weapon in game, not in game name and not name of weapon in the picture, if those are different. If any of you can figure out what the not-actually-a-QBB-95 is, let me know :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3_500KillGuns.jpg|thumb|none|650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have no idea how grateful I am to see this in a neat compilation! Been looking everywhere for just these designs to no avail. -- Long Fallen 02:46, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the QBB-95 is a totally made up frankengun. However the core of it is actually an Enfield L85, you can tell by the vent holes on the receiver: 3 horizontal vents at the rear, then a slightly larger gap followed by two slightly smaller vents. Also visible is the raised portion on the bottom edge of the upper receiver which runs horizontally under these vent holes, and the pistol grip and trigger guard seem to match. On top it seems to be a grossly oversized M4/M16A4 detachable carry handle, and the front is anyone's guess.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:56, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I think you're right. It also has the generic bipod most guns in BF3 use, Harris Bipod I think it's called. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:45, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flash Suppresor ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know this is really not important and probably no one cares, but I think the flash suppresor may be a Vltor VC-1. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 17:15, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You found it! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:28, 1 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not important? Any info is very welcome on this site! In fact, I was wondering this myself. -- Long Fallen 02:48, 2 March 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3 Expansions planned for BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2012/03/07/battlefield-3-close-quarters-announced.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Newest expansion has 10 new guns, what are you guys thinking/hoping they will be? I'm hoping for a USP, perhaps another pump action shotgun,maybe a TAR or a Galil, and an XM8 (wishful thinking on that last one, but they put the Jackhammer in, so why not?) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:20, 7 March 2012 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=498682</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=498682"/>
		<updated>2011-12-20T04:49:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Javelins are the best. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had assumed that DICE didn't get the rights to use &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; because in the description for all other HK guns they are referred to as &amp;quot;made by a German weapons manufacturer&amp;quot;. Strange that PS3 uses the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot;.--[[User:--JazzBlackBelt--|--JazzBlackBelt--]] 12:44, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my, sounds like tracer darting in BC2 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:56, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And CITV Station + MBT Guided Shells! Lock, fire, triple kill on one Little Bird! Lock, fire, quad on the other. I was 7/0 20 seconds into the game! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:14, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's even better against a jet. I just try to imagine the expression on a pilot's face as he wonders how the hell an Abrams just shot down his Flanker. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Javelins may be the best, however, setting up the SOFLAM is akin to setting yourself up with giant neon lights pointing &amp;quot;I'M RIGHT HERE!&amp;quot; to the enemies. I'm sure DICE had good intentions when programming it so that it wouldn't be ridiculously common and spammy, but it just sort of defeats the point of giving it to the stealthy ninja that the Recon class should be. Not to mention it gets even less useful on Wake Island with the mobile AA guns shooting the bright red light visible from just about any distance with the fury of a thousand angry Russians armed with PPSh's. :/ -- Long Fallen 22:32, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, the Tunguska, which has the ability of firing every bullet ever made at the same time?[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:49, 19 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497943</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497943"/>
		<updated>2011-12-18T08:22:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Javelins are the best. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497942</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497942"/>
		<updated>2011-12-18T08:22:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Javelins are the best. */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497941</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497941"/>
		<updated>2011-12-18T08:22:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Javelins are the best. */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::DICE-only? Cheating Campers &amp;gt;:O&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 and QBZ-95B with ballistic scope - would be funny to see :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, things like single reload animation, no +1 round in the chamber, fixed firing mode, hitscan, etc. are usually the result of engine limitations. In this regard we can see that [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite-2 Frostbite 2 Engine] is more advanced than [http://www.moddb.com/engines/frostbite Frostbite 1 Engine] (which already had bullet physics; although magcount and overheating from [http://www.moddb.com/engines/refractor-2 Refractor 2 Engine] are absent; it would have also been nice if there were interchangeable magazines). Regarding the equipment it shows how much there [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch didn't do the research] and [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShownTheirWork shown their work]. Me wants [[Project Reality]] for BF3 :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not saying that it isn't realistic in some specific areas, sure it is, but it's a video game, and to compare it to COD and say BF is more realistic is kind of like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars and saying Star Trek is more realistic because they used the word &amp;quot;tachyon&amp;quot;. That being said, I think all four examples I just used are very evertaining. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 04:56, 16 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Javelins are the best. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javelin + CITV station on a tank = fantastic combination. The top down fire mode makes killing LAVs and Amtraks, especially on Noshair (sp?) Canals easy, not to mention the massively amusing ability to fire on laser painted aircraft. It's always hilarious to watch an FA/18 blow up and the guy flying just sees FGM-148 Javelin killed him and he wonders what just happened. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 02:22, 18 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Heckler_%26_Koch_USP&amp;diff=497869</id>
		<title>Talk:Heckler &amp; Koch USP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Heckler_%26_Koch_USP&amp;diff=497869"/>
		<updated>2011-12-18T04:00:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Who uses HK USP? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Additional Variants==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:IMFDB 22 Jack Bauer Live Firing HK USP Compact.jpg|thumb|none|500px|'''World IMFDB Exclusive:''' Screen-used live firing Heckler &amp;amp; Koch USP Compact. This weapon is verified as screen used from the series '''24.''' The gun was used in numerous scenes throughout Seasons 3 through 8 of the series. IMFDB thanks [http://www.thegoldencloset.com/ The Golden Closet] for providing this photo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ExDeUSP.jpg|none|thumb|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch USP .45 ACP mocked up to resemble a [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch Mark 23]], with a Knight's Armament UTL (Universal Tactical Light, designed for the USP) and fake Knight's Armament suppressor, used by [[Kurt Russell]] in the film ''[[Executive Decision]]''. (Photo from Long Mountain Outfitters)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Blade2-2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Modified H&amp;amp;K USP Match  used by [[Wesley Snipes]] in the movies ''[[Blade II]]'' and ''[[Blade: Trinity]]'' - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hk-usp45c.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch USP Compact - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USPCompactSS.jpg|thumb|none|500px|H&amp;amp;K USP Compact with Stainless Slide - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a great, affordable, light, accurate, and reliable handgun. It has been my BUG for 9 years and I wouldn't have it any other way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but, &amp;quot;affordable&amp;quot;?  Surely you concede that a new USP costs more than any other polymer-framed service pistol on the market (and often more than some steel-framed pistols)? -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 14:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well yes the USP is expensive but the old fart has gotta point, it's a pretty awesome gun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without a doubt my favorite tactical handgun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My favorite is the Expert model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would buy a USP45 in a second if they did something about the trigger-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
--You CAN take it to a gunsmith and have the trigger cleaned up. You might try the Expert model or the Mark 23 if you want a better trigger. Heck, if you're going to go spend $1,500 to $2,000 on a gun, might as well get something you like. I honestly would rather spend that kind of money on a Les Baer or something, but the USP is good too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a question, is the USP Match just a regular USP with the compensator? Are there any othere differences? Is the compensator removable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has target sights, an adjustable trigger, and the barrel is extended. The compensator can be removed, but doing so leaves you with a rather awkward looking barrel. It also has the same rubber o-ring around the barrel that the Mk. 23 has.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 18:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the gun except it's got one squeeky ass trigger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The best two USP models are the Expert and the Mark 23. That's coming directly from my friends who have shot both in IDPA for years. The Expert and Mark 23 both have better, more cleaned up triggers compared to the base USP models. All of them are exceptionally accurate and reliable. The only compromise you have to make is in the wallet. They aren't cheap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has everything. Accurate, lightweight, high ammo capacity, virtually indestructible. But it's big (big grip - don't believe me - hold a Mark 23). And they are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny how its a $1,000 dollar gun yet has a horrible DA trigger pull. I would expect it from a Glock at $500 but a USP? Really?--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 03:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==LAPD service weapons==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it legal for LAPD to use USPs in real life or was it just made up for 24?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not an official issue weapon, at least according to Wikipedia. Only the Beretta 92, various S&amp;amp;W Automatics and Glocks. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 20:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for information, because it is a Wiki like IMFDB. --[[User:L.J. Gibbs|L.J. Gibbs]] 19:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I know for fact the LAPD does use the Beretta (I would think it's kinda common-knowledge, at least to us gun guys), and I have seen LAPD officers with a couple of different S&amp;amp;W autos. I also agree that the USP is not any official service weapon (or at least, I seriously doubt it is). [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 00:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LAPD also uses the Kimber TLE II 1911. (They call it the LAPD SWAT Custom). But detectives use this gun as well as LAPD SWAT teams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've never seen any LAPD officers with Glocks. Just about all of them have the Beretta 92FS because that's their standard issue sidearm. And the occasional old-timers with the 6-shooter .38 Specials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know of a single police department in the United States that uses H&amp;amp;K handguns. More or less because of the price. They do use H&amp;amp;K MP5s on SWAT teams. Although I see that phased out more and more in favor of the M4A1.&lt;br /&gt;
:The NJ State Police used HK P7's back in the 80's. I remember a state trooper came to my school to do a presentation, and he mentioned that unlike other pistols, you had to squeeze it to cock it. I don't remember if it was the P7M8 or P7M13, but according to HKpro, it was the P7M8. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:39, 14 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently H&amp;amp;K USP compacts and H&amp;amp;K P2000s are currently used by US Border Patrols. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LAPD is transitioning to Glock, Upland uses USP i believe, and USP is on the LASD approved carry list. [[User:Mercer|Mercer]] 04:07, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few that issue them.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 03:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maine State Police use the USP .45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Slide==&lt;br /&gt;
Does the USP have a stamped or milled slide? I've heard it both ways. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-It's CNC milled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Littlesoldier1|Littlesoldier1]] 02:24, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who uses HK USP? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the &amp;quot;Smokin' Aces&amp;quot; page,and there was a note,that FBI doesn't use USP.That is interesting to me.Why?&lt;br /&gt;
And,does somebody knows,who uses USP now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For one, the German Military. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_USP#Users Beyond that?] [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 14:22, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Maine State Police use USP45s. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:00, 17 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497210</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497210"/>
		<updated>2011-12-16T02:49:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die. Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:49, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497209</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497209"/>
		<updated>2011-12-16T02:48:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, some aspects of the game are unrealistic, but think about it though. Would you really want to play a game where you run out of ammo ever 5 minutes and have to run around and just wait to die or hope you knife someone to take his weapons, and then hope he too hasn't run out of ammo? Or would you want to have to go through a Gran Turismo-esque license course to be able to use every vehicle properly? While some things are clearly over-the-top, I won't argue with that, some things are obviously put in for the gameplay value, for enjoyment. IF the developers truly wanted a realistic game, they'd have the disc eject and destroy itself after you die.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the defibrillator comment reminded me of something my friend said, &amp;quot;Oh, you come back to life after getting hit directly with a tank shell! Oh here, let me revive this oatmeal!&amp;quot; [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:48, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497208</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497208"/>
		<updated>2011-12-16T02:34:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* HK53 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497205</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=497205"/>
		<updated>2011-12-16T02:30:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* HK53 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The USAS-12 has competition with the Jackhammer, I haven't unlocked it yet but I remember picking up a kit with the Jackhammer and it was like using a slightly lower capacity DAO-12 with it's 6+1 rounds but with automatic fire rate. This video shows some gameplay, extended mags give it 13+1 magazine capacity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95ICdl9fsE&amp;amp;feature=related It's apparently &amp;quot;slower than the USAS&amp;quot; from what little experience I've had with it and from people I've asked about it [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called G53 on PC as well. [[User:Ramell|Ramell]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 12x is a bugged accessory, that's usually only available on those weapons for DICE Employees [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 06:01, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::HK53 on PS3, hence that screenshot. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12x Ballistic Scope? Can you take a screenshot and post it here? :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:lol sorry, I don't know the first thing about taking screenshots. I'm sure someone else here could get a screenshot. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 20:30, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::All the BTK guns have the DICE-only attachments unlocked by default, that is to say, all the ones you're never supposed to get. If you want screen shots I'd get them in the next month or less as they'll probly get rid of them in the next patch. 12x Scope: FAMAS, L85A2, HK53, QBZ-95B, QBB-95, MG36. Flash Suppressor: QBU-88, L96. Suppressor: Jackhammer. Note that for the Jackhammer the suppressor doesn't appear on the model in first or third person, the stats don't change, and I'm pretty sure the sound doesn't either, so really, it doesn't exist. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:04, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it annoy the hell out of anyone else when people talk about how &amp;quot;realistic&amp;quot; BF3 is, specifically compared to MW3? Yes, DICE did a much better job on the modeling and it does have a more realistic ballistics engine, but come on. Every soldier carries around an infinitely reusable parachute? People run around with defibrillators to instantly revive teammates? Somehow the Support class fits an infinite amount of ammo for every caliber in his pocket? Then, of course, every single soldier is trained to use every jet, helicopter and tank, and the jets can be used as taxis with wing mounted seating. Don't get me wrong, these are all things that add to the enjoyment of the game, and they work really well as game mechanics, but not even remotely realistic. [[User:Animalmenace|Animalmenace]] 06:22, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They call it realistic because using the word &amp;quot;verisimilitude&amp;quot; makes people think you're trying to look clever for the sake of it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:27, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Googling &amp;quot;Battlefield 3 is too realistic&amp;quot; and getting matching results is kinda funny. For some interesting comparisons: [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FacklerScaleOfFPSRealism Fackler Scale of FPS Realism] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an airsofter I find it that list really funny. Classic: All FPSs / Realistic: Airsoft :D Seriously though, what I look for when I think realism is things that work how they do in real life, how they have to work, not whether they normally are or should be used in that way. BF3 is rare in that it has the following: Tac and normal reloads all done right, one in the chamber, iron sights and optics lined up/used properly, all fire modes that should be on any weapon present, switching modes does not change the gun's stats (ie switching to semi makes gun more powerful) just the mode, damage (which can never be considered fully realistic) at a reasonable level and based on the calibre, bullet travel time and drop. Now, whether the Marines have the right weapons, vehicles, or camo, and stuff like that comes second to me, because even if they don't use a certain camo, they ''could'' as opposed to one in the chamber, which '''has''' to funtion like that. Russian soldiers don't use, say SG 553s, QJY-88s, or Jackhammers, but they could, and more importantly I can, because first and foremost in mulitplayer I'm me. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=496905</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=496905"/>
		<updated>2011-12-15T09:12:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* HK53 */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle Have] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle1 you] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle2 said] [http://www.moddb.com/mods/point-of-existence-2/images/ntw-20-anti-material-rifle3 NTW-20]? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:34, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.battlefield.com/images/bf3-hooah :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 13 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, the Far Cry 2 page is the best page ever created! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's because the game's too fun to take the time to do it ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:43, 12 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK53 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it only on the 360 version where the HK53 is, for some reason, referred to as the G53? And for some reason it comes standard with a 12x ballistic scope. It's quite amusing, the scope is as long as the gun. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 03:12, 15 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:M16_rifle_series&amp;diff=496680</id>
		<title>Talk:M16 rifle series</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:M16_rifle_series&amp;diff=496680"/>
		<updated>2011-12-14T20:20:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* What is the point of the Colt 9mm SMG? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Additional Variants==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BattleLA M16A4.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M16A4 (5.56x45mm) with ACOG scope, RIS foregrip, Magpul MBUS rear sight, and AN/PEQ-15 IR designator as seen in ''[[Battle: Los Angeles]]'']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CustomNorthHollywoodAR15.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Custom AR-15/M16 Hybrid gun (5.56x45mm) made to resemble the firearm used by Emil Matasareanu in the 1997 North Hollywood Bank Of America Shootout, represented in the film ''[[44_Minutes:_The_North_Hollywood_Shootout|44 Minutes:The North Hollywood Shootout.]]'']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4_SWAT-1-.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M4A1 with ACOG scope and Surefire M500AB weaponlight. This is one of the screen-used weapons seen in ''[[S.W.A.T. (film)|S.W.A.T.]]'' - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OlympicArmsAR15.jpg|thumb|none|600px|An Olympic Arms AR15 (note: Olympic arms did not renamed their rifles with the &amp;quot;K&amp;quot; designation until after the 1990s) with A2 Handguards and the Olympic Arms stowaway pistol grip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M203xm177.jpg|thumb|none|600px|XM177 - 5.56x45mm with M203 grenade launcher 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UVARCarbine.jpg|thumb|600px|none|CAR-15 like the one used in ''[[Uncommon Valor]]'' - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A1M203ScarfaceCombo.jpg‎ |thumb|none|600px|World IMFDB Exclusive:  Screen used Faux M203 Launcher with M16A1 with Quadrant and Front ladder sight - 5.56x45mm.  This is verified screen used from the film ''[[Scarface]]''. Two 30 round magazines have been taped together with black gaffer's tape to emulate the way Tony Montana loaded his weapon in the film.  What is interesting is that the tape in the movie does really appear to be motion picture gaffer's tape, which would only be common on ... a movie set.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:model 656.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M16A1 with 20-round magazine, fitted with scope - 5.56x45mm]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4 m203 old.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Model 727 - 5.56x45mm with [[M203 grenade launcher]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:607-2-sm-741x267.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Model 607 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM177_shorty.jpg|thumb|none|600px|CAR-15 SMG - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Icsm4ris2006.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M4A1 with a RIS foregrip and AN/PEQ-2 IR designator - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mockcommando.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt XM177E2 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GUU-5P.jpg|thumb|none|600px|GUU-5/P - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Colt Law Enforcement Model 6920 Carbine..jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Law Enforcement Carbine with ACOG scope and PentagonLight MD3R weaponlight, screen-used weapon from ''[[I Am Legend]]'' - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M148.jpg|thumb|none|600px|XM177E2 - 5.56x45mm with a mounted [[XM148 grenade launcher]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:K3B.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Olympic Arms K3B carbine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:101-rifle-c8fthb-carbine-6.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Canada C8A3 Carbine with EOTech red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4M203ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M16A4 rifle - 5.56x45mm with ACOG scope and M203 grenade launcher - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CAXM177.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A Classic Army XM177 airsoft replica rifle - 5.56x45mm (of the type used by SF troops in some scenes of the movie ''[[Green Zone]]'').]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M653M203.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Model 653 5.56x45mm with magazine removed and M203 grenade launcher 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cam15a4tacticalcarbine.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Classic Army M15A4 airsoft carbine rifle - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colt AR15 Match Target Competition HBAR II 6731.jpg|thumb|600px|none|Colt AR15 Match Target HBAR II (Model MT6731) - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
this is the marushin cap gun?--[[User:Kin93|Kin93]] 07:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, you are right, it is, so this is one of the FIRST guns I need to photograph (a real one) and replace this Airsoft abomination. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 07:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Actually thats a ICS airsoft M4 with the grip and laser box....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An airsoft gun and a cap gun aren't the same thing. LOL [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:43, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Interesting ==&lt;br /&gt;
...I seriously doubt anyone will ever see an underslung version of the M203 used in a film, all by itself, ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but there have been stand alone M203 launchers (modified with a pistol grip and stock like the M79LF 37mm launchers) as well as the M203 being attached to guns other than the M16 (take Rambo III for example where they attached it to an AK).  Having a section on the M16 w M203 on the M16 page makes sense since that is where people will look if they're curious about that particular combo appearing in a movie.  But I like having a separate page for the M203 to address more detailed history of the launcher plus any applications where the launcher is used with other weapons.  Just a thought...&lt;br /&gt;
::We do need a page where M203s are used as stand alone launchers, rare, but it has happened.  But we should shift all M203s underslung to M16s to the M16 Page and have a note directing users to that page when looking for that combination on the M203 page.  Just IMHO.... [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 01:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Makes sense, that configuration. Also, there was a standalone M203 on Bones, and there might be others (sometime WAY in the future, when a director wants to use a &amp;quot;modern&amp;quot; version of an M79, like how James Cameron used the fictional roto-craft in place of the Huey).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do well really need to have an &amp;quot;A2&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;A3&amp;quot; category?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] has already explained that just about all of the &amp;quot;M16A2s&amp;quot; used in movies are actually A2 uppers on A1 lowers, often with A1 flash hiders. By this definition, none of them are true &amp;quot;M16A2s&amp;quot;, and might actually be considered M16A3s roughly. But since they're usually seen impersonating M16A2s, I say designate by receiver style only (both the A2 and A3 have what is usually called the &amp;quot;A2 receiver&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I think we should ditch the M16A3 category completely. It makes no sense to distinguish between A2s and A3s when basically all of the &amp;quot;Hollywood&amp;quot; A2s and A3s are the same type of gun. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 20:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never got anyone's feedback on this, but...I decided to go ahead and ditch the M16A3 entry, for the reasons I explained above. It doesn't make sense to try and distinguish between &amp;quot;A2s&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;A3s&amp;quot; in movies when MoviePropMaster has explained that they're all basically the same thing - A2-style uppers on fully automatic A1 lowers. By that definition, none of them are true &amp;quot;M16A2s&amp;quot;, but since they're obviously supposed to portray such rifles in movies, it makes more sense to call them A2s. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 01:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, because the M16A3 was made for Navy SEALs and SeeBees, no civilian hands hae touched them. -Winchester (1-26-09)&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the 1995 remake of Village of the Damned  portrayed the National Guard using burst fire. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 03:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(the above was in reply to a comment that the author deleted as i posted.) --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 03:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also I think Colt sold A3s to foreign entities, National police of allied countries, Elite units, etc.  Any country with which we are friendly and Colt has sold weapons in the past.  I've heard that A3s were sold as samples to France, U.K. and Germany (but that was a casual comment that I heard years ago).  There 'could' be A3s in the armories of foreign movie productions.  That is a completely grey area with which I have no one to verify anything.  :(   [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 05:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is strange. I posted a comment here a couple hours ago, asking how many movies are there were burst fire is portrayed? I know Black Hawk Down has one instant. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've seen some films that had three round burst fire.  I will try to get the titles and list them [[Special:Contributions/205.172.16.102|205.172.16.102]] 01:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a significant difference between a true A2 and A3 M16. Externally, they look identical, however the A3 is full auto and the A2 is 3 shot burst. Simply put: A1 and A3 are full auto, A2 and A4 are 3 shot burst. The external differences are what make it a little easier to identify. We all know what an A1, A2, and A4 M16 look like, but the A3 is just an A2 that is full auto. Hope this helps; Its my first time posting. --[[User:Ranger12|Ranger12]] 10:14, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The caption to the M16A1 w/ M16A2 handguards... ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was in the National Guard in the early '90's and that's exactly what we had.  I was also issued an M16A1 with A2 handguards in basic training.  It turns out that it's simpler and--from what I heard--cheaper to replace the 'A1 guards with 'A2 guards because the 'A2's are less complex and you only need to stock one type instead of 'lefts' and 'rights'.  Also, the 'A1'a in the national guard were freshly rebuilt, tested, and had the serial numbers laser etched into the bolt carriers.  They were issued with all 'A2 furniture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I've seen plenty of A1s with A2 hand guards elsewhere. In fact, if you ever watch footage of the current offensive into Gaza, you can see both IDF personnel and Hamas militants using them. The Israelis received a lot of M16A1s and have updated many of them with the M16A2 hand guards. Many of these rifles were passed into Israeli's &amp;quot;allies&amp;quot; in Fatah, and then Hamas stole plenty of them during their war with Fatah (some were also probably stolen from the IDF themselves). -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 22:53, 9 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just for the record here is an M16A1 with A2 handguards in service &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:RP Marines assault line DM-SD-06-10463.JPEG|thumb|none|600px|RP Marines armed with M16A1s with A2 handguards.]] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 22:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mark 12 Special Purpose Rifle ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have an image of one?&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:AdAstra2009]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I put one on the ''[[Live Free or Die Hard]]'' page that I took from another site. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 01:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks I pasted it from that page but we should probably look into getting a noncopyrighted one.&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:AdAstra2009]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, you can ask MoviePropMaster2008 if he has a Mark 12 upper in his company's inventory. I imagine he also knows armorers at Cinema Weaponry (the guys who supplied the weapons for ''[[Live Free or Die Hard]]''), so he might even be able to get us one of the same guns used in that movie. But he's very busy of course and has LOTS of other image requests to tend to, so it might be a while before he gets around to it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rate of Fire on the M16A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know the rate of fire on the M16A1?[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 22:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I assume it's about 800 rounds a minute [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 08:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That would be correct, it's around 750 to 800 RPM. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is this? ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's not really from a movie, but a music video, and I havn't been able to figure out what this AR is yet, there are two others in the video, one's an M16A1, the other an A2, but I just can't figure this one out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:RA_Rifle1.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:RA_Rifle2.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:RA_Rifle3.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:RA_Rifle4.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:RA_Rifle5.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like an M733, what is this from? [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 08:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The gun in the first 'cap looks different from the CAR-15s in the other pictures. Maybe it's a fake XM177?-[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 12:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's from the music video for Hero Of War by Rise Against, the main soldier uses it, his two buddies use an M16A1 and M16A2, I'm almost 100% sure there are only three rifles in the video. Yeah, I'm thinking M733 too... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==XM607 Commando Carbine==&lt;br /&gt;
I do remember the weapon from ''[[Pink Caddilac]]'' an XM607, or an AR-15 modified to imitate one. The weapon may not have been officially adopted but kits were released to the public though:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://totalsilenceinc.com/XM607_pages/questions.html 1]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.retroblackrifle.com/ModGde/CrbGde/607.html 2]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fototime.com/A2FFCE89093C8E7/standard.jpg 3]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Cutaway|Cutaway]] 18:54PM, 3/7/2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I changed the entry after I watched the trailer for the movie. The trailer is on YouTube, and the gun in question is visible at the 00:27-00:28 mark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LddykTA8nVg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is definitely an older-model LaFrance Specialties M16K. It doesn't have the triangular front sight post of the XM607. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 18:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Photoshopped M16 images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can people '''please''' stop posting the images of M16 variants that were edited using MPM's photos? There's a reason I've removed them before. We don't need to have every variant on the page, and many of them are inaccurate, anyway. The only one we allow is the XM16E1, because we don't have a good photo of one of those yet, and even that may get replaced. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Colt 607 image I posted wasn't one of MPM's [unless someone stole it and re-hosted it], I got it from google. Only put it here because the page for the The World Is Not Enough videogame didn't have a 607 image. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 05:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why do we have Colt Model 727 by itself==&lt;br /&gt;
When the Model 727 is just the commercial Colt name for the M4 carbine?  it doesn't make sense to have the exact GUN made by Colt with it's commercial name (for law enforcement sales or international sales) with a separate category, when it should just be merged in with the M4/M4A1 category.  The M16 page is getting out of control.   MPM2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that the Model 727 should be merged with the M4 category, but it's not exactly a commercial name for an M4.  The Model 777 is the commercial name for the very first M4 (the one that didn't have the detachable carry handle).  The 727 and 777 are identical, but the 727 is safe-semi-auto and the 777 is safe-semi-burst. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Good point.  But in the overall view, I think all that info (a) should be in the M4 category, (b) should be a footnote, NOT a separate category and (c) people are endlessly creating separate categories for weapons that are essentially the same guns as other categories.  Experienced IMFDB users/Mods already know that most of the M16 variants seen in films are build ups of other guns.  We usually just get the accessories and barreled uppers and put them on our full auto or semi auto lowers.  Why spend thousands to get new guns when we're sitting on dozens and dozens of other M16s?  Also, in VideoGames and Anime, again, they don't have to specify the new or commercial model unless it's specifically stated or named explicitly.  Even then it can be a footnote in the original category.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adding images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm getting a little annoyed with people adding images we don't need on the page, including many that are crap and which aren't necessary.  Not to mention that half of them aren't even using the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;br clear=all&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot; command to ensure that the images won't drift into the next gun entry.  So, I'm putting a stop to this now.  No more without talking about it here first.  Next person who doesn't respect my wishes gets a 1-week time out. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 17:23, 18 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They're still doing it.  I have removed the custom A1 upper mounted on an SP1 lower with A2 handguards from this page several times.  It is not a common real like frankengun (but it has happened).  I originally built this and photographed it for the HEAT page until better screenshots proved that Wes Studi's AR15 was an A1 style lower, not an SP1.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't agree more, for some reason, these users seem to think that every single picture of a gun needs to be on it's page. It especially frustrates me when they're sticking all customized guns that only appear in one movie onto a page, they may look cool, but they're not even standard configurations! All they end up doing is turning the gun page into a cluttered, sloppy mess of pictures, I mean just look at the [[Remington 870]] and [[Mossberg 500]] pages.--[[User:Alienqueen11|Alienqueen11]] 22:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be alright if I added the following image to the [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 with M203 Grenade Launcher|M4/M4A1 with M203 Grenade Launcher]] section?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sopmod m4 m203 06.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M4A1 5.56x45mm with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, flip-up rear sight, and M203 grenade launcher 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figured that since the other sections on the page have pics of the 'basic' and 'tricked-out' versions, why not this one? [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 21:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have any pictures of a heavily modified M4 style platform? ex- The Unit, BlackHawk Down, Tears of the Sun? [[User:Dirtdiver6421|Dirtdiver6421]] 17:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So why not update this page to include current issue M16A4 rifles?&lt;br /&gt;
(unless you don't know what they are....)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Warm Thank-You==&lt;br /&gt;
For years I have been trying to find out what the guns were Peter &amp;amp; Roger used in Dawn of the Dead. This site solved what the problem so many other &amp;quot;gun experts&amp;quot; on IMDb could not. Again, thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Thats what IMFDB is for =) --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 18:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Let's See If You Can Figure This Out==&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find a real picture so I put this together. Its an M4A1 with the old style stock, and a straight (no cuts) 16&amp;quot; barrel; or its a Sporter (or one of those older three number ones like that) with a removable carry handle; take your pick. I was just wondering what it actually is...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. Every detail is intentional and exactly how its supposed to be even though its not a real picture, just so everyone knows that. ;)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4A1COD4.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be a hybrid commercial AR variant.  It has an M16A1 style lower receiver, so it is NOT a Sporter I or II.  Basically, it's an M4 Carbine with a flat top and detachable carry handle, with an old style buttstock and a civilian HBAR Carbine barrel outfitted with RIS forearms.  Various manufacturers made similar guns to this design, like Bushmaster and a few others.  Also many builders of AR15s made similar guns from parts kits from M&amp;amp;A, Patriot Arms, (the now defunct Nesard), Sun Valley, and others.  With the advent of custom builds from aftermarket parts from dozens of manufacturers, the AR15 has become the ultimate &amp;quot;mutt&amp;quot;.  I can tell you this is NOT an issued military variant, so it would NOT have an &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; designation unless it was built from an M4 to begin with.   Also nearly everyone uses the step down M4 style barrels for carbines, unless it's the ultra light.  The HBAR Carbine style barrels are becoming rarer by the day since their heyday was the 1990s. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 07:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks a lot, very informative answer. This is the &amp;quot;M4 Carbine&amp;quot; in Call Of Duty 4, and I've been trying to figure out exactly what it really is for a while. I didnt say where it was from because I figured the answer I'd get would be something like &amp;quot;its a videogame, so its probably not a real model&amp;quot;, but I knew that ;) I like the look and have been trying to make it as an airsoft project, this helps a lot... too bad airsoft HBAR barrels are very hard to come by. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How did you make that? At first I thought it was Pimp My Gun, but PMG doesn't have an M16A1 pistol grip yet. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 14:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::No, you thought right my friend, it is Pimp My Gun, I just used MS Paint to remove the little finger nub and made the HBAR barrel by copying and pasting the largest part of the barrel over the rest of it. That's all the &amp;quot;photoshopping&amp;quot; that I did. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:45, 13 &lt;br /&gt;
February 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If it's from CoD4, then blame lack of details on modelers that made that gun model. They simply saved some poligons for improved performance of the game. Same thing with lack of gas-block when front sight is removed. It supposed to be M4A1 and i'm 100% sure they had pictures of military issued M4A1's as a reference.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm sure they wanted it to be an M4A1, but I've seen a lot of movies where HK94s were converted to be MP5s, or 92FSs were converted to be 93Rs and last I checked on this site we identify guns on what they are, not what they're supposed to be... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A1 series' portray ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the present, does anyone think that like the Ak47 and its variants, the M16A1 series is sometimes stereotypically portrayed as a bad guy's gun?&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen the IRA, FARC guerillas, Mexican drug lords and some gangbangers use them.&lt;br /&gt;
Overall is this true?&lt;br /&gt;
:In the real world, the USSR dumped millions of AKs into the hands of satellite states and insurgents around the world.  In the Vietnam and immediate post Vietnam years the U.S. dumped millions of M16A1s to our allies.  With the fall of Vietnam, all of the South Vietnamese M16A1s ended up in the hands of communist guerillas (as well as the AK).  The AK and the M16 were the most prolifically distributed weapons of the last 50 years.  There is no conspiracy to make them 'look bad'.  They're in the hands of everyone so it is invevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
:Even Iran uses a variant of the M16A1, a copy of the Norinco CQ called the ''S-5.56'', as their standard rifle. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AR Series firing 5.7 Ammo??? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was in a gun shop in Michigan today and saw a weapon with an AR-15 type body but with the mag of a P-90 running along the rail.  I asked the guy at the shop and he did confirm the weapon did fire the 5.7 round.  Anyone have any idea who makes the weapon and what it may be called?  Incidentally the store was The Firing Line in Westland Michigan. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 03:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::They sell those uppers here in California all the time.  My local gun store has 5.7mm firing AR15 uppers that take the P90 magazine.  But I never bothered to check who made it, that's what GOOGLE is for.  I just never had an interest [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 07:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have seen examples of this conversion as well. It is actually a specially-made upper receiver that can be mounted onto pretty much any AR-15 style lower receiver. The magazine mounts along the top of the weapon as with the P90, and the original magazine well in the lower receiver becomes the ejection port with the spent brass falling down through there instead of being spit out to the side. As for the manufacturer, I can't quite recall who makes it, but it is definitely quite an interesting piece of hardware. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 07:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as my memory goes, is called the AR-57 and is manufactured by 57Center, or something like that --[[User:Yocapo32|Yocapo32]] 15:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember when Impact Guns got those in.  You can buy them here: http://www.impactguns.com/store/AR-57%20UR.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The manufacturer's web site, as Yocapo32 pointed out, is 57 Center.  Their web site is here: http://www.57center.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What's interesting is that the AR magazine well is where the brass gets ejected.  The only problem I can see with having a P90 magazine mounted on top is that it leaves limited rail space on top for mounting accessories.  You could have a scope or iron sights, and not much else. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 15:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the info guys, again, I know this was not germane to the topic, it was just a little odd to see something like that as I had never heard of it before. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 16:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stolen M4A1s==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In real life is there ever any incidents where police have seized M4A1 carbines from criminials or terrorists during raids?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you mean mil-spec M4s, as opposed to semi-auto AR-15 carbines that are patterned after the M4?  I would doubt it. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 21:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Never, or else it has never been reported anywhere, ever.  And I am talking about real select fire 14.5&amp;quot; barreled M4/M4A1 carbines.  However, California has had a rash of MP5s and MP5Ks stolen out of police cars, which were left unlocked when the cops were in a strip club.  Seriously.   they have not shown up since....[[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suitable combat weapon==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which weapon is considered better for infantry? An M16A1/M203 combo or an OICW?&lt;br /&gt;
:M16A1/M203. The XM29 weighs damn near 20 lbs., compared to 8 or 9 lbs. for the M16 when fitted with a 203. Fire control system or not, the last thing I'd want to be stuck with on a 60 mile march is an F-ing 20 lbs. rifle. And sign your posts by typing four '''~''' after them. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 23:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The M16/M203 combo is definitely superior; it has been proven in real-world combat situations over the last 30-plus years, whereas the only live-fire situation the XM29 has seen at the most is at the Aberdeen testing ranges. The closest replacement the M16/M203 will likely see anytime soon is an [[FN SCAR]]/[[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320]], and even then the SCAR is only in limited use with the 75th Ranger Regiment at present. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 05:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real question is whether or not the XM8 Carbine is better than the M4A1/derivatives (H&amp;amp;K 416, REC7, etc). And we probably won't ever know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the OICW was more of a man-portable version of a Doom gun than anything that you would actually bother carrying on duty. 20mm airburst auto-loader, saboted sub-5.56mm rounds? What could you use that for other than trying to clear a drug cartel's fortified mansion by yourself?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/72.189.150.170|72.189.150.170]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One of the many things that led to the death of the XM29 was its sheer size. The Army wanted it scaled down to the size of an M4 [http://www.ghostrecon.net/images_arms/xm29_1.jpg] and 14 lbs max (which an M4 with all its mods gets pretty close to), but with today's technology, it just wasn't possible. Maybe in 20 years or so it will be, but the XM29 is presently dead for the foreseeable future. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Installation of a front Flip up/down Iron sights. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching The Losers, and while I agree that those 4 characters all had M4A1s, they seemed to switch between fixed front sight and flip up/down iron sights.  I was wondering how hard it would be to take an M4A1, remove the front factory sight and replace it with a flip up/down sight.  I know it's pretty easy for the rear sight, but I wasn't sure about the front sight.  (OK, I also want to ask this question because I, like many people, have played Modern Warfare 2 and seen the M4 with a flip up/down front sight.) --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 03:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not really that difficult. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 04:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe the process would involve removing the muzzle brake and the existing front sight/gas block assembly and replacing it with a gas block that has either a rail to mount your choice of front sight, or a folding front sight, then reinstalling the muzzle brake. You can find instructional videos for this process at various gunsmithing websites. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 14:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Forward Assist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know when reloading if it is a good idea to hit the forward assist after hitting the bolt release or its ok just to start firing after hitting the bolt release?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea behind hitting the forward assist after reloading is to ensure the bolt is fully seated and that the weapon is ready to fire. It's generally not really nessicary at the range, but when in a combat situation where you might have dirt or whatnot fouling the chamber, it's a good idea to do that to ensure that the weapon will fire when you need it to.[[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 23:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The M16 series are the ONLY assault rifles (except the [http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=83:g41-series&amp;amp;catid=8:the-automatic-rifles&amp;amp;Itemid=5/ HK G41], which is made to be like the M16 and is no longer produced) in the world to have a forward assist. Why don't other assault rifles have a forward assist? (ie. the AK-74, G36 etc.) Because other assault rifles are more reliable and don't need it. :)&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh more associated with the design of the Bolt than being more reliable.  The AK series have a bolt handle attached DIRECTLY to the bolt carrier as do many other designs.  If there is debris or fouling in the chamber which keeps a round from seating properly you can just jam the handle forward (I've done this in the field when my AK / Garand / Galil / M 14 / etc jammed)  I once had a tiny piece of bark (I was firing  under trees) which fell from above and fell into the ejection port and made the round 'stick' really badly in the chamber so that it would not seat properly.  The M16 design has no way other than the forward assist to nudge the bolt &amp;amp; carrier forward enough to fire and kick that crap free of the action.  But I wouldn't bash the M16 as an &amp;quot;unreliable&amp;quot; rifle.  I'd sure take it into battle right now. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 20:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alright, I understand. thanks for the extra info. I'm not saying the M16/M4 is a complete piece of crap, but it's definitely not the BEST ASSAULT RIFLE IN THE WORLD! like we Americans like to state all the time (*rolls eyes*). You and me both know the M16/M4 is no where as reliable as the G36 or the AK series. But at least it's better than the L85 series, now that's a piece crap rifle. :D *Edit: Well at least the L85A1, the L85A2 is OK. kinda like the M16/M16A1s sucks but the M16A2/A4s are good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I have to completely disagree with what you say, i don't wish to come off as passive aggresive but you sound like a mall ninja that learned their weapons knowledge from seeing them perform in videogames or hearing public opinions on weapons from the news or other sources. The M16 family of rifles are both fine and fairly reliable weapons, while much of that view has been skewed by the fact they were portrayed as unreliable during conflicts such as Vietnam, is incorrect to a degree. The M16 is a reliable and capable weapon when cleaned and properly maintained, it simply lacks the ability to stay so when not properly serviced, as some other rifles such as the AKM can function fine without cleaning, the M16 can not. As for your comment on the L85 series, yes they were somewhat poor and unreliable weapons at first, coupled with poor grips and clumsy to handle for certain users, however the newer models have made large improvements and are very capable firearms. As i feel it needs to be said (or typed) a common mistake people make is assuming that militaries have access and funding to field their troops with the best weapons available, which is not always the case as most countries don't have the money to field an Army with rifles that can cost up to $5000-10000 per unit. Which is where the workhorses like M16's come in, you go for the &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; rifle not the &amp;quot;great&amp;quot; one. Also, although off-topic it somewhat pertains to the M16, most mall ninja's assume the AK-family is better because it is more reliable and fires a heavier cartridge, I've always asked &amp;quot;would you want a round that's going to pierce right through an enemy and leave an easy to treat wound, or have a round that hits an enemy and fragments inside them causing an ungodly bloody mess?&amp;quot; Hopefully esteemed imfdb members such as MPM2008 will agree with and share my viewpoint concerning this subject, as well as not condemn me for my long comment. [[User:Doc345|Doc345]] 13:24, 06 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The issues of jamming during the Vietnam War had more to do with ammunition and the lack of a chrome-lined chamber and barrel than the rifle's so-called &amp;quot;dirty&amp;quot; gas system. In 1964 the Army switched from stick powder to ball powder, which increased the rate of fire to over 1,000 RPM and left a lot of dirty residue in the weapon. This was only exacerbated by the lack of cleaning kits and training on how to maintain the weapon. They fixed the issue by fitting the rifle with a buffer system (which slowed the ROF down) and chrome-plated chamber. Training programs in weapon maintenance were instituted and an instruction book on how to maintain the rifle was circulated among troops. After further modifications resulted in the M16A1, many of the reliability issues disappeared (although even today, the weapon has yet to shed its bad reputation). The M16A2, A3, A4, and M4 carbine of today are an entirely different breed of warrior than the prototypes that were issued back in the 60s. While it may admittedly be a bit finicky, the M16 today is a good weapon. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:29, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah but it's still a very fussy weapon, it's not very durable, and it has much more malfunctions/jams then say the H&amp;amp;K G36, but none the less it's still a excellent weapons platform, mostly. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The comment about the SPR Mk 12 shooting full auto... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The design--at least the original ones--used a match grade trigger group that actually fired full auto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If my Web Fu is correct, NSN 1005-01-562-0901 from Knight's Armament.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original, intended purpose was to allow the uppers to be swapped out for a short barreled model initially so a marksman could use a short range weapon on the way in and out and the more accurate upper at the objective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources:  https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&amp;amp;mode=form&amp;amp;id=003aa7475e95c9b56d5814227cc5d4ec&amp;amp;tab=core&amp;amp;_cview=0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;amp;mode=form&amp;amp;id=fbd46923c9e6d18cd916b8a6e7d3cfdf&amp;amp;tab=core&amp;amp;_cview=0  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States the Special Purpose Receiver (Early designs) specifies:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(C) OTHER PERFORMANCE GOALS: (1) Increased reliability, durability, corrosion resistance, ease of cleaning, lubricity/reduced friction; fully functional for a minimum of 15,000 rounds (Threshold)/30,000 rounds (Objective), performing up to the standards and firing rates to be published in the Solicitation, functional reliability exceeding that of the standard M4A1 carbine at high and low temperature extremes as well as other hostile (sand/dust/dirt/mud/surf) environmental conditions (2) Improved safety- delay cook-off, fail-safe features, fires/functions safely and without delay of draining in the Over-The-Beach (surf zone, weapon flooded with water) environment. (3) User Acceptance: operational suitability, increased live-fire hit scores, decreased live-fire engagement times, speed/accuracy of engagement, '''controllability in semi-automatic and full automatic fire''', improved handling qualities, light weight, snag free in movement through vegetation and battlefield obstacles.&amp;quot;  (Accent added)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Standard Issue M4 vs. M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the Army issue regular infantry (i.e. 4th Inf. Div.) the three-round burst M4 or the M4A1? I always thought it was the M4A1 (and please forgive me if I got to the party late), but from what I've read, it seems like they issue the regulars the Model 920, leaving the 921 for Special Forces and the like. -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think it all depends on the on-base armory. for example some armory's might still have some M4s. but i think the regular infantry does use the M4A1. however. Special forces dont use the M4A1 or the M4. they use the hK416/417. [[User:Dirtdiver6421|Dirtdiver6421]] 17:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:- Though I don't know for certain, I wouldn't imply Spec-Ops units use ''only'' the new HK rifles - As you've said, it all depends on what's around, and to a degree what the soldiers prefer (in the case of Special units). Though the aforementioned HK rifles are in inventory, that doesn't automatically cancel the M4s out - some personnel might still use 'em. Plus there are other weapons around, namely the FN SCAR series. Though I would agree use of the M4 with Special Forces probably isn't as common these days.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; As for a regular-issue weapon, I agree that the M4 and M4A1 are both in use nowadays, with the A1 perhaps being more prominent. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 19:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, Stan, my understanding is that it's the opposite.  The M4 is the most common version, not the M4A1.  U.S. military doctrine still discourages full-auto for infantry rifles, so it seems unlikely to me that the M4A1 is going to be more common.  As for the SCAR, SOCOM just decided this past June that they weren't going to order any more SCAR-Ls for the foreseeable future, which means that even amongst most SF units, the M4 will remain their standard weapon. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 01:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:- Well, I wasn't too sure, but I guess that does make sense to stick with the burst-fire M4. Good point. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 01:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only SF unit that uses the M4 (920) that I can think of is the Asymmetric Warfare Group, but that's only 'cause they had to hand in their HK416s. According to a book I've got, that decision went over like a lead balloon with the AWG. -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
thank god. im not a huge fan of the SCAR-L i find it pointless. if you want to go with a new alternative to the M4/M16. why the hell would you take an unfamiliar weapon. alas the hK416. same rate of fire. same Picatanny rail, same attachments, same stock, same barrel, same trigger group, and extremely similiar internals. and Stan, i do agree. if i made it sounds like all SF use the hK416, i didnt mean to. i/we really DONT no what they all use. they pick their own. they could carry an AK-47 or a CAR-15 if they wanted to. we cant make generalizations about units that get custom made equipment. [[User:Dirtdiver6421|Dirtdiver6421]] 20:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- No prob, dude - I'm just glad you got what I was gettin' at. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 20:56, 3 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i would be shocked if they couldnt pick their weapons. their the best soldiers on the planet. it just doesnt make sense not to be able to. it would be like giving a star baseball player a 10 dollar glove. itll do but why wouldnt they get the best thats out there. [[User:Dirtdiver6421|Dirtdiver6421]] 01:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reg army units use the burst M4, not the full auto A1. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of months ago when I was at a military base there were Marines conducting a weapons demo with the M4 carbine. It was the 3-round burst rifle, but a question came up about the M4A1.  One Marine said that they got rid of all M4A1s and only have M4s.  I personally don't see the need for a full-auto rifle and 3-round burst is fine because it forces the user to slow down and most of the time the user uses semi-only, combat or not, but that is my opinion.  The M4A1 is still probabley used by the US Military, but I'm not sure, I haven't seen one in a long time.--[[User:MarineCorps1|MarineCorps1]] 23:29, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt Accurized Rifle ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After seeing several pages of real firearms appearing in only one film or game, I was wondering if I should expand this page with a new section for the [http://www.colt.com/law/car.asp Colt Accurized Rifle], which to my knowledge has only ever appeared in [[S.W.A.T. 4]]. Before I do that, I need to confirm two things: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is the Colt Accurized Rifle indeed another variant on the M16 line of rifles, or a separate take on the AR-15 design altogether? I suppose there's a reason why we don't include the [[Z-M LR 300]] in the M16 page because it's the latter--I need to know if the Colt Accurized Rifle falls in that category.&lt;br /&gt;
*Including it on this page would make it the first Designated Marksman Rifle variant here. So far I only see assault rifles or carbines here. Would including a DMR in this page be a problem or not? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there are no real problems, I'll make a new section for it, but I have no idea where I'll get a non-copyright infringment image of one. --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 01:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It'd be the '''second''' DMR on the page. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the info, but can someone confirm that the Colt Accurized Rifle is indeed descended from the M16 line of assault rifles and not a separate take on the AR-15 design like the aforementioned LR-300 is? I still have no idea where I can get a photo of this DMR that respects copyright. All I have are game screenshots. Some help here, please? --[[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 22:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removeable Carry Handle for Colt 9mm SMG? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does such a Gun exist?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as a production gun (Colt's website makes no mention of one, anyway), but the modular nature of the AR system makes such a configuration entirely possible. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 14:46, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why do we have a Colt AR-15 SP1 category that is separate from the M16/SP1 category?==&lt;br /&gt;
The guns look the same, sure the SP1 had a design change in 1978 (three prong flash hider was changed to birdcage, rear sling swivel was changed to A1 style and the color went from greenish grey to straight grey) but unless we see the stamp on the side that says &amp;quot;Property of  U.S. Government&amp;quot; we can't tell if it's a real M16 (which WERE sold via Title II dealers to armories) and a Colt AR15 SP1 which was converted to full auto (which was done A LOT prior to 1986).  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 19:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About M4 Commando and M16A4 Full Auto ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full Auto M16A4 (Model 905) is [http://www.colt.com/mil/M16_2.asp Model 901]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.colt.com/mil/M4Com_2.asp Model 933] ''is'' M4 Commando (Full Auto)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.colt.com/mil/home.asp Manufacturer's site] says it all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt Model 653 barrel length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am trying to pin down what a gun is for a page I'm working on. It has a forward assist but no deflector, A1 rear sight, M4 length tubular handguard, 16&amp;quot; barrel with birdcage flash hider and a solid stock. Basically it matches the gun in the picture for the Model 653 on the main page, apart from having a solid stock but that is easily changeable. However, every source I can find about the 653 says that it has a 14&amp;quot; barrel. Was the gun made in different barrel lengths but kept the same designation, and if not, anyone know what the gun is that is pictured as a 653? Also, while I'm on the topic of obscure colt carbines, does anyone know of a model that will match a 725 (original C8 without the flat-top) but has an A2 rear sight? Thanks, --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:16, 16 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can anyone figure out what this is? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found this hidden in my computer, I think it's a Colt Canada C7A1 as a base, I can tell it's C7 because of the Canadian leaf on the the lower receiver, it would be an A1 because of the removable carrying-handle. What the heck is that hand-guard? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:02, 28 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Colt Canada C7A1 SPW.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Colt Canada C7A1 SPW?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Colt Model 750/Diemaco C7 Light Support Weapon - A modified C7 with an enlarged gas tube (hence the square handguard) and a heavy barrel for sustained fire in the squad automatic weapon role. The C7 LSW is not used by the Canadian Forces but has seen service with the Dutch and Danish militaries. --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 01:34, 28 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ha! I thought so, thanks. :) Should I remove this section or keep it. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:53, 28 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not Colt LSW, that's [http://www.colt.com/mil/CAR.asp Colt Automatic Rifle]. Follow the link and you will see that the image is the larger version of the official one. Meanwhile, [http://www.coltcanada.com/lsw-page.htm Colt LSW] has optional folding carry handle. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:09, 29 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks guys. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:02, 29 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to clarify, the Colt automatic rifle, LSW and LMG are all the same weapon. The original version that looks like the one above was the Colt Model 750, which featured a fixed A2 carry handle and barrel mounted bi-pod, and the newer version above is the current production Model 950, with the relocated bi-pod and A4 rear sights. As you said, the folding carry handle is removeable, and the picture on the Colt website is just one without it fitted (note the longer centre vent on the top of the handguard is the mounting point for the handle).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 02:48, 1 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The original version was based on M16A1:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:M16A1 CAR.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The one you described was based on M16A2:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:M16A2 CAR.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys, remember back in the 1980s when Colt was trying to vie for the SAW role?  Sure the FN Minimi was never knocked off its perch, but Colt came out with a Colt light Machine gun that looked a lot like this.  They were selling the barreled uppers on the market for a while in the early 1990s (I know a few friends who have them, but I never got one).  This looks like that reincarnated!!! LOL![[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 15:24, 29 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, that's all written on [http://world.guns.ru/machine/usa/m16-lsw-lmg-e.html Modern Firearms] :P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah yes, you only read about it monkeyboy ;)  I was handling and firing that sucker! LOL [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 03:11, 1 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, and I've found articles of why AR is more advantageous than SAW to US Marine Corps:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/m249-employment-concepts M249 Employment Concepts]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/m249-light-machinegun-automatic-rifle-role The M249 Light Machinegun In The Automatic Rifle Role]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting reading, methinks :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 30 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah it was. :) You know, I kinda knew LMGs were dying out. :/ - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:07, 1 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Not overall, it's just the role they are being used in (automatic rifleman). SAW is still very good in defensive role and laying fire on attacking forces ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:33, 1 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heat Dissipation Performance of Carbine Barrel Types? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering, does anyone know what kind of effects the 'cuts' (originally meant for the mounting of the M203 grenade launcher) in the barrel of the M4 and similiarly-styled M16 &amp;amp; AR-15 series carbines has on the heat dissipation performance of the barrel? Do the cuts help the weapon release heat from prolonged firing better than a barrel that has a uniform thickness, or does it hamper that? Any input anyone can provide on this would be greatly appreciated. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 17:46, 8 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The step down for the grenade launcher is actually pretty negligible in terms of cooling (although it does create a point of weakness to bending), as what you can't see is the fact that as soon as the barrel goes under the handguard it is reduced down to the same narrow diameter as in the cut out, which creates a much bigger effect on cooling. The narrower profile sections have the effect of cooling down the barrel quicker, but they also conversely mean that the barrel heats up quicker, and the heat has a larger effect on the accuracy of the gun. The main advantage however is that it reduces the weight quite a bit. The original reason that the M4 barrel reduces in size behind the handguard is based on the M16A2, which does exactly the same thing where its heavy barrel is actually only thicker past the front sight. This was due to a cock up in the design, where they designed the gun with a full thickness straight barrel, and found that they could then no longer clamp the M203 to the barrel, so the barrels were simply turned down from behind the front sight post. The front of the barrel was left thick due to the fact that the thinner barrels on the M16A1 were being bent at the front from being used as pry-bars to get the loading bands off of shipping pallets.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:53, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a heavier &amp;quot;SOCOM-profile&amp;quot; barrel that maintains the same diameter beneath the handguards as the standard M4-profile barrel does around the M203 cut and it can mount the M203 just fine.[http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/v/vspfiles/photos/BCM-URG-M4-14SOCOM-2.jpg] [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:40, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== can you tell me what model of m16/car 15 this is ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sorry i do not have a pic but i can tell you what is like. me and my dad were talikng about some of the guns he used in the army and he was telling me about this one he said was like an carbine version of the m16a2 and it was like the m4 but had a fixed carring handle and it was used befor the m4 it had safe semi and burst and he said it just had ar15 on the side.-Steviebleckley&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like the first batch of M4s that were delivered. This is the Colt Model 777, which is basically an M4 with a fixed carry handle, and 3-round burst as opposed to full auto. It is the brother of and visually identical to the 727 mentioned on the main page, where the 727 as full auto as opposed to the burst. If it didn't have the M4 profile barrel though, god knows. Probably a model 654 on an M16 lower receiver or something. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:02, 13 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
yes it had the same profile as the m4. i gess it was the 777.I will show him the pic of the the 727 since there the same well the 727 is full auto thanks for the info - Steviebleckley&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question about the buffer tube ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not one hundred percent sure what it does, and (like the forward assist) that almost no other guns have it. If someone could just clarify, what does it do, why does this rifle series have it, and why don't others/what replaces the buffer tube in other rifles? Thank you in advance. --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 07:27, 12 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Basically, it was installed in order to slow down the rate of fire. The very first M16s ended up using a different ammunition powder than they were designed for, which caused a higher rate of fire than desired (about 800 to 1000 rpm I think), leading to excessive fouling in the chamber, and hence lots of stopages. From the M16E1 onwards a buffer tube was added to slow the rate of fire to about 600-700 rpm, and a chrome lined chamber and barrel was added as well.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:47, 12 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure if this is practical in any way, or even possible, but is their a way to increase the rate of fire on an M16 without the problems of the carbon build-up in the chamber?--[[User:MarineCorps1|MarineCorps1]] 23:29, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why would you want to increase the rate of fire? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:40, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
No reason, just wondering if it's even possible with a full-auto M16.--[[User:MarineCorps1|MarineCorps1]] 08:09, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably, I see no reason why you couldn't. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:40, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm assuming the reason that the high rate of fire caused fouling was that the rate of fire was so quick that the bolt was unlocking and opening before all the powder was fully burnt in the chamber, leaving residue. I'd imagine that you could increase the rate of fire by removing the buffer, and just make sure that whatever powder you were using was fully burnt in the time it takes the bolt to open.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:29, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That would make sense, since I heard the nightmare version of that was when the gas pressure was still holding the spent case in place while the extractor was trying to eject it, which tended to result in Horrible Things happening to the case while it was still inside the rifle. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 21:08, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might be a silly question, but why is it that the AR-15 design required the buffer tube, and other rifles do not? Is it just located differently, and if so why? It just strikes me that the lack of a folding stock option is a poor design, especially when compared to most assault rifles designed today, SCAR, ACR, etc. --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing here, but from what I've read it's that the rifle had already been designed, so they had to work inside the box, as it were. The only options were either to make the components of the action a lot heavier so their momentum prevented the weapon cycling too fast (which would rather defy the point of using a lightweight aluminium receiver and suchlike) or add something on to slow it down, which is what they did. Rifles designed since have been designed from the ground up to avoid this kind of problem, so don't need to have a tube attached to a hole in the back of the receiver to fix them. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 21:08, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The buffer tube does two things: 1) contains the buffer and spring and 2) allows the bolt carrier to recoil part of the way into it.  The combination means that the AR15-series rifles are functionally a long-recoil design where the bolt does not slam into anything rigid during recoil and stops based on the pressure of the buffer spring.  This--in turn--enhances the straight-line recoil and therefore controllability during automatic fire or rapid semi-automatic fire.  It also allows the AR15 design to use the rear of the bolt carrier to actuate the automatic sear meaning the probability in this design that you can set a round off with the bolt unlocked during automatic fire is nil.  (Look up some of the problems with the &amp;quot;Lightning Link&amp;quot; to get a better idea of why this works the way it does.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Other designs often do incorporate additional recoil buffers in the stock, the FN FAL's without folding stocks do this and the plastic-stocked SAW's, but the AR15 design simply trades the ability to fold a stock for enhanced recoil handling...  The idea behind the design was to make a weapon where the entire recoil force is in a direct line between your shoulder and the end of the barrel with as little jarring as possible.  This is also one reason for the use of a direct gas impingement system and one reason why gas-piston AR's tend to eat the front of the buffer tube and buffer tube area of the lower receiver due to bolt carrier &amp;quot;tilt&amp;quot;.  The &amp;quot;lateral&amp;quot; forces of the piston tapping the top of the bolt carrier misaligns the bolt carrier off its straight line path and pushes that chunk of steel into the aluminum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, and the forward assist is to compensate for not having a rigidly connected bolt handle.  (Like someone already mentioned).  The reason why is the design is meant to be operated in a manner where you ONLY use the charging handle for initial loading and then unloading at the end (administratively).  Every other time, you actuate the bolt using the bolt release on the left side of the weapon...  --[[User:Deathbunny|Deathbunny]] 01:28, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noob Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok I have a really dumb question, what is the difference between the Colt M4A1 and the Colt M4A1 Carbine? Or are they the same exact thing? The only reason I asked is when I was looking at the page, the M4A1 and the M4 Carbine look exactly the same, so how can you tell one from the other? - [[User:1morey]] July 22, 2011 11:21 AM (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The M4A1 and M4A1 'Carbine' are the same thing, the 'carbine' is just optionally showing the proper firearm type. As for the M4 and M4A1, well it ''does'' say the difference in the section but to answer - the M4 has Safe-Semi-Burst fire selection ala the M16A2/M16A4, the M4A1 has full-automatic instead of burst, ala the earlier M16s/M16A1/M16A3. Otherwise they're pretty much identical appearance wise (The M4A1 also has a heavier barrel inside the handguard, which of course you can't tell from the outside). It also notes some commercial AR-15 carbines are given an 'M4' moniker, but aren't the same as actual military M4s. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 12:17, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt or not? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a M4 or M16 variant is listed on a page, should it by prefixed by Colt? I've noticed some people doing this but isn't it incorrect as the term M16 is the army designation as opposed to the Colt name (for example the Colt Model 603 for the M16A1). Either way, I would imagine that quite a few M16s or M4s in movies are manufactured by companies other than Colt, and even the US military rifles are not necessarily made by Colt these days.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:43, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am curious... if the military M4 and M16 are not made by Colt these days then by whom? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:58, 6 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There was a stretch in the 1990s when Colt lost the military contract and all the M16s were built by Fabrique Nationale (FN).   Though many companies build AR15 platforms, only the company who has the contract with the Dept. of Defense can  call the M16 theirs.  If there ARE any other manufacturers being represented on the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, someone needs to find out.  I certainly don't have any contacts who would know information which is THAT current. :(  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 15:48, 6 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::FN have stated that “the vast majority of M16A2, A3 and A4 contracts as well as spare parts contracts for these systems since 1989”, and they had a $7 million contract to make M16A4s between 2005 and 2008. Sabre defence also won a contract for a minimum of 4,952 M16A3 and 702 M16A4 rifles in July 2008 for the US navy/Marine corps respectively. Having said that FN also stated: ”...never was FN Manufacturing LLC, or any other small arms manufacturer, awarded M4 contracts. The M4 cannot be competed and always has been awarded sole source to Colt because of licensing rights restricting full and open competition until 2009” although it has stated its intention to bid for M4 contracts past this point. The US government took ownership of the M4 design on the 1st July 2009, so the M4 can now be manufactured for the government by other companies, but I don't know if this has actually been done yet. Regardless, M4 and M16 are government designations, so surely calling a gun a &amp;quot;Colt M4&amp;quot; is incorrect?  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:09, 6 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Just checked the United States Army [http://www.army.mil/features/ official website]. It lists [http://www.army.mil/factfiles/equipment/individual/m4.html M4 Carbine] as being manufactured by Colt and [http://www.army.mil/factfiles/equipment/individual/m16.html M16 Rifle] by Colt and Fabrique Nationale.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh, and take a note of M16: ''&amp;quot;The '''M-16A3''' is identical to the M-16A2 but has a removable carrying handle that is mounted on a Picatinny Rail (for better mounting of optics) and is without burst control. The '''M-16A4''' is identical to the M-16A2 except for the removable carrying handle and Picatinny Rail.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
::::United States Marine Corps websites: [http://www.marines.mil/] [http://www.marines.com/] don't mention the current manufacturer for [http://www.marines.com/main/index/winning_battles/gear/weapons_and_equipment/m16 M16 Rifle]. So I am not sure about them. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:24, 7 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just to throw a bit of confusion in here, there are actually a number of different rifles designated as the M16A3 by the US military. The first is the Colt Model 646, also known as the M16A2E3, which was introduced in small numbers at the same time as the M16A2 and is an A2 with an A1 lower. Then you have the flat-top Colt Model 901 which was introduced at the same time as the M16A4 (in 1994 I think) and I'm assuming this is the version that the above page refers to. You also have the Colt Models 941 and 942 which are the HBAR and HBAR LMG models respectively, but I don't know if they are used. Not that any of this really matters as we identify all these guns as A2/A4 anyway.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:24, 7 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, that's because armorers don't have access to military M16A3s, so they just slap A2/A4 uppers to A1 lowers (correct?) because what Hollywood film director would want fixed burst firing gun (ignoring the fact that that's what soldiers and marines use) ? Or modify civilian semi-automatic replicas to fully automatic fire. In which case the weapon is to be identified as such. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:54, 7 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Didn't mean to imply we are doing anything wrong, just that the definition of the A3 models isn't that important as they don't appear. Having said that, the original M16A3/M16A2E3 was just an A2 upper on an A1 lower, so this is actually what a number of movie guns are, but I understand that they are going for a standard A2. Regardless, back to my original question, do we call them Colt or not?  My opinion is no obviously, as it seems that some if not the majority of M16s are manufactured by other companies, and there is the future possibility of this with M4, and regardless it is a military designation of a rifle that goes by another Colt name.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:31, 7 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::My opinion: M4 &amp;amp; M4A1 should remain as Colt. And so should older M16s. Modern M16s (M16A3 &amp;amp; M16A4), since they have ''at least'' 3 official manufacturers (Colt, Fabrique Nationale and Sabre Defence), should go without Colt. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:37, 7 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to NOT shoot an M16 rifle! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oh1lyMyejpI] - Seriously, this is either really funny, or just painful to watch... you decide. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 00:19, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, that was bad. Glad that guy's alright! - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:46, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, notice how many times the gun clicks and the guy keeps saying it's a &amp;quot;bad primer&amp;quot;. And then he keeps hitting the forward assist, pulling on the charging handle (which is seen ejecting the unfired rounds) and hitting the bottom of the magazine even though it's already back in the gun after he kept taking it out and putting it back in prior (Someone else in the video even says 'Jesus [name withheld], you don't know how to load these.' and the shooter responds with 'I didn't load these, [name withheld] did.'). I think that could have been a contribution to the gun exploding in his hands. But then again, I'm not the expert on M16 rifles, I'm only guessing. Anyone else got a better explanation? --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 17:05, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It was the shooter saying that the guy who came to help didn't know how to load them, and then that assisting guy said it was someone else. There is nothing wrong with tapping the magazine even when it appears to be seated correctly, as it makes sure it is all the way into the well. Although he did hit forward assist unnecesarily once or twice, I don't think it would have done any harm or contributed to the kaboom. The file description and all the comments say that this was a squib, and it was all the shooters fault for not identifying it and checking the barrel (there are also quite a few people that seem to think it is possible the load 2 or 3 rounds into the chamber at a time by repeatedly pulling the charging handle, but this is Youtube after all). But I don't think it was, as on the first misfire there was only the click of the hammer, and when he pulled the bolt back a round was ejected which wouldn't have been chambered if the previous &amp;quot;bang&amp;quot; was a squib. I've never fired a round with primer but no powder, but surely there would still be an audible &amp;quot;bang&amp;quot; rather than just the click of the hammer? When exactly did the bullet get stuck in the barrel, or am I missing something? Regardless, I would never use ammo I hadn't loaded myself, particularly not done by a friend of a friend.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:33, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it's safe to say that the idea of unintentionally loading 2 or 3 rounds into the chamber of an M16 rifle is an overstatement and pretty much absurd (I've NEVER heard of such a thing happening with the M16 rifles). But one person's explanation in the comments is that when the hammer struck the primers of the &amp;quot;squib&amp;quot; rounds, the 'click' in question was the popping of the primer, which popped with enough force to lodge the bullets into the barrel of the gun, but without the 'bang' sound since the powder of the &amp;quot;squib&amp;quot; rounds were bad. So when the explosion happened, it was because the hammer struck a perfectly fine round, or one with enough charge in it's powder load, and that bullet impacted the other bullets stuck in the barrel, which caused a high-pressure situation ending with the magazine blowing apart, and leaving the M16 rifle damaged (probably for good). Talk about good craftsmanship going to waste! But at least the shooter in the video was not injured in any way. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 05:51, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I could be wrong as have never done it myself (I am not a moron) but I am fairly sure that a primer going off with no powder in the round makes a louder noise than just a click, which is all that is heard in this video. Anyone know how loud just the primer from a .223 would be?  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:05, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Apparently [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pS1K1zJQhOQ this] is a .308 primer. Now bear in mind how far down the audio is turned (as you don't have to wear ear protection when he fires), I can ''kinda'' see that might end up sounding like a click. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:52, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yeah, most of the time all cameras (except for maybe the professional ones used by filmmakers) capture certain sounds differently. It is possible for the primers of &amp;quot;squib&amp;quot; rounds to discharge with enough force to lodge the bullets into the barrel of whatever gun it's fired from (and sometimes it will stay there until the owner disassembles their weapon and removes the lodged bullet), and most of the time, the &amp;quot;popping&amp;quot; sound of the primers sounds like a &amp;quot;click&amp;quot; when captured on a camera similar to the one used in the video of the M16 blowing up in that guy's face. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 00:28, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've seen this video before, looks like the guy was pulling a half-assed SPORTS drill several times while the weapon was malfunctioning on him. But yeah, shooting custom-loaded ammo with no reliable means of quality control is definitely not a good idea, as this video clearly demonstrates. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 23:52, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not working ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the M16 page not working. It locks up my computer, and the network wont respond. It takes about 5 to 10 minutes before it will work.[[User:Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be your browser and / or RAM is having trouble with the size of it; this is the largest page on the site. What's the spec of your PC? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:03, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Difference between original M16 and M16A2==&lt;br /&gt;
I know how to distinguish XM16E1s, M16A1s, and M16A4s from each other, but how are both the M16 and the M16A2 different visually? Both rifles have no forward assist or removable carrying handles and the M16 can also appear with a &amp;quot;birdcage&amp;quot; flash hider. - [[User:Kenny99|Kenny99]] 00:34, 6 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16-SP1-30Mag.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|M16 aka SP1 (flat &amp;quot;slab side receiver&amp;quot;) with an A1 &amp;quot;birdcage&amp;quot; Flash hider - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|M16A2 Rifle - 5.56x45mm.  Select Fire rifle (Safe/Semi/3 round Burst Only).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll try.  Also with the caveat that I have to replace the movie M16s on the site.  An IMFDB member whom I am eternally grateful for, pointed out that I had A2 lowers on A1 uppers.  Though that works, it's also not correct.  I have to replace the M16 pics with exact versions of each one, but that will take time.  I just point this out to make sure that people know I'm aware of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) M16: original USAF contract in Vietnam and in the U.S.  slab side upper and lower, 1st pattern duckbill three prong flash hider, original buttstock with foldable rear sling swivel.  Early models had counter-turning screws in stead of pivot pins to attach the upper and lower receiver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) XM16E1: 2nd pattern three prong flash hider, Chromed bolt, exposed mag release button (no ribbing) but there is a partial rib for the front pivot detent pin and spring, old M16 style buttstock and rear sling swivel, tear drop forward assist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) M16A1: Birdcage Flash hider, Phosphate bolt but chromed chamber, mag release button ribbing to protect against accidental mag dump and full ribbing to the front pivot detent pin and spring, A1 style buttstock with fixed rear sling swivel (with stowaway compartment in the buttplate)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) M16A2: A2 style flash hider with no holes on the lower part, ring washer instead of lock washer, heavy barrel, round forearm, full ribbing on mag release button and front pivot detent pin and spring, front part of lower receiver is beefier and thicker as well as the rear part near the base of the tube ring.  Updated and longer (by about 1&amp;quot;) rear  buttstock and thicker buttplate, slight finger ledge on the pistol grip about midway down.  Adjustable rear sights with elevation control as well as side to side.  A2 does NOT have a detachable carry handle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope this helps.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 02:26, 6 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't forget that the M16A2 has semi/3-round burst as opposed to semi/full auto in the M16 (though you rarely see this feature used on-screen as most directors feel the full auto looks better than a 3-round burst). [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 04:15, 6 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
No versions of the M16 has screws rather than push pins at the front of the receiver. The only rifles that have these are the Sporter 1 rifles (which is what all of the pictures on the main page are actually of). The M16s that pre-date the captive push pin (Models 601 and 602) have a large headed push pin that is held in place by a ball detent on the pin itself. Also, the &amp;quot;M16&amp;quot; category can be separated out into 3 different guns which the USAF used seqeuntially in turn. First is the original 601 which has green furniture, original &amp;quot;duckbill&amp;quot; flash hider and triangular charging handle (around 14,500 were made, 8,500 to USAF, 1,000 to the Army for evaluation and the rest to special forces, police, and a number of Asian countries). The 602 is the quintessential slab sided M16, and introduced the updated 3 pronged flash hider, black furniture, the current &amp;quot;T&amp;quot; shaped charging handle. The third &amp;quot;M16&amp;quot; is what is often called the USAF M16 and was the most produced variant, and was the Model 604. Early versions had the M16E1 type partial fence lower, whilst the later versions had the M16A1 full fence lower, and these weapons continued to be used by Air Force until 2001, when all M16s were updated to the A2 standard.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 06:58, 6 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cool!  Thanks [[User:Commando552|commando552]]  As I've said before, I pulled movie armory weapons.  Very rarely do I get access to actual firearms museums, but then 99% of the full auto guns were probably sporter conversions, since it was much easier to convert a title I to a class III gun prior to 1986.  I have a LONG laundry list of photos to update thanks to you guys! ;)  But the information helps.  Also only in recent months have i realized how many franken guns were built in the 1970s/80s and 90s on the M16 platform.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 22:24, 21 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pics of the different M16s I mentioned above:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colt 601.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Colt Model 601 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colt 602.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Colt Model 602 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USAF Colt Model 604.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Colt Model 604 (USAF M16) - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:48, 6 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Historical Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone knows why XM177 never dropped the 'X' letter in it? If 'X' usually implies the prototype and testing stage, then why did XM177 have it with both upgrades and use in service, and the jamming M16s in Vietnam didn't? Or some other reasons? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:02, 23 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ignoring the USAF rifles  (which got official GAU designations) the US Army only purchased  a few thousand XM177s and the kinks were never really ironed out, so it is fair to call it an XM program still. Rifle was still in development stages really when US Army cut the funding due to Vietnam war involvement being scaled back..  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:27, 23 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Were the Colt Commandos used in Somalia much more refined versions of XM177 program? If yes, I wonder why they were not put back in official service... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:19, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you have a pic of them, not sure what rifles you are talking about. If you are talking about the Model 733, that is not really related to the XM177s. US forces purchased a small number of Model 733s for Special Forces and was called the M16A2 commando, although Colt later offered it as the M4 Commando. Rangers and Delta in Somalia also used both Model 723s (A1 rear sight a straight barrel) and 727s (A2 rear sight with M4 profile barrel) and these weapons were known initially as M16A2 carbines, before morphing into the M4. Till the early 90s there were still some Model 653s (called the M16A1 carbine) and XM177s with the long moderators replaced with birdcages knocking around as well, so there were probably a lot of different guns knocking around Somalia. These guns were not refinements though, they were guns from the 60/70s that were still being used due to the fact that the US Army did not produce a standard issue carbine till the M4. I'm not even gonna mention the franken-guns that would  have been used by the USAF special forces at the time. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:08, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, thanks, that explains it. [http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_123/449652_going_for_a_1993_Somalia_car15_build_and_need_your_help.html Here are the various photos]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:26, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt Carbine/Model 653/Model 727/Model 733 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, forgive my ignorance in things regarding the variety of AR-15 models. In the model description it says that it was 'never adopted formally by the US Military, and thus never had an &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;XM&amp;quot; designation.' However, in the following section where it lists the movies in which we can find this rifle it is often found as the M653. Can someone more knowledgeable either clear up why there is this discrepancy? Thanks --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 18:34, 23 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Editors (and video game developers) often confuse the 'Model', 'M' and 'MK' designations. M653 should be changed to Model 653. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:14, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Correct. Model &amp;quot;___&amp;quot; is the official COLT designation and usually comes first.  Only when the weapon is adopted as an official front line weapon does it get the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; designation.  And all these minutia of details in the weapons history STILL gives me a headache! ;)  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 03:01, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So does that mean we need to clean up this section to take all the 'M's away?--[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 08:11, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've replaced the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot;s with Models  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:22, 24 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt Model 978 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I took this from Wikipedia, so it might be wrong.''' A lot of video games like to portray the M4A1 with additional burst mode. I read that the Colt Model 978 (a.k.a. &amp;quot;M4 Carbine Enhanced&amp;quot;) is an M4 that features a S-1-3-F trigger group. I wonder how popular this variant was/is and most importantly when was it finalized and released? (if it was ever) - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:15, 25 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The four position fire selector weapons were adopted by nobody as far as I know, with the exception of Greece who bought the Model 778 (don't know how widespread this was, have just seen a few in some pics), which is basically a Model 727 with the four position selector. You can actually buy parts for a four position selectors, sears and disconnectors from Colt, so guns can be modified to this standard. However, I guarantee you that no guns in games actually have the correct four position selector, as it looks different to the standard one. Can't find any pics right now, but the four position selector is a flat plate with a ridge along the centre that ends in an odd knurled dome, sort of like a citrus juicer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have also heard of US Special Forces having the four posiiton M4A1s (Model 978), but may just be rumors, and if true there are very few of them and certainly not widespread. They could also be modifications to standard M4s. Below is a pic of the side of a Model 738 M4 Commando Enhanced (Model 733 with the four position selector) showing the selector switch design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:37, 25 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:Colt Model 738.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Colt Model 738 &amp;quot;M4 Commando Enhanced&amp;quot; fire selector.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Which games portray the M4A1 with additional burst mode, for example? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:40, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ghost Recon features the normal A1 and the &amp;quot;M4 SOCOM&amp;quot; which has the bonus burst mode. Same in The Sum of All Fears game (both Tom Clancy games). Cannot think of any other games right now. (Maybe I was a little exaggerating when I wrote &amp;quot;a lot of&amp;quot; since in most games you can't even toggle the rof.) So, according to what commando552 wrote, it is possible that the M4A1 with S-1-3-F group in Ghost Recon was intentional, since you control a (fictional) U.S. special force. (And the correct trigger groups: We (at least I) don't take the selectors into account, since in most games you cannot even see them, or are set to safe while the gun goes all rock&amp;amp;roll.)- [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 07:55, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, yeah, the universe of Tom Clancy is the one where the prototypes and ultra rare things come true, including weapons and vehicles, so the presence of AR-15-type firearm with four-position selector switch shouldn't come as surprise ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:48, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bozitojugg3rn4ut, the selector really should be taken into account, as apart from the receiver markings the selector switch is the only external difference between the regular Colt carbines and the Enhanced version with burst and auto. If it has the regular fire selector and lacks the markings on the receiver, then it is simply and M4 with the wrong fire control group. Is very hard to tell from the Ghost Recon screen shots as there aren't any of the relevant side, but you can just make out that there are only 3 positions marked on the right side of the receiver, making the physical model that of a regular M4/M4A1 rather than an Enhanced M4.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:09, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 issues:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Shouldn't it be called AR-15, since ArmaLite AR-15 is the weapon that started it all?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) There is at least 1 not-rifle on the page: [[M16 rifle series#Colt 9mm Submachine Gun|Colt 9mm Submachine Gun]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:58, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, AR-15 makes much more sense to me. I would call the page &amp;quot;AR-15 Variants&amp;quot;, gets rid of the problem that &amp;quot;M16&amp;quot; is only relevant 5 or 6 of the 30 or so guns on the page, and the fact that rifle is not necessarily the correct term for all of them.  I'm not sure how the site mechanics work, but would changing the name of the page create a massive problem for the 1000+ pages that link here, or would the redirects sort it all out?  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 12:44, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Need to contact admins and ask them about this. I support your version, as more appropriate one. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:17, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though you are technically correct, M16 is the most widely recognized nomenclature for the weapons that appear in films. Remember that we are not a gun encyclopedia, we are a weapons in MOVIE/TV/et al wiki.  Sure, we utilized those rules of starting with the original weapon when it came to more obscure weapons (like grouping the R4s in with the Galils), but really famous weapons have their own pages, weapons that a firmly entrenched with their own identity in the mind of the movie going public. We also did not start a StG-44 page and then branch the AK-47s out from that even though the AKs obviously were a stepchild of the StG-44 Design theory.  Very rarely are guns 'presented' as AR-15s in media.  In fact many movie goers don't even recognize the term. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 18:13, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't remember many movies where the character says: &amp;quot;Here is my M16!&amp;quot; or where the weapon is listed in closing credits :\&lt;br /&gt;
::::The reason for AK-47 not being on the same page as StG-44 is having completely different design. AK-47 was ''inspired'' by StG project, nothing more. There are a lot of weapons that bear a ''resemblance'' to AK-47 or AR-15 but have different design and thus their own page. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:29, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''P.S.''' Imagine IMFDB consisting of pages: ''&amp;quot;M1911&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;Desert Eagle&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;MP5&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;Garand&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;M14&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;M16&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;AK-47&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;Everything Else&amp;quot;'' :D&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now, [http://kingshamus.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/official.jpg THIS] made me laugh xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:34, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is the point of the Colt 9mm SMG? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every time I look at it just seems so useless. I mean, why would anyone want what is essentially an M4 that does less damage with less range? Recoil would be lower I presume, but I cant see an M4 having a gigantic amount of recoil. I'm sure someone could help provide me with some insight but at the moment I'm finding it very hard pressed to find a purpose of this thing. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 14:20, 14 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495222</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495222"/>
		<updated>2011-12-12T04:46:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Just some silliness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dammit. I am disappoint. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:46, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495221</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495221"/>
		<updated>2011-12-12T04:45:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* BTK Weapons */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::lol yeah all those functional Spartan Lasers we have lying around. Though it would be cool to see an NTW-20 in a videogame. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:45, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can't kick, this animation only happens when your character vaults over a low lying object, like a guardrail or a rock. -- Long Fallen 22:44, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Page Status / More Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amazed me how long the game's been out yet there's still not very many images of all the weapons :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked all the multiplayer weapons, but unfortunately don't have a capture card for my PS3, which I think is moot since most of the current images look like they were taken on the PC's level of detail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of right now I love the current format the MP7's listing is in, showing off the accessories it can mount at one time, while also showing off each part of the reload animation. It would also be nice if each listing had the weapon's simple ironsights as the first image, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, we need to make this image complete :D A game like this doesn't deserve to have such a barren imfdb page... -- Long Fallen 22:40, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495217</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495217"/>
		<updated>2011-12-12T04:37:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Just some silliness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 22:37, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495215</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=495215"/>
		<updated>2011-12-12T04:36:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Just some silliness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't change it. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:28, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just some silliness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't feel like uploading tons of screens for the page today so I'll put these up just for fun.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Falcon Kick!.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Falcon Kick!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''Damn, those alien bastards are gonna pay for shooting up my ride.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Duke Nukem-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|'''I'm gonna kick your ass, bitch!''']]&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:00, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if the kick could actually have been used as a combat move like in '''F.E.A.R.''' or '''Mirror's Edge''' (also made by EA DICE) :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:42, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More pictures with included silliness are always welcome to me :D If we could make pictures with captions as hilarious as the ones on the Far Cry 2 page, I would always come to the BF3 page whenever I'm in a bad mood xD -- Long Fallen 22:11, 11 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, how do you kick?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Pattinson&amp;diff=494617</id>
		<title>Talk:Robert Pattinson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Pattinson&amp;diff=494617"/>
		<updated>2011-12-10T19:39:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This page helps get rid of another red name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AND HE'S HOT!!!! - [[User:Losername|Losername]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi sis. God I hate ''[[Twilight]]''. Feel free to link the other actors on that page, I doubt anyone else on here will. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok no problem. And you know I hate the movie too I just love Robert Pattinson. -[[User:Losername|Losername]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Does he even know what a gun is? I'd love to shoot them at him, but i doubt that he needs a page. [[User:The Winchester|The Winchester]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Barring any unforeseen events, I find it hard to imagine that he ''won't'' be seen with a gun in future movies, given that he is a rising star. --MCTales 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Seriously...has this guy been anywhere close to even touching a firearm in any movie he has been in?  Why is this page here?  --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 12:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Johnny's sister thinks he is hot. John couldn't to anything bad to her so he let her make those pages. I think he looks like a foot.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 16:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hahaha-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 21:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone mind saying why the picture of him is of a movie where he never even touches a gun?[[User:Bristow8411|Bristow8411]] 15:13, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hopefully, it's just a placeholder. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 15:45, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I dont know guys, it could very well be possible. I mean if Lindsey Lohan held a Model 500 then Robert Dreamboat Pattinson could very well use a gun. Plus, aside from Twilight, he's actually not that bad an actor. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:39, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey there everyone i was just introduceing myself here im  a first time visitor who hopes to become a daily reader!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=494614</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=494614"/>
		<updated>2011-12-10T19:24:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Changing Descriptions in screenshots. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See [[Talk:Battlefield 3/Archive 1]] for older discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why am I not surprised? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of me isn't too surprised that the CODMW3 article would be taken off the Work in Progress Status in a much shorter time than BF3's page. Personally I think MW3 committed a war crime with how atrocious the M16A4 looks both in the first person and 3rd person models of it. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:00, 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just the M16? :/ Hell, the P99 is the only pistol where they didn't get something wrong. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:14, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has more to do with the fact that MW3 makes more mistakes and therefore is far more fun to write about. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:18, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal favourite screw up in MW3 has to be the Skorpion's scope rail mount, with the &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; as a close runner up. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:02, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still mad about the fact they suddenly decided that it'll better that the M4A1 will have a 20-round magazine rather than a 30-round magazine -_- --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:05, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lol good points all around. I'm not too knowledgeable on everything but I'm in the service and I use the M16A4 often. So it stuck out like a sore thumb the moment I picked up the rifle in the game that something was really freaking off about it. Like it wasn't already bad having 30 rounds come out of a 20 round mag. But bolt on rails to A2 Handguards? Really?! XDDD I don't know how accurate that P99 is, but it irks the hell out of me seeing it held one handed in the First Person Model. [[User:DarkSamuraiX1999|DarkSamuraiX1999]] 00:25 16 November 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya know? It's funny that the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; they are using military advisers to make the game better in &amp;quot;tactics&amp;quot; and stuff (yeah, right), this military advisers or what ever, aren't aware of the way the developers model the weapons and doesn't 100% reassemble to the real life one's :/ I guess the developers tell them &amp;quot;We don't really give a damn about realism, just tell us how the hell modern warfare works&amp;quot;... Still, the guys of BF3 made a bit better, though it does have also many things unrealistic, like the fact Marines are using M16A3's instead of M16A4's, and some of them running with an M240 like it a was wooden gun. Sigh. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 02:57, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The thing about an advisor is that his job is to answer questions. It's up to the developers if they a) ask him the right questions and b) pay attention to his answers. I believe ''Star Trek's'' science advisors have publically complained that they're only asked for advice on what terminology to use and never on whether something is actually good science. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:15, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing SP Campaign of BF3 proves is that BF3 shouldn't have SP Campaign in the first place. One would expect it to be more authentic, yet it takes approach of CoD: &amp;quot;We just put randomly weapons we have in MP whether or not they fit in&amp;quot;. So suddenly we have Marines with M16A3s and M240Bs (instead of M16A4s and M240Gs), insurgents (exactly insurgents and not organized militia from pre-alpha trailers) with AK-74Ms and AEK-971s (instead of AK-47s / AKMs), Spetsnaz member Vladimir with 5.56 A-91 (despite Russian forces simply not using this caliber even for SF), etc. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:27, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's not forget that the protagonist of the game, Blackburn, during the interrogations scenes, you can see his name and branch tags that they're in white and straight rather than MARPAT and in an angle with the chest pockets. Also, one of the the guys in Blackburn's team, though I can't remember his exact name (the guy who carries M136 all the time), wears MultiCam OCP, still, rather than MARPAT uniform. Eventually, war games wouldn't be realistic as real life, even in the small parts. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:22, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Except my games (If I ever make games). :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:34, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, they (Marines) get CAS from Little Birds. Apparently, to the game devs the terms 'US Army' and 'USMC' are interchangeable. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:50, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't recall the insurgents using AEK-971s in the Iran missions, usually it was a random stew of your typical AKS-74u, AK-74M (don't real militants from the former Soviet bloc use the more modern 5.45 AK-74 at times?), RPKs, and the KH2002. However, the terrorists with Solomon from later on in the story do use all this, and even more somewhat outlandish equipment. Also, since the page is incomplete, can you explain to me how you identify the Marine's M16 models as the A3 versions? During the campaign I recall Blackburn's M16 as being able to fire in fully automatic. (Except that one mission where you inexplicably jump off with an HK416) Also, didn't Vladimir use the AS VAL throughout the Spetsnaz missions? And although it's not top-notch realistic Ala ''The Hurt Locker'', I wouldn't exactly outright call it the CoD approach. I mean, just look at what they did with Black Ops. Pointing out every inaccuracy in that game is to the point of turning it into a drinking game. Long Fallen 17:49, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Other than that one HK416 Blackburn had, which was odd, if they worst things the Marines had were M16A3s instead of A4s and M240Bs instead of M240Gs, then I'm happy enough. And the PLR only had 74Ms, 74Us, and RPKs if I remember correctly, the later enemies had AEKs. All the weird guns were given to Kaffarov's private army, as he is an arms dealer. It's like complaining you see a few M1928s instead of M1A1s in a WWII movie. Black Ops.. is Black Ops, and MW3 had FADs in the hands of African militia... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:20, 16 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe it is related to the &amp;quot;AKS-74U vs. UMP issue&amp;quot;: in some of the videos of &amp;quot;Operation Swordbreaker&amp;quot;, inside of the building, leading to anti-sniper position, one of the insurgents is certainly equipped with AEK-971, with others having AKS-74U and AK-74M (AK-74 would be correct for former Soviet bloc militant but not AK-74M unless he managed to scavenge it from Russian soldier). For M16A3, check one of the Marines on the way to bridge in the same mission. And while Kiril used the AS &amp;quot;Val&amp;quot;, Vladimir used the 5.56 A-91. And yes, as Alex said, Black Ops... is Black Ops *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are right, that one insurgent always has an AEK, but that's an exception. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:31, 17 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidearms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone else noticed Campo carries ''two'' sidearms, one on his chest and one by his hip? Looks like two Glocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Glock-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ten more and he'll be a Glockenspiel.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:18, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but that caption was just too good. On topic however, it seems as if the handgun holstered on his chest seems pretty low res to be made out. Could it be a designer oversight or something? - Long Fallen 17:21, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they are copying Epps from [[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]], he nonsensically carries a pair of Glocks in the same way as well...  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:31, 18 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that's the Assault kit's chest, with the Glock and all, so they most likely gave him a leg holster and forgot about that one. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:01, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's like in MW2 where the snipers carry unusable M1911. Although it is peculiar that the Marine in this game carries unusable  Glock and not M9 or MEU(SOC). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:17, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BTK Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:MG36 and Jackhammer? Guess the XM8 and plasma rifle will be in the next DLC. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:30, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess that confirms that there will be no PLA Faction DLC *sadface* I still hope for EU Faction :|&lt;br /&gt;
