<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Eagleye1022</id>
	<title>Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Eagleye1022"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Eagleye1022"/>
	<updated>2026-05-28T17:39:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Enfield_SA80&amp;diff=212677</id>
		<title>Talk:Enfield SA80</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Enfield_SA80&amp;diff=212677"/>
		<updated>2009-12-08T03:41:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Eagleye1022: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:Too bad I will probably never have the chance to handle one of these-[[User:S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter|S&amp;amp;amp;Wshooter]] 01:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ehh... I could live without messing with one. The fact that it is the main battle rifle of the army, but SAS does not use it says a lot to me.  I'll follow the highly trained experts who have the choice in what to carry and from what I've mostly read that choice is a M4 variant. [[User:Eagleye1022|Eagleye1022]] 03:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Excessive Variants==&lt;br /&gt;
This page has too many SA80 variants that have not appeared in any films/games/animes, it needs to be cut down. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 22:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed the L98 section and listed their appearance according to each variant.--[[User:SB2296|SB2296]] 13:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beta-C Compatibility? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know if any of the SA80-series weapons, such as the L86A1 &amp;amp; L86A2 LSW variants, can use Beta-C drum magazines? I know they can handle all [[M16 rifle series|STANAG]] box magazines, but the design of the SA80's magazine well makes me wonder wether it could take the Beta-C or not. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 13:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In theory it should be able to fit and feed from Beta-C mags, but I think the postiton of the Mag-well, given the bullpup configuration of the weapon, would make it impractical to use, given that it would mean the mag would be in the way of your arm when holding the weapon. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone remember the old quad-stacked magazines they used to have for the Suomi M31,(http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg52-e.htm), anyone think that we could bring back that concept? Yeah it wouldn't be the 100 rounds in the Beta-C, but it could potentially make any rifle that can accept STANAG Magazines into a light automatic weapon. [[User:W190009637|W190009637]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No, i don´t think so, for a LaW use an Ultimax or FN Minimi.-[[User:Markost|Markost]] 15:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Which is what the Birtish Army has done, replaced the L86A2 with the FN Minimi Para (L110A1) in the LSW role, and using the L86A2 in the DMR role with a conventional STANAG Magazine. [[User:The Wierd It|The Wierd It]] 16:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'd pick the Ares Shrike out of the lot myself. Light weight, compact, dual belt and magazine feed, rifleman accuracy... what more could one ask for? If only they could get the damned thing into widespread production, it would have been a shoe-in for the USMC IAR program. [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] 21:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Eagleye1022</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:You_Don%27t_Mess_with_the_Zohan&amp;diff=208787</id>
		<title>Talk:You Don't Mess with the Zohan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:You_Don%27t_Mess_with_the_Zohan&amp;diff=208787"/>
		<updated>2009-11-27T06:02:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Eagleye1022: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Screencaps==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I baby-sat my neighbor's son yesterday, and we rented this movie. As you might expect, it was pretty lame (like lots of Sandler movies). But since I rented it, and since it has lots of guns, I might as well screencap it. I have plans tonight, but I'll see if I can get this page done tomorrow. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 23:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==commentary==&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the comment about the rubber Uzi having poor molding.  There is NO way to fully mold the front sight (with the gap) of the gun in soft rubber any other way.  If it was just like the real one, the 'ears' of the front sight would rip off on the first stunt.  Being one who has tried doing rubber pulls of guns myself (it's SUPER difficult to do well) I just defer now to the experts who charge me an arm and a leg for a rubber stunt gun.  But now that more 'industry' people are perusing IMFDB, I'm going to start editing anything which may be insulting to the people who work on this stuff.  Just a note :)  MPM2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CoverArt==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it just me or does the gun Adam Sandler have on his back have an Uzi pistol grip/magazine and extended butt stock and then a Galil front end extended out the other side of his back? Eagleye1022&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Eagleye1022</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:You_Don%27t_Mess_with_the_Zohan&amp;diff=208786</id>
		<title>Talk:You Don't Mess with the Zohan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:You_Don%27t_Mess_with_the_Zohan&amp;diff=208786"/>
		<updated>2009-11-27T06:01:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Eagleye1022: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Screencaps==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I baby-sat my neighbor's son yesterday, and we rented this movie. As you might expect, it was pretty lame (like lots of Sandler movies). But since I rented it, and since it has lots of guns, I might as well screencap it. I have plans tonight, but I'll see if I can get this page done tomorrow. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 23:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==commentary==&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the comment about the rubber Uzi having poor molding.  There is NO way to fully mold the front sight (with the gap) of the gun in soft rubber any other way.  If it was just like the real one, the 'ears' of the front sight would rip off on the first stunt.  Being one who has tried doing rubber pulls of guns myself (it's SUPER difficult to do well) I just defer now to the experts who charge me an arm and a leg for a rubber stunt gun.  But now that more 'industry' people are perusing IMFDB, I'm going to start editing anything which may be insulting to the people who work on this stuff.  Just a note :)  MPM2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CoverArt==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it just me or does the gun Adam Sandler have on his back have an Uzi pistol grip/magazine and extended butt stock and then a Galil front end extended out the other side of his back?~~&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Eagleye1022</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>