:Also confirmed that HK53 is back intact :)&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:33, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why do they choose to include the &amp;quot;HK&amp;quot; prefix in the HK53, but not on the M416? [[User:Santos|Santos]] 11:26, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll ask Demize why this HK is okay (and the HK21 in BF2). Actually, they hinted they might do more weapon DLCs later, so I'm expecting a &amp;quot;Back To Bad Company&amp;quot; pack with all three XM8s and other stuff. Also, not a plasma rifle, but I've always thought it'd be cool to see Halo guns in another game, the human ones. For those of you that don't know, they all make functional sense. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:48, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, I need to check if the RPK-74 has a flash hider. If not, with wood furniture and a ribbed metal magazine, it's actually an RPK with a sight rail, not a -74 at all. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:10, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe I didn't spend enough time using it, but I remember it having black furniture. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:44, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Checking my PS3 video captures it's very dark brown; more to the point, though, it's got that standard AK-style handguard with two holes through the middle (with a RIS foregrip sticking out the bottom, admittedly); the -M polymer handguard is a different shape and has ridges all along the top of the gas tube. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:Soviet RPK-74.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK-74 light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|601px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:BF3-RPK-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If it doesn't have a flash hider, I think that makes it an RPK. I thought I could see one there, but in my PS3 video it looks like it doesn't have one and the in-world and pickup models don't have one either. I was going to say &amp;quot;except the scope mount&amp;quot; but MPM's RPK image has one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Image:RPK lmg.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK Light Machine Gun with 40 round magazine - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is this normal? From what I'd read the scope bracket was an -M thing. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:35, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for clearing up the RPK differences, as for the scope rail, scopes are nice to have sometimes, I'm sure some of the older RPKs were fitted with scope mounts as aftermarket parts in real life. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:06, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As the RPK in the game only has the bracket fitted when a sight is there, I would certainly put it in the &amp;quot;aftermarket&amp;quot; category.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:37, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, just like the AKS-74U becomes an AKS-74UN when mounted with optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:47, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just to assure you this ''does'' happen (it's so nice having a PS3 video of half the game to pull shots from): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Image:BF3-RPKForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:RPK with inexplicable foregrip. I'd just forgotten they don't all have that. Also, is it just me or is the scope mounting screwed to the side of the dust cover rather than attached to a bracket? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Single Action Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you guys know, as stated on its page it is called Single Action Army on this site as there are so many nearly identical replicas calling it the more correct Colt 1873 might actually be wrong, and SAA is used as a catch-all term. However, just as we assume a full-size Glock is a 17 unless we can tell otherwise, we also assume a gun in a game is not a clone, unless we can tell otherwise. Therefore, it is assumed that the drawing of the SAA is the original Colt 1873, and should be named as such. This is just to avoid an edit war, or something. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M224 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about Xbox, but on the PS3 the M224 definitely has an M7 baseplate in multiplayer. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 15:54, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, it has one on 360. Lol at the baseplate having a designation :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to change it, I was going off it not having one in single. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:31, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kaffarov's Private Army ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I understand that Kaffarov is an arms dealer, it boggles my mind how so many times in fiction there are people who are able to procure such military spec equipment like the F2000, Mk.17 (SCAR-H), AEK-971, and so many others. Surely the companies and or countries that produce them don't freely sell them to whatever buyers there are? My question is how would people like Kaffarov even be able to avoid the system and acquire such equipment? I don't know if it has been answered elsewhere, or for obvious reasons '''hasn't''', but it's just something that I haven't been able to explain logically. -- Long Fallen 18:03, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reminds me of [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Legionnaire Legionnaire] from [http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company Battlefield: Bad Company]. And that guy paid his mercenaries in ''gold bars'', mind you. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Kaffarov... Makarov... Kaffarov... Makarov... Is it only me or does BF3 is trying to copy MW3 in many matters? :/ --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 23:29, 19 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Um, what's so suspicious about Russian (or Russified) surname ending in -ev or -ov? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:51, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure either, but it lets us have the cool guns people don't really use, so it gets a pass in my books. Also, those two names aren't really that similar, and the characters are nothing alike. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:12, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer the question, no. Any customer who could afford top-drawer equipment would be dealing directly with the company that made it, the kinds of people who go to dodgy arms dealers want weapons that are simple enough to equip illiterate militiamen with, cheap enough to equip a ''lot'' of them with, and have widely available spare parts and ammunition. It's no longer the era when unpaid former Soviet commanders would empty entire arms depots onto the black market and flee to countries that don't have extradition treaties with Russia, and no longer the era when you could get a superpower to pony up a whole bunch of equipment and training just by saying you were fighting for / against communism. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:46, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I see, but I recall this story from a few years back -[http://www.expatica.com/be/news/local_news/factory-tightens-security-after-gun-thefts-23226.html Stolen Five-seveNs from FNH factories] (I had no idea the P90 was a handgun xD) - And then there's this too -[http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081112_worrying_signs_border_raids Mexican drug cartels being armed with P90s and Five-seveNs] So I still want to know, what are the likely chances of seeing terrorists with such equipment? I mean, these articles seem to bring it to light. (Sorry if I'm going off topic) -- Long Fallen 00:42, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With Mexico it's a situation where a lot of the top-class armament is purchased in the United States and smuggled across the border; similar arrangements were used to smuggle arms to the IRA during The Troubles in Northern Ireland. That's the &amp;quot;buying directly from the supplier&amp;quot; kind of deal, and is usually done without a dealer acting as an intermediary (because the Cartels have enough money to do it themselves, or take the weapons in part payment for supplying product to drug dealers). Your typical Eastern Bloc / African arms dealer just buys up weapons somewhere a war is ending and ships them to where a war is still going on, because the buyers don't have the contacts, legitimacy or resources to do it by themselves. A lot of the guns these guys circulate have been involved in local conflicts for years or even decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Top-end hardware typically comes from governments and organisations. Insurgents in Iraq didn't get top-of-the-line anti-tank weapons and training in making IEDs from some guy in the business of moving weapons, they got them from sympathisers in places like Iran. Alarmism about what ''kind'' of weapons terrorists have is pretty foolish anyway, since generally they prefer the instant, indiscriminate destruction of explosives to trying to shoot people with a gun. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:58, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see, thanks for enlightening me :) -- Long Fallen 20:25, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever said &amp;quot;a lot of the top-class armament...blah blah Mexico... smuggled from US...&amp;quot; is rather wrong. The Mexican cartels who have P90s and M16s and etc western weaponry are getting it from the Mexican military and police, only a small percentage of the guns near the US border are actually smuggled in to Mexico from the US. The numbers seem higher because recently Mexico has been sending in stores of arms they have confiscated over the past X amount of years (that they know can be most likely traced to the US) to get traced at the same time. This leads to a overblown number that looks good on anti-firearms pamphlets. If you think about it a bit, what do you think would be easier and cheaper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Finding and paying someone to buy 10 semi-automatic guns in the US at ridiculous prices, risking him getting caught, losing your money, going through all the background checks, etc, then sneaking them over the border. Not to mention finding ammo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2a. Paying some guerrillas in some SA country x amount of dope to bring in a ship, container, truck, or plane full of 100s or 1000s of eastern bloc or former US military weaponry, that is most likely going to be fully automatic. Plus large quantities of ammo for said weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2b. Stealing or buying from a corrupt military/ police official brand new weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;X% of guns in Mexico are from the US&amp;quot; myth is a fallacy created by the Mexican and US govts and heavily compounded by the ATF smuggling them themselves or letting them walk, and the FBI for not laying out the specifics of the stats. Then the subsequent (ratings improving) media hype compounds it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not saying it doesn't happen, just that it is greatly exaggerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for how someone like Kaffarov would get the weaponry, its pretty simple. 1. Start a (possibly dummy) corporation (possibly in a different country). 2. Buy from a manufacturer saying they are intended for &amp;quot;security&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;, or hell, even arming your own &amp;quot;PMC&amp;quot;. 3.Lock and load. How do you think PMCs such as Xe (Blackwater), AirScan, Aegis DS, etc.. get their new &amp;quot;HSLD&amp;quot; weaponry? Most international arms trafficking treaties do not extend to selling firearms to private entities in the same way they do governments.&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully, the (somewhat intoxicated)-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 02:33, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wasn't saying it's the majority source, just the source of the more pricey / modern equipment. These people have supply networks that move ''tons'' of drugs across the border, they're not going to consider moving guns in the other direction a substantial risk; one would imagine their US buyers are probably the same people who buy their drugs, considering they're already going to be smuggling stuff back as payment and keeping their activities secret. Most of the weapons they get from the US aren't purchased legally (the big myth is they're bought legitimately from normal gun stores, SO WE MUST CLAMP DOWN ON THIS). Most of their stuff is indeed bought in from other sources, but weapons like the Barretts aren't going to be coming from just anywhere, and there ''is'' precedent from this happening in Northern Ireland where the IRA got a lot of their best weapons from Irish expatriates in America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for Kaffarov, the main problem with the mythical top-end arms dealer is who he's supposed to sell these rare weapons on to, not how he'd get them himself. Sure, if it's ''just'' equipment for his private troops he might splash out, but he wouldn't be wholesaling in exotic arms with rare ammo and parts because nobody would buy them, plus he'd have problems with the companies he's buying from wondering why their weapons are suddenly turning up in conflict zones in the exact quantity they're selling them to his shell company. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 22 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know who! He's obviously selling to the Russian Army, Brazilian and African militants, and Makarov's terrorists in MW2 and MW3! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:32, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: From what I remember in the BF3 novel Kaffarov was a former GRU agent handling weapons and training with then political ally Iran, who got too deep in the local agendas and was probably compromised. IN the novel his weapons were less new (Uzis and shit), but I could totally buy that Kaffarov was still connected enough to Russia's arms trade that he could probably weasel crates of AEK971s out of them without too much trouble. Supposedly that's how Solomon got the suitcase nukes in the first place anyway, off Kaffarov. (as a note the book's plot is little more coherent than the game, probably worth the pickup if you're trying to dissect the game's narrative.)--[[User:Toadie|Toadie]] 04:17, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This entire discussion is clearly a case of thinking way harder about what Kaffarov is hypothetically capable of procuring for his men than DICE did while they were working on the game. As for the whole &amp;quot;Mexico Gun Smuggling Debate&amp;quot; - try reading some academic reports on the subject before claiming that the statistics were cooked up ([http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Chapter%206-%20U.S.%20Firearms%20Trafficking%20to%20Mexico,%20New%20Data%20and%20Insights%20Illuminate%20Key%20Trends%20and%20Challenges.pdf Wilson Centre: U.S Firearms Trafficking to Mexico] is a long read, but it does illuminate the various ways guns are smuggled and how they are interdicted)  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 16:41, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well look at the  Libyan civil war were both sides were able to get massive amounts of G-36s --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 20:38, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the weapons such as Barretts, M16s, etc.. are coming from the Mexican military. As for the IRA in the 80s I know all about that, that was a different time. Many things happened back then that could not happen now. Plus the IRA stopped getting guns from the US when they realized it was easier to get them from places like Palestine and etc..&lt;br /&gt;
With Libya... well HK is in deep right now for selling to some state police in Mexico that they shouldn't be selling to, it wouldn't surprise me if they sold to Libya and other places.&lt;br /&gt;
And Markit, the report you linked to actually states in a couple places that the reports are skewed by many factors.&lt;br /&gt;
This can state the facts better than I can: http://www.nssf.org/factsheets/PDF/90PercentMyth.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:57, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also an incident during the Georgia-Russia war where Georgian SF were seen with G36s that they previously weren't known to have. HK weapons are turning up in all kinds of strange places. :S [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:28, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@Ranger01 - There's no verifiable proof that all those high-end weapons are coming solely from Mexican law enforcement - last time I checked, they could get better weapons than the FN PS90s, Romanian WASR clones, MAK-90s, AR-15 clones with the post-ban features, SKS rifles with Tapco furniture etc. that have been turning up in seizures of cartel arsenals. I know that the 90% statistic was erroneous, but I also do not believe that the percentage is only 12% according to your report (extrapolating only from serial numbers is faulty in itself when criminals usually take measures to remove/modify them). Besides, the &amp;quot;most deadliest weapons come from Central America&amp;quot; does not equal &amp;quot;most of the weapons come from Central America&amp;quot;, which seems to be the tack that your article is taking. Also erroneous is the claim that Mexican military personnel are defecting and taking &amp;quot;American-made&amp;quot; weapons with them - the &amp;quot;150,000&amp;quot; figure was for desertions (which take place for any number of reasons in a conscription-based system) and most soldiers are armed with Mexican-produced versions of H&amp;amp;K weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On an additional note, the G36s that were seen in Libya were likely a gray market sale - a firm buys the weapons with the end user certificate for one country, ships them there, then transfers them to the actual destination. A more controversial story would be that FN directly sold several hundred FN 2000s, FN 303s and P90s to Libya in 2009-2010.  --[[User:Markit|Markit]] 18:32, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Politics aside, F2000s would be ''great'' for a desert country; they're almost airtight. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:22, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Saudi Arabia did adopt the F2000 as their standard rifle. -- Long Fallen 21:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, didn't know that. As probably most of us are, I haven't had hands on on most of these, but am well read on them, and the F2000 would be one of my first choices of assault rifle if I had a country/army :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:51, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now it's just a matter or wondering if they'll ever get around to using them... Sad is the day when hundreds of beautiful F2000s sit untouched in Arabian armories, gathering up dust. It's enough to bring a tear to any IMFDB user's eye xD -- Long Fallen 02:43, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Researchers point to '''Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3''' being replaced with '''Steyr AUG''' in Saudi Arabian Army[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_standard_infantry_rifle_for_saudi_arabian_army][http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110305182603AA3EBn4] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:13, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So the SA National Guard bought the 55,000 F2000s... but the AUG was on issue? Did it replace the AUG? The standard rifle is the G3A3 as of now? A lot of this information feels so outdated. -- Long Fallen 16:19, 27 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Saudi Arabian National Guard is separate from Saudi Arabian Army. An analogy would be 'Waffen-SS' (SANG) and 'Wehrmacht' (SAA)[http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/comments/c424.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:08, 28 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blackburn from BHD ?? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go see the Colt M4 section and the M4 series below it is said that Black burn holds M4 quite often. I would like to ask is this Blackburn any how related to Todd Blackburn from Black Hawk Down, the Ranger who fell from the Black Hawk chopper? - [[S9771773G]] 09:47, 20 November 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I imagine it's just a coincidence, Blackburn is a &amp;quot;heroic&amp;quot; surname like Carver or Slater or whatever. I'd have thought if they were referencing Black Hawk Down they'd have named him after someone like Shughart or Gordon, really. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doubt it. 'Battlefield 3' is unrelated to 'Black Hawk Down', plus, Todd Blackburn is Army Ranger while Henry Blackburn is Marine Recon. Proper analogy would be Patterson's from 'Medal of Honor' series. Both are in Army and [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/Jim_Patterson one] is actually the grandson of [http://medalofhonor.wikia.com/wiki/James_Steven_Patterson another]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:19, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Although, this would explain the appearance of Little Birds...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There's also the fact that Todd Blackburn is a real person while Henry Blackburn is a fictional one. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 20:14, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::True, there is even a page on [http://www.aweekendofheroes.com/vips/todd-blackburn.php Todd Blackburn]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:27, 21 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the link posted by Masterius: &amp;quot;In reality, it is not known why Blackburn lost his grip on the rope and is generally assumed that his inexperience led to his fall ('''However, Master Sergeant Matt Eversmann states that around the time when Blackburn fell, the UH60 canted slightly, and had to put his hand down to stay upright'''. The ranger that roped in after Blackburn also swears that he had grabbed the rope.) Additionally, the film incorrectly portrays Blackburn as a new arrival to Somalia, when in reality he had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um... why would Matt Eversmann have any trouble staying upright in said canting helicopter ''when he was in a Humvee on the ground''? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:22, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/default16.asp Because he was, in fact, in a Blackhawk?] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:00, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''P.S.''' ^ Oh, the age there is said to be 18, and &amp;quot;just months out of a Florida high school&amp;quot;, instead of 20, and &amp;quot;had been in country for the same amount of time as the rest of his Company&amp;quot;. So which of the descriptions is the correct one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::They'd said on the DVD commentary as well as in the History Channel documentary about the raid that Eversmann was with the convoy the whole time. Guess they didn't have their facts straight. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 17:16, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::He was the leader of Chalk Four as shown in the film and was inserted by Black Hawk, callsign Super 67. He didn't go to the crash site as shown in the film though, instead he was part of &amp;quot;The Lost Convoy&amp;quot; carrying the captured prisoners, think that is what you are thinking of.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:36, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An interesting thing I found about Todd Blackburn was that he was born on October 25, the same date that BF3 was released, maybe that date was selected on purpose by DICE? [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 19:34, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now this is intriguing... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:01, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can tell you without any doubts that BF3 has several [[Generation Kill]] references. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The main protagonist is part of the 1st Reconnaissance Battalion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When driving towards Tehran in the humvees and complaining that they signed up for an ambush, the driver says &amp;quot;Frankly gentleman, I'm not hearing the aggression I'd like. Keep scanning&amp;quot;. Which is a reference to the 5th episode &amp;quot;A Burning Dog&amp;quot; when the team leaders are preparing to clear out an ambush by a bridge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- When Henry Blackburn and Co. drives in a convoy to capture Kaffarov the arms dealers. Matkovic, the guy wearing MultiCam OCP and the AT4, was sleeping on the convoy and when woken up he says &amp;quot;thirty four minutes... I've been asleep for thirty four minutes drinking a vanilla milkshake.&amp;quot; Also a reference from the 5th episode A Burning Dog, when Ray Person wakes Brad Colbert to a team leader meeting, Brad responds &amp;quot;fifty six minutes. I've been asleep for fifty six minutes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:00, 20 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to mention the character named Chaffin. There's more, I'll have to play it again to find them all.-protoAuthor 23:16, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M203 Dog tag ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching my new unlocked dog tags on Battlelog, and saw that the 40mm GL proficiency Dog tag has an M203 in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be added to the list of weapons appearing in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://battlelog-cdn.battlefield.com/public/profile/bf3/stats/dogtags/lb/dtb094.png?v=1628729 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes it should, like the SAA. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:29, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, though I would prefer these as full screenshots if possible (ie someone unlocking / viewing them), I never like pages full of different aspect ratios and weird tiny images. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well since we're mentioning weapons appearing on dog tags but not the actual game for usage, the USAS-12 proficiency dog tag has a SPAS-12 silhouette for some reason. It was probably directly ported from Bad Company 2 given how it looks. -- Long Fallen 17:59, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite a number are, the SCAR-H is a SCAR-L. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It actually peeves me that many of the assault rifle proficiency dog tags use the icons for the Bad Company 2 models, like most of the assault rifles equipped with grenade launchers. Especially the F2000 one, which isn't even possible to have an underslung grenade launcher, let alone the EGLM pictured on it. :P -- Long Fallen 21:05, 23 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You'd be wrong about the F2000 not being able to take a grenade launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Image:Fn f2000 3.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|FN F2000 - 5.56x45mm NATO with [[FN EGLM|FN GL1]] - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:38, 24 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry, I should've made it clear that while the dog tag shows off the EGLM, you can't mount any kind of grenade launcher to the F2000 itself to use. -- Long Fallen 00:42, 25 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You mean ''in the game''. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 01:05, 26 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Going Rambo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMcM7OpC2dI&amp;amp;hd=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just how realistic is it? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:02, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they should implement an overheating system for all the light machineguns. Just like in Battlefield 2. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 06:33, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Barrel changes would be more interesting, I think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:32, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And then there will be people complaining that Battlefield is becoming simulator. Rather odd, since magazine system and overheating system were part of the core Battlefield games since the beginning... Sigh, Bad Company... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back to Karkand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's an expansion pack coming out in December, and it's going to have ten new guns and four new vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a list of the weapons that I can absolutely confirm from seeing in the kill-feed in the trailers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MG36 with a top rail instead of the carrying handle/optics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FAMAS (Looks to be the Felin version)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There also looks to be some sort of Kalashnikov style weapon, but it's not shown clearly enough for me to recognize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the trailers if you feel like playing Where's Waldo:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&amp;amp;v=TyN_Zjw4l-s Overall Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjTmieRMKjo Karkand Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emGXp-qRrVg Oman Trailer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note, I have the PC version and just about all the weapons unlocked. I might upload screenshots if I get the chance.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AchingScaphoid|AchingScaphoid]] 08:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they've got the screenshot feature working now, you'll need FRAPS to get screenshots. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:20, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 2 AK variants in the first trailer you posted, I think the first is an [[AKM]], second is the same [[AKS-74U]] with the incorrect milled receiver as seen in the main game.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:37, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The L85 is in the first trailer, although very briefly. 0.37, there's an L85. Old plastic handguard, RIS instead of the 19mm rail. No idea on the optic, other than it not being a SUSAT. --[[User:Spanner|Spanner]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think it might be an Elcan of some sort but not sure. The newest modification to the L85A2 replaces the old rail with a MIL-STD-1913 rail and is fitted with an Elcan Spectre with a piggybacked CCO.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:08, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've also seen real L85s with ACOGs, so using that could be authentic for optics. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:13, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::An ACOG on a MIL-STD-1913 would be incorrect though. British ACOGs have a proprietary mount for the original 19mm rail. Any gun that is fitted with the new rail will be using the ELCAN.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Indeed:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/files/BEMIL069/upload/2008/02/2_acog.jpg L85A2 with ACOG on mount]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee252/TarnishUK/SpecterOS4x.jpg L85A2 with Specter on rail]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:41, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added them to the page, feel free to expand them. This picture was on the Blog a few weeks back, it shows all 10 weapons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/Back_2D00_to_2D00_Karkand_2D00_Assignments.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:12, 29 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:List of all weapons and attachments in BtK expansion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://mp1st.com/2011/11/30/the-complete-list-of-bf3-back-to-karkand-weapons-and-attachments-revealed/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Wikinerd|Wikinerd]] 09:04, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, the best they could manage was photos of someone's TV? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not too sure what to think of the Pancor Jackhammer being in this game, I mean, we've already got the USAS-12 as the automatic shotgun, if they wanted to add in another one, they could've just added in the AA-12. Anyone kinda with me on this? - Long Fallen 14:20, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not a fan of automatic shotguns anyway, since they, technically, overshadow the semi-automatic ones (because of selective fire). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there were only 100 or so MG36s made, but isn't a standard G36 with a bipod foregrip and a double drum mag exactly the same thing? I get that if there's one in a movie it will actually be a G36 with bipod and drum added, but in a game can't it be called an MG36 since it didn't start as something else? Also, it IS an MG, not an AR, unless the RPK, M27, and QBB-95 are ARs too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:21, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:An MG36 has a bipod handguard, C-mag, ''and'' a heavy barrel and reinforced action. This, like basically every other MG36 that has appeared in anything, is based on a standard G36 with a bipod and drum, as the Bundrswehr use. I don't think there's even a specific name for the configuration, but it is ''not'' called MG36. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 16:35, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh okay, but would the heavy barrel look any different externally? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:11, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I believe it's mostly internal. However, IIRC the MG36 was rejected the same year the MIL-STD-1913 standard was drawn up, so an &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with a flat-top rail would have to be a G36 or an after the fact modification of an MG36, and speculating a gun that isn't real ''must'' be modified is trying a little too hard to cover up a simple naming error. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:15, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh okay, well, if it had the standard carry handle I'd say it should be &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot;, but seeing as it has the &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; one, it's a G36 with a bipod, C-Mag, and G36C rail. To be fair though, MG36 is a ''lot'' easier for the sake of the game. On DICE's part I mean. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:10, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex - According to G3Kurz on HKpro, the barrel OD is 30% thicker. http://www.hkpro.com/forum/hk-long-gun-talk/94949-wtk-mg36-barrel-question.html Evil Tim - Where did you hear that it had reinforced action? --[[User:Shadowkungfu|Shadowkungfu]] 22:44, 30 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Kaffarov&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, is this mission always buggy as hell, or did I just have a bad run screencapping it? As well as that weirdness with the Barrett I had guns inheriting the texture of the floor they were on top of (I have a lovely image of a linoleum QJY-88), some pictures of MP7s with their magazine against their front grip and their stock hovering in front of them at ninety degrees to the gun and every single USAS-12 in the level appearing on the ground with no magazine. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:42, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That always seems to happen with USASs and MP7s, but please, please add the linoleum QJY-88 to the main page, just for laughs :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I really didn't get the last level. Why would you hijack a train that was already going to where you want to go (thus drawing attention to yourself for no good reason), then randomly rig it to explode even though you've already got a nuke on board? And why was one man with a detonator standing in the same room as the explosives that detonator set off? And how did Blackburn know that trigger would set off the random bombs and not the nuke? I have questions, dammit. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:54, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're not an operator, you wouldn't understand. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:21, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is my explanation and I know there's several holes in it but bear with me, it makes slightly more sense than just a lack of general explanation. The hijacking of the train was probably a distraction whereby once they got off their intended stop with the nuke, they would send it hurtling somewhere else for the police and other emergency services to follow. This would have then given them an opportunity to get the nuke to Times Square undetected while the emergency services scrambled to stop the train wired with explosives. In terms of the detonator, the guy was probably the patsy to serve as a suicide bomber-type to ensure the distraction seemed like the real deal and to lay blame once again on the PLR rather than Solomon. Blackburn knew that the trigger wouldn't set off the nuke because nukes require specialised arming devices if I'm not mistaken and you can't use a normal detonator to blow it up. Just my explanation of the events. Feel free to lay waste to my over-active imagination that came up with this somewhat cockamamie fill-in to explain the plotholes in the last mission. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:25, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is the train was already ''going'' to Times Square, and detonating a nuke underground would create a sinkhole a large chunk of lower Manhattan would fall into; if anything it would be even worse than detonating it on the surface. Solomon could have just sat there alone with the thing in his lap on a timer or dead man's switch, the only purpose the hijacking ultimately served was to draw attention to the fact that something was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then again, this story also had my very favourite, the framing device of the protagonist describing the action. I always smile when I imagine how it's going during the actual level. &amp;quot;So then I ducked into cover. Looked up but didn't shoot. Reloaded. Aimed down my sights. Saw a guy ducking out so I fire twice and reloaded and then...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Weren't we supposed to be on a time limit?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seventh Amendment.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Ah, yes, the right to defence in the form of an average-length modern video game.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Correct, the train was going to Times Square but perhaps it was not the last station? I'm not sure how the trains work in New York because I don't personally live there but it's possible that Times Square was a station on a longer line of stations where Solomon could have sent the police, ESU, FBI, Homeland Security and whatever government agencies to follow the train rigged with explosives. Creating a sinkhole does seem like a better idea but I think the purpose of blowing it in Times Square itself above ground was to send a message. The mushroom cloud that would be better seen from above ground would strike more fear, in my opinion but hey, that's just my two cents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In terms of the framing device, I have to agree with the utter ridiculousness of the idea of Blackburn describing the action he performed when recalling every single detail from the playable level but it's far more plausible than Black Ops. Thinking of how Mason could describe every single detail of his action movie experience as well as the experience of the SR-71 Blackbird pilot just made my brain stop completely. Especially when he was extremely doped up and possibly tortured judging by the bloodstains on various parts of his clothing. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:59, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4D0-s8OsI&amp;amp;feature=related Believe me, an underground nuclear detonation is hard to mistake for anything else]. As for Blops, I always had the image of the guys questioning him picking up the bottle of truth serum and checking the expiry date when he started with the G11s and WA2000s. Or the whole THE NUMBERS thing just ending up with him forgetting his wife's birthday. &amp;quot;No! Reznov said it was tommorrow!&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Holy wow. I know that's destructive and it's horrible to say this but that is indeed impressive. My sentiments exactly. However, they probably just went meh because they (as in the interrogators who were CIA) were probably using LSD as a truth serum as well as a mind control drug at the time. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:46, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just got this game (yay! I absolutely love it, even the singleplayer) and I was gonna get screenshots but I heard I need FRAPS. What is FRAPS and how do I get it? - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 21:34, 1 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is a program that can record gameplays and you can also take screenshots with a hotkey if it is running in the background. It has a freeware version. I think in the free version it can only save images in BMP, but u can convert them easily.  Get if from here: www.fraps.com. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 00:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The free version watermarks videos, not sure if it does the same with screenshots. You're best off saving in BMP since the JPEG captures are pretty abysmal quality with lots of artifacting. Give me a few days first, though, I have fifteen hundred images of the singleplayer I need to sort through. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:29, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just need screenshots and I have Photoshop CS4. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then yeah, http://www.fraps.com/ to download the free version. Wikipedia says it doesn't watermark screenshots even on the free version, just be sure you have plenty of HD space since a 1920x1080 BMP weighs 3-6 megabytes. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:05, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::596 GB. :B - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:49, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I currently use FRAPS myself.  It does not watermark screenshots.  Haven't tried getting videos yet.  Anyways, the race is on to see who can put up pictures first.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 14:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will be uploading a lot of great screenshots for the page tomorrow, should I add pics of the iron sights or just ones of interest? (ie, misaligned sights, the M9's correct sights, the MEU's tritium sights, etc.) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:45, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, I'm in favour of having ironsight pictures on all video game pages, since they're so often missaligned, or out of scale, as a lot of what we do here is point out flaws and educate (hopefully) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:06, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, more work. I need more weight to this. :| - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:22, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Iron sights are fine as long as they're reasonably interesting and the article doesn't have too many weapons; this one should be ok. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:30, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My God ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am so glad with battlefield 3 and mainly dice the are actually listening to the community and something even better they are fixing incorrect guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweaked the AN94 so its burst fire better conveys the real world advantage offered by this weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added Single Shot to the AN94 as an available fire mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slightly increased the recoil on the M416 and removed the Burst Fire mode (this weapon incorrectly had burst fire, which was not authentic).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from latest patch --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 19:13, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:19, 2 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh! But HK416 is still called M416? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:13, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait, really? they removed burst from the 416 and added semi to the 94? Wow, cool! Those were the only fire mode errors too :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, aside from not being able to fire the spotting rifle on the SMAW. I still think it would be amusing to be able to shoot people with your 9mm tracer that shoots like a rocket. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:16, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What? Oh, looked it up: &amp;quot;Each round consists of a special 9mm tracer bullet, crimped into a 7.62x51mm NATO casing with a .22 Hornet blank cartridge for propellant&amp;quot;. That is the most WTF round I've ever heard of :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:41, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alex, I don't suppose you could share the link with anyone reading this page? :) -- Long Fallen 14:17, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh right :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder-launched_Multipurpose_Assault_Weapon [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:58, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I found a more detailed look at the round here: http://cartridgecollectors.org/cmo/cmo05oct.htm [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 16:49, 3 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I wonder if they're going to fix the &amp;quot;SVD&amp;quot; as well [[User:Santos|Santos]] 08:01, 4 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that just for PC? 'Cause I'm on the PS3 and the HK416 still has a burst mode and the AN-94 still doesn't have semi-auto as a fire mode. Or is this for the campaign? I haven't played the campaign again in a while. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 04:28, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the new patch that came out for the upcoming DLC, Back to Karkand. The AN-94 got the single-shot fire-mode and the HK416 got the burst-fire mode removed. Confirmed on the PC [[User:Santos|Santos]] 05:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the PS3 here, AN-94 still has the automatic/burst selection as before; no semiautomatic fire. The HK416 also still has semi/burst/fire selection. - Long Fallen 23:18, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing Descriptions in screenshots. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take the screenshot, go ahead and put whatever you want in there.  But if you're going to edit my words, do so only if there is a typo, misspell, incorrect information or bad grammar.  Seriously, if you want to put your own words so badly, put your own damn screenshots up.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 00:58, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your screenshot descriptions read like a filing cabinet. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:40, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
Then like I said previously, put up your own damn screenshots--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 13:20, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a wiki. The point of a wiki is collaborative editing. As stated in the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#IMFDB_is_an_information_resource.2C_not_our_private_playground | Rules, Standards and Principles]], ''&amp;quot;IMFDB is an information resource, not our private playground.&amp;quot;'' --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 13:48, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:And besides, if you take a look at the bottom of the edit window, you'll see it reads: '''If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.''' So... yeah. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 15:12, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're going to get this precious about your screenshots, then don't bother uploading them at all. While IMFDB does have a certain unwritten concept of &amp;quot;uploader's privilege&amp;quot; it does not extend to captions that sound like they were sent in Morse code and don't match the way the other captions already on the page are written and formatted. Also, lose the attitude or you'll be getting some time out. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 15:50, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unless the map or game mode is important to the image, which it usually is not, it should be left out. As for the rest of your captions, I have no problem with what you put, just the map/gamemode doesn't belong here. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:38, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine fine.  I didn't know you were an admin so don't ban me just to prove you can. Sorry if I sounded a little terse, but it is annoying having your words re-written constantly.  But just one last thing, cause I noticed you mass changed my changes back to what you had, would you mind changing &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; to the class?  Such as &amp;quot;The US/Russian Engineer in Multiplayer holds the A-91&amp;quot;? (i'll put that screenshot up in a bit)--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:10, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mainly do that because the character has no name in multi, it's much easier in single where you can do &amp;quot;Blackburn holds an X.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;An engineer holds an X&amp;quot; seems a little awkward in terms of sentence structure; it feels oddly unspecific about the character holding the weapon being the one the player is controlling. I mainly make a deal of saying &amp;quot;the player character holds...&amp;quot; because it annoys me when people say &amp;quot;the player holds...&amp;quot; since the player is either holding a control pad or a mouse. Typically if the player is holding a gun something has gone very badly wrong somewhere along the line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 01:28, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] is admin since October 2011, so keep that in mind. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:07, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know that, congrats! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:17, 6 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I just think that it sounds better than just saying &amp;quot;the player character&amp;quot; because it is just extremely generic.  That's why I usually just put &amp;quot;weapon with extra extra extra attatched&amp;quot; without  putting player character, cause it's obvious there is a player character holding the weapon.  And you don't want people to be holding guns in real life?  Tsk Tsk.  What kinda firearm wiki admin are you?  And relating to that, is there a list of site Admins available?  Is it in the forum?  Cause I know there's at least 5 of you guys floating around here (plus Bunni, but I have never actually seen him post or discuss something in the main wiki) and it'd be nice to know who they are.  --[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 10:08, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Imfdb :. guns in movies :. movie guns :. the internet movie firearms database:Administrators|There you go]]. Overly long page title BTW. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:29, 7 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as you don't edit my post about the PP2000 doing as much damage and throwing pebbles at someones face, that's my gem right there. :p (not like there's anything I can do about if it does get edited) [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:24, 10 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knife used by Dmitri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what kind of knife was used by Dmitri in the mission &amp;quot;Comrades&amp;quot;? Its the one he uses to cut the wires in the garage to unlock the gates.  It looks ... funky and not very utilitarian--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 21:06, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a Spetsnaz machete. [http://www.sovietarmystuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;amp;t=1160] --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 21:25, 5 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A more in-depth look here: http://interestingswords.com/machete/russian-machete-taiga.html [[User:Nohomers48|Nohomers48]] 17:10, 8 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furthering the US Army / USMC mix theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IRL USMC use neither [[M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System|M26 MASS]] nor [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320|M320 GLM]]. Army does. USMC still use [[M203 grenade launcher|M203 GL]] as UGL. As for hand-held grenade launcher... [[Milkor MGL#MGL 140|M32 MGL]]. Spammy for MP but would have worked for SP (like [[Barrett M82#Barrett M107|M107 LRSR]] did). Thoughts shared. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:40, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yeah, and they also don't use the M1A2 Abrams. This seems to be in some nebulous future where the USMC has upgraded all their equipment. Also the M107 was actually pretty stupid since all you did with it was shoot some guys on the other side of a courtyard with a non-magnifying scope. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:44, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Gotta say, upgrading equipment in the future one 'A' more doesn't seem as excessive as with entirely new one... But yeah, it's still upgrade. Like, say, giving the future US Army the USMC [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta M9A1|M9A1]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Heh, that's the wrong mission they put M107 in. Is there any USMC mission where the long range capabilities of M107 would have served better? (Here I'm starting to think of those sniper missions in '''CoD 4''' and '''MoH''') --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:12, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the best mission to have the M107 in would have been &amp;quot;Rock and a Hard Place,&amp;quot; there's a lot of range in that valley. Perhaps even let you pick off officers directing things at the rear so fewer vehicles would show up. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 08:38, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In Operation Swordbreaker I sorta hoped you'd get a chance for some M107 urban action from a sniper point, taking out PLR Insurgents from afar. I'd thought big anti-material plus big city with lots of cover, be a perfect role for an Anti-Material sniper, alas it was used against you rather than use from you. Instead you just got a Mk. 11. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 11:14, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I was sad the M107 wasn't put to better use, it's the only time it appears in the ENTIRE game. The only I thing I didn't like in the SP. :( - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:31, 9 December 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=482809</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=482809"/>
		<updated>2011-11-11T01:51:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* MBT HMG */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== All weapons in BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list below shows all BF3 weapons that are going to be available either SP or MP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is officially announced by EA, but i'm pretty sure there will be more coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: List has been edited to account for new information (eg: Both M16s and only P90TR) and name corrections (eg: DAO-12 to Striker)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assault Rifles (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A3 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*HK416&lt;br /&gt;
*G3A3&lt;br /&gt;
*AN-94&lt;br /&gt;
*KH2002&lt;br /&gt;
*AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
*F2000&lt;br /&gt;
*AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*M4A1 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AKS-74U (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G36C&lt;br /&gt;
*SCAR-H CQC&lt;br /&gt;
*A-91&lt;br /&gt;
*SG553&lt;br /&gt;
*M4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support)&lt;br /&gt;
*M27 IAR (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M249E2&lt;br /&gt;
*M60&lt;br /&gt;
*M240&lt;br /&gt;
*6P41&lt;br /&gt;
*QYJ 88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.11 Mod.0 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*SVD (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M40A5&lt;br /&gt;
*SV98&lt;br /&gt;
*M98B&lt;br /&gt;
*M82A3 (not in MP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*M39 EMR&lt;br /&gt;
*SKS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*P90TR&lt;br /&gt;
*MP7A1&lt;br /&gt;
*UMP45&lt;br /&gt;
*PDR&lt;br /&gt;
*PP2000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*870 MCS&lt;br /&gt;
*M1014&lt;br /&gt;
*USAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
*Saiga 20K&lt;br /&gt;
*Striker&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*M9 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*MP443 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G17&lt;br /&gt;
*M-45&lt;br /&gt;
*MP412&lt;br /&gt;
*T44&lt;br /&gt;
*93R&lt;br /&gt;
*G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Underbarrels (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M320 with HE/Smoke/Buckshot rounds&lt;br /&gt;
*M26 MASS with Buckshot/Flechette/Frag/Slug rounds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocket Launchers (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.153 SMAW (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPG-7 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*FGM-148 Javelin&lt;br /&gt;
*FIM-92 Stinger&lt;br /&gt;
*SA-18 IGLA&lt;br /&gt;
*AT4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
( Source: http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ ) --Zzang1847 23.09.2011 11.07 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is from a Batlefield 3 fansite and not acctualy offical --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 14:38, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This has been discussed before. While it is technically official since the official gaming news sources are also reporting it, but since there aren't any pictures of 'em you have to wait.--[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 15:55, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pages without pictures or info look ugly. The game's out in less than a month, and the Beta's out in a few days, we can wait, but it does mean we get to know what's in the game anyway, even though it's not on the page :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:20, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although there were no pictures, i believe we still can at least put some description and real picture so someone who is actually uploading in-game pictures don't have to worry about putting explanation and finding pictures from the archive, which takes significant amount of time (in terms of AAA games like this).&lt;br /&gt;
::P.S) Sorry about this discussion already mentioned before. I thought i could give some help, but perhaps i'm not :( ~ Zzang1847 23.09.2011 8.43 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Building an article is not a race, there is just less than a week for the Beta to roll in, not that much to wait. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:52, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it is going to just be Americans, Russians, Generic &amp;quot;Not the Taliban, honest&amp;quot; Middle Eastern Militia and possibly the Iranian army as factions then. Damn. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 10:28, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For SP yeah, but for MP it's been confirmed to be just US and RU. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:46, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faction Specific Weaponry details ==&lt;br /&gt;
no need to worry , about faction specific weaponry , reading through some of Alan Kertz earlier posts.He states that the player once leveled up high enough in the class's levels will gain access to the other factions weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun disparity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the feeling the M4A1 will be the counterpart to the AKS74U. This is wrong, but every game seems to do it. The M4 has a 14.5 inch barrel and is a standard issue weapon. The AKS74U has an 8.3 inch barrel and is issued to vehicle crews. A better setup would be Mk 18 Mod O (or HK416 D10RS) vs the AKS74U. Also, the M16 and AK74 aren't exactly equal either. Maybe pair up the regular M4A1 or SCAR-L with 14.5 inch barrel (for variety) with the AK74?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and what do you think the US/EU counterparts to the SKS, RPK and AS Val will be? There's no US counterpart cartridge to the 7.62x39 and 9x39 as far as I know.&lt;br /&gt;
::There's no val, that's vss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SKS = Mk.11 = SVD. RPK = M27. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:52, 9 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its the asval not vss :S.[[User:lukewilliams010]] 12:14 ,19 august 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM\PKP operation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've yet to see a game that properly portraits PKM operation with its 2 level feeding system and non-disintegrating belts. Curious if in BF3 they'll get it right. Doubt it though...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic mounts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optic mounts on all russian weapons are wrong. Basically it's an PSO with optic tube cut off and rail slapped instead of it. Then every Russian scope has its original mount removed so it can be fixed on that picatinny rail. They also didn't bother making [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/1789/i-2863.jpg proper mount] for PKP and just put rail on top of the receiver lid. I was expecting more attention to details in BF3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the Russian army IS starting to use RIS, just look at the AK-9. [http://world.guns.ru/assault/rus/ak-9-e.html] While it does seem a bit sloppy, it can be justified in a way. At least it isn't as bad as that AK-abomination from MW2 and the RPD with rails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know when the beta is starting? cant wait for it! --[[Special:Contributions/109.78.246.33|109.78.246.33]] 21:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or for that matter, how we can get in on it? [[User:That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck|That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get into the Battlefield 3 beta, you need to buy specially-marked versions of the recent Medal Of Honor [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya i got it, do you know when were getting the codes?--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 02:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no clue.[[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you registered your Medal of Honor with your EA-Account, you'll get the invitation and infos, as soon as there is something, so far nothing is known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish I could try the beta [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not just you, after the videos they releases pretty much everybody is dying to get hands on the game. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 12:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta will be open to everyone. Those who got MoH, will get in earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-something-something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check that dude in the BG. also what I think *might* be a holster, but I'm probably wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf6.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's definitely an AK-series rifle, which one I can't be sure of. If I had to guess however, I'd say either an AK-74, AK-74M, or AK-101. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 08:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a dump bag on his hip. At least that's what I think it is. It definitely isn't a holster though, since most drop leg holsters are strapped to your thigh. Why a guy with a belt fed machine gun has a dump bag through is beyond me.--[[User:1SAZ|1SAZ]] 09:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If I had to guess, he may have been issued an M4 or M16 and picked up the MG prior to the pic being taken. You can also see some STANAG mag pouches on the front of his vest too. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I Agree with  Orca1, I know you can't see from the distance, but the profile of the muzzle looks like one of those 3. As the game is set in 2014, im assuming it's either an AK-74M or AK-101. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240G is M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M240G is actually a M240B as seen by gameplay screenshots. You can also identify it's M240B by the heat shield. I guess that inaccuracy in every war game (including new games) will always be. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I knew it was some kind of M240 variant, but since it was being used by a Marine I assumed it was the 240-Golf variant since they typically use that instead of the 240-Bravo. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrong use of the word &amp;quot;anachronistic&amp;quot; there. An anachronism is an object, event, or person portrayed in a chronologically inaccurate time period. The Marines using the M240B is a mistake, no doubt, but it's not an anachronism as the M240B still does technically ''exist'' at the same time beside the Golf model. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:42, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got these pics off BF3 nation;&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf1.jpg appears to be some M16 varient which oddly enough doesnt have any rear sights.&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf5.jpg Another shot of the M16 like weapon (Just going to mention the nice detail on the mag). And hey, new weapon, A COFFEE MUG!!! &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 15:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an M16A4, the developers probably didn't detailed the weapon enough. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 16:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this as well. Im guessing they just forgot, The sights are even not there in the gameplay videos. I do hope they change it though, might seen a little silly firing with neither iron sights or optics. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the new 12 min trailer, roughly at the 7min mark when they put surpessive fire on the sniper, is it me or does the guy on the left, with the M16A4 fire full auto?. [[User:Sike|Sike]] 17:20, 18 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm commenting without checking, but remember how fast you can fire the M16A4 and 93R in BC2? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:23, 19 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racking charging handle when reloading after empty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new trailer showed you shooting an M4 and when you are empty, you reload but instead of pressing the bolt release, you charge the handle. I seriously hope this isn't the default reload [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the begining of the trailer, it did say that it was pre-alpha code.  They'll hopefully have the modeling and other animations fixed by then.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 05:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, cause I'm getting bad flashbacks to games in early 2000 that pulls the charging handle when doing mid mag reloads [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I remember correctly, the M16A2 &amp;amp; M4A1 reloading animations from ''[[Battlefield 2|BF2]]'' had the character use the charging handle instead of the bolt release when reloading, they may have borrowed that. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 05:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3D modeling and animation is kinda hard to &amp;quot;borrow&amp;quot; from older engine/file format. I'd guess it's probably &amp;quot;director thinks this looks more dynamic&amp;quot; like [[Black]], or maybe the animator is under heavy influence of games in early 2000 :/ [[User:Ssate|Ssate]] 02:43, 12 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I hope they change it to using bolt release because it's wield for someone to do that unless you're clearing a malfunction [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 06:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm liking how they now keep track of a round in the chamber and you don't go through the whole reloading animation, maybe this time we'll have proper pistol reloads.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; pistol reload? [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 20:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think he meant that the slide does not lock back when the pistol runs out, like in Medal Of Honor MP. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 20:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in Bad Company and the second one they did the same thing where the slide didn't lock back. If it's one thing Modern Warfare has done right is the reload animation...well except maybe for the ACR. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also a problem with the SPAS-12: the character pump it after the reload even if there was a shell in the chamber. Same in Black Ops. Not to mention that &amp;quot;all pistols were DAO&amp;quot; since the hammers never move. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 08:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About reloads, in last years Metal of Honor, you do a combat reload when your shotgun is empty. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another nice touch that they put in was that they left the front sight on the M4 even though it has an optical sight.  In most games the front sight is either removed completely (like Bad Company 2 or Call of Duty 4) or else it has a flip down front sight (like Modern Warfare 2).  Adds a nice level of realism in my opinion.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I always thought removing the front sight from M4/M16 rifles in games was utterly stupid mall ninja BS, not to mention making the gun look ugly as sin. In a real-world situation, if your optic fails and you don't have any iron sights to fall back on, you're basically SOL while the other guy who's never even heard of a red dot sight is still capable of sending rounds your way. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 10:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't some optics already mount back-up irons (BUS / BUIS) on them? [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:46, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this too. All BF games seem to get reloads completely wrong. You get the feeling the make you rack the charging handle with a mid mag reload to clear the current round so they don't have to take it into account. As awesome as charging the action yourself, or racking the top slide looks, you just never do it during a normal reload. I do hope they change this yeah, but I doubt they will looking back at the other games. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE Battlefield games, but I don't see how its that hard to get weapons right when they hire Ex-military guys to get everything else right. You can even find these things on Google these days. And with COD removing the iron sights on the M16s and M4s they are also removing the gas block. The gun would have to fire one round and then the action be charged manually. I love these games, but some times the ignorance they show towards the things they claim are most important pisses me off a bit.--[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, at least they don't go the extra mile and have guns being fired with the safety on, I can think of a couple of games that do that. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 14:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The use of military and ex-military people are for realistic look of the soldiers, their movements, they communications, and look of ground vehicles and aircraft... But don't forget that it is not that hard to search for photos in the internet of weapons, vehicles, aircraft, uniforms, equipment, etc. and create it in the computer, without using the help of the military guys. As what we see know. BF3 goes for the realistic way, that's right, but it is not realistic in the small details. CoD4:MW, CoD:MW2, CoD:BO, the new MoH, OFP series, ArmA series, and of course the series of BF from BF2 and onwards have so many unrealistic small details that can be fixed easily by using mod tools. The developers doesn't really care if the M4A1 has gas block (CoD) or if you charge the weapon with the charging handle (BF2, BF3), they just want to create a game, realistic or not just the gamers will be happy. It is a bit funny as so many things are so realistic in this game but someone who has good military knowledge will notice right away for the f*** ups. In OFP:RR for example, they only thing that bothers me is that the M16A4 in-game looks like the Canadian C7 rifle. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 18:50, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
don't forget in MW2, fans were commenting that the rear flip up sight on the SCAR was backwards and would back towards the shooter and not forward. IW didn't change it cause they don't care of the little details. Also I like to see a game where they have a random chance to destroy your optic so can you actually can flip up your irons. After the EMP in MW2, they forgot that pretty much all the M4s and SCARS had flip up sights but none of them bothered to flip them up. That'll be the first thing I noticed when I aim or the fact that the ACOG is not electronic and would still work when an EMP hits. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 19:43, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let's not forget MW2 is the same game which showed the Model 1887 being reloaded by having every cartridge put into the barrel. Would certainly make for an interesting first shot... [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 19:58, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In the words of the Demo Man from ''[[Team Fortress 2]]'', &amp;quot;Ka-BOOM!&amp;quot; :P [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 20:18, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New behind-the-scenes footage reveals that there are partial reload animations --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 20:16, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked how ''[[Project Reality]]'' completely replaced the M16/M4 reload animation from ''BF2''; the only time the charging handle is messed with is when you first bring the weapon up, and even then it's more of a brass check than a full pull back. The reloading animation has you swap the mags, hit the bolt release, and check the ejection port. Much more realistic reloading animation. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 07:03, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I wish is adding different animation for reloads. If you are in the middle of an intense fire fight, you reload and press the bolt faster and you randomly fumble with your reload cause it happens. Or if the firefight is over, you do a more slow reload. Also if the gun has flip up sights, I want to see an animation where you actually flip those irons up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:02, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think I'd be happy with the former; same as random jams or giving singleplayer enemies a chance of getting an instakill headshot on the player, it isn't much fun having the game secretly flipping a coin to decide if you get screwed or not. ''Black'' did slower reloads if you weren't being fired at, though; it either sped the whole animation up or skipped the unnecessary wanking around if you were being shot at when you pressed reload. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:50, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing about leaving the front sight post on the M4s is that the red dot sight is raised and not like in COD4 where it is mounted on the rail. Maybe in real life, having 2 eyes would sort of work, but even then you can still have a front post bother your eye looking at it. It wouldn't be a clear shot [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:04, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only game I've seen that gets it all right is Crysis 2, and the weapons are all fictional, though they could all easily exist. It's got both reload animations (six actually, because you do them different in Armour or Stealth mode), +1 in the chamber, attachments on your gun based on where they're mounted (one optic, a suppressor or no suppressor, and an underbarrel), believable damages based on calibres, functioning pistol hammers, and pistol slides that lock back when empty and not as part of the reload animation (meaning you can run around and stuff with a locked empty pistol). [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:02, 16 March 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the left on the bridge an enemy soldier have a Pkm machine gun :&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Battlefield3_Gogogo.jpg (high resolution sorry) [[User:Arrak|Arrak]]&lt;br /&gt;
:PKP&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disable Vehicles == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info at Kotaku and others mentions &amp;quot;Temporarily disabling vehicles&amp;quot;. I'm thinking it may be some sort of EMP thing, though, even for BF that's a stretch. What would be preferable, is if for instance... a tank... had several parts that were damageable. Things like treads, optics, engines, etc could be disabled in order to halt a tank. Same goes with tires and stuff like that with other vehicles. This'd be really cool in my opinion, for instance, snipers could damage the optics of a tank with say a .50 BMG round, temporarily of course. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:23, 3 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 Carry Handle Fix ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If anybody's seen the EA PWNED BF3 episode, it looks like they've added the carry handle to the M16A4. Two short clips demonstrating the ANT animation system that show the M16A4 with it. Good stuff. Also, did anyone notice how they're making prone realistic? It seems they're having the player's elbows be fixed rotateable spots along with the player's spine being able to bend a certain number of degrees. In order to rotate around, the player has to physically crawl over to view that area. It's easy to see in the animation demos that I referred to, but it's also noticeable on the 12 minute trailer when the Marines are on the rooftop, watch the perspective of the player's weapon and how it moves in relation to the arms. Very cool indeed, because I know balancing prone has always been a problem with BF. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 09:15, 30 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiplayer Teaser ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there is a MP teaser up on www.origin.com, looks like they have gone and screwed the m4 up, (removed front site) [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:22, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't get a good enough look at the gas block to tell. Anywho... I spotted the M16A4, a Mk 46/M249, M9 pistol, the PKM Pencheng, SVD, Mk 11/SR-25 (Not a M110, no full URX rail), AKS-74, and the Grach pistol. All but the SVD and Grach are viewable in the trailer, the AKS-74, SVD, and Grach are visible in the corner where it lists the kills. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:36, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-battlefield-3/714884 pause at 0:19 for the M4, [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:42, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The AKS-74U screenshot shows what appears to be an enemy carrying two [[RPG-7]] launchers. Can't tell if they have optics or straight iron sights. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 14:56, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who put the Mk 11 as the 9A-91? Travesty, stoked that the Mk 11 is in though. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:30, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This photo was posted on battlefields facebook page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that while the US gets an M-4A1 with and without optics, the Russians/PLR get an AK-74M.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:54, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might've just been the loadouts they had for E3, doesn't necessarily confirm faction specific weaponry. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:00, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that PSO-1 or the same unidentified sight from Medal of Honor? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They modelled receiver lid locking knob wrongly. Should be like [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/708/i-711.jpg this]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physical Warfare Pack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New weapons, folks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.totalgamingnetwork.com/content.php?4305-Battlefield-3-Limited-Edition-Physical-Warfare-Pack-Available-for-Preorder-in-UK Battlefield 3 Limited Edition: Physical Warfare Pack Available for Preorder in UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time for article update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:08, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I see they're calling it the DAO-12 again. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:14, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Type 88 (and it seems the Bipod is an attachment), &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; lol, with Flechette ammo, aaaaaaaand... a Flash Suppressor for the &amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle&amp;quot;!!!! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:44, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle?&amp;quot; So we're set in California? Watch out, the bad guys have high-capacity 15-round magazines! [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:56, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isn't the SKS 10 rounds though? I never really liked the look of the SKS, but I've seen a lot of people on this site post about wanting it in a game for once, so it'll make all them happy :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:37, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm just talking generally; you know, scary handguns with high-capacity magazines and laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings and gangland bayonet charges. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:45, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Haha, yeah, I'm from Canada, and while we don't actually have as strict laws as, say, California, what we have is lots of paperwork and time spent training for licenses, etc. Making them harder to get and needing more knowledge about them is way better than just banning them. I never understood that, oooo, a bayonet mount, oh no! A pistol grip? They'll kill us so much more efficiently now! Criminals use illegally bought weapons that aren't registered. And that guy that comes home to find his wife is cheating on him? He's so mad he'll kill both of them, and they think he won't just get a knife or something? I'm not supporting killing people, but people would still do it even if all the firearms on Earth went away. We were pretty damn good at it for the thousands of years before we invented them... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:36, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Agreed :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:26, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still no update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:16, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings' - I lol'd --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:11, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why in the hell would they make the SKS a 'Sniper Rifle'? I mean calling the Dragunov a true sniper rifle is pretty much... wrong, I'm okay with it though, but an SKS? &lt;br /&gt;
I'll admit I'm not very experienced with the SKS myself, maybe it's a tack driver in disguise, but from what I've heard it's just a little more accurate than your standard AK47 and that's not saying much.... --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:56, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well there are only going to be semi-auto sniper rifles, so really, there are only DMRs anyway. It's not like it's a sniper class, it's a recon class, so that's not missnamed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:59, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Source? There's no way they'd make all the sniper rifles semi-automatic. We've only seen semi-automatics, yes, but there's no confirmation that they'll -all- be semi-automatic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:09, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I got out of the Recon description here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/08/battlefield-3-at-e3-roundup.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-auto and C4. That could just mean default, and you still get bolt-actions and the mortar later, but I really think they mean they removed both of those, to balance the issues with those two things in BC2. Everyone uses Recon, everyone hides with a one hit kill sniper rifle, and everyone calls in their magic mortars from anywhere onto anything. It looks like they're trying to make the Recon kit more of a DMR kit than a true sniper, which is probably better, it fits the squad play better as a DMR and a support gunner do the same job, one with high amounts of precision, the other with high amounts of ammo. On a different note, I'm pretty sure the M4A1 will be in the engineer kit because it has a flashlight and will be the counterpart to the AKS-74U, like the M16A4 and AK-74M. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:36, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: They meant at the E3 demo, the Recon class has a semi-automatic sniper rifle. At the E3 Demo. Hence the &amp;quot;E3 Roundup&amp;quot; title, it's not dismissing anything, just saying what they saw at E3. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 21:47, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:12, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249 SAW is actually Mk. 46 Mod 0? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By looking at the handgurads, I noticed that they are sticking out like the Mk. 46 Mod 0's handguards instead of the flat M249 SAW's heatshield. Also, because the weapon is fitted with M145 ECLAN scope, this could be the same model as in Medal of Honor, only it is rendered differently or something like that to fit Battlefield 3's engine. So, could be? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:54, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yep, it's for sure the Mk 46. Though, it's all one nacho. Glad with the weapon choices they're going with so far. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 10:34, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Glad to see the M145 MGO, presumably in place of the ACOG. Nice touch. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:13, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yep, there's also some speculation that there'll be multiple types of 4x optics for each weapon, like you could put the Elcan on an M4. But I think it's more likely that each weapon will just have a different model of ACOG-type optic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:27, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's the case, I'm putting the ELCAN on the M16A4, and if there's camo I'm making it green :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Canadian, eh? :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the screenshot is too low to tell if it's an M249 or a Mark 46. The key difference between the two is that the M249 has a magazine well on the side of the receiver for using M16 mags, but the Mark 46 doesn't. You can't really tell if the SAW in this game has a mag well or not. I also want to point out that the SAW in MoH has a magazine well, which would make it an M249. ;) [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:06, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P90 in IGN preview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/117/1172554/battlefield-3-20110606090440594-000.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the magazine looks like its either missing or modeled way to small&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/117/1172554p1.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sorry i dont know how to embed an image [[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:54, 10 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's a clear model error...the magazine is lodged inside the weapon at an angle and the charging handles are floating above the magazine in midair.&lt;br /&gt;
however, the magazine looks like its of appropriate size and its transparent....would be a nice touch if the bullets inside would actually be visible and move.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May perhaps point to an extended magazines type system, though you'd expect the studio to realise that the P90 feeds from the rear so this wouldn't function --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:09, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are Extended Magazines, you can see them in the loadout window in some of the E3 footage on a PKP Pecheneg. But, what the P90 is likely, is just a pre-alpha mess-up. The magazine is there and properly sized, its' just angled downward into the weapon/barrel. It's not married properly to the P90 and is likely just a glitch that will be fixed. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:29, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, pretty cool that things such as extended magazines have made it into BF3 --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:22, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the latest video where the M4A1 had a holo-sight and the gas block was removed. Looks like this will be just another unrealistic game after all. But at least the character pressed the BCRB instead of pulling the charging handle. Damn it, when will a new Rainbow Six game come out?! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:38, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not a big deal. The M4A1 still kills people and looks great. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:47, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I might be a bit annoying to have every game M4 lose its gas block, but it really doesn't matter THAT much, and it makes the scope view clearer. To say that it will be &amp;quot;just another unrealistic game&amp;quot; because of that is silly, just pretend it has one of those super mini gas blocks, you wouldn't even be able to see it anyway. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:57, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The problem is that I don't want to have a clear view because soldiers do not have clear view ALL the time. And there is a nice little thing called &amp;quot;flat-top riser&amp;quot;. One might wonder why was it invented.... - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 17:07, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But they're ugly and no one uses them. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:45, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if removing gas block was optional and made gun bolt-action. Talk about killing with skill :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bolt-action sniper rifles will be usable without scopes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Continuously updated) This video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwT6x7zEQ8c) shows on the kill-feed that the SVD makes a return for Battlefield 3 at 2:20. At 3:48 you see an enemy in the engineer class holding what appears to be an RPG-7 at 3:48. The kill-feed shows at 4:06 a MP-443 pistol. Clear look at an RPG-7 with on the back of an enemy soldier with the rocket (quite dangerously) inserted at 6:03 and again at 7:23. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 16:32, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Team Specific Weapons? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the AKS-74U pictures it looks scarily like that's a US Marine using it on Spetsnaz. As far as I know there'll be unlockables and selectable weapons, but does anyone know if these are team specific or not? I'm personally pretty worried we're going to have a bunch of marines in state of the art gear running around with AK rifles because a bunch of bars say they're the best, or PLR using M4s and 249's, that's as bad, if not worse. --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 17:26, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's only in MP, it's the same as Bad Company 2, I never liked being restricted to team weapons im MP. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The player could've picked the weapon up... We don't know for sure about faction specific loadouts. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 23:54, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally liked the faction specific loadouts in BF2, it was realistic. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:40, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:True, to be honest I'd be happy either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:49, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope they bring back faction specific weapons from Battlefield 2. Medal of Honor made it right at first but then you got the opposing faction's guns and faction-specificness pretty much lost its purpose :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But in BF2 if you killed a enemy you can pick up his &amp;quot;kit&amp;quot; and use his weapons... - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:08, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, first you had to kill an enemy, then you could pick his stuff (kit). But for Battlefield 3 it should be weapon (more realistic than insta-crossdressing xD ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your right, lol. XD - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:25, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually in BC2 your character model never changed when you swaped kits, you could have a medic carrying a sniper rifle, or a ghillie guy with an RPG-7. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah right, I forgot. :\&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lol, you forgot about rocket launcher-wielding snipers ;) Hey, we should put a pic of that under the rocket section or something, you know, just for kicks. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:05, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::lol yeah. The reason I don't remember is because I only played with bots, I only had Dial-up back then. u_u - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:34, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope its not side specific, I always hated that considering how two weapons from the same class where completely different and handled different. Most people would end up using unlocked guns that you can use on either side. If you want a game thats realistic as possible, play Operation Flashpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a fan of Battlefield 2, which featured faction specific weapons, I'm offended someone is saying me to play another game. I might as well say: If you want a game thats unrealistic as possible, play Call of Duty. By the way, in Medal of Honor opposing factions' weapons had identical stats, so that wouldn't be a problem for Battlefield 3 (probably). Also, sign your posts (paragraphs?) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well since OpFor is using a AK-74M and AKS-74U which is some-what comparable to the M16A4 and M4A1, I say the game is gonna be fairly balanced. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: If they use weapon balance from MoH then yes. Because in BF2 M16A2 and M4A1 kinda sucked (better use G36E and SCAR-L unlocks, respectively). However AK-101 and AKS-74U were ''nice'' (damage)! Check their stats here: [http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison BF2 Weapons Comparison] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^^But those games kinda sucked (at least Dragon Rising, Red River looks good). :\ Whatever, I personally like faction specific weapons for my reasons above. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:27, 22 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be honest, Dragon Rising didn't suck, it was just buggy and laggy (which can be said about pretty much every other shooter, at least as start) and didn't have weapon customization (which can be said about Battlefield 2). In my opinion it is Red River which sucked, basically being Co-op CoD:MW with Visible Walls of Block being replaced by Invisible Walls of Doom and auto regeneration being replaced by manual healing. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Meh, that's why I said ''kinda'' sucky, lol I heard AAII is much worst, as its severely buggy and lacks weapon animations and others. P.S. I prefer manual healing over mutant regenerating health any day, the only place 3 second regenerating health belongs is a Wolverine game. :\  - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::To be honest, manual healing in Red River isn't ''that'' much different from auto regeneration: hold &amp;quot;use&amp;quot; key while not getting hit and several seconds later you are good to go. Whether Dragon Rising had an actual Medic class just like Battlefield :) Oh, and it's kinda hard to make complex game without ''a lot'' of technical problems and unfinished things, yes ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if you want actual realism at this point, you go ArmA 2, not Operation Flashpoint: We-screwed-over-an-already-great-franchise-by-making-a-game-with-casual-gamers-in-mind[[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 03:06, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want actual realism at this point, you go to Army. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh, But ArmA II had NO weapon animations, that's kinda a big &amp;quot;unfinished thing&amp;quot; when you publish the game! And you Mr. Masterius, your obnoxious, why don't ''you'' go join the Army. We're talking about wanting realistic combat games not what peoples career decisions should be. -_-  [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:04, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Wolf, one thing you should realise: until Virtual Reality is created and gone into mass production, games will never, NEVER be trully realistic. Holding gun in your hands =\= Mouse+Keyboard. Also, mine is not obnoxious, mine is very nice and tidy :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:36, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::::And what's so wrong with wanting realism in &amp;quot;Mouse+Keyboard&amp;quot; games? Also I have handled, extensively trained, and fired many REAL firearms, so I'm not just some armchair-commando or a mall-ninja. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:18, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eventually FPSs will be the player wearing a mocap suit with a mocap gun, in a mocap room with a floor that moves (like a treadmill) so you can run places. And you will be forced to reload the weapon properly etc. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The first steps are made :D [http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/xio-ultimate-fps-virtual-reality-gaming-exoskeleton-prototype-video-21-04-2011/ XIO Gaming VR Simulator Prototype] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:54, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd settle for having a decent field of view, right now. They're actually getting narrower rather than wider as the gun attempts to colonise roughly a quarter of the screen. Kinda sad when the guy in ''Doom'' held his pistol in a more sensible way than the guy in ''Crysis 2'' does; the latter seems to be holding it with the base of his right palm rested against his nose. Sure, we're not all going to own an IMAX globe theatre any time soon to have a full 180 degrees or so of vision, but it gets silly when your FOV is ~30 degrees these days when most of the old shooters did 70-90. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed your post? Maybe we both tried to edit at the same time, because it wasn't there when I did, sorry about that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:34, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol @ me. Should have known someone was going to say that... Should have added &amp;quot;In a Video game&amp;quot;... [[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 08:00, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Right 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:51, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's alright, danke. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:31, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More Stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe. I didn't see anything listed here that we don't have, but they seem to know what they're talking about. (Near the bottom)&lt;br /&gt;
http://enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:17, 4 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett MRAD/98B spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the &amp;quot;Classes Explained&amp;quot; screenshot...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x80/cowboyw54/Bf3render.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:07, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool, I'd never heard of that rifle before, looks like a good addition. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like they call Picatinny Railed M16A4 '''M16A2''' ''again'' *facepalm*. Oh, and that's a weird sniper rifle. Don't they have '''M110''' for that?&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. And yeah, same goes for '''DAO-12''' (Armsel Striker, duh!). But I would prefer '''Armsel Protecta''' (it's more modern after all ;) ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:01, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually they are calling it '''M-16a2'''... nuff said! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 05:14, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it was called &amp;quot;Blarg Rifle&amp;quot; but had correct reloads, I'd be happy. Where did it say they called it an A2 anyway? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:03, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg here] [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 07:50, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, well, it might say &amp;quot;M-16a2&amp;quot;, but it calls the MRAD a &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; Sniper Rifle, so, we'll see. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I think that the &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; is the Mk II Mod 0 (SR-25), and that they just threw the text on there because the Mk II will be the default Recon rifle. &lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I think this 99% confirms that it will be in the game, should it be added to the main page?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:28, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OH Mk.11, I thought it said Mk.2, and I couldn't figure out what the hell that would be. Yeah, we've seen the SR-25 already in that multiplayer footage, and everything in that video was default. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:05, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So MoH had the M110 when it should have had the Mark 11, but BF3 now has the Mark 11 when it should have the M110 (USMC recently dropped the Mark 11 in favor of the M110)? *Facepalm* [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:27, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed. Another thing about MoH is that apparently Mark 14 Mod 0 got finished in 2003 and got shipped to Navy SEALs in 2004[http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=377] thus making it as chronologically incorrect as M110. Devs usually tend to skip the details. Still, the crown of ignorance goes to CoD brand. The latest MW3 seems to have customized AK-47 *Major Facepalm* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:39, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes about in-game ACOG scopes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there seem to be two separate models of ACOG scopes available in the game, according to the screenshots posted in the article. The M4A1 carbine the player character uses in the 'Faultline' trailer is fitted with a camo-painted TA01NSN ACOG(identifiable by the integral iron sights and lack of a fiber-optic strip along the top) while one of the M16A4's shown in first-person view in the article here is equipped with a TA31F ACOG. This is the second FPS game I've seen to do this, the other being ''[[Project Reality]]'' (itself a mod of ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', coincidentally) which has the TA31F and TA31RCO ACOG models available in it. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:44, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...While in the average FPS, you're lucky if the thing called the ACOG looks like anything in Trijicon's product line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:47, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Making the public in general think every scope is called an ACOG :P Also, in terms of 4x sights, theres the M249s ELCAN, and I'm hoping you can put any optic on anything. One of the DICE guys said there's a crazy amount of optics in BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:26, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even in COD: Black Ops (a game that takes place in the 60s mind you) they have a scope called a ACOG, even though it's obviously ''not'' a ACOG *rolls eyes*. Game Devs are becoming fails more and more every year. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Treyarch basically made their own Modern Warfare, with blackjack and hookers. So yeah, forget about proper portray of Cold War. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:41, 13 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Give me the ability to slap the Elcan onto the M240 and I will be happy. Hope what you said about the 'crazy amount of optics' turns out to be true. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:34, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope you're not confusing the ELCAN scope with the similar M145 MGO. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are correct, I did mean the MGO. I know the M145 is different, I just though the Elcan name was interchangeable. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 13:15, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It would be nice to see a broader array of optics customizations in FPS games. ''Project Reality'' has a pretty good variety, but you have to switch out your entire class loadout in order to change this, and most weapons only have 1 or 2 optics available aside from iron sights (the M4A1 has the widest variety; having available EOTech, M68 Aimpoint, Kimber Mepro, &amp;amp; ITL MARS red dots as well as both TA31F &amp;amp; TA31RCO ACOGs as mentioned above). [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, that Project Reality has been mentioned... I hope DICE won't disappoint the CIS players, so that we can kick yer capitalist arses in proper way... j/k lol :P Anyway, here are the articles for those interested: [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/1P29 for AK-74M] and [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/PKP for PKP]. And the [http://www.npzoptics.com/catalog/sights_for_small_arms/ full catalog]. Oh, and it's been suggested on [http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-3/1405448-optics-lots-optics-2.html#post19418223 EA's Forums], so I don't have to do it myself. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:24, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mocap Guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a challenge for everyone; what are the two wire guns standing in for?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2nd Story&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or if it's off the list after a while:&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab1.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab2.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cornershot and a Thompson with M203? :P [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:lolz. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:51, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More seriously, that thing McNab has is definately supposed to be a carbine with an underbarrel accessory, I can't really see what else it could be. The other guy's weapon is a bit more of a mystery; since it doesn't have any kind of projection for a magazine, I'd guess it's something like a Bizon; can't be a P90, these rigs are for capturing hand positions and his would be completely wrong for that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, actually it does have a magazine, I see a curved MP5-style mag just in front of his finger. So, maybe it's an MP5 with some underbarrel device making the front end all chunky, or one of those MP10 things like in GTAIV. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:40, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOL Tommy with M203 :) The one on the right really looks like an M14 EBR to me, the mag, handguard, and barrel, but the other one is weird. It looks like an MP5 pistol grip and mag, with a really bulky front, and a stock that looks familiar, bu I just can't place. :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:09, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://riflestocks.com/store/product2.html ACE side-folding skeleton stock]? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:48, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that's the one! Hmm, is there anything in particular that's on, aftermarket or otherwise? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Quick google gets me mostly AK-pattern weapons. AK, Saiga, Galil, that kind of thing. Couple on MACs, not that it's likely to be one of those. Maybe that's what a MoCap AKS-74U looks like? :s [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'd say that's the best guess so far [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:13, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno, such a stock shape reminds me of [http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:G36.jpg G36E] which was in Battlefield 2 (with railz instead of optics). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not sure about that, you'd have thought if it was G36E the mocap prop would have a rod or something stuck to the end to represent the rest of the barrel like the one McNab has. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Bah, I am not really into guessing the gun by the mocap. Details of it - OK, but generally it's just a mishmash that can be used for anything provided the grip is adequate xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:51, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually the ACE stock is found on the SPAS 15 as well (which was in Bad Company 1, and Battlefield 2 I think) probably the most likely choice. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:48, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope it's that, that was the ONLY weapon that didn't come back in BC2 for some reason. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But it returned in [[Battlefield Play4Free#Franchi SPAS-15|Battlefield Play4Free]] so its appearance in BF3 is possible ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 23:20, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 unlock spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... in a promotional shot from Dice about their Battlelog service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x599/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:02, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was also seen in the EA Pwned video, along with the G3 (mentioned), I forgot to add that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:06, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I hope this Glock 17 actually holds... well... 17 rounds. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:24, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the MP-443 does, so that could work, I'm thinking there's gonna be a Euro faction, with the Glock as the sidearm, and we've also seen the P90. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:17, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now that reminds me... Battlefield 2: Modern Combat (console version of Battlefield 2) had [[ Battlefield 2: Modern Combat#Glock 17 Pistol|Glock 17]] as Euro Sidearm :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:44, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It did? Awesome! I was just guessing, but that basically confirms it :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:54, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here's some leaked gameplay for you guys, skip to 1:44, there's your Glock. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfeOoEDYEt0) Would appear that the sidearms (at least) are not faction specific. Also looks like it holds 18 rounds but I'm assuming this is a '+1' affair. [[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:00, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Melee Animation is good :D Reloading after every bullet isn't :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha Footage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
no doubt some of you have heard there is a closed alpha trial going on, and some of you may have watched the leaked footage online. i dont want to post links to these videos just incase its not aloud.&lt;br /&gt;
but i can tell you, that the G36c, Glock 17, M27 IAR, SV98, MP7 and M1014 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:24, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Closed Alpha? Any news about Closed Beta for MoH: Limited Edition owners? It should be before Open Beta, shouldn't it? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A pretty nice selection of weapons appearing which is good to see, particularly the M27. Now just need someone to spot the L85 and I'll be happy \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:19, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess it, Russian counterpart to M27 is going to be RPK-74M :O And British - L86? ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You may possibly be right, and I hope you are. If it's in there, first person to deliver the information wins a shiny medal from myself :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::looks like US support starts with the M27, and the Russians start with RPK, british forces arent in the game... --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 13:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The existence of other factions hasn't been denied (to my knowledge) but even so I hope either weapon is available --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 15:02, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Germans aren't in the game and there's a G36C. We can't rule anything out. Plus, there's always the possibility of DLC. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 19:31, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::New factions/weapons added via DLC would be grand. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:50, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Yeah, like they did with Euro Forces Pack for Battlefield 2 :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've yanked the images off the page; as with the MW3 stuff, posting images from leaks is not allowed. Wait until they show up in something official. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why does it even matter? We should post everything about everything we know... :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:36, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Same reason we don't allow pirated or leaked movie footage; using that kind of thing reflects badly on the site. We can wait until these weapons are confirmed in official materials (which they will be in due course, I'm sure), we don't need to go using dubious sources. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:39, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, for a sec it slipped my mind that once the game is out we will have everything :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And there are still screencaps from leaked version :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Which ones? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:30, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The ones added by Gran28 - check page history. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:41, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, I thought where he said &amp;quot;Paris gameplay video&amp;quot; he was talking about a gameplay video released at some show in Paris. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:49, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The ones that I added was from a gameplay trailer released by DICE yesterday I think.--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 08:04, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Ah, if that's so, then my bad. Kinda hard to separate official ones from current leaks. Better mention that on the talk page :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:28, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Official MP Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emwEknzmyRo &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
can see a M4 with a Eotech and a Acog, and the front site is in when optics are attached.--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:32, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible return of the NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MgQMoPwGwM&amp;amp;feature=related and around 1:13-14, I thought I saw the pattern found on the straight mags that the 7.62mm NATO variant of the NDM-86 uses.&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Okay at 1:15 at the maximum quality, I could clearly see that magazine is straight.  This is no SVD guys, no SVD. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 18:09, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good spot, wouldn't have noticed that myself. I wonder why they opted for the NDM-86 instead of the SVD? I assume the SVD is harder to get in Sweden meaning the studio had to find an alternative. Is it still labeled as an SVD within the game? --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is, and it was in MoH. You know, I think MoH was like a super pre-Alpha version of this game, there's and MP7 too, and a few others. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:03, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope DICE do a better job on BF3 than they did on MoH, that game was shocking. There's probably some truth in that though :P --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 20:43, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well, MoH multi was made by a small team from DICE in 6-7 months, and ALL of DICE has been working on BF3 for, like, 5 years, I'm not worried ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Fair play to them but you'd have thought issues with the game would have been patched following the game's release. Still, I don't deny that BF3 will be a far better game however I'm sure some of the issues from MoH will poke through. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, we can hope the issues that poke through don't include those godawful skyboxes that MoH had. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:26, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE deliberately sabotaged MoH MP 'cause they were focused on BC2... :( But it is said that MoH 2 is being developed solely by DC. And it is rumored that MoH 2 will have Frostbite 2 Engine :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:50, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would be interesting to see what DC do with the Frostbite 2 engine, I wasn't all that impressed with the single player but taking into account that (as far as I'm aware) MoH was the studio's first game, it was an adequate effort. Was better than the multiplayer at least, in my opinion. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 07:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've always said that if MoH's MP was the same as it SP, then the MP would be awesome, I have it just for the SP :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:35, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just played some more of SP and I have to say I agree, pretty intense stuff. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:38, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just noticed that all of the US weapons are Armalites, and all of the Russian weapons are Kalashnikovs, it's cool. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aside from the 'SVD' which isn't a Kalashnikov design, but we'll forgive you as it is outwardly similar. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but you got the point ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/sniper/sn18/svd_clones.jpg SVD Clones]. The third one is AK modified to SVD. Ain't Russian guns :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do like the fact that each faction has it's own starting weaponry, I always liked that about BF2 (though I didn't play it much) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:25, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can't find the video, but I'll post a link: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7447261.page [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:31, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 22:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sniper Rifles can have iron sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yup. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:04, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmmm. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:56, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to tell because of the screwed up animation in the alpha, but you load a round into the chamber first, then the tube. EDIT: This is a good thing, I made sound like it wasn't :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It fires semi, burst, AND auto, one of those fancy 360 degree fire selects or something :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Alpha Gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the gameplay, I noticed that the front sights are still present when optics are attached, that M16A4 is now burst-fire and that the US LMG is called M249 in-game. Bipod gameplay was shown too. I also spotted the M-416 at 0:55, maybe the M4A1 equivalent of the enemy forces? [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:45, 24 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, yeah, they made it so the front sight is there, but disappears when aiming, the M16 has burst as well as auto (and semi), and the HK416 is an unlock, ONLY the default weapons are faction based, anyone can use unlocks, but the default ones might be usable by anyone later or something though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's still much better than the MW games. Boy, you complain more about games than I do. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:19, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Defaults faction / unlocks not is how BFs 2 and 2142 worked, too. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:08, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not complaining, I actually like the front sight disappearing system, if it's not there the gun wouldn't work, but if it was, then having an RDS would give you a better field of view. The M16's fire modes aren't too bad, as long as the weapons have the right ammo count, reload properly, and have +1 I'm happy. Things like the player loading it fancy or whatever are okay. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M320 Standalone confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
This. Search &amp;quot;BF3 Grenade Launcher&amp;quot;, and the vid has a G3 with an ACOG too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG 550 pretty much confirmed by Demize ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/30377608852017152 [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swiss weapon of choice 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Few Weapon Vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoU7uBNvP0&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LILgS-M2xo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's most everything in action, and with a few attachments. I love how the description for the M145 mentions the Canadian Army! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking good so far, spotted some people on my Steam friends list playing the alpha. So jealous. :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:43, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm looking very forward to this game. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Video Confirms new weapons for the game, as available in alpha build. In the first video we see an MP-7 PDW at 1:14, M1911 pistol at 1:57, RPK light machinegun on killfeed at 3:21, M27 IAR in killfeed at 6:12, M1014 shotgun at 7:34, G3 battlerifle on killfeed at 8:29, G36c assault rifle at 12:15, M320 grenade launcher on killfeed at 13:16. In the 2nd video we see RPK selection and model at 6:07 (usage following). Someone please update main page accordingly.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 15:32, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good of you to find everything, but leaked stuff isn't going on the main page :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:25, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: awww =(, thanks though.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 17:39, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sigh, The M145 uses the M4 reticle over the M249/240 reticle :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:47, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's the reticle my (standard version) ELCAN replica has on my airsoft C7A2, do you mean the M145 version is supposed to have a different one? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:40, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[http://www.dsarms.com/images/ELCM145M4W.gif Elcan M145 Optical Sight for M4 and M249/M240]. Remember people, this is just leaked Alpha and DICE will ''probably'' make changes to the game to make it right... Oh, and RPK :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh I see. And what do you mean, oh and the RPK? What's wrong with it? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:07, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Has the wrong bipod at the moment, doesn't look like the barrel is long enough to be an RPK either --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:31, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Well... since it has both synthetic furniture and curved magazine, it is [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg15/rpkm.jpg RPKM] (ignore the magazine color). However in-game description mentions that it uses 5.45x39 ammo, which is used in [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg16/rpk74_02.jpg RPK-74M] that is actually used by Russian Forces. So the point is, DICE should change the magazine model and rename the weapon to '''RPK-74M''' for Russians. That Militia can use whatever they want. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I didn't know that, so the curvature of the magazine in an AK/RPK-style weapon can be used to identify the caliber? DICE have clearly given alpha invites to the wrong people, should have gone to the inhabitants of IMFDB. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: :D And yeah. The curve gradation for Kalashnikovs' magazines goes as follows: 5.56 &amp;lt; 5.45 &amp;lt; 7.62, with 7.62 curve being particularly distinguishable ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::You learn something new everyday, now I can complain that the BF3 RPK is incorrect &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:33, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I sent Demize a tweet (I made a Twitter accout JUST to send him stuff) that the RPK should be either the RPKM or RPK-74M (as I can't see the mags well enough), and also sent him another one saying the G3 should be the G3A3 :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::That is dedication to informing the developer their game is wrong, well played. I also sent him a tweet concerning the M145's reticle. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:30, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Very good :D Two problems I've noticed about '''SVD''': First, as already been noticed, is that in-game model of magazine is straight NATO one instead of curved Russian one; second, is that in-game '''PKS-07''' is using optical PSO-1 based reticle instead of its own magnified reflex reticle like this one: [http://www.newphillysports.com/milsurp/pks07reticle.jpg]. And here information about it: [http://www.gunscollecting.com/english/scopes/pks-07-collimating-sight/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:24, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Just recieved an invite to the alpha, I am so stoked to try this game out \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:44, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:56, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 1911 spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just watched a video and the 1911 is back. This game's version appears to be the MEU model. I can tell from the slide, sights, and hammer. It appears to be the old model with the Springfield Armory slide. [[User:ShootingLiberal|ShootingLiberal]] 23:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't see the grips, but it appears to be a stock M1911 with a commander-style hammer (the round one, not the MEU one), a silver 3-hole trigger, and a silver barrel. Oh, after Googleing I found that that IS the original version of the MEU :/ http://www.justpistols.co.uk/meu_001.jpg That's an airsoft gun, but it's EXACTLY the one from BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:35, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, the MEU Pistol is currently designated [http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/24/m45-close-quarters-combat-pistol/ M45] Pistol ;) So maybe in-game it is some kind of customized M1911 Pistol? :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just got the invite for the Operation Metro Alpha and Will post info here if I can.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 20:53, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Awesome, that's two of us now :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So my impressions of the alpha so far are largely positive, not the biggest fan of the map however. Too many narrow corridors that you have to enter to advance, meaning that the defending team can plonk a SAW there and wipe you out as you enter the meat grinder. The weapons feel nice: Plenty of recoil meaning that burst firing is essential. Definitely an improvement gameplay-wise compared to BC2, which wasn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination. Looking forward to the beta now! \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Improvement compared to BC2, is obviously. The question is, improvement compared to BF2! :O--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can't really comment on whether it's better than BF2 as I haven't really spent much time on it (5 mins max) but it is a fairly solid FPS in it's own right. One thing that has bothered me thus far is 3D spotting, do not like it at all though, it should be changed for minimap spotting. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ah, in that case, if you still have BF2, I would recommend you download and install [http://www.realitymod.com/ Project Reality] mod, which focuses on realistic armed forces. There are people who have BF2 solely for it. And, it has British Army! :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yeah and the Canadian Army :D I'll be getting BF2/RM soon. Keep in mind this is one of the smallest map and it's meant to be more infantry focused, they'll be much bigger ones with more vehicles ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:10, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yup :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 29 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I hope that with more vehicles comes more teammates actually willing to take them out. No one playing engineer was even trying, just using their launchers on each other. Meant to ask if anyone still played BF2 as I was gonna get it in anticipation for 3, should organise some gamz. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:57, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I'm trying to get BF2 again, loved that game, can't wait to convert it to PR. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:04, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Needs a bit of polish but what I played of the alpha was a lot of fun, roll on October --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:32, 1 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Anyone have any questions about it? I'd be happy to answer them (as best I can) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:27, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Alpha weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/new-battlelog-screenshots-show-weapons-awards/battlelog-weapon-list/    - [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope, they will make new icons for AR-15 guns. These no-sights ones are just weird. Also, what I've said in &amp;quot;A Few Weapon Vids&amp;quot; --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:21, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The in-game ones have carry handles but I'm sure you knew this, I can live with a few slightly inaccurate icons on the Battlelog though. The M27 IAR had no front sight post for some reason in-game, made the Eotech pretty much essential. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:19, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doesn't it have flip-up sights? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:43, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It does, yes, but the front sight is missing the front sight post. As in, the sights are there, but the post is not. Made aiming quite tricky as you can imagine. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:34, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I'm assuming that's been fixed by now [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:15, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I hope so, was a nightmare. Still, barely used the RPK/IAR once the SAW was unlocked --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:44, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Cause the SAW's a real support weapon ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::^ This, though the fact that you can change the RPK and IAR to semi-auto was a nice feature --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:30, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Does IAR have better accuracy and SAW better firepower or SAW has ''both''? Because if it is the second one, IAR seems kinda... useless. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:35, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::For sure, the IAR/RPK are definitely more accurate than the SAW, the SAW is quite difficult to use at range without deploying the bipod whereas the other two don't have as much recoil. I assume the lighter support weapons are there for the more mobile, front-line support guy. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure this legit as another article is saying they're from OXM so should they be moved to the page and not discussion ? [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== why aren't confirmed weapons named? ==&lt;br /&gt;
such as the g3 ,m416 ,m27 iar and many more????&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can't put leaked stuff on the page, you'd know this if you read the rest of the discussion --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:21, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah thats why all the weapons used in the alpha were named in an official blog and yet there still not up here , so dont tell me i need to read the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do forgive me. Link to this blog? If it's legit you're free to edit the page if you wish. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:12, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I second the link request. Also, sign you posts. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:38, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(TOSSED)  RE-posting.  You guys should simply look up a bit next time. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that's not official blog. It's fanblog that also [http://bf3blog.com/battlefield-3-weapons/ makes assumptions] and [http://bf3blog.com/2011/07/battlefield-3-50-leaked-alpha-screenshots/ postes leaked stuff]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:55, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like I'm tossing that out the window. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:20, 4 August 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::An image which was leaked from the alpha, users of which were under a non-disclosure agreement which means we could get in trouble if we post it up here. Until we get an absolutely official list of weapons (most likely from future trailers and the public beta) the page will stay the same. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:27, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Setups ==&lt;br /&gt;
So what kinda weapons and setups do you guys think you're gonna use?&lt;br /&gt;
*Medic - G3 (or other BR) with a scope&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer - M1014 (or other shotty)&lt;br /&gt;
*Support - M249 (or other belt fed) with a bipod&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon - MP7 (or other SMG/PDW) with a suppressor&lt;br /&gt;
*Sidearm - M1911&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll probably play support mainly, it's what I spent 80% of the alpha doing and it's where I had the most fun. M240 with bipod, optic and flash suppressor will be my class of choice. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:29, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game''&lt;br /&gt;
:^ This --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:40, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PWNED #7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXaFw7aC9GE&lt;br /&gt;
A couple things I missed the first time I saw it, there's the M4, M1911, and G17, but also a Desert Eagle and MP5SD2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:17, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Desert Eagle? [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigNo NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What's up with the Desert Eagle? It's a perfectly good combat pistol *trollface*. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:11, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:22, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Developers really need to stop putting large caliber handguns and revolvers in supposedly 'realistic' games, it just feels stupid. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:38, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-oinyjsk0 I know what you're thinking. &amp;quot;Did he fire six shots or only five?&amp;quot; Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: &amp;quot;Do I feel lucky?&amp;quot; Well, do ya, punk?]'' --''Harold Francis &amp;quot;Dirty Harry&amp;quot; Callahan''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/revolver/1287756474.jpg .357 Magnum Colt Whitetailer], camper's wet dream :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:45, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their rack of guns at 3:06 (presumably airsoft for modelling purposes) contains an M14 and a FAMAS, might be 2 more to expect in the full game. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:00, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::M1911 + M14 = Old School Pack 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, I only thought to rewatch the range part, totally missed the FAMAS and M14 lol, good catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:15, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pre-order Spectact kits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/2/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila][http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/1/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some images of the exclusive Spectact kits you get via pre-order, you'll also notice that the Russian assault class soldier is holding an AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Guess American Assault class gets XM8. Both weapons lost their respective trials. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:20, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise its just art , and probably wont be ingame --[[User:LukeWilliams010|LukeWilliams010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, will wait for confirmation regarding these weapons. Maybe it's just false alarm (and Desert Eagle too). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nah, the AEK will most likely be in, and the AK-74M will go to the PLR faction. There's nothing official, but there's the AEK (RU) and 74M(PLR), SKS as a sniper (PLR), T-72 tanks (PLR), and MP lines recorded in English, Russian and Farsi, that's confermation enough. I've seen no evidence of the XM8, but who knows, they did say there's 10 times the unlocks as BC2... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:30, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Russian Forces clearly used AK-74M on Operation Metro map. The same is expected from final release. As for PLR, there are only silhouettes, and as such it's unclear which AK is used. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The AEK will probably be a universal unlock for all factions if it is indeed in the final game (which I believe it will be, doubt they'd use a weapon in artwork and not include it in-game) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:01, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There most likely will be no AEK in final game. Those renders showing specact skins are pretty dated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fair enough, I didn't know that. Not too fussed either way, not a big fan of the weapon. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 16:09, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please no XM8, at least not in the SP. If it's an MP only gun, I could care less whether it's in or not, though. I'm buying this for the SP, which I'm hoping will be at least semi-realistic. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:18, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I kinda doubt they will put in the XM8, I'd rather see a full-size G36. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:25, 15 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M16A3==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize99 tweeted that the M16A4 has been renamed to A3. Though we don't know if it still has all three modes, I'm thinking it doesn't. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:49, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm. Full Auto M16A4 seems more plausible to me than Picatinny Railed M16A3. Maybe call it M16A5? xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:57, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, the A3 is actually an A4 with full auto, I thought it was an A2-style for a long time, but looks it up, its hard to find good descriptions, but the A3 and A4 are the same except burst/auto. No one on this site gets that because this site calls every A3-style an A4 with an A2 lower. Why? Because that's what armourers built them with, since they don't have A3s. In games the weapon is whatever it's meant to be because it's not &amp;quot;built&amp;quot; on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:09, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, now that's funny. Turns out to be true[http://www.armyproperty.com/Equipment-Info/M16A3-A4.htm][http://world.guns.ru/assault/usa/m16-m16a1-m16a2-m16a3-e.html]. Silly 'mericans couldn't get hold of manual burst firing, Military Command had to enforce it for them :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:21, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hey, those are the two sites I found! I just couldn't find them again :P Anyway, look at the description on the first site, it's worded very old, saying things like identical to A2, but also same as A4. That's actually the most info I've seen on an A3 in one place, adding to the confusion, since there isn't good info around. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:16, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, Alex is wrong and so are the two websites Masterius linked to. The M16A3 is a full auto A2 (only used by SEALs and Seabees in very limited numbers), NOT a full auto A4. IMFDB policy is to identify a weapon visually, not by what the game calls it. In terms of A3 vs A4, the M16 in this game is intended to be an A4, so that's what it should be called. At least for the moment anyway. If it turns out the devs decide to axe the burst mode, we can classify it a C7A1, but until we know more, it should stay listed as an A4. I'm changing it back. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:11, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Uhm, Modern Firearms is respectable source. If you are claiming that it is not that means you have a better one? And the weapon can't be C7A1 since C7A1 is [http://world.guns.ru/assault/can/diemaco-c7a1-c7a2-c-e.html Model C7FT] (Railed Model 715 itself) and Full Auto M16A4 is [http://www.colt.com/mil/M16_2.asp Model 901] (Full Auto Railed Model 705 itself). And there are differences between 705 and 715[http://www.biggerhammer.net/ar15/variants/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now I want to know whether Demize99 tweeted about RPK and SVD... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The first A3s had A2 uppers, but were later (and still are) issued with railed uppers, that's where people get confused. A3 = Rail. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I do have a better source. It's called Defense Industry Daily [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m-16-rifle-purchases-04517/]. Additionally, if you take a look at the M16A2 section of the [[M16 rifle series]] page, it says the exact same thing. I also never said MF ''wasn't'' a respectable source, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's wrong in this case. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:25, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Other MIL-STD-1913 rails can be found on the front grips '''et. al.''' of the '''A3s''' and A4s, where they mount useful items like flashlights, laser pointers, grip pods, et. al.''&lt;br /&gt;
:There too. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:59, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Besides, why does it feature ''Wikipedia'' in '''Additional Readings'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Front grip&amp;quot; as in around the barrel, like a Knight's Armament M5 RAS. It has Wikipedia as an additional read because DID's article doesn't feature the M16 rifle's entire life story; Wikipedia does. In fact, why don't you take a look at Wikipedia where it states that the A3 is a full auto A2 and uses DID's article to verify it? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:07, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are a number of different rifles designated as the M16A3 by the US military. The first is what Wikipedia refers to, the Colt Model 646 which is also known as the M16A2E3, which was introduced in small numbers at the same time as the M16A2 and is an A2 with an A1 lower and was only used by the Navy and Coast Guard. Then you have the flat-top Colt Model 901 which was introduced at the same time as the M16A4 (in 1994 I think) which is basically an M16A4 with full auto rather than burst. The following is what the US army website says about the A3 and A4: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;The M-16A3 is identical to the M-16A2 but has a removable carrying handle that is mounted on a Picatinny Rail (for better mounting of optics) and is without burst control. The M-16A4 is identical to the M-16A2 except for the removable carrying handle and Picatinny Rail.&amp;quot; I would imagine that for modularity purposes the A3 in this game is the current version (Model 901).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:22, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, thanks, that really clears it up, so we could call the full auto A2 the M16A2E3, and the full auto A4 the M16A3, that makes sure they have different names, right? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Interesting, found [http://compass.seacadets.org/pdf/nrtc/cb1/14234_ch3.pdf information about M16A1 and M16A2E3] on [http://www.seacadets.org/ U.S. Naval Sea Cadet Corps website]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:31, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::That PDF is actually wrong, as it states that the M16A2E3 is burst fire rather than full auto. Here is the [http://www.scribd.com/doc/29272650/MIL-R-71135-Rifle-5-56MM-M16A2E3-1992 US Army Military Specification] for the M16A2E3 from 1992 (go to page 4, and look at the fire selector section). Although calling the earlier rifle the M16A2E3 takes away the confusion, it can still correctly be called the M16A3 as it was reclassified as this, kind of like how the M16A2 was originally the M16A1E1. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 06:11, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::True, I guess someone just got lazy and didn't give the flat top version a new name, so the 646 and 901 are BOTH A3s. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:47, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Editors probably made a mistake in ''that'' part because everywhere ''else'' it says automatic fire (right from the beginning). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:19, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, and after more searching: [http://www.military-today.com/firearms/m16.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:21, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I said, the very first A3s had A2 uppers, and after that they had rails. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:17, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Put it this way, the only times it says something about not having a top rail, it doesn't. What I mean is, it always says something really vague like &amp;quot;full auto version of the A2&amp;quot;, never mentioning specifics. I have not yet read somewhere that says that the A3 has a fixed carry handle, but have seen plenty that say the opposite. The problem was someone decided a long time ago that this site was for guns that are in movies only, not a gun wiki, so since the A3 is not in any civvie hands, and therefore not in any movies, it shouldn't be mentioned. All &amp;quot;A3&amp;quot;s in movies are A4s with A2 lowers, that is what the armourer used. However with the addition of newer weapons, and therefore newer entries, and the addition of games, where the guns don't really exist and therefore ARE anything, things are being added that never were before. Correct me if I'm wrong but the Mk.18 is only a military weapon, right? That means that, say, in the first Transformers movie Josh Duhamel's Mk.18 wouldn't have been a real Mk.18, but some Civvie M4 with a short barrel and such, made to look exactly the same as one. But that doesn't make it a Mk.18, however it IS listed as such. I may be wrong and it might actually be a Mk.18, but then Canadian C7-series is a better example: NO civvies have them. Period. But it still has an entry, as it is in Reality Mod, among a few others. Now we see the problem with not having an M16A3 entry: there might not be any in civvie hands, but there are some in games, like BF3, but COD4 singleplayer comes to mind as well, and I'm sure there are others. Hmm, I guess what this comes down to is we need an M16A3 listing on the M16 page. All of them should be listed, even if the only info is the name, a sentence about the weapon, and mention that it has never been in anything, otherwise we get stuff like everyone on the site getting false info about a particular weapon, and this happens. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That ''is'' specific. &amp;quot;Full auto version of the A2&amp;quot; means it's externally identical to the A2, but has fully automatic. I don't see how that's vague. If you've got a credible source saying A3s are &amp;quot;now issued&amp;quot; with flat top uppers, I'd like to see it. But if you look at the pattern of M16 rifle development, it's very likely that such a modification would bear a designation other than A3 (the only two exceptions to this in the platform's history were the Air Force's 11.5&amp;quot; barreled XM177s and when the Army dropped the Model 777 M4 for the Model 920 M4. Josh Duhamal used an M933 in Transformers, not a Mark 18. Mark 18-type carbines with 10.3&amp;quot; or 10.5&amp;quot; barrels can be had by anyone with proper licensing. But the reason we have Mark 18 mock-ups in movies listed as Mark 18s is because, like I already pointed out, it's IMFDB policy to identify the weapon on a visual basis. If it ''looks'' like a Mark 18, we ''call it'' a Mark 18 unless some other way of concretely identifying the weapon (such as an armorer ID) comes along. Your argument about civilian acquisition is a dead end since armorers like MPM are civilians, yet have fully automatic M4s, AK-47s, M60s, and so on in their possession. The only games I've played with full auto M16A4s are CoD4 and MoH, the pages for both of which identify the rifle as an M16''A4''. If you want an A3 category added, either take a look at the [[Talk:M16_rifle_series#Do_well_really_need_to_have_an_.22A2.22_and_.22A3.22_category.3F|M16 rifle talk page to see why it was deleted]] (where MPM himself states that the M16A3 has the same upper receiver as the A2) or come to the forum and state your case as to why said category should be reinstated. But as per IMFDB policy, the M16 on this page should be classified as an A4. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:14, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As soon as my problems with registration are solved, I'll bring this discussion to the light. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Bah. Is there any other way to contact forum administration other than through the forum? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Leave a message on [[User:MT2008|MT2008's]] talk page about it. He's an administrator on the forum. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:01, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Both M16s ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirms multiple M16s! I'm expecting the A3 and A4 obviously [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:05, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, that's pretty cool. =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:32, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's something I would like to take a look at in Beta :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He also confirmed not everything's in the Beta, but hopefully these two will be. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:22, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see very little point in including 2 M16 models, just takes up space that could be filled with something new :\ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The automatic one will probably be the starting weapon to balance it against another starting weapon, and burst fire one will probably be for everyone to use as an unlock. You see, so that to please everyone :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I gueessssss, suppose they don't have to remodel it or anything either, just change the weapon's code/animations. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:58, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think the A4 should be the starter and the A3 should be the unlock, makes much more sense to me. The starter ARs in COD4 were the M16A4 and AK-47 and that was just fine. Or maybe you can modify a base M16 into other variants. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:09, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I guessed it right: Demize has confirmed that M16A3 will be the default US assault rifle for the Assault kit[http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/102776416898265088] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:00, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gamescom trailers and official gameplay vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
We've got official footage for 2 weapons, one already known (MP-443), and one all-new (SCAR-H CQC with Grippod and Aimpoint optic).  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE .  In the Co-Op live gameplay from the devs, one of them picks up an unknown pump action shotgun with a 4+1 capacity.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:06, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice! Wonder if SCAR-L in? Oh, and they give civilian shotguns to military again! *shakes head* Already noticed that with M1014 before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isnt 2 m16 models , where do you get your info lol there is one the m16a3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== INCOMING ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/images/news3/fact_sheet2.jpg *kaboom*]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EA just released the fact sheet with all the weapons/attachments/specs listed, there's the weapon page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT:[http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=165281 and here's your proof] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:22, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that M39 the Finnish Mosin-Nagant? Or is there another battle rifle that uses the M39 designation?  Also, that list is missing the Groza bullpup AR that one dev caught one of the testers reloading.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:42, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 refers to the M14 variant used by the Marines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M39_Enhanced_Marksman_Rifle (this)]. And the Groza bullpup was actually the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-91 A-91] (not the 9A-91 from BC2... Russian weapon designations are confusing)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:56, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good find, kinda wish I hadn't looked at it though XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:11, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: AHAHAHAHA, &amp;quot;SCAR H CQB&amp;quot; made my day. But at least they wrote ACOG, not ACOG Sight, nor ACOG Scope. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:30, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That is what FN Herstal calls it [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=184&amp;amp;backPID=182&amp;amp;productID=10&amp;amp;pid_product=232&amp;amp;pidList=182&amp;amp;categorySelector=1&amp;amp;detail] though does it really belong in the carbines section? I would have thought it still belonged with the battle rifles. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:38, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::They call it CQC, C for Combat not B for Battle. But calling it CQB is still more correct than calling it simply SCAR-H, like in Modern Warfail 2, because that usually refers to SCAR-H STD, the one w/ the normal length barrel. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:47, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I see, fair enough. As you said though, at least they were slightly closer than some games. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:51, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, this does nothing to allay my fears about it being a generic AMURIKA V EVUL ARABS AND KOMMIES shooter. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:37, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, looks like y'all missed them calling it the M93R, rather than just the 93R like it should be. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:39, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A few things; first, it looks like this list is a little dated, as Demize confirmed both M16s, but even though details might have changed, I bet this is a 100% list. Second, remember this doesn't include stuff like the M320 (as it's a Gadget in terms of game), and mounted weapons. Third, I'm assuming the M39 (M14) will be semi only, as only it and the SKS are in the Battle Rifle section, with the G3 moved to Assault Rifles. Similarly, I'm betting the Glock 18 and Beretta 93R will be auto and burst only, otherwise the Glock 17 and M9 would be pretty useless. Fourth, notice that there is a P90 AND a P90TR. I'm thinking if you attach an RDS to the P90TR, it becomes the standard one, like COD4's MP5SD. Lastly, what's a T44 pistol? I did a quick search and all I got was this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/T44.jpg Oh, also, I'm totally using the M82 with irons, just for kicks :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm thinking the &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; might be the sidearm for Iranian forces, like the KH2002 will be their assault rifle. I don't know what it could be referring to, though; as far as I know, Iran uses P226 copies as their standard sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This looks ''really'' suspicious to me. No G36E (as was expected from BF2 (L85 too)), no SG 550 (as was confirmed by Demize), no multiple M16 (wasn't that said by Demize?), &amp;quot;Battle Rifles&amp;quot; actually being Marksman Rifle (M39) and Semi-Automatic Carbine (SKS), several weapons being ported from BC2 (AEK-971, A-91, PP-2000, Saiga-20K, MP-412) instead of BF2 (Bizon or Vityaz, Saiga-12K) for no reason; Beretta 93R and Glock 18 are actually law enforcement automatic pistols and will overshadow regular pistols... And T44? WW2 prototype gun being put in pistols?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; sheet was putted on [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/ official Battlefield Blog], I would have believed it. As of now I take it with a grain of salt. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:38, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The sheet lists an SG553 in the carbines section. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:14, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be like someone saying: &amp;quot;We want M4 in BC2!&amp;quot; and someone responded: &amp;quot;There is M16 there&amp;quot;. One weapon is assault rifle and other is carbine. They shouldn't cancel each other. Really. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, how exactly do you think the &amp;quot;straight pull bolt&amp;quot; under the weapon accessories could work? Either it will be some bullshit about somehow putting a straight pull bolt on bolt actions to increase ROF which will annoy the hell out of me, or I suppose it could be putting a straight pull bolt on assault/battle rifles to increase accuracy and turn them into sort of sniper rifles. Either way, I don't like it.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:32, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T44 is what they are calling the [[Taurus Model 44]] revolver.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:35, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, so the revolver unlocks are Russian .357 Magnum and Brazilian .44 Magnum... American .357 Magnum like Colt and S&amp;amp;W would have been more reasonable, honestly... But yeah, some wouldn't want revolvers in military shooters at all. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sigh, more revolvers. I'm assuming that the straight pull bolt will be for snipers as opposed to assault/battle rifles, either for bolt actions to increase ROF (even though straight pulls are supposedly more tiring than turn bolts) or for the semi-auto snipers for a bit more accuracy? Teeny tiny list of machine guns, sadface. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weapon Reloads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody seen the GamesCom Coop-Demo? I just noticed how the guy reloads his empty shotgun. First round into the chamber, all the following into the tube. I think they got it right this time. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 10:08, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't see that one, but I saw the M1014 reload in the leaked alpha footage, and it does do that :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:19, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Tactical pistol reloads too :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:30, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 Alpha Gameplay == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of Alpha gameplay videos on Youtube is insane, but in one of them I did see an MP7A1. Looked like the same model used in the Medal of Honor reboot. It was only seen for a moment, so hopefully someone can add more information? [[User:Miyazawa|Miyazawa]] 22:11, 18 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The MP7 is setup the same way as the MoH one, using the stock, grip, and pistol sights, but obviously has a proper empty reload. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tried to add the MP7A1 on the BF3 weapon listing underneath the submachine guns but someone keeps on deleting it. I havent uploaded an image from youtube because honestly I dont know how, can someone help out with this and stop deleting this post as the weapon IS CONFIRMED. [[User:Valant]] 2:58PM, September 9, 2011 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
: No, it's not. You're not allowed to post anything from the Alpha build. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 17:18, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Valant here reposting MP7 gameplay, and to reply YES I CAN post because most weapons you see on page from the alpha/PAX gameshows. In fact for the most part all of the weapons should be deleted because they are from the same build. I have provided a link to show first hand footage. Once the game is released and this is fact checked, the comment I left before  can be deleted. Here is the link again:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvvdBhH0r4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just not getting into your head, isn't it?  Screencaps from non-official/leaked footage are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.  SO yeah, it's nice and all that you're linking that in the discussion, but please DO NOT edit the main page again until beta comes out. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:51, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh REALLY? Because last time I checked there are several screen caps and images that are of some low quality camera taking a picture of a screen DURING ALPHA! Check the muther f*****g G36C section, or The UMP45, the AK74M, the DIO KH2002, and G3A3. These are all weapons from the same build of the game and these have pages, ergo the MP7 should have its own section. Now, im off to put the post BACK UP so suck it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are confusing Closed Alpha with NDA and Game Shows (Expos) intended for public. Those ones are categorised as Pre-alpha‎ (expos before Alpha) and Pre-beta (expos after Alpha). And you are just asking to get reported. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:03, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.....reported.....really....well then if thats the case as I posted on another MP7 related discussion below Ill wait till the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; news about it comes out&lt;br /&gt;
== Full Auto Carbine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Been reading and watching videoa and they all have the M4A1 listed as a carbine. Does anyone know if the M4A1 fires full auto, three round bursts, or a single shot when fired?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M4A1 is a carbine that is full auto or semi, just like real life, is that wierd? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbines ==&lt;br /&gt;
What makes me really happy is they got the term Carbine right; the M4A1 is an M16 Carbine, the AKS-74U is an AK-74 Carbine, the SCAR-H CQC is a SCAR Carbine, the G36C is a G36 Carbine, the SG553 is a SG550 Carbine, and, well, you could call the A-91 an AKM Carbine I guess. That's also why the relatively short HK416 is in the Assault Rifle section and not the Carbine one: it's not a Carbine. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:52, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Trivia Information''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL in addition to Assault Rifle and Carbine category, there is also so called Sub-Carbine category (that is, shorter than Carbine). Four of the above mentioned pairs have three guns in these categories (and three of these four pairs even have additionally Automatic Rifle/Light Machine Gun variant but that's a different story). And here is the list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M4 Commando &amp;lt; M4 &amp;lt; M16&lt;br /&gt;
:AKS-74U &amp;lt; AK-105 &amp;lt; AK-74(M)&lt;br /&gt;
:G36C &amp;lt; G36K(E) &amp;lt; G36(E)&lt;br /&gt;
:SG 553 &amp;lt; SG 551 &amp;lt; SG 550&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And to which category HK416 belongs, [http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/hk416_specs.asp depends on the variant]. Quite a list, isn't it? ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And while AKM didn't have official carbine (there was [http://www.red-alliance.net/forum/index.php?topic=11481.0 a prototype] and that's it), SKS can be considered one somewhat :P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe that was interesting to read :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:45, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Again... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's with the people using this &amp;quot;fact sheet&amp;quot; to clutter the main page with weapon titles. Can't they wait for more substantial material before adding stuff? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:02, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed; pages that are just lists of weapons without pictures or really any info look terrible, let's wait for them to show up. The people who care can find it here on the talk page, or Google :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Leaked info is not allowed, and entries with no pics or info aren't very much liked either. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:29, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^ Precisely. Official artwork, renders, graphical announcements (like that for Physical Warfare Pack, or Battlelog), screenshots, trailers, gameplay videos; screenshots made from official trailers and gameplay videos. All those things will do. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UMP==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can see it in a video from nvidia, the player to the right of the interview, you can see him using a UMP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
unkown what calibre, but im just gonna assume its UMP45 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:38, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==HK416==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
another video from nvidia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUyIIIKta44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if you pause at 0:30 it looks like the HK416--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:42, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M27 IAR, to be specific. Based on the HK416, yes, but not a normal HK416. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:25, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well the Hk146 is in, it appeared on the battlelog stat page. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 09:25, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weird Weapon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is that weapon the guy starts using at 2:24, in this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs ? It looks like an AS VAL, but that optic setup is weird. I wish they sticked to the real life russian optics, instead of creating rail-attaching versions. E.g.: The PK-AS (russian holographic) is actually offset to the left side of the gun, not aligned with the bore or mounted on a rail.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 08:20, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's quite hard to get hands on real Russian weapons in Sweden, so work is done with what's available... Oh, and PK-AS isn't holographic sight, it's reflex sight. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:56, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be the VSS. You can use iron sights on a sniper rifle so they might allow you to use reflex and holographic sights as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's no VSS, there's a VAL, but this guy's an Engineer, so it doesn't matter either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:14, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fact Sheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People, while it has been confirmed that the fact sheet is indeed official, it's also been confirmed that it '''IS NOT A FINAL LIST''', it only shows the equipment available '''SO FAR'''. So don't worry, I'm sure many more equipment options will come (I hope these include an MP5). [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 20:34, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, Demize wouldn't confirm whether the Karkand guns will be able to be used in standard BF3, but the way he said it seemed to hint they might, so I'm betting we'll see the MP5 and PP-19 Bizon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:26, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonzaga that's pretty much false hope , because there not going to release an official fact sheet and then add &amp;quot;many more guns&amp;quot; its not even wishful thinking its just stupid.and Alex when somethings is unconfirmed that doesn't mean its automatically going to be in the game, and if its anything like bfbc2 which it is, the guns will be seperate like the Vietnam expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: First, no need to call me stupid. And second, do you really think they can't add more stuff to the game 3 months away from the release? Not even the beta is out! Plus, by equipment I didn't necessarily mean more weapons. I guess you thought so because my example was a weapon.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:03, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did not call you stupid, I called your idea stupid.You really think that there going too add tonnes more &amp;quot;equipment&amp;quot; after they've released an official statement than that is stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's stupid here is you not signing your posts. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:06, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lol owned :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:47, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS has a plastic stock ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirmed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:36, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 full weapons list ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is up on official [http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ bf3 blog].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not the official blog. As it says in the description, it's a fan site. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:21, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, but it is news of an actual official announcement. --[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 00:00, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The announcement was leaked, meaning that the information it contains has no place on the main page. Until we get official imagery of each weapon, they should not be added to the main page. Just makes everything look a bit messy and half-arsed if you ask me. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:49, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About SVD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So were there any news from Demize or some official material released that confirmed that the magazine for SVD was fixed or not? Should it have been changed to NDM-86 on the main page? Only seen it in leaked Alpha (which ''could'' have been a temporal state, considering that SVU in BC2 had proper magazine (SVD and SVU use the same one), and this one probably ported from MoH for testing purposes). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:35, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battleblog #8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sig 553 and Strela/Igla launcher confirmed in a post on the official Battlefield blog [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/08/25/battleblog-8-build-your-weapon-of-choice.aspx] --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, suppressive fire with carbine :) And the modelled launcher is [[SA-7 Grail|Strela-2]] (NATO reporting name: SA-7 Grail) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thought as much, was the disk-shape thingy at the front that gave it away. &amp;lt;3 the weapon customisation that BF3 will offer though, gonna be awesome. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the primary indicator for Strela-2 is that, errr, under-barrel thingy with tube-and-spike shape while every other model is ball-and-tube. Here is a nice chart: [http://blueprintbox.com/watermark-gif.php?img=./data/media/384/sa-14-strela-gremlin.gif]&lt;br /&gt;
:::And yeah, customisation is great \o/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the bit I meant, forgive my extremely technical description XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:06, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, heh, right. Thought you meant the launcher tube itself :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:47, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incoming weapon modification options seem very exciting....lots of options to tailor your weapon to your specifics. However, the only detail about the blog that keeps me sceptical is the fact that you need to unlock every feature for each weapon individually. Knowing that from MW2 that would mean hours and hours and hours of playing with just one weapon to finally unlock the parts needed to tailor it to your specifics, only to then unlock the next weapon you've been longing for and then you need to start again from scratch with that weapon. Rather frustrating IMO. Would a better idea to make the modification parts a global unlock, so that once you unlock say supressors with an assault rifle, it counts for ALL other assault rifles too...same with LMG's, Pistols, Shotgungs, etc. [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:05, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
Found it; 2nd video, 21 seconds in. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:13, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link please? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 09:25, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OOPS, sorry, here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://ob-game.blogspot.com/2011/08/battlefield-3-three-videos-from-pax.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:57, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ummm you're wrong thats an mp412 , the scope also looks russian which gives it away&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually it doesn't look like the Mp412 at all or the T44, it looks a little different, take a look at this image I snapped of it&lt;br /&gt;
: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/687/mp412orcoltpython.jpg/&lt;br /&gt;
: To me it almost looks like a Colt Python from Black Op's, notice the iron sights, front and rear (the white markings) and the silhouette of the barrel and cylinder as well as the positioning of the grip, it's hard to say but my vote is towards a Colt Python. DICE did say they were going to add Faction specific weapons and if you look a little earlier the guy was using a Stinger. I'd think a Colt Python .357 Magnum would go nicely as a US analogue to the Russian MP412 .357 Magnum. Also to the Scope, it could just be a Russian style scope attached to a US weapon, they did say that the customization was huge so it's a possibility [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:47, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its an mp412 , if it was a python it would have grooves down the barrel housing which it doesn't its solid like the mp412 also I noticed the break action latch near the iron sight, which also corresponds to the mp412 , the python does not have a break open design. *Edit* also the colt python is not in the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The devs didn't say there isn't any other revolver in the game, thus shouldn't you, Persistent Mr. Anonymous. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:17, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, it's NOT a 412, but it could be a Python, some S&amp;amp;W, the Raging Bull, I don't know. The lighting's wierd, but it looks stainless to me, which would be good if the MP412 is black. The SKS, which is synth, has been spotted with an EOTech, so unlocking American optics for Russian guns and vice versa is confirmed. I'm thinking every optic, with the exception of the 6x and 12x sniper scopes, can be used on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:33, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, if you cant indentify that gun, then you shouldn't really be on the site to be honest, because you can clearly tell that's a mp412 the colt python has barrel housing grooves this doesnt it solid like an mp412 , you can also see the break action latch is,colt pythons dont have this because they are not break reloaders. *Edit* and how can you say that it is stainless? its clearly black with a synthetic grip.&lt;br /&gt;
:In that case, by your rationale you should leave right now. Ignoring everything else about the gun, look at the muzzle end. This pistol has a rounded barrel with a raised rib. The Mp412 does not. Also, the locking indents on the cylinder are wrong for a MP412, where they are small cuts coming from the rear of the cylinder, rather than the more traditional ones shown here. The part of the frame that meets the rear of the cylinder is also wrong for a MP412, which would have a &amp;quot;step&amp;quot; rather than a smooth ramp where it widens to the width of the cylinder. Due to the motion blur ghosting on this image it is really hard to tell anything about it so we will just have to wait and see. Also, sign your posts and stop being so condescending.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:22, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, just noticed that in the same clip the person in front of you has a G36C, so that can go ahead and be confirmed, along with the Stinger for that matter.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:47, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021255.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, these are official videos, not DICE ones, but offical meaning by a site/company etc; should they be added to the main page? It's kind of a grey area. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:25, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAX and NVIDIA are definitely can be considered official source just as E3 and IGN. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok lets just leave it as the t44/mp412 for now, if we cant agree on what gun it is, then theres no point arguing senselessly we'll have to wait until the game comes out to properly identify it --[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 14:10, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M4 and M4A1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was just browsing through twitter when i noticed something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/108437158804717568&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
both the M4 and M4A1 is in. like how the the M16A3 and A4 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 10:54, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's amuses me because I had ''exact'' the same thoughts. Seems I wasn't alone xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:10, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems to me more that BF3 will have much more weapons than we thought. Well, let's just pick one up and kick some asses with it :) --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:12, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think its pretty cool they are getting multiple variants for each gun. Heres hoping for an AK-47 unlock.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 12:06, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the same twitter he makes a point of saying that the M4A1 was designed for special forces whereas the standard weapon that would be found being used by Marines is the M4. My spidey sense is telling me that the standard weapons will be the burst M4 and M16A4, and they will be upgradable to full auto M4A1 and M16A3 (flat-top receiver won't tally and the number will make no sense to the layman but whatever).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, he already said the full auto ones are default. But I'd figure in SP we're more likely to see the burst ones. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:31, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::SP: M4 for regular Marines, M4A1 for USSOCOM units, something like that. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:50, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In any case, it's awesome they added variants of many weapons. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 17:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:28, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't remember where I saw it from, probably from Battlefield wiki but I remember seeing that the weapon variants were based on each Classes Kit selection. So for example, take the Assault class, as it's being merged with the Medic Class, Players would have the option to equip either a Grenade Launcher of carry around a Medkit. So for example, an M16A3 could be default setting with a Medkit as a piece of equipment but the M16A4 is used when attaching a grenade launcher. But that's just my theory [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:37, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not really merging, they're just going back to how they had it in BF2142 (Assault = Medic + Assault, Recon = Sniper + Special Forces, Engineer = Anti-tank + Engineer and Support = um, Support, his main &amp;quot;thing&amp;quot; being his extra droppable things like a portable shield and a sentry gun). In 2142 every Assault had a Medkit since you don't want to give your medics the option of being even more useless, the optional item for the Assault class was the defib. The fastest way to get TK'd as Assault was to have someone realise you weren't carrying one. I imagine this one will be the same, Support will always have an ammo box and assault will always have a health box. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PWP Trailer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-ukxgldpOo&amp;amp;feature=feedu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
warning, containts footage from operation metro they some players may find offensive. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:58, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is... ''SKS''? Reminds me of AK-47 in MW2 *sadface*&lt;br /&gt;
:Another thing noted: incorrect reticles for M145 and PKS-07 are still in... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:27, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember though DICE did say that you can &amp;quot;customize&amp;quot; your weapon, that might be a SKS just heavily modified by the player rather than appearing as the &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; weapon. Who know's if we're lucky, the SKS might be featured as standard in it's default config [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As much as I would want it to be, I doubt that what DICE meant by customization. BF3 so far doesn't seem to have customization as elaborate as, for example, [[Ghost Recon: Future Soldier]]. Thus this tacticool SKS is probably the only one *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:44, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; -.-... OMG! What the heck is their deal with the DAO-12? Can't they just call it how it supposed to be called?! --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 10:01, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE seems to have obsession with this &amp;quot;designation&amp;quot; as it tracks way back from Battlefield 2 (2005) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:16, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DAO-12 was used because of a legal conflict with Armsel using the Striker name, it became a fan favorite so they kept the name. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:09, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
i asked Demize on twitter and he replied saying it was a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 14:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly, and we all know how bad most gamers are at identifying weapons, the MW3 crowd widely believed the ACR was a SCAR because the ACR was tan (in MW2 the SCAR was tan and the ACR was this ugly grey colour, and now the ACR is tan). If they renamed it Striker a lot of BF players would think it was a different gun :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:20, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Er, that doesn't really sound like a bad thing :/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:29, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i asked demize about it, and he said they named it the DAO-12 as a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:57, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
I asked demize if there was an m14 battle rifle and he replied ,and said there is a M39 EMR so that can now be added to the weapons list.--[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 16:07, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He also said SG 550 would be in, official blog showed SG 553. And SKS is &amp;quot;SKS&amp;quot;. We need official ''illustrated'' material. As soon as it is available - go ahead, put it in. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:29, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, if we don't have a picture, don't add it, even if it's not leaked. It's not like we won't have everything up pretty soon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1/M16 Gas block question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen quite a few topics concerning the lack of a visible gas block on the M4's and M16's in a number of shooters, and I was wondering if it was possible that the gas blocks could be either low-profile gas blocks that were either not visible or were actually under the RAS, or if the gas blocks were actually integrated into an after-market RAS. It seems odd to me that developers would repeatedly make the same mistake over different games in different franchises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's possible to just remove the front sight without removing the gas block on a standard M16 rifle and M4 but it'd be a little exposed. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:23, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you mean with a hacksaw? Aren't the gas block and front sight a single piece of metal? It is however possible to get a low profile gas block (relatively easy replacement) that only extends above the barrel to the height of the gas tube plus a few mm, so that certain free floating RIS systems can be mounted over the top of it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:39, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That was my question; with all the Military consultants they have coming in and looking at this stuff, I'd always assumed that they had just modeled an after market RIS and low-profile gas-block.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder why developers won't just model Flat Top Mounts\Risers on the sights for M4s\M16s ? That's how the problem is solved IRL, including in U.S. Military. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:16, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd imagine that most modellers don't realise that the front sight is also the gas block, so they see no problem in removing it for aesthetic/gameplay purposes. 99% of gamers probably don't realise either.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:15, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both the modellers and the gamers doesn't supposed to care about this kind of things, only people like us, it can concern. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 09:31, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was well after I got into learning about firearms and such that I found out the front sight (gas block) and stock tube (buffer tube) are required for the AR series to function, so you can't remove either pretty much. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's true that the stock front sight post is also the same piece of metal as the gas block, but you can remove them so long as you put a new gas block on.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I meant you can't just take it off :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Confirmed to be the more modern 5.56mm version by Demize. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:08, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Guillotine Teaser Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else seen it? There's a mortar that the player-character uses to send up flares (I think they called them illumination rounds) and I think the player-character also uses a Mk. 17 with some sort of 4x scope. Sorry, I'm still fairly new to this. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:27, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the mortar is an M224, and yes it was a Mk.17 with an ACOG (magazine looked a bit small in the mag-well, but could be the angle as could only be seen when climbing the wall). Also, it looks like the guy who is stabbed at the end of the video is carrying a G3A3 with an ACOG.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 series reload animation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm fairly new to this site, though I've been following it closely to see the development of the firearms that will appear in Battlefield 3.&lt;br /&gt;
I've been reading that a lot of you guys are expecting an accurate portrait of the M16 series reload animation in the game. I just wanted to ask how do you properly reload an M16 in real life? It is my understanding that when the rifle is empty, you load it by pulling the charging handle. But when there is a bullet still in the chamber you just need to press the bolt catch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I just want to get this clarified since I've never been able to understand the reload mechanic of the M16.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:14, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:With the exception of loading the gun for the first time or clearing a jam, you never need to touch the charging handle. If you are reloading from a partial magazine, there will be a round in the chamber so all you need to do is drop out the magazine and push a new one in. When you you empty the magazine in an M16 type weapon the bolt locks back automatically, so you drop out the magazine, put a new one in, and then all you need to do is push the bolt release on the left side to let the bolt go forwards (you can also push the forward assist if you feel like it).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:20, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the third reason you might is if you just picked it up off the ground, to check it's still mechanically sound. Though that sorta falls under clearing a jam. Edit: Also you might part-pull it on drawing it if you're into brass checks, though given how often FPS characters change weapons habitually brass-checking on draw would probably indicate a very short memory. &amp;quot;Yep, still there from ten seconds ago, how bout that.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:09, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could rack the charging handle if you like, but the proper way to reload and empty M16 type weapon is to just slap the bolt release. I call it the ping pong paddle. A lot of games forgets about little things like reloads for weapons [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 01:02, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who removed the MP7!?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, who took away the MP7 from the submachine gun catergory? I spent a whole 20 minutes adding that section of the article and some guy just deleted it. Why? It was really in the game and not in any way spammy or vestigial.  Whoever took away put it back. Come on, I don't want to remake the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THere are NO official images of it.  And no official video footage has featured it.  Don't post images from the Alpha --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 03:20, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the fact remains that it has been seen in the game, and it was already on the page before I made the changes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why can't I use the Alpha? I don't know if there is or is not a rule regarding alpha version footage and stuff. I thought the purpose of this site was to chronicle what weapons were used in what movies/games/TV/Anime.  If I have evidence that the MP7 is in BF3, why does it matter whether or not it was from the Alpha or official footage?  The image I used was from a gameplay video I saw on Youtube.  Does this mean no one can use their own gameplay videos?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, it means that you have to wait for officially released material or for the game to actually come out. This applies to leaked gameplay footage, images from leaked betas, dubious leaked information in general (eg the MW3 leaks from Kotaku) unapproved on-set photos, leaked movie footage like that infamous cut of ''X-Men Origins: Wolverine'', and so on. Building an article is not a race, if we have to wait to confirm something is official, that's what we do. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:49, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose that makes sense, I'm gonna keep that in mind when making contributions in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought anything to do with the Alpha was under an NDA anyway? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:31, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, if you look at the screencap he posted the guy who leaked it deliberately blacked out his own name. Obviously knew he shouldn't have been recording it and posting it in the first place. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, for the last frickin' time.  Please DO NOT add weapons that are not in any official gameplay vids/trailers/screenshots, until they are.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 14:02, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ HashiriyaR32: Hey! I was also someone who tried adding the section of the MP7. Its in the alpha videos but to be fair, so is every freaking gun that is on this page! The only videos that are available are the ones from the alpha. Seriously take the amount of time it takes to delete the post and go onto youtube and see for yourself! In fact, after posting this I will repost the MP7 with a link to the youtube video...Also FYI I happen to love this website and for all it stands for and I try to monitor several different games to make sure the info is correct, I would never want to add something that didnt exist in a videogame/movie. Valant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What? Nothing on the page is from the alpha, everything's from screenshots, trailers, concept art, or official videos, like EA Pwned, IGN, etc. If you don't believe me, give me an example. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:52, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Valant, its as simple as this. To take part in the Alpha you had to sign a non disclosure agreement. That means that any footage that you have seen was illegally distributed. Until guns show up in an official (and legal) source, they shouldn't be listed here. The MP7 may very well be a weapon in the game, but the point is that at this point that information has not been publicly release, to say nothing of the fact that legal screenshots cannot be posted on here. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:11, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right, and as soon as the Beta is out, we can add everything, it's only a week-ish, and besides, WE all know the MP7 &amp;amp; others are in, and they can be mentioned on the talk page, just the official page can't have it. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:39, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I should just delete this whole page then shouldnt I? Because again every weapon we are seeing IS NOT CONFIRMED! There is no beta released and only Alpha videos....Seriously this is bullshit&lt;br /&gt;
:The difference is that all the other weapons are from material that was released by EA, or from footage that they allowed to be shot (The images from the G36C section are from an interview with one of the developers IIRC) as opposed to the video you posted which was illegal made and distributed by someone breaking the NDA they signed. As you seem unable to grasp this, just wind your neck in for a week or so until the Beta is released, and then it can be posted with LEGALLY obtained confirmation images. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:15, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If posting info from a breach of NDA is the main reason than I can understand that. Then I shall wait for the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; information to be released.&lt;br /&gt;
== G3A3 and UMP.45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The weapons can be seen in these videos from GameSpot in the Tokyo Game Show 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it's cam footage you can clearly see the pick-up icon of the weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should work their magic and add those to the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd0M7_3wENw Part 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbsI9Vsv5wE Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arOhTIaeGGY Part 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 12:59, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can have it down in about 20 minutes. --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would imagine that if it is cam footage it has likely not been officially release and is against copyright, so probably shouldn't have caps on here. You can get a shot of the G3A3 from the end of the guillotine trailer though.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:05, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the two weapons on the page. Since the videos were not leaked but released by a reputable game journalism/review site (Gamespot.com) it should be okay, right?  If they weren't allowed to release it Gamespot wouldn't have done so. I looked around and other gaming websites are posting the footage as well [http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tgs-11-battlefield-3/721062]. I'm pretty new to IMFDB, so is the stuff I saw in the gameplay okay to post? --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Similary to E3 with IGN, PAX with NVIDIA, TGS with GameSpot definitely can be considered official source. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:53, 18 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1911 Confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gunclub.ea.com/us/intel/blog/battlefield3-weapon-unlock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For being an EA gunclub member you get an M1911 :P --Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Gun-Club/images/bf3-gun-unlock.jpg --[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:39, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not too sure exactly what pistol they have based this on though. It has slanted cocking serrations on the slide (rear only), non target sights, beavertail grip safety and a rounded burr hammer. Closest thing I can think of is the early version of the [[1911#M-45_MEUSOC|M-45 MEUSOC]], which are a old USGI 1911 frame with a [[1911#Springfield_Armory_M1911_-_A1|Sprinfield Armoury]] slide, a rounded hammer, a beavertail grip safety and Pachmayr rubber grips (along with some other less obvious improvements).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I'm pretty sure it IS the original version of the MEU. Also, you missed the Springfield 3-hole trigger. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:24, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gun Club? Looks like EA is messing up again: http://gunclub.ea.com/us/mygunclub/rewards&lt;br /&gt;
:They haven't even fixed the stat tracking :S --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:12, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 Open Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, EA confirmed the PC/X360/PS3 BETA startup. Begining 27.09 for those who have MoH 2010 Tier One Edition, and 29.09 for the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
Good opportunity to test the game and get some guns updated :). ~ GumBoy 21.09.2011 16.07 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, the early access is open for people with the Medal of Honor Limited Edition as well, not just Tier One. It's also for people who pre-ordered before a certain cutoff, but I can't remember the specifics. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 09:10, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can't wait for this, hope we get a different map this time, Operation Metro was good but not great. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:37, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Caspian Border would be great :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:06, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP2000 Spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog pics here: http://www.battlefieldlog.com/2011/09/battlefield-3-beta-battlelog.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pdUIBRNHpXo/Tn4uZQaayQI/AAAAAAAAAdw/PVmts2hVNjU/s1600/battlelog-4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's the pistol, what's the shotgun? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:09, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the handgun is a Glock variant, whilst the shotgun is Benelli M3 Super 90. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 08:02, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I saw the PP2000 in action at Eurogamer Expo, looked pretty good. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:16, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hmm, I never saw it before. The shotgun is the 870 MCS and the pistol is the Glock 17. If you look at the page, he's level 0 with no XP, so these are the first unlocks, which makes sense given what they are: a shotgun, a pistol that isn't faction-based that's similar to the M9 and MP443, and a PDW. Also, now that the PP2000 has a stock we won't have any more stockless guns, specifically stockless guns with scopes... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:08, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, the magazine tube is rather short for M870 MCS. Which would mean it is rather regular variant of M870 with pistol grip and full stock. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:49, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, the MCS is modular, hence the name, it just has the 4 round tube as standard, with the 7 round one as an attachment. This is the MCS: http://www.kiesler.com/shop/ProductImages/Model870MCS_PartSLG.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:57, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The magazine tube in MCS is supposed to have the same length as the barrel as can be seen here: [http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/Firearms/Shotguns%20Pump/MCS.aspx Remington Model 870 Modular Combat Shotgun (MCS)]. Thus the 3+1 MCS would have the same 10&amp;quot; barrel. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:23, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I understand it's supposed to, but it's still an MCS, just not assembled properly or something. If you don't like it, just use the extended tube attachment, I know I will be, and Demize confirmed (how many times have I written those two words now?) all the extended mag attachments are visible, like the MP7s 40 round magazine, or this shotgun. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:50, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::If that's so... Okey, an oddly assembled MCS ¯\(°_o)/¯&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::P.S. I didn't count how many times you have written those two words D: --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:02, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::LOL! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:08, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Demize confirmed that Alex says 'Demize confirmed' a lot. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:00, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::[http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg/hr/im-metal-hs-2000-e.html XD] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACR?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOHjF4_apI&amp;amp;feature=channel_video_title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magpul Masada/ ACR?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 0:36, the handguard and flashhider look very similar to that of the ACR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it might be the SG 553, also has a similar flashhider. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:07, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree, it is the SG 553. Can tell by the design of the rail system, shape of the receiver and the fact that it has a smooth curve to the top of the stock rather than an adjustable cheek riser.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 12:14, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also see the M320 Launcher at 0:41, so thats one more launcher for the page [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:09, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ugh, what a song choice :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whine, whine, whine. No game is good enough for you people. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:41, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not game - song &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, finally can see the M320 mounted instead of standalone :D And yeah, I agree that's the 553. Oh, and what do you mean &amp;quot;you people&amp;quot;? Lol ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:05, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I thought you were complaining about the game. I was just joking when I said that. *rolls eyes* - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:44, 27 September 2011 (CDT)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NDA for Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, from what I'm hearing the Beta is going to be subject to an NDA, just like the Alpha. This may just be for the early access and may be rescinded once it goes public, or it may be for the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What this means is that we can't post info or shots from the Beta build until it is rescinded. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:02, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://twitter.com/#!/zh1nt0/status/115781634879524864 Disregard.] I screwed up, again. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:15, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha :) That's good news [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:18, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G17C modelled after G17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just talked to a DICE dev on Steam, and he told me the reason they modelled the G17C after a regular G17 it's to save prestanda so the game can run as smoothly as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
So that's why is missing those compesators &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; on the slide. And the reason they decided to still call it a G17C, is because is only a minor detail. They probably have more relevant things to fix, than changing the correct name of a weapon. edit: forgot to sign [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's understandable, given the crazy graphics and everthing else this game it running. If they don't change it we'll note it as incorrect on the main page, but note that it was intentionally left out; if they do know the correct difference between the C and standard, but needed to do for technical reasons, I'm happy. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:33, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But someone could state in the main page, that it was left there intentionally due to some other and more important things to worry about in the development of the game. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess that proves that Frostbite 2 Engine is much more complicated and difficult to mod than Refractor 2 Engine. To fix weapon's name in Battlefield 2 one needed a mere Notepad ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:57, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well not change, since the config files will have weapon names in plain text that can be replaced (unless the names are actually images or something). [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:49, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's stupid what the guy from DICE said: &amp;quot;''We modeled the gun after the regular G17 so the game would run faster...''&amp;quot; Huh? So if the gun is actually a 100% G17, why call G17C? Am I missing something here? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 04:10, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Modelling the holes ''would'' require they put an inside surface on the barrel, but I can't see how an engine that features buildings falling into hundreds of pieces of high-detail rubble would be screwed over by that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:47, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corrected some information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went through and fixed some things. There is a Korean M16 that has 4 firing modes and the shotgun in Op Gullotine is a Remington 870 which you can tell by looking at the rear sight. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:23, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has four? Cool, didn't know that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:41, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lack of weapon variety ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theres so many AK and M4 style weapons but no real variety, wheres the steyr, uzi and such.&lt;br /&gt;
The snipers are pretty much useless after the first two so why change ?&lt;br /&gt;
Like 3 AK styled assault rifles ?&lt;br /&gt;
Am i missing the point because it seems Mw3 has a much better weapon variety.&lt;br /&gt;
When i unlocked the SkS it takes 4 bullets to kill. That's double what the other two took even though they're the same calibre. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are lazy. Quite a bunch of unlocks are derivatives of starting weapons. There are so many European weapons that could be put as unlocks, but nooooo! Maybe DICE are saving for DLCs? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah when they said 10 times the unlocks, who knew they meant dogtags and pistols with new attachments. And we have to unlock the same attachments for every other gun over and over. Whats with the lack of guns ? :/ And Some weapons like the m16 take 6 bullets to kill... the ump takes 7 from my experience. So why even bother using these weapons when i can have a sniper that 2 hit kills with a RDS. The beta has dissapointed me. --[[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Maybe the game will have a &amp;quot;Hardcore&amp;quot; mode like the Modern Warfere games. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:51, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Always fun when people complain about balance before the balance has had any meaningful time to settle. Tomorrow people will be complaining half these things are totally overpowered when they figure out how to use them properly. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:34, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Im not complaining about balance, if AR's take 6 hits to kill, i dont mind ill stick to my battle rifle. Just wish there was more variety is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, from trying the PS3 beta it seemed all my weapons took ~6 hits to kill while all their weapons killed me instantly. Nothing like repeatedly being murdered by a spawncamper with, of all the goddamn things in the world, a UMP. &amp;gt;:( [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All of the 5.56mm (and 9mm) weapons do 25 damage at point blank, making them 4 hit kill, and start dropping after about 20 feet, so 5 at midrange seems better, but could be 6, I can't see how far you're shooting. Also, all the 7.62mm (and .45) guns do 33.4 damage at point blank. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, I hope they fix the damage, from what I'm reading it's pretty stupid right now. :\ - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:35, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Personnally I like the fact that there are many AK &amp;amp; AR15 style firearms in it, and for that you have to unlock the attachements for each gun, I don't see a problem there, you just have to use the guns if you really want them. --[[User:VillageFroid|VillageFroid]] 12:11 October 2 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yeah i dont mind unlocking the same attachments over and over its just that they said there's 10 times the unlocks and not the same unlock 10 times however the amount of attachments is a nice touch. I just wish there was more weapons is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There, I removed all Kalashnikov and Stoner weapons and thats what is left, why are you guys complaining? The weapon selection is good. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:04, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G3A3 &lt;br /&gt;
AN-94 &lt;br /&gt;
KH2002 &lt;br /&gt;
AEK-971 &lt;br /&gt;
F2000 &lt;br /&gt;
AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer) &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
G36C &lt;br /&gt;
SCAR-H CQC &lt;br /&gt;
A-91 &lt;br /&gt;
SG553  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M249E2 &lt;br /&gt;
M60 &lt;br /&gt;
M240 &lt;br /&gt;
6P41 &lt;br /&gt;
QYJ 88 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SVD (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
M40A5 &lt;br /&gt;
SV98 &lt;br /&gt;
M98B &lt;br /&gt;
M82A3 (not in MP) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M39 EMR &lt;br /&gt;
SKS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P90TR &lt;br /&gt;
MP7A1 &lt;br /&gt;
UMP45 &lt;br /&gt;
PDR &lt;br /&gt;
PP2000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
870 MCS &lt;br /&gt;
M1014 &lt;br /&gt;
USAS-12  &lt;br /&gt;
Striker &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M9 (US) &lt;br /&gt;
MP443 (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
G17 &lt;br /&gt;
M-45 &lt;br /&gt;
MP412 &lt;br /&gt;
T44 &lt;br /&gt;
93R &lt;br /&gt;
G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the main game comes out, we'll all see the diversity, alot of the weapons in the Beta are mostly there for testing purposes, I haven't even seen anyone unlock ALL the weapons yet in the Beta so I'm not sure how many exist there. Plus we might also see more weapon diversity in the Singleplayer [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:To add on to my reply, I should also mention that while yes I feel a little disappointed that they didn't add some other &amp;quot;common&amp;quot; weapons like a traditional MP5 or some other weapons like certain Pump Action Shotguns, it doesn't really phase me too much, because from what I've seen thus far they've pretty much nailed some of the roles appriopriately. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:23, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok so ive done a bit of research, veteran gives you one extra weapon, Co-op gives you 6 extra weapons and the first expansion gives you 10 weapons.... thats 17 more weapons. I feel more comfortable now :) Not only that but theres plans for more expansions :) http://mp1st.com/2011/10/02/leaked-weapon-list-for-battlefield-3-back-to-karkand-dlc/ - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In realistic terms 9mm subguns and indeed subguns in general have fallen out of favour since the 80s / 90s and largely replaced by 5.56mm carbine rifles in their traditional roles as bad guys started wearing body armour. From what I've heard, neither the UMP or the MP7 did anything like as well as their older brother. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite right. The co-op and veteran weapons are among the list we have now, only the Back To Karkand expantion give new weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something that someone should suggest to the Battlefield Twitter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter so I would appreciate if someone did this for me. I want a option where I can set my spawn prefences. Right now I'm using the UMP 45 and each time I spawn, I set it to 2 round burst and turn off the tac light till I need it. I would like if I can set an option that I spawn the way I want and not full auto. Most of the time I don't use full auto unless its a machine gun. Ghost Recon had this option and I liked it. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 13:26, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excited ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im excited that this game will be more realistic than most others. I like the fact we will also be able to use selector switches. Did I hear right? The UMP-45 has a two round burst mode? I wasn't aware the UMP had a burst mode. I always thought it had Semi and auto.--[[User:Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can have a semi, 2-round burst, auto trigger group option. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:48, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Duh, that's what manufacturer's sites for ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.heckler-koch.de/HKWebText/detailPara/1926/82/4/20/213 UMP on H&amp;amp;K's European site]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/ump_specs.asp UMP on H&amp;amp;K's US site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H&amp;amp;K is usually pretty good about having burst option trigger packs. You just don't hear about it very often because in most movies and television shows, the selector is always set to rock n roll.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 18:22, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=4707&amp;amp;sid=91faa55311d7c875027fba7bd657d6fb&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A whole bunch of leaked info, from the game files I believe. The working names for some SP missions, and all the Co-op and MP maps too, as well as the unique to BTK weapon list. Note that they incorrectly call the HK53 an MP5, even though it actually was called HK53 in BF2 :confused face: As of now it is unknown whether these will carry over to the standard game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-FAMAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-HK53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MGs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBB-95&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-MG36&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L96&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SMG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-PP-19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotgun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Jackhammer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:33, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LOL, Jackhammer is back. That was the only prototype gun in BF2 xD&lt;br /&gt;
:'''@Alex''' HK53 was the carbine for Euro Force's Spec Ops class. Whether MP5 was the submachine gun for USMC's Anti-Tank class ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Edit:''' Ah, I've read the thread. There are probably going to be both weapons in the DLC \o/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure would love to see the FAMAS. I was secretly hoping for the XM8 to return, but I guess you can't get everything. [[user:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 11:40, 3 October 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The XM8 did return, it's called the G36. They just didn't put it inside a silly plastic model spaceship. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 11:19, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well said. I have to agree you on that, I prefer the actual G36 rather than the 'uber-futuristic-tacticool' plastic prototype that is... wait, was... wait it didn't even leave the prototype stages... well anyways, that is the xm8 --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] 12:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== .44 Magnumn, M60, USAS-12 and Claymore gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Found some videos of the Claymore and Revolver in action, looks like the T-44 is just called .44 Magnum any idea what kind of revolver it is? Also M60E4 is seen in one vid with a 200 round capacity and USAS-12 with a 7 round box mag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLW7WcIv_gA&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExvIOmviDgw&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 16:06, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a [[Taurus Model 44]]. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess DICE followed IW's example. They named Colt Anaconda simply &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot; before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm liking the new .44 Magnum from what Videos I've seen so far. Up close it seems to behave just like how a .44 Magnum should. At short-close range (10 or less feet) it seems to kill in one shot to the upper chest/head but further distances (up to say 30-40 feet) seem to kill in 2 shots to the body or one to the head. Plus with addition of a Scoped version, I can see this being the ideal &amp;quot;Mini-Sniper&amp;quot;. I think the way there going about it is the MP412 is the better option up close while the .44 Mag is better at range. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 07:28, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the description of the HK416 on the main page and there is something I don't quite understand.&lt;br /&gt;
In the main page it states that the weapon in-game has 3 firing modes; semi, 3-round burst and auto and that there aren't many Stoner lower receivers that support 3 firing modes. But isn't the Stoner platform manufactured by KAC? And why is it being use on a HK manufactured weapon? And if that is the case, then shouldn't it be pointed out as custom HK416?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And my other question is about the licensing of the weapons. Since there are other HK weapons that goes by their correct names like the MP7A1, G36C, M27 IAR and M320. Why would they license those particular weapons and not the HK416, making DICE name it M416? I think is most likely a misunderstanding rather than a copyright issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please correct me here if I'm wrong. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:24, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are hell-bent on making HK416 the US' service rifle. Can't think of any other reason. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:38, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's because &amp;quot;HK416&amp;quot; has HK's company name right there in the weapon name. It might be more of a copyright thing. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 21:01, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eugene Stoner is the inventor of the the AR 15/AR10/M16/M4. The name for the platform as a whole is the Stoner. There are over 100 manufacturers of AR 15s in the US. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:55, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably what Masterius and Gato said, the Devs really, really want the HK416 to be the US standard (cause it ID better) :) And it has HK in the name, same reason the Glocks are G17/18. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:11, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although Battlefield 2 had HK21 and HK53... And this makes me curious. Are they going to rename HK53 if/when it comes back? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:50, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh right, well then it's probably the same reason the Striker is still the DAO-12, they kept the name the same as it's always been in BF. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:52, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glitch with the PDR? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else notice whenever you're using the PDR, It randomly switches from a 20 round mag to a 30 round mag? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:45, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently the extended mags are included by default.  They're taken off if you have any barrel attachment. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:58, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=5033&amp;amp;sid=fa2af8c4723e98f64dadab8b5b9897d8&lt;br /&gt;
At the bottom. In one we can see a suppressed M40A5, and in on of the AKS-74U ones we can see his Coop buddy has a KH2002. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:54, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS iron-sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone remember which sight you would use in the beta if you were using an M26 mounted on one of the assault rifles? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:48, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I never used the M26 in the beta, but with the M320 mounted on a rifle you would just zoom halfway in, a la the shotguns in previous Battlefield games. I reckon that the M26 would do the same. [[User:Krakydak|Krakydak]] 17:56, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same irons as the P90, Striker, F2000, M40A3, and M98B; the aftermarket ones. Oh wait, ON the AR? The AR's sights, like Crysis 2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:29, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why is the &amp;quot;RPK 74M&amp;quot; chambered in 7.62x39 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111001163136/battlefield/images/5/5f/RPK-74M.png Look here]... note the curvature of the magazine, the lack of the flash hider, the steel ribbed mag.... why can't games ever get the RPK right? Either putting a 75 round drum on the 74M, or this....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A lot of the pics on Battlelog were wrong, like the G18's pic was a 17, but it does have the selector in game. Let me see an in game pic with the 7.62 mag, and I'll agree. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:36, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rather odd that [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/ak74m_656x369.png?cb=1317663410 AK-74M] has proper image but [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/rpk_656x369.png?cb=1317663545 RPK-74M] has black RPK (not even RPKM) instead. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:06, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::On a side note: do 45-round STANAG magazines even exist? Talking about [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/m27_656x369.png?cb=1317664019 M27].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110929075021/battlefield/images/6/69/RPK_-_Beta.gif] that's it in first person, trust me the mag is a 7.62 ribbed steel mag in the game, I can't find a screenshot, but you can see it in the right light while reloading....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes! Not military issue, but I don't get the point of the M27 as a support weapon IRL, this helps at least. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=26456/Product/AR-15-M16-45-ROUND-MAGAZINE [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, cool. Didn't know that :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I didn't know that stuff about the AKs, it's what we're all here for :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:19, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah! :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:52, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I am adding renders of all the weapons from the offical site. In case anyone thinks I missed them, the MP-443, M16A3, F2000 Tactical, KH2002, M16A4, AKS-74U, M4, A-91, and GP-30 do not have entries there yet, but I will add them here when they do. Well, except the GP-30, because I doubt it will get one... poor GP-30 :'( EDIT: Done! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:43, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for this being offtopic:&lt;br /&gt;
:I wish Devs added [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=271&amp;amp;backPID=265&amp;amp;productID=89&amp;amp;pid_product=297&amp;amp;pidList=265&amp;amp;categorySelector=7&amp;amp;detail=&amp;amp;cHash=a367c3feaf GL1] to F2000, [http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?Itemid=5&amp;amp;catid=20:all-other-weapons&amp;amp;id=36:the-hk79-underbarrel-grenade-launcher&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article HK79] to G3 and [http://kbptula.ru/eng/str/strelk/556a91.htm the unnamed UGL] to A-91 (with the barrel length of 415 mm (same as AK-74M), it would be classified as assault rifle (compact one though, because its overall length is lesser than that of AK-74M with stock folded [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_a91m_eng.html] [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_ak-74m_eng.html] )). But that's probably would be too much to ask :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:54, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would have been nice, though, the F2000's GL1 is solved by not letting it mount a GL, and we haven't seen one mounted to the G3 yet. Who knows, maybe it will become an HK79 like the GP-30 :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:06, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things: this site doesn't have a KH2002 page, and if there's a newer version from 2009, shouldn't they have named it KH2009? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't even find any sources mentioning 2009. They just say KH2002 was revealed to public\entered service in 2004 and show the pictures of either long carrying handle or short carrying handle (the most seen one) variant :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:37, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are 3 different versions of the KH2002 I have seen. The first is the initial 2002 model which has a short carry handle and front sight post at the front of the receiver. Then there is the 2006 model that has a long carry handle and no front sight post. Lastly there is the 2009 model that has the long carry handle but a barrel mounted front sight post along with a built up finger grooved front grip. Not sure about the dates, but this is deffinitely the way the KH2002 design progressed. I have also heard that there are three different barrel lengths for the KH2002, but I have only seen the standard length (pictured) and the short barrel, which was on an original model, with the barrel ending at the end of the receiver. Have never seen a picture of the DMR length barrel. As for the name being KH2002, all I can say is that M1903s made in the 30s were called M1903A1s and not M1930s. It is basically the same rifle, so why change the name.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:31, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah true, I guess I'm just thinking there should be some way to tell them apart by name. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:53, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After a bit of research, I found out that the version in this game (have seen exactly the same gun with and without front sight post so not sure which is the correct one, or maybe it is detached when optics are added which appear to be a copy of the old Colt 4x20 scope) is not called the Khaybar but the Sama, so will change the article accordingly.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.irandefence.net/showthread.php?t=44114 This the source], correct? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::First saw it mentioned on MilitaryPhotos.net, but it is mentioned on quite a few Iranian defence forums and blogs that the most recent version (the one in the game) is called the Sama rather than the Khaybar.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:25, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Makarov PB (6P9) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dogtags :) http://www.enterbf3.com/news/579-159-battlefield-3-dog-tags/ What's interesting is, if you look below the M39 in the bottom rightish, there's a Makarov PB, beside the suppressed M9. I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a suppressed MP-443, or if it will actually be in, but it's very interesting. Also note a lot of weapons seem to be missing, most likely since this isn't the full selection of dogtags. Oh, and there's two P90s, someone screwed up :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ya the USAS-12 dogtag shows a SPAS-12 instead--[[User:Anarchy66660|Anarchy66660]] 01:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The designer of PB isn't Makarov, it's Deryagin[http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_spesial_pb_eng.html] :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I was just assuming it was Makarov :/ At any rate, has it ever been in a BF game before? If it's in this one I'm gonna totally use it with the AS :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Makarov but still no USP? :( [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 08:29, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sure MW3 will have more USPs than you can shake a stick at. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 23:24, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic changes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For some reason during the Faultline demo, the M4s were all equipped with ACOGs and the SAW gets the EOtech, but in the actual game, they reverse it where all the M4s during the mission have EOtechs and the SAW had the ACOG. Just something I noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my problem is when an M4 is equipped with an ACOG, we still see the front sight post, but when we aimed, the front sight post disappeared when in reality, we should be able to see see it [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:11, 25 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason for that is because most videogames don't ''do'' scopes, at least not properly. Typically (there's some exceptions) the game removes the rifle viewmodel completely and slaps an overlay over the screen to represent the scope. This results in glitches like drawing the scope a frame too early and ending up looking down the scope overlay at the rifle itself, or, as here, the front sight going AWOL along with the rest of the rifle. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:10, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we need to crop the renders down; that's a lot of white space. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 03:34, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Click the images and look at the sizes, if you do that you'll end up with them about 200 pixels across. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:54, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:So we're padding images then? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:47, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I got those, and those are the originals, as big as they come. If we find bigger ones later, feel free to replace them, but the I after saving 50ish pics, resaving them all as jpegs so they'd work here, uploading them all one at a time, and adding them all to the page, I didn't feel like taking the time to crop :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:20, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally those &amp;quot;in game renders&amp;quot; look to actually be the renders the pickup icons are the outlines of. Hence them lacking rear sights on weapons that can mount optics. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:59, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah they do, good catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I got this one ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just uploaded a few screens as tests, I'll do more when I'm awake enough to not suck horribly at the game. Also, this page is a hideous mess. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:07, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just play SP Campaign on Easiest difficulty ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, is Co-op mode using the same missions as SP? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:48, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Apparently not, one of the guys on the forum says there's one co-op mission with a controllable helicopter. I wouldn't know, I've only owned the game for three hours. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:51, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: There is one mission where you spend the entire level in an AH1Z Viper and it's pretty much target practice to get used to the chopper controls as the enemy AI have a hard time figuring out if their weapons are actually guns or if they're just oddly shaped Easy Bake Ovens. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:51, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now taking shots from the PC version using FRAPS instead, since while the game has a screenshot directory it doesn't seem to have a screenshot hotkey assigned. Sadly this does mean some jpeg artifacts on the full-sze images since FRAPS has no quality settings; I'll try re-taking these shots as Bitmaps and then converting them manually to see if that looks any better. I tried Irfanview but it can't take shots of the game window. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 12:01, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A question about the AEK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it really the AEK-971s or just a misnamed AEK-971? The render pic shows the 971 variant, as the 971s has its selector on the right side, differently angled pistol grip, plus collapsible buttstock. I'm just curious. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 16:15, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's called AEK-971 in game, but I added the &amp;quot;s&amp;quot; as it has 3-round burst. If that's wrong feel free to change :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What '''bozitojugg3rn4ut''' said: the 'S' variants are easily identifiable by collapsible stock. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:31, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:AEK-973S.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AEK-973S - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then I suggest changing the name back to 971 and adding a note about the incorrect burst mode, which is also only on the &amp;quot;s&amp;quot; version. (It is interesting tho, that the prototype version had the selector on the right side, then they moved it to the left, and then back to the right again.) - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 05:57, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The 3-round burst fire mode is present in the updated AEKs (not only AEK 'S' variants), so it isn't incorrect. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:09, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right, my bad --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 06:21, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::EW that pistol grip is ugly! Okay, so it's right for the version in game to have 3-round burst, but it's the standard not the &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;? Sounds good :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:23, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Pistol grip kinda reminds me of German FG-42, early version :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:52, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[File:FG421stPattern.jpg|thumb|none|600px|FG-42, early version - 7.92x57mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not as ugly, but it certainly looks awkward [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:22, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something Odd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed something odd when I played the campaign and I'm sure others have noticed too. I'll try not to spoil it for anyone who hasn't played yet. In the game's prologue, when you disarm the terrorist who has an UMP strapped to his back, your character fires a burst from the weapon out the window then takes the weapon. When the game gives you back control, it turns into a AKS-74U. I thought it might be a glitch but when it happened towards the end of the campaign again, I knew something was off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one that finds this odd? --[[User:Bad Boy|Bad Boy]] 23:37, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was watching my buddy play and noticed it as well. My first thought was &amp;quot;WTF did that AKS-74U come from!?&amp;quot;-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 00:42, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It showed the correct models for me. What console are you playing on? It might be a console-specific glitch. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 02:20, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought I saw one on the ground before the guy attacked, I'll check. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:24, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I played it on the 360 and it did the same for me as well [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 10:02, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Saw the same thing on PC, it's  weird. Also, you fire the AKS-74u, but when you take it, the magazine is full--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] 08:12, 30 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that was pretty strange :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:21, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I played this on the PS3 at the midnight release when I was waiting to pick up my Xbox360 and on the PS3 it was an AK. For some reason, it's different on the Xbox. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 10:02, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right, so I'm definately going to be buying another copy of this for IMFDB. :) [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:04, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So PC and 360 are a UMP, and PS3 has the correct 74u?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I just checked again on PC. It is indeed an AKS-74U for me. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 16:18, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wierd, I guess it's just us 360 users then :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:01, 31 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The AKS-74U in that scene has appeared as a UMP a couple times for me (I'm PS3), only to become the AKS in Blackburn's hands. I figure it's some kind of bug. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:29, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Never seen that on PC and I played this level about ten times while I was trying to figure out a way to get captures. Perhaps on consoles the code that generates enemies with random weapons isn't disabled for this guy; you get the AK regardless because you don't pick up his weapon from the ground, the game gives it to you after the QTE. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 18:52, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could be something like that, but if it's not an AK, it's ''always'' a UMP. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:59, 7 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::IIRC all the guards on the train normally spawn with AKs with no mods, perhaps that guard is the ''only'' enemy set to random and the random weaponset for that level is AK and UMP. Like how in the next level guards are set to drop AK / G3 / RPK with random chances of specific mods. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:11, 7 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's the exact opposite for me. The most commonly spawned weapons there are UMPs rather than AKs. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:19, 7 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proof:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-AKS-74U-1.jpg|thumb|none|601px|It's just you.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 12:03, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why the hell does it have a milled receiver? - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 12:20, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've wondered the same thing myself. It has the cuts of the old milled receivers as well as the dimples above the magazine well on the stamped receivers. It was also like that in Bad Company 2. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 12:25, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Very... odd. AKS-74U, built of AK-47 o_O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:46, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fun tip==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fail the rat QTE on Uprising. The result is hilarious. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:17, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Guard Rat :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:51, 29 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/critical-miss/9197-Critical-Miss-Battlefield-3 Critical Miss: Battlefield 3]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Haven't done so, but I'm gonna try that. That is one ballsy ass rat, though. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 11:32, 1 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Damn Warf rats. DX - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 11:12, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== armsel striker (dao12) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In default version it has a.f.a.i.k. 8 rounds and 12 with extended mag. For other shotguns place of extended mags takes flashlights, but here place of ammo take additional TOUGHNESS. In pure form. B.T.W. 7x scope + frag12 ammo is so much fun, both on a.s. and 870, and also hilariously looking. --[[User:Agof|Agof]] 00:16, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvht4v-NJIw&amp;amp;hd=1&amp;amp;t=6m10s --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:35, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Never playing on regenerationcore. So, frags are more than cool, you just got sniper grenade launcher, you can kill them with fragments or just headshooting. Checked, 8 and 12 in the same size of drum. --[[User:Agof|Agof]] 12:50, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's most likely because they don't want players running around with the full 12 rounds and being able to use other attachments. So, like the M249 and QJY-88, it's ''supposed'' to have the Extended Mag attachment, but you don't have to use it. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:29, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Attachment for Striker: 'Fully Accessible Cylinder' :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:03, 3 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lol :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:22, 3 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MBT HMG ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should all try it, it's really funny :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:38, 2 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Its really funny how inaccurate it is [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 18:27, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you wanna talk ridiculous, use the canister shells on the tanks. 120mm shotgun, essentially. If you're really good and lucky, you can shoot down a helicopter or even a jet with them. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 19:51, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone else think that the SA-18 is actually based off the SA-7 Grail. Look closely at the hanguard and the the stock and also barrel and end tube and compare with the SA-7. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 14:19, 3 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is the in-game model the same as render? If yes, then it should be changed to SA-7 Grail (9K32 &amp;quot;Strela-2&amp;quot;). If no, then, as Alex said, the render is wrong. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:14, 4 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My Renders :( ==&lt;br /&gt;
Someone remove half of them :/ I'm getting the complete set (and slightly bigger) ones from Battlelog now, so I'll re-add them all. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:54, 5 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Naw, don't bother. It's not like they're in-game renders as far as I can tell, and if they are I can just get the weapons on the ground instead. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:57, 5 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Good idea, I just can't cause I'm on 360 and don't have a capture device :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 5 November 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hybrid? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone enlighten me how the SAW is a &amp;quot;hybrid&amp;quot; of the M249 and Mark 46? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:39, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's more or less a Mark 46, but it has a STANAG mag well, which the Mark 46 lacks. [[User:Krakydak|Krakydak]] 12:45, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's an M249 with all of the parts unique to the Mk 46 fitted. Wait, shouldn't that make it a Minimi variant, and not an M249, since it doesn't have any M249-specific parts, like the heat shield? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:40, 6 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::What unique Mark 46 components are there other than the rail system? I ask because all I see is an M249 with a Mark 46 rail system, which doesn't really fit the description of a hybrid since said rail system can be pulled from a Mark 46 and put on an M249. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:16, 7 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It has an M249E2 stock, with an M249E3 barrel, with a Mk 46 Mod 0 rail system. The Mk 46 has the short barrel and full stock like the one in game, but no other variant has that combo. Would it be an M249E2 with an M249E3 barrel and a Mk 46 RIS, or an M249E3 with an M249E2 full stock and a Mk 46 RIS? Which would be more right? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:34, 9 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Let's just stick with &amp;quot;hybrid&amp;quot;, it's easier. XD But I've added a bit more detailed description of the mix of components. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 14:39, 9 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I like yours, let's go with that, but take off hybrid in the title. EDIT: Because we don't call the BF3 93R a &amp;quot;92SB / 93R Hybrid&amp;quot;, it's a 92SB with some 93R parts. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:59, 9 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Doesn't 'SAW' identify the full length barrel and 'Paratrooper' the short length barrel? I'm confused :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:23, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::No, SAW is the role of the weapon (&amp;quot;squad automatic weapon&amp;quot;), it doesn't denote a specific length. All M249s are called SAW because they're all used in that role. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:25, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:29, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::There are three M249's: the old M249E1, which has the metal stock, the M249E2, which has the polymer stock (this is standard or normal one), and the M249E3, usually called the Paratrooper variant, which has the short barrel and collapsible stock. The &amp;quot;SAW&amp;quot; part is kind of a name added to the designation, like M14 EBR, M27 IAR, M26 MASS, MP-412 REX, etc. The technical designations are just the M14, M27, M26, and MP-412 parts. The second part would only be part of the actual name if it depicted a very specific variant, like the 870 MCS. Also, the weapon in BF3 is correctly called an &amp;quot;M249&amp;quot;, as it is an M249, but not a specific variant. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:33, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::So this one is called correct, good :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:42, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Exactly, in the same way it's correct to say &amp;quot;M16&amp;quot; if you're talking generically, and it doesn't mean you're talking about the original Vietnam M16. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:59, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEUSOC Pistol ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we ''have'' to call it that? It's the same as calling the Striker a &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot;, it's a discription. And while it didn't for a while, we know its offical designation now: M-45. Yes, ''with'' a dash. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:07, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DICE has made up the 'DAO-12' moniker. Whether the MEU(SOC) designation exists since the mid-1980s. And since the in-game model is of original type, that's most likely what it should be called. Unless USMC has retroactively applied the M45 / M-45 (it's the same thing, you can as well say M-9, M-16, M-249, etc.) designation to the original models, but I don't know of that (too little information on the surface). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:18, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the DAO-12 was a general example, but I figured they were always called &amp;quot;M45 MEUSOC&amp;quot;, it just wasn't common knowledge until recently, or something. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:34, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here are the sources, noting the MEU(SOC) pistol getting the new designation: [http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/24/m45-close-quarters-combat-pistol/] [http://olive-drab.com/od_other_firearms_pistol_m1911.php]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:46, 10 November 2011 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=477167</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=477167"/>
		<updated>2011-10-28T18:52:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* I got this one */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== All weapons in BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list below shows all BF3 weapons that are going to be available either SP or MP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is officially announced by EA, but i'm pretty sure there will be more coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: List has been edited to account for new information (eg: Both M16s and only P90TR) and name corrections (eg: DAO-12 to Striker)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assault Rifles (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A3 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*HK416&lt;br /&gt;
*G3A3&lt;br /&gt;
*AN-94&lt;br /&gt;
*KH2002&lt;br /&gt;
*AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
*F2000&lt;br /&gt;
*AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*M4A1 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AKS-74U (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G36C&lt;br /&gt;
*SCAR-H CQC&lt;br /&gt;
*A-91&lt;br /&gt;
*SG553&lt;br /&gt;
*M4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support)&lt;br /&gt;
*M27 IAR (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M249E2&lt;br /&gt;
*M60&lt;br /&gt;
*M240&lt;br /&gt;
*6P41&lt;br /&gt;
*QYJ 88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.11 Mod.0 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*SVD (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M40A5&lt;br /&gt;
*SV98&lt;br /&gt;
*M98B&lt;br /&gt;
*M82A3 (not in MP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*M39 EMR&lt;br /&gt;
*SKS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*P90TR&lt;br /&gt;
*MP7A1&lt;br /&gt;
*UMP45&lt;br /&gt;
*PDR&lt;br /&gt;
*PP2000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*870 MCS&lt;br /&gt;
*M1014&lt;br /&gt;
*USAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
*Saiga 20K&lt;br /&gt;
*Striker&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*M9 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*MP443 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G17&lt;br /&gt;
*M-45&lt;br /&gt;
*MP412&lt;br /&gt;
*T44&lt;br /&gt;
*93R&lt;br /&gt;
*G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Underbarrels (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M320 with HE/Smoke/Buckshot rounds&lt;br /&gt;
*M26 MASS with Buckshot/Flechette/Frag/Slug rounds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocket Launchers (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.153 SMAW (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPG-7 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*FGM-148 Javelin&lt;br /&gt;
*FIM-92 Stinger&lt;br /&gt;
*SA-18 IGLA&lt;br /&gt;
*AT4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
( Source: http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ ) --Zzang1847 23.09.2011 11.07 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is from a Batlefield 3 fansite and not acctualy offical --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 14:38, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This has been discussed before. While it is technically official since the official gaming news sources are also reporting it, but since there aren't any pictures of 'em you have to wait.--[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 15:55, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pages without pictures or info look ugly. The game's out in less than a month, and the Beta's out in a few days, we can wait, but it does mean we get to know what's in the game anyway, even though it's not on the page :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:20, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although there were no pictures, i believe we still can at least put some description and real picture so someone who is actually uploading in-game pictures don't have to worry about putting explanation and finding pictures from the archive, which takes significant amount of time (in terms of AAA games like this).&lt;br /&gt;
::P.S) Sorry about this discussion already mentioned before. I thought i could give some help, but perhaps i'm not :( ~ Zzang1847 23.09.2011 8.43 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Building an article is not a race, there is just less than a week for the Beta to roll in, not that much to wait. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:52, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it is going to just be Americans, Russians, Generic &amp;quot;Not the Taliban, honest&amp;quot; Middle Eastern Militia and possibly the Iranian army as factions then. Damn. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 10:28, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For SP yeah, but for MP it's been confirmed to be just US and RU. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:46, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faction Specific Weaponry details ==&lt;br /&gt;
no need to worry , about faction specific weaponry , reading through some of Alan Kertz earlier posts.He states that the player once leveled up high enough in the class's levels will gain access to the other factions weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun disparity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the feeling the M4A1 will be the counterpart to the AKS74U. This is wrong, but every game seems to do it. The M4 has a 14.5 inch barrel and is a standard issue weapon. The AKS74U has an 8.3 inch barrel and is issued to vehicle crews. A better setup would be Mk 18 Mod O (or HK416 D10RS) vs the AKS74U. Also, the M16 and AK74 aren't exactly equal either. Maybe pair up the regular M4A1 or SCAR-L with 14.5 inch barrel (for variety) with the AK74?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and what do you think the US/EU counterparts to the SKS, RPK and AS Val will be? There's no US counterpart cartridge to the 7.62x39 and 9x39 as far as I know.&lt;br /&gt;
::There's no val, that's vss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SKS = Mk.11 = SVD. RPK = M27. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:52, 9 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its the asval not vss :S.[[User:lukewilliams010]] 12:14 ,19 august 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM\PKP operation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've yet to see a game that properly portraits PKM operation with its 2 level feeding system and non-disintegrating belts. Curious if in BF3 they'll get it right. Doubt it though...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic mounts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optic mounts on all russian weapons are wrong. Basically it's an PSO with optic tube cut off and rail slapped instead of it. Then every Russian scope has its original mount removed so it can be fixed on that picatinny rail. They also didn't bother making [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/1789/i-2863.jpg proper mount] for PKP and just put rail on top of the receiver lid. I was expecting more attention to details in BF3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the Russian army IS starting to use RIS, just look at the AK-9. [http://world.guns.ru/assault/rus/ak-9-e.html] While it does seem a bit sloppy, it can be justified in a way. At least it isn't as bad as that AK-abomination from MW2 and the RPD with rails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know when the beta is starting? cant wait for it! --[[Special:Contributions/109.78.246.33|109.78.246.33]] 21:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or for that matter, how we can get in on it? [[User:That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck|That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get into the Battlefield 3 beta, you need to buy specially-marked versions of the recent Medal Of Honor [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya i got it, do you know when were getting the codes?--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 02:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no clue.[[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you registered your Medal of Honor with your EA-Account, you'll get the invitation and infos, as soon as there is something, so far nothing is known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish I could try the beta [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not just you, after the videos they releases pretty much everybody is dying to get hands on the game. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 12:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta will be open to everyone. Those who got MoH, will get in earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-something-something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check that dude in the BG. also what I think *might* be a holster, but I'm probably wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf6.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's definitely an AK-series rifle, which one I can't be sure of. If I had to guess however, I'd say either an AK-74, AK-74M, or AK-101. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 08:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a dump bag on his hip. At least that's what I think it is. It definitely isn't a holster though, since most drop leg holsters are strapped to your thigh. Why a guy with a belt fed machine gun has a dump bag through is beyond me.--[[User:1SAZ|1SAZ]] 09:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If I had to guess, he may have been issued an M4 or M16 and picked up the MG prior to the pic being taken. You can also see some STANAG mag pouches on the front of his vest too. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I Agree with  Orca1, I know you can't see from the distance, but the profile of the muzzle looks like one of those 3. As the game is set in 2014, im assuming it's either an AK-74M or AK-101. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240G is M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M240G is actually a M240B as seen by gameplay screenshots. You can also identify it's M240B by the heat shield. I guess that inaccuracy in every war game (including new games) will always be. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I knew it was some kind of M240 variant, but since it was being used by a Marine I assumed it was the 240-Golf variant since they typically use that instead of the 240-Bravo. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrong use of the word &amp;quot;anachronistic&amp;quot; there. An anachronism is an object, event, or person portrayed in a chronologically inaccurate time period. The Marines using the M240B is a mistake, no doubt, but it's not an anachronism as the M240B still does technically ''exist'' at the same time beside the Golf model. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:42, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got these pics off BF3 nation;&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf1.jpg appears to be some M16 varient which oddly enough doesnt have any rear sights.&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf5.jpg Another shot of the M16 like weapon (Just going to mention the nice detail on the mag). And hey, new weapon, A COFFEE MUG!!! &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 15:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an M16A4, the developers probably didn't detailed the weapon enough. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 16:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this as well. Im guessing they just forgot, The sights are even not there in the gameplay videos. I do hope they change it though, might seen a little silly firing with neither iron sights or optics. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the new 12 min trailer, roughly at the 7min mark when they put surpessive fire on the sniper, is it me or does the guy on the left, with the M16A4 fire full auto?. [[User:Sike|Sike]] 17:20, 18 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm commenting without checking, but remember how fast you can fire the M16A4 and 93R in BC2? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:23, 19 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racking charging handle when reloading after empty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new trailer showed you shooting an M4 and when you are empty, you reload but instead of pressing the bolt release, you charge the handle. I seriously hope this isn't the default reload [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the begining of the trailer, it did say that it was pre-alpha code.  They'll hopefully have the modeling and other animations fixed by then.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 05:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, cause I'm getting bad flashbacks to games in early 2000 that pulls the charging handle when doing mid mag reloads [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I remember correctly, the M16A2 &amp;amp; M4A1 reloading animations from ''[[Battlefield 2|BF2]]'' had the character use the charging handle instead of the bolt release when reloading, they may have borrowed that. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 05:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3D modeling and animation is kinda hard to &amp;quot;borrow&amp;quot; from older engine/file format. I'd guess it's probably &amp;quot;director thinks this looks more dynamic&amp;quot; like [[Black]], or maybe the animator is under heavy influence of games in early 2000 :/ [[User:Ssate|Ssate]] 02:43, 12 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I hope they change it to using bolt release because it's wield for someone to do that unless you're clearing a malfunction [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 06:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm liking how they now keep track of a round in the chamber and you don't go through the whole reloading animation, maybe this time we'll have proper pistol reloads.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; pistol reload? [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 20:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think he meant that the slide does not lock back when the pistol runs out, like in Medal Of Honor MP. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 20:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in Bad Company and the second one they did the same thing where the slide didn't lock back. If it's one thing Modern Warfare has done right is the reload animation...well except maybe for the ACR. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also a problem with the SPAS-12: the character pump it after the reload even if there was a shell in the chamber. Same in Black Ops. Not to mention that &amp;quot;all pistols were DAO&amp;quot; since the hammers never move. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 08:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About reloads, in last years Metal of Honor, you do a combat reload when your shotgun is empty. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another nice touch that they put in was that they left the front sight on the M4 even though it has an optical sight.  In most games the front sight is either removed completely (like Bad Company 2 or Call of Duty 4) or else it has a flip down front sight (like Modern Warfare 2).  Adds a nice level of realism in my opinion.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I always thought removing the front sight from M4/M16 rifles in games was utterly stupid mall ninja BS, not to mention making the gun look ugly as sin. In a real-world situation, if your optic fails and you don't have any iron sights to fall back on, you're basically SOL while the other guy who's never even heard of a red dot sight is still capable of sending rounds your way. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 10:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't some optics already mount back-up irons (BUS / BUIS) on them? [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:46, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this too. All BF games seem to get reloads completely wrong. You get the feeling the make you rack the charging handle with a mid mag reload to clear the current round so they don't have to take it into account. As awesome as charging the action yourself, or racking the top slide looks, you just never do it during a normal reload. I do hope they change this yeah, but I doubt they will looking back at the other games. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE Battlefield games, but I don't see how its that hard to get weapons right when they hire Ex-military guys to get everything else right. You can even find these things on Google these days. And with COD removing the iron sights on the M16s and M4s they are also removing the gas block. The gun would have to fire one round and then the action be charged manually. I love these games, but some times the ignorance they show towards the things they claim are most important pisses me off a bit.--[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, at least they don't go the extra mile and have guns being fired with the safety on, I can think of a couple of games that do that. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 14:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The use of military and ex-military people are for realistic look of the soldiers, their movements, they communications, and look of ground vehicles and aircraft... But don't forget that it is not that hard to search for photos in the internet of weapons, vehicles, aircraft, uniforms, equipment, etc. and create it in the computer, without using the help of the military guys. As what we see know. BF3 goes for the realistic way, that's right, but it is not realistic in the small details. CoD4:MW, CoD:MW2, CoD:BO, the new MoH, OFP series, ArmA series, and of course the series of BF from BF2 and onwards have so many unrealistic small details that can be fixed easily by using mod tools. The developers doesn't really care if the M4A1 has gas block (CoD) or if you charge the weapon with the charging handle (BF2, BF3), they just want to create a game, realistic or not just the gamers will be happy. It is a bit funny as so many things are so realistic in this game but someone who has good military knowledge will notice right away for the f*** ups. In OFP:RR for example, they only thing that bothers me is that the M16A4 in-game looks like the Canadian C7 rifle. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 18:50, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
don't forget in MW2, fans were commenting that the rear flip up sight on the SCAR was backwards and would back towards the shooter and not forward. IW didn't change it cause they don't care of the little details. Also I like to see a game where they have a random chance to destroy your optic so can you actually can flip up your irons. After the EMP in MW2, they forgot that pretty much all the M4s and SCARS had flip up sights but none of them bothered to flip them up. That'll be the first thing I noticed when I aim or the fact that the ACOG is not electronic and would still work when an EMP hits. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 19:43, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let's not forget MW2 is the same game which showed the Model 1887 being reloaded by having every cartridge put into the barrel. Would certainly make for an interesting first shot... [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 19:58, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In the words of the Demo Man from ''[[Team Fortress 2]]'', &amp;quot;Ka-BOOM!&amp;quot; :P [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 20:18, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New behind-the-scenes footage reveals that there are partial reload animations --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 20:16, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked how ''[[Project Reality]]'' completely replaced the M16/M4 reload animation from ''BF2''; the only time the charging handle is messed with is when you first bring the weapon up, and even then it's more of a brass check than a full pull back. The reloading animation has you swap the mags, hit the bolt release, and check the ejection port. Much more realistic reloading animation. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 07:03, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I wish is adding different animation for reloads. If you are in the middle of an intense fire fight, you reload and press the bolt faster and you randomly fumble with your reload cause it happens. Or if the firefight is over, you do a more slow reload. Also if the gun has flip up sights, I want to see an animation where you actually flip those irons up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:02, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think I'd be happy with the former; same as random jams or giving singleplayer enemies a chance of getting an instakill headshot on the player, it isn't much fun having the game secretly flipping a coin to decide if you get screwed or not. ''Black'' did slower reloads if you weren't being fired at, though; it either sped the whole animation up or skipped the unnecessary wanking around if you were being shot at when you pressed reload. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:50, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing about leaving the front sight post on the M4s is that the red dot sight is raised and not like in COD4 where it is mounted on the rail. Maybe in real life, having 2 eyes would sort of work, but even then you can still have a front post bother your eye looking at it. It wouldn't be a clear shot [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:04, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only game I've seen that gets it all right is Crysis 2, and the weapons are all fictional, though they could all easily exist. It's got both reload animations (six actually, because you do them different in Armour or Stealth mode), +1 in the chamber, attachments on your gun based on where they're mounted (one optic, a suppressor or no suppressor, and an underbarrel), believable damages based on calibres, functioning pistol hammers, and pistol slides that lock back when empty and not as part of the reload animation (meaning you can run around and stuff with a locked empty pistol). [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:02, 16 March 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the left on the bridge an enemy soldier have a Pkm machine gun :&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Battlefield3_Gogogo.jpg (high resolution sorry) [[User:Arrak|Arrak]]&lt;br /&gt;
:PKP&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disable Vehicles == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info at Kotaku and others mentions &amp;quot;Temporarily disabling vehicles&amp;quot;. I'm thinking it may be some sort of EMP thing, though, even for BF that's a stretch. What would be preferable, is if for instance... a tank... had several parts that were damageable. Things like treads, optics, engines, etc could be disabled in order to halt a tank. Same goes with tires and stuff like that with other vehicles. This'd be really cool in my opinion, for instance, snipers could damage the optics of a tank with say a .50 BMG round, temporarily of course. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:23, 3 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 Carry Handle Fix ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If anybody's seen the EA PWNED BF3 episode, it looks like they've added the carry handle to the M16A4. Two short clips demonstrating the ANT animation system that show the M16A4 with it. Good stuff. Also, did anyone notice how they're making prone realistic? It seems they're having the player's elbows be fixed rotateable spots along with the player's spine being able to bend a certain number of degrees. In order to rotate around, the player has to physically crawl over to view that area. It's easy to see in the animation demos that I referred to, but it's also noticeable on the 12 minute trailer when the Marines are on the rooftop, watch the perspective of the player's weapon and how it moves in relation to the arms. Very cool indeed, because I know balancing prone has always been a problem with BF. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 09:15, 30 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiplayer Teaser ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there is a MP teaser up on www.origin.com, looks like they have gone and screwed the m4 up, (removed front site) [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:22, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't get a good enough look at the gas block to tell. Anywho... I spotted the M16A4, a Mk 46/M249, M9 pistol, the PKM Pencheng, SVD, Mk 11/SR-25 (Not a M110, no full URX rail), AKS-74, and the Grach pistol. All but the SVD and Grach are viewable in the trailer, the AKS-74, SVD, and Grach are visible in the corner where it lists the kills. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:36, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-battlefield-3/714884 pause at 0:19 for the M4, [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:42, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The AKS-74U screenshot shows what appears to be an enemy carrying two [[RPG-7]] launchers. Can't tell if they have optics or straight iron sights. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 14:56, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who put the Mk 11 as the 9A-91? Travesty, stoked that the Mk 11 is in though. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:30, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This photo was posted on battlefields facebook page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that while the US gets an M-4A1 with and without optics, the Russians/PLR get an AK-74M.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:54, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might've just been the loadouts they had for E3, doesn't necessarily confirm faction specific weaponry. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:00, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that PSO-1 or the same unidentified sight from Medal of Honor? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They modelled receiver lid locking knob wrongly. Should be like [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/708/i-711.jpg this]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physical Warfare Pack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New weapons, folks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.totalgamingnetwork.com/content.php?4305-Battlefield-3-Limited-Edition-Physical-Warfare-Pack-Available-for-Preorder-in-UK Battlefield 3 Limited Edition: Physical Warfare Pack Available for Preorder in UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time for article update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:08, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I see they're calling it the DAO-12 again. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:14, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Type 88 (and it seems the Bipod is an attachment), &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; lol, with Flechette ammo, aaaaaaaand... a Flash Suppressor for the &amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle&amp;quot;!!!! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:44, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle?&amp;quot; So we're set in California? Watch out, the bad guys have high-capacity 15-round magazines! [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:56, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isn't the SKS 10 rounds though? I never really liked the look of the SKS, but I've seen a lot of people on this site post about wanting it in a game for once, so it'll make all them happy :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:37, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm just talking generally; you know, scary handguns with high-capacity magazines and laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings and gangland bayonet charges. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:45, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Haha, yeah, I'm from Canada, and while we don't actually have as strict laws as, say, California, what we have is lots of paperwork and time spent training for licenses, etc. Making them harder to get and needing more knowledge about them is way better than just banning them. I never understood that, oooo, a bayonet mount, oh no! A pistol grip? They'll kill us so much more efficiently now! Criminals use illegally bought weapons that aren't registered. And that guy that comes home to find his wife is cheating on him? He's so mad he'll kill both of them, and they think he won't just get a knife or something? I'm not supporting killing people, but people would still do it even if all the firearms on Earth went away. We were pretty damn good at it for the thousands of years before we invented them... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:36, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Agreed :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:26, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still no update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:16, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings' - I lol'd --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:11, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why in the hell would they make the SKS a 'Sniper Rifle'? I mean calling the Dragunov a true sniper rifle is pretty much... wrong, I'm okay with it though, but an SKS? &lt;br /&gt;
I'll admit I'm not very experienced with the SKS myself, maybe it's a tack driver in disguise, but from what I've heard it's just a little more accurate than your standard AK47 and that's not saying much.... --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:56, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well there are only going to be semi-auto sniper rifles, so really, there are only DMRs anyway. It's not like it's a sniper class, it's a recon class, so that's not missnamed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:59, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Source? There's no way they'd make all the sniper rifles semi-automatic. We've only seen semi-automatics, yes, but there's no confirmation that they'll -all- be semi-automatic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:09, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I got out of the Recon description here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/08/battlefield-3-at-e3-roundup.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-auto and C4. That could just mean default, and you still get bolt-actions and the mortar later, but I really think they mean they removed both of those, to balance the issues with those two things in BC2. Everyone uses Recon, everyone hides with a one hit kill sniper rifle, and everyone calls in their magic mortars from anywhere onto anything. It looks like they're trying to make the Recon kit more of a DMR kit than a true sniper, which is probably better, it fits the squad play better as a DMR and a support gunner do the same job, one with high amounts of precision, the other with high amounts of ammo. On a different note, I'm pretty sure the M4A1 will be in the engineer kit because it has a flashlight and will be the counterpart to the AKS-74U, like the M16A4 and AK-74M. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:36, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: They meant at the E3 demo, the Recon class has a semi-automatic sniper rifle. At the E3 Demo. Hence the &amp;quot;E3 Roundup&amp;quot; title, it's not dismissing anything, just saying what they saw at E3. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 21:47, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:12, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249 SAW is actually Mk. 46 Mod 0? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By looking at the handgurads, I noticed that they are sticking out like the Mk. 46 Mod 0's handguards instead of the flat M249 SAW's heatshield. Also, because the weapon is fitted with M145 ECLAN scope, this could be the same model as in Medal of Honor, only it is rendered differently or something like that to fit Battlefield 3's engine. So, could be? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:54, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yep, it's for sure the Mk 46. Though, it's all one nacho. Glad with the weapon choices they're going with so far. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 10:34, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Glad to see the M145 MGO, presumably in place of the ACOG. Nice touch. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:13, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yep, there's also some speculation that there'll be multiple types of 4x optics for each weapon, like you could put the Elcan on an M4. But I think it's more likely that each weapon will just have a different model of ACOG-type optic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:27, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's the case, I'm putting the ELCAN on the M16A4, and if there's camo I'm making it green :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Canadian, eh? :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the screenshot is too low to tell if it's an M249 or a Mark 46. The key difference between the two is that the M249 has a magazine well on the side of the receiver for using M16 mags, but the Mark 46 doesn't. You can't really tell if the SAW in this game has a mag well or not. I also want to point out that the SAW in MoH has a magazine well, which would make it an M249. ;) [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:06, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P90 in IGN preview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/117/1172554/battlefield-3-20110606090440594-000.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the magazine looks like its either missing or modeled way to small&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/117/1172554p1.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sorry i dont know how to embed an image [[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:54, 10 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's a clear model error...the magazine is lodged inside the weapon at an angle and the charging handles are floating above the magazine in midair.&lt;br /&gt;
however, the magazine looks like its of appropriate size and its transparent....would be a nice touch if the bullets inside would actually be visible and move.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May perhaps point to an extended magazines type system, though you'd expect the studio to realise that the P90 feeds from the rear so this wouldn't function --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:09, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are Extended Magazines, you can see them in the loadout window in some of the E3 footage on a PKP Pecheneg. But, what the P90 is likely, is just a pre-alpha mess-up. The magazine is there and properly sized, its' just angled downward into the weapon/barrel. It's not married properly to the P90 and is likely just a glitch that will be fixed. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:29, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, pretty cool that things such as extended magazines have made it into BF3 --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:22, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the latest video where the M4A1 had a holo-sight and the gas block was removed. Looks like this will be just another unrealistic game after all. But at least the character pressed the BCRB instead of pulling the charging handle. Damn it, when will a new Rainbow Six game come out?! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:38, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not a big deal. The M4A1 still kills people and looks great. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:47, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I might be a bit annoying to have every game M4 lose its gas block, but it really doesn't matter THAT much, and it makes the scope view clearer. To say that it will be &amp;quot;just another unrealistic game&amp;quot; because of that is silly, just pretend it has one of those super mini gas blocks, you wouldn't even be able to see it anyway. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:57, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The problem is that I don't want to have a clear view because soldiers do not have clear view ALL the time. And there is a nice little thing called &amp;quot;flat-top riser&amp;quot;. One might wonder why was it invented.... - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 17:07, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But they're ugly and no one uses them. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:45, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if removing gas block was optional and made gun bolt-action. Talk about killing with skill :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bolt-action sniper rifles will be usable without scopes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Continuously updated) This video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwT6x7zEQ8c) shows on the kill-feed that the SVD makes a return for Battlefield 3 at 2:20. At 3:48 you see an enemy in the engineer class holding what appears to be an RPG-7 at 3:48. The kill-feed shows at 4:06 a MP-443 pistol. Clear look at an RPG-7 with on the back of an enemy soldier with the rocket (quite dangerously) inserted at 6:03 and again at 7:23. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 16:32, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Team Specific Weapons? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the AKS-74U pictures it looks scarily like that's a US Marine using it on Spetsnaz. As far as I know there'll be unlockables and selectable weapons, but does anyone know if these are team specific or not? I'm personally pretty worried we're going to have a bunch of marines in state of the art gear running around with AK rifles because a bunch of bars say they're the best, or PLR using M4s and 249's, that's as bad, if not worse. --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 17:26, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's only in MP, it's the same as Bad Company 2, I never liked being restricted to team weapons im MP. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The player could've picked the weapon up... We don't know for sure about faction specific loadouts. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 23:54, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally liked the faction specific loadouts in BF2, it was realistic. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:40, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:True, to be honest I'd be happy either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:49, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope they bring back faction specific weapons from Battlefield 2. Medal of Honor made it right at first but then you got the opposing faction's guns and faction-specificness pretty much lost its purpose :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But in BF2 if you killed a enemy you can pick up his &amp;quot;kit&amp;quot; and use his weapons... - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:08, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, first you had to kill an enemy, then you could pick his stuff (kit). But for Battlefield 3 it should be weapon (more realistic than insta-crossdressing xD ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your right, lol. XD - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:25, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually in BC2 your character model never changed when you swaped kits, you could have a medic carrying a sniper rifle, or a ghillie guy with an RPG-7. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah right, I forgot. :\&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lol, you forgot about rocket launcher-wielding snipers ;) Hey, we should put a pic of that under the rocket section or something, you know, just for kicks. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:05, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::lol yeah. The reason I don't remember is because I only played with bots, I only had Dial-up back then. u_u - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:34, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope its not side specific, I always hated that considering how two weapons from the same class where completely different and handled different. Most people would end up using unlocked guns that you can use on either side. If you want a game thats realistic as possible, play Operation Flashpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a fan of Battlefield 2, which featured faction specific weapons, I'm offended someone is saying me to play another game. I might as well say: If you want a game thats unrealistic as possible, play Call of Duty. By the way, in Medal of Honor opposing factions' weapons had identical stats, so that wouldn't be a problem for Battlefield 3 (probably). Also, sign your posts (paragraphs?) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well since OpFor is using a AK-74M and AKS-74U which is some-what comparable to the M16A4 and M4A1, I say the game is gonna be fairly balanced. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: If they use weapon balance from MoH then yes. Because in BF2 M16A2 and M4A1 kinda sucked (better use G36E and SCAR-L unlocks, respectively). However AK-101 and AKS-74U were ''nice'' (damage)! Check their stats here: [http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison BF2 Weapons Comparison] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^^But those games kinda sucked (at least Dragon Rising, Red River looks good). :\ Whatever, I personally like faction specific weapons for my reasons above. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:27, 22 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be honest, Dragon Rising didn't suck, it was just buggy and laggy (which can be said about pretty much every other shooter, at least as start) and didn't have weapon customization (which can be said about Battlefield 2). In my opinion it is Red River which sucked, basically being Co-op CoD:MW with Visible Walls of Block being replaced by Invisible Walls of Doom and auto regeneration being replaced by manual healing. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Meh, that's why I said ''kinda'' sucky, lol I heard AAII is much worst, as its severely buggy and lacks weapon animations and others. P.S. I prefer manual healing over mutant regenerating health any day, the only place 3 second regenerating health belongs is a Wolverine game. :\  - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::To be honest, manual healing in Red River isn't ''that'' much different from auto regeneration: hold &amp;quot;use&amp;quot; key while not getting hit and several seconds later you are good to go. Whether Dragon Rising had an actual Medic class just like Battlefield :) Oh, and it's kinda hard to make complex game without ''a lot'' of technical problems and unfinished things, yes ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if you want actual realism at this point, you go ArmA 2, not Operation Flashpoint: We-screwed-over-an-already-great-franchise-by-making-a-game-with-casual-gamers-in-mind[[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 03:06, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want actual realism at this point, you go to Army. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh, But ArmA II had NO weapon animations, that's kinda a big &amp;quot;unfinished thing&amp;quot; when you publish the game! And you Mr. Masterius, your obnoxious, why don't ''you'' go join the Army. We're talking about wanting realistic combat games not what peoples career decisions should be. -_-  [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:04, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Wolf, one thing you should realise: until Virtual Reality is created and gone into mass production, games will never, NEVER be trully realistic. Holding gun in your hands =\= Mouse+Keyboard. Also, mine is not obnoxious, mine is very nice and tidy :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:36, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::::And what's so wrong with wanting realism in &amp;quot;Mouse+Keyboard&amp;quot; games? Also I have handled, extensively trained, and fired many REAL firearms, so I'm not just some armchair-commando or a mall-ninja. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:18, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eventually FPSs will be the player wearing a mocap suit with a mocap gun, in a mocap room with a floor that moves (like a treadmill) so you can run places. And you will be forced to reload the weapon properly etc. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The first steps are made :D [http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/xio-ultimate-fps-virtual-reality-gaming-exoskeleton-prototype-video-21-04-2011/ XIO Gaming VR Simulator Prototype] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:54, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd settle for having a decent field of view, right now. They're actually getting narrower rather than wider as the gun attempts to colonise roughly a quarter of the screen. Kinda sad when the guy in ''Doom'' held his pistol in a more sensible way than the guy in ''Crysis 2'' does; the latter seems to be holding it with the base of his right palm rested against his nose. Sure, we're not all going to own an IMAX globe theatre any time soon to have a full 180 degrees or so of vision, but it gets silly when your FOV is ~30 degrees these days when most of the old shooters did 70-90. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed your post? Maybe we both tried to edit at the same time, because it wasn't there when I did, sorry about that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:34, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol @ me. Should have known someone was going to say that... Should have added &amp;quot;In a Video game&amp;quot;... [[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 08:00, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Right 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:51, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's alright, danke. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:31, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More Stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe. I didn't see anything listed here that we don't have, but they seem to know what they're talking about. (Near the bottom)&lt;br /&gt;
http://enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:17, 4 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett MRAD/98B spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the &amp;quot;Classes Explained&amp;quot; screenshot...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x80/cowboyw54/Bf3render.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:07, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool, I'd never heard of that rifle before, looks like a good addition. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like they call Picatinny Railed M16A4 '''M16A2''' ''again'' *facepalm*. Oh, and that's a weird sniper rifle. Don't they have '''M110''' for that?&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. And yeah, same goes for '''DAO-12''' (Armsel Striker, duh!). But I would prefer '''Armsel Protecta''' (it's more modern after all ;) ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:01, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually they are calling it '''M-16a2'''... nuff said! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 05:14, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it was called &amp;quot;Blarg Rifle&amp;quot; but had correct reloads, I'd be happy. Where did it say they called it an A2 anyway? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:03, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg here] [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 07:50, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, well, it might say &amp;quot;M-16a2&amp;quot;, but it calls the MRAD a &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; Sniper Rifle, so, we'll see. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I think that the &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; is the Mk II Mod 0 (SR-25), and that they just threw the text on there because the Mk II will be the default Recon rifle. &lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I think this 99% confirms that it will be in the game, should it be added to the main page?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:28, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OH Mk.11, I thought it said Mk.2, and I couldn't figure out what the hell that would be. Yeah, we've seen the SR-25 already in that multiplayer footage, and everything in that video was default. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:05, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So MoH had the M110 when it should have had the Mark 11, but BF3 now has the Mark 11 when it should have the M110 (USMC recently dropped the Mark 11 in favor of the M110)? *Facepalm* [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:27, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed. Another thing about MoH is that apparently Mark 14 Mod 0 got finished in 2003 and got shipped to Navy SEALs in 2004[http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=377] thus making it as chronologically incorrect as M110. Devs usually tend to skip the details. Still, the crown of ignorance goes to CoD brand. The latest MW3 seems to have customized AK-47 *Major Facepalm* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:39, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes about in-game ACOG scopes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there seem to be two separate models of ACOG scopes available in the game, according to the screenshots posted in the article. The M4A1 carbine the player character uses in the 'Faultline' trailer is fitted with a camo-painted TA01NSN ACOG(identifiable by the integral iron sights and lack of a fiber-optic strip along the top) while one of the M16A4's shown in first-person view in the article here is equipped with a TA31F ACOG. This is the second FPS game I've seen to do this, the other being ''[[Project Reality]]'' (itself a mod of ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', coincidentally) which has the TA31F and TA31RCO ACOG models available in it. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:44, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...While in the average FPS, you're lucky if the thing called the ACOG looks like anything in Trijicon's product line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:47, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Making the public in general think every scope is called an ACOG :P Also, in terms of 4x sights, theres the M249s ELCAN, and I'm hoping you can put any optic on anything. One of the DICE guys said there's a crazy amount of optics in BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:26, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even in COD: Black Ops (a game that takes place in the 60s mind you) they have a scope called a ACOG, even though it's obviously ''not'' a ACOG *rolls eyes*. Game Devs are becoming fails more and more every year. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Treyarch basically made their own Modern Warfare, with blackjack and hookers. So yeah, forget about proper portray of Cold War. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:41, 13 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Give me the ability to slap the Elcan onto the M240 and I will be happy. Hope what you said about the 'crazy amount of optics' turns out to be true. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:34, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope you're not confusing the ELCAN scope with the similar M145 MGO. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are correct, I did mean the MGO. I know the M145 is different, I just though the Elcan name was interchangeable. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 13:15, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It would be nice to see a broader array of optics customizations in FPS games. ''Project Reality'' has a pretty good variety, but you have to switch out your entire class loadout in order to change this, and most weapons only have 1 or 2 optics available aside from iron sights (the M4A1 has the widest variety; having available EOTech, M68 Aimpoint, Kimber Mepro, &amp;amp; ITL MARS red dots as well as both TA31F &amp;amp; TA31RCO ACOGs as mentioned above). [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, that Project Reality has been mentioned... I hope DICE won't disappoint the CIS players, so that we can kick yer capitalist arses in proper way... j/k lol :P Anyway, here are the articles for those interested: [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/1P29 for AK-74M] and [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/PKP for PKP]. And the [http://www.npzoptics.com/catalog/sights_for_small_arms/ full catalog]. Oh, and it's been suggested on [http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-3/1405448-optics-lots-optics-2.html#post19418223 EA's Forums], so I don't have to do it myself. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:24, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mocap Guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a challenge for everyone; what are the two wire guns standing in for?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2nd Story&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or if it's off the list after a while:&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab1.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab2.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cornershot and a Thompson with M203? :P [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:lolz. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:51, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More seriously, that thing McNab has is definately supposed to be a carbine with an underbarrel accessory, I can't really see what else it could be. The other guy's weapon is a bit more of a mystery; since it doesn't have any kind of projection for a magazine, I'd guess it's something like a Bizon; can't be a P90, these rigs are for capturing hand positions and his would be completely wrong for that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, actually it does have a magazine, I see a curved MP5-style mag just in front of his finger. So, maybe it's an MP5 with some underbarrel device making the front end all chunky, or one of those MP10 things like in GTAIV. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:40, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOL Tommy with M203 :) The one on the right really looks like an M14 EBR to me, the mag, handguard, and barrel, but the other one is weird. It looks like an MP5 pistol grip and mag, with a really bulky front, and a stock that looks familiar, bu I just can't place. :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:09, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://riflestocks.com/store/product2.html ACE side-folding skeleton stock]? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:48, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that's the one! Hmm, is there anything in particular that's on, aftermarket or otherwise? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Quick google gets me mostly AK-pattern weapons. AK, Saiga, Galil, that kind of thing. Couple on MACs, not that it's likely to be one of those. Maybe that's what a MoCap AKS-74U looks like? :s [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'd say that's the best guess so far [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:13, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno, such a stock shape reminds me of [http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:G36.jpg G36E] which was in Battlefield 2 (with railz instead of optics). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not sure about that, you'd have thought if it was G36E the mocap prop would have a rod or something stuck to the end to represent the rest of the barrel like the one McNab has. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Bah, I am not really into guessing the gun by the mocap. Details of it - OK, but generally it's just a mishmash that can be used for anything provided the grip is adequate xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:51, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually the ACE stock is found on the SPAS 15 as well (which was in Bad Company 1, and Battlefield 2 I think) probably the most likely choice. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:48, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope it's that, that was the ONLY weapon that didn't come back in BC2 for some reason. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But it returned in [[Battlefield Play4Free#Franchi SPAS-15|Battlefield Play4Free]] so its appearance in BF3 is possible ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 23:20, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 unlock spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... in a promotional shot from Dice about their Battlelog service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x599/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:02, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was also seen in the EA Pwned video, along with the G3 (mentioned), I forgot to add that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:06, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I hope this Glock 17 actually holds... well... 17 rounds. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:24, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the MP-443 does, so that could work, I'm thinking there's gonna be a Euro faction, with the Glock as the sidearm, and we've also seen the P90. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:17, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now that reminds me... Battlefield 2: Modern Combat (console version of Battlefield 2) had [[ Battlefield 2: Modern Combat#Glock 17 Pistol|Glock 17]] as Euro Sidearm :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:44, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It did? Awesome! I was just guessing, but that basically confirms it :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:54, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here's some leaked gameplay for you guys, skip to 1:44, there's your Glock. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfeOoEDYEt0) Would appear that the sidearms (at least) are not faction specific. Also looks like it holds 18 rounds but I'm assuming this is a '+1' affair. [[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:00, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Melee Animation is good :D Reloading after every bullet isn't :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha Footage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
no doubt some of you have heard there is a closed alpha trial going on, and some of you may have watched the leaked footage online. i dont want to post links to these videos just incase its not aloud.&lt;br /&gt;
but i can tell you, that the G36c, Glock 17, M27 IAR, SV98, MP7 and M1014 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:24, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Closed Alpha? Any news about Closed Beta for MoH: Limited Edition owners? It should be before Open Beta, shouldn't it? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A pretty nice selection of weapons appearing which is good to see, particularly the M27. Now just need someone to spot the L85 and I'll be happy \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:19, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess it, Russian counterpart to M27 is going to be RPK-74M :O And British - L86? ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You may possibly be right, and I hope you are. If it's in there, first person to deliver the information wins a shiny medal from myself :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::looks like US support starts with the M27, and the Russians start with RPK, british forces arent in the game... --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 13:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The existence of other factions hasn't been denied (to my knowledge) but even so I hope either weapon is available --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 15:02, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Germans aren't in the game and there's a G36C. We can't rule anything out. Plus, there's always the possibility of DLC. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 19:31, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::New factions/weapons added via DLC would be grand. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:50, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Yeah, like they did with Euro Forces Pack for Battlefield 2 :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've yanked the images off the page; as with the MW3 stuff, posting images from leaks is not allowed. Wait until they show up in something official. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why does it even matter? We should post everything about everything we know... :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:36, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Same reason we don't allow pirated or leaked movie footage; using that kind of thing reflects badly on the site. We can wait until these weapons are confirmed in official materials (which they will be in due course, I'm sure), we don't need to go using dubious sources. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:39, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, for a sec it slipped my mind that once the game is out we will have everything :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And there are still screencaps from leaked version :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Which ones? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:30, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The ones added by Gran28 - check page history. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:41, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, I thought where he said &amp;quot;Paris gameplay video&amp;quot; he was talking about a gameplay video released at some show in Paris. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:49, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The ones that I added was from a gameplay trailer released by DICE yesterday I think.--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 08:04, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Ah, if that's so, then my bad. Kinda hard to separate official ones from current leaks. Better mention that on the talk page :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:28, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Official MP Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emwEknzmyRo &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
can see a M4 with a Eotech and a Acog, and the front site is in when optics are attached.--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:32, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible return of the NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MgQMoPwGwM&amp;amp;feature=related and around 1:13-14, I thought I saw the pattern found on the straight mags that the 7.62mm NATO variant of the NDM-86 uses.&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Okay at 1:15 at the maximum quality, I could clearly see that magazine is straight.  This is no SVD guys, no SVD. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 18:09, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good spot, wouldn't have noticed that myself. I wonder why they opted for the NDM-86 instead of the SVD? I assume the SVD is harder to get in Sweden meaning the studio had to find an alternative. Is it still labeled as an SVD within the game? --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is, and it was in MoH. You know, I think MoH was like a super pre-Alpha version of this game, there's and MP7 too, and a few others. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:03, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope DICE do a better job on BF3 than they did on MoH, that game was shocking. There's probably some truth in that though :P --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 20:43, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well, MoH multi was made by a small team from DICE in 6-7 months, and ALL of DICE has been working on BF3 for, like, 5 years, I'm not worried ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Fair play to them but you'd have thought issues with the game would have been patched following the game's release. Still, I don't deny that BF3 will be a far better game however I'm sure some of the issues from MoH will poke through. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, we can hope the issues that poke through don't include those godawful skyboxes that MoH had. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:26, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE deliberately sabotaged MoH MP 'cause they were focused on BC2... :( But it is said that MoH 2 is being developed solely by DC. And it is rumored that MoH 2 will have Frostbite 2 Engine :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:50, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would be interesting to see what DC do with the Frostbite 2 engine, I wasn't all that impressed with the single player but taking into account that (as far as I'm aware) MoH was the studio's first game, it was an adequate effort. Was better than the multiplayer at least, in my opinion. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 07:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've always said that if MoH's MP was the same as it SP, then the MP would be awesome, I have it just for the SP :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:35, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just played some more of SP and I have to say I agree, pretty intense stuff. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:38, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just noticed that all of the US weapons are Armalites, and all of the Russian weapons are Kalashnikovs, it's cool. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aside from the 'SVD' which isn't a Kalashnikov design, but we'll forgive you as it is outwardly similar. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but you got the point ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/sniper/sn18/svd_clones.jpg SVD Clones]. The third one is AK modified to SVD. Ain't Russian guns :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do like the fact that each faction has it's own starting weaponry, I always liked that about BF2 (though I didn't play it much) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:25, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can't find the video, but I'll post a link: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7447261.page [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:31, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 22:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sniper Rifles can have iron sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yup. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:04, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmmm. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:56, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to tell because of the screwed up animation in the alpha, but you load a round into the chamber first, then the tube. EDIT: This is a good thing, I made sound like it wasn't :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It fires semi, burst, AND auto, one of those fancy 360 degree fire selects or something :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Alpha Gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the gameplay, I noticed that the front sights are still present when optics are attached, that M16A4 is now burst-fire and that the US LMG is called M249 in-game. Bipod gameplay was shown too. I also spotted the M-416 at 0:55, maybe the M4A1 equivalent of the enemy forces? [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:45, 24 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, yeah, they made it so the front sight is there, but disappears when aiming, the M16 has burst as well as auto (and semi), and the HK416 is an unlock, ONLY the default weapons are faction based, anyone can use unlocks, but the default ones might be usable by anyone later or something though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's still much better than the MW games. Boy, you complain more about games than I do. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:19, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Defaults faction / unlocks not is how BFs 2 and 2142 worked, too. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:08, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not complaining, I actually like the front sight disappearing system, if it's not there the gun wouldn't work, but if it was, then having an RDS would give you a better field of view. The M16's fire modes aren't too bad, as long as the weapons have the right ammo count, reload properly, and have +1 I'm happy. Things like the player loading it fancy or whatever are okay. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M320 Standalone confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
This. Search &amp;quot;BF3 Grenade Launcher&amp;quot;, and the vid has a G3 with an ACOG too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG 550 pretty much confirmed by Demize ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/30377608852017152 [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swiss weapon of choice 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Few Weapon Vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoU7uBNvP0&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LILgS-M2xo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's most everything in action, and with a few attachments. I love how the description for the M145 mentions the Canadian Army! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking good so far, spotted some people on my Steam friends list playing the alpha. So jealous. :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:43, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm looking very forward to this game. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Video Confirms new weapons for the game, as available in alpha build. In the first video we see an MP-7 PDW at 1:14, M1911 pistol at 1:57, RPK light machinegun on killfeed at 3:21, M27 IAR in killfeed at 6:12, M1014 shotgun at 7:34, G3 battlerifle on killfeed at 8:29, G36c assault rifle at 12:15, M320 grenade launcher on killfeed at 13:16. In the 2nd video we see RPK selection and model at 6:07 (usage following). Someone please update main page accordingly.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 15:32, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good of you to find everything, but leaked stuff isn't going on the main page :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:25, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: awww =(, thanks though.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 17:39, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sigh, The M145 uses the M4 reticle over the M249/240 reticle :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:47, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's the reticle my (standard version) ELCAN replica has on my airsoft C7A2, do you mean the M145 version is supposed to have a different one? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:40, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[http://www.dsarms.com/images/ELCM145M4W.gif Elcan M145 Optical Sight for M4 and M249/M240]. Remember people, this is just leaked Alpha and DICE will ''probably'' make changes to the game to make it right... Oh, and RPK :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh I see. And what do you mean, oh and the RPK? What's wrong with it? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:07, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Has the wrong bipod at the moment, doesn't look like the barrel is long enough to be an RPK either --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:31, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Well... since it has both synthetic furniture and curved magazine, it is [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg15/rpkm.jpg RPKM] (ignore the magazine color). However in-game description mentions that it uses 5.45x39 ammo, which is used in [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg16/rpk74_02.jpg RPK-74M] that is actually used by Russian Forces. So the point is, DICE should change the magazine model and rename the weapon to '''RPK-74M''' for Russians. That Militia can use whatever they want. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I didn't know that, so the curvature of the magazine in an AK/RPK-style weapon can be used to identify the caliber? DICE have clearly given alpha invites to the wrong people, should have gone to the inhabitants of IMFDB. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: :D And yeah. The curve gradation for Kalashnikovs' magazines goes as follows: 5.56 &amp;lt; 5.45 &amp;lt; 7.62, with 7.62 curve being particularly distinguishable ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::You learn something new everyday, now I can complain that the BF3 RPK is incorrect &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:33, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I sent Demize a tweet (I made a Twitter accout JUST to send him stuff) that the RPK should be either the RPKM or RPK-74M (as I can't see the mags well enough), and also sent him another one saying the G3 should be the G3A3 :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::That is dedication to informing the developer their game is wrong, well played. I also sent him a tweet concerning the M145's reticle. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:30, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Very good :D Two problems I've noticed about '''SVD''': First, as already been noticed, is that in-game model of magazine is straight NATO one instead of curved Russian one; second, is that in-game '''PKS-07''' is using optical PSO-1 based reticle instead of its own magnified reflex reticle like this one: [http://www.newphillysports.com/milsurp/pks07reticle.jpg]. And here information about it: [http://www.gunscollecting.com/english/scopes/pks-07-collimating-sight/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:24, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Just recieved an invite to the alpha, I am so stoked to try this game out \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:44, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:56, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 1911 spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just watched a video and the 1911 is back. This game's version appears to be the MEU model. I can tell from the slide, sights, and hammer. It appears to be the old model with the Springfield Armory slide. [[User:ShootingLiberal|ShootingLiberal]] 23:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't see the grips, but it appears to be a stock M1911 with a commander-style hammer (the round one, not the MEU one), a silver 3-hole trigger, and a silver barrel. Oh, after Googleing I found that that IS the original version of the MEU :/ http://www.justpistols.co.uk/meu_001.jpg That's an airsoft gun, but it's EXACTLY the one from BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:35, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, the MEU Pistol is currently designated [http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/24/m45-close-quarters-combat-pistol/ M45] Pistol ;) So maybe in-game it is some kind of customized M1911 Pistol? :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just got the invite for the Operation Metro Alpha and Will post info here if I can.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 20:53, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Awesome, that's two of us now :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So my impressions of the alpha so far are largely positive, not the biggest fan of the map however. Too many narrow corridors that you have to enter to advance, meaning that the defending team can plonk a SAW there and wipe you out as you enter the meat grinder. The weapons feel nice: Plenty of recoil meaning that burst firing is essential. Definitely an improvement gameplay-wise compared to BC2, which wasn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination. Looking forward to the beta now! \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Improvement compared to BC2, is obviously. The question is, improvement compared to BF2! :O--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can't really comment on whether it's better than BF2 as I haven't really spent much time on it (5 mins max) but it is a fairly solid FPS in it's own right. One thing that has bothered me thus far is 3D spotting, do not like it at all though, it should be changed for minimap spotting. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ah, in that case, if you still have BF2, I would recommend you download and install [http://www.realitymod.com/ Project Reality] mod, which focuses on realistic armed forces. There are people who have BF2 solely for it. And, it has British Army! :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yeah and the Canadian Army :D I'll be getting BF2/RM soon. Keep in mind this is one of the smallest map and it's meant to be more infantry focused, they'll be much bigger ones with more vehicles ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:10, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yup :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 29 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I hope that with more vehicles comes more teammates actually willing to take them out. No one playing engineer was even trying, just using their launchers on each other. Meant to ask if anyone still played BF2 as I was gonna get it in anticipation for 3, should organise some gamz. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:57, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I'm trying to get BF2 again, loved that game, can't wait to convert it to PR. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:04, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Needs a bit of polish but what I played of the alpha was a lot of fun, roll on October --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:32, 1 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Anyone have any questions about it? I'd be happy to answer them (as best I can) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:27, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Alpha weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/new-battlelog-screenshots-show-weapons-awards/battlelog-weapon-list/    - [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope, they will make new icons for AR-15 guns. These no-sights ones are just weird. Also, what I've said in &amp;quot;A Few Weapon Vids&amp;quot; --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:21, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The in-game ones have carry handles but I'm sure you knew this, I can live with a few slightly inaccurate icons on the Battlelog though. The M27 IAR had no front sight post for some reason in-game, made the Eotech pretty much essential. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:19, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doesn't it have flip-up sights? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:43, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It does, yes, but the front sight is missing the front sight post. As in, the sights are there, but the post is not. Made aiming quite tricky as you can imagine. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:34, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I'm assuming that's been fixed by now [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:15, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I hope so, was a nightmare. Still, barely used the RPK/IAR once the SAW was unlocked --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:44, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Cause the SAW's a real support weapon ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::^ This, though the fact that you can change the RPK and IAR to semi-auto was a nice feature --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:30, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Does IAR have better accuracy and SAW better firepower or SAW has ''both''? Because if it is the second one, IAR seems kinda... useless. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:35, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::For sure, the IAR/RPK are definitely more accurate than the SAW, the SAW is quite difficult to use at range without deploying the bipod whereas the other two don't have as much recoil. I assume the lighter support weapons are there for the more mobile, front-line support guy. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure this legit as another article is saying they're from OXM so should they be moved to the page and not discussion ? [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== why aren't confirmed weapons named? ==&lt;br /&gt;
such as the g3 ,m416 ,m27 iar and many more????&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can't put leaked stuff on the page, you'd know this if you read the rest of the discussion --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:21, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah thats why all the weapons used in the alpha were named in an official blog and yet there still not up here , so dont tell me i need to read the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do forgive me. Link to this blog? If it's legit you're free to edit the page if you wish. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:12, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I second the link request. Also, sign you posts. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:38, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(TOSSED)  RE-posting.  You guys should simply look up a bit next time. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that's not official blog. It's fanblog that also [http://bf3blog.com/battlefield-3-weapons/ makes assumptions] and [http://bf3blog.com/2011/07/battlefield-3-50-leaked-alpha-screenshots/ postes leaked stuff]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:55, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like I'm tossing that out the window. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:20, 4 August 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::An image which was leaked from the alpha, users of which were under a non-disclosure agreement which means we could get in trouble if we post it up here. Until we get an absolutely official list of weapons (most likely from future trailers and the public beta) the page will stay the same. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:27, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Setups ==&lt;br /&gt;
So what kinda weapons and setups do you guys think you're gonna use?&lt;br /&gt;
*Medic - G3 (or other BR) with a scope&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer - M1014 (or other shotty)&lt;br /&gt;
*Support - M249 (or other belt fed) with a bipod&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon - MP7 (or other SMG/PDW) with a suppressor&lt;br /&gt;
*Sidearm - M1911&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll probably play support mainly, it's what I spent 80% of the alpha doing and it's where I had the most fun. M240 with bipod, optic and flash suppressor will be my class of choice. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:29, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game''&lt;br /&gt;
:^ This --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:40, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PWNED #7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXaFw7aC9GE&lt;br /&gt;
A couple things I missed the first time I saw it, there's the M4, M1911, and G17, but also a Desert Eagle and MP5SD2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:17, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Desert Eagle? [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigNo NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What's up with the Desert Eagle? It's a perfectly good combat pistol *trollface*. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:11, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:22, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Developers really need to stop putting large caliber handguns and revolvers in supposedly 'realistic' games, it just feels stupid. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:38, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-oinyjsk0 I know what you're thinking. &amp;quot;Did he fire six shots or only five?&amp;quot; Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: &amp;quot;Do I feel lucky?&amp;quot; Well, do ya, punk?]'' --''Harold Francis &amp;quot;Dirty Harry&amp;quot; Callahan''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/revolver/1287756474.jpg .357 Magnum Colt Whitetailer], camper's wet dream :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:45, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their rack of guns at 3:06 (presumably airsoft for modelling purposes) contains an M14 and a FAMAS, might be 2 more to expect in the full game. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:00, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::M1911 + M14 = Old School Pack 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, I only thought to rewatch the range part, totally missed the FAMAS and M14 lol, good catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:15, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pre-order Spectact kits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/2/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila][http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/1/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some images of the exclusive Spectact kits you get via pre-order, you'll also notice that the Russian assault class soldier is holding an AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Guess American Assault class gets XM8. Both weapons lost their respective trials. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:20, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise its just art , and probably wont be ingame --[[User:LukeWilliams010|LukeWilliams010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, will wait for confirmation regarding these weapons. Maybe it's just false alarm (and Desert Eagle too). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nah, the AEK will most likely be in, and the AK-74M will go to the PLR faction. There's nothing official, but there's the AEK (RU) and 74M(PLR), SKS as a sniper (PLR), T-72 tanks (PLR), and MP lines recorded in English, Russian and Farsi, that's confermation enough. I've seen no evidence of the XM8, but who knows, they did say there's 10 times the unlocks as BC2... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:30, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Russian Forces clearly used AK-74M on Operation Metro map. The same is expected from final release. As for PLR, there are only silhouettes, and as such it's unclear which AK is used. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The AEK will probably be a universal unlock for all factions if it is indeed in the final game (which I believe it will be, doubt they'd use a weapon in artwork and not include it in-game) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:01, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There most likely will be no AEK in final game. Those renders showing specact skins are pretty dated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fair enough, I didn't know that. Not too fussed either way, not a big fan of the weapon. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 16:09, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please no XM8, at least not in the SP. If it's an MP only gun, I could care less whether it's in or not, though. I'm buying this for the SP, which I'm hoping will be at least semi-realistic. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:18, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I kinda doubt they will put in the XM8, I'd rather see a full-size G36. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:25, 15 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M16A3==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize99 tweeted that the M16A4 has been renamed to A3. Though we don't know if it still has all three modes, I'm thinking it doesn't. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:49, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm. Full Auto M16A4 seems more plausible to me than Picatinny Railed M16A3. Maybe call it M16A5? xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:57, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, the A3 is actually an A4 with full auto, I thought it was an A2-style for a long time, but looks it up, its hard to find good descriptions, but the A3 and A4 are the same except burst/auto. No one on this site gets that because this site calls every A3-style an A4 with an A2 lower. Why? Because that's what armourers built them with, since they don't have A3s. In games the weapon is whatever it's meant to be because it's not &amp;quot;built&amp;quot; on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:09, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, now that's funny. Turns out to be true[http://www.armyproperty.com/Equipment-Info/M16A3-A4.htm][http://world.guns.ru/assault/usa/m16-m16a1-m16a2-m16a3-e.html]. Silly 'mericans couldn't get hold of manual burst firing, Military Command had to enforce it for them :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:21, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hey, those are the two sites I found! I just couldn't find them again :P Anyway, look at the description on the first site, it's worded very old, saying things like identical to A2, but also same as A4. That's actually the most info I've seen on an A3 in one place, adding to the confusion, since there isn't good info around. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:16, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, Alex is wrong and so are the two websites Masterius linked to. The M16A3 is a full auto A2 (only used by SEALs and Seabees in very limited numbers), NOT a full auto A4. IMFDB policy is to identify a weapon visually, not by what the game calls it. In terms of A3 vs A4, the M16 in this game is intended to be an A4, so that's what it should be called. At least for the moment anyway. If it turns out the devs decide to axe the burst mode, we can classify it a C7A1, but until we know more, it should stay listed as an A4. I'm changing it back. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:11, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Uhm, Modern Firearms is respectable source. If you are claiming that it is not that means you have a better one? And the weapon can't be C7A1 since C7A1 is [http://world.guns.ru/assault/can/diemaco-c7a1-c7a2-c-e.html Model C7FT] (Railed Model 715 itself) and Full Auto M16A4 is [http://www.colt.com/mil/M16_2.asp Model 901] (Full Auto Railed Model 705 itself). And there are differences between 705 and 715[http://www.biggerhammer.net/ar15/variants/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now I want to know whether Demize99 tweeted about RPK and SVD... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The first A3s had A2 uppers, but were later (and still are) issued with railed uppers, that's where people get confused. A3 = Rail. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I do have a better source. It's called Defense Industry Daily [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m-16-rifle-purchases-04517/]. Additionally, if you take a look at the M16A2 section of the [[M16 rifle series]] page, it says the exact same thing. I also never said MF ''wasn't'' a respectable source, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's wrong in this case. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:25, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Other MIL-STD-1913 rails can be found on the front grips '''et. al.''' of the '''A3s''' and A4s, where they mount useful items like flashlights, laser pointers, grip pods, et. al.''&lt;br /&gt;
:There too. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:59, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Besides, why does it feature ''Wikipedia'' in '''Additional Readings'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Front grip&amp;quot; as in around the barrel, like a Knight's Armament M5 RAS. It has Wikipedia as an additional read because DID's article doesn't feature the M16 rifle's entire life story; Wikipedia does. In fact, why don't you take a look at Wikipedia where it states that the A3 is a full auto A2 and uses DID's article to verify it? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:07, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are a number of different rifles designated as the M16A3 by the US military. The first is what Wikipedia refers to, the Colt Model 646 which is also known as the M16A2E3, which was introduced in small numbers at the same time as the M16A2 and is an A2 with an A1 lower and was only used by the Navy and Coast Guard. Then you have the flat-top Colt Model 901 which was introduced at the same time as the M16A4 (in 1994 I think) which is basically an M16A4 with full auto rather than burst. The following is what the US army website says about the A3 and A4: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;The M-16A3 is identical to the M-16A2 but has a removable carrying handle that is mounted on a Picatinny Rail (for better mounting of optics) and is without burst control. The M-16A4 is identical to the M-16A2 except for the removable carrying handle and Picatinny Rail.&amp;quot; I would imagine that for modularity purposes the A3 in this game is the current version (Model 901).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:22, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, thanks, that really clears it up, so we could call the full auto A2 the M16A2E3, and the full auto A4 the M16A3, that makes sure they have different names, right? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Interesting, found [http://compass.seacadets.org/pdf/nrtc/cb1/14234_ch3.pdf information about M16A1 and M16A2E3] on [http://www.seacadets.org/ U.S. Naval Sea Cadet Corps website]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:31, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::That PDF is actually wrong, as it states that the M16A2E3 is burst fire rather than full auto. Here is the [http://www.scribd.com/doc/29272650/MIL-R-71135-Rifle-5-56MM-M16A2E3-1992 US Army Military Specification] for the M16A2E3 from 1992 (go to page 4, and look at the fire selector section). Although calling the earlier rifle the M16A2E3 takes away the confusion, it can still correctly be called the M16A3 as it was reclassified as this, kind of like how the M16A2 was originally the M16A1E1. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 06:11, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::True, I guess someone just got lazy and didn't give the flat top version a new name, so the 646 and 901 are BOTH A3s. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:47, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Editors probably made a mistake in ''that'' part because everywhere ''else'' it says automatic fire (right from the beginning). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:19, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, and after more searching: [http://www.military-today.com/firearms/m16.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:21, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I said, the very first A3s had A2 uppers, and after that they had rails. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:17, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Put it this way, the only times it says something about not having a top rail, it doesn't. What I mean is, it always says something really vague like &amp;quot;full auto version of the A2&amp;quot;, never mentioning specifics. I have not yet read somewhere that says that the A3 has a fixed carry handle, but have seen plenty that say the opposite. The problem was someone decided a long time ago that this site was for guns that are in movies only, not a gun wiki, so since the A3 is not in any civvie hands, and therefore not in any movies, it shouldn't be mentioned. All &amp;quot;A3&amp;quot;s in movies are A4s with A2 lowers, that is what the armourer used. However with the addition of newer weapons, and therefore newer entries, and the addition of games, where the guns don't really exist and therefore ARE anything, things are being added that never were before. Correct me if I'm wrong but the Mk.18 is only a military weapon, right? That means that, say, in the first Transformers movie Josh Duhamel's Mk.18 wouldn't have been a real Mk.18, but some Civvie M4 with a short barrel and such, made to look exactly the same as one. But that doesn't make it a Mk.18, however it IS listed as such. I may be wrong and it might actually be a Mk.18, but then Canadian C7-series is a better example: NO civvies have them. Period. But it still has an entry, as it is in Reality Mod, among a few others. Now we see the problem with not having an M16A3 entry: there might not be any in civvie hands, but there are some in games, like BF3, but COD4 singleplayer comes to mind as well, and I'm sure there are others. Hmm, I guess what this comes down to is we need an M16A3 listing on the M16 page. All of them should be listed, even if the only info is the name, a sentence about the weapon, and mention that it has never been in anything, otherwise we get stuff like everyone on the site getting false info about a particular weapon, and this happens. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That ''is'' specific. &amp;quot;Full auto version of the A2&amp;quot; means it's externally identical to the A2, but has fully automatic. I don't see how that's vague. If you've got a credible source saying A3s are &amp;quot;now issued&amp;quot; with flat top uppers, I'd like to see it. But if you look at the pattern of M16 rifle development, it's very likely that such a modification would bear a designation other than A3 (the only two exceptions to this in the platform's history were the Air Force's 11.5&amp;quot; barreled XM177s and when the Army dropped the Model 777 M4 for the Model 920 M4. Josh Duhamal used an M933 in Transformers, not a Mark 18. Mark 18-type carbines with 10.3&amp;quot; or 10.5&amp;quot; barrels can be had by anyone with proper licensing. But the reason we have Mark 18 mock-ups in movies listed as Mark 18s is because, like I already pointed out, it's IMFDB policy to identify the weapon on a visual basis. If it ''looks'' like a Mark 18, we ''call it'' a Mark 18 unless some other way of concretely identifying the weapon (such as an armorer ID) comes along. Your argument about civilian acquisition is a dead end since armorers like MPM are civilians, yet have fully automatic M4s, AK-47s, M60s, and so on in their possession. The only games I've played with full auto M16A4s are CoD4 and MoH, the pages for both of which identify the rifle as an M16''A4''. If you want an A3 category added, either take a look at the [[Talk:M16_rifle_series#Do_well_really_need_to_have_an_.22A2.22_and_.22A3.22_category.3F|M16 rifle talk page to see why it was deleted]] (where MPM himself states that the M16A3 has the same upper receiver as the A2) or come to the forum and state your case as to why said category should be reinstated. But as per IMFDB policy, the M16 on this page should be classified as an A4. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:14, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As soon as my problems with registration are solved, I'll bring this discussion to the light. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Bah. Is there any other way to contact forum administration other than through the forum? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Leave a message on [[User:MT2008|MT2008's]] talk page about it. He's an administrator on the forum. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:01, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Both M16s ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirms multiple M16s! I'm expecting the A3 and A4 obviously [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:05, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, that's pretty cool. =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:32, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's something I would like to take a look at in Beta :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He also confirmed not everything's in the Beta, but hopefully these two will be. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:22, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see very little point in including 2 M16 models, just takes up space that could be filled with something new :\ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The automatic one will probably be the starting weapon to balance it against another starting weapon, and burst fire one will probably be for everyone to use as an unlock. You see, so that to please everyone :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I gueessssss, suppose they don't have to remodel it or anything either, just change the weapon's code/animations. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:58, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think the A4 should be the starter and the A3 should be the unlock, makes much more sense to me. The starter ARs in COD4 were the M16A4 and AK-47 and that was just fine. Or maybe you can modify a base M16 into other variants. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:09, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I guessed it right: Demize has confirmed that M16A3 will be the default US assault rifle for the Assault kit[http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/102776416898265088] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:00, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gamescom trailers and official gameplay vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
We've got official footage for 2 weapons, one already known (MP-443), and one all-new (SCAR-H CQC with Grippod and Aimpoint optic).  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE .  In the Co-Op live gameplay from the devs, one of them picks up an unknown pump action shotgun with a 4+1 capacity.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:06, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice! Wonder if SCAR-L in? Oh, and they give civilian shotguns to military again! *shakes head* Already noticed that with M1014 before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isnt 2 m16 models , where do you get your info lol there is one the m16a3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== INCOMING ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/images/news3/fact_sheet2.jpg *kaboom*]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EA just released the fact sheet with all the weapons/attachments/specs listed, there's the weapon page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT:[http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=165281 and here's your proof] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:22, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that M39 the Finnish Mosin-Nagant? Or is there another battle rifle that uses the M39 designation?  Also, that list is missing the Groza bullpup AR that one dev caught one of the testers reloading.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:42, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 refers to the M14 variant used by the Marines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M39_Enhanced_Marksman_Rifle (this)]. And the Groza bullpup was actually the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-91 A-91] (not the 9A-91 from BC2... Russian weapon designations are confusing)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:56, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good find, kinda wish I hadn't looked at it though XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:11, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: AHAHAHAHA, &amp;quot;SCAR H CQB&amp;quot; made my day. But at least they wrote ACOG, not ACOG Sight, nor ACOG Scope. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:30, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That is what FN Herstal calls it [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=184&amp;amp;backPID=182&amp;amp;productID=10&amp;amp;pid_product=232&amp;amp;pidList=182&amp;amp;categorySelector=1&amp;amp;detail] though does it really belong in the carbines section? I would have thought it still belonged with the battle rifles. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:38, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::They call it CQC, C for Combat not B for Battle. But calling it CQB is still more correct than calling it simply SCAR-H, like in Modern Warfail 2, because that usually refers to SCAR-H STD, the one w/ the normal length barrel. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:47, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I see, fair enough. As you said though, at least they were slightly closer than some games. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:51, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, this does nothing to allay my fears about it being a generic AMURIKA V EVUL ARABS AND KOMMIES shooter. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:37, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, looks like y'all missed them calling it the M93R, rather than just the 93R like it should be. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:39, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A few things; first, it looks like this list is a little dated, as Demize confirmed both M16s, but even though details might have changed, I bet this is a 100% list. Second, remember this doesn't include stuff like the M320 (as it's a Gadget in terms of game), and mounted weapons. Third, I'm assuming the M39 (M14) will be semi only, as only it and the SKS are in the Battle Rifle section, with the G3 moved to Assault Rifles. Similarly, I'm betting the Glock 18 and Beretta 93R will be auto and burst only, otherwise the Glock 17 and M9 would be pretty useless. Fourth, notice that there is a P90 AND a P90TR. I'm thinking if you attach an RDS to the P90TR, it becomes the standard one, like COD4's MP5SD. Lastly, what's a T44 pistol? I did a quick search and all I got was this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/T44.jpg Oh, also, I'm totally using the M82 with irons, just for kicks :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm thinking the &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; might be the sidearm for Iranian forces, like the KH2002 will be their assault rifle. I don't know what it could be referring to, though; as far as I know, Iran uses P226 copies as their standard sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This looks ''really'' suspicious to me. No G36E (as was expected from BF2 (L85 too)), no SG 550 (as was confirmed by Demize), no multiple M16 (wasn't that said by Demize?), &amp;quot;Battle Rifles&amp;quot; actually being Marksman Rifle (M39) and Semi-Automatic Carbine (SKS), several weapons being ported from BC2 (AEK-971, A-91, PP-2000, Saiga-20K, MP-412) instead of BF2 (Bizon or Vityaz, Saiga-12K) for no reason; Beretta 93R and Glock 18 are actually law enforcement automatic pistols and will overshadow regular pistols... And T44? WW2 prototype gun being put in pistols?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; sheet was putted on [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/ official Battlefield Blog], I would have believed it. As of now I take it with a grain of salt. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:38, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The sheet lists an SG553 in the carbines section. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:14, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be like someone saying: &amp;quot;We want M4 in BC2!&amp;quot; and someone responded: &amp;quot;There is M16 there&amp;quot;. One weapon is assault rifle and other is carbine. They shouldn't cancel each other. Really. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, how exactly do you think the &amp;quot;straight pull bolt&amp;quot; under the weapon accessories could work? Either it will be some bullshit about somehow putting a straight pull bolt on bolt actions to increase ROF which will annoy the hell out of me, or I suppose it could be putting a straight pull bolt on assault/battle rifles to increase accuracy and turn them into sort of sniper rifles. Either way, I don't like it.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:32, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T44 is what they are calling the [[Taurus Model 44]] revolver.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:35, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, so the revolver unlocks are Russian .357 Magnum and Brazilian .44 Magnum... American .357 Magnum like Colt and S&amp;amp;W would have been more reasonable, honestly... But yeah, some wouldn't want revolvers in military shooters at all. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sigh, more revolvers. I'm assuming that the straight pull bolt will be for snipers as opposed to assault/battle rifles, either for bolt actions to increase ROF (even though straight pulls are supposedly more tiring than turn bolts) or for the semi-auto snipers for a bit more accuracy? Teeny tiny list of machine guns, sadface. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weapon Reloads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody seen the GamesCom Coop-Demo? I just noticed how the guy reloads his empty shotgun. First round into the chamber, all the following into the tube. I think they got it right this time. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 10:08, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't see that one, but I saw the M1014 reload in the leaked alpha footage, and it does do that :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:19, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Tactical pistol reloads too :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:30, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 Alpha Gameplay == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of Alpha gameplay videos on Youtube is insane, but in one of them I did see an MP7A1. Looked like the same model used in the Medal of Honor reboot. It was only seen for a moment, so hopefully someone can add more information? [[User:Miyazawa|Miyazawa]] 22:11, 18 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The MP7 is setup the same way as the MoH one, using the stock, grip, and pistol sights, but obviously has a proper empty reload. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tried to add the MP7A1 on the BF3 weapon listing underneath the submachine guns but someone keeps on deleting it. I havent uploaded an image from youtube because honestly I dont know how, can someone help out with this and stop deleting this post as the weapon IS CONFIRMED. [[User:Valant]] 2:58PM, September 9, 2011 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
: No, it's not. You're not allowed to post anything from the Alpha build. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 17:18, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Valant here reposting MP7 gameplay, and to reply YES I CAN post because most weapons you see on page from the alpha/PAX gameshows. In fact for the most part all of the weapons should be deleted because they are from the same build. I have provided a link to show first hand footage. Once the game is released and this is fact checked, the comment I left before  can be deleted. Here is the link again:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvvdBhH0r4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just not getting into your head, isn't it?  Screencaps from non-official/leaked footage are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.  SO yeah, it's nice and all that you're linking that in the discussion, but please DO NOT edit the main page again until beta comes out. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:51, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh REALLY? Because last time I checked there are several screen caps and images that are of some low quality camera taking a picture of a screen DURING ALPHA! Check the muther f*****g G36C section, or The UMP45, the AK74M, the DIO KH2002, and G3A3. These are all weapons from the same build of the game and these have pages, ergo the MP7 should have its own section. Now, im off to put the post BACK UP so suck it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are confusing Closed Alpha with NDA and Game Shows (Expos) intended for public. Those ones are categorised as Pre-alpha‎ (expos before Alpha) and Pre-beta (expos after Alpha). And you are just asking to get reported. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:03, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.....reported.....really....well then if thats the case as I posted on another MP7 related discussion below Ill wait till the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; news about it comes out&lt;br /&gt;
== Full Auto Carbine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Been reading and watching videoa and they all have the M4A1 listed as a carbine. Does anyone know if the M4A1 fires full auto, three round bursts, or a single shot when fired?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M4A1 is a carbine that is full auto or semi, just like real life, is that wierd? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbines ==&lt;br /&gt;
What makes me really happy is they got the term Carbine right; the M4A1 is an M16 Carbine, the AKS-74U is an AK-74 Carbine, the SCAR-H CQC is a SCAR Carbine, the G36C is a G36 Carbine, the SG553 is a SG550 Carbine, and, well, you could call the A-91 an AKM Carbine I guess. That's also why the relatively short HK416 is in the Assault Rifle section and not the Carbine one: it's not a Carbine. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:52, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Trivia Information''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL in addition to Assault Rifle and Carbine category, there is also so called Sub-Carbine category (that is, shorter than Carbine). Four of the above mentioned pairs have three guns in these categories (and three of these four pairs even have additionally Automatic Rifle/Light Machine Gun variant but that's a different story). And here is the list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M4 Commando &amp;lt; M4 &amp;lt; M16&lt;br /&gt;
:AKS-74U &amp;lt; AK-105 &amp;lt; AK-74(M)&lt;br /&gt;
:G36C &amp;lt; G36K(E) &amp;lt; G36(E)&lt;br /&gt;
:SG 553 &amp;lt; SG 551 &amp;lt; SG 550&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And to which category HK416 belongs, [http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/hk416_specs.asp depends on the variant]. Quite a list, isn't it? ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And while AKM didn't have official carbine (there was [http://www.red-alliance.net/forum/index.php?topic=11481.0 a prototype] and that's it), SKS can be considered one somewhat :P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe that was interesting to read :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:45, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Again... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's with the people using this &amp;quot;fact sheet&amp;quot; to clutter the main page with weapon titles. Can't they wait for more substantial material before adding stuff? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:02, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed; pages that are just lists of weapons without pictures or really any info look terrible, let's wait for them to show up. The people who care can find it here on the talk page, or Google :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Leaked info is not allowed, and entries with no pics or info aren't very much liked either. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:29, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^ Precisely. Official artwork, renders, graphical announcements (like that for Physical Warfare Pack, or Battlelog), screenshots, trailers, gameplay videos; screenshots made from official trailers and gameplay videos. All those things will do. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UMP==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can see it in a video from nvidia, the player to the right of the interview, you can see him using a UMP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
unkown what calibre, but im just gonna assume its UMP45 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:38, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==HK416==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
another video from nvidia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUyIIIKta44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if you pause at 0:30 it looks like the HK416--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:42, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M27 IAR, to be specific. Based on the HK416, yes, but not a normal HK416. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:25, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well the Hk146 is in, it appeared on the battlelog stat page. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 09:25, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weird Weapon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is that weapon the guy starts using at 2:24, in this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs ? It looks like an AS VAL, but that optic setup is weird. I wish they sticked to the real life russian optics, instead of creating rail-attaching versions. E.g.: The PK-AS (russian holographic) is actually offset to the left side of the gun, not aligned with the bore or mounted on a rail.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 08:20, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's quite hard to get hands on real Russian weapons in Sweden, so work is done with what's available... Oh, and PK-AS isn't holographic sight, it's reflex sight. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:56, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be the VSS. You can use iron sights on a sniper rifle so they might allow you to use reflex and holographic sights as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's no VSS, there's a VAL, but this guy's an Engineer, so it doesn't matter either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:14, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fact Sheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People, while it has been confirmed that the fact sheet is indeed official, it's also been confirmed that it '''IS NOT A FINAL LIST''', it only shows the equipment available '''SO FAR'''. So don't worry, I'm sure many more equipment options will come (I hope these include an MP5). [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 20:34, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, Demize wouldn't confirm whether the Karkand guns will be able to be used in standard BF3, but the way he said it seemed to hint they might, so I'm betting we'll see the MP5 and PP-19 Bizon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:26, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonzaga that's pretty much false hope , because there not going to release an official fact sheet and then add &amp;quot;many more guns&amp;quot; its not even wishful thinking its just stupid.and Alex when somethings is unconfirmed that doesn't mean its automatically going to be in the game, and if its anything like bfbc2 which it is, the guns will be seperate like the Vietnam expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: First, no need to call me stupid. And second, do you really think they can't add more stuff to the game 3 months away from the release? Not even the beta is out! Plus, by equipment I didn't necessarily mean more weapons. I guess you thought so because my example was a weapon.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:03, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did not call you stupid, I called your idea stupid.You really think that there going too add tonnes more &amp;quot;equipment&amp;quot; after they've released an official statement than that is stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's stupid here is you not signing your posts. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:06, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lol owned :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:47, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS has a plastic stock ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirmed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:36, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 full weapons list ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is up on official [http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ bf3 blog].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not the official blog. As it says in the description, it's a fan site. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:21, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, but it is news of an actual official announcement. --[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 00:00, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The announcement was leaked, meaning that the information it contains has no place on the main page. Until we get official imagery of each weapon, they should not be added to the main page. Just makes everything look a bit messy and half-arsed if you ask me. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:49, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About SVD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So were there any news from Demize or some official material released that confirmed that the magazine for SVD was fixed or not? Should it have been changed to NDM-86 on the main page? Only seen it in leaked Alpha (which ''could'' have been a temporal state, considering that SVU in BC2 had proper magazine (SVD and SVU use the same one), and this one probably ported from MoH for testing purposes). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:35, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battleblog #8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sig 553 and Strela/Igla launcher confirmed in a post on the official Battlefield blog [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/08/25/battleblog-8-build-your-weapon-of-choice.aspx] --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, suppressive fire with carbine :) And the modelled launcher is [[SA-7 Grail|Strela-2]] (NATO reporting name: SA-7 Grail) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thought as much, was the disk-shape thingy at the front that gave it away. &amp;lt;3 the weapon customisation that BF3 will offer though, gonna be awesome. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the primary indicator for Strela-2 is that, errr, under-barrel thingy with tube-and-spike shape while every other model is ball-and-tube. Here is a nice chart: [http://blueprintbox.com/watermark-gif.php?img=./data/media/384/sa-14-strela-gremlin.gif]&lt;br /&gt;
:::And yeah, customisation is great \o/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the bit I meant, forgive my extremely technical description XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:06, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, heh, right. Thought you meant the launcher tube itself :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:47, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incoming weapon modification options seem very exciting....lots of options to tailor your weapon to your specifics. However, the only detail about the blog that keeps me sceptical is the fact that you need to unlock every feature for each weapon individually. Knowing that from MW2 that would mean hours and hours and hours of playing with just one weapon to finally unlock the parts needed to tailor it to your specifics, only to then unlock the next weapon you've been longing for and then you need to start again from scratch with that weapon. Rather frustrating IMO. Would a better idea to make the modification parts a global unlock, so that once you unlock say supressors with an assault rifle, it counts for ALL other assault rifles too...same with LMG's, Pistols, Shotgungs, etc. [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:05, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
Found it; 2nd video, 21 seconds in. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:13, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link please? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 09:25, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OOPS, sorry, here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://ob-game.blogspot.com/2011/08/battlefield-3-three-videos-from-pax.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:57, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ummm you're wrong thats an mp412 , the scope also looks russian which gives it away&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually it doesn't look like the Mp412 at all or the T44, it looks a little different, take a look at this image I snapped of it&lt;br /&gt;
: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/687/mp412orcoltpython.jpg/&lt;br /&gt;
: To me it almost looks like a Colt Python from Black Op's, notice the iron sights, front and rear (the white markings) and the silhouette of the barrel and cylinder as well as the positioning of the grip, it's hard to say but my vote is towards a Colt Python. DICE did say they were going to add Faction specific weapons and if you look a little earlier the guy was using a Stinger. I'd think a Colt Python .357 Magnum would go nicely as a US analogue to the Russian MP412 .357 Magnum. Also to the Scope, it could just be a Russian style scope attached to a US weapon, they did say that the customization was huge so it's a possibility [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:47, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its an mp412 , if it was a python it would have grooves down the barrel housing which it doesn't its solid like the mp412 also I noticed the break action latch near the iron sight, which also corresponds to the mp412 , the python does not have a break open design. *Edit* also the colt python is not in the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The devs didn't say there isn't any other revolver in the game, thus shouldn't you, Persistent Mr. Anonymous. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:17, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, it's NOT a 412, but it could be a Python, some S&amp;amp;W, the Raging Bull, I don't know. The lighting's wierd, but it looks stainless to me, which would be good if the MP412 is black. The SKS, which is synth, has been spotted with an EOTech, so unlocking American optics for Russian guns and vice versa is confirmed. I'm thinking every optic, with the exception of the 6x and 12x sniper scopes, can be used on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:33, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, if you cant indentify that gun, then you shouldn't really be on the site to be honest, because you can clearly tell that's a mp412 the colt python has barrel housing grooves this doesnt it solid like an mp412 , you can also see the break action latch is,colt pythons dont have this because they are not break reloaders. *Edit* and how can you say that it is stainless? its clearly black with a synthetic grip.&lt;br /&gt;
:In that case, by your rationale you should leave right now. Ignoring everything else about the gun, look at the muzzle end. This pistol has a rounded barrel with a raised rib. The Mp412 does not. Also, the locking indents on the cylinder are wrong for a MP412, where they are small cuts coming from the rear of the cylinder, rather than the more traditional ones shown here. The part of the frame that meets the rear of the cylinder is also wrong for a MP412, which would have a &amp;quot;step&amp;quot; rather than a smooth ramp where it widens to the width of the cylinder. Due to the motion blur ghosting on this image it is really hard to tell anything about it so we will just have to wait and see. Also, sign your posts and stop being so condescending.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:22, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, just noticed that in the same clip the person in front of you has a G36C, so that can go ahead and be confirmed, along with the Stinger for that matter.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:47, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021255.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, these are official videos, not DICE ones, but offical meaning by a site/company etc; should they be added to the main page? It's kind of a grey area. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:25, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAX and NVIDIA are definitely can be considered official source just as E3 and IGN. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok lets just leave it as the t44/mp412 for now, if we cant agree on what gun it is, then theres no point arguing senselessly we'll have to wait until the game comes out to properly identify it --[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 14:10, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M4 and M4A1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was just browsing through twitter when i noticed something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/108437158804717568&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
both the M4 and M4A1 is in. like how the the M16A3 and A4 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 10:54, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's amuses me because I had ''exact'' the same thoughts. Seems I wasn't alone xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:10, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems to me more that BF3 will have much more weapons than we thought. Well, let's just pick one up and kick some asses with it :) --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:12, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think its pretty cool they are getting multiple variants for each gun. Heres hoping for an AK-47 unlock.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 12:06, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the same twitter he makes a point of saying that the M4A1 was designed for special forces whereas the standard weapon that would be found being used by Marines is the M4. My spidey sense is telling me that the standard weapons will be the burst M4 and M16A4, and they will be upgradable to full auto M4A1 and M16A3 (flat-top receiver won't tally and the number will make no sense to the layman but whatever).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, he already said the full auto ones are default. But I'd figure in SP we're more likely to see the burst ones. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:31, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::SP: M4 for regular Marines, M4A1 for USSOCOM units, something like that. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:50, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In any case, it's awesome they added variants of many weapons. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 17:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:28, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't remember where I saw it from, probably from Battlefield wiki but I remember seeing that the weapon variants were based on each Classes Kit selection. So for example, take the Assault class, as it's being merged with the Medic Class, Players would have the option to equip either a Grenade Launcher of carry around a Medkit. So for example, an M16A3 could be default setting with a Medkit as a piece of equipment but the M16A4 is used when attaching a grenade launcher. But that's just my theory [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:37, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not really merging, they're just going back to how they had it in BF2142 (Assault = Medic + Assault, Recon = Sniper + Special Forces, Engineer = Anti-tank + Engineer and Support = um, Support, his main &amp;quot;thing&amp;quot; being his extra droppable things like a portable shield and a sentry gun). In 2142 every Assault had a Medkit since you don't want to give your medics the option of being even more useless, the optional item for the Assault class was the defib. The fastest way to get TK'd as Assault was to have someone realise you weren't carrying one. I imagine this one will be the same, Support will always have an ammo box and assault will always have a health box. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PWP Trailer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-ukxgldpOo&amp;amp;feature=feedu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
warning, containts footage from operation metro they some players may find offensive. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:58, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is... ''SKS''? Reminds me of AK-47 in MW2 *sadface*&lt;br /&gt;
:Another thing noted: incorrect reticles for M145 and PKS-07 are still in... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:27, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember though DICE did say that you can &amp;quot;customize&amp;quot; your weapon, that might be a SKS just heavily modified by the player rather than appearing as the &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; weapon. Who know's if we're lucky, the SKS might be featured as standard in it's default config [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As much as I would want it to be, I doubt that what DICE meant by customization. BF3 so far doesn't seem to have customization as elaborate as, for example, [[Ghost Recon: Future Soldier]]. Thus this tacticool SKS is probably the only one *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:44, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; -.-... OMG! What the heck is their deal with the DAO-12? Can't they just call it how it supposed to be called?! --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 10:01, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE seems to have obsession with this &amp;quot;designation&amp;quot; as it tracks way back from Battlefield 2 (2005) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:16, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DAO-12 was used because of a legal conflict with Armsel using the Striker name, it became a fan favorite so they kept the name. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:09, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
i asked Demize on twitter and he replied saying it was a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 14:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly, and we all know how bad most gamers are at identifying weapons, the MW3 crowd widely believed the ACR was a SCAR because the ACR was tan (in MW2 the SCAR was tan and the ACR was this ugly grey colour, and now the ACR is tan). If they renamed it Striker a lot of BF players would think it was a different gun :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:20, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Er, that doesn't really sound like a bad thing :/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:29, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i asked demize about it, and he said they named it the DAO-12 as a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:57, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
I asked demize if there was an m14 battle rifle and he replied ,and said there is a M39 EMR so that can now be added to the weapons list.--[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 16:07, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He also said SG 550 would be in, official blog showed SG 553. And SKS is &amp;quot;SKS&amp;quot;. We need official ''illustrated'' material. As soon as it is available - go ahead, put it in. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:29, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, if we don't have a picture, don't add it, even if it's not leaked. It's not like we won't have everything up pretty soon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1/M16 Gas block question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen quite a few topics concerning the lack of a visible gas block on the M4's and M16's in a number of shooters, and I was wondering if it was possible that the gas blocks could be either low-profile gas blocks that were either not visible or were actually under the RAS, or if the gas blocks were actually integrated into an after-market RAS. It seems odd to me that developers would repeatedly make the same mistake over different games in different franchises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's possible to just remove the front sight without removing the gas block on a standard M16 rifle and M4 but it'd be a little exposed. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:23, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you mean with a hacksaw? Aren't the gas block and front sight a single piece of metal? It is however possible to get a low profile gas block (relatively easy replacement) that only extends above the barrel to the height of the gas tube plus a few mm, so that certain free floating RIS systems can be mounted over the top of it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:39, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That was my question; with all the Military consultants they have coming in and looking at this stuff, I'd always assumed that they had just modeled an after market RIS and low-profile gas-block.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder why developers won't just model Flat Top Mounts\Risers on the sights for M4s\M16s ? That's how the problem is solved IRL, including in U.S. Military. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:16, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd imagine that most modellers don't realise that the front sight is also the gas block, so they see no problem in removing it for aesthetic/gameplay purposes. 99% of gamers probably don't realise either.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:15, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both the modellers and the gamers doesn't supposed to care about this kind of things, only people like us, it can concern. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 09:31, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was well after I got into learning about firearms and such that I found out the front sight (gas block) and stock tube (buffer tube) are required for the AR series to function, so you can't remove either pretty much. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's true that the stock front sight post is also the same piece of metal as the gas block, but you can remove them so long as you put a new gas block on.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I meant you can't just take it off :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Confirmed to be the more modern 5.56mm version by Demize. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:08, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Guillotine Teaser Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else seen it? There's a mortar that the player-character uses to send up flares (I think they called them illumination rounds) and I think the player-character also uses a Mk. 17 with some sort of 4x scope. Sorry, I'm still fairly new to this. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:27, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the mortar is an M224, and yes it was a Mk.17 with an ACOG (magazine looked a bit small in the mag-well, but could be the angle as could only be seen when climbing the wall). Also, it looks like the guy who is stabbed at the end of the video is carrying a G3A3 with an ACOG.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 series reload animation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm fairly new to this site, though I've been following it closely to see the development of the firearms that will appear in Battlefield 3.&lt;br /&gt;
I've been reading that a lot of you guys are expecting an accurate portrait of the M16 series reload animation in the game. I just wanted to ask how do you properly reload an M16 in real life? It is my understanding that when the rifle is empty, you load it by pulling the charging handle. But when there is a bullet still in the chamber you just need to press the bolt catch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I just want to get this clarified since I've never been able to understand the reload mechanic of the M16.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:14, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:With the exception of loading the gun for the first time or clearing a jam, you never need to touch the charging handle. If you are reloading from a partial magazine, there will be a round in the chamber so all you need to do is drop out the magazine and push a new one in. When you you empty the magazine in an M16 type weapon the bolt locks back automatically, so you drop out the magazine, put a new one in, and then all you need to do is push the bolt release on the left side to let the bolt go forwards (you can also push the forward assist if you feel like it).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:20, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the third reason you might is if you just picked it up off the ground, to check it's still mechanically sound. Though that sorta falls under clearing a jam. Edit: Also you might part-pull it on drawing it if you're into brass checks, though given how often FPS characters change weapons habitually brass-checking on draw would probably indicate a very short memory. &amp;quot;Yep, still there from ten seconds ago, how bout that.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:09, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could rack the charging handle if you like, but the proper way to reload and empty M16 type weapon is to just slap the bolt release. I call it the ping pong paddle. A lot of games forgets about little things like reloads for weapons [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 01:02, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who removed the MP7!?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, who took away the MP7 from the submachine gun catergory? I spent a whole 20 minutes adding that section of the article and some guy just deleted it. Why? It was really in the game and not in any way spammy or vestigial.  Whoever took away put it back. Come on, I don't want to remake the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THere are NO official images of it.  And no official video footage has featured it.  Don't post images from the Alpha --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 03:20, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the fact remains that it has been seen in the game, and it was already on the page before I made the changes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why can't I use the Alpha? I don't know if there is or is not a rule regarding alpha version footage and stuff. I thought the purpose of this site was to chronicle what weapons were used in what movies/games/TV/Anime.  If I have evidence that the MP7 is in BF3, why does it matter whether or not it was from the Alpha or official footage?  The image I used was from a gameplay video I saw on Youtube.  Does this mean no one can use their own gameplay videos?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, it means that you have to wait for officially released material or for the game to actually come out. This applies to leaked gameplay footage, images from leaked betas, dubious leaked information in general (eg the MW3 leaks from Kotaku) unapproved on-set photos, leaked movie footage like that infamous cut of ''X-Men Origins: Wolverine'', and so on. Building an article is not a race, if we have to wait to confirm something is official, that's what we do. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:49, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose that makes sense, I'm gonna keep that in mind when making contributions in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought anything to do with the Alpha was under an NDA anyway? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:31, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, if you look at the screencap he posted the guy who leaked it deliberately blacked out his own name. Obviously knew he shouldn't have been recording it and posting it in the first place. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, for the last frickin' time.  Please DO NOT add weapons that are not in any official gameplay vids/trailers/screenshots, until they are.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 14:02, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ HashiriyaR32: Hey! I was also someone who tried adding the section of the MP7. Its in the alpha videos but to be fair, so is every freaking gun that is on this page! The only videos that are available are the ones from the alpha. Seriously take the amount of time it takes to delete the post and go onto youtube and see for yourself! In fact, after posting this I will repost the MP7 with a link to the youtube video...Also FYI I happen to love this website and for all it stands for and I try to monitor several different games to make sure the info is correct, I would never want to add something that didnt exist in a videogame/movie. Valant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What? Nothing on the page is from the alpha, everything's from screenshots, trailers, concept art, or official videos, like EA Pwned, IGN, etc. If you don't believe me, give me an example. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:52, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Valant, its as simple as this. To take part in the Alpha you had to sign a non disclosure agreement. That means that any footage that you have seen was illegally distributed. Until guns show up in an official (and legal) source, they shouldn't be listed here. The MP7 may very well be a weapon in the game, but the point is that at this point that information has not been publicly release, to say nothing of the fact that legal screenshots cannot be posted on here. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:11, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right, and as soon as the Beta is out, we can add everything, it's only a week-ish, and besides, WE all know the MP7 &amp;amp; others are in, and they can be mentioned on the talk page, just the official page can't have it. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:39, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I should just delete this whole page then shouldnt I? Because again every weapon we are seeing IS NOT CONFIRMED! There is no beta released and only Alpha videos....Seriously this is bullshit&lt;br /&gt;
:The difference is that all the other weapons are from material that was released by EA, or from footage that they allowed to be shot (The images from the G36C section are from an interview with one of the developers IIRC) as opposed to the video you posted which was illegal made and distributed by someone breaking the NDA they signed. As you seem unable to grasp this, just wind your neck in for a week or so until the Beta is released, and then it can be posted with LEGALLY obtained confirmation images. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:15, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If posting info from a breach of NDA is the main reason than I can understand that. Then I shall wait for the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; information to be released.&lt;br /&gt;
== G3A3 and UMP.45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The weapons can be seen in these videos from GameSpot in the Tokyo Game Show 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it's cam footage you can clearly see the pick-up icon of the weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should work their magic and add those to the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd0M7_3wENw Part 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbsI9Vsv5wE Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arOhTIaeGGY Part 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 12:59, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can have it down in about 20 minutes. --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would imagine that if it is cam footage it has likely not been officially release and is against copyright, so probably shouldn't have caps on here. You can get a shot of the G3A3 from the end of the guillotine trailer though.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:05, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the two weapons on the page. Since the videos were not leaked but released by a reputable game journalism/review site (Gamespot.com) it should be okay, right?  If they weren't allowed to release it Gamespot wouldn't have done so. I looked around and other gaming websites are posting the footage as well [http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tgs-11-battlefield-3/721062]. I'm pretty new to IMFDB, so is the stuff I saw in the gameplay okay to post? --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Similary to E3 with IGN, PAX with NVIDIA, TGS with GameSpot definitely can be considered official source. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:53, 18 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1911 Confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gunclub.ea.com/us/intel/blog/battlefield3-weapon-unlock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For being an EA gunclub member you get an M1911 :P --Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Gun-Club/images/bf3-gun-unlock.jpg --[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:39, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not too sure exactly what pistol they have based this on though. It has slanted cocking serrations on the slide (rear only), non target sights, beavertail grip safety and a rounded burr hammer. Closest thing I can think of is the early version of the [[1911#M-45_MEUSOC|M-45 MEUSOC]], which are a old USGI 1911 frame with a [[1911#Springfield_Armory_M1911_-_A1|Sprinfield Armoury]] slide, a rounded hammer, a beavertail grip safety and Pachmayr rubber grips (along with some other less obvious improvements).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I'm pretty sure it IS the original version of the MEU. Also, you missed the Springfield 3-hole trigger. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:24, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gun Club? Looks like EA is messing up again: http://gunclub.ea.com/us/mygunclub/rewards&lt;br /&gt;
:They haven't even fixed the stat tracking :S --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:12, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 Open Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, EA confirmed the PC/X360/PS3 BETA startup. Begining 27.09 for those who have MoH 2010 Tier One Edition, and 29.09 for the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
Good opportunity to test the game and get some guns updated :). ~ GumBoy 21.09.2011 16.07 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, the early access is open for people with the Medal of Honor Limited Edition as well, not just Tier One. It's also for people who pre-ordered before a certain cutoff, but I can't remember the specifics. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 09:10, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can't wait for this, hope we get a different map this time, Operation Metro was good but not great. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:37, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Caspian Border would be great :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:06, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP2000 Spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog pics here: http://www.battlefieldlog.com/2011/09/battlefield-3-beta-battlelog.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pdUIBRNHpXo/Tn4uZQaayQI/AAAAAAAAAdw/PVmts2hVNjU/s1600/battlelog-4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's the pistol, what's the shotgun? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:09, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the handgun is a Glock variant, whilst the shotgun is Benelli M3 Super 90. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 08:02, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I saw the PP2000 in action at Eurogamer Expo, looked pretty good. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:16, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hmm, I never saw it before. The shotgun is the 870 MCS and the pistol is the Glock 17. If you look at the page, he's level 0 with no XP, so these are the first unlocks, which makes sense given what they are: a shotgun, a pistol that isn't faction-based that's similar to the M9 and MP443, and a PDW. Also, now that the PP2000 has a stock we won't have any more stockless guns, specifically stockless guns with scopes... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:08, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, the magazine tube is rather short for M870 MCS. Which would mean it is rather regular variant of M870 with pistol grip and full stock. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:49, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, the MCS is modular, hence the name, it just has the 4 round tube as standard, with the 7 round one as an attachment. This is the MCS: http://www.kiesler.com/shop/ProductImages/Model870MCS_PartSLG.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:57, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The magazine tube in MCS is supposed to have the same length as the barrel as can be seen here: [http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/Firearms/Shotguns%20Pump/MCS.aspx Remington Model 870 Modular Combat Shotgun (MCS)]. Thus the 3+1 MCS would have the same 10&amp;quot; barrel. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:23, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I understand it's supposed to, but it's still an MCS, just not assembled properly or something. If you don't like it, just use the extended tube attachment, I know I will be, and Demize confirmed (how many times have I written those two words now?) all the extended mag attachments are visible, like the MP7s 40 round magazine, or this shotgun. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:50, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::If that's so... Okey, an oddly assembled MCS ¯\(°_o)/¯&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::P.S. I didn't count how many times you have written those two words D: --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:02, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::LOL! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:08, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Demize confirmed that Alex says 'Demize confirmed' a lot. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:00, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::[http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg/hr/im-metal-hs-2000-e.html XD] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACR?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOHjF4_apI&amp;amp;feature=channel_video_title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magpul Masada/ ACR?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 0:36, the handguard and flashhider look very similar to that of the ACR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it might be the SG 553, also has a similar flashhider. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:07, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree, it is the SG 553. Can tell by the design of the rail system, shape of the receiver and the fact that it has a smooth curve to the top of the stock rather than an adjustable cheek riser.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 12:14, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also see the M320 Launcher at 0:41, so thats one more launcher for the page [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:09, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ugh, what a song choice :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whine, whine, whine. No game is good enough for you people. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:41, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not game - song &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, finally can see the M320 mounted instead of standalone :D And yeah, I agree that's the 553. Oh, and what do you mean &amp;quot;you people&amp;quot;? Lol ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:05, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I thought you were complaining about the game. I was just joking when I said that. *rolls eyes* - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:44, 27 September 2011 (CDT)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NDA for Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, from what I'm hearing the Beta is going to be subject to an NDA, just like the Alpha. This may just be for the early access and may be rescinded once it goes public, or it may be for the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What this means is that we can't post info or shots from the Beta build until it is rescinded. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:02, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://twitter.com/#!/zh1nt0/status/115781634879524864 Disregard.] I screwed up, again. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:15, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha :) That's good news [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:18, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G17C modelled after G17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just talked to a DICE dev on Steam, and he told me the reason they modelled the G17C after a regular G17 it's to save prestanda so the game can run as smoothly as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
So that's why is missing those compesators &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; on the slide. And the reason they decided to still call it a G17C, is because is only a minor detail. They probably have more relevant things to fix, than changing the correct name of a weapon. edit: forgot to sign [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's understandable, given the crazy graphics and everthing else this game it running. If they don't change it we'll note it as incorrect on the main page, but note that it was intentionally left out; if they do know the correct difference between the C and standard, but needed to do for technical reasons, I'm happy. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:33, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But someone could state in the main page, that it was left there intentionally due to some other and more important things to worry about in the development of the game. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess that proves that Frostbite 2 Engine is much more complicated and difficult to mod than Refractor 2 Engine. To fix weapon's name in Battlefield 2 one needed a mere Notepad ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:57, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well not change, since the config files will have weapon names in plain text that can be replaced (unless the names are actually images or something). [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:49, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's stupid what the guy from DICE said: &amp;quot;''We modeled the gun after the regular G17 so the game would run faster...''&amp;quot; Huh? So if the gun is actually a 100% G17, why call G17C? Am I missing something here? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 04:10, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Modelling the holes ''would'' require they put an inside surface on the barrel, but I can't see how an engine that features buildings falling into hundreds of pieces of high-detail rubble would be screwed over by that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:47, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corrected some information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went through and fixed some things. There is a Korean M16 that has 4 firing modes and the shotgun in Op Gullotine is a Remington 870 which you can tell by looking at the rear sight. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:23, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has four? Cool, didn't know that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:41, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lack of weapon variety ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theres so many AK and M4 style weapons but no real variety, wheres the steyr, uzi and such.&lt;br /&gt;
The snipers are pretty much useless after the first two so why change ?&lt;br /&gt;
Like 3 AK styled assault rifles ?&lt;br /&gt;
Am i missing the point because it seems Mw3 has a much better weapon variety.&lt;br /&gt;
When i unlocked the SkS it takes 4 bullets to kill. That's double what the other two took even though they're the same calibre. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are lazy. Quite a bunch of unlocks are derivatives of starting weapons. There are so many European weapons that could be put as unlocks, but nooooo! Maybe DICE are saving for DLCs? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah when they said 10 times the unlocks, who knew they meant dogtags and pistols with new attachments. And we have to unlock the same attachments for every other gun over and over. Whats with the lack of guns ? :/ And Some weapons like the m16 take 6 bullets to kill... the ump takes 7 from my experience. So why even bother using these weapons when i can have a sniper that 2 hit kills with a RDS. The beta has dissapointed me. --[[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Maybe the game will have a &amp;quot;Hardcore&amp;quot; mode like the Modern Warfere games. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:51, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Always fun when people complain about balance before the balance has had any meaningful time to settle. Tomorrow people will be complaining half these things are totally overpowered when they figure out how to use them properly. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:34, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Im not complaining about balance, if AR's take 6 hits to kill, i dont mind ill stick to my battle rifle. Just wish there was more variety is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, from trying the PS3 beta it seemed all my weapons took ~6 hits to kill while all their weapons killed me instantly. Nothing like repeatedly being murdered by a spawncamper with, of all the goddamn things in the world, a UMP. &amp;gt;:( [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All of the 5.56mm (and 9mm) weapons do 25 damage at point blank, making them 4 hit kill, and start dropping after about 20 feet, so 5 at midrange seems better, but could be 6, I can't see how far you're shooting. Also, all the 7.62mm (and .45) guns do 33.4 damage at point blank. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, I hope they fix the damage, from what I'm reading it's pretty stupid right now. :\ - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:35, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Personnally I like the fact that there are many AK &amp;amp; AR15 style firearms in it, and for that you have to unlock the attachements for each gun, I don't see a problem there, you just have to use the guns if you really want them. --[[User:VillageFroid|VillageFroid]] 12:11 October 2 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yeah i dont mind unlocking the same attachments over and over its just that they said there's 10 times the unlocks and not the same unlock 10 times however the amount of attachments is a nice touch. I just wish there was more weapons is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There, I removed all Kalashnikov and Stoner weapons and thats what is left, why are you guys complaining? The weapon selection is good. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:04, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G3A3 &lt;br /&gt;
AN-94 &lt;br /&gt;
KH2002 &lt;br /&gt;
AEK-971 &lt;br /&gt;
F2000 &lt;br /&gt;
AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer) &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
G36C &lt;br /&gt;
SCAR-H CQC &lt;br /&gt;
A-91 &lt;br /&gt;
SG553  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M249E2 &lt;br /&gt;
M60 &lt;br /&gt;
M240 &lt;br /&gt;
6P41 &lt;br /&gt;
QYJ 88 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SVD (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
M40A5 &lt;br /&gt;
SV98 &lt;br /&gt;
M98B &lt;br /&gt;
M82A3 (not in MP) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M39 EMR &lt;br /&gt;
SKS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P90TR &lt;br /&gt;
MP7A1 &lt;br /&gt;
UMP45 &lt;br /&gt;
PDR &lt;br /&gt;
PP2000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
870 MCS &lt;br /&gt;
M1014 &lt;br /&gt;
USAS-12  &lt;br /&gt;
Striker &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M9 (US) &lt;br /&gt;
MP443 (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
G17 &lt;br /&gt;
M-45 &lt;br /&gt;
MP412 &lt;br /&gt;
T44 &lt;br /&gt;
93R &lt;br /&gt;
G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the main game comes out, we'll all see the diversity, alot of the weapons in the Beta are mostly there for testing purposes, I haven't even seen anyone unlock ALL the weapons yet in the Beta so I'm not sure how many exist there. Plus we might also see more weapon diversity in the Singleplayer [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:To add on to my reply, I should also mention that while yes I feel a little disappointed that they didn't add some other &amp;quot;common&amp;quot; weapons like a traditional MP5 or some other weapons like certain Pump Action Shotguns, it doesn't really phase me too much, because from what I've seen thus far they've pretty much nailed some of the roles appriopriately. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:23, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok so ive done a bit of research, veteran gives you one extra weapon, Co-op gives you 6 extra weapons and the first expansion gives you 10 weapons.... thats 17 more weapons. I feel more comfortable now :) Not only that but theres plans for more expansions :) http://mp1st.com/2011/10/02/leaked-weapon-list-for-battlefield-3-back-to-karkand-dlc/ - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In realistic terms 9mm subguns and indeed subguns in general have fallen out of favour since the 80s / 90s and largely replaced by 5.56mm carbine rifles in their traditional roles as bad guys started wearing body armour. From what I've heard, neither the UMP or the MP7 did anything like as well as their older brother. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite right. The co-op and veteran weapons are among the list we have now, only the Back To Karkand expantion give new weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something that someone should suggest to the Battlefield Twitter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter so I would appreciate if someone did this for me. I want a option where I can set my spawn prefences. Right now I'm using the UMP 45 and each time I spawn, I set it to 2 round burst and turn off the tac light till I need it. I would like if I can set an option that I spawn the way I want and not full auto. Most of the time I don't use full auto unless its a machine gun. Ghost Recon had this option and I liked it. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 13:26, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excited ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im excited that this game will be more realistic than most others. I like the fact we will also be able to use selector switches. Did I hear right? The UMP-45 has a two round burst mode? I wasn't aware the UMP had a burst mode. I always thought it had Semi and auto.--[[User:Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can have a semi, 2-round burst, auto trigger group option. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:48, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Duh, that's what manufacturer's sites for ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.heckler-koch.de/HKWebText/detailPara/1926/82/4/20/213 UMP on H&amp;amp;K's European site]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/ump_specs.asp UMP on H&amp;amp;K's US site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H&amp;amp;K is usually pretty good about having burst option trigger packs. You just don't hear about it very often because in most movies and television shows, the selector is always set to rock n roll.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 18:22, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=4707&amp;amp;sid=91faa55311d7c875027fba7bd657d6fb&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A whole bunch of leaked info, from the game files I believe. The working names for some SP missions, and all the Co-op and MP maps too, as well as the unique to BTK weapon list. Note that they incorrectly call the HK53 an MP5, even though it actually was called HK53 in BF2 :confused face: As of now it is unknown whether these will carry over to the standard game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-FAMAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-HK53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MGs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBB-95&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-MG36&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L96&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SMG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-PP-19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotgun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Jackhammer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:33, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LOL, Jackhammer is back. That was the only prototype gun in BF2 xD&lt;br /&gt;
:'''@Alex''' HK53 was the carbine for Euro Force's Spec Ops class. Whether MP5 was the submachine gun for USMC's Anti-Tank class ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Edit:''' Ah, I've read the thread. There are probably going to be both weapons in the DLC \o/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure would love to see the FAMAS. I was secretly hoping for the XM8 to return, but I guess you can't get everything. [[user:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 11:40, 3 October 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The XM8 did return, it's called the G36. They just didn't put it inside a silly plastic model spaceship. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 11:19, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well said. I have to agree you on that, I prefer the actual G36 rather than the 'uber-futuristic-tacticool' plastic prototype that is... wait, was... wait it didn't even leave the prototype stages... well anyways, that is the xm8 --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] 12:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== .44 Magnumn, M60, USAS-12 and Claymore gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Found some videos of the Claymore and Revolver in action, looks like the T-44 is just called .44 Magnum any idea what kind of revolver it is? Also M60E4 is seen in one vid with a 200 round capacity and USAS-12 with a 7 round box mag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLW7WcIv_gA&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExvIOmviDgw&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 16:06, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a [[Taurus Model 44]]. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess DICE followed IW's example. They named Colt Anaconda simply &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot; before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm liking the new .44 Magnum from what Videos I've seen so far. Up close it seems to behave just like how a .44 Magnum should. At short-close range (10 or less feet) it seems to kill in one shot to the upper chest/head but further distances (up to say 30-40 feet) seem to kill in 2 shots to the body or one to the head. Plus with addition of a Scoped version, I can see this being the ideal &amp;quot;Mini-Sniper&amp;quot;. I think the way there going about it is the MP412 is the better option up close while the .44 Mag is better at range. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 07:28, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the description of the HK416 on the main page and there is something I don't quite understand.&lt;br /&gt;
In the main page it states that the weapon in-game has 3 firing modes; semi, 3-round burst and auto and that there aren't many Stoner lower receivers that support 3 firing modes. But isn't the Stoner platform manufactured by KAC? And why is it being use on a HK manufactured weapon? And if that is the case, then shouldn't it be pointed out as custom HK416?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And my other question is about the licensing of the weapons. Since there are other HK weapons that goes by their correct names like the MP7A1, G36C, M27 IAR and M320. Why would they license those particular weapons and not the HK416, making DICE name it M416? I think is most likely a misunderstanding rather than a copyright issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please correct me here if I'm wrong. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:24, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are hell-bent on making HK416 the US' service rifle. Can't think of any other reason. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:38, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's because &amp;quot;HK416&amp;quot; has HK's company name right there in the weapon name. It might be more of a copyright thing. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 21:01, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eugene Stoner is the inventor of the the AR 15/AR10/M16/M4. The name for the platform as a whole is the Stoner. There are over 100 manufacturers of AR 15s in the US. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:55, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably what Masterius and Gato said, the Devs really, really want the HK416 to be the US standard (cause it ID better) :) And it has HK in the name, same reason the Glocks are G17/18. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:11, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although Battlefield 2 had HK21 and HK53... And this makes me curious. Are they going to rename HK53 if/when it comes back? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:50, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh right, well then it's probably the same reason the Striker is still the DAO-12, they kept the name the same as it's always been in BF. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:52, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glitch with the PDR? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else notice whenever you're using the PDR, It randomly switches from a 20 round mag to a 30 round mag? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:45, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently the extended mags are included by default.  They're taken off if you have any barrel attachment. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:58, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=5033&amp;amp;sid=fa2af8c4723e98f64dadab8b5b9897d8&lt;br /&gt;
At the bottom. In one we can see a suppressed M40A5, and in on of the AKS-74U ones we can see his Coop buddy has a KH2002. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:54, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS iron-sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone remember which sight you would use in the beta if you were using an M26 mounted on one of the assault rifles? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:48, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I never used the M26 in the beta, but with the M320 mounted on a rifle you would just zoom halfway in, a la the shotguns in previous Battlefield games. I reckon that the M26 would do the same. [[User:Krakydak|Krakydak]] 17:56, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same irons as the P90, Striker, F2000, M40A3, and M98B; the aftermarket ones. Oh wait, ON the AR? The AR's sights, like Crysis 2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:29, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why is the &amp;quot;RPK 74M&amp;quot; chambered in 7.62x39 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111001163136/battlefield/images/5/5f/RPK-74M.png Look here]... note the curvature of the magazine, the lack of the flash hider, the steel ribbed mag.... why can't games ever get the RPK right? Either putting a 75 round drum on the 74M, or this....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A lot of the pics on Battlelog were wrong, like the G18's pic was a 17, but it does have the selector in game. Let me see an in game pic with the 7.62 mag, and I'll agree. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:36, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rather odd that [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/ak74m_656x369.png?cb=1317663410 AK-74M] has proper image but [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/rpk_656x369.png?cb=1317663545 RPK-74M] has black RPK (not even RPKM) instead. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:06, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::On a side note: do 45-round STANAG magazines even exist? Talking about [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/m27_656x369.png?cb=1317664019 M27].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110929075021/battlefield/images/6/69/RPK_-_Beta.gif] that's it in first person, trust me the mag is a 7.62 ribbed steel mag in the game, I can't find a screenshot, but you can see it in the right light while reloading....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes! Not military issue, but I don't get the point of the M27 as a support weapon IRL, this helps at least. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=26456/Product/AR-15-M16-45-ROUND-MAGAZINE [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, cool. Didn't know that :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I didn't know that stuff about the AKs, it's what we're all here for :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:19, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah! :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:52, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I am adding renders of all the weapons from the offical site. In case anyone thinks I missed them, the MP-443, M16A3, F2000 Tactical, KH2002, M16A4, AKS-74U, M4, A-91, and GP-30 do not have entries there yet, but I will add them here when they do. Well, except the GP-30, because I doubt it will get one... poor GP-30 :'( EDIT: Done! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:43, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for this being offtopic:&lt;br /&gt;
:I wish Devs added [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=271&amp;amp;backPID=265&amp;amp;productID=89&amp;amp;pid_product=297&amp;amp;pidList=265&amp;amp;categorySelector=7&amp;amp;detail=&amp;amp;cHash=a367c3feaf GL1] to F2000, [http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?Itemid=5&amp;amp;catid=20:all-other-weapons&amp;amp;id=36:the-hk79-underbarrel-grenade-launcher&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article HK79] to G3 and [http://kbptula.ru/eng/str/strelk/556a91.htm the unnamed UGL] to A-91 (with the barrel length of 415 mm (same as AK-74M), it would be classified as assault rifle (compact one though, because its overall length is lesser than that of AK-74M with stock folded [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_a91m_eng.html] [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_ak-74m_eng.html] )). But that's probably would be too much to ask :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:54, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would have been nice, though, the F2000's GL1 is solved by not letting it mount a GL, and we haven't seen one mounted to the G3 yet. Who knows, maybe it will become an HK79 like the GP-30 :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:06, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things: this site doesn't have a KH2002 page, and if there's a newer version from 2009, shouldn't they have named it KH2009? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't even find any sources mentioning 2009. They just say KH2002 was revealed to public\entered service in 2004 and show the pictures of either long carrying handle or short carrying handle (the most seen one) variant :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:37, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are 3 different versions of the KH2002 I have seen. The first is the initial 2002 model which has a short carry handle and front sight post at the front of the receiver. Then there is the 2006 model that has a long carry handle and no front sight post. Lastly there is the 2009 model that has the long carry handle but a barrel mounted front sight post along with a built up finger grooved front grip. Not sure about the dates, but this is deffinitely the way the KH2002 design progressed. I have also heard that there are three different barrel lengths for the KH2002, but I have only seen the standard length (pictured) and the short barrel, which was on an original model, with the barrel ending at the end of the receiver. Have never seen a picture of the DMR length barrel. As for the name being KH2002, all I can say is that M1903s made in the 30s were called M1903A1s and not M1930s. It is basically the same rifle, so why change the name.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:31, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah true, I guess I'm just thinking there should be some way to tell them apart by name. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:53, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After a bit of research, I found out that the version in this game (have seen exactly the same gun with and without front sight post so not sure which is the correct one, or maybe it is detached when optics are added which appear to be a copy of the old Colt 4x20 scope) is not called the Khaybar but the Sama, so will change the article accordingly.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.irandefence.net/showthread.php?t=44114 This the source], correct? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::First saw it mentioned on MilitaryPhotos.net, but it is mentioned on quite a few Iranian defence forums and blogs that the most recent version (the one in the game) is called the Sama rather than the Khaybar.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:25, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Makarov PB (6P9) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dogtags :) http://www.enterbf3.com/news/579-159-battlefield-3-dog-tags/ What's interesting is, if you look below the M39 in the bottom rightish, there's a Makarov PB, beside the suppressed M9. I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a suppressed MP-443, or if it will actually be in, but it's very interesting. Also note a lot of weapons seem to be missing, most likely since this isn't the full selection of dogtags. Oh, and there's two P90s, someone screwed up :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ya the USAS-12 dogtag shows a SPAS-12 instead--[[User:Anarchy66660|Anarchy66660]] 01:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The designer of PB isn't Makarov, it's Deryagin[http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_spesial_pb_eng.html] :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I was just assuming it was Makarov :/ At any rate, has it ever been in a BF game before? If it's in this one I'm gonna totally use it with the AS :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Makarov but still no USP? :( [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 08:29, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sure MW3 will have more USPs than you can shake a stick at. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 23:24, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic changes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For some reason during the Faultline demo, the M4s were all equipped with ACOGs and the SAW gets the EOtech, but in the actual game, they reverse it where all the M4s during the mission have EOtechs and the SAW had the ACOG. Just something I noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my problem is when an M4 is equipped with an ACOG, we still see the front sight post, but when we aimed, the front sight post disappeared when in reality, we should be able to see see it [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:11, 25 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason for that is because most videogames don't ''do'' scopes, at least not properly. Typically (there's some exceptions) the game removes the rifle viewmodel completely and slaps an overlay over the screen to represent the scope. This results in glitches like drawing the scope a frame too early and ending up looking down the scope overlay at the rifle itself, or, as here, the front sight going AWOL along with the rest of the rifle. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:10, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we need to crop the renders down; that's a lot of white space. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 03:34, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Click the images and look at the sizes, if you do that you'll end up with them about 200 pixels across. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:54, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:So we're padding images then? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:47, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I got those, and those are the originals, as big as they come. If we find bigger ones later, feel free to replace them, but the I after saving 50ish pics, resaving them all as jpegs so they'd work here, uploading them all one at a time, and adding them all to the page, I didn't feel like taking the time to crop :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:20, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally those &amp;quot;in game renders&amp;quot; look to actually be the renders the pickup icons are the outlines of. Hence them lacking rear sights on weapons that can mount optics. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:59, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I got this one ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just uploaded a few screens as tests, I'll do more when I'm awake enough to not suck horribly at the game. Also, this page is a hideous mess. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:07, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just play SP Campaign on Easiest difficulty ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, is Co-op mode using the same missions as SP? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:48, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Apparently not, one of the guys on the forum says there's one co-op mission with a controllable helicopter. I wouldn't know, I've only owned the game for three hours. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:51, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: There is one mission where you spend the entire level in an AH1Z Viper and it's pretty much target practice to get used to the chopper controls as the enemy AI have a hard time figuring out if their weapons are actually guns or if they're just oddly shaped Easy Bake Ovens. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 13:51, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=477166</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=477166"/>
		<updated>2011-10-28T18:51:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* I got this one */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== All weapons in BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list below shows all BF3 weapons that are going to be available either SP or MP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is officially announced by EA, but i'm pretty sure there will be more coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: List has been edited to account for new information (eg: Both M16s and only P90TR) and name corrections (eg: DAO-12 to Striker)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assault Rifles (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A3 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*HK416&lt;br /&gt;
*G3A3&lt;br /&gt;
*AN-94&lt;br /&gt;
*KH2002&lt;br /&gt;
*AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
*F2000&lt;br /&gt;
*AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*M4A1 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AKS-74U (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G36C&lt;br /&gt;
*SCAR-H CQC&lt;br /&gt;
*A-91&lt;br /&gt;
*SG553&lt;br /&gt;
*M4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support)&lt;br /&gt;
*M27 IAR (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M249E2&lt;br /&gt;
*M60&lt;br /&gt;
*M240&lt;br /&gt;
*6P41&lt;br /&gt;
*QYJ 88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.11 Mod.0 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*SVD (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M40A5&lt;br /&gt;
*SV98&lt;br /&gt;
*M98B&lt;br /&gt;
*M82A3 (not in MP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*M39 EMR&lt;br /&gt;
*SKS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*P90TR&lt;br /&gt;
*MP7A1&lt;br /&gt;
*UMP45&lt;br /&gt;
*PDR&lt;br /&gt;
*PP2000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*870 MCS&lt;br /&gt;
*M1014&lt;br /&gt;
*USAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
*Saiga 20K&lt;br /&gt;
*Striker&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*M9 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*MP443 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G17&lt;br /&gt;
*M-45&lt;br /&gt;
*MP412&lt;br /&gt;
*T44&lt;br /&gt;
*93R&lt;br /&gt;
*G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Underbarrels (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M320 with HE/Smoke/Buckshot rounds&lt;br /&gt;
*M26 MASS with Buckshot/Flechette/Frag/Slug rounds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocket Launchers (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.153 SMAW (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPG-7 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*FGM-148 Javelin&lt;br /&gt;
*FIM-92 Stinger&lt;br /&gt;
*SA-18 IGLA&lt;br /&gt;
*AT4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
( Source: http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ ) --Zzang1847 23.09.2011 11.07 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is from a Batlefield 3 fansite and not acctualy offical --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 14:38, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This has been discussed before. While it is technically official since the official gaming news sources are also reporting it, but since there aren't any pictures of 'em you have to wait.--[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 15:55, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pages without pictures or info look ugly. The game's out in less than a month, and the Beta's out in a few days, we can wait, but it does mean we get to know what's in the game anyway, even though it's not on the page :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:20, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although there were no pictures, i believe we still can at least put some description and real picture so someone who is actually uploading in-game pictures don't have to worry about putting explanation and finding pictures from the archive, which takes significant amount of time (in terms of AAA games like this).&lt;br /&gt;
::P.S) Sorry about this discussion already mentioned before. I thought i could give some help, but perhaps i'm not :( ~ Zzang1847 23.09.2011 8.43 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Building an article is not a race, there is just less than a week for the Beta to roll in, not that much to wait. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:52, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it is going to just be Americans, Russians, Generic &amp;quot;Not the Taliban, honest&amp;quot; Middle Eastern Militia and possibly the Iranian army as factions then. Damn. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 10:28, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For SP yeah, but for MP it's been confirmed to be just US and RU. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:46, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faction Specific Weaponry details ==&lt;br /&gt;
no need to worry , about faction specific weaponry , reading through some of Alan Kertz earlier posts.He states that the player once leveled up high enough in the class's levels will gain access to the other factions weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun disparity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the feeling the M4A1 will be the counterpart to the AKS74U. This is wrong, but every game seems to do it. The M4 has a 14.5 inch barrel and is a standard issue weapon. The AKS74U has an 8.3 inch barrel and is issued to vehicle crews. A better setup would be Mk 18 Mod O (or HK416 D10RS) vs the AKS74U. Also, the M16 and AK74 aren't exactly equal either. Maybe pair up the regular M4A1 or SCAR-L with 14.5 inch barrel (for variety) with the AK74?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and what do you think the US/EU counterparts to the SKS, RPK and AS Val will be? There's no US counterpart cartridge to the 7.62x39 and 9x39 as far as I know.&lt;br /&gt;
::There's no val, that's vss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SKS = Mk.11 = SVD. RPK = M27. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:52, 9 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its the asval not vss :S.[[User:lukewilliams010]] 12:14 ,19 august 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM\PKP operation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've yet to see a game that properly portraits PKM operation with its 2 level feeding system and non-disintegrating belts. Curious if in BF3 they'll get it right. Doubt it though...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic mounts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optic mounts on all russian weapons are wrong. Basically it's an PSO with optic tube cut off and rail slapped instead of it. Then every Russian scope has its original mount removed so it can be fixed on that picatinny rail. They also didn't bother making [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/1789/i-2863.jpg proper mount] for PKP and just put rail on top of the receiver lid. I was expecting more attention to details in BF3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the Russian army IS starting to use RIS, just look at the AK-9. [http://world.guns.ru/assault/rus/ak-9-e.html] While it does seem a bit sloppy, it can be justified in a way. At least it isn't as bad as that AK-abomination from MW2 and the RPD with rails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know when the beta is starting? cant wait for it! --[[Special:Contributions/109.78.246.33|109.78.246.33]] 21:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or for that matter, how we can get in on it? [[User:That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck|That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get into the Battlefield 3 beta, you need to buy specially-marked versions of the recent Medal Of Honor [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya i got it, do you know when were getting the codes?--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 02:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no clue.[[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you registered your Medal of Honor with your EA-Account, you'll get the invitation and infos, as soon as there is something, so far nothing is known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish I could try the beta [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not just you, after the videos they releases pretty much everybody is dying to get hands on the game. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 12:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta will be open to everyone. Those who got MoH, will get in earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-something-something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check that dude in the BG. also what I think *might* be a holster, but I'm probably wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf6.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's definitely an AK-series rifle, which one I can't be sure of. If I had to guess however, I'd say either an AK-74, AK-74M, or AK-101. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 08:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a dump bag on his hip. At least that's what I think it is. It definitely isn't a holster though, since most drop leg holsters are strapped to your thigh. Why a guy with a belt fed machine gun has a dump bag through is beyond me.--[[User:1SAZ|1SAZ]] 09:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If I had to guess, he may have been issued an M4 or M16 and picked up the MG prior to the pic being taken. You can also see some STANAG mag pouches on the front of his vest too. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I Agree with  Orca1, I know you can't see from the distance, but the profile of the muzzle looks like one of those 3. As the game is set in 2014, im assuming it's either an AK-74M or AK-101. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240G is M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M240G is actually a M240B as seen by gameplay screenshots. You can also identify it's M240B by the heat shield. I guess that inaccuracy in every war game (including new games) will always be. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I knew it was some kind of M240 variant, but since it was being used by a Marine I assumed it was the 240-Golf variant since they typically use that instead of the 240-Bravo. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrong use of the word &amp;quot;anachronistic&amp;quot; there. An anachronism is an object, event, or person portrayed in a chronologically inaccurate time period. The Marines using the M240B is a mistake, no doubt, but it's not an anachronism as the M240B still does technically ''exist'' at the same time beside the Golf model. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:42, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got these pics off BF3 nation;&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf1.jpg appears to be some M16 varient which oddly enough doesnt have any rear sights.&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf5.jpg Another shot of the M16 like weapon (Just going to mention the nice detail on the mag). And hey, new weapon, A COFFEE MUG!!! &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 15:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an M16A4, the developers probably didn't detailed the weapon enough. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 16:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this as well. Im guessing they just forgot, The sights are even not there in the gameplay videos. I do hope they change it though, might seen a little silly firing with neither iron sights or optics. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the new 12 min trailer, roughly at the 7min mark when they put surpessive fire on the sniper, is it me or does the guy on the left, with the M16A4 fire full auto?. [[User:Sike|Sike]] 17:20, 18 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm commenting without checking, but remember how fast you can fire the M16A4 and 93R in BC2? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:23, 19 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racking charging handle when reloading after empty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new trailer showed you shooting an M4 and when you are empty, you reload but instead of pressing the bolt release, you charge the handle. I seriously hope this isn't the default reload [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the begining of the trailer, it did say that it was pre-alpha code.  They'll hopefully have the modeling and other animations fixed by then.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 05:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, cause I'm getting bad flashbacks to games in early 2000 that pulls the charging handle when doing mid mag reloads [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I remember correctly, the M16A2 &amp;amp; M4A1 reloading animations from ''[[Battlefield 2|BF2]]'' had the character use the charging handle instead of the bolt release when reloading, they may have borrowed that. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 05:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3D modeling and animation is kinda hard to &amp;quot;borrow&amp;quot; from older engine/file format. I'd guess it's probably &amp;quot;director thinks this looks more dynamic&amp;quot; like [[Black]], or maybe the animator is under heavy influence of games in early 2000 :/ [[User:Ssate|Ssate]] 02:43, 12 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I hope they change it to using bolt release because it's wield for someone to do that unless you're clearing a malfunction [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 06:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm liking how they now keep track of a round in the chamber and you don't go through the whole reloading animation, maybe this time we'll have proper pistol reloads.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; pistol reload? [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 20:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think he meant that the slide does not lock back when the pistol runs out, like in Medal Of Honor MP. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 20:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in Bad Company and the second one they did the same thing where the slide didn't lock back. If it's one thing Modern Warfare has done right is the reload animation...well except maybe for the ACR. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also a problem with the SPAS-12: the character pump it after the reload even if there was a shell in the chamber. Same in Black Ops. Not to mention that &amp;quot;all pistols were DAO&amp;quot; since the hammers never move. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 08:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About reloads, in last years Metal of Honor, you do a combat reload when your shotgun is empty. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another nice touch that they put in was that they left the front sight on the M4 even though it has an optical sight.  In most games the front sight is either removed completely (like Bad Company 2 or Call of Duty 4) or else it has a flip down front sight (like Modern Warfare 2).  Adds a nice level of realism in my opinion.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I always thought removing the front sight from M4/M16 rifles in games was utterly stupid mall ninja BS, not to mention making the gun look ugly as sin. In a real-world situation, if your optic fails and you don't have any iron sights to fall back on, you're basically SOL while the other guy who's never even heard of a red dot sight is still capable of sending rounds your way. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 10:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't some optics already mount back-up irons (BUS / BUIS) on them? [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:46, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this too. All BF games seem to get reloads completely wrong. You get the feeling the make you rack the charging handle with a mid mag reload to clear the current round so they don't have to take it into account. As awesome as charging the action yourself, or racking the top slide looks, you just never do it during a normal reload. I do hope they change this yeah, but I doubt they will looking back at the other games. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE Battlefield games, but I don't see how its that hard to get weapons right when they hire Ex-military guys to get everything else right. You can even find these things on Google these days. And with COD removing the iron sights on the M16s and M4s they are also removing the gas block. The gun would have to fire one round and then the action be charged manually. I love these games, but some times the ignorance they show towards the things they claim are most important pisses me off a bit.--[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, at least they don't go the extra mile and have guns being fired with the safety on, I can think of a couple of games that do that. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 14:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The use of military and ex-military people are for realistic look of the soldiers, their movements, they communications, and look of ground vehicles and aircraft... But don't forget that it is not that hard to search for photos in the internet of weapons, vehicles, aircraft, uniforms, equipment, etc. and create it in the computer, without using the help of the military guys. As what we see know. BF3 goes for the realistic way, that's right, but it is not realistic in the small details. CoD4:MW, CoD:MW2, CoD:BO, the new MoH, OFP series, ArmA series, and of course the series of BF from BF2 and onwards have so many unrealistic small details that can be fixed easily by using mod tools. The developers doesn't really care if the M4A1 has gas block (CoD) or if you charge the weapon with the charging handle (BF2, BF3), they just want to create a game, realistic or not just the gamers will be happy. It is a bit funny as so many things are so realistic in this game but someone who has good military knowledge will notice right away for the f*** ups. In OFP:RR for example, they only thing that bothers me is that the M16A4 in-game looks like the Canadian C7 rifle. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 18:50, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
don't forget in MW2, fans were commenting that the rear flip up sight on the SCAR was backwards and would back towards the shooter and not forward. IW didn't change it cause they don't care of the little details. Also I like to see a game where they have a random chance to destroy your optic so can you actually can flip up your irons. After the EMP in MW2, they forgot that pretty much all the M4s and SCARS had flip up sights but none of them bothered to flip them up. That'll be the first thing I noticed when I aim or the fact that the ACOG is not electronic and would still work when an EMP hits. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 19:43, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let's not forget MW2 is the same game which showed the Model 1887 being reloaded by having every cartridge put into the barrel. Would certainly make for an interesting first shot... [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 19:58, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In the words of the Demo Man from ''[[Team Fortress 2]]'', &amp;quot;Ka-BOOM!&amp;quot; :P [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 20:18, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New behind-the-scenes footage reveals that there are partial reload animations --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 20:16, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked how ''[[Project Reality]]'' completely replaced the M16/M4 reload animation from ''BF2''; the only time the charging handle is messed with is when you first bring the weapon up, and even then it's more of a brass check than a full pull back. The reloading animation has you swap the mags, hit the bolt release, and check the ejection port. Much more realistic reloading animation. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 07:03, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I wish is adding different animation for reloads. If you are in the middle of an intense fire fight, you reload and press the bolt faster and you randomly fumble with your reload cause it happens. Or if the firefight is over, you do a more slow reload. Also if the gun has flip up sights, I want to see an animation where you actually flip those irons up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:02, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think I'd be happy with the former; same as random jams or giving singleplayer enemies a chance of getting an instakill headshot on the player, it isn't much fun having the game secretly flipping a coin to decide if you get screwed or not. ''Black'' did slower reloads if you weren't being fired at, though; it either sped the whole animation up or skipped the unnecessary wanking around if you were being shot at when you pressed reload. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:50, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing about leaving the front sight post on the M4s is that the red dot sight is raised and not like in COD4 where it is mounted on the rail. Maybe in real life, having 2 eyes would sort of work, but even then you can still have a front post bother your eye looking at it. It wouldn't be a clear shot [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:04, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only game I've seen that gets it all right is Crysis 2, and the weapons are all fictional, though they could all easily exist. It's got both reload animations (six actually, because you do them different in Armour or Stealth mode), +1 in the chamber, attachments on your gun based on where they're mounted (one optic, a suppressor or no suppressor, and an underbarrel), believable damages based on calibres, functioning pistol hammers, and pistol slides that lock back when empty and not as part of the reload animation (meaning you can run around and stuff with a locked empty pistol). [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:02, 16 March 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the left on the bridge an enemy soldier have a Pkm machine gun :&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Battlefield3_Gogogo.jpg (high resolution sorry) [[User:Arrak|Arrak]]&lt;br /&gt;
:PKP&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disable Vehicles == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info at Kotaku and others mentions &amp;quot;Temporarily disabling vehicles&amp;quot;. I'm thinking it may be some sort of EMP thing, though, even for BF that's a stretch. What would be preferable, is if for instance... a tank... had several parts that were damageable. Things like treads, optics, engines, etc could be disabled in order to halt a tank. Same goes with tires and stuff like that with other vehicles. This'd be really cool in my opinion, for instance, snipers could damage the optics of a tank with say a .50 BMG round, temporarily of course. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:23, 3 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 Carry Handle Fix ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If anybody's seen the EA PWNED BF3 episode, it looks like they've added the carry handle to the M16A4. Two short clips demonstrating the ANT animation system that show the M16A4 with it. Good stuff. Also, did anyone notice how they're making prone realistic? It seems they're having the player's elbows be fixed rotateable spots along with the player's spine being able to bend a certain number of degrees. In order to rotate around, the player has to physically crawl over to view that area. It's easy to see in the animation demos that I referred to, but it's also noticeable on the 12 minute trailer when the Marines are on the rooftop, watch the perspective of the player's weapon and how it moves in relation to the arms. Very cool indeed, because I know balancing prone has always been a problem with BF. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 09:15, 30 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiplayer Teaser ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there is a MP teaser up on www.origin.com, looks like they have gone and screwed the m4 up, (removed front site) [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:22, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't get a good enough look at the gas block to tell. Anywho... I spotted the M16A4, a Mk 46/M249, M9 pistol, the PKM Pencheng, SVD, Mk 11/SR-25 (Not a M110, no full URX rail), AKS-74, and the Grach pistol. All but the SVD and Grach are viewable in the trailer, the AKS-74, SVD, and Grach are visible in the corner where it lists the kills. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:36, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-battlefield-3/714884 pause at 0:19 for the M4, [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:42, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The AKS-74U screenshot shows what appears to be an enemy carrying two [[RPG-7]] launchers. Can't tell if they have optics or straight iron sights. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 14:56, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who put the Mk 11 as the 9A-91? Travesty, stoked that the Mk 11 is in though. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:30, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This photo was posted on battlefields facebook page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that while the US gets an M-4A1 with and without optics, the Russians/PLR get an AK-74M.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:54, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might've just been the loadouts they had for E3, doesn't necessarily confirm faction specific weaponry. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:00, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that PSO-1 or the same unidentified sight from Medal of Honor? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They modelled receiver lid locking knob wrongly. Should be like [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/708/i-711.jpg this]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physical Warfare Pack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New weapons, folks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.totalgamingnetwork.com/content.php?4305-Battlefield-3-Limited-Edition-Physical-Warfare-Pack-Available-for-Preorder-in-UK Battlefield 3 Limited Edition: Physical Warfare Pack Available for Preorder in UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time for article update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:08, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I see they're calling it the DAO-12 again. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:14, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Type 88 (and it seems the Bipod is an attachment), &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; lol, with Flechette ammo, aaaaaaaand... a Flash Suppressor for the &amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle&amp;quot;!!!! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:44, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle?&amp;quot; So we're set in California? Watch out, the bad guys have high-capacity 15-round magazines! [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:56, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isn't the SKS 10 rounds though? I never really liked the look of the SKS, but I've seen a lot of people on this site post about wanting it in a game for once, so it'll make all them happy :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:37, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm just talking generally; you know, scary handguns with high-capacity magazines and laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings and gangland bayonet charges. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:45, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Haha, yeah, I'm from Canada, and while we don't actually have as strict laws as, say, California, what we have is lots of paperwork and time spent training for licenses, etc. Making them harder to get and needing more knowledge about them is way better than just banning them. I never understood that, oooo, a bayonet mount, oh no! A pistol grip? They'll kill us so much more efficiently now! Criminals use illegally bought weapons that aren't registered. And that guy that comes home to find his wife is cheating on him? He's so mad he'll kill both of them, and they think he won't just get a knife or something? I'm not supporting killing people, but people would still do it even if all the firearms on Earth went away. We were pretty damn good at it for the thousands of years before we invented them... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:36, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Agreed :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:26, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still no update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:16, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings' - I lol'd --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:11, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why in the hell would they make the SKS a 'Sniper Rifle'? I mean calling the Dragunov a true sniper rifle is pretty much... wrong, I'm okay with it though, but an SKS? &lt;br /&gt;
I'll admit I'm not very experienced with the SKS myself, maybe it's a tack driver in disguise, but from what I've heard it's just a little more accurate than your standard AK47 and that's not saying much.... --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:56, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well there are only going to be semi-auto sniper rifles, so really, there are only DMRs anyway. It's not like it's a sniper class, it's a recon class, so that's not missnamed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:59, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Source? There's no way they'd make all the sniper rifles semi-automatic. We've only seen semi-automatics, yes, but there's no confirmation that they'll -all- be semi-automatic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:09, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I got out of the Recon description here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/08/battlefield-3-at-e3-roundup.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-auto and C4. That could just mean default, and you still get bolt-actions and the mortar later, but I really think they mean they removed both of those, to balance the issues with those two things in BC2. Everyone uses Recon, everyone hides with a one hit kill sniper rifle, and everyone calls in their magic mortars from anywhere onto anything. It looks like they're trying to make the Recon kit more of a DMR kit than a true sniper, which is probably better, it fits the squad play better as a DMR and a support gunner do the same job, one with high amounts of precision, the other with high amounts of ammo. On a different note, I'm pretty sure the M4A1 will be in the engineer kit because it has a flashlight and will be the counterpart to the AKS-74U, like the M16A4 and AK-74M. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:36, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: They meant at the E3 demo, the Recon class has a semi-automatic sniper rifle. At the E3 Demo. Hence the &amp;quot;E3 Roundup&amp;quot; title, it's not dismissing anything, just saying what they saw at E3. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 21:47, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:12, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249 SAW is actually Mk. 46 Mod 0? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By looking at the handgurads, I noticed that they are sticking out like the Mk. 46 Mod 0's handguards instead of the flat M249 SAW's heatshield. Also, because the weapon is fitted with M145 ECLAN scope, this could be the same model as in Medal of Honor, only it is rendered differently or something like that to fit Battlefield 3's engine. So, could be? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:54, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yep, it's for sure the Mk 46. Though, it's all one nacho. Glad with the weapon choices they're going with so far. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 10:34, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Glad to see the M145 MGO, presumably in place of the ACOG. Nice touch. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:13, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yep, there's also some speculation that there'll be multiple types of 4x optics for each weapon, like you could put the Elcan on an M4. But I think it's more likely that each weapon will just have a different model of ACOG-type optic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:27, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's the case, I'm putting the ELCAN on the M16A4, and if there's camo I'm making it green :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Canadian, eh? :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the screenshot is too low to tell if it's an M249 or a Mark 46. The key difference between the two is that the M249 has a magazine well on the side of the receiver for using M16 mags, but the Mark 46 doesn't. You can't really tell if the SAW in this game has a mag well or not. I also want to point out that the SAW in MoH has a magazine well, which would make it an M249. ;) [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:06, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P90 in IGN preview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/117/1172554/battlefield-3-20110606090440594-000.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the magazine looks like its either missing or modeled way to small&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/117/1172554p1.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sorry i dont know how to embed an image [[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:54, 10 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's a clear model error...the magazine is lodged inside the weapon at an angle and the charging handles are floating above the magazine in midair.&lt;br /&gt;
however, the magazine looks like its of appropriate size and its transparent....would be a nice touch if the bullets inside would actually be visible and move.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May perhaps point to an extended magazines type system, though you'd expect the studio to realise that the P90 feeds from the rear so this wouldn't function --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:09, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are Extended Magazines, you can see them in the loadout window in some of the E3 footage on a PKP Pecheneg. But, what the P90 is likely, is just a pre-alpha mess-up. The magazine is there and properly sized, its' just angled downward into the weapon/barrel. It's not married properly to the P90 and is likely just a glitch that will be fixed. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:29, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, pretty cool that things such as extended magazines have made it into BF3 --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:22, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the latest video where the M4A1 had a holo-sight and the gas block was removed. Looks like this will be just another unrealistic game after all. But at least the character pressed the BCRB instead of pulling the charging handle. Damn it, when will a new Rainbow Six game come out?! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:38, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not a big deal. The M4A1 still kills people and looks great. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:47, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I might be a bit annoying to have every game M4 lose its gas block, but it really doesn't matter THAT much, and it makes the scope view clearer. To say that it will be &amp;quot;just another unrealistic game&amp;quot; because of that is silly, just pretend it has one of those super mini gas blocks, you wouldn't even be able to see it anyway. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:57, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The problem is that I don't want to have a clear view because soldiers do not have clear view ALL the time. And there is a nice little thing called &amp;quot;flat-top riser&amp;quot;. One might wonder why was it invented.... - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 17:07, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But they're ugly and no one uses them. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:45, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if removing gas block was optional and made gun bolt-action. Talk about killing with skill :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bolt-action sniper rifles will be usable without scopes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Continuously updated) This video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwT6x7zEQ8c) shows on the kill-feed that the SVD makes a return for Battlefield 3 at 2:20. At 3:48 you see an enemy in the engineer class holding what appears to be an RPG-7 at 3:48. The kill-feed shows at 4:06 a MP-443 pistol. Clear look at an RPG-7 with on the back of an enemy soldier with the rocket (quite dangerously) inserted at 6:03 and again at 7:23. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 16:32, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Team Specific Weapons? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the AKS-74U pictures it looks scarily like that's a US Marine using it on Spetsnaz. As far as I know there'll be unlockables and selectable weapons, but does anyone know if these are team specific or not? I'm personally pretty worried we're going to have a bunch of marines in state of the art gear running around with AK rifles because a bunch of bars say they're the best, or PLR using M4s and 249's, that's as bad, if not worse. --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 17:26, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's only in MP, it's the same as Bad Company 2, I never liked being restricted to team weapons im MP. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The player could've picked the weapon up... We don't know for sure about faction specific loadouts. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 23:54, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally liked the faction specific loadouts in BF2, it was realistic. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:40, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:True, to be honest I'd be happy either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:49, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope they bring back faction specific weapons from Battlefield 2. Medal of Honor made it right at first but then you got the opposing faction's guns and faction-specificness pretty much lost its purpose :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But in BF2 if you killed a enemy you can pick up his &amp;quot;kit&amp;quot; and use his weapons... - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:08, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, first you had to kill an enemy, then you could pick his stuff (kit). But for Battlefield 3 it should be weapon (more realistic than insta-crossdressing xD ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your right, lol. XD - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:25, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually in BC2 your character model never changed when you swaped kits, you could have a medic carrying a sniper rifle, or a ghillie guy with an RPG-7. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah right, I forgot. :\&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lol, you forgot about rocket launcher-wielding snipers ;) Hey, we should put a pic of that under the rocket section or something, you know, just for kicks. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:05, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::lol yeah. The reason I don't remember is because I only played with bots, I only had Dial-up back then. u_u - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:34, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope its not side specific, I always hated that considering how two weapons from the same class where completely different and handled different. Most people would end up using unlocked guns that you can use on either side. If you want a game thats realistic as possible, play Operation Flashpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a fan of Battlefield 2, which featured faction specific weapons, I'm offended someone is saying me to play another game. I might as well say: If you want a game thats unrealistic as possible, play Call of Duty. By the way, in Medal of Honor opposing factions' weapons had identical stats, so that wouldn't be a problem for Battlefield 3 (probably). Also, sign your posts (paragraphs?) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well since OpFor is using a AK-74M and AKS-74U which is some-what comparable to the M16A4 and M4A1, I say the game is gonna be fairly balanced. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: If they use weapon balance from MoH then yes. Because in BF2 M16A2 and M4A1 kinda sucked (better use G36E and SCAR-L unlocks, respectively). However AK-101 and AKS-74U were ''nice'' (damage)! Check their stats here: [http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison BF2 Weapons Comparison] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^^But those games kinda sucked (at least Dragon Rising, Red River looks good). :\ Whatever, I personally like faction specific weapons for my reasons above. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:27, 22 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be honest, Dragon Rising didn't suck, it was just buggy and laggy (which can be said about pretty much every other shooter, at least as start) and didn't have weapon customization (which can be said about Battlefield 2). In my opinion it is Red River which sucked, basically being Co-op CoD:MW with Visible Walls of Block being replaced by Invisible Walls of Doom and auto regeneration being replaced by manual healing. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Meh, that's why I said ''kinda'' sucky, lol I heard AAII is much worst, as its severely buggy and lacks weapon animations and others. P.S. I prefer manual healing over mutant regenerating health any day, the only place 3 second regenerating health belongs is a Wolverine game. :\  - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::To be honest, manual healing in Red River isn't ''that'' much different from auto regeneration: hold &amp;quot;use&amp;quot; key while not getting hit and several seconds later you are good to go. Whether Dragon Rising had an actual Medic class just like Battlefield :) Oh, and it's kinda hard to make complex game without ''a lot'' of technical problems and unfinished things, yes ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if you want actual realism at this point, you go ArmA 2, not Operation Flashpoint: We-screwed-over-an-already-great-franchise-by-making-a-game-with-casual-gamers-in-mind[[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 03:06, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want actual realism at this point, you go to Army. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh, But ArmA II had NO weapon animations, that's kinda a big &amp;quot;unfinished thing&amp;quot; when you publish the game! And you Mr. Masterius, your obnoxious, why don't ''you'' go join the Army. We're talking about wanting realistic combat games not what peoples career decisions should be. -_-  [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:04, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Wolf, one thing you should realise: until Virtual Reality is created and gone into mass production, games will never, NEVER be trully realistic. Holding gun in your hands =\= Mouse+Keyboard. Also, mine is not obnoxious, mine is very nice and tidy :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:36, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::::And what's so wrong with wanting realism in &amp;quot;Mouse+Keyboard&amp;quot; games? Also I have handled, extensively trained, and fired many REAL firearms, so I'm not just some armchair-commando or a mall-ninja. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:18, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eventually FPSs will be the player wearing a mocap suit with a mocap gun, in a mocap room with a floor that moves (like a treadmill) so you can run places. And you will be forced to reload the weapon properly etc. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The first steps are made :D [http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/xio-ultimate-fps-virtual-reality-gaming-exoskeleton-prototype-video-21-04-2011/ XIO Gaming VR Simulator Prototype] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:54, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd settle for having a decent field of view, right now. They're actually getting narrower rather than wider as the gun attempts to colonise roughly a quarter of the screen. Kinda sad when the guy in ''Doom'' held his pistol in a more sensible way than the guy in ''Crysis 2'' does; the latter seems to be holding it with the base of his right palm rested against his nose. Sure, we're not all going to own an IMAX globe theatre any time soon to have a full 180 degrees or so of vision, but it gets silly when your FOV is ~30 degrees these days when most of the old shooters did 70-90. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed your post? Maybe we both tried to edit at the same time, because it wasn't there when I did, sorry about that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:34, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol @ me. Should have known someone was going to say that... Should have added &amp;quot;In a Video game&amp;quot;... [[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 08:00, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Right 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:51, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's alright, danke. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:31, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More Stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe. I didn't see anything listed here that we don't have, but they seem to know what they're talking about. (Near the bottom)&lt;br /&gt;
http://enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:17, 4 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett MRAD/98B spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the &amp;quot;Classes Explained&amp;quot; screenshot...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x80/cowboyw54/Bf3render.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:07, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool, I'd never heard of that rifle before, looks like a good addition. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like they call Picatinny Railed M16A4 '''M16A2''' ''again'' *facepalm*. Oh, and that's a weird sniper rifle. Don't they have '''M110''' for that?&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. And yeah, same goes for '''DAO-12''' (Armsel Striker, duh!). But I would prefer '''Armsel Protecta''' (it's more modern after all ;) ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:01, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually they are calling it '''M-16a2'''... nuff said! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 05:14, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it was called &amp;quot;Blarg Rifle&amp;quot; but had correct reloads, I'd be happy. Where did it say they called it an A2 anyway? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:03, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg here] [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 07:50, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, well, it might say &amp;quot;M-16a2&amp;quot;, but it calls the MRAD a &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; Sniper Rifle, so, we'll see. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I think that the &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; is the Mk II Mod 0 (SR-25), and that they just threw the text on there because the Mk II will be the default Recon rifle. &lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I think this 99% confirms that it will be in the game, should it be added to the main page?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:28, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OH Mk.11, I thought it said Mk.2, and I couldn't figure out what the hell that would be. Yeah, we've seen the SR-25 already in that multiplayer footage, and everything in that video was default. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:05, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So MoH had the M110 when it should have had the Mark 11, but BF3 now has the Mark 11 when it should have the M110 (USMC recently dropped the Mark 11 in favor of the M110)? *Facepalm* [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:27, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed. Another thing about MoH is that apparently Mark 14 Mod 0 got finished in 2003 and got shipped to Navy SEALs in 2004[http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=377] thus making it as chronologically incorrect as M110. Devs usually tend to skip the details. Still, the crown of ignorance goes to CoD brand. The latest MW3 seems to have customized AK-47 *Major Facepalm* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:39, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes about in-game ACOG scopes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there seem to be two separate models of ACOG scopes available in the game, according to the screenshots posted in the article. The M4A1 carbine the player character uses in the 'Faultline' trailer is fitted with a camo-painted TA01NSN ACOG(identifiable by the integral iron sights and lack of a fiber-optic strip along the top) while one of the M16A4's shown in first-person view in the article here is equipped with a TA31F ACOG. This is the second FPS game I've seen to do this, the other being ''[[Project Reality]]'' (itself a mod of ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', coincidentally) which has the TA31F and TA31RCO ACOG models available in it. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:44, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...While in the average FPS, you're lucky if the thing called the ACOG looks like anything in Trijicon's product line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:47, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Making the public in general think every scope is called an ACOG :P Also, in terms of 4x sights, theres the M249s ELCAN, and I'm hoping you can put any optic on anything. One of the DICE guys said there's a crazy amount of optics in BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:26, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even in COD: Black Ops (a game that takes place in the 60s mind you) they have a scope called a ACOG, even though it's obviously ''not'' a ACOG *rolls eyes*. Game Devs are becoming fails more and more every year. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Treyarch basically made their own Modern Warfare, with blackjack and hookers. So yeah, forget about proper portray of Cold War. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:41, 13 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Give me the ability to slap the Elcan onto the M240 and I will be happy. Hope what you said about the 'crazy amount of optics' turns out to be true. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:34, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope you're not confusing the ELCAN scope with the similar M145 MGO. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are correct, I did mean the MGO. I know the M145 is different, I just though the Elcan name was interchangeable. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 13:15, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It would be nice to see a broader array of optics customizations in FPS games. ''Project Reality'' has a pretty good variety, but you have to switch out your entire class loadout in order to change this, and most weapons only have 1 or 2 optics available aside from iron sights (the M4A1 has the widest variety; having available EOTech, M68 Aimpoint, Kimber Mepro, &amp;amp; ITL MARS red dots as well as both TA31F &amp;amp; TA31RCO ACOGs as mentioned above). [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, that Project Reality has been mentioned... I hope DICE won't disappoint the CIS players, so that we can kick yer capitalist arses in proper way... j/k lol :P Anyway, here are the articles for those interested: [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/1P29 for AK-74M] and [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/PKP for PKP]. And the [http://www.npzoptics.com/catalog/sights_for_small_arms/ full catalog]. Oh, and it's been suggested on [http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-3/1405448-optics-lots-optics-2.html#post19418223 EA's Forums], so I don't have to do it myself. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:24, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mocap Guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a challenge for everyone; what are the two wire guns standing in for?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2nd Story&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or if it's off the list after a while:&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab1.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab2.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cornershot and a Thompson with M203? :P [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:lolz. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:51, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More seriously, that thing McNab has is definately supposed to be a carbine with an underbarrel accessory, I can't really see what else it could be. The other guy's weapon is a bit more of a mystery; since it doesn't have any kind of projection for a magazine, I'd guess it's something like a Bizon; can't be a P90, these rigs are for capturing hand positions and his would be completely wrong for that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, actually it does have a magazine, I see a curved MP5-style mag just in front of his finger. So, maybe it's an MP5 with some underbarrel device making the front end all chunky, or one of those MP10 things like in GTAIV. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:40, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOL Tommy with M203 :) The one on the right really looks like an M14 EBR to me, the mag, handguard, and barrel, but the other one is weird. It looks like an MP5 pistol grip and mag, with a really bulky front, and a stock that looks familiar, bu I just can't place. :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:09, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://riflestocks.com/store/product2.html ACE side-folding skeleton stock]? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:48, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that's the one! Hmm, is there anything in particular that's on, aftermarket or otherwise? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Quick google gets me mostly AK-pattern weapons. AK, Saiga, Galil, that kind of thing. Couple on MACs, not that it's likely to be one of those. Maybe that's what a MoCap AKS-74U looks like? :s [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'd say that's the best guess so far [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:13, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno, such a stock shape reminds me of [http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:G36.jpg G36E] which was in Battlefield 2 (with railz instead of optics). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not sure about that, you'd have thought if it was G36E the mocap prop would have a rod or something stuck to the end to represent the rest of the barrel like the one McNab has. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Bah, I am not really into guessing the gun by the mocap. Details of it - OK, but generally it's just a mishmash that can be used for anything provided the grip is adequate xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:51, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually the ACE stock is found on the SPAS 15 as well (which was in Bad Company 1, and Battlefield 2 I think) probably the most likely choice. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:48, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope it's that, that was the ONLY weapon that didn't come back in BC2 for some reason. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But it returned in [[Battlefield Play4Free#Franchi SPAS-15|Battlefield Play4Free]] so its appearance in BF3 is possible ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 23:20, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 unlock spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... in a promotional shot from Dice about their Battlelog service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x599/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:02, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was also seen in the EA Pwned video, along with the G3 (mentioned), I forgot to add that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:06, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I hope this Glock 17 actually holds... well... 17 rounds. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:24, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the MP-443 does, so that could work, I'm thinking there's gonna be a Euro faction, with the Glock as the sidearm, and we've also seen the P90. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:17, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now that reminds me... Battlefield 2: Modern Combat (console version of Battlefield 2) had [[ Battlefield 2: Modern Combat#Glock 17 Pistol|Glock 17]] as Euro Sidearm :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:44, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It did? Awesome! I was just guessing, but that basically confirms it :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:54, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here's some leaked gameplay for you guys, skip to 1:44, there's your Glock. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfeOoEDYEt0) Would appear that the sidearms (at least) are not faction specific. Also looks like it holds 18 rounds but I'm assuming this is a '+1' affair. [[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:00, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Melee Animation is good :D Reloading after every bullet isn't :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha Footage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
no doubt some of you have heard there is a closed alpha trial going on, and some of you may have watched the leaked footage online. i dont want to post links to these videos just incase its not aloud.&lt;br /&gt;
but i can tell you, that the G36c, Glock 17, M27 IAR, SV98, MP7 and M1014 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:24, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Closed Alpha? Any news about Closed Beta for MoH: Limited Edition owners? It should be before Open Beta, shouldn't it? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A pretty nice selection of weapons appearing which is good to see, particularly the M27. Now just need someone to spot the L85 and I'll be happy \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:19, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess it, Russian counterpart to M27 is going to be RPK-74M :O And British - L86? ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You may possibly be right, and I hope you are. If it's in there, first person to deliver the information wins a shiny medal from myself :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::looks like US support starts with the M27, and the Russians start with RPK, british forces arent in the game... --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 13:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The existence of other factions hasn't been denied (to my knowledge) but even so I hope either weapon is available --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 15:02, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Germans aren't in the game and there's a G36C. We can't rule anything out. Plus, there's always the possibility of DLC. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 19:31, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::New factions/weapons added via DLC would be grand. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:50, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Yeah, like they did with Euro Forces Pack for Battlefield 2 :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've yanked the images off the page; as with the MW3 stuff, posting images from leaks is not allowed. Wait until they show up in something official. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why does it even matter? We should post everything about everything we know... :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:36, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Same reason we don't allow pirated or leaked movie footage; using that kind of thing reflects badly on the site. We can wait until these weapons are confirmed in official materials (which they will be in due course, I'm sure), we don't need to go using dubious sources. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:39, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, for a sec it slipped my mind that once the game is out we will have everything :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And there are still screencaps from leaked version :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Which ones? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:30, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The ones added by Gran28 - check page history. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:41, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, I thought where he said &amp;quot;Paris gameplay video&amp;quot; he was talking about a gameplay video released at some show in Paris. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:49, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The ones that I added was from a gameplay trailer released by DICE yesterday I think.--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 08:04, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Ah, if that's so, then my bad. Kinda hard to separate official ones from current leaks. Better mention that on the talk page :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:28, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Official MP Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emwEknzmyRo &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
can see a M4 with a Eotech and a Acog, and the front site is in when optics are attached.--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:32, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible return of the NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MgQMoPwGwM&amp;amp;feature=related and around 1:13-14, I thought I saw the pattern found on the straight mags that the 7.62mm NATO variant of the NDM-86 uses.&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Okay at 1:15 at the maximum quality, I could clearly see that magazine is straight.  This is no SVD guys, no SVD. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 18:09, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good spot, wouldn't have noticed that myself. I wonder why they opted for the NDM-86 instead of the SVD? I assume the SVD is harder to get in Sweden meaning the studio had to find an alternative. Is it still labeled as an SVD within the game? --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is, and it was in MoH. You know, I think MoH was like a super pre-Alpha version of this game, there's and MP7 too, and a few others. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:03, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope DICE do a better job on BF3 than they did on MoH, that game was shocking. There's probably some truth in that though :P --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 20:43, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well, MoH multi was made by a small team from DICE in 6-7 months, and ALL of DICE has been working on BF3 for, like, 5 years, I'm not worried ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Fair play to them but you'd have thought issues with the game would have been patched following the game's release. Still, I don't deny that BF3 will be a far better game however I'm sure some of the issues from MoH will poke through. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, we can hope the issues that poke through don't include those godawful skyboxes that MoH had. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:26, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE deliberately sabotaged MoH MP 'cause they were focused on BC2... :( But it is said that MoH 2 is being developed solely by DC. And it is rumored that MoH 2 will have Frostbite 2 Engine :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:50, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would be interesting to see what DC do with the Frostbite 2 engine, I wasn't all that impressed with the single player but taking into account that (as far as I'm aware) MoH was the studio's first game, it was an adequate effort. Was better than the multiplayer at least, in my opinion. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 07:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've always said that if MoH's MP was the same as it SP, then the MP would be awesome, I have it just for the SP :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:35, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just played some more of SP and I have to say I agree, pretty intense stuff. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:38, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just noticed that all of the US weapons are Armalites, and all of the Russian weapons are Kalashnikovs, it's cool. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aside from the 'SVD' which isn't a Kalashnikov design, but we'll forgive you as it is outwardly similar. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but you got the point ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/sniper/sn18/svd_clones.jpg SVD Clones]. The third one is AK modified to SVD. Ain't Russian guns :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do like the fact that each faction has it's own starting weaponry, I always liked that about BF2 (though I didn't play it much) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:25, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can't find the video, but I'll post a link: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7447261.page [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:31, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 22:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sniper Rifles can have iron sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yup. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:04, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmmm. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:56, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to tell because of the screwed up animation in the alpha, but you load a round into the chamber first, then the tube. EDIT: This is a good thing, I made sound like it wasn't :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It fires semi, burst, AND auto, one of those fancy 360 degree fire selects or something :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Alpha Gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the gameplay, I noticed that the front sights are still present when optics are attached, that M16A4 is now burst-fire and that the US LMG is called M249 in-game. Bipod gameplay was shown too. I also spotted the M-416 at 0:55, maybe the M4A1 equivalent of the enemy forces? [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:45, 24 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, yeah, they made it so the front sight is there, but disappears when aiming, the M16 has burst as well as auto (and semi), and the HK416 is an unlock, ONLY the default weapons are faction based, anyone can use unlocks, but the default ones might be usable by anyone later or something though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's still much better than the MW games. Boy, you complain more about games than I do. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:19, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Defaults faction / unlocks not is how BFs 2 and 2142 worked, too. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:08, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not complaining, I actually like the front sight disappearing system, if it's not there the gun wouldn't work, but if it was, then having an RDS would give you a better field of view. The M16's fire modes aren't too bad, as long as the weapons have the right ammo count, reload properly, and have +1 I'm happy. Things like the player loading it fancy or whatever are okay. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M320 Standalone confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
This. Search &amp;quot;BF3 Grenade Launcher&amp;quot;, and the vid has a G3 with an ACOG too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG 550 pretty much confirmed by Demize ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/30377608852017152 [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swiss weapon of choice 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Few Weapon Vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoU7uBNvP0&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LILgS-M2xo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's most everything in action, and with a few attachments. I love how the description for the M145 mentions the Canadian Army! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking good so far, spotted some people on my Steam friends list playing the alpha. So jealous. :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:43, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm looking very forward to this game. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Video Confirms new weapons for the game, as available in alpha build. In the first video we see an MP-7 PDW at 1:14, M1911 pistol at 1:57, RPK light machinegun on killfeed at 3:21, M27 IAR in killfeed at 6:12, M1014 shotgun at 7:34, G3 battlerifle on killfeed at 8:29, G36c assault rifle at 12:15, M320 grenade launcher on killfeed at 13:16. In the 2nd video we see RPK selection and model at 6:07 (usage following). Someone please update main page accordingly.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 15:32, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good of you to find everything, but leaked stuff isn't going on the main page :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:25, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: awww =(, thanks though.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 17:39, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sigh, The M145 uses the M4 reticle over the M249/240 reticle :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:47, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's the reticle my (standard version) ELCAN replica has on my airsoft C7A2, do you mean the M145 version is supposed to have a different one? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:40, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[http://www.dsarms.com/images/ELCM145M4W.gif Elcan M145 Optical Sight for M4 and M249/M240]. Remember people, this is just leaked Alpha and DICE will ''probably'' make changes to the game to make it right... Oh, and RPK :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh I see. And what do you mean, oh and the RPK? What's wrong with it? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:07, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Has the wrong bipod at the moment, doesn't look like the barrel is long enough to be an RPK either --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:31, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Well... since it has both synthetic furniture and curved magazine, it is [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg15/rpkm.jpg RPKM] (ignore the magazine color). However in-game description mentions that it uses 5.45x39 ammo, which is used in [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg16/rpk74_02.jpg RPK-74M] that is actually used by Russian Forces. So the point is, DICE should change the magazine model and rename the weapon to '''RPK-74M''' for Russians. That Militia can use whatever they want. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I didn't know that, so the curvature of the magazine in an AK/RPK-style weapon can be used to identify the caliber? DICE have clearly given alpha invites to the wrong people, should have gone to the inhabitants of IMFDB. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: :D And yeah. The curve gradation for Kalashnikovs' magazines goes as follows: 5.56 &amp;lt; 5.45 &amp;lt; 7.62, with 7.62 curve being particularly distinguishable ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::You learn something new everyday, now I can complain that the BF3 RPK is incorrect &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:33, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I sent Demize a tweet (I made a Twitter accout JUST to send him stuff) that the RPK should be either the RPKM or RPK-74M (as I can't see the mags well enough), and also sent him another one saying the G3 should be the G3A3 :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::That is dedication to informing the developer their game is wrong, well played. I also sent him a tweet concerning the M145's reticle. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:30, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Very good :D Two problems I've noticed about '''SVD''': First, as already been noticed, is that in-game model of magazine is straight NATO one instead of curved Russian one; second, is that in-game '''PKS-07''' is using optical PSO-1 based reticle instead of its own magnified reflex reticle like this one: [http://www.newphillysports.com/milsurp/pks07reticle.jpg]. And here information about it: [http://www.gunscollecting.com/english/scopes/pks-07-collimating-sight/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:24, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Just recieved an invite to the alpha, I am so stoked to try this game out \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:44, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:56, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 1911 spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just watched a video and the 1911 is back. This game's version appears to be the MEU model. I can tell from the slide, sights, and hammer. It appears to be the old model with the Springfield Armory slide. [[User:ShootingLiberal|ShootingLiberal]] 23:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't see the grips, but it appears to be a stock M1911 with a commander-style hammer (the round one, not the MEU one), a silver 3-hole trigger, and a silver barrel. Oh, after Googleing I found that that IS the original version of the MEU :/ http://www.justpistols.co.uk/meu_001.jpg That's an airsoft gun, but it's EXACTLY the one from BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:35, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, the MEU Pistol is currently designated [http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/24/m45-close-quarters-combat-pistol/ M45] Pistol ;) So maybe in-game it is some kind of customized M1911 Pistol? :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just got the invite for the Operation Metro Alpha and Will post info here if I can.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 20:53, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Awesome, that's two of us now :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So my impressions of the alpha so far are largely positive, not the biggest fan of the map however. Too many narrow corridors that you have to enter to advance, meaning that the defending team can plonk a SAW there and wipe you out as you enter the meat grinder. The weapons feel nice: Plenty of recoil meaning that burst firing is essential. Definitely an improvement gameplay-wise compared to BC2, which wasn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination. Looking forward to the beta now! \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Improvement compared to BC2, is obviously. The question is, improvement compared to BF2! :O--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can't really comment on whether it's better than BF2 as I haven't really spent much time on it (5 mins max) but it is a fairly solid FPS in it's own right. One thing that has bothered me thus far is 3D spotting, do not like it at all though, it should be changed for minimap spotting. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ah, in that case, if you still have BF2, I would recommend you download and install [http://www.realitymod.com/ Project Reality] mod, which focuses on realistic armed forces. There are people who have BF2 solely for it. And, it has British Army! :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yeah and the Canadian Army :D I'll be getting BF2/RM soon. Keep in mind this is one of the smallest map and it's meant to be more infantry focused, they'll be much bigger ones with more vehicles ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:10, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yup :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 29 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I hope that with more vehicles comes more teammates actually willing to take them out. No one playing engineer was even trying, just using their launchers on each other. Meant to ask if anyone still played BF2 as I was gonna get it in anticipation for 3, should organise some gamz. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:57, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I'm trying to get BF2 again, loved that game, can't wait to convert it to PR. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:04, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Needs a bit of polish but what I played of the alpha was a lot of fun, roll on October --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:32, 1 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Anyone have any questions about it? I'd be happy to answer them (as best I can) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:27, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Alpha weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/new-battlelog-screenshots-show-weapons-awards/battlelog-weapon-list/    - [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope, they will make new icons for AR-15 guns. These no-sights ones are just weird. Also, what I've said in &amp;quot;A Few Weapon Vids&amp;quot; --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:21, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The in-game ones have carry handles but I'm sure you knew this, I can live with a few slightly inaccurate icons on the Battlelog though. The M27 IAR had no front sight post for some reason in-game, made the Eotech pretty much essential. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:19, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doesn't it have flip-up sights? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:43, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It does, yes, but the front sight is missing the front sight post. As in, the sights are there, but the post is not. Made aiming quite tricky as you can imagine. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:34, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I'm assuming that's been fixed by now [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:15, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I hope so, was a nightmare. Still, barely used the RPK/IAR once the SAW was unlocked --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:44, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Cause the SAW's a real support weapon ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::^ This, though the fact that you can change the RPK and IAR to semi-auto was a nice feature --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:30, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Does IAR have better accuracy and SAW better firepower or SAW has ''both''? Because if it is the second one, IAR seems kinda... useless. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:35, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::For sure, the IAR/RPK are definitely more accurate than the SAW, the SAW is quite difficult to use at range without deploying the bipod whereas the other two don't have as much recoil. I assume the lighter support weapons are there for the more mobile, front-line support guy. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure this legit as another article is saying they're from OXM so should they be moved to the page and not discussion ? [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== why aren't confirmed weapons named? ==&lt;br /&gt;
such as the g3 ,m416 ,m27 iar and many more????&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can't put leaked stuff on the page, you'd know this if you read the rest of the discussion --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:21, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah thats why all the weapons used in the alpha were named in an official blog and yet there still not up here , so dont tell me i need to read the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do forgive me. Link to this blog? If it's legit you're free to edit the page if you wish. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:12, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I second the link request. Also, sign you posts. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:38, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(TOSSED)  RE-posting.  You guys should simply look up a bit next time. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that's not official blog. It's fanblog that also [http://bf3blog.com/battlefield-3-weapons/ makes assumptions] and [http://bf3blog.com/2011/07/battlefield-3-50-leaked-alpha-screenshots/ postes leaked stuff]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:55, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like I'm tossing that out the window. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:20, 4 August 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::An image which was leaked from the alpha, users of which were under a non-disclosure agreement which means we could get in trouble if we post it up here. Until we get an absolutely official list of weapons (most likely from future trailers and the public beta) the page will stay the same. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:27, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Setups ==&lt;br /&gt;
So what kinda weapons and setups do you guys think you're gonna use?&lt;br /&gt;
*Medic - G3 (or other BR) with a scope&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer - M1014 (or other shotty)&lt;br /&gt;
*Support - M249 (or other belt fed) with a bipod&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon - MP7 (or other SMG/PDW) with a suppressor&lt;br /&gt;
*Sidearm - M1911&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll probably play support mainly, it's what I spent 80% of the alpha doing and it's where I had the most fun. M240 with bipod, optic and flash suppressor will be my class of choice. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:29, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game''&lt;br /&gt;
:^ This --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:40, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PWNED #7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXaFw7aC9GE&lt;br /&gt;
A couple things I missed the first time I saw it, there's the M4, M1911, and G17, but also a Desert Eagle and MP5SD2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:17, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Desert Eagle? [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigNo NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What's up with the Desert Eagle? It's a perfectly good combat pistol *trollface*. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:11, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:22, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Developers really need to stop putting large caliber handguns and revolvers in supposedly 'realistic' games, it just feels stupid. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:38, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-oinyjsk0 I know what you're thinking. &amp;quot;Did he fire six shots or only five?&amp;quot; Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: &amp;quot;Do I feel lucky?&amp;quot; Well, do ya, punk?]'' --''Harold Francis &amp;quot;Dirty Harry&amp;quot; Callahan''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/revolver/1287756474.jpg .357 Magnum Colt Whitetailer], camper's wet dream :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:45, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their rack of guns at 3:06 (presumably airsoft for modelling purposes) contains an M14 and a FAMAS, might be 2 more to expect in the full game. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:00, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::M1911 + M14 = Old School Pack 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, I only thought to rewatch the range part, totally missed the FAMAS and M14 lol, good catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:15, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pre-order Spectact kits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/2/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila][http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/1/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some images of the exclusive Spectact kits you get via pre-order, you'll also notice that the Russian assault class soldier is holding an AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Guess American Assault class gets XM8. Both weapons lost their respective trials. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:20, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise its just art , and probably wont be ingame --[[User:LukeWilliams010|LukeWilliams010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, will wait for confirmation regarding these weapons. Maybe it's just false alarm (and Desert Eagle too). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nah, the AEK will most likely be in, and the AK-74M will go to the PLR faction. There's nothing official, but there's the AEK (RU) and 74M(PLR), SKS as a sniper (PLR), T-72 tanks (PLR), and MP lines recorded in English, Russian and Farsi, that's confermation enough. I've seen no evidence of the XM8, but who knows, they did say there's 10 times the unlocks as BC2... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:30, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Russian Forces clearly used AK-74M on Operation Metro map. The same is expected from final release. As for PLR, there are only silhouettes, and as such it's unclear which AK is used. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The AEK will probably be a universal unlock for all factions if it is indeed in the final game (which I believe it will be, doubt they'd use a weapon in artwork and not include it in-game) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:01, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There most likely will be no AEK in final game. Those renders showing specact skins are pretty dated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fair enough, I didn't know that. Not too fussed either way, not a big fan of the weapon. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 16:09, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please no XM8, at least not in the SP. If it's an MP only gun, I could care less whether it's in or not, though. I'm buying this for the SP, which I'm hoping will be at least semi-realistic. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:18, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I kinda doubt they will put in the XM8, I'd rather see a full-size G36. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:25, 15 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M16A3==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize99 tweeted that the M16A4 has been renamed to A3. Though we don't know if it still has all three modes, I'm thinking it doesn't. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:49, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm. Full Auto M16A4 seems more plausible to me than Picatinny Railed M16A3. Maybe call it M16A5? xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:57, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, the A3 is actually an A4 with full auto, I thought it was an A2-style for a long time, but looks it up, its hard to find good descriptions, but the A3 and A4 are the same except burst/auto. No one on this site gets that because this site calls every A3-style an A4 with an A2 lower. Why? Because that's what armourers built them with, since they don't have A3s. In games the weapon is whatever it's meant to be because it's not &amp;quot;built&amp;quot; on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:09, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, now that's funny. Turns out to be true[http://www.armyproperty.com/Equipment-Info/M16A3-A4.htm][http://world.guns.ru/assault/usa/m16-m16a1-m16a2-m16a3-e.html]. Silly 'mericans couldn't get hold of manual burst firing, Military Command had to enforce it for them :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:21, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hey, those are the two sites I found! I just couldn't find them again :P Anyway, look at the description on the first site, it's worded very old, saying things like identical to A2, but also same as A4. That's actually the most info I've seen on an A3 in one place, adding to the confusion, since there isn't good info around. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:16, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, Alex is wrong and so are the two websites Masterius linked to. The M16A3 is a full auto A2 (only used by SEALs and Seabees in very limited numbers), NOT a full auto A4. IMFDB policy is to identify a weapon visually, not by what the game calls it. In terms of A3 vs A4, the M16 in this game is intended to be an A4, so that's what it should be called. At least for the moment anyway. If it turns out the devs decide to axe the burst mode, we can classify it a C7A1, but until we know more, it should stay listed as an A4. I'm changing it back. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:11, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Uhm, Modern Firearms is respectable source. If you are claiming that it is not that means you have a better one? And the weapon can't be C7A1 since C7A1 is [http://world.guns.ru/assault/can/diemaco-c7a1-c7a2-c-e.html Model C7FT] (Railed Model 715 itself) and Full Auto M16A4 is [http://www.colt.com/mil/M16_2.asp Model 901] (Full Auto Railed Model 705 itself). And there are differences between 705 and 715[http://www.biggerhammer.net/ar15/variants/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now I want to know whether Demize99 tweeted about RPK and SVD... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The first A3s had A2 uppers, but were later (and still are) issued with railed uppers, that's where people get confused. A3 = Rail. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I do have a better source. It's called Defense Industry Daily [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m-16-rifle-purchases-04517/]. Additionally, if you take a look at the M16A2 section of the [[M16 rifle series]] page, it says the exact same thing. I also never said MF ''wasn't'' a respectable source, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's wrong in this case. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:25, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Other MIL-STD-1913 rails can be found on the front grips '''et. al.''' of the '''A3s''' and A4s, where they mount useful items like flashlights, laser pointers, grip pods, et. al.''&lt;br /&gt;
:There too. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:59, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Besides, why does it feature ''Wikipedia'' in '''Additional Readings'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Front grip&amp;quot; as in around the barrel, like a Knight's Armament M5 RAS. It has Wikipedia as an additional read because DID's article doesn't feature the M16 rifle's entire life story; Wikipedia does. In fact, why don't you take a look at Wikipedia where it states that the A3 is a full auto A2 and uses DID's article to verify it? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:07, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are a number of different rifles designated as the M16A3 by the US military. The first is what Wikipedia refers to, the Colt Model 646 which is also known as the M16A2E3, which was introduced in small numbers at the same time as the M16A2 and is an A2 with an A1 lower and was only used by the Navy and Coast Guard. Then you have the flat-top Colt Model 901 which was introduced at the same time as the M16A4 (in 1994 I think) which is basically an M16A4 with full auto rather than burst. The following is what the US army website says about the A3 and A4: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;The M-16A3 is identical to the M-16A2 but has a removable carrying handle that is mounted on a Picatinny Rail (for better mounting of optics) and is without burst control. The M-16A4 is identical to the M-16A2 except for the removable carrying handle and Picatinny Rail.&amp;quot; I would imagine that for modularity purposes the A3 in this game is the current version (Model 901).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:22, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, thanks, that really clears it up, so we could call the full auto A2 the M16A2E3, and the full auto A4 the M16A3, that makes sure they have different names, right? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Interesting, found [http://compass.seacadets.org/pdf/nrtc/cb1/14234_ch3.pdf information about M16A1 and M16A2E3] on [http://www.seacadets.org/ U.S. Naval Sea Cadet Corps website]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:31, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::That PDF is actually wrong, as it states that the M16A2E3 is burst fire rather than full auto. Here is the [http://www.scribd.com/doc/29272650/MIL-R-71135-Rifle-5-56MM-M16A2E3-1992 US Army Military Specification] for the M16A2E3 from 1992 (go to page 4, and look at the fire selector section). Although calling the earlier rifle the M16A2E3 takes away the confusion, it can still correctly be called the M16A3 as it was reclassified as this, kind of like how the M16A2 was originally the M16A1E1. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 06:11, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::True, I guess someone just got lazy and didn't give the flat top version a new name, so the 646 and 901 are BOTH A3s. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:47, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Editors probably made a mistake in ''that'' part because everywhere ''else'' it says automatic fire (right from the beginning). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:19, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, and after more searching: [http://www.military-today.com/firearms/m16.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:21, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I said, the very first A3s had A2 uppers, and after that they had rails. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:17, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Put it this way, the only times it says something about not having a top rail, it doesn't. What I mean is, it always says something really vague like &amp;quot;full auto version of the A2&amp;quot;, never mentioning specifics. I have not yet read somewhere that says that the A3 has a fixed carry handle, but have seen plenty that say the opposite. The problem was someone decided a long time ago that this site was for guns that are in movies only, not a gun wiki, so since the A3 is not in any civvie hands, and therefore not in any movies, it shouldn't be mentioned. All &amp;quot;A3&amp;quot;s in movies are A4s with A2 lowers, that is what the armourer used. However with the addition of newer weapons, and therefore newer entries, and the addition of games, where the guns don't really exist and therefore ARE anything, things are being added that never were before. Correct me if I'm wrong but the Mk.18 is only a military weapon, right? That means that, say, in the first Transformers movie Josh Duhamel's Mk.18 wouldn't have been a real Mk.18, but some Civvie M4 with a short barrel and such, made to look exactly the same as one. But that doesn't make it a Mk.18, however it IS listed as such. I may be wrong and it might actually be a Mk.18, but then Canadian C7-series is a better example: NO civvies have them. Period. But it still has an entry, as it is in Reality Mod, among a few others. Now we see the problem with not having an M16A3 entry: there might not be any in civvie hands, but there are some in games, like BF3, but COD4 singleplayer comes to mind as well, and I'm sure there are others. Hmm, I guess what this comes down to is we need an M16A3 listing on the M16 page. All of them should be listed, even if the only info is the name, a sentence about the weapon, and mention that it has never been in anything, otherwise we get stuff like everyone on the site getting false info about a particular weapon, and this happens. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That ''is'' specific. &amp;quot;Full auto version of the A2&amp;quot; means it's externally identical to the A2, but has fully automatic. I don't see how that's vague. If you've got a credible source saying A3s are &amp;quot;now issued&amp;quot; with flat top uppers, I'd like to see it. But if you look at the pattern of M16 rifle development, it's very likely that such a modification would bear a designation other than A3 (the only two exceptions to this in the platform's history were the Air Force's 11.5&amp;quot; barreled XM177s and when the Army dropped the Model 777 M4 for the Model 920 M4. Josh Duhamal used an M933 in Transformers, not a Mark 18. Mark 18-type carbines with 10.3&amp;quot; or 10.5&amp;quot; barrels can be had by anyone with proper licensing. But the reason we have Mark 18 mock-ups in movies listed as Mark 18s is because, like I already pointed out, it's IMFDB policy to identify the weapon on a visual basis. If it ''looks'' like a Mark 18, we ''call it'' a Mark 18 unless some other way of concretely identifying the weapon (such as an armorer ID) comes along. Your argument about civilian acquisition is a dead end since armorers like MPM are civilians, yet have fully automatic M4s, AK-47s, M60s, and so on in their possession. The only games I've played with full auto M16A4s are CoD4 and MoH, the pages for both of which identify the rifle as an M16''A4''. If you want an A3 category added, either take a look at the [[Talk:M16_rifle_series#Do_well_really_need_to_have_an_.22A2.22_and_.22A3.22_category.3F|M16 rifle talk page to see why it was deleted]] (where MPM himself states that the M16A3 has the same upper receiver as the A2) or come to the forum and state your case as to why said category should be reinstated. But as per IMFDB policy, the M16 on this page should be classified as an A4. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:14, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As soon as my problems with registration are solved, I'll bring this discussion to the light. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Bah. Is there any other way to contact forum administration other than through the forum? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Leave a message on [[User:MT2008|MT2008's]] talk page about it. He's an administrator on the forum. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:01, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Both M16s ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirms multiple M16s! I'm expecting the A3 and A4 obviously [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:05, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, that's pretty cool. =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:32, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's something I would like to take a look at in Beta :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He also confirmed not everything's in the Beta, but hopefully these two will be. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:22, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see very little point in including 2 M16 models, just takes up space that could be filled with something new :\ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The automatic one will probably be the starting weapon to balance it against another starting weapon, and burst fire one will probably be for everyone to use as an unlock. You see, so that to please everyone :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I gueessssss, suppose they don't have to remodel it or anything either, just change the weapon's code/animations. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:58, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think the A4 should be the starter and the A3 should be the unlock, makes much more sense to me. The starter ARs in COD4 were the M16A4 and AK-47 and that was just fine. Or maybe you can modify a base M16 into other variants. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:09, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I guessed it right: Demize has confirmed that M16A3 will be the default US assault rifle for the Assault kit[http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/102776416898265088] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:00, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gamescom trailers and official gameplay vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
We've got official footage for 2 weapons, one already known (MP-443), and one all-new (SCAR-H CQC with Grippod and Aimpoint optic).  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE .  In the Co-Op live gameplay from the devs, one of them picks up an unknown pump action shotgun with a 4+1 capacity.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:06, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice! Wonder if SCAR-L in? Oh, and they give civilian shotguns to military again! *shakes head* Already noticed that with M1014 before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isnt 2 m16 models , where do you get your info lol there is one the m16a3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== INCOMING ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/images/news3/fact_sheet2.jpg *kaboom*]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EA just released the fact sheet with all the weapons/attachments/specs listed, there's the weapon page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT:[http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=165281 and here's your proof] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:22, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that M39 the Finnish Mosin-Nagant? Or is there another battle rifle that uses the M39 designation?  Also, that list is missing the Groza bullpup AR that one dev caught one of the testers reloading.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:42, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 refers to the M14 variant used by the Marines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M39_Enhanced_Marksman_Rifle (this)]. And the Groza bullpup was actually the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-91 A-91] (not the 9A-91 from BC2... Russian weapon designations are confusing)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:56, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good find, kinda wish I hadn't looked at it though XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:11, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: AHAHAHAHA, &amp;quot;SCAR H CQB&amp;quot; made my day. But at least they wrote ACOG, not ACOG Sight, nor ACOG Scope. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:30, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That is what FN Herstal calls it [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=184&amp;amp;backPID=182&amp;amp;productID=10&amp;amp;pid_product=232&amp;amp;pidList=182&amp;amp;categorySelector=1&amp;amp;detail] though does it really belong in the carbines section? I would have thought it still belonged with the battle rifles. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:38, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::They call it CQC, C for Combat not B for Battle. But calling it CQB is still more correct than calling it simply SCAR-H, like in Modern Warfail 2, because that usually refers to SCAR-H STD, the one w/ the normal length barrel. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:47, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I see, fair enough. As you said though, at least they were slightly closer than some games. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:51, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, this does nothing to allay my fears about it being a generic AMURIKA V EVUL ARABS AND KOMMIES shooter. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:37, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, looks like y'all missed them calling it the M93R, rather than just the 93R like it should be. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:39, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A few things; first, it looks like this list is a little dated, as Demize confirmed both M16s, but even though details might have changed, I bet this is a 100% list. Second, remember this doesn't include stuff like the M320 (as it's a Gadget in terms of game), and mounted weapons. Third, I'm assuming the M39 (M14) will be semi only, as only it and the SKS are in the Battle Rifle section, with the G3 moved to Assault Rifles. Similarly, I'm betting the Glock 18 and Beretta 93R will be auto and burst only, otherwise the Glock 17 and M9 would be pretty useless. Fourth, notice that there is a P90 AND a P90TR. I'm thinking if you attach an RDS to the P90TR, it becomes the standard one, like COD4's MP5SD. Lastly, what's a T44 pistol? I did a quick search and all I got was this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/T44.jpg Oh, also, I'm totally using the M82 with irons, just for kicks :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm thinking the &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; might be the sidearm for Iranian forces, like the KH2002 will be their assault rifle. I don't know what it could be referring to, though; as far as I know, Iran uses P226 copies as their standard sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This looks ''really'' suspicious to me. No G36E (as was expected from BF2 (L85 too)), no SG 550 (as was confirmed by Demize), no multiple M16 (wasn't that said by Demize?), &amp;quot;Battle Rifles&amp;quot; actually being Marksman Rifle (M39) and Semi-Automatic Carbine (SKS), several weapons being ported from BC2 (AEK-971, A-91, PP-2000, Saiga-20K, MP-412) instead of BF2 (Bizon or Vityaz, Saiga-12K) for no reason; Beretta 93R and Glock 18 are actually law enforcement automatic pistols and will overshadow regular pistols... And T44? WW2 prototype gun being put in pistols?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; sheet was putted on [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/ official Battlefield Blog], I would have believed it. As of now I take it with a grain of salt. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:38, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The sheet lists an SG553 in the carbines section. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:14, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be like someone saying: &amp;quot;We want M4 in BC2!&amp;quot; and someone responded: &amp;quot;There is M16 there&amp;quot;. One weapon is assault rifle and other is carbine. They shouldn't cancel each other. Really. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, how exactly do you think the &amp;quot;straight pull bolt&amp;quot; under the weapon accessories could work? Either it will be some bullshit about somehow putting a straight pull bolt on bolt actions to increase ROF which will annoy the hell out of me, or I suppose it could be putting a straight pull bolt on assault/battle rifles to increase accuracy and turn them into sort of sniper rifles. Either way, I don't like it.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:32, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T44 is what they are calling the [[Taurus Model 44]] revolver.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:35, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, so the revolver unlocks are Russian .357 Magnum and Brazilian .44 Magnum... American .357 Magnum like Colt and S&amp;amp;W would have been more reasonable, honestly... But yeah, some wouldn't want revolvers in military shooters at all. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sigh, more revolvers. I'm assuming that the straight pull bolt will be for snipers as opposed to assault/battle rifles, either for bolt actions to increase ROF (even though straight pulls are supposedly more tiring than turn bolts) or for the semi-auto snipers for a bit more accuracy? Teeny tiny list of machine guns, sadface. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weapon Reloads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody seen the GamesCom Coop-Demo? I just noticed how the guy reloads his empty shotgun. First round into the chamber, all the following into the tube. I think they got it right this time. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 10:08, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't see that one, but I saw the M1014 reload in the leaked alpha footage, and it does do that :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:19, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Tactical pistol reloads too :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:30, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 Alpha Gameplay == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of Alpha gameplay videos on Youtube is insane, but in one of them I did see an MP7A1. Looked like the same model used in the Medal of Honor reboot. It was only seen for a moment, so hopefully someone can add more information? [[User:Miyazawa|Miyazawa]] 22:11, 18 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The MP7 is setup the same way as the MoH one, using the stock, grip, and pistol sights, but obviously has a proper empty reload. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tried to add the MP7A1 on the BF3 weapon listing underneath the submachine guns but someone keeps on deleting it. I havent uploaded an image from youtube because honestly I dont know how, can someone help out with this and stop deleting this post as the weapon IS CONFIRMED. [[User:Valant]] 2:58PM, September 9, 2011 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
: No, it's not. You're not allowed to post anything from the Alpha build. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 17:18, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Valant here reposting MP7 gameplay, and to reply YES I CAN post because most weapons you see on page from the alpha/PAX gameshows. In fact for the most part all of the weapons should be deleted because they are from the same build. I have provided a link to show first hand footage. Once the game is released and this is fact checked, the comment I left before  can be deleted. Here is the link again:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvvdBhH0r4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just not getting into your head, isn't it?  Screencaps from non-official/leaked footage are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.  SO yeah, it's nice and all that you're linking that in the discussion, but please DO NOT edit the main page again until beta comes out. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:51, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh REALLY? Because last time I checked there are several screen caps and images that are of some low quality camera taking a picture of a screen DURING ALPHA! Check the muther f*****g G36C section, or The UMP45, the AK74M, the DIO KH2002, and G3A3. These are all weapons from the same build of the game and these have pages, ergo the MP7 should have its own section. Now, im off to put the post BACK UP so suck it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are confusing Closed Alpha with NDA and Game Shows (Expos) intended for public. Those ones are categorised as Pre-alpha‎ (expos before Alpha) and Pre-beta (expos after Alpha). And you are just asking to get reported. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:03, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.....reported.....really....well then if thats the case as I posted on another MP7 related discussion below Ill wait till the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; news about it comes out&lt;br /&gt;
== Full Auto Carbine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Been reading and watching videoa and they all have the M4A1 listed as a carbine. Does anyone know if the M4A1 fires full auto, three round bursts, or a single shot when fired?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M4A1 is a carbine that is full auto or semi, just like real life, is that wierd? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbines ==&lt;br /&gt;
What makes me really happy is they got the term Carbine right; the M4A1 is an M16 Carbine, the AKS-74U is an AK-74 Carbine, the SCAR-H CQC is a SCAR Carbine, the G36C is a G36 Carbine, the SG553 is a SG550 Carbine, and, well, you could call the A-91 an AKM Carbine I guess. That's also why the relatively short HK416 is in the Assault Rifle section and not the Carbine one: it's not a Carbine. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:52, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Trivia Information''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL in addition to Assault Rifle and Carbine category, there is also so called Sub-Carbine category (that is, shorter than Carbine). Four of the above mentioned pairs have three guns in these categories (and three of these four pairs even have additionally Automatic Rifle/Light Machine Gun variant but that's a different story). And here is the list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M4 Commando &amp;lt; M4 &amp;lt; M16&lt;br /&gt;
:AKS-74U &amp;lt; AK-105 &amp;lt; AK-74(M)&lt;br /&gt;
:G36C &amp;lt; G36K(E) &amp;lt; G36(E)&lt;br /&gt;
:SG 553 &amp;lt; SG 551 &amp;lt; SG 550&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And to which category HK416 belongs, [http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/hk416_specs.asp depends on the variant]. Quite a list, isn't it? ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And while AKM didn't have official carbine (there was [http://www.red-alliance.net/forum/index.php?topic=11481.0 a prototype] and that's it), SKS can be considered one somewhat :P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe that was interesting to read :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:45, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Again... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's with the people using this &amp;quot;fact sheet&amp;quot; to clutter the main page with weapon titles. Can't they wait for more substantial material before adding stuff? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:02, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed; pages that are just lists of weapons without pictures or really any info look terrible, let's wait for them to show up. The people who care can find it here on the talk page, or Google :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Leaked info is not allowed, and entries with no pics or info aren't very much liked either. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:29, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^ Precisely. Official artwork, renders, graphical announcements (like that for Physical Warfare Pack, or Battlelog), screenshots, trailers, gameplay videos; screenshots made from official trailers and gameplay videos. All those things will do. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UMP==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can see it in a video from nvidia, the player to the right of the interview, you can see him using a UMP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
unkown what calibre, but im just gonna assume its UMP45 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:38, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==HK416==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
another video from nvidia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUyIIIKta44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if you pause at 0:30 it looks like the HK416--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:42, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M27 IAR, to be specific. Based on the HK416, yes, but not a normal HK416. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:25, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well the Hk146 is in, it appeared on the battlelog stat page. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 09:25, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weird Weapon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is that weapon the guy starts using at 2:24, in this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs ? It looks like an AS VAL, but that optic setup is weird. I wish they sticked to the real life russian optics, instead of creating rail-attaching versions. E.g.: The PK-AS (russian holographic) is actually offset to the left side of the gun, not aligned with the bore or mounted on a rail.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 08:20, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's quite hard to get hands on real Russian weapons in Sweden, so work is done with what's available... Oh, and PK-AS isn't holographic sight, it's reflex sight. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:56, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be the VSS. You can use iron sights on a sniper rifle so they might allow you to use reflex and holographic sights as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's no VSS, there's a VAL, but this guy's an Engineer, so it doesn't matter either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:14, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fact Sheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People, while it has been confirmed that the fact sheet is indeed official, it's also been confirmed that it '''IS NOT A FINAL LIST''', it only shows the equipment available '''SO FAR'''. So don't worry, I'm sure many more equipment options will come (I hope these include an MP5). [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 20:34, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, Demize wouldn't confirm whether the Karkand guns will be able to be used in standard BF3, but the way he said it seemed to hint they might, so I'm betting we'll see the MP5 and PP-19 Bizon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:26, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonzaga that's pretty much false hope , because there not going to release an official fact sheet and then add &amp;quot;many more guns&amp;quot; its not even wishful thinking its just stupid.and Alex when somethings is unconfirmed that doesn't mean its automatically going to be in the game, and if its anything like bfbc2 which it is, the guns will be seperate like the Vietnam expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: First, no need to call me stupid. And second, do you really think they can't add more stuff to the game 3 months away from the release? Not even the beta is out! Plus, by equipment I didn't necessarily mean more weapons. I guess you thought so because my example was a weapon.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:03, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did not call you stupid, I called your idea stupid.You really think that there going too add tonnes more &amp;quot;equipment&amp;quot; after they've released an official statement than that is stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's stupid here is you not signing your posts. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:06, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lol owned :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:47, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS has a plastic stock ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirmed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:36, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 full weapons list ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is up on official [http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ bf3 blog].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not the official blog. As it says in the description, it's a fan site. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:21, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, but it is news of an actual official announcement. --[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 00:00, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The announcement was leaked, meaning that the information it contains has no place on the main page. Until we get official imagery of each weapon, they should not be added to the main page. Just makes everything look a bit messy and half-arsed if you ask me. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:49, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About SVD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So were there any news from Demize or some official material released that confirmed that the magazine for SVD was fixed or not? Should it have been changed to NDM-86 on the main page? Only seen it in leaked Alpha (which ''could'' have been a temporal state, considering that SVU in BC2 had proper magazine (SVD and SVU use the same one), and this one probably ported from MoH for testing purposes). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:35, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battleblog #8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sig 553 and Strela/Igla launcher confirmed in a post on the official Battlefield blog [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/08/25/battleblog-8-build-your-weapon-of-choice.aspx] --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, suppressive fire with carbine :) And the modelled launcher is [[SA-7 Grail|Strela-2]] (NATO reporting name: SA-7 Grail) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thought as much, was the disk-shape thingy at the front that gave it away. &amp;lt;3 the weapon customisation that BF3 will offer though, gonna be awesome. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the primary indicator for Strela-2 is that, errr, under-barrel thingy with tube-and-spike shape while every other model is ball-and-tube. Here is a nice chart: [http://blueprintbox.com/watermark-gif.php?img=./data/media/384/sa-14-strela-gremlin.gif]&lt;br /&gt;
:::And yeah, customisation is great \o/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the bit I meant, forgive my extremely technical description XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:06, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, heh, right. Thought you meant the launcher tube itself :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:47, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incoming weapon modification options seem very exciting....lots of options to tailor your weapon to your specifics. However, the only detail about the blog that keeps me sceptical is the fact that you need to unlock every feature for each weapon individually. Knowing that from MW2 that would mean hours and hours and hours of playing with just one weapon to finally unlock the parts needed to tailor it to your specifics, only to then unlock the next weapon you've been longing for and then you need to start again from scratch with that weapon. Rather frustrating IMO. Would a better idea to make the modification parts a global unlock, so that once you unlock say supressors with an assault rifle, it counts for ALL other assault rifles too...same with LMG's, Pistols, Shotgungs, etc. [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:05, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
Found it; 2nd video, 21 seconds in. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:13, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link please? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 09:25, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OOPS, sorry, here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://ob-game.blogspot.com/2011/08/battlefield-3-three-videos-from-pax.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:57, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ummm you're wrong thats an mp412 , the scope also looks russian which gives it away&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually it doesn't look like the Mp412 at all or the T44, it looks a little different, take a look at this image I snapped of it&lt;br /&gt;
: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/687/mp412orcoltpython.jpg/&lt;br /&gt;
: To me it almost looks like a Colt Python from Black Op's, notice the iron sights, front and rear (the white markings) and the silhouette of the barrel and cylinder as well as the positioning of the grip, it's hard to say but my vote is towards a Colt Python. DICE did say they were going to add Faction specific weapons and if you look a little earlier the guy was using a Stinger. I'd think a Colt Python .357 Magnum would go nicely as a US analogue to the Russian MP412 .357 Magnum. Also to the Scope, it could just be a Russian style scope attached to a US weapon, they did say that the customization was huge so it's a possibility [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:47, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its an mp412 , if it was a python it would have grooves down the barrel housing which it doesn't its solid like the mp412 also I noticed the break action latch near the iron sight, which also corresponds to the mp412 , the python does not have a break open design. *Edit* also the colt python is not in the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The devs didn't say there isn't any other revolver in the game, thus shouldn't you, Persistent Mr. Anonymous. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:17, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, it's NOT a 412, but it could be a Python, some S&amp;amp;W, the Raging Bull, I don't know. The lighting's wierd, but it looks stainless to me, which would be good if the MP412 is black. The SKS, which is synth, has been spotted with an EOTech, so unlocking American optics for Russian guns and vice versa is confirmed. I'm thinking every optic, with the exception of the 6x and 12x sniper scopes, can be used on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:33, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, if you cant indentify that gun, then you shouldn't really be on the site to be honest, because you can clearly tell that's a mp412 the colt python has barrel housing grooves this doesnt it solid like an mp412 , you can also see the break action latch is,colt pythons dont have this because they are not break reloaders. *Edit* and how can you say that it is stainless? its clearly black with a synthetic grip.&lt;br /&gt;
:In that case, by your rationale you should leave right now. Ignoring everything else about the gun, look at the muzzle end. This pistol has a rounded barrel with a raised rib. The Mp412 does not. Also, the locking indents on the cylinder are wrong for a MP412, where they are small cuts coming from the rear of the cylinder, rather than the more traditional ones shown here. The part of the frame that meets the rear of the cylinder is also wrong for a MP412, which would have a &amp;quot;step&amp;quot; rather than a smooth ramp where it widens to the width of the cylinder. Due to the motion blur ghosting on this image it is really hard to tell anything about it so we will just have to wait and see. Also, sign your posts and stop being so condescending.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:22, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, just noticed that in the same clip the person in front of you has a G36C, so that can go ahead and be confirmed, along with the Stinger for that matter.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:47, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021255.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, these are official videos, not DICE ones, but offical meaning by a site/company etc; should they be added to the main page? It's kind of a grey area. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:25, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAX and NVIDIA are definitely can be considered official source just as E3 and IGN. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok lets just leave it as the t44/mp412 for now, if we cant agree on what gun it is, then theres no point arguing senselessly we'll have to wait until the game comes out to properly identify it --[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 14:10, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M4 and M4A1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was just browsing through twitter when i noticed something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/108437158804717568&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
both the M4 and M4A1 is in. like how the the M16A3 and A4 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 10:54, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's amuses me because I had ''exact'' the same thoughts. Seems I wasn't alone xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:10, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems to me more that BF3 will have much more weapons than we thought. Well, let's just pick one up and kick some asses with it :) --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:12, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think its pretty cool they are getting multiple variants for each gun. Heres hoping for an AK-47 unlock.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 12:06, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the same twitter he makes a point of saying that the M4A1 was designed for special forces whereas the standard weapon that would be found being used by Marines is the M4. My spidey sense is telling me that the standard weapons will be the burst M4 and M16A4, and they will be upgradable to full auto M4A1 and M16A3 (flat-top receiver won't tally and the number will make no sense to the layman but whatever).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, he already said the full auto ones are default. But I'd figure in SP we're more likely to see the burst ones. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:31, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::SP: M4 for regular Marines, M4A1 for USSOCOM units, something like that. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:50, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In any case, it's awesome they added variants of many weapons. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 17:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:28, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't remember where I saw it from, probably from Battlefield wiki but I remember seeing that the weapon variants were based on each Classes Kit selection. So for example, take the Assault class, as it's being merged with the Medic Class, Players would have the option to equip either a Grenade Launcher of carry around a Medkit. So for example, an M16A3 could be default setting with a Medkit as a piece of equipment but the M16A4 is used when attaching a grenade launcher. But that's just my theory [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:37, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not really merging, they're just going back to how they had it in BF2142 (Assault = Medic + Assault, Recon = Sniper + Special Forces, Engineer = Anti-tank + Engineer and Support = um, Support, his main &amp;quot;thing&amp;quot; being his extra droppable things like a portable shield and a sentry gun). In 2142 every Assault had a Medkit since you don't want to give your medics the option of being even more useless, the optional item for the Assault class was the defib. The fastest way to get TK'd as Assault was to have someone realise you weren't carrying one. I imagine this one will be the same, Support will always have an ammo box and assault will always have a health box. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PWP Trailer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-ukxgldpOo&amp;amp;feature=feedu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
warning, containts footage from operation metro they some players may find offensive. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:58, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is... ''SKS''? Reminds me of AK-47 in MW2 *sadface*&lt;br /&gt;
:Another thing noted: incorrect reticles for M145 and PKS-07 are still in... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:27, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember though DICE did say that you can &amp;quot;customize&amp;quot; your weapon, that might be a SKS just heavily modified by the player rather than appearing as the &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; weapon. Who know's if we're lucky, the SKS might be featured as standard in it's default config [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As much as I would want it to be, I doubt that what DICE meant by customization. BF3 so far doesn't seem to have customization as elaborate as, for example, [[Ghost Recon: Future Soldier]]. Thus this tacticool SKS is probably the only one *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:44, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; -.-... OMG! What the heck is their deal with the DAO-12? Can't they just call it how it supposed to be called?! --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 10:01, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE seems to have obsession with this &amp;quot;designation&amp;quot; as it tracks way back from Battlefield 2 (2005) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:16, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DAO-12 was used because of a legal conflict with Armsel using the Striker name, it became a fan favorite so they kept the name. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:09, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
i asked Demize on twitter and he replied saying it was a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 14:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly, and we all know how bad most gamers are at identifying weapons, the MW3 crowd widely believed the ACR was a SCAR because the ACR was tan (in MW2 the SCAR was tan and the ACR was this ugly grey colour, and now the ACR is tan). If they renamed it Striker a lot of BF players would think it was a different gun :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:20, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Er, that doesn't really sound like a bad thing :/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:29, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i asked demize about it, and he said they named it the DAO-12 as a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:57, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
I asked demize if there was an m14 battle rifle and he replied ,and said there is a M39 EMR so that can now be added to the weapons list.--[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 16:07, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He also said SG 550 would be in, official blog showed SG 553. And SKS is &amp;quot;SKS&amp;quot;. We need official ''illustrated'' material. As soon as it is available - go ahead, put it in. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:29, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, if we don't have a picture, don't add it, even if it's not leaked. It's not like we won't have everything up pretty soon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1/M16 Gas block question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen quite a few topics concerning the lack of a visible gas block on the M4's and M16's in a number of shooters, and I was wondering if it was possible that the gas blocks could be either low-profile gas blocks that were either not visible or were actually under the RAS, or if the gas blocks were actually integrated into an after-market RAS. It seems odd to me that developers would repeatedly make the same mistake over different games in different franchises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's possible to just remove the front sight without removing the gas block on a standard M16 rifle and M4 but it'd be a little exposed. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:23, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you mean with a hacksaw? Aren't the gas block and front sight a single piece of metal? It is however possible to get a low profile gas block (relatively easy replacement) that only extends above the barrel to the height of the gas tube plus a few mm, so that certain free floating RIS systems can be mounted over the top of it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:39, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That was my question; with all the Military consultants they have coming in and looking at this stuff, I'd always assumed that they had just modeled an after market RIS and low-profile gas-block.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder why developers won't just model Flat Top Mounts\Risers on the sights for M4s\M16s ? That's how the problem is solved IRL, including in U.S. Military. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:16, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd imagine that most modellers don't realise that the front sight is also the gas block, so they see no problem in removing it for aesthetic/gameplay purposes. 99% of gamers probably don't realise either.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:15, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both the modellers and the gamers doesn't supposed to care about this kind of things, only people like us, it can concern. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 09:31, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was well after I got into learning about firearms and such that I found out the front sight (gas block) and stock tube (buffer tube) are required for the AR series to function, so you can't remove either pretty much. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's true that the stock front sight post is also the same piece of metal as the gas block, but you can remove them so long as you put a new gas block on.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I meant you can't just take it off :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Confirmed to be the more modern 5.56mm version by Demize. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:08, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Guillotine Teaser Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else seen it? There's a mortar that the player-character uses to send up flares (I think they called them illumination rounds) and I think the player-character also uses a Mk. 17 with some sort of 4x scope. Sorry, I'm still fairly new to this. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:27, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the mortar is an M224, and yes it was a Mk.17 with an ACOG (magazine looked a bit small in the mag-well, but could be the angle as could only be seen when climbing the wall). Also, it looks like the guy who is stabbed at the end of the video is carrying a G3A3 with an ACOG.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 series reload animation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm fairly new to this site, though I've been following it closely to see the development of the firearms that will appear in Battlefield 3.&lt;br /&gt;
I've been reading that a lot of you guys are expecting an accurate portrait of the M16 series reload animation in the game. I just wanted to ask how do you properly reload an M16 in real life? It is my understanding that when the rifle is empty, you load it by pulling the charging handle. But when there is a bullet still in the chamber you just need to press the bolt catch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I just want to get this clarified since I've never been able to understand the reload mechanic of the M16.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:14, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:With the exception of loading the gun for the first time or clearing a jam, you never need to touch the charging handle. If you are reloading from a partial magazine, there will be a round in the chamber so all you need to do is drop out the magazine and push a new one in. When you you empty the magazine in an M16 type weapon the bolt locks back automatically, so you drop out the magazine, put a new one in, and then all you need to do is push the bolt release on the left side to let the bolt go forwards (you can also push the forward assist if you feel like it).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:20, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the third reason you might is if you just picked it up off the ground, to check it's still mechanically sound. Though that sorta falls under clearing a jam. Edit: Also you might part-pull it on drawing it if you're into brass checks, though given how often FPS characters change weapons habitually brass-checking on draw would probably indicate a very short memory. &amp;quot;Yep, still there from ten seconds ago, how bout that.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:09, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could rack the charging handle if you like, but the proper way to reload and empty M16 type weapon is to just slap the bolt release. I call it the ping pong paddle. A lot of games forgets about little things like reloads for weapons [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 01:02, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who removed the MP7!?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, who took away the MP7 from the submachine gun catergory? I spent a whole 20 minutes adding that section of the article and some guy just deleted it. Why? It was really in the game and not in any way spammy or vestigial.  Whoever took away put it back. Come on, I don't want to remake the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THere are NO official images of it.  And no official video footage has featured it.  Don't post images from the Alpha --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 03:20, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the fact remains that it has been seen in the game, and it was already on the page before I made the changes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why can't I use the Alpha? I don't know if there is or is not a rule regarding alpha version footage and stuff. I thought the purpose of this site was to chronicle what weapons were used in what movies/games/TV/Anime.  If I have evidence that the MP7 is in BF3, why does it matter whether or not it was from the Alpha or official footage?  The image I used was from a gameplay video I saw on Youtube.  Does this mean no one can use their own gameplay videos?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, it means that you have to wait for officially released material or for the game to actually come out. This applies to leaked gameplay footage, images from leaked betas, dubious leaked information in general (eg the MW3 leaks from Kotaku) unapproved on-set photos, leaked movie footage like that infamous cut of ''X-Men Origins: Wolverine'', and so on. Building an article is not a race, if we have to wait to confirm something is official, that's what we do. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:49, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose that makes sense, I'm gonna keep that in mind when making contributions in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought anything to do with the Alpha was under an NDA anyway? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:31, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, if you look at the screencap he posted the guy who leaked it deliberately blacked out his own name. Obviously knew he shouldn't have been recording it and posting it in the first place. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, for the last frickin' time.  Please DO NOT add weapons that are not in any official gameplay vids/trailers/screenshots, until they are.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 14:02, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ HashiriyaR32: Hey! I was also someone who tried adding the section of the MP7. Its in the alpha videos but to be fair, so is every freaking gun that is on this page! The only videos that are available are the ones from the alpha. Seriously take the amount of time it takes to delete the post and go onto youtube and see for yourself! In fact, after posting this I will repost the MP7 with a link to the youtube video...Also FYI I happen to love this website and for all it stands for and I try to monitor several different games to make sure the info is correct, I would never want to add something that didnt exist in a videogame/movie. Valant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What? Nothing on the page is from the alpha, everything's from screenshots, trailers, concept art, or official videos, like EA Pwned, IGN, etc. If you don't believe me, give me an example. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:52, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Valant, its as simple as this. To take part in the Alpha you had to sign a non disclosure agreement. That means that any footage that you have seen was illegally distributed. Until guns show up in an official (and legal) source, they shouldn't be listed here. The MP7 may very well be a weapon in the game, but the point is that at this point that information has not been publicly release, to say nothing of the fact that legal screenshots cannot be posted on here. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:11, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right, and as soon as the Beta is out, we can add everything, it's only a week-ish, and besides, WE all know the MP7 &amp;amp; others are in, and they can be mentioned on the talk page, just the official page can't have it. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:39, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I should just delete this whole page then shouldnt I? Because again every weapon we are seeing IS NOT CONFIRMED! There is no beta released and only Alpha videos....Seriously this is bullshit&lt;br /&gt;
:The difference is that all the other weapons are from material that was released by EA, or from footage that they allowed to be shot (The images from the G36C section are from an interview with one of the developers IIRC) as opposed to the video you posted which was illegal made and distributed by someone breaking the NDA they signed. As you seem unable to grasp this, just wind your neck in for a week or so until the Beta is released, and then it can be posted with LEGALLY obtained confirmation images. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:15, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If posting info from a breach of NDA is the main reason than I can understand that. Then I shall wait for the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; information to be released.&lt;br /&gt;
== G3A3 and UMP.45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The weapons can be seen in these videos from GameSpot in the Tokyo Game Show 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it's cam footage you can clearly see the pick-up icon of the weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should work their magic and add those to the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd0M7_3wENw Part 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbsI9Vsv5wE Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arOhTIaeGGY Part 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 12:59, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can have it down in about 20 minutes. --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would imagine that if it is cam footage it has likely not been officially release and is against copyright, so probably shouldn't have caps on here. You can get a shot of the G3A3 from the end of the guillotine trailer though.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:05, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the two weapons on the page. Since the videos were not leaked but released by a reputable game journalism/review site (Gamespot.com) it should be okay, right?  If they weren't allowed to release it Gamespot wouldn't have done so. I looked around and other gaming websites are posting the footage as well [http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tgs-11-battlefield-3/721062]. I'm pretty new to IMFDB, so is the stuff I saw in the gameplay okay to post? --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Similary to E3 with IGN, PAX with NVIDIA, TGS with GameSpot definitely can be considered official source. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:53, 18 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1911 Confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gunclub.ea.com/us/intel/blog/battlefield3-weapon-unlock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For being an EA gunclub member you get an M1911 :P --Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Gun-Club/images/bf3-gun-unlock.jpg --[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:39, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not too sure exactly what pistol they have based this on though. It has slanted cocking serrations on the slide (rear only), non target sights, beavertail grip safety and a rounded burr hammer. Closest thing I can think of is the early version of the [[1911#M-45_MEUSOC|M-45 MEUSOC]], which are a old USGI 1911 frame with a [[1911#Springfield_Armory_M1911_-_A1|Sprinfield Armoury]] slide, a rounded hammer, a beavertail grip safety and Pachmayr rubber grips (along with some other less obvious improvements).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I'm pretty sure it IS the original version of the MEU. Also, you missed the Springfield 3-hole trigger. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:24, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gun Club? Looks like EA is messing up again: http://gunclub.ea.com/us/mygunclub/rewards&lt;br /&gt;
:They haven't even fixed the stat tracking :S --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:12, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 Open Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, EA confirmed the PC/X360/PS3 BETA startup. Begining 27.09 for those who have MoH 2010 Tier One Edition, and 29.09 for the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
Good opportunity to test the game and get some guns updated :). ~ GumBoy 21.09.2011 16.07 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, the early access is open for people with the Medal of Honor Limited Edition as well, not just Tier One. It's also for people who pre-ordered before a certain cutoff, but I can't remember the specifics. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 09:10, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can't wait for this, hope we get a different map this time, Operation Metro was good but not great. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:37, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Caspian Border would be great :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:06, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP2000 Spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog pics here: http://www.battlefieldlog.com/2011/09/battlefield-3-beta-battlelog.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pdUIBRNHpXo/Tn4uZQaayQI/AAAAAAAAAdw/PVmts2hVNjU/s1600/battlelog-4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's the pistol, what's the shotgun? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:09, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the handgun is a Glock variant, whilst the shotgun is Benelli M3 Super 90. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 08:02, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I saw the PP2000 in action at Eurogamer Expo, looked pretty good. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:16, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hmm, I never saw it before. The shotgun is the 870 MCS and the pistol is the Glock 17. If you look at the page, he's level 0 with no XP, so these are the first unlocks, which makes sense given what they are: a shotgun, a pistol that isn't faction-based that's similar to the M9 and MP443, and a PDW. Also, now that the PP2000 has a stock we won't have any more stockless guns, specifically stockless guns with scopes... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:08, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, the magazine tube is rather short for M870 MCS. Which would mean it is rather regular variant of M870 with pistol grip and full stock. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:49, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, the MCS is modular, hence the name, it just has the 4 round tube as standard, with the 7 round one as an attachment. This is the MCS: http://www.kiesler.com/shop/ProductImages/Model870MCS_PartSLG.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:57, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The magazine tube in MCS is supposed to have the same length as the barrel as can be seen here: [http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/Firearms/Shotguns%20Pump/MCS.aspx Remington Model 870 Modular Combat Shotgun (MCS)]. Thus the 3+1 MCS would have the same 10&amp;quot; barrel. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:23, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I understand it's supposed to, but it's still an MCS, just not assembled properly or something. If you don't like it, just use the extended tube attachment, I know I will be, and Demize confirmed (how many times have I written those two words now?) all the extended mag attachments are visible, like the MP7s 40 round magazine, or this shotgun. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:50, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::If that's so... Okey, an oddly assembled MCS ¯\(°_o)/¯&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::P.S. I didn't count how many times you have written those two words D: --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:02, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::LOL! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:08, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Demize confirmed that Alex says 'Demize confirmed' a lot. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:00, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::[http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg/hr/im-metal-hs-2000-e.html XD] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACR?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOHjF4_apI&amp;amp;feature=channel_video_title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magpul Masada/ ACR?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 0:36, the handguard and flashhider look very similar to that of the ACR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it might be the SG 553, also has a similar flashhider. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:07, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree, it is the SG 553. Can tell by the design of the rail system, shape of the receiver and the fact that it has a smooth curve to the top of the stock rather than an adjustable cheek riser.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 12:14, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also see the M320 Launcher at 0:41, so thats one more launcher for the page [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:09, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ugh, what a song choice :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whine, whine, whine. No game is good enough for you people. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:41, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not game - song &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, finally can see the M320 mounted instead of standalone :D And yeah, I agree that's the 553. Oh, and what do you mean &amp;quot;you people&amp;quot;? Lol ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:05, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I thought you were complaining about the game. I was just joking when I said that. *rolls eyes* - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:44, 27 September 2011 (CDT)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NDA for Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, from what I'm hearing the Beta is going to be subject to an NDA, just like the Alpha. This may just be for the early access and may be rescinded once it goes public, or it may be for the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What this means is that we can't post info or shots from the Beta build until it is rescinded. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:02, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://twitter.com/#!/zh1nt0/status/115781634879524864 Disregard.] I screwed up, again. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:15, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha :) That's good news [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:18, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G17C modelled after G17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just talked to a DICE dev on Steam, and he told me the reason they modelled the G17C after a regular G17 it's to save prestanda so the game can run as smoothly as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
So that's why is missing those compesators &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; on the slide. And the reason they decided to still call it a G17C, is because is only a minor detail. They probably have more relevant things to fix, than changing the correct name of a weapon. edit: forgot to sign [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's understandable, given the crazy graphics and everthing else this game it running. If they don't change it we'll note it as incorrect on the main page, but note that it was intentionally left out; if they do know the correct difference between the C and standard, but needed to do for technical reasons, I'm happy. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:33, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But someone could state in the main page, that it was left there intentionally due to some other and more important things to worry about in the development of the game. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess that proves that Frostbite 2 Engine is much more complicated and difficult to mod than Refractor 2 Engine. To fix weapon's name in Battlefield 2 one needed a mere Notepad ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:57, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well not change, since the config files will have weapon names in plain text that can be replaced (unless the names are actually images or something). [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:49, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's stupid what the guy from DICE said: &amp;quot;''We modeled the gun after the regular G17 so the game would run faster...''&amp;quot; Huh? So if the gun is actually a 100% G17, why call G17C? Am I missing something here? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 04:10, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Modelling the holes ''would'' require they put an inside surface on the barrel, but I can't see how an engine that features buildings falling into hundreds of pieces of high-detail rubble would be screwed over by that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:47, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corrected some information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went through and fixed some things. There is a Korean M16 that has 4 firing modes and the shotgun in Op Gullotine is a Remington 870 which you can tell by looking at the rear sight. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:23, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has four? Cool, didn't know that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:41, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lack of weapon variety ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theres so many AK and M4 style weapons but no real variety, wheres the steyr, uzi and such.&lt;br /&gt;
The snipers are pretty much useless after the first two so why change ?&lt;br /&gt;
Like 3 AK styled assault rifles ?&lt;br /&gt;
Am i missing the point because it seems Mw3 has a much better weapon variety.&lt;br /&gt;
When i unlocked the SkS it takes 4 bullets to kill. That's double what the other two took even though they're the same calibre. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are lazy. Quite a bunch of unlocks are derivatives of starting weapons. There are so many European weapons that could be put as unlocks, but nooooo! Maybe DICE are saving for DLCs? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah when they said 10 times the unlocks, who knew they meant dogtags and pistols with new attachments. And we have to unlock the same attachments for every other gun over and over. Whats with the lack of guns ? :/ And Some weapons like the m16 take 6 bullets to kill... the ump takes 7 from my experience. So why even bother using these weapons when i can have a sniper that 2 hit kills with a RDS. The beta has dissapointed me. --[[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Maybe the game will have a &amp;quot;Hardcore&amp;quot; mode like the Modern Warfere games. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:51, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Always fun when people complain about balance before the balance has had any meaningful time to settle. Tomorrow people will be complaining half these things are totally overpowered when they figure out how to use them properly. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:34, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Im not complaining about balance, if AR's take 6 hits to kill, i dont mind ill stick to my battle rifle. Just wish there was more variety is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, from trying the PS3 beta it seemed all my weapons took ~6 hits to kill while all their weapons killed me instantly. Nothing like repeatedly being murdered by a spawncamper with, of all the goddamn things in the world, a UMP. &amp;gt;:( [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All of the 5.56mm (and 9mm) weapons do 25 damage at point blank, making them 4 hit kill, and start dropping after about 20 feet, so 5 at midrange seems better, but could be 6, I can't see how far you're shooting. Also, all the 7.62mm (and .45) guns do 33.4 damage at point blank. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, I hope they fix the damage, from what I'm reading it's pretty stupid right now. :\ - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:35, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Personnally I like the fact that there are many AK &amp;amp; AR15 style firearms in it, and for that you have to unlock the attachements for each gun, I don't see a problem there, you just have to use the guns if you really want them. --[[User:VillageFroid|VillageFroid]] 12:11 October 2 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yeah i dont mind unlocking the same attachments over and over its just that they said there's 10 times the unlocks and not the same unlock 10 times however the amount of attachments is a nice touch. I just wish there was more weapons is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There, I removed all Kalashnikov and Stoner weapons and thats what is left, why are you guys complaining? The weapon selection is good. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:04, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G3A3 &lt;br /&gt;
AN-94 &lt;br /&gt;
KH2002 &lt;br /&gt;
AEK-971 &lt;br /&gt;
F2000 &lt;br /&gt;
AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer) &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
G36C &lt;br /&gt;
SCAR-H CQC &lt;br /&gt;
A-91 &lt;br /&gt;
SG553  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M249E2 &lt;br /&gt;
M60 &lt;br /&gt;
M240 &lt;br /&gt;
6P41 &lt;br /&gt;
QYJ 88 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SVD (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
M40A5 &lt;br /&gt;
SV98 &lt;br /&gt;
M98B &lt;br /&gt;
M82A3 (not in MP) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M39 EMR &lt;br /&gt;
SKS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P90TR &lt;br /&gt;
MP7A1 &lt;br /&gt;
UMP45 &lt;br /&gt;
PDR &lt;br /&gt;
PP2000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
870 MCS &lt;br /&gt;
M1014 &lt;br /&gt;
USAS-12  &lt;br /&gt;
Striker &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M9 (US) &lt;br /&gt;
MP443 (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
G17 &lt;br /&gt;
M-45 &lt;br /&gt;
MP412 &lt;br /&gt;
T44 &lt;br /&gt;
93R &lt;br /&gt;
G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the main game comes out, we'll all see the diversity, alot of the weapons in the Beta are mostly there for testing purposes, I haven't even seen anyone unlock ALL the weapons yet in the Beta so I'm not sure how many exist there. Plus we might also see more weapon diversity in the Singleplayer [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:To add on to my reply, I should also mention that while yes I feel a little disappointed that they didn't add some other &amp;quot;common&amp;quot; weapons like a traditional MP5 or some other weapons like certain Pump Action Shotguns, it doesn't really phase me too much, because from what I've seen thus far they've pretty much nailed some of the roles appriopriately. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:23, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok so ive done a bit of research, veteran gives you one extra weapon, Co-op gives you 6 extra weapons and the first expansion gives you 10 weapons.... thats 17 more weapons. I feel more comfortable now :) Not only that but theres plans for more expansions :) http://mp1st.com/2011/10/02/leaked-weapon-list-for-battlefield-3-back-to-karkand-dlc/ - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In realistic terms 9mm subguns and indeed subguns in general have fallen out of favour since the 80s / 90s and largely replaced by 5.56mm carbine rifles in their traditional roles as bad guys started wearing body armour. From what I've heard, neither the UMP or the MP7 did anything like as well as their older brother. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite right. The co-op and veteran weapons are among the list we have now, only the Back To Karkand expantion give new weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something that someone should suggest to the Battlefield Twitter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter so I would appreciate if someone did this for me. I want a option where I can set my spawn prefences. Right now I'm using the UMP 45 and each time I spawn, I set it to 2 round burst and turn off the tac light till I need it. I would like if I can set an option that I spawn the way I want and not full auto. Most of the time I don't use full auto unless its a machine gun. Ghost Recon had this option and I liked it. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 13:26, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excited ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im excited that this game will be more realistic than most others. I like the fact we will also be able to use selector switches. Did I hear right? The UMP-45 has a two round burst mode? I wasn't aware the UMP had a burst mode. I always thought it had Semi and auto.--[[User:Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can have a semi, 2-round burst, auto trigger group option. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:48, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Duh, that's what manufacturer's sites for ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.heckler-koch.de/HKWebText/detailPara/1926/82/4/20/213 UMP on H&amp;amp;K's European site]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/ump_specs.asp UMP on H&amp;amp;K's US site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H&amp;amp;K is usually pretty good about having burst option trigger packs. You just don't hear about it very often because in most movies and television shows, the selector is always set to rock n roll.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 18:22, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=4707&amp;amp;sid=91faa55311d7c875027fba7bd657d6fb&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A whole bunch of leaked info, from the game files I believe. The working names for some SP missions, and all the Co-op and MP maps too, as well as the unique to BTK weapon list. Note that they incorrectly call the HK53 an MP5, even though it actually was called HK53 in BF2 :confused face: As of now it is unknown whether these will carry over to the standard game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-FAMAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-HK53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MGs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBB-95&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-MG36&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L96&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SMG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-PP-19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotgun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Jackhammer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:33, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LOL, Jackhammer is back. That was the only prototype gun in BF2 xD&lt;br /&gt;
:'''@Alex''' HK53 was the carbine for Euro Force's Spec Ops class. Whether MP5 was the submachine gun for USMC's Anti-Tank class ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Edit:''' Ah, I've read the thread. There are probably going to be both weapons in the DLC \o/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure would love to see the FAMAS. I was secretly hoping for the XM8 to return, but I guess you can't get everything. [[user:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 11:40, 3 October 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The XM8 did return, it's called the G36. They just didn't put it inside a silly plastic model spaceship. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 11:19, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well said. I have to agree you on that, I prefer the actual G36 rather than the 'uber-futuristic-tacticool' plastic prototype that is... wait, was... wait it didn't even leave the prototype stages... well anyways, that is the xm8 --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] 12:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== .44 Magnumn, M60, USAS-12 and Claymore gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Found some videos of the Claymore and Revolver in action, looks like the T-44 is just called .44 Magnum any idea what kind of revolver it is? Also M60E4 is seen in one vid with a 200 round capacity and USAS-12 with a 7 round box mag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLW7WcIv_gA&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExvIOmviDgw&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 16:06, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a [[Taurus Model 44]]. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess DICE followed IW's example. They named Colt Anaconda simply &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot; before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm liking the new .44 Magnum from what Videos I've seen so far. Up close it seems to behave just like how a .44 Magnum should. At short-close range (10 or less feet) it seems to kill in one shot to the upper chest/head but further distances (up to say 30-40 feet) seem to kill in 2 shots to the body or one to the head. Plus with addition of a Scoped version, I can see this being the ideal &amp;quot;Mini-Sniper&amp;quot;. I think the way there going about it is the MP412 is the better option up close while the .44 Mag is better at range. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 07:28, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the description of the HK416 on the main page and there is something I don't quite understand.&lt;br /&gt;
In the main page it states that the weapon in-game has 3 firing modes; semi, 3-round burst and auto and that there aren't many Stoner lower receivers that support 3 firing modes. But isn't the Stoner platform manufactured by KAC? And why is it being use on a HK manufactured weapon? And if that is the case, then shouldn't it be pointed out as custom HK416?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And my other question is about the licensing of the weapons. Since there are other HK weapons that goes by their correct names like the MP7A1, G36C, M27 IAR and M320. Why would they license those particular weapons and not the HK416, making DICE name it M416? I think is most likely a misunderstanding rather than a copyright issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please correct me here if I'm wrong. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:24, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are hell-bent on making HK416 the US' service rifle. Can't think of any other reason. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:38, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's because &amp;quot;HK416&amp;quot; has HK's company name right there in the weapon name. It might be more of a copyright thing. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 21:01, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eugene Stoner is the inventor of the the AR 15/AR10/M16/M4. The name for the platform as a whole is the Stoner. There are over 100 manufacturers of AR 15s in the US. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:55, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably what Masterius and Gato said, the Devs really, really want the HK416 to be the US standard (cause it ID better) :) And it has HK in the name, same reason the Glocks are G17/18. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:11, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although Battlefield 2 had HK21 and HK53... And this makes me curious. Are they going to rename HK53 if/when it comes back? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:50, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh right, well then it's probably the same reason the Striker is still the DAO-12, they kept the name the same as it's always been in BF. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:52, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glitch with the PDR? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else notice whenever you're using the PDR, It randomly switches from a 20 round mag to a 30 round mag? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:45, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently the extended mags are included by default.  They're taken off if you have any barrel attachment. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:58, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=5033&amp;amp;sid=fa2af8c4723e98f64dadab8b5b9897d8&lt;br /&gt;
At the bottom. In one we can see a suppressed M40A5, and in on of the AKS-74U ones we can see his Coop buddy has a KH2002. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:54, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS iron-sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone remember which sight you would use in the beta if you were using an M26 mounted on one of the assault rifles? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:48, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I never used the M26 in the beta, but with the M320 mounted on a rifle you would just zoom halfway in, a la the shotguns in previous Battlefield games. I reckon that the M26 would do the same. [[User:Krakydak|Krakydak]] 17:56, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same irons as the P90, Striker, F2000, M40A3, and M98B; the aftermarket ones. Oh wait, ON the AR? The AR's sights, like Crysis 2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:29, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why is the &amp;quot;RPK 74M&amp;quot; chambered in 7.62x39 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111001163136/battlefield/images/5/5f/RPK-74M.png Look here]... note the curvature of the magazine, the lack of the flash hider, the steel ribbed mag.... why can't games ever get the RPK right? Either putting a 75 round drum on the 74M, or this....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A lot of the pics on Battlelog were wrong, like the G18's pic was a 17, but it does have the selector in game. Let me see an in game pic with the 7.62 mag, and I'll agree. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:36, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rather odd that [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/ak74m_656x369.png?cb=1317663410 AK-74M] has proper image but [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/rpk_656x369.png?cb=1317663545 RPK-74M] has black RPK (not even RPKM) instead. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:06, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::On a side note: do 45-round STANAG magazines even exist? Talking about [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/m27_656x369.png?cb=1317664019 M27].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110929075021/battlefield/images/6/69/RPK_-_Beta.gif] that's it in first person, trust me the mag is a 7.62 ribbed steel mag in the game, I can't find a screenshot, but you can see it in the right light while reloading....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes! Not military issue, but I don't get the point of the M27 as a support weapon IRL, this helps at least. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=26456/Product/AR-15-M16-45-ROUND-MAGAZINE [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, cool. Didn't know that :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I didn't know that stuff about the AKs, it's what we're all here for :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:19, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah! :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:52, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I am adding renders of all the weapons from the offical site. In case anyone thinks I missed them, the MP-443, M16A3, F2000 Tactical, KH2002, M16A4, AKS-74U, M4, A-91, and GP-30 do not have entries there yet, but I will add them here when they do. Well, except the GP-30, because I doubt it will get one... poor GP-30 :'( EDIT: Done! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:43, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for this being offtopic:&lt;br /&gt;
:I wish Devs added [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=271&amp;amp;backPID=265&amp;amp;productID=89&amp;amp;pid_product=297&amp;amp;pidList=265&amp;amp;categorySelector=7&amp;amp;detail=&amp;amp;cHash=a367c3feaf GL1] to F2000, [http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?Itemid=5&amp;amp;catid=20:all-other-weapons&amp;amp;id=36:the-hk79-underbarrel-grenade-launcher&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article HK79] to G3 and [http://kbptula.ru/eng/str/strelk/556a91.htm the unnamed UGL] to A-91 (with the barrel length of 415 mm (same as AK-74M), it would be classified as assault rifle (compact one though, because its overall length is lesser than that of AK-74M with stock folded [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_a91m_eng.html] [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_ak-74m_eng.html] )). But that's probably would be too much to ask :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:54, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would have been nice, though, the F2000's GL1 is solved by not letting it mount a GL, and we haven't seen one mounted to the G3 yet. Who knows, maybe it will become an HK79 like the GP-30 :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:06, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things: this site doesn't have a KH2002 page, and if there's a newer version from 2009, shouldn't they have named it KH2009? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't even find any sources mentioning 2009. They just say KH2002 was revealed to public\entered service in 2004 and show the pictures of either long carrying handle or short carrying handle (the most seen one) variant :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:37, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are 3 different versions of the KH2002 I have seen. The first is the initial 2002 model which has a short carry handle and front sight post at the front of the receiver. Then there is the 2006 model that has a long carry handle and no front sight post. Lastly there is the 2009 model that has the long carry handle but a barrel mounted front sight post along with a built up finger grooved front grip. Not sure about the dates, but this is deffinitely the way the KH2002 design progressed. I have also heard that there are three different barrel lengths for the KH2002, but I have only seen the standard length (pictured) and the short barrel, which was on an original model, with the barrel ending at the end of the receiver. Have never seen a picture of the DMR length barrel. As for the name being KH2002, all I can say is that M1903s made in the 30s were called M1903A1s and not M1930s. It is basically the same rifle, so why change the name.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:31, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah true, I guess I'm just thinking there should be some way to tell them apart by name. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:53, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After a bit of research, I found out that the version in this game (have seen exactly the same gun with and without front sight post so not sure which is the correct one, or maybe it is detached when optics are added which appear to be a copy of the old Colt 4x20 scope) is not called the Khaybar but the Sama, so will change the article accordingly.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.irandefence.net/showthread.php?t=44114 This the source], correct? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::First saw it mentioned on MilitaryPhotos.net, but it is mentioned on quite a few Iranian defence forums and blogs that the most recent version (the one in the game) is called the Sama rather than the Khaybar.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 11:25, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Makarov PB (6P9) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dogtags :) http://www.enterbf3.com/news/579-159-battlefield-3-dog-tags/ What's interesting is, if you look below the M39 in the bottom rightish, there's a Makarov PB, beside the suppressed M9. I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a suppressed MP-443, or if it will actually be in, but it's very interesting. Also note a lot of weapons seem to be missing, most likely since this isn't the full selection of dogtags. Oh, and there's two P90s, someone screwed up :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ya the USAS-12 dogtag shows a SPAS-12 instead--[[User:Anarchy66660|Anarchy66660]] 01:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The designer of PB isn't Makarov, it's Deryagin[http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_spesial_pb_eng.html] :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I was just assuming it was Makarov :/ At any rate, has it ever been in a BF game before? If it's in this one I'm gonna totally use it with the AS :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Makarov but still no USP? :( [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 08:29, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sure MW3 will have more USPs than you can shake a stick at. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 23:24, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic changes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For some reason during the Faultline demo, the M4s were all equipped with ACOGs and the SAW gets the EOtech, but in the actual game, they reverse it where all the M4s during the mission have EOtechs and the SAW had the ACOG. Just something I noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my problem is when an M4 is equipped with an ACOG, we still see the front sight post, but when we aimed, the front sight post disappeared when in reality, we should be able to see see it [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 23:11, 25 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason for that is because most videogames don't ''do'' scopes, at least not properly. Typically (there's some exceptions) the game removes the rifle viewmodel completely and slaps an overlay over the screen to represent the scope. This results in glitches like drawing the scope a frame too early and ending up looking down the scope overlay at the rifle itself, or, as here, the front sight going AWOL along with the rest of the rifle. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 00:10, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we need to crop the renders down; that's a lot of white space. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 03:34, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Click the images and look at the sizes, if you do that you'll end up with them about 200 pixels across. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:54, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:So we're padding images then? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:47, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I got those, and those are the originals, as big as they come. If we find bigger ones later, feel free to replace them, but the I after saving 50ish pics, resaving them all as jpegs so they'd work here, uploading them all one at a time, and adding them all to the page, I didn't feel like taking the time to crop :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:20, 26 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally those &amp;quot;in game renders&amp;quot; look to actually be the renders the pickup icons are the outlines of. Hence them lacking rear sights on weapons that can mount optics. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:59, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I got this one ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just uploaded a few screens as tests, I'll do more when I'm awake enough to not suck horribly at the game. Also, this page is a hideous mess. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:07, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just play SP Campaign on Easiest difficulty ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, is Co-op mode using the same missions as SP? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:48, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Apparently not, one of the guys on the forum says there's one co-op mission with a controllable helicopter. I wouldn't know, I've only owned the game for three hours. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 07:51, 28 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: There is one mission where you spend the entire level in an AH1Z Viper and it's pretty much target practice to get used to the chopper controls as the enemy AI have a hard time figuring out if their weapons are actually guns or if they're just oddly shaped Easy Bake Ovens.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=476850</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=476850"/>
		<updated>2011-10-28T01:22:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* AN-94 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{workinprogress}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Battlefield 3'' (also known as ''BF3'') is the twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', also the direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', which was released on June 21, 2005. The game was developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions CE (DICE) and published by Electronic Arts on October 25, 2011 in North-America, later in Australia on October 27th and on October 28th in Europe. One of the main features of the game is the new engine, the Frostbite 2, which brings a large improvement from ''[[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]]'s'' engine, and includes the graphics, sounds, animations, gameplay overall and much more. ''BF3'' is developed for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 platforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission that was shown during gameplay footage, a Marine who is sitting in front of the player has a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]] pistol holstered to his vest. It can also be seen in the multiplayer footage of E3 that the player is reloading his M9. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine has 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. An M9 fitted with a suppressor can be seen in the CO-OP trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM9.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M9 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_pistol_m9.png|thumb|none|650px|A Beretta M9 holstered to a Marine's vest's is circled in red. Also note that the same U.S. Marine is inaccurately shown to have a U.S. Flag Patch on his sleeve. In reality, U.S. Marines do not wear flag or unit patches on their sleeves.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9.jpg|thumb|none|650px|M9 being reload by the player in multiplayer footage.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:bf3m92.JPG|thumb|none|650px|M9 fitted with suppressor used by the player in co-op footage.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from Bad Company 2, as it's briefly visible in the multiplayer kill list in the &amp;quot;Operation Métro&amp;quot; trailer. It is the Russian faction's sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|350px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_MP443_killtext.JPG|thumb|none|296px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3Grach.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads an MP-443 in the recent Caspian Border multiplayer trailer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Grach.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Grach MP-443]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot; in the beta, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide. It comes standard with a laser sight.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|350px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG17.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G17 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg Glock 17 in the Battlelog]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Glock bf3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsupressed variant. Note that the Battlelog picture (seen below) lacks a fire selector, but is actually different than that G17's picture. This is most likely because it is from an early build of the game, as it appears correctly in-game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG18.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G18 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 44 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Taurus Model 44]]  appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name, most likely due to legal reasons. In campaign mode, the antagonist Solomon uses one as his personal sidearm.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 44 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLModel44.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Model 44 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from ''Bad Company'' and ''Bad Company 2'' as an unlockable sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLMP-412.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MP-412 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 93R ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 93R]] can be unlocked a sidearm, and is correctly named &amp;quot;93R&amp;quot;, while most games seem to call it the &amp;quot;M93R&amp;quot;, which is incorrect. The 93R's Battlelog picture (seen below) shows the weapon is actually a Beretta 92SB with a muzzle brake and foregrip added. However, the G18's picture shows it without the selector (which would make it a 17), but in-game it is correctly an 18, which might mean the 93R is also correct in-game, though it has not been seen yet.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Beretta93-1-.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta 93R - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL93R.jpg|thumb|none|350px|93R in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|M-45]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM-45.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M-45 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Submachine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
A detailed pick-up icon for the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45]] can be seen in GameSpot's recently released Tokyo Game Show gameplay footage. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single/2 round burst/full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLUMP45.jpg|thumb|none|350px|UMP45 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMPBF45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Pick-up icon for the UMP45.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from Bad Company 2, feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packing a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game, in which its firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and its power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponent's face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|350px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLPP2000.jpg|thumb|none|350px|PP-2000 in-game render. Note that it lacks a magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pp-2k.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-2000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN P90#P90 TR|FN P90TR (Triple Rail)]] can be seen in E3 coverage from IGN. It can be used by any kit once unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLP90TR.jpg|thumb|none|350px|P90TR in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:battp90.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Soldier wielding the FN P90TR. Notice that the magazine in the P90 is not locked inside the mechanism but inside the weapon itself(!). This is probably just a model error only within the alpha version of the game. It also appears to be a tad over-sized too.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit, and can also be equipped with 40 round magazines, as opposed to the 20 round standard.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLMP7A1.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MP7A1 in-game render. Though shown in this render, the 40-round magazine is not default in-game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 551 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. The standard M4/M4A1 has a KAC RIS handguard, Crane SOPMOD stock, aftermarket pistol grip (???), M16A1 flash hider, and Magpul Ranger Plates. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M4A1 Carbine - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM4A1.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M4A1 in-game render. Note the lack of any kind of rear sight.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:M4BF3Teaser02.jpg‎|600px|thumb|none|The M4A1 is clearly shown in the hand of the player with various attachments, as the Marines are about to perform an entry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wmplayer_2011-03-03_21-30-55-59.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player is running with his M4A1 after engaging the enemy during the first episode of the &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; videos.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield-3-screenshot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player is reloading his M4A1.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4carryinghandle.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M4A1 is appearing here with carrying handle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|450px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-AKS74U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AKS-74U in idle view.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3-e3-screenshot-28-d.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Looking through the AKS-74U's iron sights.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AKS-74U in-game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
The First Generation FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto by default.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_SCAR_-1-.jpg|thumb|none|450px|First Gen Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H with M68 Aimpoint scope and Grippod foregrip - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLSCAR-HCQC.jpg|thumb|none|350px|SCAR-H CQC in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3Scar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his SCAR-H, fitted with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and RIS foregrip. Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[A-91]] appears and, being a carbine (or just a really short rifle), is used by the 'Engineer' kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the 9A-91 from ''Bad Company 2'', albeit firing the 5.56mm NATO round instead of the 9A-91's 9x39mm one.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|450px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. It can fire, semi, auto, or two-round burst. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG36C.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G36C in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A teammate in front of player is seen using a G36C.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLSG553.jpg|thumb|none|350px|SG 553 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3sg553.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The render of the SG 553 showing the various attachments and combat roles available for the weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapon to be shown on early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development, though were added later on. It has been confirmed that both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. They have M16A1 flash hiders and a rail cover on the right side rail, and the fire selector is also always set to semi. It is the standard assault rifle used by the US 'Assault' kit. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:M16BF3Teaser.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The Marine on the top middle of the screen is carrying an M16A4 during the briefing scene; note the lack of rear iron sight or even optical sight.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Eapwned_m16a4.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A demonstration of the character's movement animation, using an M16A4 with carrying handle attached. You can also note a Magpul attached to the magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4nosight.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In this picture, it seems that the developers have removed the front gas block like in '''Call of Duty'''. So in this case, the rifle would not properly function like in reality. This has since been fixed by having the player co-witness the sights.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:M16 ups.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M16 UPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers. It is the standard assault rifle used by the Russian 'Assault' kit. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|500px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLAK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|350px|AK-74M in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10823 battlefield-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10825 battlefield-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AK-74M_BF3_2.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ak74M]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416&amp;quot;, most likely for copyright reasons. For some reason is has semi, auto, and two round burst firing modes, something that most Stoner platforms aren't capable of.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLHK416.jpg|thumb|none|350px|HK416 in-game render. Note lack of sights.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|H&amp;amp;K HK416]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971s ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971|AEK-971s]] is an unlock for the Assault kit, and, like the real weapon, has virtually no recoil. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|500px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLAEK-971s.jpg|thumb|none|350px|AEK-971s in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will always be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped, though this may or may not change in the final game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|450px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series. The AN-94's dual-rate full-auto mode has been correctly featured in Battlefield 3. When set to burst, the weapon fires an 1800RPM 2-round burst, and when set to full auto, it fires the first two shots at 1800RPM, while the rest are fired at 600RPM. If the M320 is selected and mounted on the weapon, it will instead be a GP-30, though if set to standalone, will still be an M320. The AN-94 is unique in that it starts in 2-round burst by default, in contrast to every other weapon in BF3, which all use the most aggressive fire mode available by default, usually full auto. The weapon has 2-round burst and full auto, but lacks the semi-automatic mode the real one has. This is most likely because with an 1800RPM 2-round burst mode, it would have virtually no purpose. One detail that should be noted is that in the single-player campaign, the 2 round burst is shown to incorrectly fire at the 600 rpm as opposed to the correct 1800 rpm, though this may be fixed as the game still contains a handful of bugs.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|500px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLAN-94.jpg|thumb|none|350px|AN-94 in-game render. Note the odd green magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Sama ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the [[DIO KH2002|DIO KH2002 Sama]] assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved Sama model introduced in 2009, as noted by the diagonal cuts on the receiver as opposed to horizontal, side mounted rails and the combination of long carry handle and barrel mounted front sight. From the pick-up icon however, the in-game rifle appears to lack the improved front grip found on the Sama rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In campaign mode, the weapon is often found in the hands of Iranian Army soldiers after the PLR's hostile takeover. It fires in single shot and 3-round burst firing modes, and uses Russian optics. It can be unlocked for multiplayer use via co-op mode. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fun Fact: The rifle is named after &amp;quot;The Battle of Khaybar,&amp;quot; where the Muslim Prophet Muhammad lead a victorious attack against a large settlement of Jews living in the Arabian settlement of Khaybar. Muhammad believed that the loot and prestige gained from Khaybar would be necessary in order to fund his future military campaigns.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:KH@))@.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|An enemy soldier drops the KH2002 after being shot in the face.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:KH2002_pick_up.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Detailed pick-up icon that definitively proves the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the new &amp;quot;Securing the Apartment Block&amp;quot; gameplay footage that was recorded at the Tokyo Game Show, a pick-up icon for a [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] can be seen. Since Battlefield 3 takes place (for the most part) in Northern Iraq and Iran, it is entirely possible that this is actually an Iranian manufactured G3 and not a standard H&amp;amp;K one. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver, whereas the version depicted appears to have a wide handguard. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLG3A3.jpg|thumb|none|350px|G3A3 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3A3bf3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely because, other than firing the 5.56mm round, the gun is basically an SMG. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|A more recent model of the Magpul PDR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLPDR.jpg|thumb|none|350px|PDR in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|450px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLAS.jpg|thumb|none|350px|AS in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM27.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M27 in-game render. Note lack of sights like with the HK416.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iar+.jpg|thumb|none|600px|IAR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kalashnikov RPK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|501px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLRPK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|350px|RPK-74M in-game render. Note that it incorrectly has a 7.62x39mm magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rpk.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M249 SAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249 SAW]]  was seen in E3 multiplayer footage. It has a STANAG magazine well, making it an M249 variant, though the rest of the gun's features belong to the Mk 46 Mod 0.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M249E1.jpg‎|thumb|none|450px|M249-E1 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|450px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM249.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M249 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M249.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M249 SAW used by the player in E3 multiplayer footage. Note the M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|501px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLPKP.jpg|thumb|none|350px|PKP in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PKP.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some U.S. Marines, and in the hands of the player, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM240B.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M240B in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3TeaserM249.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player uses an M240B fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS) while engaging multiple enemies in the teaser video.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf6.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A U.S. Marine in the foreground is seen using an M240B.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2401.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Full view of the M240B as seen in the recent Fault Line 3 trailer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M60E4 Mk.43 with picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM60E4.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M60E4 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. It appears in the material marketing the pre-order rewards.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLQJY-88.jpg|thumb|none|350px|QJY-88 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_Type88_Warfare_Pack.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] appears in the &amp;quot;Operation Métro&amp;quot; multiplayer trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk 11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLMk11Mod0.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Mk 11 Mod 0 in-game render. Note lack of any sort of sighting system.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-9A91.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mk11.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mk.11]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from [[Battlefield Play4Free]], once again appearing as the ''[[SVD]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLNDM-86.jpg|thumb|none|350px|NDM-86 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_SVD_killtext.JPG|thumb|none|338px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Svd.jpg|thumb|none|600px|NDM-86 with no optics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|500px|SV-98 - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLSV-98.jpg|thumb|none|350px|SV-98 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Simonov-Russian-SKS45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Russian Simonov Type 45 aka the Russian SKS rifle - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Sks with tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLSKS.jpg|thumb|none|350px|SKS in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sksone.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skstwo.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sksthree.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700#M40A5 Sniper Rifle|M40A5]] is the second bolt-action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M40A5 - 7.62x51mm NATO ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM40A5.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M40A5 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM98B.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M98B in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM39.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M39 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M82A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107|M82A3]] (aka M107) is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it in multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|550px|Barrett M82A3 (aka M107) long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main Battlefield series game (excluding spinoffs like [[Battlefield Play4Free]]), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be mounted on any of the assault rifles in the Assault kit. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, FRAG-12 rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M26 MASS - 12 Gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Standalone version of M26 MASS - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM26.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M26 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870 MCS&amp;quot; in the beta. The player characters pump the shotgun right immediately after fire and very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in the game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be.  Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1.  Using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rem870mcs 14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Remington 870 MCS Entry version - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL870MCS.jpg|thumb|none|350px|870 MCS in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:KH@))@.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The player character shoots an enemy soldier with an 870 MCS.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:870.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The Remington 870 MCS as seen in the open beta.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully extended during gameplay. Should be noted the reload animation shows the player loading the first round into the breach first, then loading the remaining shells underneath shotgun.  Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM1014.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M1014 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga-12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga-12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Saiga-12K - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLSaiga-12K.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Saiga-12K in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Armsel Striker ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#Armsel_Striker|Armsel Striker]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Striker.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Armsel Striker Shotgun - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLStriker.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Striker in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_DAO12_Warfare_Pack.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; pre-order image. Note the Picatinny rail added to the top of the receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:Safdad.JPG|thumb|none|500px|&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game. In the beta, the magazine capacity is 7+1 by standard or 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG-12 rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLUSAS-12.jpg|thumb|none|350px|USAS-12 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLM320.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M320 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|500px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLMk153Mod0.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Mk 153 Mod 0 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Launcher.jpg‎ |thumb|none|350px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] makes a return in Battlefield 3, as it was seen in Operation Metro multiplayer trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLRPG-7V2.jpg|thumb|none|350px|RPG-7V2 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3RPG7.jpg‎ |thumb|none|600px|A soldier with an RPG-7V2 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3RPG.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads an RPG-7V2 in the recent Caspian Border multiplayer trailer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|500px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLFIM-92.jpg|thumb|none|350px|FIM-92 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse (9K38 Igla) ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Igla|SA-18 Grouse]] appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. Oddly, in game it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse (9K38 Igla) launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BL9K38.jpg|thumb|none|350px|9K38 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes, and obviously needs a lock to fire.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3BLFGM-148.jpg|thumb|none|350px|FGM-148 in-game render.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines. In the trailer, it seems to have a pistol grip instead of having the trigger on the back of the weapon behind the sights. The AT4 will only appear in the Singleplayer campaign, most likely due to the fact that it would be redundant to the Mk 153 Mod 0 and RPG-7V2.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3TeaserAT4.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The M136 AT4 is in the hand of the player as the Marines are engaging a sniper hidden in the hotel room from the rooftop.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
During the first encounter, the player is throwing [[M67 hand grenade]]s at PLR militants. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip more by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineet kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
C4 packs can be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Emplaced Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk19BF3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The Humvees at the start of the mission are seen equipped with a Mk 19 grenade launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds strafing ground targets, as well as the UH-1Y Venom, and oddly its Russian counterpart, the Ka-60 Kasatka.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|450px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. The Abrams appear to be fitted with a remote mounting for the M2HB allowing the Commander to fire the weapon from inside the safety of the turret, a feature recently implemented on real-life M1A2's operating in Iraq.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on the T-90A tank, and a number of technicals.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF2 DSHK 1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player mans a technical-mounted Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is co-axially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is co-axially mounted on the T-90A MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|500px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bushmaster M242 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the AH-1Z Viper helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the main gun of the BMP-2, and the secondary armament of the Mi-28 Havoc helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Shipunov 2A42 - 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet fighter jets.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|450px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov GSh-30-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Shipunov GSh-301 appears in the game as the secondary armament of the SU-35BM Flanker-E fighter jet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE GAU-8/A Avenger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[General Electric GAU-8/A Avenger]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the A-10 Thunderbolt II ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GAU-8A.jpg|thumb|500px|none|GAU-8/A Avenger complete with feed system and 1,174 round drum - 30x173mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of the SU-25TM (SU-39) Frogfoot ground attack jet.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GSh-30-2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2 30mm automatic cannon - 30x165mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=473086</id>
		<title>Talk:Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Battlefield_3&amp;diff=473086"/>
		<updated>2011-10-19T13:29:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Makarov PB (6P9) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== All weapons in BF3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list below shows all BF3 weapons that are going to be available either SP or MP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is officially announced by EA, but i'm pretty sure there will be more coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: List has been edited to account for new information (eg: Both M16s and only P90TR) and name corrections (eg: DAO-12 to Striker)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assault Rifles (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A3 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*HK416&lt;br /&gt;
*G3A3&lt;br /&gt;
*AN-94&lt;br /&gt;
*KH2002&lt;br /&gt;
*AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
*F2000&lt;br /&gt;
*AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
*M16A4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*M4A1 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*AKS-74U (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G36C&lt;br /&gt;
*SCAR-H CQC&lt;br /&gt;
*A-91&lt;br /&gt;
*SG553&lt;br /&gt;
*M4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support)&lt;br /&gt;
*M27 IAR (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPK-74M (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M249E2&lt;br /&gt;
*M60&lt;br /&gt;
*M240&lt;br /&gt;
*6P41&lt;br /&gt;
*QYJ 88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.11 Mod.0 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*SVD (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*M40A5&lt;br /&gt;
*SV98&lt;br /&gt;
*M98B&lt;br /&gt;
*M82A3 (not in MP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon)&lt;br /&gt;
*M39 EMR&lt;br /&gt;
*SKS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*P90TR&lt;br /&gt;
*MP7A1&lt;br /&gt;
*UMP45&lt;br /&gt;
*PDR&lt;br /&gt;
*PP2000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*870 MCS&lt;br /&gt;
*M1014&lt;br /&gt;
*USAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
*Saiga 20K&lt;br /&gt;
*Striker&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit)&lt;br /&gt;
*M9 (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*MP443 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*G17&lt;br /&gt;
*M-45&lt;br /&gt;
*MP412&lt;br /&gt;
*T44&lt;br /&gt;
*93R&lt;br /&gt;
*G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Underbarrels (Assault)&lt;br /&gt;
*M320 with HE/Smoke/Buckshot rounds&lt;br /&gt;
*M26 MASS with Buckshot/Flechette/Frag/Slug rounds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rocket Launchers (Engineer)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mk.153 SMAW (US)&lt;br /&gt;
*RPG-7 (RU)&lt;br /&gt;
*FGM-148 Javelin&lt;br /&gt;
*FIM-92 Stinger&lt;br /&gt;
*SA-18 IGLA&lt;br /&gt;
*AT4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
( Source: http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ ) --Zzang1847 23.09.2011 11.07 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is from a Batlefield 3 fansite and not acctualy offical --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 14:38, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This has been discussed before. While it is technically official since the official gaming news sources are also reporting it, but since there aren't any pictures of 'em you have to wait.--[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 15:55, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pages without pictures or info look ugly. The game's out in less than a month, and the Beta's out in a few days, we can wait, but it does mean we get to know what's in the game anyway, even though it's not on the page :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:20, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although there were no pictures, i believe we still can at least put some description and real picture so someone who is actually uploading in-game pictures don't have to worry about putting explanation and finding pictures from the archive, which takes significant amount of time (in terms of AAA games like this).&lt;br /&gt;
::P.S) Sorry about this discussion already mentioned before. I thought i could give some help, but perhaps i'm not :( ~ Zzang1847 23.09.2011 8.43 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Building an article is not a race, there is just less than a week for the Beta to roll in, not that much to wait. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:52, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like it is going to just be Americans, Russians, Generic &amp;quot;Not the Taliban, honest&amp;quot; Middle Eastern Militia and possibly the Iranian army as factions then. Damn. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 10:28, 24 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For SP yeah, but for MP it's been confirmed to be just US and RU. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:46, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faction Specific Weaponry details ==&lt;br /&gt;
no need to worry , about faction specific weaponry , reading through some of Alan Kertz earlier posts.He states that the player once leveled up high enough in the class's levels will gain access to the other factions weaponry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun disparity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have the feeling the M4A1 will be the counterpart to the AKS74U. This is wrong, but every game seems to do it. The M4 has a 14.5 inch barrel and is a standard issue weapon. The AKS74U has an 8.3 inch barrel and is issued to vehicle crews. A better setup would be Mk 18 Mod O (or HK416 D10RS) vs the AKS74U. Also, the M16 and AK74 aren't exactly equal either. Maybe pair up the regular M4A1 or SCAR-L with 14.5 inch barrel (for variety) with the AK74?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and what do you think the US/EU counterparts to the SKS, RPK and AS Val will be? There's no US counterpart cartridge to the 7.62x39 and 9x39 as far as I know.&lt;br /&gt;
::There's no val, that's vss&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:SKS = Mk.11 = SVD. RPK = M27. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:52, 9 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its the asval not vss :S.[[User:lukewilliams010]] 12:14 ,19 august 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM\PKP operation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've yet to see a game that properly portraits PKM operation with its 2 level feeding system and non-disintegrating belts. Curious if in BF3 they'll get it right. Doubt it though...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optic mounts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Optic mounts on all russian weapons are wrong. Basically it's an PSO with optic tube cut off and rail slapped instead of it. Then every Russian scope has its original mount removed so it can be fixed on that picatinny rail. They also didn't bother making [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/1789/i-2863.jpg proper mount] for PKP and just put rail on top of the receiver lid. I was expecting more attention to details in BF3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well the Russian army IS starting to use RIS, just look at the AK-9. [http://world.guns.ru/assault/rus/ak-9-e.html] While it does seem a bit sloppy, it can be justified in a way. At least it isn't as bad as that AK-abomination from MW2 and the RPD with rails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know when the beta is starting? cant wait for it! --[[Special:Contributions/109.78.246.33|109.78.246.33]] 21:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or for that matter, how we can get in on it? [[User:That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck|That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get into the Battlefield 3 beta, you need to buy specially-marked versions of the recent Medal Of Honor [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya i got it, do you know when were getting the codes?--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 02:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no clue.[[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you registered your Medal of Honor with your EA-Account, you'll get the invitation and infos, as soon as there is something, so far nothing is known.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wish I could try the beta [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not just you, after the videos they releases pretty much everybody is dying to get hands on the game. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 12:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beta will be open to everyone. Those who got MoH, will get in earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-something-something ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check that dude in the BG. also what I think *might* be a holster, but I'm probably wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf6.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's definitely an AK-series rifle, which one I can't be sure of. If I had to guess however, I'd say either an AK-74, AK-74M, or AK-101. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 08:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a dump bag on his hip. At least that's what I think it is. It definitely isn't a holster though, since most drop leg holsters are strapped to your thigh. Why a guy with a belt fed machine gun has a dump bag through is beyond me.--[[User:1SAZ|1SAZ]] 09:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If I had to guess, he may have been issued an M4 or M16 and picked up the MG prior to the pic being taken. You can also see some STANAG mag pouches on the front of his vest too. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I Agree with  Orca1, I know you can't see from the distance, but the profile of the muzzle looks like one of those 3. As the game is set in 2014, im assuming it's either an AK-74M or AK-101. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M240G is M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M240G is actually a M240B as seen by gameplay screenshots. You can also identify it's M240B by the heat shield. I guess that inaccuracy in every war game (including new games) will always be. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I knew it was some kind of M240 variant, but since it was being used by a Marine I assumed it was the 240-Golf variant since they typically use that instead of the 240-Bravo. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wrong use of the word &amp;quot;anachronistic&amp;quot; there. An anachronism is an object, event, or person portrayed in a chronologically inaccurate time period. The Marines using the M240B is a mistake, no doubt, but it's not an anachronism as the M240B still does technically ''exist'' at the same time beside the Golf model. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 22:42, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got these pics off BF3 nation;&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf1.jpg appears to be some M16 varient which oddly enough doesnt have any rear sights.&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3nation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bf5.jpg Another shot of the M16 like weapon (Just going to mention the nice detail on the mag). And hey, new weapon, A COFFEE MUG!!! &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GunGunGun|GunGunGun]] 15:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an M16A4, the developers probably didn't detailed the weapon enough. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 16:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this as well. Im guessing they just forgot, The sights are even not there in the gameplay videos. I do hope they change it though, might seen a little silly firing with neither iron sights or optics. --[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 13:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the new 12 min trailer, roughly at the 7min mark when they put surpessive fire on the sniper, is it me or does the guy on the left, with the M16A4 fire full auto?. [[User:Sike|Sike]] 17:20, 18 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm commenting without checking, but remember how fast you can fire the M16A4 and 93R in BC2? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:23, 19 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racking charging handle when reloading after empty ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new trailer showed you shooting an M4 and when you are empty, you reload but instead of pressing the bolt release, you charge the handle. I seriously hope this isn't the default reload [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 04:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the begining of the trailer, it did say that it was pre-alpha code.  They'll hopefully have the modeling and other animations fixed by then.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 05:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, cause I'm getting bad flashbacks to games in early 2000 that pulls the charging handle when doing mid mag reloads [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I remember correctly, the M16A2 &amp;amp; M4A1 reloading animations from ''[[Battlefield 2|BF2]]'' had the character use the charging handle instead of the bolt release when reloading, they may have borrowed that. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 05:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3D modeling and animation is kinda hard to &amp;quot;borrow&amp;quot; from older engine/file format. I'd guess it's probably &amp;quot;director thinks this looks more dynamic&amp;quot; like [[Black]], or maybe the animator is under heavy influence of games in early 2000 :/ [[User:Ssate|Ssate]] 02:43, 12 April 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I hope they change it to using bolt release because it's wield for someone to do that unless you're clearing a malfunction [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 06:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm liking how they now keep track of a round in the chamber and you don't go through the whole reloading animation, maybe this time we'll have proper pistol reloads.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 19:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; pistol reload? [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 20:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think he meant that the slide does not lock back when the pistol runs out, like in Medal Of Honor MP. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 20:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in Bad Company and the second one they did the same thing where the slide didn't lock back. If it's one thing Modern Warfare has done right is the reload animation...well except maybe for the ACR. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was also a problem with the SPAS-12: the character pump it after the reload even if there was a shell in the chamber. Same in Black Ops. Not to mention that &amp;quot;all pistols were DAO&amp;quot; since the hammers never move. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 08:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About reloads, in last years Metal of Honor, you do a combat reload when your shotgun is empty. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 22:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another nice touch that they put in was that they left the front sight on the M4 even though it has an optical sight.  In most games the front sight is either removed completely (like Bad Company 2 or Call of Duty 4) or else it has a flip down front sight (like Modern Warfare 2).  Adds a nice level of realism in my opinion.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 06:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I always thought removing the front sight from M4/M16 rifles in games was utterly stupid mall ninja BS, not to mention making the gun look ugly as sin. In a real-world situation, if your optic fails and you don't have any iron sights to fall back on, you're basically SOL while the other guy who's never even heard of a red dot sight is still capable of sending rounds your way. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 10:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't some optics already mount back-up irons (BUS / BUIS) on them? [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:46, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I noticed this too. All BF games seem to get reloads completely wrong. You get the feeling the make you rack the charging handle with a mid mag reload to clear the current round so they don't have to take it into account. As awesome as charging the action yourself, or racking the top slide looks, you just never do it during a normal reload. I do hope they change this yeah, but I doubt they will looking back at the other games. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE Battlefield games, but I don't see how its that hard to get weapons right when they hire Ex-military guys to get everything else right. You can even find these things on Google these days. And with COD removing the iron sights on the M16s and M4s they are also removing the gas block. The gun would have to fire one round and then the action be charged manually. I love these games, but some times the ignorance they show towards the things they claim are most important pisses me off a bit.--[[User:Chablar|Chablar]] 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, at least they don't go the extra mile and have guns being fired with the safety on, I can think of a couple of games that do that. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 14:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The use of military and ex-military people are for realistic look of the soldiers, their movements, they communications, and look of ground vehicles and aircraft... But don't forget that it is not that hard to search for photos in the internet of weapons, vehicles, aircraft, uniforms, equipment, etc. and create it in the computer, without using the help of the military guys. As what we see know. BF3 goes for the realistic way, that's right, but it is not realistic in the small details. CoD4:MW, CoD:MW2, CoD:BO, the new MoH, OFP series, ArmA series, and of course the series of BF from BF2 and onwards have so many unrealistic small details that can be fixed easily by using mod tools. The developers doesn't really care if the M4A1 has gas block (CoD) or if you charge the weapon with the charging handle (BF2, BF3), they just want to create a game, realistic or not just the gamers will be happy. It is a bit funny as so many things are so realistic in this game but someone who has good military knowledge will notice right away for the f*** ups. In OFP:RR for example, they only thing that bothers me is that the M16A4 in-game looks like the Canadian C7 rifle. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 18:50, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
don't forget in MW2, fans were commenting that the rear flip up sight on the SCAR was backwards and would back towards the shooter and not forward. IW didn't change it cause they don't care of the little details. Also I like to see a game where they have a random chance to destroy your optic so can you actually can flip up your irons. After the EMP in MW2, they forgot that pretty much all the M4s and SCARS had flip up sights but none of them bothered to flip them up. That'll be the first thing I noticed when I aim or the fact that the ACOG is not electronic and would still work when an EMP hits. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 19:43, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let's not forget MW2 is the same game which showed the Model 1887 being reloaded by having every cartridge put into the barrel. Would certainly make for an interesting first shot... [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 19:58, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In the words of the Demo Man from ''[[Team Fortress 2]]'', &amp;quot;Ka-BOOM!&amp;quot; :P [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 20:18, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New behind-the-scenes footage reveals that there are partial reload animations --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 20:16, 5 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked how ''[[Project Reality]]'' completely replaced the M16/M4 reload animation from ''BF2''; the only time the charging handle is messed with is when you first bring the weapon up, and even then it's more of a brass check than a full pull back. The reloading animation has you swap the mags, hit the bolt release, and check the ejection port. Much more realistic reloading animation. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 07:03, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I wish is adding different animation for reloads. If you are in the middle of an intense fire fight, you reload and press the bolt faster and you randomly fumble with your reload cause it happens. Or if the firefight is over, you do a more slow reload. Also if the gun has flip up sights, I want to see an animation where you actually flip those irons up [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:02, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think I'd be happy with the former; same as random jams or giving singleplayer enemies a chance of getting an instakill headshot on the player, it isn't much fun having the game secretly flipping a coin to decide if you get screwed or not. ''Black'' did slower reloads if you weren't being fired at, though; it either sped the whole animation up or skipped the unnecessary wanking around if you were being shot at when you pressed reload. [[User:Vangelis|Vangelis]] 11:50, 8 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing about leaving the front sight post on the M4s is that the red dot sight is raised and not like in COD4 where it is mounted on the rail. Maybe in real life, having 2 eyes would sort of work, but even then you can still have a front post bother your eye looking at it. It wouldn't be a clear shot [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 11:04, 6 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only game I've seen that gets it all right is Crysis 2, and the weapons are all fictional, though they could all easily exist. It's got both reload animations (six actually, because you do them different in Armour or Stealth mode), +1 in the chamber, attachments on your gun based on where they're mounted (one optic, a suppressor or no suppressor, and an underbarrel), believable damages based on calibres, functioning pistol hammers, and pistol slides that lock back when empty and not as part of the reload animation (meaning you can run around and stuff with a locked empty pistol). [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:02, 16 March 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKM ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the left on the bridge an enemy soldier have a Pkm machine gun :&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Battlefield3_Gogogo.jpg (high resolution sorry) [[User:Arrak|Arrak]]&lt;br /&gt;
:PKP&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disable Vehicles == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New info at Kotaku and others mentions &amp;quot;Temporarily disabling vehicles&amp;quot;. I'm thinking it may be some sort of EMP thing, though, even for BF that's a stretch. What would be preferable, is if for instance... a tank... had several parts that were damageable. Things like treads, optics, engines, etc could be disabled in order to halt a tank. Same goes with tires and stuff like that with other vehicles. This'd be really cool in my opinion, for instance, snipers could damage the optics of a tank with say a .50 BMG round, temporarily of course. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:23, 3 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 Carry Handle Fix ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If anybody's seen the EA PWNED BF3 episode, it looks like they've added the carry handle to the M16A4. Two short clips demonstrating the ANT animation system that show the M16A4 with it. Good stuff. Also, did anyone notice how they're making prone realistic? It seems they're having the player's elbows be fixed rotateable spots along with the player's spine being able to bend a certain number of degrees. In order to rotate around, the player has to physically crawl over to view that area. It's easy to see in the animation demos that I referred to, but it's also noticeable on the 12 minute trailer when the Marines are on the rooftop, watch the perspective of the player's weapon and how it moves in relation to the arms. Very cool indeed, because I know balancing prone has always been a problem with BF. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 09:15, 30 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiplayer Teaser ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there is a MP teaser up on www.origin.com, looks like they have gone and screwed the m4 up, (removed front site) [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:22, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't get a good enough look at the gas block to tell. Anywho... I spotted the M16A4, a Mk 46/M249, M9 pistol, the PKM Pencheng, SVD, Mk 11/SR-25 (Not a M110, no full URX rail), AKS-74, and the Grach pistol. All but the SVD and Grach are viewable in the trailer, the AKS-74, SVD, and Grach are visible in the corner where it lists the kills. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 16:36, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2011-battlefield-3/714884 pause at 0:19 for the M4, [[User:Sike|Sike]] 16:42, 6 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The AKS-74U screenshot shows what appears to be an enemy carrying two [[RPG-7]] launchers. Can't tell if they have optics or straight iron sights. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 14:56, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who put the Mk 11 as the 9A-91? Travesty, stoked that the Mk 11 is in though. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:30, 7 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This photo was posted on battlefields facebook page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that while the US gets an M-4A1 with and without optics, the Russians/PLR get an AK-74M.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mattatack92|Mattatack92]] 00:54, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might've just been the loadouts they had for E3, doesn't necessarily confirm faction specific weaponry. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:00, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is that PSO-1 or the same unidentified sight from Medal of Honor? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They modelled receiver lid locking knob wrongly. Should be like [http://content.foto.mail.ru/mail/photoshooter/708/i-711.jpg this]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physical Warfare Pack ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New weapons, folks!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.totalgamingnetwork.com/content.php?4305-Battlefield-3-Limited-Edition-Physical-Warfare-Pack-Available-for-Preorder-in-UK Battlefield 3 Limited Edition: Physical Warfare Pack Available for Preorder in UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time for article update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:08, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I see they're calling it the DAO-12 again. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:14, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Type 88 (and it seems the Bipod is an attachment), &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; lol, with Flechette ammo, aaaaaaaand... a Flash Suppressor for the &amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle&amp;quot;!!!! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:44, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;SKS Sniper Rifle?&amp;quot; So we're set in California? Watch out, the bad guys have high-capacity 15-round magazines! [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:56, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isn't the SKS 10 rounds though? I never really liked the look of the SKS, but I've seen a lot of people on this site post about wanting it in a game for once, so it'll make all them happy :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:37, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm just talking generally; you know, scary handguns with high-capacity magazines and laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings and gangland bayonet charges. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:45, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Haha, yeah, I'm from Canada, and while we don't actually have as strict laws as, say, California, what we have is lots of paperwork and time spent training for licenses, etc. Making them harder to get and needing more knowledge about them is way better than just banning them. I never understood that, oooo, a bayonet mount, oh no! A pistol grip? They'll kill us so much more efficiently now! Criminals use illegally bought weapons that aren't registered. And that guy that comes home to find his wife is cheating on him? He's so mad he'll kill both of them, and they think he won't just get a knife or something? I'm not supporting killing people, but people would still do it even if all the firearms on Earth went away. We were pretty damn good at it for the thousands of years before we invented them... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:36, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Agreed :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:26, 26 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still no update? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:16, 8 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'laws to rid the streets of the scourge of drive-by rifle grenadings' - I lol'd --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:11, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why in the hell would they make the SKS a 'Sniper Rifle'? I mean calling the Dragunov a true sniper rifle is pretty much... wrong, I'm okay with it though, but an SKS? &lt;br /&gt;
I'll admit I'm not very experienced with the SKS myself, maybe it's a tack driver in disguise, but from what I've heard it's just a little more accurate than your standard AK47 and that's not saying much.... --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 12:56, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well there are only going to be semi-auto sniper rifles, so really, there are only DMRs anyway. It's not like it's a sniper class, it's a recon class, so that's not missnamed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:59, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Source? There's no way they'd make all the sniper rifles semi-automatic. We've only seen semi-automatics, yes, but there's no confirmation that they'll -all- be semi-automatic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 20:09, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I got out of the Recon description here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/08/battlefield-3-at-e3-roundup.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-auto and C4. That could just mean default, and you still get bolt-actions and the mortar later, but I really think they mean they removed both of those, to balance the issues with those two things in BC2. Everyone uses Recon, everyone hides with a one hit kill sniper rifle, and everyone calls in their magic mortars from anywhere onto anything. It looks like they're trying to make the Recon kit more of a DMR kit than a true sniper, which is probably better, it fits the squad play better as a DMR and a support gunner do the same job, one with high amounts of precision, the other with high amounts of ammo. On a different note, I'm pretty sure the M4A1 will be in the engineer kit because it has a flashlight and will be the counterpart to the AKS-74U, like the M16A4 and AK-74M. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:36, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: They meant at the E3 demo, the Recon class has a semi-automatic sniper rifle. At the E3 Demo. Hence the &amp;quot;E3 Roundup&amp;quot; title, it's not dismissing anything, just saying what they saw at E3. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 21:47, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:12, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M249 SAW is actually Mk. 46 Mod 0? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By looking at the handgurads, I noticed that they are sticking out like the Mk. 46 Mod 0's handguards instead of the flat M249 SAW's heatshield. Also, because the weapon is fitted with M145 ECLAN scope, this could be the same model as in Medal of Honor, only it is rendered differently or something like that to fit Battlefield 3's engine. So, could be? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 03:54, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yep, it's for sure the Mk 46. Though, it's all one nacho. Glad with the weapon choices they're going with so far. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 10:34, 9 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Glad to see the M145 MGO, presumably in place of the ACOG. Nice touch. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:13, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yep, there's also some speculation that there'll be multiple types of 4x optics for each weapon, like you could put the Elcan on an M4. But I think it's more likely that each weapon will just have a different model of ACOG-type optic. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:27, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's the case, I'm putting the ELCAN on the M16A4, and if there's camo I'm making it green :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Canadian, eh? :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the screenshot is too low to tell if it's an M249 or a Mark 46. The key difference between the two is that the M249 has a magazine well on the side of the receiver for using M16 mags, but the Mark 46 doesn't. You can't really tell if the SAW in this game has a mag well or not. I also want to point out that the SAW in MoH has a magazine well, which would make it an M249. ;) [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:06, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P90 in IGN preview ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/117/1172554/battlefield-3-20110606090440594-000.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the magazine looks like its either missing or modeled way to small&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/117/1172554p1.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sorry i dont know how to embed an image [[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:54, 10 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's a clear model error...the magazine is lodged inside the weapon at an angle and the charging handles are floating above the magazine in midair.&lt;br /&gt;
however, the magazine looks like its of appropriate size and its transparent....would be a nice touch if the bullets inside would actually be visible and move.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May perhaps point to an extended magazines type system, though you'd expect the studio to realise that the P90 feeds from the rear so this wouldn't function --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:09, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are Extended Magazines, you can see them in the loadout window in some of the E3 footage on a PKP Pecheneg. But, what the P90 is likely, is just a pre-alpha mess-up. The magazine is there and properly sized, its' just angled downward into the weapon/barrel. It's not married properly to the P90 and is likely just a glitch that will be fixed. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 08:29, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, pretty cool that things such as extended magazines have made it into BF3 --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:22, 12 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just saw the latest video where the M4A1 had a holo-sight and the gas block was removed. Looks like this will be just another unrealistic game after all. But at least the character pressed the BCRB instead of pulling the charging handle. Damn it, when will a new Rainbow Six game come out?! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:38, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not a big deal. The M4A1 still kills people and looks great. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 14:47, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I might be a bit annoying to have every game M4 lose its gas block, but it really doesn't matter THAT much, and it makes the scope view clearer. To say that it will be &amp;quot;just another unrealistic game&amp;quot; because of that is silly, just pretend it has one of those super mini gas blocks, you wouldn't even be able to see it anyway. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:57, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The problem is that I don't want to have a clear view because soldiers do not have clear view ALL the time. And there is a nice little thing called &amp;quot;flat-top riser&amp;quot;. One might wonder why was it invented.... - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 17:07, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But they're ugly and no one uses them. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:45, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be cool if removing gas block was optional and made gun bolt-action. Talk about killing with skill :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bolt-action sniper rifles will be usable without scopes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some Weapon Spots ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Continuously updated) This video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwT6x7zEQ8c) shows on the kill-feed that the SVD makes a return for Battlefield 3 at 2:20. At 3:48 you see an enemy in the engineer class holding what appears to be an RPG-7 at 3:48. The kill-feed shows at 4:06 a MP-443 pistol. Clear look at an RPG-7 with on the back of an enemy soldier with the rocket (quite dangerously) inserted at 6:03 and again at 7:23. --[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 16:32, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Team Specific Weapons? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the AKS-74U pictures it looks scarily like that's a US Marine using it on Spetsnaz. As far as I know there'll be unlockables and selectable weapons, but does anyone know if these are team specific or not? I'm personally pretty worried we're going to have a bunch of marines in state of the art gear running around with AK rifles because a bunch of bars say they're the best, or PLR using M4s and 249's, that's as bad, if not worse. --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 17:26, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's only in MP, it's the same as Bad Company 2, I never liked being restricted to team weapons im MP. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The player could've picked the weapon up... We don't know for sure about faction specific loadouts. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 23:54, 17 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally liked the faction specific loadouts in BF2, it was realistic. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:40, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:True, to be honest I'd be happy either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:49, 18 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope they bring back faction specific weapons from Battlefield 2. Medal of Honor made it right at first but then you got the opposing faction's guns and faction-specificness pretty much lost its purpose :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But in BF2 if you killed a enemy you can pick up his &amp;quot;kit&amp;quot; and use his weapons... - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:08, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, first you had to kill an enemy, then you could pick his stuff (kit). But for Battlefield 3 it should be weapon (more realistic than insta-crossdressing xD ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:12, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your right, lol. XD - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:25, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually in BC2 your character model never changed when you swaped kits, you could have a medic carrying a sniper rifle, or a ghillie guy with an RPG-7. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah right, I forgot. :\&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lol, you forgot about rocket launcher-wielding snipers ;) Hey, we should put a pic of that under the rocket section or something, you know, just for kicks. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:05, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::lol yeah. The reason I don't remember is because I only played with bots, I only had Dial-up back then. u_u - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:34, 20 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope its not side specific, I always hated that considering how two weapons from the same class where completely different and handled different. Most people would end up using unlocked guns that you can use on either side. If you want a game thats realistic as possible, play Operation Flashpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Being a fan of Battlefield 2, which featured faction specific weapons, I'm offended someone is saying me to play another game. I might as well say: If you want a game thats unrealistic as possible, play Call of Duty. By the way, in Medal of Honor opposing factions' weapons had identical stats, so that wouldn't be a problem for Battlefield 3 (probably). Also, sign your posts (paragraphs?) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well since OpFor is using a AK-74M and AKS-74U which is some-what comparable to the M16A4 and M4A1, I say the game is gonna be fairly balanced. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: If they use weapon balance from MoH then yes. Because in BF2 M16A2 and M4A1 kinda sucked (better use G36E and SCAR-L unlocks, respectively). However AK-101 and AKS-74U were ''nice'' (damage)! Check their stats here: [http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison BF2 Weapons Comparison] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^^But those games kinda sucked (at least Dragon Rising, Red River looks good). :\ Whatever, I personally like faction specific weapons for my reasons above. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 14:27, 22 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To be honest, Dragon Rising didn't suck, it was just buggy and laggy (which can be said about pretty much every other shooter, at least as start) and didn't have weapon customization (which can be said about Battlefield 2). In my opinion it is Red River which sucked, basically being Co-op CoD:MW with Visible Walls of Block being replaced by Invisible Walls of Doom and auto regeneration being replaced by manual healing. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:52, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Meh, that's why I said ''kinda'' sucky, lol I heard AAII is much worst, as its severely buggy and lacks weapon animations and others. P.S. I prefer manual healing over mutant regenerating health any day, the only place 3 second regenerating health belongs is a Wolverine game. :\  - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:47, 23 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::To be honest, manual healing in Red River isn't ''that'' much different from auto regeneration: hold &amp;quot;use&amp;quot; key while not getting hit and several seconds later you are good to go. Whether Dragon Rising had an actual Medic class just like Battlefield :) Oh, and it's kinda hard to make complex game without ''a lot'' of technical problems and unfinished things, yes ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if you want actual realism at this point, you go ArmA 2, not Operation Flashpoint: We-screwed-over-an-already-great-franchise-by-making-a-game-with-casual-gamers-in-mind[[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 03:06, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want actual realism at this point, you go to Army. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh, But ArmA II had NO weapon animations, that's kinda a big &amp;quot;unfinished thing&amp;quot; when you publish the game! And you Mr. Masterius, your obnoxious, why don't ''you'' go join the Army. We're talking about wanting realistic combat games not what peoples career decisions should be. -_-  [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:04, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Wolf, one thing you should realise: until Virtual Reality is created and gone into mass production, games will never, NEVER be trully realistic. Holding gun in your hands =\= Mouse+Keyboard. Also, mine is not obnoxious, mine is very nice and tidy :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:36, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::::And what's so wrong with wanting realism in &amp;quot;Mouse+Keyboard&amp;quot; games? Also I have handled, extensively trained, and fired many REAL firearms, so I'm not just some armchair-commando or a mall-ninja. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 19:18, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Eventually FPSs will be the player wearing a mocap suit with a mocap gun, in a mocap room with a floor that moves (like a treadmill) so you can run places. And you will be forced to reload the weapon properly etc. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:25, 24 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The first steps are made :D [http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/xio-ultimate-fps-virtual-reality-gaming-exoskeleton-prototype-video-21-04-2011/ XIO Gaming VR Simulator Prototype] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:54, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd settle for having a decent field of view, right now. They're actually getting narrower rather than wider as the gun attempts to colonise roughly a quarter of the screen. Kinda sad when the guy in ''Doom'' held his pistol in a more sensible way than the guy in ''Crysis 2'' does; the latter seems to be holding it with the base of his right palm rested against his nose. Sure, we're not all going to own an IMAX globe theatre any time soon to have a full 180 degrees or so of vision, but it gets silly when your FOV is ~30 degrees these days when most of the old shooters did 70-90. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed your post? Maybe we both tried to edit at the same time, because it wasn't there when I did, sorry about that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:34, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol @ me. Should have known someone was going to say that... Should have added &amp;quot;In a Video game&amp;quot;... [[User:5t3v0|5t3v0]] 08:00, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Right 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:51, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's alright, danke. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:31, 25 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More Stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe. I didn't see anything listed here that we don't have, but they seem to know what they're talking about. (Near the bottom)&lt;br /&gt;
http://enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:17, 4 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett MRAD/98B spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the &amp;quot;Classes Explained&amp;quot; screenshot...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x80/cowboyw54/Bf3render.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:07, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool, I'd never heard of that rifle before, looks like a good addition. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:37, 5 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like they call Picatinny Railed M16A4 '''M16A2''' ''again'' *facepalm*. Oh, and that's a weird sniper rifle. Don't they have '''M110''' for that?&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. And yeah, same goes for '''DAO-12''' (Armsel Striker, duh!). But I would prefer '''Armsel Protecta''' (it's more modern after all ;) ) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:01, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually they are calling it '''M-16a2'''... nuff said! - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 05:14, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it was called &amp;quot;Blarg Rifle&amp;quot; but had correct reloads, I'd be happy. Where did it say they called it an A2 anyway? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:03, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://bf3blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bf3-classes.jpg here] [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 07:50, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh right, well, it might say &amp;quot;M-16a2&amp;quot;, but it calls the MRAD a &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; Sniper Rifle, so, we'll see. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:19, 7 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well I think that the &amp;quot;Mk. II&amp;quot; is the Mk II Mod 0 (SR-25), and that they just threw the text on there because the Mk II will be the default Recon rifle. &lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I think this 99% confirms that it will be in the game, should it be added to the main page?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:28, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OH Mk.11, I thought it said Mk.2, and I couldn't figure out what the hell that would be. Yeah, we've seen the SR-25 already in that multiplayer footage, and everything in that video was default. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:05, 10 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So MoH had the M110 when it should have had the Mark 11, but BF3 now has the Mark 11 when it should have the M110 (USMC recently dropped the Mark 11 in favor of the M110)? *Facepalm* [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:27, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Indeed. Another thing about MoH is that apparently Mark 14 Mod 0 got finished in 2003 and got shipped to Navy SEALs in 2004[http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=377] thus making it as chronologically incorrect as M110. Devs usually tend to skip the details. Still, the crown of ignorance goes to CoD brand. The latest MW3 seems to have customized AK-47 *Major Facepalm* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:39, 10 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes about in-game ACOG scopes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there seem to be two separate models of ACOG scopes available in the game, according to the screenshots posted in the article. The M4A1 carbine the player character uses in the 'Faultline' trailer is fitted with a camo-painted TA01NSN ACOG(identifiable by the integral iron sights and lack of a fiber-optic strip along the top) while one of the M16A4's shown in first-person view in the article here is equipped with a TA31F ACOG. This is the second FPS game I've seen to do this, the other being ''[[Project Reality]]'' (itself a mod of ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', coincidentally) which has the TA31F and TA31RCO ACOG models available in it. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 03:44, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...While in the average FPS, you're lucky if the thing called the ACOG looks like anything in Trijicon's product line. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:47, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Making the public in general think every scope is called an ACOG :P Also, in terms of 4x sights, theres the M249s ELCAN, and I'm hoping you can put any optic on anything. One of the DICE guys said there's a crazy amount of optics in BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:26, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Even in COD: Black Ops (a game that takes place in the 60s mind you) they have a scope called a ACOG, even though it's obviously ''not'' a ACOG *rolls eyes*. Game Devs are becoming fails more and more every year. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:08, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Treyarch basically made their own Modern Warfare, with blackjack and hookers. So yeah, forget about proper portray of Cold War. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:41, 13 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Give me the ability to slap the Elcan onto the M240 and I will be happy. Hope what you said about the 'crazy amount of optics' turns out to be true. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:34, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope you're not confusing the ELCAN scope with the similar M145 MGO. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are correct, I did mean the MGO. I know the M145 is different, I just though the Elcan name was interchangeable. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 13:15, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It would be nice to see a broader array of optics customizations in FPS games. ''Project Reality'' has a pretty good variety, but you have to switch out your entire class loadout in order to change this, and most weapons only have 1 or 2 optics available aside from iron sights (the M4A1 has the widest variety; having available EOTech, M68 Aimpoint, Kimber Mepro, &amp;amp; ITL MARS red dots as well as both TA31F &amp;amp; TA31RCO ACOGs as mentioned above). [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 12:05, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, that Project Reality has been mentioned... I hope DICE won't disappoint the CIS players, so that we can kick yer capitalist arses in proper way... j/k lol :P Anyway, here are the articles for those interested: [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/1P29 for AK-74M] and [http://ra.spetsnaz.su/wiki/PKP for PKP]. And the [http://www.npzoptics.com/catalog/sights_for_small_arms/ full catalog]. Oh, and it's been suggested on [http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-3/1405448-optics-lots-optics-2.html#post19418223 EA's Forums], so I don't have to do it myself. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:24, 11 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mocap Guns ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a challenge for everyone; what are the two wire guns standing in for?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2nd Story&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or if it's off the list after a while:&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab1.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
http://media.enterbf3.com/images/mcnab2.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cornershot and a Thompson with M203? :P [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:lolz. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:51, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More seriously, that thing McNab has is definately supposed to be a carbine with an underbarrel accessory, I can't really see what else it could be. The other guy's weapon is a bit more of a mystery; since it doesn't have any kind of projection for a magazine, I'd guess it's something like a Bizon; can't be a P90, these rigs are for capturing hand positions and his would be completely wrong for that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wait, actually it does have a magazine, I see a curved MP5-style mag just in front of his finger. So, maybe it's an MP5 with some underbarrel device making the front end all chunky, or one of those MP10 things like in GTAIV. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:40, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOL Tommy with M203 :) The one on the right really looks like an M14 EBR to me, the mag, handguard, and barrel, but the other one is weird. It looks like an MP5 pistol grip and mag, with a really bulky front, and a stock that looks familiar, bu I just can't place. :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:09, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://riflestocks.com/store/product2.html ACE side-folding skeleton stock]? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:48, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that's the one! Hmm, is there anything in particular that's on, aftermarket or otherwise? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:29, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Quick google gets me mostly AK-pattern weapons. AK, Saiga, Galil, that kind of thing. Couple on MACs, not that it's likely to be one of those. Maybe that's what a MoCap AKS-74U looks like? :s [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:36, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'd say that's the best guess so far [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:13, 15 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dunno, such a stock shape reminds me of [http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:G36.jpg G36E] which was in Battlefield 2 (with railz instead of optics). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not sure about that, you'd have thought if it was G36E the mocap prop would have a rod or something stuck to the end to represent the rest of the barrel like the one McNab has. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Bah, I am not really into guessing the gun by the mocap. Details of it - OK, but generally it's just a mishmash that can be used for anything provided the grip is adequate xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:51, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually the ACE stock is found on the SPAS 15 as well (which was in Bad Company 1, and Battlefield 2 I think) probably the most likely choice. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 18:48, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope it's that, that was the ONLY weapon that didn't come back in BC2 for some reason. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:44, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But it returned in [[Battlefield Play4Free#Franchi SPAS-15|Battlefield Play4Free]] so its appearance in BF3 is possible ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 23:20, 18 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 unlock spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... in a promotional shot from Dice about their Battlelog service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x599/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:02, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was also seen in the EA Pwned video, along with the G3 (mentioned), I forgot to add that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:06, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I hope this Glock 17 actually holds... well... 17 rounds. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:24, 20 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the MP-443 does, so that could work, I'm thinking there's gonna be a Euro faction, with the Glock as the sidearm, and we've also seen the P90. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:17, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now that reminds me... Battlefield 2: Modern Combat (console version of Battlefield 2) had [[ Battlefield 2: Modern Combat#Glock 17 Pistol|Glock 17]] as Euro Sidearm :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:44, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It did? Awesome! I was just guessing, but that basically confirms it :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:54, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here's some leaked gameplay for you guys, skip to 1:44, there's your Glock. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfeOoEDYEt0) Would appear that the sidearms (at least) are not faction specific. Also looks like it holds 18 rounds but I'm assuming this is a '+1' affair. [[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:00, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Melee Animation is good :D Reloading after every bullet isn't :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha Footage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
no doubt some of you have heard there is a closed alpha trial going on, and some of you may have watched the leaked footage online. i dont want to post links to these videos just incase its not aloud.&lt;br /&gt;
but i can tell you, that the G36c, Glock 17, M27 IAR, SV98, MP7 and M1014 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:24, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Closed Alpha? Any news about Closed Beta for MoH: Limited Edition owners? It should be before Open Beta, shouldn't it? :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A pretty nice selection of weapons appearing which is good to see, particularly the M27. Now just need someone to spot the L85 and I'll be happy \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:19, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess it, Russian counterpart to M27 is going to be RPK-74M :O And British - L86? ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:41, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You may possibly be right, and I hope you are. If it's in there, first person to deliver the information wins a shiny medal from myself :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:48, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::looks like US support starts with the M27, and the Russians start with RPK, british forces arent in the game... --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 13:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The existence of other factions hasn't been denied (to my knowledge) but even so I hope either weapon is available --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 15:02, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Germans aren't in the game and there's a G36C. We can't rule anything out. Plus, there's always the possibility of DLC. [[User:Halorocka888|Halorocka888]] 19:31, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::New factions/weapons added via DLC would be grand. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:50, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Yeah, like they did with Euro Forces Pack for Battlefield 2 :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've yanked the images off the page; as with the MW3 stuff, posting images from leaks is not allowed. Wait until they show up in something official. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why does it even matter? We should post everything about everything we know... :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:36, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Same reason we don't allow pirated or leaked movie footage; using that kind of thing reflects badly on the site. We can wait until these weapons are confirmed in official materials (which they will be in due course, I'm sure), we don't need to go using dubious sources. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:39, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, for a sec it slipped my mind that once the game is out we will have everything :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And there are still screencaps from leaked version :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:37, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Which ones? [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:30, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The ones added by Gran28 - check page history. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:41, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, I thought where he said &amp;quot;Paris gameplay video&amp;quot; he was talking about a gameplay video released at some show in Paris. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:49, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The ones that I added was from a gameplay trailer released by DICE yesterday I think.--[[User:Gran28|Gran28]] 08:04, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Ah, if that's so, then my bad. Kinda hard to separate official ones from current leaks. Better mention that on the talk page :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:28, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Official MP Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emwEknzmyRo &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
can see a M4 with a Eotech and a Acog, and the front site is in when optics are attached.--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:32, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible return of the NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MgQMoPwGwM&amp;amp;feature=related and around 1:13-14, I thought I saw the pattern found on the straight mags that the 7.62mm NATO variant of the NDM-86 uses.&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT: Okay at 1:15 at the maximum quality, I could clearly see that magazine is straight.  This is no SVD guys, no SVD. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 18:09, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good spot, wouldn't have noticed that myself. I wonder why they opted for the NDM-86 instead of the SVD? I assume the SVD is harder to get in Sweden meaning the studio had to find an alternative. Is it still labeled as an SVD within the game? --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 19:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is, and it was in MoH. You know, I think MoH was like a super pre-Alpha version of this game, there's and MP7 too, and a few others. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:03, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I hope DICE do a better job on BF3 than they did on MoH, that game was shocking. There's probably some truth in that though :P --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 20:43, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well, MoH multi was made by a small team from DICE in 6-7 months, and ALL of DICE has been working on BF3 for, like, 5 years, I'm not worried ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:52, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Fair play to them but you'd have thought issues with the game would have been patched following the game's release. Still, I don't deny that BF3 will be a far better game however I'm sure some of the issues from MoH will poke through. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, we can hope the issues that poke through don't include those godawful skyboxes that MoH had. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:26, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE deliberately sabotaged MoH MP 'cause they were focused on BC2... :( But it is said that MoH 2 is being developed solely by DC. And it is rumored that MoH 2 will have Frostbite 2 Engine :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:50, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would be interesting to see what DC do with the Frostbite 2 engine, I wasn't all that impressed with the single player but taking into account that (as far as I'm aware) MoH was the studio's first game, it was an adequate effort. Was better than the multiplayer at least, in my opinion. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 07:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've always said that if MoH's MP was the same as it SP, then the MP would be awesome, I have it just for the SP :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:35, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just played some more of SP and I have to say I agree, pretty intense stuff. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 11:38, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just noticed that all of the US weapons are Armalites, and all of the Russian weapons are Kalashnikovs, it's cool. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:58, 21 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Aside from the 'SVD' which isn't a Kalashnikov design, but we'll forgive you as it is outwardly similar. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:16, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::True, but you got the point ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:21, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/sniper/sn18/svd_clones.jpg SVD Clones]. The third one is AK modified to SVD. Ain't Russian guns :P --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do like the fact that each faction has it's own starting weaponry, I always liked that about BF2 (though I didn't play it much) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 03:25, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:58, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can't find the video, but I'll post a link: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7447261.page [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:31, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 22:20, 22 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sniper Rifles can have iron sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yup. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 00:04, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmmm. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 00:56, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to tell because of the screwed up animation in the alpha, but you load a round into the chamber first, then the tube. EDIT: This is a good thing, I made sound like it wasn't :O [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
It fires semi, burst, AND auto, one of those fancy 360 degree fire selects or something :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:32, 23 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:problem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Alpha Gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the gameplay, I noticed that the front sights are still present when optics are attached, that M16A4 is now burst-fire and that the US LMG is called M249 in-game. Bipod gameplay was shown too. I also spotted the M-416 at 0:55, maybe the M4A1 equivalent of the enemy forces? [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:45, 24 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, yeah, they made it so the front sight is there, but disappears when aiming, the M16 has burst as well as auto (and semi), and the HK416 is an unlock, ONLY the default weapons are faction based, anyone can use unlocks, but the default ones might be usable by anyone later or something though. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's still much better than the MW games. Boy, you complain more about games than I do. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 02:19, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Defaults faction / unlocks not is how BFs 2 and 2142 worked, too. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:08, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not complaining, I actually like the front sight disappearing system, if it's not there the gun wouldn't work, but if it was, then having an RDS would give you a better field of view. The M16's fire modes aren't too bad, as long as the weapons have the right ammo count, reload properly, and have +1 I'm happy. Things like the player loading it fancy or whatever are okay. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M320 Standalone confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
This. Search &amp;quot;BF3 Grenade Launcher&amp;quot;, and the vid has a G3 with an ACOG too. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG 550 pretty much confirmed by Demize ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/30377608852017152 [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:56, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swiss weapon of choice 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Few Weapon Vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoU7uBNvP0&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LILgS-M2xo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's most everything in action, and with a few attachments. I love how the description for the M145 mentions the Canadian Army! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looking good so far, spotted some people on my Steam friends list playing the alpha. So jealous. :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:43, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm looking very forward to this game. :D - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 13:42, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Video Confirms new weapons for the game, as available in alpha build. In the first video we see an MP-7 PDW at 1:14, M1911 pistol at 1:57, RPK light machinegun on killfeed at 3:21, M27 IAR in killfeed at 6:12, M1014 shotgun at 7:34, G3 battlerifle on killfeed at 8:29, G36c assault rifle at 12:15, M320 grenade launcher on killfeed at 13:16. In the 2nd video we see RPK selection and model at 6:07 (usage following). Someone please update main page accordingly.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 15:32, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good of you to find everything, but leaked stuff isn't going on the main page :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:25, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: awww =(, thanks though.--[[User:DaiTaNam|DaiTaNam]] 17:39, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sigh, The M145 uses the M4 reticle over the M249/240 reticle :( --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:47, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's the reticle my (standard version) ELCAN replica has on my airsoft C7A2, do you mean the M145 version is supposed to have a different one? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 20:40, 25 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[http://www.dsarms.com/images/ELCM145M4W.gif Elcan M145 Optical Sight for M4 and M249/M240]. Remember people, this is just leaked Alpha and DICE will ''probably'' make changes to the game to make it right... Oh, and RPK :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 00:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh I see. And what do you mean, oh and the RPK? What's wrong with it? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:07, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Has the wrong bipod at the moment, doesn't look like the barrel is long enough to be an RPK either --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:31, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Well... since it has both synthetic furniture and curved magazine, it is [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg15/rpkm.jpg RPKM] (ignore the magazine color). However in-game description mentions that it uses 5.45x39 ammo, which is used in [http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg16/rpk74_02.jpg RPK-74M] that is actually used by Russian Forces. So the point is, DICE should change the magazine model and rename the weapon to '''RPK-74M''' for Russians. That Militia can use whatever they want. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I didn't know that, so the curvature of the magazine in an AK/RPK-style weapon can be used to identify the caliber? DICE have clearly given alpha invites to the wrong people, should have gone to the inhabitants of IMFDB. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: :D And yeah. The curve gradation for Kalashnikovs' magazines goes as follows: 5.56 &amp;lt; 5.45 &amp;lt; 7.62, with 7.62 curve being particularly distinguishable ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:28, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::You learn something new everyday, now I can complain that the BF3 RPK is incorrect &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:33, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I sent Demize a tweet (I made a Twitter accout JUST to send him stuff) that the RPK should be either the RPKM or RPK-74M (as I can't see the mags well enough), and also sent him another one saying the G3 should be the G3A3 :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::That is dedication to informing the developer their game is wrong, well played. I also sent him a tweet concerning the M145's reticle. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:30, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Very good :D Two problems I've noticed about '''SVD''': First, as already been noticed, is that in-game model of magazine is straight NATO one instead of curved Russian one; second, is that in-game '''PKS-07''' is using optical PSO-1 based reticle instead of its own magnified reflex reticle like this one: [http://www.newphillysports.com/milsurp/pks07reticle.jpg]. And here information about it: [http://www.gunscollecting.com/english/scopes/pks-07-collimating-sight/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:24, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Just recieved an invite to the alpha, I am so stoked to try this game out \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:44, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:56, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 1911 spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just watched a video and the 1911 is back. This game's version appears to be the MEU model. I can tell from the slide, sights, and hammer. It appears to be the old model with the Springfield Armory slide. [[User:ShootingLiberal|ShootingLiberal]] 23:53, 26 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't see the grips, but it appears to be a stock M1911 with a commander-style hammer (the round one, not the MEU one), a silver 3-hole trigger, and a silver barrel. Oh, after Googleing I found that that IS the original version of the MEU :/ http://www.justpistols.co.uk/meu_001.jpg That's an airsoft gun, but it's EXACTLY the one from BF3. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:35, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, the MEU Pistol is currently designated [http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/09/24/m45-close-quarters-combat-pistol/ M45] Pistol ;) So maybe in-game it is some kind of customized M1911 Pistol? :O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:36, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alpha ==&lt;br /&gt;
I just got the invite for the Operation Metro Alpha and Will post info here if I can.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 20:53, 27 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Awesome, that's two of us now :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So my impressions of the alpha so far are largely positive, not the biggest fan of the map however. Too many narrow corridors that you have to enter to advance, meaning that the defending team can plonk a SAW there and wipe you out as you enter the meat grinder. The weapons feel nice: Plenty of recoil meaning that burst firing is essential. Definitely an improvement gameplay-wise compared to BC2, which wasn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination. Looking forward to the beta now! \o/ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Improvement compared to BC2, is obviously. The question is, improvement compared to BF2! :O--[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:31, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can't really comment on whether it's better than BF2 as I haven't really spent much time on it (5 mins max) but it is a fairly solid FPS in it's own right. One thing that has bothered me thus far is 3D spotting, do not like it at all though, it should be changed for minimap spotting. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ah, in that case, if you still have BF2, I would recommend you download and install [http://www.realitymod.com/ Project Reality] mod, which focuses on realistic armed forces. There are people who have BF2 solely for it. And, it has British Army! :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/B_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:02, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yeah and the Canadian Army :D I'll be getting BF2/RM soon. Keep in mind this is one of the smallest map and it's meant to be more infantry focused, they'll be much bigger ones with more vehicles ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:10, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yup :D [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Uniform.png Their uniform] and [http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa356/DMasterST/C_Weapons.png their weapons] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 29 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I hope that with more vehicles comes more teammates actually willing to take them out. No one playing engineer was even trying, just using their launchers on each other. Meant to ask if anyone still played BF2 as I was gonna get it in anticipation for 3, should organise some gamz. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:57, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I'm trying to get BF2 again, loved that game, can't wait to convert it to PR. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:04, 28 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Needs a bit of polish but what I played of the alpha was a lot of fun, roll on October --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 18:32, 1 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sweet! [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:28, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Anyone have any questions about it? I'd be happy to answer them (as best I can) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:27, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== All Alpha weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/new-battlelog-screenshots-show-weapons-awards/battlelog-weapon-list/    - [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope, they will make new icons for AR-15 guns. These no-sights ones are just weird. Also, what I've said in &amp;quot;A Few Weapon Vids&amp;quot; --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:21, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The in-game ones have carry handles but I'm sure you knew this, I can live with a few slightly inaccurate icons on the Battlelog though. The M27 IAR had no front sight post for some reason in-game, made the Eotech pretty much essential. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:19, 2 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doesn't it have flip-up sights? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:43, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It does, yes, but the front sight is missing the front sight post. As in, the sights are there, but the post is not. Made aiming quite tricky as you can imagine. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:34, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, I'm assuming that's been fixed by now [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:15, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I hope so, was a nightmare. Still, barely used the RPK/IAR once the SAW was unlocked --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:44, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Cause the SAW's a real support weapon ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::^ This, though the fact that you can change the RPK and IAR to semi-auto was a nice feature --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:30, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Does IAR have better accuracy and SAW better firepower or SAW has ''both''? Because if it is the second one, IAR seems kinda... useless. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:35, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::For sure, the IAR/RPK are definitely more accurate than the SAW, the SAW is quite difficult to use at range without deploying the bipod whereas the other two don't have as much recoil. I assume the lighter support weapons are there for the more mobile, front-line support guy. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure this legit as another article is saying they're from OXM so should they be moved to the page and not discussion ? [[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== why aren't confirmed weapons named? ==&lt;br /&gt;
such as the g3 ,m416 ,m27 iar and many more????&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can't put leaked stuff on the page, you'd know this if you read the rest of the discussion --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:21, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::yeah thats why all the weapons used in the alpha were named in an official blog and yet there still not up here , so dont tell me i need to read the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do forgive me. Link to this blog? If it's legit you're free to edit the page if you wish. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:12, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I second the link request. Also, sign you posts. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:38, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(TOSSED)  RE-posting.  You guys should simply look up a bit next time. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:18, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that's not official blog. It's fanblog that also [http://bf3blog.com/battlefield-3-weapons/ makes assumptions] and [http://bf3blog.com/2011/07/battlefield-3-50-leaked-alpha-screenshots/ postes leaked stuff]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:55, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like I'm tossing that out the window. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:20, 4 August 2011 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::An image which was leaked from the alpha, users of which were under a non-disclosure agreement which means we could get in trouble if we post it up here. Until we get an absolutely official list of weapons (most likely from future trailers and the public beta) the page will stay the same. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:27, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Setups ==&lt;br /&gt;
So what kinda weapons and setups do you guys think you're gonna use?&lt;br /&gt;
*Medic - G3 (or other BR) with a scope&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineer - M1014 (or other shotty)&lt;br /&gt;
*Support - M249 (or other belt fed) with a bipod&lt;br /&gt;
*Recon - MP7 (or other SMG/PDW) with a suppressor&lt;br /&gt;
*Sidearm - M1911&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:21, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll probably play support mainly, it's what I spent 80% of the alpha doing and it's where I had the most fun. M240 with bipod, optic and flash suppressor will be my class of choice. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:29, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Obviously details will change as we get more info and after we actually play the game''&lt;br /&gt;
:^ This --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:40, 4 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PWNED #7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXaFw7aC9GE&lt;br /&gt;
A couple things I missed the first time I saw it, there's the M4, M1911, and G17, but also a Desert Eagle and MP5SD2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:17, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Desert Eagle? [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigNo NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What's up with the Desert Eagle? It's a perfectly good combat pistol *trollface*. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:11, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:22, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Developers really need to stop putting large caliber handguns and revolvers in supposedly 'realistic' games, it just feels stupid. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:38, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-oinyjsk0 I know what you're thinking. &amp;quot;Did he fire six shots or only five?&amp;quot; Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: &amp;quot;Do I feel lucky?&amp;quot; Well, do ya, punk?]'' --''Harold Francis &amp;quot;Dirty Harry&amp;quot; Callahan''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/revolver/1287756474.jpg .357 Magnum Colt Whitetailer], camper's wet dream :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:45, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Their rack of guns at 3:06 (presumably airsoft for modelling purposes) contains an M14 and a FAMAS, might be 2 more to expect in the full game. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:00, 6 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::M1911 + M14 = Old School Pack 8) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:48, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oops, I only thought to rewatch the range part, totally missed the FAMAS and M14 lol, good catch. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:15, 7 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pre-order Spectact kits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/2/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila][http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8472426507/1/tumblr_lpes8zstbf1r09ila]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some images of the exclusive Spectact kits you get via pre-order, you'll also notice that the Russian assault class soldier is holding an AEK-971&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Guess American Assault class gets XM8. Both weapons lost their respective trials. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:20, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise its just art , and probably wont be ingame --[[User:LukeWilliams010|LukeWilliams010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, will wait for confirmation regarding these weapons. Maybe it's just false alarm (and Desert Eagle too). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nah, the AEK will most likely be in, and the AK-74M will go to the PLR faction. There's nothing official, but there's the AEK (RU) and 74M(PLR), SKS as a sniper (PLR), T-72 tanks (PLR), and MP lines recorded in English, Russian and Farsi, that's confermation enough. I've seen no evidence of the XM8, but who knows, they did say there's 10 times the unlocks as BC2... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:30, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Russian Forces clearly used AK-74M on Operation Metro map. The same is expected from final release. As for PLR, there are only silhouettes, and as such it's unclear which AK is used. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The AEK will probably be a universal unlock for all factions if it is indeed in the final game (which I believe it will be, doubt they'd use a weapon in artwork and not include it in-game) --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:01, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There most likely will be no AEK in final game. Those renders showing specact skins are pretty dated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fair enough, I didn't know that. Not too fussed either way, not a big fan of the weapon. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 16:09, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please no XM8, at least not in the SP. If it's an MP only gun, I could care less whether it's in or not, though. I'm buying this for the SP, which I'm hoping will be at least semi-realistic. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:18, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I kinda doubt they will put in the XM8, I'd rather see a full-size G36. :) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 17:25, 15 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M16A3==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize99 tweeted that the M16A4 has been renamed to A3. Though we don't know if it still has all three modes, I'm thinking it doesn't. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 11:49, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm. Full Auto M16A4 seems more plausible to me than Picatinny Railed M16A3. Maybe call it M16A5? xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:57, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope, the A3 is actually an A4 with full auto, I thought it was an A2-style for a long time, but looks it up, its hard to find good descriptions, but the A3 and A4 are the same except burst/auto. No one on this site gets that because this site calls every A3-style an A4 with an A2 lower. Why? Because that's what armourers built them with, since they don't have A3s. In games the weapon is whatever it's meant to be because it's not &amp;quot;built&amp;quot; on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:09, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, now that's funny. Turns out to be true[http://www.armyproperty.com/Equipment-Info/M16A3-A4.htm][http://world.guns.ru/assault/usa/m16-m16a1-m16a2-m16a3-e.html]. Silly 'mericans couldn't get hold of manual burst firing, Military Command had to enforce it for them :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:21, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hey, those are the two sites I found! I just couldn't find them again :P Anyway, look at the description on the first site, it's worded very old, saying things like identical to A2, but also same as A4. That's actually the most info I've seen on an A3 in one place, adding to the confusion, since there isn't good info around. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:16, 11 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, Alex is wrong and so are the two websites Masterius linked to. The M16A3 is a full auto A2 (only used by SEALs and Seabees in very limited numbers), NOT a full auto A4. IMFDB policy is to identify a weapon visually, not by what the game calls it. In terms of A3 vs A4, the M16 in this game is intended to be an A4, so that's what it should be called. At least for the moment anyway. If it turns out the devs decide to axe the burst mode, we can classify it a C7A1, but until we know more, it should stay listed as an A4. I'm changing it back. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 01:11, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Uhm, Modern Firearms is respectable source. If you are claiming that it is not that means you have a better one? And the weapon can't be C7A1 since C7A1 is [http://world.guns.ru/assault/can/diemaco-c7a1-c7a2-c-e.html Model C7FT] (Railed Model 715 itself) and Full Auto M16A4 is [http://www.colt.com/mil/M16_2.asp Model 901] (Full Auto Railed Model 705 itself). And there are differences between 705 and 715[http://www.biggerhammer.net/ar15/variants/]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now I want to know whether Demize99 tweeted about RPK and SVD... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:25, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The first A3s had A2 uppers, but were later (and still are) issued with railed uppers, that's where people get confused. A3 = Rail. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:02, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I do have a better source. It's called Defense Industry Daily [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m-16-rifle-purchases-04517/]. Additionally, if you take a look at the M16A2 section of the [[M16 rifle series]] page, it says the exact same thing. I also never said MF ''wasn't'' a respectable source, but that doesn't alter the fact that it's wrong in this case. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:25, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Other MIL-STD-1913 rails can be found on the front grips '''et. al.''' of the '''A3s''' and A4s, where they mount useful items like flashlights, laser pointers, grip pods, et. al.''&lt;br /&gt;
:There too. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:59, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''P.S.''' Besides, why does it feature ''Wikipedia'' in '''Additional Readings'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Front grip&amp;quot; as in around the barrel, like a Knight's Armament M5 RAS. It has Wikipedia as an additional read because DID's article doesn't feature the M16 rifle's entire life story; Wikipedia does. In fact, why don't you take a look at Wikipedia where it states that the A3 is a full auto A2 and uses DID's article to verify it? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:07, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are a number of different rifles designated as the M16A3 by the US military. The first is what Wikipedia refers to, the Colt Model 646 which is also known as the M16A2E3, which was introduced in small numbers at the same time as the M16A2 and is an A2 with an A1 lower and was only used by the Navy and Coast Guard. Then you have the flat-top Colt Model 901 which was introduced at the same time as the M16A4 (in 1994 I think) which is basically an M16A4 with full auto rather than burst. The following is what the US army website says about the A3 and A4: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;The M-16A3 is identical to the M-16A2 but has a removable carrying handle that is mounted on a Picatinny Rail (for better mounting of optics) and is without burst control. The M-16A4 is identical to the M-16A2 except for the removable carrying handle and Picatinny Rail.&amp;quot; I would imagine that for modularity purposes the A3 in this game is the current version (Model 901).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:22, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, thanks, that really clears it up, so we could call the full auto A2 the M16A2E3, and the full auto A4 the M16A3, that makes sure they have different names, right? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:42, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Interesting, found [http://compass.seacadets.org/pdf/nrtc/cb1/14234_ch3.pdf information about M16A1 and M16A2E3] on [http://www.seacadets.org/ U.S. Naval Sea Cadet Corps website]. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:31, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::That PDF is actually wrong, as it states that the M16A2E3 is burst fire rather than full auto. Here is the [http://www.scribd.com/doc/29272650/MIL-R-71135-Rifle-5-56MM-M16A2E3-1992 US Army Military Specification] for the M16A2E3 from 1992 (go to page 4, and look at the fire selector section). Although calling the earlier rifle the M16A2E3 takes away the confusion, it can still correctly be called the M16A3 as it was reclassified as this, kind of like how the M16A2 was originally the M16A1E1. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 06:11, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::True, I guess someone just got lazy and didn't give the flat top version a new name, so the 646 and 901 are BOTH A3s. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:47, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Editors probably made a mistake in ''that'' part because everywhere ''else'' it says automatic fire (right from the beginning). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:19, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, and after more searching: [http://www.military-today.com/firearms/m16.htm] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:21, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I said, the very first A3s had A2 uppers, and after that they had rails. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 07:17, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Put it this way, the only times it says something about not having a top rail, it doesn't. What I mean is, it always says something really vague like &amp;quot;full auto version of the A2&amp;quot;, never mentioning specifics. I have not yet read somewhere that says that the A3 has a fixed carry handle, but have seen plenty that say the opposite. The problem was someone decided a long time ago that this site was for guns that are in movies only, not a gun wiki, so since the A3 is not in any civvie hands, and therefore not in any movies, it shouldn't be mentioned. All &amp;quot;A3&amp;quot;s in movies are A4s with A2 lowers, that is what the armourer used. However with the addition of newer weapons, and therefore newer entries, and the addition of games, where the guns don't really exist and therefore ARE anything, things are being added that never were before. Correct me if I'm wrong but the Mk.18 is only a military weapon, right? That means that, say, in the first Transformers movie Josh Duhamel's Mk.18 wouldn't have been a real Mk.18, but some Civvie M4 with a short barrel and such, made to look exactly the same as one. But that doesn't make it a Mk.18, however it IS listed as such. I may be wrong and it might actually be a Mk.18, but then Canadian C7-series is a better example: NO civvies have them. Period. But it still has an entry, as it is in Reality Mod, among a few others. Now we see the problem with not having an M16A3 entry: there might not be any in civvie hands, but there are some in games, like BF3, but COD4 singleplayer comes to mind as well, and I'm sure there are others. Hmm, I guess what this comes down to is we need an M16A3 listing on the M16 page. All of them should be listed, even if the only info is the name, a sentence about the weapon, and mention that it has never been in anything, otherwise we get stuff like everyone on the site getting false info about a particular weapon, and this happens. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That ''is'' specific. &amp;quot;Full auto version of the A2&amp;quot; means it's externally identical to the A2, but has fully automatic. I don't see how that's vague. If you've got a credible source saying A3s are &amp;quot;now issued&amp;quot; with flat top uppers, I'd like to see it. But if you look at the pattern of M16 rifle development, it's very likely that such a modification would bear a designation other than A3 (the only two exceptions to this in the platform's history were the Air Force's 11.5&amp;quot; barreled XM177s and when the Army dropped the Model 777 M4 for the Model 920 M4. Josh Duhamal used an M933 in Transformers, not a Mark 18. Mark 18-type carbines with 10.3&amp;quot; or 10.5&amp;quot; barrels can be had by anyone with proper licensing. But the reason we have Mark 18 mock-ups in movies listed as Mark 18s is because, like I already pointed out, it's IMFDB policy to identify the weapon on a visual basis. If it ''looks'' like a Mark 18, we ''call it'' a Mark 18 unless some other way of concretely identifying the weapon (such as an armorer ID) comes along. Your argument about civilian acquisition is a dead end since armorers like MPM are civilians, yet have fully automatic M4s, AK-47s, M60s, and so on in their possession. The only games I've played with full auto M16A4s are CoD4 and MoH, the pages for both of which identify the rifle as an M16''A4''. If you want an A3 category added, either take a look at the [[Talk:M16_rifle_series#Do_well_really_need_to_have_an_.22A2.22_and_.22A3.22_category.3F|M16 rifle talk page to see why it was deleted]] (where MPM himself states that the M16A3 has the same upper receiver as the A2) or come to the forum and state your case as to why said category should be reinstated. But as per IMFDB policy, the M16 on this page should be classified as an A4. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 00:14, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As soon as my problems with registration are solved, I'll bring this discussion to the light. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Bah. Is there any other way to contact forum administration other than through the forum? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:02, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Leave a message on [[User:MT2008|MT2008's]] talk page about it. He's an administrator on the forum. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 13:01, 22 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Both M16s ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirms multiple M16s! I'm expecting the A3 and A4 obviously [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:05, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, that's pretty cool. =) - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 20:32, 12 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's something I would like to take a look at in Beta :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He also confirmed not everything's in the Beta, but hopefully these two will be. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:22, 13 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see very little point in including 2 M16 models, just takes up space that could be filled with something new :\ --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 04:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The automatic one will probably be the starting weapon to balance it against another starting weapon, and burst fire one will probably be for everyone to use as an unlock. You see, so that to please everyone :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I gueessssss, suppose they don't have to remodel it or anything either, just change the weapon's code/animations. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 05:58, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think the A4 should be the starter and the A3 should be the unlock, makes much more sense to me. The starter ARs in COD4 were the M16A4 and AK-47 and that was just fine. Or maybe you can modify a base M16 into other variants. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:09, 14 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I guessed it right: Demize has confirmed that M16A3 will be the default US assault rifle for the Assault kit[http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/102776416898265088] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:00, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gamescom trailers and official gameplay vids ==&lt;br /&gt;
We've got official footage for 2 weapons, one already known (MP-443), and one all-new (SCAR-H CQC with Grippod and Aimpoint optic).  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE .  In the Co-Op live gameplay from the devs, one of them picks up an unknown pump action shotgun with a 4+1 capacity.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:06, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice! Wonder if SCAR-L in? Oh, and they give civilian shotguns to military again! *shakes head* Already noticed that with M1014 before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:44, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isnt 2 m16 models , where do you get your info lol there is one the m16a3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== INCOMING ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/images/news3/fact_sheet2.jpg *kaboom*]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EA just released the fact sheet with all the weapons/attachments/specs listed, there's the weapon page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EDIT:[http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=165281 and here's your proof] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:22, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that M39 the Finnish Mosin-Nagant? Or is there another battle rifle that uses the M39 designation?  Also, that list is missing the Groza bullpup AR that one dev caught one of the testers reloading.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 13:42, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M39 refers to the M14 variant used by the Marines [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M39_Enhanced_Marksman_Rifle (this)]. And the Groza bullpup was actually the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-91 A-91] (not the 9A-91 from BC2... Russian weapon designations are confusing)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 13:56, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good find, kinda wish I hadn't looked at it though XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:11, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: AHAHAHAHA, &amp;quot;SCAR H CQB&amp;quot; made my day. But at least they wrote ACOG, not ACOG Sight, nor ACOG Scope. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:30, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That is what FN Herstal calls it [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=184&amp;amp;backPID=182&amp;amp;productID=10&amp;amp;pid_product=232&amp;amp;pidList=182&amp;amp;categorySelector=1&amp;amp;detail] though does it really belong in the carbines section? I would have thought it still belonged with the battle rifles. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:38, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::They call it CQC, C for Combat not B for Battle. But calling it CQB is still more correct than calling it simply SCAR-H, like in Modern Warfail 2, because that usually refers to SCAR-H STD, the one w/ the normal length barrel. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 14:47, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I see, fair enough. As you said though, at least they were slightly closer than some games. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:51, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, this does nothing to allay my fears about it being a generic AMURIKA V EVUL ARABS AND KOMMIES shooter. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:37, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, looks like y'all missed them calling it the M93R, rather than just the 93R like it should be. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:39, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A few things; first, it looks like this list is a little dated, as Demize confirmed both M16s, but even though details might have changed, I bet this is a 100% list. Second, remember this doesn't include stuff like the M320 (as it's a Gadget in terms of game), and mounted weapons. Third, I'm assuming the M39 (M14) will be semi only, as only it and the SKS are in the Battle Rifle section, with the G3 moved to Assault Rifles. Similarly, I'm betting the Glock 18 and Beretta 93R will be auto and burst only, otherwise the Glock 17 and M9 would be pretty useless. Fourth, notice that there is a P90 AND a P90TR. I'm thinking if you attach an RDS to the P90TR, it becomes the standard one, like COD4's MP5SD. Lastly, what's a T44 pistol? I did a quick search and all I got was this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/T44.jpg Oh, also, I'm totally using the M82 with irons, just for kicks :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:49, 16 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm thinking the &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; might be the sidearm for Iranian forces, like the KH2002 will be their assault rifle. I don't know what it could be referring to, though; as far as I know, Iran uses P226 copies as their standard sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This looks ''really'' suspicious to me. No G36E (as was expected from BF2 (L85 too)), no SG 550 (as was confirmed by Demize), no multiple M16 (wasn't that said by Demize?), &amp;quot;Battle Rifles&amp;quot; actually being Marksman Rifle (M39) and Semi-Automatic Carbine (SKS), several weapons being ported from BC2 (AEK-971, A-91, PP-2000, Saiga-20K, MP-412) instead of BF2 (Bizon or Vityaz, Saiga-12K) for no reason; Beretta 93R and Glock 18 are actually law enforcement automatic pistols and will overshadow regular pistols... And T44? WW2 prototype gun being put in pistols?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; sheet was putted on [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/ official Battlefield Blog], I would have believed it. As of now I take it with a grain of salt. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:38, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The sheet lists an SG553 in the carbines section. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 05:14, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be like someone saying: &amp;quot;We want M4 in BC2!&amp;quot; and someone responded: &amp;quot;There is M16 there&amp;quot;. One weapon is assault rifle and other is carbine. They shouldn't cancel each other. Really. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, how exactly do you think the &amp;quot;straight pull bolt&amp;quot; under the weapon accessories could work? Either it will be some bullshit about somehow putting a straight pull bolt on bolt actions to increase ROF which will annoy the hell out of me, or I suppose it could be putting a straight pull bolt on assault/battle rifles to increase accuracy and turn them into sort of sniper rifles. Either way, I don't like it.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:32, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
T44 is what they are calling the [[Taurus Model 44]] revolver.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:35, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, so the revolver unlocks are Russian .357 Magnum and Brazilian .44 Magnum... American .357 Magnum like Colt and S&amp;amp;W would have been more reasonable, honestly... But yeah, some wouldn't want revolvers in military shooters at all. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:52, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sigh, more revolvers. I'm assuming that the straight pull bolt will be for snipers as opposed to assault/battle rifles, either for bolt actions to increase ROF (even though straight pulls are supposedly more tiring than turn bolts) or for the semi-auto snipers for a bit more accuracy? Teeny tiny list of machine guns, sadface. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:23, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weapon Reloads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody seen the GamesCom Coop-Demo? I just noticed how the guy reloads his empty shotgun. First round into the chamber, all the following into the tube. I think they got it right this time. [[User:Killerpixel|Killerpixel]] 10:08, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't see that one, but I saw the M1014 reload in the leaked alpha footage, and it does do that :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 10:19, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Tactical pistol reloads too :o --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:30, 17 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP7A1 Alpha Gameplay == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of Alpha gameplay videos on Youtube is insane, but in one of them I did see an MP7A1. Looked like the same model used in the Medal of Honor reboot. It was only seen for a moment, so hopefully someone can add more information? [[User:Miyazawa|Miyazawa]] 22:11, 18 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The MP7 is setup the same way as the MoH one, using the stock, grip, and pistol sights, but obviously has a proper empty reload. :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tried to add the MP7A1 on the BF3 weapon listing underneath the submachine guns but someone keeps on deleting it. I havent uploaded an image from youtube because honestly I dont know how, can someone help out with this and stop deleting this post as the weapon IS CONFIRMED. [[User:Valant]] 2:58PM, September 9, 2011 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
: No, it's not. You're not allowed to post anything from the Alpha build. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 17:18, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Valant here reposting MP7 gameplay, and to reply YES I CAN post because most weapons you see on page from the alpha/PAX gameshows. In fact for the most part all of the weapons should be deleted because they are from the same build. I have provided a link to show first hand footage. Once the game is released and this is fact checked, the comment I left before  can be deleted. Here is the link again:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvvdBhH0r4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just not getting into your head, isn't it?  Screencaps from non-official/leaked footage are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.  SO yeah, it's nice and all that you're linking that in the discussion, but please DO NOT edit the main page again until beta comes out. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:51, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh REALLY? Because last time I checked there are several screen caps and images that are of some low quality camera taking a picture of a screen DURING ALPHA! Check the muther f*****g G36C section, or The UMP45, the AK74M, the DIO KH2002, and G3A3. These are all weapons from the same build of the game and these have pages, ergo the MP7 should have its own section. Now, im off to put the post BACK UP so suck it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are confusing Closed Alpha with NDA and Game Shows (Expos) intended for public. Those ones are categorised as Pre-alpha‎ (expos before Alpha) and Pre-beta (expos after Alpha). And you are just asking to get reported. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:03, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.....reported.....really....well then if thats the case as I posted on another MP7 related discussion below Ill wait till the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; news about it comes out&lt;br /&gt;
== Full Auto Carbine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Been reading and watching videoa and they all have the M4A1 listed as a carbine. Does anyone know if the M4A1 fires full auto, three round bursts, or a single shot when fired?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The M4A1 is a carbine that is full auto or semi, just like real life, is that wierd? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:44, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbines ==&lt;br /&gt;
What makes me really happy is they got the term Carbine right; the M4A1 is an M16 Carbine, the AKS-74U is an AK-74 Carbine, the SCAR-H CQC is a SCAR Carbine, the G36C is a G36 Carbine, the SG553 is a SG550 Carbine, and, well, you could call the A-91 an AKM Carbine I guess. That's also why the relatively short HK416 is in the Assault Rifle section and not the Carbine one: it's not a Carbine. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:52, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Trivia Information''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:IRL in addition to Assault Rifle and Carbine category, there is also so called Sub-Carbine category (that is, shorter than Carbine). Four of the above mentioned pairs have three guns in these categories (and three of these four pairs even have additionally Automatic Rifle/Light Machine Gun variant but that's a different story). And here is the list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M4 Commando &amp;lt; M4 &amp;lt; M16&lt;br /&gt;
:AKS-74U &amp;lt; AK-105 &amp;lt; AK-74(M)&lt;br /&gt;
:G36C &amp;lt; G36K(E) &amp;lt; G36(E)&lt;br /&gt;
:SG 553 &amp;lt; SG 551 &amp;lt; SG 550&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And to which category HK416 belongs, [http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/hk416_specs.asp depends on the variant]. Quite a list, isn't it? ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And while AKM didn't have official carbine (there was [http://www.red-alliance.net/forum/index.php?topic=11481.0 a prototype] and that's it), SKS can be considered one somewhat :P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe that was interesting to read :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:45, 19 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Again... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's with the people using this &amp;quot;fact sheet&amp;quot; to clutter the main page with weapon titles. Can't they wait for more substantial material before adding stuff? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:02, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed; pages that are just lists of weapons without pictures or really any info look terrible, let's wait for them to show up. The people who care can find it here on the talk page, or Google :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:20, 20 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Leaked info is not allowed, and entries with no pics or info aren't very much liked either. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:29, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:^ Precisely. Official artwork, renders, graphical announcements (like that for Physical Warfare Pack, or Battlelog), screenshots, trailers, gameplay videos; screenshots made from official trailers and gameplay videos. All those things will do. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:50, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UMP==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can see it in a video from nvidia, the player to the right of the interview, you can see him using a UMP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
unkown what calibre, but im just gonna assume its UMP45 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:38, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==HK416==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
another video from nvidia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUyIIIKta44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if you pause at 0:30 it looks like the HK416--[[User:Sike|Sike]] 06:42, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:M27 IAR, to be specific. Based on the HK416, yes, but not a normal HK416. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 12:25, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well the Hk146 is in, it appeared on the battlelog stat page. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 09:25, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weird Weapon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is that weapon the guy starts using at 2:24, in this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiCNdEYCtgs ? It looks like an AS VAL, but that optic setup is weird. I wish they sticked to the real life russian optics, instead of creating rail-attaching versions. E.g.: The PK-AS (russian holographic) is actually offset to the left side of the gun, not aligned with the bore or mounted on a rail.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 08:20, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's quite hard to get hands on real Russian weapons in Sweden, so work is done with what's available... Oh, and PK-AS isn't holographic sight, it's reflex sight. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:56, 21 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be the VSS. You can use iron sights on a sniper rifle so they might allow you to use reflex and holographic sights as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's no VSS, there's a VAL, but this guy's an Engineer, so it doesn't matter either way. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 12:14, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fact Sheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People, while it has been confirmed that the fact sheet is indeed official, it's also been confirmed that it '''IS NOT A FINAL LIST''', it only shows the equipment available '''SO FAR'''. So don't worry, I'm sure many more equipment options will come (I hope these include an MP5). [[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 20:34, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, Demize wouldn't confirm whether the Karkand guns will be able to be used in standard BF3, but the way he said it seemed to hint they might, so I'm betting we'll see the MP5 and PP-19 Bizon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:26, 22 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gonzaga that's pretty much false hope , because there not going to release an official fact sheet and then add &amp;quot;many more guns&amp;quot; its not even wishful thinking its just stupid.and Alex when somethings is unconfirmed that doesn't mean its automatically going to be in the game, and if its anything like bfbc2 which it is, the guns will be seperate like the Vietnam expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: First, no need to call me stupid. And second, do you really think they can't add more stuff to the game 3 months away from the release? Not even the beta is out! Plus, by equipment I didn't necessarily mean more weapons. I guess you thought so because my example was a weapon.[[User:Gonzaga|Gonzaga]] 18:03, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did not call you stupid, I called your idea stupid.You really think that there going too add tonnes more &amp;quot;equipment&amp;quot; after they've released an official statement than that is stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's stupid here is you not signing your posts. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 12:06, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lol owned :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:47, 27 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS has a plastic stock ==&lt;br /&gt;
Demize confirmed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:36, 23 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 full weapons list ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is up on official [http://bf3blog.com/2011/08/complete-list-of-battlefield-3-weapons/ bf3 blog].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not the official blog. As it says in the description, it's a fan site. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:21, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, but it is news of an actual official announcement. --[[User:Nomad175|Nomad175]] 00:00, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The announcement was leaked, meaning that the information it contains has no place on the main page. Until we get official imagery of each weapon, they should not be added to the main page. Just makes everything look a bit messy and half-arsed if you ask me. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 06:49, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About SVD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So were there any news from Demize or some official material released that confirmed that the magazine for SVD was fixed or not? Should it have been changed to NDM-86 on the main page? Only seen it in leaked Alpha (which ''could'' have been a temporal state, considering that SVU in BC2 had proper magazine (SVD and SVU use the same one), and this one probably ported from MoH for testing purposes). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 12:35, 24 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battleblog #8 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sig 553 and Strela/Igla launcher confirmed in a post on the official Battlefield blog [http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/08/25/battleblog-8-build-your-weapon-of-choice.aspx] --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 10:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Heh, suppressive fire with carbine :) And the modelled launcher is [[SA-7 Grail|Strela-2]] (NATO reporting name: SA-7 Grail) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thought as much, was the disk-shape thingy at the front that gave it away. &amp;lt;3 the weapon customisation that BF3 will offer though, gonna be awesome. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 14:46, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the primary indicator for Strela-2 is that, errr, under-barrel thingy with tube-and-spike shape while every other model is ball-and-tube. Here is a nice chart: [http://blueprintbox.com/watermark-gif.php?img=./data/media/384/sa-14-strela-gremlin.gif]&lt;br /&gt;
:::And yeah, customisation is great \o/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:22, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the bit I meant, forgive my extremely technical description XD --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 17:06, 25 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, heh, right. Thought you meant the launcher tube itself :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:47, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incoming weapon modification options seem very exciting....lots of options to tailor your weapon to your specifics. However, the only detail about the blog that keeps me sceptical is the fact that you need to unlock every feature for each weapon individually. Knowing that from MW2 that would mean hours and hours and hours of playing with just one weapon to finally unlock the parts needed to tailor it to your specifics, only to then unlock the next weapon you've been longing for and then you need to start again from scratch with that weapon. Rather frustrating IMO. Would a better idea to make the modification parts a global unlock, so that once you unlock say supressors with an assault rifle, it counts for ALL other assault rifles too...same with LMG's, Pistols, Shotgungs, etc. [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:05, 26 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
Found it; 2nd video, 21 seconds in. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:13, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link please? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 09:25, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OOPS, sorry, here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://ob-game.blogspot.com/2011/08/battlefield-3-three-videos-from-pax.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 13:57, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ummm you're wrong thats an mp412 , the scope also looks russian which gives it away&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually it doesn't look like the Mp412 at all or the T44, it looks a little different, take a look at this image I snapped of it&lt;br /&gt;
: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/687/mp412orcoltpython.jpg/&lt;br /&gt;
: To me it almost looks like a Colt Python from Black Op's, notice the iron sights, front and rear (the white markings) and the silhouette of the barrel and cylinder as well as the positioning of the grip, it's hard to say but my vote is towards a Colt Python. DICE did say they were going to add Faction specific weapons and if you look a little earlier the guy was using a Stinger. I'd think a Colt Python .357 Magnum would go nicely as a US analogue to the Russian MP412 .357 Magnum. Also to the Scope, it could just be a Russian style scope attached to a US weapon, they did say that the customization was huge so it's a possibility [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:47, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its an mp412 , if it was a python it would have grooves down the barrel housing which it doesn't its solid like the mp412 also I noticed the break action latch near the iron sight, which also corresponds to the mp412 , the python does not have a break open design. *Edit* also the colt python is not in the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The devs didn't say there isn't any other revolver in the game, thus shouldn't you, Persistent Mr. Anonymous. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:17, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, it's NOT a 412, but it could be a Python, some S&amp;amp;W, the Raging Bull, I don't know. The lighting's wierd, but it looks stainless to me, which would be good if the MP412 is black. The SKS, which is synth, has been spotted with an EOTech, so unlocking American optics for Russian guns and vice versa is confirmed. I'm thinking every optic, with the exception of the 6x and 12x sniper scopes, can be used on anything. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:33, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, if you cant indentify that gun, then you shouldn't really be on the site to be honest, because you can clearly tell that's a mp412 the colt python has barrel housing grooves this doesnt it solid like an mp412 , you can also see the break action latch is,colt pythons dont have this because they are not break reloaders. *Edit* and how can you say that it is stainless? its clearly black with a synthetic grip.&lt;br /&gt;
:In that case, by your rationale you should leave right now. Ignoring everything else about the gun, look at the muzzle end. This pistol has a rounded barrel with a raised rib. The Mp412 does not. Also, the locking indents on the cylinder are wrong for a MP412, where they are small cuts coming from the rear of the cylinder, rather than the more traditional ones shown here. The part of the frame that meets the rear of the cylinder is also wrong for a MP412, which would have a &amp;quot;step&amp;quot; rather than a smooth ramp where it widens to the width of the cylinder. Due to the motion blur ghosting on this image it is really hard to tell anything about it so we will just have to wait and see. Also, sign your posts and stop being so condescending.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:22, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, just noticed that in the same clip the person in front of you has a G36C, so that can go ahead and be confirmed, along with the Stinger for that matter.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 03:47, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021255.jpg|thumb|500px|none|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, these are official videos, not DICE ones, but offical meaning by a site/company etc; should they be added to the main page? It's kind of a grey area. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:25, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::PAX and NVIDIA are definitely can be considered official source just as E3 and IGN. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:40, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok lets just leave it as the t44/mp412 for now, if we cant agree on what gun it is, then theres no point arguing senselessly we'll have to wait until the game comes out to properly identify it --[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 14:10, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M4 and M4A1==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was just browsing through twitter when i noticed something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://twitter.com/#!/Demize99/status/108437158804717568&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
both the M4 and M4A1 is in. like how the the M16A3 and A4 are in. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 10:54, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that's amuses me because I had ''exact'' the same thoughts. Seems I wasn't alone xD --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:10, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems to me more that BF3 will have much more weapons than we thought. Well, let's just pick one up and kick some asses with it :) --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 11:12, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think its pretty cool they are getting multiple variants for each gun. Heres hoping for an AK-47 unlock.--[[User:N-10 Aden|N-10 Aden]] 12:06, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the same twitter he makes a point of saying that the M4A1 was designed for special forces whereas the standard weapon that would be found being used by Marines is the M4. My spidey sense is telling me that the standard weapons will be the burst M4 and M16A4, and they will be upgradable to full auto M4A1 and M16A3 (flat-top receiver won't tally and the number will make no sense to the layman but whatever).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 16:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, he already said the full auto ones are default. But I'd figure in SP we're more likely to see the burst ones. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:31, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::SP: M4 for regular Marines, M4A1 for USSOCOM units, something like that. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:50, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In any case, it's awesome they added variants of many weapons. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 17:46, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:28, 31 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't remember where I saw it from, probably from Battlefield wiki but I remember seeing that the weapon variants were based on each Classes Kit selection. So for example, take the Assault class, as it's being merged with the Medic Class, Players would have the option to equip either a Grenade Launcher of carry around a Medkit. So for example, an M16A3 could be default setting with a Medkit as a piece of equipment but the M16A4 is used when attaching a grenade launcher. But that's just my theory [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 12:37, 1 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not really merging, they're just going back to how they had it in BF2142 (Assault = Medic + Assault, Recon = Sniper + Special Forces, Engineer = Anti-tank + Engineer and Support = um, Support, his main &amp;quot;thing&amp;quot; being his extra droppable things like a portable shield and a sentry gun). In 2142 every Assault had a Medkit since you don't want to give your medics the option of being even more useless, the optional item for the Assault class was the defib. The fastest way to get TK'd as Assault was to have someone realise you weren't carrying one. I imagine this one will be the same, Support will always have an ammo box and assault will always have a health box. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PWP Trailer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-ukxgldpOo&amp;amp;feature=feedu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
warning, containts footage from operation metro they some players may find offensive. --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 08:58, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is... ''SKS''? Reminds me of AK-47 in MW2 *sadface*&lt;br /&gt;
:Another thing noted: incorrect reticles for M145 and PKS-07 are still in... --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:27, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember though DICE did say that you can &amp;quot;customize&amp;quot; your weapon, that might be a SKS just heavily modified by the player rather than appearing as the &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; weapon. Who know's if we're lucky, the SKS might be featured as standard in it's default config [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As much as I would want it to be, I doubt that what DICE meant by customization. BF3 so far doesn't seem to have customization as elaborate as, for example, [[Ghost Recon: Future Soldier]]. Thus this tacticool SKS is probably the only one *sadface* --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:44, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; -.-... OMG! What the heck is their deal with the DAO-12? Can't they just call it how it supposed to be called?! --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 10:01, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DICE seems to have obsession with this &amp;quot;designation&amp;quot; as it tracks way back from Battlefield 2 (2005) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 10:16, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DAO-12 was used because of a legal conflict with Armsel using the Striker name, it became a fan favorite so they kept the name. --[[User:Ghostdigga|Ghostdigga]] 14:09, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
i asked Demize on twitter and he replied saying it was a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 14:12, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly, and we all know how bad most gamers are at identifying weapons, the MW3 crowd widely believed the ACR was a SCAR because the ACR was tan (in MW2 the SCAR was tan and the ACR was this ugly grey colour, and now the ACR is tan). If they renamed it Striker a lot of BF players would think it was a different gun :/ [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:20, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Er, that doesn't really sound like a bad thing :/ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 15:29, 2 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i asked demize about it, and he said they named it the DAO-12 as a homage to BF2 --[[User:Sike|Sike]] 07:57, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
I asked demize if there was an m14 battle rifle and he replied ,and said there is a M39 EMR so that can now be added to the weapons list.--[[User:Lukewilliams010|Lukewilliams010]] 16:07, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He also said SG 550 would be in, official blog showed SG 553. And SKS is &amp;quot;SKS&amp;quot;. We need official ''illustrated'' material. As soon as it is available - go ahead, put it in. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 16:29, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, if we don't have a picture, don't add it, even if it's not leaked. It's not like we won't have everything up pretty soon. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:53, 3 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M4A1/M16 Gas block question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen quite a few topics concerning the lack of a visible gas block on the M4's and M16's in a number of shooters, and I was wondering if it was possible that the gas blocks could be either low-profile gas blocks that were either not visible or were actually under the RAS, or if the gas blocks were actually integrated into an after-market RAS. It seems odd to me that developers would repeatedly make the same mistake over different games in different franchises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's possible to just remove the front sight without removing the gas block on a standard M16 rifle and M4 but it'd be a little exposed. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 17:23, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you mean with a hacksaw? Aren't the gas block and front sight a single piece of metal? It is however possible to get a low profile gas block (relatively easy replacement) that only extends above the barrel to the height of the gas tube plus a few mm, so that certain free floating RIS systems can be mounted over the top of it. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 18:39, 10 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That was my question; with all the Military consultants they have coming in and looking at this stuff, I'd always assumed that they had just modeled an after market RIS and low-profile gas-block.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder why developers won't just model Flat Top Mounts\Risers on the sights for M4s\M16s ? That's how the problem is solved IRL, including in U.S. Military. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:16, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd imagine that most modellers don't realise that the front sight is also the gas block, so they see no problem in removing it for aesthetic/gameplay purposes. 99% of gamers probably don't realise either.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 09:15, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both the modellers and the gamers doesn't supposed to care about this kind of things, only people like us, it can concern. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 09:31, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was well after I got into learning about firearms and such that I found out the front sight (gas block) and stock tube (buffer tube) are required for the AR series to function, so you can't remove either pretty much. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:53, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's true that the stock front sight post is also the same piece of metal as the gas block, but you can remove them so long as you put a new gas block on.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Hominis Solus|Hominis Solus]] 21:58, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I meant you can't just take it off :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Confirmed to be the more modern 5.56mm version by Demize. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:08, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Guillotine Teaser Trailer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else seen it? There's a mortar that the player-character uses to send up flares (I think they called them illumination rounds) and I think the player-character also uses a Mk. 17 with some sort of 4x scope. Sorry, I'm still fairly new to this. [[User:GunEnthusiast|GunEnthusiast]] 05:27, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the mortar is an M224, and yes it was a Mk.17 with an ACOG (magazine looked a bit small in the mag-well, but could be the angle as could only be seen when climbing the wall). Also, it looks like the guy who is stabbed at the end of the video is carrying a G3A3 with an ACOG.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 07:35, 12 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M16 series reload animation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm fairly new to this site, though I've been following it closely to see the development of the firearms that will appear in Battlefield 3.&lt;br /&gt;
I've been reading that a lot of you guys are expecting an accurate portrait of the M16 series reload animation in the game. I just wanted to ask how do you properly reload an M16 in real life? It is my understanding that when the rifle is empty, you load it by pulling the charging handle. But when there is a bullet still in the chamber you just need to press the bolt catch. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I just want to get this clarified since I've never been able to understand the reload mechanic of the M16.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:14, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:With the exception of loading the gun for the first time or clearing a jam, you never need to touch the charging handle. If you are reloading from a partial magazine, there will be a round in the chamber so all you need to do is drop out the magazine and push a new one in. When you you empty the magazine in an M16 type weapon the bolt locks back automatically, so you drop out the magazine, put a new one in, and then all you need to do is push the bolt release on the left side to let the bolt go forwards (you can also push the forward assist if you feel like it).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 04:20, 16 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, the third reason you might is if you just picked it up off the ground, to check it's still mechanically sound. Though that sorta falls under clearing a jam. Edit: Also you might part-pull it on drawing it if you're into brass checks, though given how often FPS characters change weapons habitually brass-checking on draw would probably indicate a very short memory. &amp;quot;Yep, still there from ten seconds ago, how bout that.&amp;quot; [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:09, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could rack the charging handle if you like, but the proper way to reload and empty M16 type weapon is to just slap the bolt release. I call it the ping pong paddle. A lot of games forgets about little things like reloads for weapons [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 01:02, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Who removed the MP7!?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, who took away the MP7 from the submachine gun catergory? I spent a whole 20 minutes adding that section of the article and some guy just deleted it. Why? It was really in the game and not in any way spammy or vestigial.  Whoever took away put it back. Come on, I don't want to remake the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THere are NO official images of it.  And no official video footage has featured it.  Don't post images from the Alpha --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 03:20, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the fact remains that it has been seen in the game, and it was already on the page before I made the changes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why can't I use the Alpha? I don't know if there is or is not a rule regarding alpha version footage and stuff. I thought the purpose of this site was to chronicle what weapons were used in what movies/games/TV/Anime.  If I have evidence that the MP7 is in BF3, why does it matter whether or not it was from the Alpha or official footage?  The image I used was from a gameplay video I saw on Youtube.  Does this mean no one can use their own gameplay videos?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, it means that you have to wait for officially released material or for the game to actually come out. This applies to leaked gameplay footage, images from leaked betas, dubious leaked information in general (eg the MW3 leaks from Kotaku) unapproved on-set photos, leaked movie footage like that infamous cut of ''X-Men Origins: Wolverine'', and so on. Building an article is not a race, if we have to wait to confirm something is official, that's what we do. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:49, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose that makes sense, I'm gonna keep that in mind when making contributions in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought anything to do with the Alpha was under an NDA anyway? [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 04:31, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, if you look at the screencap he posted the guy who leaked it deliberately blacked out his own name. Obviously knew he shouldn't have been recording it and posting it in the first place. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 04:47, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, for the last frickin' time.  Please DO NOT add weapons that are not in any official gameplay vids/trailers/screenshots, until they are.--[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 14:02, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@ HashiriyaR32: Hey! I was also someone who tried adding the section of the MP7. Its in the alpha videos but to be fair, so is every freaking gun that is on this page! The only videos that are available are the ones from the alpha. Seriously take the amount of time it takes to delete the post and go onto youtube and see for yourself! In fact, after posting this I will repost the MP7 with a link to the youtube video...Also FYI I happen to love this website and for all it stands for and I try to monitor several different games to make sure the info is correct, I would never want to add something that didnt exist in a videogame/movie. Valant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What? Nothing on the page is from the alpha, everything's from screenshots, trailers, concept art, or official videos, like EA Pwned, IGN, etc. If you don't believe me, give me an example. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:52, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Valant, its as simple as this. To take part in the Alpha you had to sign a non disclosure agreement. That means that any footage that you have seen was illegally distributed. Until guns show up in an official (and legal) source, they shouldn't be listed here. The MP7 may very well be a weapon in the game, but the point is that at this point that information has not been publicly release, to say nothing of the fact that legal screenshots cannot be posted on here. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:11, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right, and as soon as the Beta is out, we can add everything, it's only a week-ish, and besides, WE all know the MP7 &amp;amp; others are in, and they can be mentioned on the talk page, just the official page can't have it. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 19:39, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I should just delete this whole page then shouldnt I? Because again every weapon we are seeing IS NOT CONFIRMED! There is no beta released and only Alpha videos....Seriously this is bullshit&lt;br /&gt;
:The difference is that all the other weapons are from material that was released by EA, or from footage that they allowed to be shot (The images from the G36C section are from an interview with one of the developers IIRC) as opposed to the video you posted which was illegal made and distributed by someone breaking the NDA they signed. As you seem unable to grasp this, just wind your neck in for a week or so until the Beta is released, and then it can be posted with LEGALLY obtained confirmation images. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 13:15, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If posting info from a breach of NDA is the main reason than I can understand that. Then I shall wait for the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; information to be released.&lt;br /&gt;
== G3A3 and UMP.45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The weapons can be seen in these videos from GameSpot in the Tokyo Game Show 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
Though it's cam footage you can clearly see the pick-up icon of the weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should work their magic and add those to the page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd0M7_3wENw Part 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbsI9Vsv5wE Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arOhTIaeGGY Part 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Santos|Santos]] 12:59, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can have it down in about 20 minutes. --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would imagine that if it is cam footage it has likely not been officially release and is against copyright, so probably shouldn't have caps on here. You can get a shot of the G3A3 from the end of the guillotine trailer though.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:05, 17 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the two weapons on the page. Since the videos were not leaked but released by a reputable game journalism/review site (Gamespot.com) it should be okay, right?  If they weren't allowed to release it Gamespot wouldn't have done so. I looked around and other gaming websites are posting the footage as well [http://www.gametrailers.com/video/tgs-11-battlefield-3/721062]. I'm pretty new to IMFDB, so is the stuff I saw in the gameplay okay to post? --[[User:Samael527|Samael527]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Similary to E3 with IGN, PAX with NVIDIA, TGS with GameSpot definitely can be considered official source. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:53, 18 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M1911 Confirmed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://gunclub.ea.com/us/intel/blog/battlefield3-weapon-unlock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For being an EA gunclub member you get an M1911 :P --Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Gun-Club/images/bf3-gun-unlock.jpg --[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:39, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not too sure exactly what pistol they have based this on though. It has slanted cocking serrations on the slide (rear only), non target sights, beavertail grip safety and a rounded burr hammer. Closest thing I can think of is the early version of the [[1911#M-45_MEUSOC|M-45 MEUSOC]], which are a old USGI 1911 frame with a [[1911#Springfield_Armory_M1911_-_A1|Sprinfield Armoury]] slide, a rounded hammer, a beavertail grip safety and Pachmayr rubber grips (along with some other less obvious improvements).  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, I'm pretty sure it IS the original version of the MEU. Also, you missed the Springfield 3-hole trigger. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 22:24, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gun Club? Looks like EA is messing up again: http://gunclub.ea.com/us/mygunclub/rewards&lt;br /&gt;
:They haven't even fixed the stat tracking :S --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:12, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Battlefield 3 Open Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, EA confirmed the PC/X360/PS3 BETA startup. Begining 27.09 for those who have MoH 2010 Tier One Edition, and 29.09 for the rest.&lt;br /&gt;
Good opportunity to test the game and get some guns updated :). ~ GumBoy 21.09.2011 16.07 (CET)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, the early access is open for people with the Medal of Honor Limited Edition as well, not just Tier One. It's also for people who pre-ordered before a certain cutoff, but I can't remember the specifics. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 09:10, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can't wait for this, hope we get a different map this time, Operation Metro was good but not great. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 09:37, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Caspian Border would be great :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 11:06, 21 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP2000 Spotted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Battlelog pics here: http://www.battlefieldlog.com/2011/09/battlefield-3-beta-battlelog.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic here: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pdUIBRNHpXo/Tn4uZQaayQI/AAAAAAAAAdw/PVmts2hVNjU/s1600/battlelog-4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's the pistol, what's the shotgun? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:09, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the handgun is a Glock variant, whilst the shotgun is Benelli M3 Super 90. --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 08:02, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I saw the PP2000 in action at Eurogamer Expo, looked pretty good. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 08:16, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hmm, I never saw it before. The shotgun is the 870 MCS and the pistol is the Glock 17. If you look at the page, he's level 0 with no XP, so these are the first unlocks, which makes sense given what they are: a shotgun, a pistol that isn't faction-based that's similar to the M9 and MP443, and a PDW. Also, now that the PP2000 has a stock we won't have any more stockless guns, specifically stockless guns with scopes... [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:08, 25 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, the magazine tube is rather short for M870 MCS. Which would mean it is rather regular variant of M870 with pistol grip and full stock. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:49, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, the MCS is modular, hence the name, it just has the 4 round tube as standard, with the 7 round one as an attachment. This is the MCS: http://www.kiesler.com/shop/ProductImages/Model870MCS_PartSLG.jpg [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:57, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The magazine tube in MCS is supposed to have the same length as the barrel as can be seen here: [http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/Firearms/Shotguns%20Pump/MCS.aspx Remington Model 870 Modular Combat Shotgun (MCS)]. Thus the 3+1 MCS would have the same 10&amp;quot; barrel. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:23, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I understand it's supposed to, but it's still an MCS, just not assembled properly or something. If you don't like it, just use the extended tube attachment, I know I will be, and Demize confirmed (how many times have I written those two words now?) all the extended mag attachments are visible, like the MP7s 40 round magazine, or this shotgun. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:50, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::If that's so... Okey, an oddly assembled MCS ¯\(°_o)/¯&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::P.S. I didn't count how many times you have written those two words D: --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 07:02, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::LOL! :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 08:08, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Demize confirmed that Alex says 'Demize confirmed' a lot. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:00, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::[http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg/hr/im-metal-hs-2000-e.html XD] --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACR?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOHjF4_apI&amp;amp;feature=channel_video_title&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magpul Masada/ ACR?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 0:36, the handguard and flashhider look very similar to that of the ACR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it might be the SG 553, also has a similar flashhider. --[[User:Chrausis|Chrausis]] 12:07, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree, it is the SG 553. Can tell by the design of the rail system, shape of the receiver and the fact that it has a smooth curve to the top of the stock rather than an adjustable cheek riser.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 12:14, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also see the M320 Launcher at 0:41, so thats one more launcher for the page [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:09, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ugh, what a song choice :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 14:12, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whine, whine, whine. No game is good enough for you people. :P - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:41, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not game - song &amp;gt;:O --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:49, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yay, finally can see the M320 mounted instead of standalone :D And yeah, I agree that's the 553. Oh, and what do you mean &amp;quot;you people&amp;quot;? Lol ;) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:05, 26 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I thought you were complaining about the game. I was just joking when I said that. *rolls eyes* - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 18:44, 27 September 2011 (CDT)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NDA for Beta ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, from what I'm hearing the Beta is going to be subject to an NDA, just like the Alpha. This may just be for the early access and may be rescinded once it goes public, or it may be for the whole thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What this means is that we can't post info or shots from the Beta build until it is rescinded. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:02, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://twitter.com/#!/zh1nt0/status/115781634879524864 Disregard.] I screwed up, again. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 02:15, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Haha :) That's good news [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:18, 27 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G17C modelled after G17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just talked to a DICE dev on Steam, and he told me the reason they modelled the G17C after a regular G17 it's to save prestanda so the game can run as smoothly as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
So that's why is missing those compesators &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; on the slide. And the reason they decided to still call it a G17C, is because is only a minor detail. They probably have more relevant things to fix, than changing the correct name of a weapon. edit: forgot to sign [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's understandable, given the crazy graphics and everthing else this game it running. If they don't change it we'll note it as incorrect on the main page, but note that it was intentionally left out; if they do know the correct difference between the C and standard, but needed to do for technical reasons, I'm happy. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 14:33, 30 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But someone could state in the main page, that it was left there intentionally due to some other and more important things to worry about in the development of the game. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 03:46, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess that proves that Frostbite 2 Engine is much more complicated and difficult to mod than Refractor 2 Engine. To fix weapon's name in Battlefield 2 one needed a mere Notepad ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:57, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That might well not change, since the config files will have weapon names in plain text that can be replaced (unless the names are actually images or something). [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:49, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's stupid what the guy from DICE said: &amp;quot;''We modeled the gun after the regular G17 so the game would run faster...''&amp;quot; Huh? So if the gun is actually a 100% G17, why call G17C? Am I missing something here? --[[User:RaNgeR|RaNgeR]] 04:10, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Modelling the holes ''would'' require they put an inside surface on the barrel, but I can't see how an engine that features buildings falling into hundreds of pieces of high-detail rubble would be screwed over by that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 17:47, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corrected some information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went through and fixed some things. There is a Korean M16 that has 4 firing modes and the shotgun in Op Gullotine is a Remington 870 which you can tell by looking at the rear sight. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:23, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It has four? Cool, didn't know that. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:41, 1 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lack of weapon variety ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theres so many AK and M4 style weapons but no real variety, wheres the steyr, uzi and such.&lt;br /&gt;
The snipers are pretty much useless after the first two so why change ?&lt;br /&gt;
Like 3 AK styled assault rifles ?&lt;br /&gt;
Am i missing the point because it seems Mw3 has a much better weapon variety.&lt;br /&gt;
When i unlocked the SkS it takes 4 bullets to kill. That's double what the other two took even though they're the same calibre. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are lazy. Quite a bunch of unlocks are derivatives of starting weapons. There are so many European weapons that could be put as unlocks, but nooooo! Maybe DICE are saving for DLCs? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 08:28, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah when they said 10 times the unlocks, who knew they meant dogtags and pistols with new attachments. And we have to unlock the same attachments for every other gun over and over. Whats with the lack of guns ? :/ And Some weapons like the m16 take 6 bullets to kill... the ump takes 7 from my experience. So why even bother using these weapons when i can have a sniper that 2 hit kills with a RDS. The beta has dissapointed me. --[[User:Joey1666|Joey1666]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Maybe the game will have a &amp;quot;Hardcore&amp;quot; mode like the Modern Warfere games. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:51, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Always fun when people complain about balance before the balance has had any meaningful time to settle. Tomorrow people will be complaining half these things are totally overpowered when they figure out how to use them properly. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 09:34, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Im not complaining about balance, if AR's take 6 hits to kill, i dont mind ill stick to my battle rifle. Just wish there was more variety is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, from trying the PS3 beta it seemed all my weapons took ~6 hits to kill while all their weapons killed me instantly. Nothing like repeatedly being murdered by a spawncamper with, of all the goddamn things in the world, a UMP. &amp;gt;:( [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All of the 5.56mm (and 9mm) weapons do 25 damage at point blank, making them 4 hit kill, and start dropping after about 20 feet, so 5 at midrange seems better, but could be 6, I can't see how far you're shooting. Also, all the 7.62mm (and .45) guns do 33.4 damage at point blank. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:36, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, I hope they fix the damage, from what I'm reading it's pretty stupid right now. :\ - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 15:35, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Personnally I like the fact that there are many AK &amp;amp; AR15 style firearms in it, and for that you have to unlock the attachements for each gun, I don't see a problem there, you just have to use the guns if you really want them. --[[User:VillageFroid|VillageFroid]] 12:11 October 2 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yeah i dont mind unlocking the same attachments over and over its just that they said there's 10 times the unlocks and not the same unlock 10 times however the amount of attachments is a nice touch. I just wish there was more weapons is all. - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There, I removed all Kalashnikov and Stoner weapons and thats what is left, why are you guys complaining? The weapon selection is good. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 12:04, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G3A3 &lt;br /&gt;
AN-94 &lt;br /&gt;
KH2002 &lt;br /&gt;
AEK-971 &lt;br /&gt;
F2000 &lt;br /&gt;
AS VAL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines (Engineer) &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
G36C &lt;br /&gt;
SCAR-H CQC &lt;br /&gt;
A-91 &lt;br /&gt;
SG553  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Machine Guns (Support) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M249E2 &lt;br /&gt;
M60 &lt;br /&gt;
M240 &lt;br /&gt;
6P41 &lt;br /&gt;
QYJ 88 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SVD (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
M40A5 &lt;br /&gt;
SV98 &lt;br /&gt;
M98B &lt;br /&gt;
M82A3 (not in MP) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Battle Rifles (Recon) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M39 EMR &lt;br /&gt;
SKS &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub-Machine Guns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P90TR &lt;br /&gt;
MP7A1 &lt;br /&gt;
UMP45 &lt;br /&gt;
PDR &lt;br /&gt;
PP2000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotguns (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
870 MCS &lt;br /&gt;
M1014 &lt;br /&gt;
USAS-12  &lt;br /&gt;
Striker &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pistols (All Kit) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
M9 (US) &lt;br /&gt;
MP443 (RU) &lt;br /&gt;
G17 &lt;br /&gt;
M-45 &lt;br /&gt;
MP412 &lt;br /&gt;
T44 &lt;br /&gt;
93R &lt;br /&gt;
G18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the main game comes out, we'll all see the diversity, alot of the weapons in the Beta are mostly there for testing purposes, I haven't even seen anyone unlock ALL the weapons yet in the Beta so I'm not sure how many exist there. Plus we might also see more weapon diversity in the Singleplayer [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:12, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:To add on to my reply, I should also mention that while yes I feel a little disappointed that they didn't add some other &amp;quot;common&amp;quot; weapons like a traditional MP5 or some other weapons like certain Pump Action Shotguns, it doesn't really phase me too much, because from what I've seen thus far they've pretty much nailed some of the roles appriopriately. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 13:23, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok so ive done a bit of research, veteran gives you one extra weapon, Co-op gives you 6 extra weapons and the first expansion gives you 10 weapons.... thats 17 more weapons. I feel more comfortable now :) Not only that but theres plans for more expansions :) http://mp1st.com/2011/10/02/leaked-weapon-list-for-battlefield-3-back-to-karkand-dlc/ - Joey1666&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In realistic terms 9mm subguns and indeed subguns in general have fallen out of favour since the 80s / 90s and largely replaced by 5.56mm carbine rifles in their traditional roles as bad guys started wearing body armour. From what I've heard, neither the UMP or the MP7 did anything like as well as their older brother. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite right. The co-op and veteran weapons are among the list we have now, only the Back To Karkand expantion give new weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something that someone should suggest to the Battlefield Twitter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a Twitter so I would appreciate if someone did this for me. I want a option where I can set my spawn prefences. Right now I'm using the UMP 45 and each time I spawn, I set it to 2 round burst and turn off the tac light till I need it. I would like if I can set an option that I spawn the way I want and not full auto. Most of the time I don't use full auto unless its a machine gun. Ghost Recon had this option and I liked it. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 13:26, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excited ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im excited that this game will be more realistic than most others. I like the fact we will also be able to use selector switches. Did I hear right? The UMP-45 has a two round burst mode? I wasn't aware the UMP had a burst mode. I always thought it had Semi and auto.--[[User:Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can have a semi, 2-round burst, auto trigger group option. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:48, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Duh, that's what manufacturer's sites for ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.heckler-koch.de/HKWebText/detailPara/1926/82/4/20/213 UMP on H&amp;amp;K's European site]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/ump_specs.asp UMP on H&amp;amp;K's US site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H&amp;amp;K is usually pretty good about having burst option trigger packs. You just don't hear about it very often because in most movies and television shows, the selector is always set to rock n roll.--[[User:GLOCK10mil|GLOCK10mil]] 18:22, 2 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Back To Karkand Weapons ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=4707&amp;amp;sid=91faa55311d7c875027fba7bd657d6fb&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A whole bunch of leaked info, from the game files I believe. The working names for some SP missions, and all the Co-op and MP maps too, as well as the unique to BTK weapon list. Note that they incorrectly call the HK53 an MP5, even though it actually was called HK53 in BF2 :confused face: As of now it is unknown whether these will carry over to the standard game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L85A2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-FAMAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBZ-95B&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-HK53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MGs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBB-95&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-MG36&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sniper Rifles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-L96&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-QBU-88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SMG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-PP-19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shotgun&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Jackhammer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:33, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LOL, Jackhammer is back. That was the only prototype gun in BF2 xD&lt;br /&gt;
:'''@Alex''' HK53 was the carbine for Euro Force's Spec Ops class. Whether MP5 was the submachine gun for USMC's Anti-Tank class ;) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 04:08, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Edit:''' Ah, I've read the thread. There are probably going to be both weapons in the DLC \o/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure would love to see the FAMAS. I was secretly hoping for the XM8 to return, but I guess you can't get everything. [[user:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 11:40, 3 October 2011&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The XM8 did return, it's called the G36. They just didn't put it inside a silly plastic model spaceship. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 11:19, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well said. I have to agree you on that, I prefer the actual G36 rather than the 'uber-futuristic-tacticool' plastic prototype that is... wait, was... wait it didn't even leave the prototype stages... well anyways, that is the xm8 --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] 12:23, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== .44 Magnumn, M60, USAS-12 and Claymore gameplay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Found some videos of the Claymore and Revolver in action, looks like the T-44 is just called .44 Magnum any idea what kind of revolver it is? Also M60E4 is seen in one vid with a 200 round capacity and USAS-12 with a 7 round box mag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLW7WcIv_gA&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExvIOmviDgw&amp;amp;feature=mfu_in_order&amp;amp;list=UL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 16:06, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a [[Taurus Model 44]]. - [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] 16:28, 3 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess DICE followed IW's example. They named Colt Anaconda simply &amp;quot;.44 Magnum&amp;quot; before. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:35, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm liking the new .44 Magnum from what Videos I've seen so far. Up close it seems to behave just like how a .44 Magnum should. At short-close range (10 or less feet) it seems to kill in one shot to the upper chest/head but further distances (up to say 30-40 feet) seem to kill in 2 shots to the body or one to the head. Plus with addition of a Scoped version, I can see this being the ideal &amp;quot;Mini-Sniper&amp;quot;. I think the way there going about it is the MP412 is the better option up close while the .44 Mag is better at range. [[User:Draco122|Draco122]] 07:28, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was reading the description of the HK416 on the main page and there is something I don't quite understand.&lt;br /&gt;
In the main page it states that the weapon in-game has 3 firing modes; semi, 3-round burst and auto and that there aren't many Stoner lower receivers that support 3 firing modes. But isn't the Stoner platform manufactured by KAC? And why is it being use on a HK manufactured weapon? And if that is the case, then shouldn't it be pointed out as custom HK416?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And my other question is about the licensing of the weapons. Since there are other HK weapons that goes by their correct names like the MP7A1, G36C, M27 IAR and M320. Why would they license those particular weapons and not the HK416, making DICE name it M416? I think is most likely a misunderstanding rather than a copyright issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please correct me here if I'm wrong. [[User:Santos|Santos]] 01:24, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Devs are hell-bent on making HK416 the US' service rifle. Can't think of any other reason. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:38, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe it's because &amp;quot;HK416&amp;quot; has HK's company name right there in the weapon name. It might be more of a copyright thing. [[User:Gato|Gato]] 21:01, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eugene Stoner is the inventor of the the AR 15/AR10/M16/M4. The name for the platform as a whole is the Stoner. There are over 100 manufacturers of AR 15s in the US. --[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 17:55, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably what Masterius and Gato said, the Devs really, really want the HK416 to be the US standard (cause it ID better) :) And it has HK in the name, same reason the Glocks are G17/18. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 21:11, 4 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Although Battlefield 2 had HK21 and HK53... And this makes me curious. Are they going to rename HK53 if/when it comes back? --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 01:50, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh right, well then it's probably the same reason the Striker is still the DAO-12, they kept the name the same as it's always been in BF. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 02:52, 5 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glitch with the PDR? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else notice whenever you're using the PDR, It randomly switches from a 20 round mag to a 30 round mag? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:45, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently the extended mags are included by default.  They're taken off if you have any barrel attachment. --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 11:58, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Screenshots ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.enterbf3.com/viewtopic.php?t=5033&amp;amp;sid=fa2af8c4723e98f64dadab8b5b9897d8&lt;br /&gt;
At the bottom. In one we can see a suppressed M40A5, and in on of the AKS-74U ones we can see his Coop buddy has a KH2002. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:54, 7 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS iron-sights ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone remember which sight you would use in the beta if you were using an M26 mounted on one of the assault rifles? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] 17:48, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I never used the M26 in the beta, but with the M320 mounted on a rifle you would just zoom halfway in, a la the shotguns in previous Battlefield games. I reckon that the M26 would do the same. [[User:Krakydak|Krakydak]] 17:56, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same irons as the P90, Striker, F2000, M40A3, and M98B; the aftermarket ones. Oh wait, ON the AR? The AR's sights, like Crysis 2. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:29, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why is the &amp;quot;RPK 74M&amp;quot; chambered in 7.62x39 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111001163136/battlefield/images/5/5f/RPK-74M.png Look here]... note the curvature of the magazine, the lack of the flash hider, the steel ribbed mag.... why can't games ever get the RPK right? Either putting a 75 round drum on the 74M, or this....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A lot of the pics on Battlelog were wrong, like the G18's pic was a 17, but it does have the selector in game. Let me see an in game pic with the 7.62 mag, and I'll agree. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 18:36, 15 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rather odd that [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/ak74m_656x369.png?cb=1317663410 AK-74M] has proper image but [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/rpk_656x369.png?cb=1317663545 RPK-74M] has black RPK (not even RPKM) instead. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 03:06, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::On a side note: do 45-round STANAG magazines even exist? Talking about [http://web-vassets.ea.com/Assets/Richmedia/Image/Screenshots/m27_656x369.png?cb=1317664019 M27].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110929075021/battlefield/images/6/69/RPK_-_Beta.gif] that's it in first person, trust me the mag is a 7.62 ribbed steel mag in the game, I can't find a screenshot, but you can see it in the right light while reloading....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes! Not military issue, but I don't get the point of the M27 as a support weapon IRL, this helps at least. http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=26456/Product/AR-15-M16-45-ROUND-MAGAZINE [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 04:37, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, cool. Didn't know that :) --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 05:49, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like I didn't know that stuff about the AKs, it's what we're all here for :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 06:19, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah! :D --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 06:52, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renders ==&lt;br /&gt;
Right now I am adding renders of all the weapons from the offical site. In case anyone thinks I missed them, the MP-443, M16A3, F2000 Tactical, KH2002, M16A4, AKS-74U, M4, A-91, and GP-30 do not have entries there yet, but I will add them here when they do. Well, except the GP-30, because I doubt it will get one... poor GP-30 :'( EDIT: Done! :D [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 01:43, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for this being offtopic:&lt;br /&gt;
:I wish Devs added [http://www.fnherstal.com/index.php?id=271&amp;amp;backPID=265&amp;amp;productID=89&amp;amp;pid_product=297&amp;amp;pidList=265&amp;amp;categorySelector=7&amp;amp;detail=&amp;amp;cHash=a367c3feaf GL1] to F2000, [http://www.hkpro.com/index.php?Itemid=5&amp;amp;catid=20:all-other-weapons&amp;amp;id=36:the-hk79-underbarrel-grenade-launcher&amp;amp;option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article HK79] to G3 and [http://kbptula.ru/eng/str/strelk/556a91.htm the unnamed UGL] to A-91 (with the barrel length of 415 mm (same as AK-74M), it would be classified as assault rifle (compact one though, because its overall length is lesser than that of AK-74M with stock folded [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_a91m_eng.html] [http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_avtomat_ak-74m_eng.html] )). But that's probably would be too much to ask :( --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:54, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would have been nice, though, the F2000's GL1 is solved by not letting it mount a GL, and we haven't seen one mounted to the G3 yet. Who knows, maybe it will become an HK79 like the GP-30 :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 03:06, 17 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== KH2002 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things: this site doesn't have a KH2002 page, and if there's a newer version from 2009, shouldn't they have named it KH2009? [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 15:46, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't even find any sources mentioning 2009. They just say KH2002 was revealed to public\entered service in 2004 and show the pictures of either long carrying handle or short carrying handle (the most seen one) variant :\ --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:37, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::There are 3 different versions of the KH2002 I have seen. The first is the initial 2002 model which has a short carry handle and front sight post at the front of the receiver. Then there is the 2006 model that has a long carry handle and no front sight post. Lastly there is the 2009 model that has the long carry handle but a barrel mounted front sight post along with a built up finger grooved front grip. Not sure about the dates, but this is deffinitely the way the KH2002 design progressed. I have also heard that there are three different barrel lengths for the KH2002, but I have only seen the standard length (pictured) and the short barrel, which was on an original model, with the barrel ending at the end of the receiver. Have never seen a picture of the DMR length barrel. As for the name being KH2002, all I can say is that M1903s made in the 30s were called M1903A1s and not M1930s. It is basically the same rifle, so why change the name.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 05:31, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah true, I guess I'm just thinking there should be some way to tell them apart by name. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:53, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:After a bit of research, I found out that the version in this game (have seen exactly the same gun with and without front sight post so not sure which is the correct one, or maybe it is detached when optics are added which appear to be a copy of the old Colt 4x20 scope) is not called the Khaybar but the Sama, so will change the article accordingly.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 08:24, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Makarov PB (6P9) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dogtags :) http://www.enterbf3.com/news/579-159-battlefield-3-dog-tags/ What's interesting is, if you look below the M39 in the bottom rightish, there's a Makarov PB, beside the suppressed M9. I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a suppressed MP-443, or if it will actually be in, but it's very interesting. Also note a lot of weapons seem to be missing, most likely since this isn't the full selection of dogtags. Oh, and there's two P90s, someone screwed up :P [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 23:30, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ya the USAS-12 dogtag shows a SPAS-12 instead--[[User:Anarchy66660|Anarchy66660]] 01:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The designer of PB isn't Makarov, it's Deryagin[http://zonawar.ru/rash_guns/rg_spesial_pb_eng.html] :| --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 02:17, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I was just assuming it was Makarov :/ At any rate, has it ever been in a BF game before? If it's in this one I'm gonna totally use it with the AS :) [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 05:52, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Makarov but still no USP? :( [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 08:29, 19 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Heckler_%26_Koch_G36&amp;diff=472926</id>
		<title>Talk:Heckler &amp; Koch G36</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Heckler_%26_Koch_G36&amp;diff=472926"/>
		<updated>2011-10-19T04:44:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* MG36 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Additional Variants==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mod._G36-1-.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36K with the stock removed and two magazines clipped together as used in the film ''[[Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines]]'' - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K-SL8.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler and Koch SL8-1 with ZF 3x4° dual optical sight and Harris bipod - 5.56x45mm (.223)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a Question about the SL8, it seems silly, but is it integrally suppressed?&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Revolver|Revolver]], not at all silly question, but no.  None of the SL8s have integral silencers.  They have heavy barrels but I have never seen one outfitted to take a silencer either.  The three SL8 Variants you see on the page are my personal guns, so I am just working from that. ;) There may be variations somewhere that I don't know about, but I can assure you that such a modification is a custom aftermarket modification.   [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 09:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As far as I know, the only Heckler &amp;amp; Koch weapon that comes with a silencer from the factory is the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5SD|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP5SD]] submachine gun. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 08:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In the [[NCIS: Naval Criminal Investigative Service]] episode &amp;quot;Rule Fifty-One,&amp;quot; NCIS Special Agent Ziva David used a suppressed SL8. How on Earth did she get an SL8 that had a threaded barrel?--[[User:L.J. Gibbs|L.J. Gibbs]] 03:42, 12 March 2011 (MSK)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if this counts as integrally suppressed, but on HKPRO.COM, there is something advertised as the SL9-SD.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.hkpro.com/sl9sd.htm (Here is a little better description of the SL-9-SD (http://www.hksystems.com.au/rifles/SL9SD%20Whisper.htm). (Paladin308)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinda reminds me of the suppressed sniper rifle in Far Cry: Instincts.&lt;br /&gt;
hkpro.com is also a good site for pics/info pertaining to hk products, btw.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool! It looks neat.  It's an SL8 with a threaded barrel for their suppressor.  Other than  the addition of a PSG-01 style trigger,  I don't see much of a difference, except they did not subdue the &amp;quot;bright red&amp;quot; HK logos on the stocks.  I may have to convert one of my SL8 rifles to that configuration.  ;)  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 07:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could a G36 take the role of a Designated Marksman Rifle, if the Designated Marksman lost it rifle. in a story im writing for fun a former Designated Marksman use a G36 as his main rifle, and carys is Mark 14 Mod 0 Enhanced Battle Rifle for sharpshooting. I was wounding if it was a good chose REX095&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably. Any semi-automatic weapon that can take an optic can be a DMR, as long as it has greater accuracy than a standard model; I'd probably have him use a Springfield M1A Match instead of the G36, because it's basically a civilian model of the M14 with around the same inherent accuracy. It's semi-auto only, but a DMR isn't exactly going to use a full-auto weapon either, so it works out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/72.189.150.170|72.189.150.170]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why would one take an M1A and a Mark 14 into battle at the same time? That makes no sense because doing so wouldn't provide any kind of advantage as you'd have two weapons that are of the same basic classification. What Rex095 is asking is if a G36 (his character's primary ''defensive'' weapon) can take over the role of DMR if his EBR (his marksman rifle, which itself is selectable between semi-automatic and full automatic) goes down. Rex, as the guy above me said, any semi-auto rifle can perform in a limited DMR role, but accuracy is likely going to be sub-par compared to a dedicated DMR. If your character has the resources, equip his G36 with a heavier barrel (e.g., an MG36 barrel) which will give better accuracy than a standard G36 barrel in case the EBR goes down and it's needed to fulfill the DMR role. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 04:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G36C== &lt;br /&gt;
:Why is this gun in just about every new action movie and video game that feature large amounts of gunplay? I'm getting tired of seeing this gun and wonder why there are barely any other of the G36 series in movies and video games-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 00:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why is it I hear lots of &amp;quot;I'm tired of (insert fairly new weapon here) when no one ever says &amp;quot;I'm tired of seeing those M4s. Theyre in every new action movie and video game and I'm sick of it&amp;quot; when that last statement is actually true? S&amp;amp;W, I don't know about you, but I don't see the G36C as much as many many other kinds of weapons. Personally I'm getting very sick of seeing overly-upgraded M4 or M16 rifles and all the Beretta 92-like guns going around out there. I think seeing more of the G36 family would be a refreshing change. Any other gun that deserves more attention would be nice. Where are all the Mk. 46s and the REC-7s? I've only seen those in R6V2 and if you ask me were misrepresented terribly. And am I the only one upset over losing the G36 in MW2? I was hoping for the full size version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like seeing more gun variety in movies and games, so as long as it makes some sense (i.e., not stuff like random street thugs in Predator 2 pulling out Steyr AUGs). Contrary to what some naive or misinformed souls may believe, Colt is not &amp;quot;teh ownly gun manufacturer wurth showing&amp;quot; on screen or in games, and not everyone uses a M16 or an M4 or an AK-47. The G36 is a perfectly good gun to round out the arsenal on screen or in games. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the same token:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The FN P90 is not the only PDW/Armour-piercing SMG worth showing on screen or in games--the MP7 and SR-3 Vikhr or the OTs-14 Groza are both perfectly suitable for the same role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-M60s and M249 SAWs are not the only light machine guns that are effective or useful--PKMs, MG36s, QBB-95s, or even older ones like the MG42 are perfectly viable and useful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The firearms industry has always been fiercely competitive and people from different factions often use different weapons in real life.  More gun variety in games usually means more possible playstyles available and less of a chance that someone will get bored looking at the same gun all the time. For instance, despite the ejection ports being in the wrong places and the reliability factors largely in favour of Warsaw pact weapons vs. NATO weapons, STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl's gun selection was good for both the variety and the various playstyles it encouraged.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully movie armourers and game developers will put in more reasonable gun variety in those two media forms. Even in real life I highly doubt any one firearms company will end up establishing an unbreakable monopoly, forcing gun monotony on us all. [[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]] 02:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
GOD, I hated Infinity Ward for taking the G36C out of MW2, as I am a HUGE G36 fan. But to your point, [[User:Mazryonh|Mazryonh]]: Weapons like the Remington ACR, HK G36, IMI Tavor, HK MP7, FNH F2000... Newer, more modern weapons like these don't see NEARLY enough movie use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The way I see it, when it comes down to it, you have these as perhaps the 10 most cliched weapons in the media (not in any particular order):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1: M16/M4 Assault Rifle series&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2: Beretta 92FS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3: Franchi SPAS-12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4: HK MP5A3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5: FNH P90 PDW&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6: FNH M249 S.A.W.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7: Glock Safe-Action Pistols (Any model, but the 18 is the most cliched, no doubt about it)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8: Desert Eagle (Models VII and XIX)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9: Steyr AUG A1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10: Saco Defense M60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exception of the Desert Eagle (Gotta love it), we've seen and re-seen these guns WAY too much if you ask me, but no one ever complains about it. WTF is up with that?&lt;br /&gt;
On the other end of the spectrum, you have some firearms that need to see more use (also not in any particular order):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1: HK G36 Assault Rifle series&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2: Remington ACR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3: FNH F2000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4: IMI Tavor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5: HK MP7A1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6: Steyr AUG A3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7: M14 (Both the Original and the Mk. 14 EBR as well)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8: Saiga 20K (PGO)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9: TDI Vector&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10: FNH M249 S.P.W.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if this got a bit long, but I just wanted to put it out there.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GamerfreakB7|GamerfreakB7]]--Destroying the world, one hippie at a time. 04:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We don't see a lot of the &amp;quot;newer&amp;quot; guns like the ACR, TDI Vector or the ACR because I don't think any armorer has them yet. A Canadian armorer that did Resident Evil Apocalypse had a couple Tavors, 24 showed the MP7s and F2000. It's just that you have to look at the armorers. They can't have every single gun in their collection. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 05:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The weird thing about the Beretta 92 is that no one ever seems to have a Beretta 90-two, in the newer games/films.&lt;br /&gt;
:Claire uses a 90-Two in Resident Evil: Afterlife and the 90-Two is the most common handgun in Heavy Rain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I've never seen a Steyr M9/A1 in ANY film. Even in Fringe, they just used the Five-seveN as a futuristic stand-in; the world is supposed to be like ours, except different. The Steyr looks superficially like the Glock, but it has pretty out-there sights and is pretty different externally when you look at it up close. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And about the Saiga, I don't think I've seen a Saiga sporter (the original model from which the Saiga-20K is derived) in any film either. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/72.189.150.170|72.189.150.170]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I totally agree, when they next make a game about US soldiers in combat, they should give them all G36s, ACRs, Vektors, HK45s, and PSG1s even though they don't use them in the real world simply because the &amp;quot;old guns&amp;quot; are cliched *rolls eyes*. But, seriously, I ''am'' all for variety, but that variety needs to be sensible. LAPD SWAT or US Army SF suddenly appearing with Tavors or XM8s wouldn't make a lick of sense. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 05:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless a choice of gun makes up an important aspect of a character a gun is not a cliche. &amp;quot;Stay frosty&amp;quot; or the butler being the murderer are cliches, someone carrying a Beretta or a Colt is ''not a cliche''.--[[User:Mr-Jigsaw|Mr-Jigsaw]] 08:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't mind seeing more of the UMP, I haven't see much of that. [[User:That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck|That&amp;amp;#39;s One Angry Duck]] 22:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: the FN F2000 tactical is starting to turn up more in show&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reliability? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the G36 reliable when put through mud, water,and dirt(ex Ak-47, HK416)? or does it face similar problems the M16 family faces?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H&amp;amp;K 416 is basically a G36 operating system in an AR-15. So yeah, it is reliable in those conditions. The XM8 rifle was just a revamped G36, and it topped the 416's reliability by more than 200 rounds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for responding, also does this apply to other assualt rifles of this era too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/72.189.150.170|72.189.150.170]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about the fifty-plus other assault rifles (I only really know about the main ones and some irregular ones like the Vektor CR-21), but the newer H&amp;amp;K models are mostly based on the G36. It's the same relationship as the G3 on contemporary models (PSG1, etc), you know? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/72.189.150.170|72.189.150.170]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It even beat FN SCAR as it barely beated 416&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just wondering ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the G36C see any action at all in either american or british special forces?&lt;br /&gt;
---P226 21:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
im not quite shure about the american special forces but yes it is actualy used by britsh speical forces not as heavaly as shown is movies and vidio games but is still a comon weapon in there arsenal --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 23:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have never heard of either American or British SF carrying G36 variants. Both use AR-series rifles. It's possible they may have purchased some G36s, but that's irrelevant, because those guys purchase a little of everything. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 00:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well maybe this is a better question... Does the G36C model have any use in the special forces comunity at all?, and does it have any conventional military use?---P226 21:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think anyone on here is going to be able to tell you anything more accurate than what can be found on Wikipedia. It's not like any of us are in SF units. Assuming the Wikipedia article is accurate, the G36C seems to be used almost entirely by law enforcement at present. Whereas the M4 is pretty much the weapon-of-choice for every SF unit that is in good standing with the U.S. I would highly doubt that the G36C would be used by regular infantry, given that its barrel is too short for the engagement distances that infantry expect to face. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 21:27, 15 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
S019 the standard british armed police response units and british airport security both have access to and utilise G36c's, thought these UK models are restiriced to semi automatic only. In most cases in airports when Ive seen a pair of officers one wiull be carrying an Mp5 with a 15 round mag and the other a G36 with a full 30 round mag. So there you have it --[[User:Captain Snikt|Captain Snikt]] 11:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. P226 specifically asked about ''military special forces'' (American and British). SO19 (now CO19) are not military SF. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 21:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
well i know the G36c is the standerd weapon on german special forces like GSG-9,Kommando Spezialkräfte and Fernspählehrkompanie 200 but like MT2008 said know one really knows --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 21:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Last I heard (on the HKPRO message board), the KSK traded in its G36s for HK416s a few years ago. I remember there was a picture of them training for deployment to Afghanistan while using 416s with 14.5&amp;quot; barrels that were all painted in desert camo. They allegedly wanted to buy M4s, but the Bundeswehr doesn't let them buy anything that isn't German-made. Also, it's still irrelevant because (as I told Captain Snikt) P226 asked about '''American''' and '''British''' special forces. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 21:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
no i was talking about his second comment --[[User:Armyguy277|Armyguy277]] 22:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:what about Jordon's CT-71 Battalion, from what I have read it is a CT unit that is made up of Rangers, Paratroopers and Royal Guard members? ([http://www.tactical-life.com/online/tactical-weapons/all-the-king%E2%80%99s-men/ 1] ) --[[Special:Contributions/129.89.179.105|129.89.179.105]] 23:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)(thePotShot)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barrel lenghts==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure the standard G36 has a 20&amp;quot; barrel and the G36C has a 9&amp;quot; barrel but can anyone tell me the lengths of the other variants? I've heard people claim the G36K has a barrel anywhere from 12 to 16 inches long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12.51&amp;quot; according to the HK website ([http://www.heckler-koch.de/HKWeb/show/frameContent/19/4/19 Source]). It also lists the G36 as 18.89&amp;quot; and the G36C as 8.97&amp;quot;. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 22:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Confused about SL8 variants ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title says it all. Below is something I found on the HKPRO forums (which agrees with wiki not that necessarily matters) that seems to disagree with how the rifles are numbered on this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SL8(no -#) Canada/Europe, gray, double stack mag, long sight rail w/iron sights.&lt;br /&gt;
SL8-1 is US import, gray, single stack mag &amp;amp; receiver, long sight rail w/iron sights.&lt;br /&gt;
SL8-4 is Canada/Europe, black, double stack mag, short sight rail.&lt;br /&gt;
SL8-5 is Canada/Europe, black, double stack mag, long rail w/iron sights.&lt;br /&gt;
SL8-6 is US import, black, single stack mag &amp;amp; receiver, short sight rail. &amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it therefore be correct to say that of the 4 pictures on the main page, all of the first 3 are SL8-1's (as it is stated in the captions that the colour is aftermarket blacking) and the last one is an SL8-6 (If you go the HK-USA civilian sales page, it advertises a gun looking exactly like this as a SL8-6). Below is a pictures of what I believe to be an SL8-4 and SL8-5.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HK SL8-4.jpg|thumb|500px|none|SL8-4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SL8-5.jpg|thumb|500px|none|SL8-5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't changed the page yet, as I thought I would check I had understood it right, as this is all based on about 15 minutes of googling.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muzzle Velocity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! Could anyone tell me what's the muzzle velocity of both K and C variants of the G36? I only found MV of the standard G36 on HK's official website!&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Telling a Fake vs Real G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a rule of thumb should I assume that if I see a G36C with a 1/2 full magazine that it is an airosoft replica?  Just making sure as it seems all the airosoft replicas have 1/2 full magazines.--[[User:Gunkatas|Gunkatas]] 18:18, 13 July 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think all the airsoft magazines I've ever seen were actually full (Just checking, you do know that bullets don't go all the way to the bottom of a magazine and that there needs to be space for the compressed spring at the bottom?). Have just counted in a TM magazine and there were 22 dummy bullets, but they don't go all the way to to top, there is room for about 4 or 5 more. Furthermore, an airsoft magazine is shorter than a real magazine, so add on a few more and that brings you to the full 30. A half empty magazine would be much harder for an airsoft gun, as you should then be able to see clear space through the partially uncompressed spring, rather than the gubbins for the BBs that is actually inside.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 14:52, 3 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SL8 model Guide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am just putting this in here as I have notice a different models getting confused with each other on several pages.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sl8 original.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch SL8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hk sl8-1.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch SL8-1]]&lt;br /&gt;
*SL8-2 is a rare prototype weapon made for the German Army that was fitted with G36 type sights and a bipod.&lt;br /&gt;
*Never heard of an SL8-3, if it exists it is a very rare version unlikely to appear.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:HK SL8-4.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch SL8-4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SL8-5.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch SL8-5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hk sl8-6.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch SL8-6]]&lt;br /&gt;
First off, to definitely tell the variant you need to be able to see the right side of the rifle. If the magazine well along with the receiver below the ejection port is crimped in, then it is a US import version (SL8-1 or SL8-6) that can only take single stack magazines (10 round magazine protrudes out a few inches, aftermarket 20 round magazines are made which are longer than a G36 magazine). Apart from the colour of the plastic and the scope rail, the SL8-6 is exactly the same as the SL8-1. So much so, H&amp;amp;K used the same moulds to make the first run of the SL8-6 which resulted in the first SL8-6s being marked SL8-1. Current models of the SL8-6 are simply marked SL8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a rifle lacks the crimped magazine area, then it is a European/Canadian version of the Rifle. These use double stack magazines where only the baseplate of the mag protrudes from the weapon. These guns can take G36 magazines with only slight modification to the magazine (filing off a couple of ridges). The US-import versions can be converted to use G36 magazines but this requires extensive modification, including replacement of the magazine well, a new bolt head that will strip rounds from a double stack magazine, milling out of the crimped portion of the receiver and filling in this gap with epoxy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, if the magazine of the weapon protrudes out a few centimetres before the baseplate then this is an Airsoft replica.--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 10:19, 8 August 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MG36 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technically, an MG36 is a G36 with a Beta C drum magazine and a bipod right? So all i have to do is take my normal, original G36, add a bipod and a Beta C drum mag, and it will be considered an MG36?--[[User: Gunner5|Gunner5]]&lt;br /&gt;
:The MG36 also had a heavier hand picked barrel (only thicker under the handguard so impossible to tell the difference), and possibly a newer version of the sight that was 3.5x but not sure if the last part is true. Bear in mind that nobody actually bought the MG36 so less than 100 were made. It was decided that the changes to the barrel did not make enough difference to warrant the cost of making different parts, and instead the Bundeswehr did what you are suggesting and simply fitted a bi-pod handguard and drum to a regular G36 to act as an LSW. So basically, there will most likely never be a real MG36 in anything as there aren't many about, and if there was we wouldn't know as the exterior is identical.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 19:20, 11 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Just to point out why I reverted the image; from what I can tell, the only production run of MG36s was in 1995, when about a hundred were delivered to the Bundeswehr for testing and rejected. The MIL-STD-1913 standard was established in February of that same year. As a result, any &amp;quot;MG36&amp;quot; with rail mounts is probably just a G36-LMG or whatever they call the drum / bipod handguard variant. This means we should probably change any videogame entries that have rails and say they're MG36s, because they're not. 01:38, 29 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this thread is already made there's no need to make a new one. Anyway I have a question for some of the military gurus. Did any military outfit ever use the MG36 or was it deemed ineffective compared to other lmgs/automatic rifles? I'm in an argument with a friend who insists he German army used the MG36 but I've said they've been using the Rhienmetall MG3. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 23:44, 18 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:XXX&amp;diff=471980</id>
		<title>Talk:XXX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:XXX&amp;diff=471980"/>
		<updated>2011-10-16T15:11:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* MP5 with M203? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Interesting==&lt;br /&gt;
Hmmm. IMFDB won't allow us to type in the actual CORRECT TITLE for this movie, which is &amp;quot;xXx&amp;quot;.  Because it won't allow a lower case letter to start a title.  But the actual official title (per IMDB and the movie poster) is &amp;quot;xXx&amp;quot; (lower case x, Upper case X and then a lower case x).   I hate it when software doesn't allow us the ability do to things 'out of the box'.... :(  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 02:52, 19 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wikipedia's article is at &amp;quot;XXx,&amp;quot; but they seem to have a template (DISPLAYTITLE) which makes the correct name display. Let me have a look... [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 19 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hm, seems complicated. I'd probably have to work out how a bunch of associated templates work to get it working over here. Still, I'll have a go next time I'm off work. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:03, 19 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this might need Bunni's attention, actually. DISPLAYTITLE, according to the mediawiki documentation I've hunted down, shouldn't need a special template (and you can get rid of that page), it needs a server-side option called &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;$wgAllowDisplayTitle&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to be set. If I'm reading Special:Version right we're also running slightly old version of Mediawiki software on the site. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:39, 19 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FNC, not HK-33 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rifle that Vin Diesel uses during the raid on the fortress is not actually a HK-33, but a FNC that is equipped with a Beta-C mag and telescopic sight. More details can be found on the weapon in this link: [http://www.longmountain.com/movieguns/XXX Long Mountain Outfitter's page on XXX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
05:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Screencaps==&lt;br /&gt;
I just did some screencaps for xXx to fill the page out a little better. I'll add them to the site tommorow. -GM45&lt;br /&gt;
:What do you guys think of the improved xXx page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steyr TMP==&lt;br /&gt;
::It's great now (you have such a good eye for shots of the guns). Only thing is, maybe a few more shots of Yelena with the MP9? -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunantly it's not a MP-9 but a Steyr TMP with the detachable stock that Steyr offered and an aftermarket scope mount installed. Not in the photos that the stock in the screencaps has no pivots and the barrel is nearly identical to the one shown in TMP photos. [[User:Rockwolf66|Rockwolf66]]&lt;br /&gt;
::It's a Brugger &amp;amp; Thorbet MP9. Why did you change you DUMB@$$!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hey, chill. He might actually be right. Personally, I can't really tell if the stock is fixed (in which case, the gun is probably a TMP with an aftermarket stock added) or an MP-9 with a folding stock. Unless you can give a more substantiated explanation for why the gun is an MP-9 (specific details you see identifying it as such), then you have no right to call Rockwolf a &amp;quot;dumbass&amp;quot;. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 01:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Don't worry about it MT. [[User:Rockwolf66|Rockwolf66]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I for one think you are 100% right. The top doesn't have picattiny rails, and the C-more sight is mounted customly. The stock is likely an aftermarket add on, or another custom job. The dude who cursed you out doesn't even know how to write the gun's name or spell, so ignore him. Brugger and ''Thorbet''? &amp;quot;Changr&amp;quot;? And he's missing an &amp;quot;it&amp;quot; after &amp;quot;changr&amp;quot;. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::''Thorbet'' is what they call ''Sorbet'' in San Francisco...... MPM2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's a TMP modified to take a folding stock.  They DID have folding stocks available for the TMP and also the others are right, a close look at the body of the weapon indicates it is a TMP.  It lacks the changes made in the B&amp;amp;T gun design  Just putting my 2 cents in [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, it was a typo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::...and I also apologize for my profane launge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I should of read the talk page first. Plus here's a little info about me: I'm 13 about to turn 14 and live in Indiana. So how can I create my own user acount?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't help but laugh my ass of to the statement above this one. He first apologizes for a typo then for his profane &amp;quot;launge&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
hahahahahahahaha&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CZ-83 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CZ-83 is a .380 ACP or .32 ACP, not a 9x19mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source. [http://cz-usa.com/products/view/cz-83/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;serrated blade&amp;quot; under the barrel isn't actually a blade, if you look at the second screenshot, it's rounded. But if it's not a blade, what is it? And what's that strange ring on the end of the barrel?&lt;br /&gt;
:The blading is likely just in use like a barrel weight, to make the front end heavier, and the ring on the end is a muzzle break. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:the description on the page still says, the barrel weight is some kind of picatinny rail system....could this be rewritten, because it clearly isn't a rail to attach something.&lt;br /&gt;
:also on the picture showing the load of two regular bullets and four special bullets, it says that the purple ones would be blood splatter darts....this is incorrect. the red ones are blood splatter darts while the purple ones are explosive bullets. it is evident by the fact, that XXX uses one explosive dart to blow up the electro-box in the fortress.&lt;br /&gt;
:the fact that the special bullets look like buttons might be explained that the holes are vent-ports for some compressed gas that is used to propell the darts at less than lethal velocities (it looks quite similar to the gyrojet rounds used in the James Bond movie &amp;quot;you only live twice&amp;quot;) [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:12, 12 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, though the rims on the bullets would kinda stop them ever actually leaving the cylinder. I've changed the entry; I really think the serrated thingy is just there for looks, since I can't see how it would do anything other than make the gun more likely to snag on stuff when you draw it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:32, 19 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Damn this movie loves C-more sights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wonder i they were paid to advertise or just thought they looked cool?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This movie only?  C-More sights are very common in movies generally (far more common than they are in the real world). It probably has little to do with advertising; more because they're inexpensive and look very high-tech.  Check out ''[[Air Force One]]'', ''[[Soldier]]'', ''[[Live Free or Die Hard]]'', ''[[Terminator Salvation]]'', etc. for starters. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 16:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Air pistol is not a crosman 2240, but a Webley &amp;amp; Scott Tempest or Hurricane==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the scene at the restaurant, Xander is shot with a dart from a Tempest or Hurricane, not from a 2240. &lt;br /&gt;
The tempest is a spring powered air pistol, the 2240 is CO2 powered.&lt;br /&gt;
You can see the difference between the rear sights and at the front.&lt;br /&gt;
A Crosman 2240 has a round tube under the barrel, the tempest hasnt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who thinks that the custom S&amp;amp;W 629 is totally badass?&lt;br /&gt;
::Are you that 13 yr old profane kid, again? (just curious) mpm2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP5 with M203? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there even any point to that on an smg? Is it just me, or does that sound tactically retarded? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:11, 16 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=471190</id>
		<title>Talk:Rocky Mountain Arms Patriot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=471190"/>
		<updated>2011-10-14T23:13:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Technically it is an ultra-compact semi auto carbine AR-15 variant. If we can have The Colt 9mm smg (which I consider an abomination to the AR-10 derived weapons) in that section, shouldn't this be thrown in as well? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:13, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A possible explanation is that every weapon on the M16 page is either an original Colt Design, a clone of a Colt Design or a replica or impersonator of a Colt Design.  Colt NEVER created a weapon like this, so it is listed under it's original manufacturer.  A thought. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:39, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, I suppose you're right, didn't think of that. I guess if you were to put this in the AR-15 page you'd have to put the H&amp;amp;K HK-series of rifles in and the KAC SR25s etc., and it'd just create a big mess. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:12, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=471189</id>
		<title>Talk:Rocky Mountain Arms Patriot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=471189"/>
		<updated>2011-10-14T23:12:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? Technically it is an ultra-compact semi auto carbine AR-15 variant. If we can have The Colt 9mm smg (which I consider an abomination to the AR-10 derived weapons) in that section, shouldn't this be thrown in as well? Lurker McNasty 00:25, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A possible explanation is that every weapon on the M16 page is either an original Colt Design, a clone of a Colt Design or a replica or impersonator of a Colt Design.  Colt NEVER created a weapon like this, so it is listed under it's original manufacturer.  A thought. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:39, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Technically it is an ultra-compact semi auto carbine AR-15 variant. If we can have The Colt 9mm smg (which I consider an abomination to the AR-10 derived weapons) in that section, shouldn't this be thrown in as well? Lurker McNasty 00:25, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A possible explanation is that every weapon on the M16 page is either an original Colt Design, a clone of a Colt Design or a replica or impersonator of a Colt Design.  Colt NEVER created a weapon like this, so it is listed under it's original manufacturer.  A thought. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 00:39, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, I suppose you're right, didn't think of that. I guess if you were to put this in the AR-15 page you'd have to put the H&amp;amp;K HK-series of rifles in and the KAC SR25s etc., and it'd just create a big mess. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 18:12, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=470773</id>
		<title>Talk:Rocky Mountain Arms Patriot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Rocky_Mountain_Arms_Patriot&amp;diff=470773"/>
		<updated>2011-10-14T05:25:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: Created page with &amp;quot;Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? Technically it is an ultra-compact semi auto carbine AR-15 variant. If we can have The Colt 9mm smg (which I consider an abomination to the ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why isn't this in the M16/AR-15 page? Technically it is an ultra-compact semi auto carbine AR-15 variant. If we can have The Colt 9mm smg (which I consider an abomination to the AR-10 derived weapons) in that section, shouldn't this be thrown in as well? Lurker McNasty 00:25, 14 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=469007</id>
		<title>Talk:Duke Nukem Forever</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=469007"/>
		<updated>2011-10-11T16:46:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Meh... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Censored? ==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the girls doing in the censored screenshot? Just making out? Do we really have to censor that? It's probably borderline SFW, but still SFW. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 18:10, 20 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DNF-1911c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Duke 'bout to collect his reward.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, unless there's something weird between the two of them, something that two people can do in public in real life without being arrested isn't something we should censor. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:09, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You are right, Tim. I don't know why was this image moved from the main page. With the censored part there is no reason for keeping it on the talk page. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:44, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, but it doesn't need the censored part, and having it there makes the site look rather overly prudish. If it's what it appears to be (ie, just the two of them), there are racier things shown on billboards. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:58, 23 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just played that section, didn't see anything wrong [[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 20:01, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Release Date ==&lt;br /&gt;
Changed the release date. It's June 14th, not June 10th. [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reception ==&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who thinks that 3 (or maybe more) developer studios, a crapload of dollars and 15 years were not enough to create something outstanding? I mean, the game sucked monkey balls. ''Serious Sam'' is way more fun and funny, at least for me. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Borderlands was fun, Duke Nukem Forever was not, let's see what Furious Four turns out to be. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:24, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Absolutely right. Borderlands is a great game, but is more like an RPG, you know with looting, leveling and buying and selling and stuff like that. Furious Four looks like Inglorious Basterds to me, and I really hate that movie so I won't look forward to it. There is also a &amp;quot;secret&amp;quot; project on Gearbox's page, I wonder if it is the game remake of [[Heat]]. That would be cool. Especially if Mann is also involved. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:05, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK then. Some time after Furious Four is released, Borderlands 2 will be released. And there are rumours about Borderworlds although I can't find out whether that's codename/subtitle for Borderlands 2 or separate game in the series (kind of like expanded universe). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:27, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah this game blew huge balls. i enjoyed Duke Nukem 3D but this was god awful. What a shame--[[User:Nuffmuffin|Nuffmuffin]] 16:10, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meh... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess I'm the only guy on here who likes Duke Nukem Forever. Oh well, I thought the game was really good when I played it, and I felt that it had the right amount of pop culture, movie, music and videogame references, hot women (especially in the 'Titty City' strip club level... heh, heh, &amp;gt;:D), good alien ass-kicking, a nice touch of interacting with various objects and characters in the environments throughout the levels, naughty moments, and some of the best and funniest lines delivered not only by the secondary characters of the game, but also by the man himself; Duke Nukem. Sure some of the mechanics of the game could have been better, the loading screens take a little bit too long on some occasions, and some other areas, characters, graphics and a bit of the plot in the game could have had a final polish before it went out the door (such as why the aliens chose to come back, what is their endgame to invading Earth again, and why every single damn captured woman in the Hive level constantly has alien babies bursting out from them, often forcing the players making Duke kill them first before that happens, and not having Duke be so remorseful about doing that like how he was in the last game, but instead cracking a joke or two after the players make him kill an alien-impregnated woman or if they die first when the alien offspring burst out). But for what it's worth, I really enjoyed Duke Nukem Forever and I think it's a good game, definitely something that should go on the list of 'Top 10 Videogames of 2011'. But for a 15 year wait, I guess you can't please everybody. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may very well be. DNF just can't compete with today's Modern Warfare, Battlefield, and Halo (if anyone still plays Reach, ugh). Duke Nukem was fun back in the day, when it's main competition were games like Goldeneye and Turok, but the people want more realistic shooters and more serious, story-orientated games.[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:24, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And if you like classic shooters, DNF sold out to the point it isn't one. Most of the &amp;quot;humour&amp;quot; doesn't work because the world is so focused on stroking Duke's ego it isn't even funny; it's like Johnny Bravo with everyone pretending he isn't pathetic for some reason. ''Shadows of the Damned'' managed juvenile humour far better because it refused to resort to ''worshipping'' Garcia Hotspur; he's allowed to be a big dumb lug. The mechanics don't work either; Duke is a wuss with two puny guns and hardly any ammo who can barely take any punishment at all, and the enviromental interaction comes down to playing with random objects in the hope of getting a reward which the game is designed around you getting. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:41, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::it really is sad to see how far Duke Nukem has fallen. It's kind of funny to see all the jabs and insults the game throws at other fps games like Halo, Half-Life, etc, and yet the game pretty much stole half of its gameplay from those same games. It's like stealing someones Ferrari then sending them pictures of you not knowing how to drive it at all. [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 11:46, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=469006</id>
		<title>Talk:Duke Nukem Forever</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=469006"/>
		<updated>2011-10-11T16:45:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Meh... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Censored? ==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the girls doing in the censored screenshot? Just making out? Do we really have to censor that? It's probably borderline SFW, but still SFW. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 18:10, 20 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DNF-1911c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Duke 'bout to collect his reward.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, unless there's something weird between the two of them, something that two people can do in public in real life without being arrested isn't something we should censor. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:09, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You are right, Tim. I don't know why was this image moved from the main page. With the censored part there is no reason for keeping it on the talk page. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:44, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, but it doesn't need the censored part, and having it there makes the site look rather overly prudish. If it's what it appears to be (ie, just the two of them), there are racier things shown on billboards. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:58, 23 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just played that section, didn't see anything wrong [[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 20:01, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Release Date ==&lt;br /&gt;
Changed the release date. It's June 14th, not June 10th. [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reception ==&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who thinks that 3 (or maybe more) developer studios, a crapload of dollars and 15 years were not enough to create something outstanding? I mean, the game sucked monkey balls. ''Serious Sam'' is way more fun and funny, at least for me. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Borderlands was fun, Duke Nukem Forever was not, let's see what Furious Four turns out to be. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:24, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Absolutely right. Borderlands is a great game, but is more like an RPG, you know with looting, leveling and buying and selling and stuff like that. Furious Four looks like Inglorious Basterds to me, and I really hate that movie so I won't look forward to it. There is also a &amp;quot;secret&amp;quot; project on Gearbox's page, I wonder if it is the game remake of [[Heat]]. That would be cool. Especially if Mann is also involved. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:05, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK then. Some time after Furious Four is released, Borderlands 2 will be released. And there are rumours about Borderworlds although I can't find out whether that's codename/subtitle for Borderlands 2 or separate game in the series (kind of like expanded universe). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:27, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah this game blew huge balls. i enjoyed Duke Nukem 3D but this was god awful. What a shame--[[User:Nuffmuffin|Nuffmuffin]] 16:10, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meh... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess I'm the only guy on here who likes Duke Nukem Forever. Oh well, I thought the game was really good when I played it, and I felt that it had the right amount of pop culture, movie, music and videogame references, hot women (especially in the 'Titty City' strip club level... heh, heh, &amp;gt;:D), good alien ass-kicking, a nice touch of interacting with various objects and characters in the environments throughout the levels, naughty moments, and some of the best and funniest lines delivered not only by the secondary characters of the game, but also by the man himself; Duke Nukem. Sure some of the mechanics of the game could have been better, the loading screens take a little bit too long on some occasions, and some other areas, characters, graphics and a bit of the plot in the game could have had a final polish before it went out the door (such as why the aliens chose to come back, what is their endgame to invading Earth again, and why every single damn captured woman in the Hive level constantly has alien babies bursting out from them, often forcing the players making Duke kill them first before that happens, and not having Duke be so remorseful about doing that like how he was in the last game, but instead cracking a joke or two after the players make him kill an alien-impregnated woman or if they die first when the alien offspring burst out). But for what it's worth, I really enjoyed Duke Nukem Forever and I think it's a good game, definitely something that should go on the list of 'Top 10 Videogames of 2011'. But for a 15 year wait, I guess you can't please everybody. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may very well be. DNF just can't compete with today's Modern Warfare, Battlefield, and Halo (if anyone still plays Reach, ugh). Duke Nukem was fun back in the day, when it's main competition were games like Goldeneye and Turok, but the people want more realistic shooters and more serious, story-orientated games.[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:24, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And if you like classic shooters, DNF sold out to the point it isn't one. Most of the &amp;quot;humour&amp;quot; doesn't work because the world is so focused on stroking Duke's ego it isn't even funny; it's like Johnny Bravo with everyone pretending he isn't pathetic for some reason. ''Shadows of the Damned'' managed juvenile humour far better because it refused to resort to ''worshipping'' Garcia Hotspur; he's allowed to be a big dumb lug. The mechanics don't work either; Duke is a wuss with two puny guns and hardly any ammo who can barely take any punishment at all, and the enviromental interaction comes down to playing with random objects in the hope of getting a reward which the game is designed around you getting. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 10:41, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::it really is sad to see how far Duke Nukem has fallen. It's kind of funny to see all the jabs and insults the game throws at other fps games like Halo, Half-Life, etc, and yet the game pretty much stole half of its gameplay from those same games. It's like stealing someones Ferrari then sending them pictures of you not knowing how to drive it at all.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=468986</id>
		<title>Talk:Duke Nukem Forever</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Duke_Nukem_Forever&amp;diff=468986"/>
		<updated>2011-10-11T15:24:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* Meh... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Censored? ==&lt;br /&gt;
What are the girls doing in the censored screenshot? Just making out? Do we really have to censor that? It's probably borderline SFW, but still SFW. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 18:10, 20 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DNF-1911c.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Duke 'bout to collect his reward.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, unless there's something weird between the two of them, something that two people can do in public in real life without being arrested isn't something we should censor. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:09, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You are right, Tim. I don't know why was this image moved from the main page. With the censored part there is no reason for keeping it on the talk page. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:44, 21 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, but it doesn't need the censored part, and having it there makes the site look rather overly prudish. If it's what it appears to be (ie, just the two of them), there are racier things shown on billboards. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 06:58, 23 May 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just played that section, didn't see anything wrong [[User:DeltaOne|DeltaOne]] 20:01, 19 June 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Release Date ==&lt;br /&gt;
Changed the release date. It's June 14th, not June 10th. [[User:SeanWolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reception ==&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who thinks that 3 (or maybe more) developer studios, a crapload of dollars and 15 years were not enough to create something outstanding? I mean, the game sucked monkey balls. ''Serious Sam'' is way more fun and funny, at least for me. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 15:58, 20 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Borderlands was fun, Duke Nukem Forever was not, let's see what Furious Four turns out to be. --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 09:24, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Absolutely right. Borderlands is a great game, but is more like an RPG, you know with looting, leveling and buying and selling and stuff like that. Furious Four looks like Inglorious Basterds to me, and I really hate that movie so I won't look forward to it. There is also a &amp;quot;secret&amp;quot; project on Gearbox's page, I wonder if it is the game remake of [[Heat]]. That would be cool. Especially if Mann is also involved. - [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:05, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK then. Some time after Furious Four is released, Borderlands 2 will be released. And there are rumours about Borderworlds although I can't find out whether that's codename/subtitle for Borderlands 2 or separate game in the series (kind of like expanded universe). --[[User:Masterius|Masterius]] 13:27, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah this game blew huge balls. i enjoyed Duke Nukem 3D but this was god awful. What a shame--[[User:Nuffmuffin|Nuffmuffin]] 16:10, 23 September 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meh... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess I'm the only guy on here who likes Duke Nukem Forever. Oh well, I thought the game was really good when I played it, and I felt that it had the right amount of pop culture, movie, music and videogame references, hot women (especially in the 'Titty City' strip club level... heh, heh, &amp;gt;:D), good alien ass-kicking, a nice touch of interacting with various objects and characters in the environments throughout the levels, naughty moments, and some of the best and funniest lines delivered not only by the secondary characters of the game, but also by the man himself; Duke Nukem. Sure some of the mechanics of the game could have been better, the loading screens take a little bit too long on some occasions, and some other areas, characters, graphics and a bit of the plot in the game could have had a final polish before it went out the door (such as why the aliens chose to come back, what is their endgame to invading Earth again, and why every single damn captured woman in the Hive level constantly has alien babies bursting out from them, often forcing the players making Duke kill them first before that happens, and not having Duke be so remorseful about doing that like how he was in the last game, but instead cracking a joke or two after the players make him kill an alien-impregnated woman or if they die first when the alien offspring burst out). But for what it's worth, I really enjoyed Duke Nukem Forever and I think it's a good game, definitely something that should go on the list of 'Top 10 Videogames of 2011'. But for a 15 year wait, I guess you can't please everybody. --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may very well be. DNF just can't compete with today's Modern Warfare, Battlefield, and Halo (if anyone still plays Reach, ugh). Duke Nukem was fun back in the day, when it's main competition were games like Goldeneye and Turok, but the people want more realistic shooters and more serious, story-orientated games.[[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:24, 11 October 2011 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=468866</id>
		<title>Battlefield 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Battlefield_3&amp;diff=468866"/>
		<updated>2011-10-11T07:09:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lurker McNasty: /* FN F2000 Tactical */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{upcoming}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3-pc-cover.jpg|thumb|300px|right|''Battlefield 3'' (2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Battlefield 3'' (also known as ''BF3'') the is upcoming twelfth installment of the ''[[Battlefield|Battlefield series]]'', also the direct sequel to ''[[Battlefield 2]]'', which was released on June 21, 2005. The game is been developed by the Swedish company Digital Illusions CE (DICE) and will be published by Electronic Arts on October 25, 2011 in North-America, later in Australia on October 27th and on October 28th in Europe. One of the main features of the game is the new engine, the Frostbite 2, which bringing a large improvement from ''[[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]]'s'' engine, and includes the graphics, sounds, animations, gameplay overall and much more. ''BF3'' is developed for the PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 platforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The following weapons appear in the video game ''Battlefield 3'':'''&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&amp;lt;br clear=&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Handguns =&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta M9 ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of the single-player mission that was shown during gameplay footage, a Marine who is sitting in front of the player has a [[Beretta 92 pistol series#Beretta 92F/FS|Beretta M9]] pistol holstered to his vest. It can also be seen in the multiplayer footage of E3 that the player is reloading his M9. Another note of interest is that unlike in [[Battlefield: Bad Company 2]] and [[Medal of Honor (2010)|Medal of Honor]]'s multiplayer, the M9's magazine has 15 rounds + 1 in the chamber like in reality. An M9 fitted with a suppressor can be seen in the CO-OP trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M9-pistolet.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta M9 - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3_pistol_m9.png|thumb|none|650px|A Beretta M9 holstered to a Marine's vest's is circled in red. Also note that the same U.S. Marine is inaccurately shown to have a U.S. Flag Patch on his sleeve. In reality, U.S. Marines do not wear flag or unit patches on their sleeves.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M9.jpg|thumb|none|650px|M9 being reload by the player in multiplayer footage.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:bf3m92.JPG|thumb|none|650px|M9 fitted with suppressor used by the player in co-op footage.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-443 Grach ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Yarygin_PYa#MP-443_Grach|MP-443]] returns from Bad Company 2, as it's briefly visible in the multiplayer kill list in the &amp;quot;Operation Métro&amp;quot; trailer. It is the Russian faction's sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP433Grach.jpg|none|thumb|350px|MP-443 Grach - 9x19mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_MP443_killtext.JPG|thumb|none|296px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3Grach.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads an MP-443 in the recent Caspian Border multiplayer trailer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Grach.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Grach MP-443]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 17 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock#Glock 17|Glock 17]] is shown in an official screenshot for the Battlelog. Called &amp;quot;G17C&amp;quot; in the beta, although it is modeled after a standard Glock 17 as there are no compensator cuts on the top of the slide and comes standard with a laser sight.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock173rdGen.jpg|thumb|none|350px|A Generation 3 Glock 17 - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/battlefield_5F00_bad_5F00_company/2.jpg Glock 17 in the Battlelog]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Glock bf3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Glock]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MEU(SOC) Pistol==&lt;br /&gt;
The USMC variant of the [[M1911]],  the [[M1911_pistol_series#M45_.2F_MEU.28SOC.29|MEU(SOC) Pistol]], can be used if the player is a Battlefield Veteran or a member of the EA Gun Club. It is a standard M1911A1 with a three-hole trigger, commander-style hammer, beavertail grip safety, rubber grips, and uses 8 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver MEU.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MEU(SOC) Pistol - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beretta 93R ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Beretta 93R]] can be unlocked a sidearm, and is correctly named &amp;quot;93R&amp;quot;, while most games seem to call it the &amp;quot;M93R&amp;quot;, which is incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Beretta93-1-.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Beretta 93R - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Glock 18 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Glock 18]] appears as the &amp;quot;G18&amp;quot;. It has an extended magazine base that gives it a 19 round capacity, and also has a non-removable laser sight. Interestingly enough in the beta, the suppressed Glock 18 is unlocked before the standard unsupressed variant.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Glock18c_01-1-.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Glock 18C (3rd Generation) - 9x19mm. The model in-game is not a &amp;quot;C&amp;quot; model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MP-412 REX ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[MP-412 REX|MP-412]] revolver returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 as an unlockable sidearm.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mp-412-1.jpg|thumb|none|350px|MP-412 REX - .357 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taurus Model 44 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Taurus Model 44]]  appears as an unlockable sidearm, and can be fitted with a scope. Appears as &amp;quot;T44&amp;quot;, one of the few weapons in game that does not go by its proper name, most likely due to legal reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Taurus 44.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Taurus Model 44 with 6&amp;quot; barrel - .44 Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sub-Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike previous games in the series, SMGs are all-kit unlockables, and not strictly limited to an Engineer/Spec Ops-type class.&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 ==&lt;br /&gt;
A detailed pick-up icon for the [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45]] can be seen in GameSpot's recently released Tokyo Game Show gameplay footage. The game correctly depicts the UMP's single/2 round burst/full auto firing modes.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMP_45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch UMP45 - .45 ACP]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:UMPBF45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Pick-up icon for the UMP45.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PP-2000 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PP-2000]] returns from Bad Company 2, feeling much more realistic this time around, with a more believable firing rate and packs a decent punch per shot, as opposed to the previous game in which it's firing rate was more akin to a Minigun and power-per-shot around the area of lightly tossing a handful of pebbles at your opponents face. Comes standard with a 20 round mag, and a 40 round extended mag can be unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pp-2000.jpg|thumb|none|350px|PP-2000 with red dot sight - 9x19mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pp-2k.jpg|thumb|none|600px|PP-2000]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN P90TR ==&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN P90#P90 TR|FN P90TR (Triple Rail)]] can be seen in E3 coverage from IGN. It can be used by any kit once unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_P90_Triple_Rail_(TR).jpg‎|thumb|none|400px|FN P90TR - 5.7x28mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:battp90.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Soldier wielding the FN P90TR. Notice that the magazine in the P90 is not locked inside the mechanism but inside the weapon itself(!). This is probably just a model error only within the alpha version of the game. It also appears to be a tad over-sized too.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7|H&amp;amp;K MP7A1]] can be unlocked and used by any kit, and can also be equipped with 40 round magazines, as opposed to the 20 round standard.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:MP7 40rdmag.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch MP7A1 with Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight and 40-round magazine - 4.6x30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Assault Rifles &amp;amp; Battle Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M4/M4A1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 Carbine]] is commonly seen in gameplay footage which is also in the hands of the main character. During the alpha stages footage, the in-game M4A1 can be seen fitted with iron sights, EOTech 551 Holographic sight, Trijicon TA01NSN 4x32 ACOG scope, Surefire Universal WeaponLight, AN/PEQ-2 laser designator, Magpul Ranger Plate, and a SOPMOD stock. Two different &amp;quot;reload-from-empty&amp;quot; animations have been seen. The &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; trailers had the player rack the charging handle, while in the more recent Operation Metro trailer, and the rest since then, the player uses the bolt release. It has been confirmed that both the M4A1 (full-auto) and M4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. In multiplayer, the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for US Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ColtM4.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M4A1 Carbine with M68 Aimpoint red dot sight and RIS foregrip - 5.56x45mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:M4BF3Teaser02.jpg‎|600px|thumb|none|The M4A1 is clearly shown in the hand of the player with various attachments, as the Marines are about to perform an entry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wmplayer_2011-03-03_21-30-55-59.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player is running with his M4A1 after engaging the enemy during the first episode of the &amp;quot;Fault Line&amp;quot; videos.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield-3-screenshot-2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player is reloading his M4A1.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4carryinghandle.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The M4A1 is appearing here with carrying handle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AKS-74U ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AKS-74U|AKS-74U]] has been seen in gameplay trailers, fitted with a SureFire Universal WeaponLight. In multiplayer, the AKS-74U, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit, and is the starting weapon for Russian Engineers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AKSU-Krinkov.jpg|thumb|none|450px|AKS-74U - 5.45x39mm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-AKS74U.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AKS-74U in idle view.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bf3-e3-screenshot-28-d.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Looking through the AKS-74U's iron sights.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Aks74u.jpg|thumb|none|600px|AKS-74U in-game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN Mk 17 Mod 0 (SCAR-H CQC) ==&lt;br /&gt;
The FN Mk 17 Mod 0, or [[FN SCAR#FN SCAR-H|SCAR-H CQC]], can be seen in the new Caspian Border gameplay trailer. In multiplayer, the SCAR-H, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit. A modelling mistakes shows the fire selector switch set on semi-auto as the weapon itself fires on full-auto.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2fff2537c0.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Third Generation Fabrique Nationale SCAR-H CQC - 7.62x51mm NATO.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3Scar.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads his SCAR-H, fitted with a Trijicon RX01 reflex sight and RIS foregrip. Note that even though the weapon fires on full-auto, the fire selector switch is set on semi-auto.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A-91 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[A-91]] appears and, being a carbine (or just a really short rifle), is used by the Engineer kit. It does not have its 40mm grenade launcher. It is the successor to the 9A-91 from Bad Company 2, albeit it fires the 5.56 NATO whereas the 9A-91 fired the 9x39 round.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A91.jpg|thumb|none|450px|5,56A-91 - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C ==&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C]] is briefly seen being used by one of the players in PAX coverage from NVIDIA. In multiplayer, the G36C, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:G36CwForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G36C with vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Battlefield 3 Tourney PAX Prime Day 2 Wrap Up.mp4 000021722.jpg|thumb|none|500px|A teammate in front of player is seen using a G36C.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SIG SG 553 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SIG SG 550|SG 553]] has been confirmed by DICE in the official Battlefield Blog. In multiplayer, like the M4A1, being a carbine, is used by the 'Engineer' kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SIG SG 553-2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|SIG SG 553 with railed handguard, vertical foregrip, flashlight, ACOG and 20-round factory magazine - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf3sg553.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The render of the SG 553 showing the various attachments and combat roles available for the weapon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colt M16A3/M16A4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M16 rifle series#M16A4 Rifle|M16A4 rifle]] was one of the first weapon to be shown on early gameplay footage, but was lacking rear iron sights and even optical sights because of the alpha stage development, though were added later on. It has been confirmed that both the M16A3 (full-auto) and M16A4 (3-round burst) will be available for use within the game. They have M16A1 flash hiders and a rail cover on the right side rail, and the fire selector is also always set to semi.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M16A4withANPEQ&amp;amp;ACOG.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M16A4 MWS (Modular Weapon System) with RAS rails installed, AN/PEQ-2 IR designator, RIS foregrip, and Trijicon 4x32 ACOG scope - 5.56x45mm. This is the USMC style setup.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:M16BF3Teaser.jpg|600px|thumb|none|The Marine on the top middle of the screen is carrying an M16A4 during the briefing scene; note the lack of rear iron sight or even optical sight.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Eapwned_m16a4.jpg|600px|thumb|none|A demonstration of the character's movement animation, using an M16A4 with carrying handle attached. You can also note a Magpul attached to the magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4nosight.jpg|thumb|none|600px|In this picture, it seems that the developers have removed the front gas block like in '''Call of Duty'''. So in this case, the rifle would not properly function like in reality. This has since been fixed by having the player co-witness the sights.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:M16 ups.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M16 UPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AK-74#AK-74|AK-74M]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AK-74M.jpg|thumb|none|500px|AK-74M - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10823 battlefield-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10825 battlefield-3.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AK-74M_BF3_2.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_IMFDB_(AK-74).JPG|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ak74m.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Ak74M]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[HK416]] returns from Bad Company and Bad Company 2 having a 10.4&amp;quot; barrel and OD furniture. It is the first unlock for the Assault kit and can have an M320 (which replaces the kit's Medkit) mounted as long as a grip or bipod are not. It once again appears as the &amp;quot;M416&amp;quot;, most likely for copyright reasons. For some reason is has semi, auto, and three round burst firing modes, something that most Stoner platforms aren't capable of. (Korean M16 Clone is semi, burst, full.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Heckler and Koch 416.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK416 with 10 inch barrel - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hk416.jpg|thumb|none|600px|H&amp;amp;K HK416]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AEK-971 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AEK-971]] is an unlock for the Assault kit, and, like the real weapon, has virtually no recoil.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:aek971_545.jpg|thumb|none|500px|AEK-971 (Current Model) with folding stock -  5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN F2000 Tactical ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN F2000]] returns from the Bad Company series, and has much more realistic statistics, most notably that it doesn't have a fire rate resembling a minigun. Due to its lack of an underslung rail, an M320 or M26 MASS will be carried as a standalone if the F2000 is equipped, though this may or may not change in the final game.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FN_F2000_tactical.jpg|thumb|none|450px|FN F2000 Tactical with folding vertical foregrip - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AN-94 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AN-94]] returns from the Bad Company series.  The rifle's distinct dual-rate full-auto mode has been split into 2 distinct fire modes: An 1800RPM 2-round burst mode, and a 600RPM full-auto mode.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian AN-94 Abakan Nikonov 5.45x39mm assault rifle 3.jpg|thumb|500px|none|AN-94 Abakan Nikonov - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DIO KH2002 Khaybar ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Xbox 360 Operation Guillotine gameplay trailer shows a PLR militant using the DIO Khaybar (aka KH2002) assault rifle. The weapon is a bullpup conversion of the DIO S-5.56 assault rifle, which is a direct copy of the [[M16 rifle series#Norinco Model 311|Norinco CQ]] assault rifle. The KH2002 was put into service in 2004 as a replacement for the Iranian Military's obsolete G3A3. The model featured in the game is the improved model introduced in 2009, as noted by its longer carry handle and barrel mounted front sight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fun Fact: The rifle is named after &amp;quot;The Battle of Khaybar,&amp;quot; where the Muslim Prophet Muhammad lead a victorious attack against a large settlement of Jews living in the Arabian settlement of Khaybar. Muhammad believed that the loot and prestige gained from Khaybar would be necessary in order to fund his future military campaigns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kh2002 2009 improved.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The Iranian Defense Industries Organization (DIO) KH2002, improved 2009 model - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:KH@))@.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|An enemy soldier drops the KH2002 after being shot in the face.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:KH2002_pick_up.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Detailed pick-up icon that definitively proves the Khaybar variant used in the game is the 2009 model.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the new &amp;quot;Securing the Apartment Block&amp;quot; gameplay footage that was recorded at the Tokyo Game Show, a pick-up icon for a [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3|G3A3]] can be seen. Since Battlefield 3 takes place (for the most part) in Northern Iraq and Iran, it is entirely possible that this is actually an Iranian manufactured G3 and not a standard H&amp;amp;K one. The Iranian-manufactured version differs in that it utilizes a slimline handguard and has Farsi writing on the receiver, whereas the version depicted appears to have a wide handguard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3a3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch G3A3 with wide handguard - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G3A3bf3.jpg|thumb|none|500px|The detailed pick-up icon for the G3A3.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AS Val ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[AS Val]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely due to its small size and unique integrated suppressor, making it too specialized for any specific kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:As val1.jpg|thumb|none|450px|AS Val - 9x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magpul PDR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Magpul PDR]] appears as an all kit weapon, most likely because, other than firing the 5.56mm round, the gun is basically an SMG. For unknown reasons, it appears as the &amp;quot;PDW-R&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MagpulPDR.jpg|thumb|400px|none|A more recent model of the Magpul PDR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Machine Guns =&lt;br /&gt;
== Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Heckler &amp;amp; Koch HK rifle series#Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR]] is the starting weapon for the US support class, and uses a 45-round extended magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:H&amp;amp;K M27 IAR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M27 IAR - 5.56x45mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iar+.jpg|thumb|none|600px|IAR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kalashnikov RPK-74M ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPK light machine gun#RPK-74|RPK-74M]] is the starting weapon for the Russian Support class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:rpk74m.jpg|thumb|none|501px|RPK-74M light machine gun with 45-round box magazine - 5.45x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rpk.jpg|thumb|none|600px|RPK]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M249 SAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
An [[FN Minimi#M249-E1 / M249-E2 / M249 Paratrooper SAW|M249 SAW]]  was seen in E3 multiplayer footage. In the open beta, the STANAG magazine well can clearly be seen.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk46.jpg‎|thumb|none|450px|Mk 46 Mod 0 light machine gun - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-M249.jpg|thumb|none|600px|M249 SAW used by the player in E3 multiplayer footage. Note the M145 Machine Gun Optic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKP Pecheneg ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK_Machine_Gun#PKP_Pecheneg_Machine_Gun|PKP Pecheneg]] has been seen in gameplay trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pecheneg.jpg|thumb|501px|none|PKP Pecheneg machine gun with ammo box - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-PKP.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M240B ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240B]] appears in the hands of some U.S. Marines, and in the hands of the player, fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS). The trailer shows the weapon as having a deployable bipod which can be used to increase accuracy during prolonged firing, at the cost of player mobility.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M240B with newer style lower handguard (designed to attach RIS rails via hex nut) - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3TeaserM249.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player uses an M240B fitted with an EOTech Holographic Weapon Sight (HWS) while engaging multiple enemies in the teaser video.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bf6.jpg|thumb|none|600px|A U.S. Marine in the foreground is seen using an M240B.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2401.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Full view of the M240B as seen in the recent Fault Line 3 trailer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M60E4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M60E4]] is the last MG to be unlocked in the Support kit. Extended magazines gifts the weapon with a massive 200 round box and this is visually shown on the weapon when attached.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M60E4-mk43.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M60E4 Mk.43 with picatinny rails, RIS foregrip, and ammo belt - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco QJY-88 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Norinco QJY-88]] returns from Bad Company 2, once again called the &amp;quot;Type 88&amp;quot;. It appears in the material marketing the pre-order rewards.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Type88gpmg2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Norinco QJY-88 - 5.8x42mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_Type88_Warfare_Pack.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Sniper Rifles =&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually, Recon players can opt for low-magnification optics, unmagnified reflex/red-dot sights, or even iron-sights in lieu of the standard high-magnification optics.&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 11 Mod 0 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Knight's_Armament_SR-25|Mk 11 Mod 0]] appears in the &amp;quot;Operation Métro&amp;quot; multiplayer trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SR25.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Knight's Armament SR-25 (known as Mk11 Mod 0 in USMC and US Navy service) with suppressor and Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3-9A91.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mk11.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mk.11]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Norinco NDM-86 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The .308 variant of the [[SVD_Dragunov#Norinco_NDM-86|Norinco NDM-86]] returns from [[Battlefield Play4Free]], once again appearing as the ''SVD''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ndm86.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Norinco NDM-86 - .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_SVD_killtext.JPG|thumb|none|338px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Svd.jpg|thumb|none|600px|NDM-86]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SV-98 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SV-98]] returns as the first unlockable bolt action rifle.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:SV98.jpg|thumb|none|500px|SV-98 - 7.62x54mmR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SKS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SKS rifle|SKS]] is seen mentioned in pre-order information. In-game, it has synthetic Tapco furniture and uses 20 round magazines.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Simonov-Russian-SKS45.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Russian Simonov Type 45 aka the Russian SKS rifle - 7.62x39mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sks_tapco_stock.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Sks with tapco furniture installed as it appears ingame.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sksone.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Skstwo.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sksthree.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M40A5 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington Model 700|M40A5]] is the second bolt action rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M40A5.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M40A5 - 7.62x51mm NATO ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M98B ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M98B|M98B]] is the last bolt action unlocked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M98B.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Barrett M98B with Harris bipod - .338 Lapua Magnum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M39 EMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M14#M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle|M39 EMR]] is the last rifle unlocked for the Recon class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M-39EMR.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M39 Enhanced Marksman Rifle with Harris bipod - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barrett M82A3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barrett M107|M82A3]] (aka M107) is confirmed to be in the game, however, DICE felt that the .50 caliber round it uses would either be overpowered if depicted properly, or feel useless if kept balanced, so they opted to simply not have it multiplayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Berrett M107.jpg|thumb|none|550px|Barrett M82A3 (aka M107) long range sniper rifle - .50 BMG.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Shotguns =&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time in a main Battlefield series game (excluding spinoffs like [[Battlefield Play4Free]]), shotguns can be iron-sighted, and like the SMGs, can be used in every kit. In addition, DICE made it so that their shotguns have considerable range, unlike most videogames where you have to see the whites of the enemies' eyes for shotguns to be effective. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M26 MASS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M26 MASS]] can be mounted on any of the assault rifles in the Assault kit. It can fire buckshot, flechettes, frag rounds, or slugs, same as the other shotguns.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM26 2 highRes.jpg|thumb|none|470px|M26 MASS - 12 Gauge, mounted on [[M16 rifle series#M4/M4A1 Carbine|M4A1 carbine]] with C-More red dot sight - 5.56x45mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remington 870 MCS ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Remington 870|Remington 870 MCS]] appears as the &amp;quot;870 MCS&amp;quot; in the beta. The player characters pump the shotgun right immediately after fire and very quickly, which makes it seem almost semi-automatic in the game, like a pump action combat shotgun should be.  Magazine capacities are either the standard 4+1, or the extended 6+1.  Using the extended option will change the model's magazine tube accordingly. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rem870mcs 14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Remington 870 MCS Entry version - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:KH@))@.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The player character shoots an enemy soldier with an 870 MCS.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:870.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The Remington 870 MCS as seen in the open beta.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benelli M1014 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Benelli M4 Super 90|Benelli M1014]] features semi-automatic firing and its tactical stock fully retracted during gameplay. Should be noted the reload animation shows the player loading the first round into the breach first, then loading the remaining shells underneath shotgun.  Magazine capacities available are either the civilian legal 4+1, or the full-length 6+1 (Indicating the use of 3-inch magnum rounds.  The full-length tube normally holds seven 2.75-inch rounds)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M4Super90.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Benelli M4 Super 90 with 7-shot tube - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Saiga 12K ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Izhmash Saiga series shotgun|Saiga 12K]] returns from ''Battlefield 2'' and is the second semi-auto shotgun unlocked. Magazine capacities are either the standard 5+1, or an extended 8+1.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Saiga 12k-1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Saiga-12K - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Armsel Striker ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Armsel_Striker_and_variants#Armsel_Striker|Armsel Striker]] is included, identifiable by the winding key on the front of the drum magazine. The weapon is referred to as the &amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in material advertising the game's pre-order rewards, as it was in [[Battlefield 2]]; this stands for &amp;quot;double action only, 12 gauge&amp;quot; and is a ''description'' of the weapon rather than a correct name for it.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Striker.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Armsel Striker Shotgun - 12 gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BF3_DAO12_Warfare_Pack.jpg|thumb|none|600px|&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; pre-order image. Note the Picatinny rail added to the top of the receiver.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:Safdad.JPG|thumb|none|500px|&amp;quot;DAO-12&amp;quot; in game.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== USAS-12 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[USAS-12]] is the only full-auto shotgun in-game. In the beta, the magazine capacity is 7+1 by standard or 10+1 with the extended magazines equipped. Like all shotguns, it can utilise standard Buckshot, Slugs, Flechettes and explosive FRAG rounds as well as fit a variety of accessories and attachments.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:USAS12.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Daewoo USAS-12 with 10-round magazine - 12 Gauge]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Launchers =&lt;br /&gt;
==Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M320]] is the standard grenade launcher and can fire standard HE rounds, buckshot, or smoke rounds. It can either be mounted on the rifle, or standalone.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:XM320 stock extended.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Heckler &amp;amp; Koch M320 with optional telescoping stock - 40x46mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GP-30 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, if the M320 is mounted to a Russian weapon, it instead becomes a [[GP-30]], though the name is not mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gp-30 ak-74.jpg|thumb|none|500px|GP-30 40mm grenade launcher mounted on an [[AK-74]] (5.45x39mm)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW]] appears as the American Engineer's unguided rocket launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk153SMAW.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|Mk 153 Mod 0 SMAW - 83mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3-Launcher.jpg‎ |thumb|none|350px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bazalt RPG-7V2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[RPG-7#RPG-7|RPG-7]] makes a return in Battlefield 3, as it was seen in Operation Metro multiplayer trailer.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rpg-7-1-.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|RPG-7 - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3RPG7.jpg‎ |thumb|none|600px|A soldier with an RPG-7 on his back.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3RPG.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player reloads an RPG-7 in the recent Caspian Border multiplayer trailer.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FIM-92A Stinger ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FIM-92A Stinger]] appears as the American Engineer's anti-air launcher.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:-0976t.jpg|thumb|none|500px|FIM-92A Stinger - 70mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SA-18 Grouse (9K38 Igla) ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[SA-18 Igla|SA-18 Grouse]] appears as the Russian Engineer's anti-air launcher. Oddly, in game it is named &amp;quot;SA-18 Igla&amp;quot;, using the US designation for the weapon, but the Russian nickname.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Igla 191.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SA-18 Grouse (9K38 Igla) launcher and missile - 72mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FGM-148 Javelin ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FGM-148 Javelin|Javelin]] appears and can be used in either top-down or direct-fire modes.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Javalin.jpg|thumb|none|400px|FGM-148 Javelin - 127mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M136 AT4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M136 AT4]] appears in the hands of US Marines. In the trailer, it seems to have a pistol grip instead of having the trigger on the back of the weapon behind the sights. As of the Beta it has not been seen in Multiplayer at all.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AT-4Launcher.jpg‎|thumb|none|500px|M136 AT4 - 84mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF3TeaserAT4.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The M136 AT4 is in the hand of the player as the Marines are engaging a sniper hidden in the hotel room from the rooftop.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Explosives =&lt;br /&gt;
== M67 Hand Grenade ==&lt;br /&gt;
During the first encounter, the player is throwing [[M67 hand grenade]]s at PLR militants. In multiplayer, every kit gets one as standard, but can equip more by using the &amp;quot;FRAG&amp;quot; specialization.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Baseball.jpg|thumb|none|250px|M67 hand grenade]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M15 Anti-Tank mine ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M15 anti-tank mine|M15 Anti-Tank mine]] can be used by the Engineet kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landmine-dod-closeup.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M15 Anti-Tank mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C4 ==&lt;br /&gt;
C4 packs can be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M18A1 Claymore ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[M18A1 Claymore]] anti-personnel mines can also be used by the Support kit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M18a1 07.jpg|thumb|none|350px|M18A1 Claymore anti-personnel mine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Emplaced Weapons =&lt;br /&gt;
== Kord ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Kord heavy machine gun]] is mounted on a number of technicals.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kord 02.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Kord heavy machine gun with ammo box - 12.7x108mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BF2 DSHK 1.jpg|thumb|none|600px|The player mans a technical-mounted Kord heavy machine gun.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Browning M2HB ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Browning M2#Browning M2 Heavy Barrel|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun]] appears in the game mounted on vehicles, including M1A2 Abrams tanks. The Abrams appear to be fitted with a remote mounting for the M2HB allowing the Commander to fire the weapon from inside the safety of the turret, a feature recently implemented on real-life M1A2's operating in Iraq.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BrowningM2.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Browning M2HB heavy machine gun in vehicle mount - .50 BMG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FN M240C ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FN MAG#M240 Machine Gun|M240C machine gun]] is most likely being co-axially mounted on the M1A2 Abrams MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M240C.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M240C machine gun - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== PKT ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[PK Machine Gun#Kalashnikov PK/PKM Machine Gun|PKT machine gun]] is most likely being co-axially mounted on the T-90 MBT.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Machine gun PKT.jpg|thumb|none|500px|PKT machine gun with 250-round ammo drum - 7.62x54mm R]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M134 Minigun ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[GE M134 Minigun]] is seen mounted on AH-6 Little Birds strafing ground targets.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M134.JPG|thumb|none|450px|General Electric M134 - 7.62x51mm NATO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bushmaster M242 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M242 Bushmaster chaingun]] is most likely being the main gun of the LAV-25.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M242 25mm gun.jpg|thumb|none|500px|M242 Bushmaster chaingun - 25mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mk 19 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mk 19 grenade launcher]] is seen mounted on M1114 Humvees.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US_Mk._19_40mm_grenade_machine-gun.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Mk 19 grenade launcher on vehicle mount - 40mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mk19BF3.jpg‎|thumb|none|600px|The Humvees at the start of the mission are seen equipped with a Mk 19 grenade launcher.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GE M61 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#M61 Vulcan|M61 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of F/A-18E Super Hornet fighters.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M61vulcan.jpg|thumb|none|450px|M61 Vulcan - 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M197 Vulcan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[M61 Vulcan#General Dynamics M197 Vulcan|M197 Vulcan]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of AH-1Z Viper helicopters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:M197Gatling.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M197 Vulcan 20mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shipunov 2A42 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Shipunov 2A42]] appears in the game as the secondary armament of Mi-28 Havoc helicopters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Shipunov 2A42.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Shipunov 2A42 30mm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First-Person Shooter]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Battlefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Swedish Produced/Filmed]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lurker McNasty</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>